Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Prudence on April 12, 2019, 12:03:35 PM
-
How can you defend this?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-latest-news-live-updates-5g-twitter-today-sanctuary-cities-border-assange-wikileaks-a8867891.html
-
Whats the problem? Fuckers declare sanctuary city status, they should be thanking Trump for fulfilling their wish, or do they really not love the illegals?
-
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
-
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
So are illegals. If cities and states want to circumvent immigration laws then let them have the illegals.
-
Okay Einstein..if they are ILLEGAL, how can the government LEGALLY let them entier a city?
The fact that you are defending it says lots.
-
Okay Einstein..if they are ILLEGAL, how can the government LEGALLY let them entier a city?
The fact that you are defending it says lots.
They're called liberals, sweetcheeks.
-
Wait...
Do you really think my ass looks okay?
I mean--I'm a top--but it's nice to hear.
Thanks babe.
xxoxxx
-
Okay Einstein..if they are ILLEGAL, how can the government LEGALLY let them entier a city?
The fact that you are defending it says lots.
The local governments are breaking federal law.
-
Oh--i see..
SO the answer to that is the federal gvmt should break laws too?
-
To admit it's a tactic is to admit that illegals are not valuable for anything other than votes.
-
Great Good Going Donald
And the mere Fact it’s annoying Wrongly Wired / Nature’s Fuck up like Queer Boy
All The Better 😂🤣😂
Carry on Donald.
-
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
Really dick head what the fuck do you think a "sanctuary city" is? you ignorant son of a bitch can't even come up with a good argument.
-
Is this supposed to be a negative towards Trump?
-
Really dick head what the fuck do you think a "sanctuary city" is? you ignorant son of a bitch can't even come up with a good argument.
Of course not his brain isn’t wired correctly is it.
-
OK since your all such good Americans--why not take one for the tear then huh?
Lets say one of these illegals that's released into a sanctuary city KILLS A FAMILY MEMBER while running around town? He would have been in a detention center somewhere, but your brilliant President walked him right in.
As we all know, some of them ARE in fact bad people--but not all of them.
But lets say one of the bad ones killed a family member of yours.
Still such a good idea?
Idots...every last one of you.
-
OK since your all such good Americans--why not take one for the tear then huh?
Lets say one of these illegals that's released into a sanctuary city KILLS A FAMILY MEMBER while running around town? He would have been in a detention center somewhere, but your brilliant President walked him right in.
As we all know, some of them ARE in fact bad people--but not all of them.
But lets say one of the bad ones killed a family member of yours.
Still such a good idea?
Idots...every last one of you.
As usual you want to play some game when you say they are little drops of love its all good. Fuck off, you want to play stupid games win stupid prizes.
-
Kazan--answer the fucking question or fuck off.
You have made ZERO sense in your last 3 post.
Are you fucking 12 years old>??????
-
OK since your all such good Americans--why not take one for the tear then huh?
Lets say one of these illegals that's released into a sanctuary city KILLS A FAMILY MEMBER while running around town? He would have been in a detention center somewhere, but your brilliant President walked him right in.
As we all know, some of them ARE in fact bad people--but not all of them.
But lets say one of the bad ones killed a family member of yours.
Still such a good idea?
Idots...every last one of you.
As far as I know one of the issues is how can they be placed in a detention center when your party will not give enough funding, etc. to meet the "demand"?
The next best place is to put them in those towns that can afford, etc. to have them or those places that voted in those policies/leaders. The ones who did not, should not have to deal with lawlessness.
It makes no sense that they would have an issue with this and exposes the liberals hypocrisy once again by him or his administration even entertaining the idea by them. It's actually quite hilarious.
-
Kazan--answer the fucking question or fuck off.
You have made ZERO sense in your last 3 post.
Are you fucking 12 years old>??????
No, fuck you , you leftist guys want to claim that illegals are little drops of love, why aren't you embracing this? because your a fucking girl, that thinks that shit only happens to someone else. any time you want to step up let me know, i will beat you to with an inch of your useless homo life. vegas where ever the fuck you are, I travel extensively. Your pile of shit IQ probably can't comprehend this
bring it homo
-
lol!
WOW Kazan---what's the matter?
Such rage...
Fucking clown.
-
As far as I know one of the issues is how can they be placed in a detention center when your party will not give enough funding, etc. to meet the "demand"?
WHy not use some of those billions for that wall that's never gonna get finished?
Hire more officers--overhaul the system.
-
lol!
WOW Kazan---what's the matter?
Such rage...
Fucking clown.
Just as I though a gutless turd who runs his mouth in his mothers basement. When this finally kicks off, I'll look for you on the field.
(https://meangreenmath.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/violence.jpg?w=600&h=447)
-
Oh--i see..
SO the answer to that is the federal gvmt should break laws too?
Actually, I would prefer that illegals were taken out to sea in a rusty old ship and let it sink. But that's just me.
-
WHy not use some of those billions for that wall that's never gonna get finished?
Hire more officers--overhaul the system.
You asked for an answer but did not like the response.
Why not fund both? They essentially chose neither.
I wish they really could reap what they sow and Trump could do this.
What is the big deal of sending these people to places that supposedly want them and will treat them magnificently over a place that doesn't want them/doesn't have the resources to handle them? If it is a big deal to them then their argument of opposition to border security/illegal immigration is mute.
-
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
Big flaw in your argument right off of the bat.
Sanctuary cities are against federal law. They are a drain on the rest of the country's taxpayers, and change the demographics of our country. Something that is being done in the hopes of political gain under the disguise of compassion and moral high ground. If they want illegals, and he grants their wish he's again the bad guy.
Please tell me how Trump can do just 3 things right in your eyes, and give the justification for each.
-
Big flaw in your argument right off of the bat.
Sanctuary cities are against federal law. They are a drain on the rest of the country's taxpayers, and change the demographics of our country. Something that is being done in the hopes of political gain under the disguise of compassion and moral high ground. If they want illegals, and he grants their wish he's again the bad guy.
Please tell me how Trump can do just 3 things right in your eyes, and give the justification for each.
This as you said it appears it’s all about political gain
Scumbag politics playing to the lowest common denominator.
-
Once again Trumptard gut reaction emotion running wild
First of all what Trump proposes IS illegal. He's already been told it's illegal and his statement that he is "strongly looking at releasing immigrant detainees into sanctuary cities" is not only illegal but not even logistically feasible (is he going to pull border patrol off duty to have the distribute asylum seekers across the US?)
Santuary cities exist because those cities recognize that illegal immigrants will always exist and they'd rather have them be willing to report crimes when they witness them, have their kids in school rather than running the streets, etc... It BENEFITS this cities to have these people doing these things.
If Trumptards are saying that it's OK For the POTUS to break the law because illegal immigrants are also breaking the law then why even bother having laws at all. Why even bother having a Constitution. Remember this is the idea of the fucking weirdo who publicly humps the flag.
We know the POTUS feels this way because just this week he publicly wished he could just get rid of judges
This is not how our country operates.
If you don't like the law then work on legislation and change the fucking laws. Of course this would require hard work and we know Trump doesn't have the time, patience or attention span to actually do that
I know this really hard and confusing for Trumptard to understand, most especially for the fat fucking crybaby snowflake in the White House
-
Once again Trumptard gut reaction emotion running wild
First of all what Trump proposes IS illegal. He's already been told it's illegal and his statement that he is "strongly looking at releasing immigrant detainees into sanctuary cities" is not only illegal but not even logistically feasible (is he going to pull border patrol off duty to have the distribute asylum seekers across the US?)
Santuary cities exist because those cities recognize that illegal immigrants will always exist and they'd rather have them be willing to report crimes when they witness them, have their kids in school rather than running the streets, etc... It BENEFITS this cities to have these people doing these things.
If Trumptards are saying that it's OK For the POTUS to break the law because illegal immigrants are also breaking the law then why even bother having laws at all. Why even bother having a Constitution. Remember this is the idea of the fucking weirdo who publicly humps the flag.
We know the POTUS feels this way because just this week he publicly wished he could just get rid of judges
This is not how our country operates.
If you don't like the law then work on legislation and change the fucking laws. Of course this would require hard work and we know Trump doesn't have the time, patience or attention span to actually do that
I know this really hard and confusing for Trumptard to understand, most especially for the fat fucking crybaby snowflake in the White House
There's already laws in place, that's why they're called ILLEGAL immigrants, you fucking moron.
-
There's already laws in place, that's why they're called ILLEGAL immigrants, you fucking moron.
He’s seriously got something seriously wrong with his thinking - He’s delusional
To say the Least.
The Fucking Idiot Cannot Even Admit or take on board That They are There Illegally
& Should Be Booted Out ASAP when caught / Found - Oh No Everyone Except the
Illegals are Wrong & The Sanctuary Cities/ States.
With so many Retards like him about and being able to vote it Fucking Worrying.
-
What is the problem with this
-
Straw Man and Prudence are the kind of "men" that when looking at a puddle of shit and vomit on a sidewalk in San Francisco don't see the disgusting truth but instead announce to the world that they see a "Picasso" and demand the pavement be laminated to protect the "work of art".
This truth bears repeating throughout the forum and the real world. They and their kind are vile and when the tide turns against them no civilized person should save them from drowning. They deserve to be horribly and thoroughly violated by their creation.
-
You asked for an answer but did not like the response.
You said it's because they don't have the funding. I replied by suggesting it come from that imaginary border wall.
I do agree--we need a better solution to this problem. It's gotten out of hand. We CANNOT sustain our way of life with hundreds of thousands of people coming here. It's a drain on our system, and not fair to Americans. Enough is enough--we've done our share to help the rest of the world.
This wall is too expensive and it's not going to make a dent in the drugs coming in.
Please tell me how Trump can do just 3 things right in your eyes, and give the justification for each.
What do u mean? Three things he can do in terms of the immigration problem?
1-improve the wall we have
2-hire many MANY more officers
3-do NOT go along with the Democrats and feel the need to spend money in OTHER fucking countries to give them a reason to want to stay in their home land. Don't like your country? Sucks--but you can't sneak in here. Come legally.
-
Oh--i see..
SO the answer to that is the federal gvmt should break laws too?
He's giving the criminal liberals what they want (sanctuary cities in itself are Illegal especially since federal law overrides local law), called their bluff and as predicted, they backed down. Lets face it, he's light years smarter than the most sophisticated liberal and psychologically mind fucks them daily. You can't out maneuver him. Anyone with half a brain knew what the left's reaction would be....Trump wins again.
-
You said it's because they don't have the funding. I replied by suggesting it come from that imaginary border wall.
I do agree--we need a better solution to this problem. It's gotten out of hand. We CANNOT sustain our way of life with hundreds of thousands of people coming here. It's a drain on our system, and not fair to Americans. Enough is enough--we've done our share to help the rest of the world.
This wall is too expensive and it's not going to make a dent in the drugs coming in.
What do u mean? Three things he can do in terms of the immigration problem?
1-improve the wall we have
2-hire many MANY more officers
3-do NOT go along with the Democrats and feel the need to spend money in OTHER fucking countries to give them a reason to want to stay in their home land. Don't like your country? Sucks--but you can't sneak in here. Come legally.
I agree with some of what you say and other times I scratch my head and wonder if maybe you were facefucked too hard.
In this post here I would say that improving the wall we currently have would also include expanding it to cover more of the border.
-
Libatards are crying about ILLEGAL filth having illegal means carried out against them ? LOL What is Illegal on sending them to sanctuary cities ???
-
This kind of shit kills me, the media manipulation for democrats is blatant. Why is the quote from Trump the only time we see the words "illegal immigrants"?
Trump sanctuary city idea could help some immigrants
By ASTRID GALVAN | Sat, April 13, 2019 03:10 EDT
PHOENIX (AP) — An idea floated by President Donald Trump to send immigrants from the border to "sanctuary cities" to exact revenge on Democratic foes could end up doing the migrants a favor by placing them in locations that make it easier to put down roots and stay in the country.
The plan would put thousands of immigrants in cities that are not only welcoming to them, but also more likely to rebuff federal officials carrying out deportation orders. Many of these locations have more resources to help immigrants make their legal cases to stay in the United States than smaller cities, with some of the nation's biggest immigration advocacy groups based in places like San Francisco, New York City and Chicago. The downside for the immigrants would be a high cost of living in the cities.
The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University announced this week that an analysis found the likelihood of an immigrant in sanctuary cities such as New York and Los Angeles are 20% less likely to be arrested out in the community than in places without such policies.
"With immigrants being less likely to commit crimes than the U.S. born population, and with sanctuary jurisdictions being safer and more productive than non-sanctuary jurisdictions, the data damns this proposal as a politically motivated stunt that seeks to play politics with peoples' lives," said George Gascon, district attorney for San Francisco.
Trump has grown increasingly frustrated over the situation at the border, where tens of thousands of immigrant families are crossing each month, many to claim asylum. His administration has attempted several efforts to stop the flow and he recently shook up the top ranks of the Department of Homeland Security.
The idea to ship immigrants to Democratic strongholds was considered twice in recent months, but the White House and Department of Homeland Security said the plan had been rejected. But Trump said Friday he was still considering the idea.
"Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only," Trump tweeted. He added that, "The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy - so this should make them very happy!"
Wilson Romero is an immigrant from Honduras who chose to settle in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Romero, 27, was separated from his daughter, now 7, by federal authorities at the U.S. border at El Paso, Texas, last year and jailed for three months before being released and making his way to live with his mother in San Jose, California. There he was reunited with his daughter, who attends public kindergarten.
Romero says he goes about daily errands in public without worry of discrimination. His daughter has made friends and has playdates with the children of Mexican American families. It's a far cry from his hometown in the violence-plagued outskirts of San Pedro Sula, Honduras, that he fled after his brother-in-law was killed.
To him, the biggest problem with being in the Bay Area is the high cost of living. The former textile factory worker relies on his mother's income from waitressing for food and clothing, and he's started thinking about asking legal permission to move to North Carolina, where an uncle resides and says it's cheaper to live and work.
"To tell the truth, it's a little tight now, financially speaking," said Romero, a former textile factory worker, who He doesn't know of any charities that may be willing to help.
The plan discussed by Trump would also have financial, logistical and legal issues.
The transportation of immigrants who are arrested at the border to large and faraway cities would be burdensome and costly at a time when Immigration and Customs Enforcement is already stretched thin, having released over 125,000 immigrants into the country pending their immigration court since Dec. 21. They are currently being released mainly in border states.
Flights chartered by ICE cost about $7,785 per flight hour, according to the agency, and require multiple staffers, including an in-flight medical professional. The agency also uses commercial flights. Doing longer transports would increase liability for the agency, especially considering that many of the immigrants in its care are families with young children.
And despite the consideration given to releasing the immigrants on the streets to sanctuary cities, the Trump administration actually has plenty of jail space to detain families. As of April 11, the nation's three facilities to detain immigrant families were nowhere near capacity, including a Pennsylvania facility housing only nine immigrants.
It's also unclear how long the immigrants would stay in these cities because they are required to provide an address to federal authorities - typically of a family member - as a condition of their release.
"It's illogical," said Angela Chan, policy director and senior attorney with the San Francisco-based Asian Law Caucus. "It's just alarming that they are spending so much effort and so much time to engage in political theater."
The Trump administration has long pushed back against cities with sanctuary policies, which generally prohibit local authorities to cooperate with federal immigration police, often by refusing to hold people arrested on local charges past their release date at the request of immigration officers. Over 100 local governments around the country have adopted a variety of these polices
"New York City will always be the ultimate city of immigrants - the President's empty threats won't change that," New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio said in a statement.
But Trump seemed ready to step up his fight with the cities, vowing to "give them an unlimited supply" of immigrants from the border.
___
Associated Press writers Morgan Lee and Karen Matthews contributed to this report.
Copyright 2019
-
This kind of shit kills me, the media manipulation for democrats is blatant. Why is the quote from Trump the only time we see the words "illegal immigrants"?
Democrats often conflate legal immigration with illegal immigration to maintain their narrative.
-
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
Unfortunately, that's not an insurmountable problem as we've seen during the last several years.
-
I agree with some of what you say and other times I scratch my head and wonder if maybe you were facefucked too hard.
In this post here I would say that improving the wall we currently have would also include expanding it to cover more of the border.
By imaginary, I mean the length of the wall this lunatic wants. That's never gonna happen.
-
But you agree, walls work?
-
But you agree, walls work?
How can anyone agree that the work when: Roughly one-third of the U.S.-Mexico line, or 654 miles, has security fencing, according to extensive government reporting on the subject. It seems to me we can only predict how successful "the wall" might be at keeping out illegal immigrants.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2017/09/20/how-much-united-states-border-mexico-united-states-wall-built/647521001/
-
How can anyone agree that the work when: Roughly one-third of the U.S.-Mexico line, or 654 miles, has security fencing, according to extensive government reporting on the subject. It seems to me we can only predict how successful "the wall" might be at keeping out illegal immigrants.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2017/09/20/how-much-united-states-border-mexico-united-states-wall-built/647521001/
What exactly is "security fencing"?
-
How can anyone agree that the work when: Roughly one-third of the U.S.-Mexico line, or 654 miles, has security fencing, according to extensive government reporting on the subject. It seems to me we can only predict how successful "the wall" might be at keeping out illegal immigrants.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2017/09/20/how-much-united-states-border-mexico-united-states-wall-built/647521001/
Or you could go watch the video of Trump visiting SD recently where the supervisor said that since they put the wall up captures have gone down like 76%, and the attacks on border officers over 50%. Just a thought for you to learn, know what you're talking about, and have a cozy and pleasant evening sir.
-
What do u mean? Three things he can do in terms of the immigration problem?
1-improve the wall we have (Check- Not only improving, we ARE building new wall now that congress did not try to override his veto and the emergency declaration remains in place)
2-hire many MANY more officers (Check - they've been hiring pretty much since he came in, and even were going/did have some military go down there....they have to be trained, and once the wall is up they won't need as many)
3-do NOT go along with the Democrats and feel the need to spend money in OTHER fucking countries to give them a reason to want to stay in their home land. Don't like your country? Sucks--but you can't sneak in here. Come legally. (Check- He cut off the aid that was supposed to go to mexica and south america, because they were using it properly. *Added bonus, he threatened to shut down the border and the economy AND to start taxing the fuck out of their automobiles if they don't start protecting their border to protect ours in the next 12 months......they started right away)
I was talking just in general, since you seem to hate almost everything he does.....or you say so, but we can roll with just the border. Oddly, your answers here tell me you should love Trump right now! He must have picked your slip out of the suggestion box at the WH, because he's doing it all. If you watched Fox, or at least some alt YT stations instead of sticking to the left's bought and paid media puppets you'd have some perspective on what's really going on vs. what "you need to know"
-
Liberal queers like prudence and Vince and straw and Abe need to take I. All these illegals themselves
-
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
Sanctuary Cities Should Welcome Illegals, Unless Liberals Are Lying
Townhall.com ^ | April 14, 2019 | Derek Hunter
Posted on 4/14/2019, 6:24:09 AM by Kaslin
It was framed as a big scoop – the Washington Post headline blared, “White House proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities, targeting political foes.” “My God,” the blue checkmark brigade on Twitter gasped, “how dare the President of the United States even consider doing such a horrible thing?” But why? If liberals have been honest with the American public for the past few years, they not only should welcome every illegal alien they can find to their refuges, they should be thanking Donald Trump for his kindness to them.
Watching the story unfold was a bit odd, if you’ve paid even a little bit of attention to the debate over illegal immigration these last few years. Supposed journalists and “open-minded” progressive Democrats who’ve sworn six ways from Sunday that illegal aliens are our moral betters were outraged. Words like “dumping” and “punish” were used to describe the idea of releasing illegals, required by law to be set free, in jurisdictions that have laws protecting illegals from the consequences of their actions. You’d think a few more would be welcomed, considering those laws are designed to make them feel welcomed in the first place. You’d be wrong.
Almost to a person, anger was the order of the day from the left. But why?
Why wouldn’t cities like San Francisco welcome as many illegal aliens as possible? After all, we’ve been told by these very people, leaders in and from these sanctuary areas, that illegals commit fewer crimes than Americans and are an unbridled boon to the economy. Opposing their relocation would not only be missing an opportunity to lower the crime rate, but to bring about economic growth unrivaled since post-World War II.
Of course, they were lying to us. Only the most faithful, the people for whom MSNBC is too “fair,” ever really believed those lies. Everyone with more IQ points than fingers recognized these leftists were relieving themselves on the public while telling people it was raining. Now their bluff was called, and they folded like a cheap suit.
Still, the President should follow through on this idea. Make Democrats make the case against it. Let them explain how it’s “disrespectful” somehow and to whom, as Nancy Pelosi said.
The Mayor Oakland, California, Libby Schaaf, who made news last year by tipping off illegal alien criminals to ICE raids, shared her sentiments, which are common among the left. About the Post story, Schaaf said it was “(a)n outrageous abuse of power — using human beings to settle political scores. Our President wants to punish everyone; those who seek sanctuary in our country and those who provide it.”
Schaaf went so far as to call the idea “illegal, immoral, undemocratic, and racist,” though didn’t explain how. Granted, no one wants to move to Oakland, but how it’s racist remains a mystery.
In her local TV appearance, Schaaf repeated the standard lie that illegal immigrants “actually makes our city better and safer.” If that were so, why is she so outraged? Shouldn’t this idea be greeted with tickertape parades? Oakland isn’t exactly a safe city, the opportunity to reduce crime by importing people with higher moral character than the average American should be a net-plus, right?
The truth is illegal immigrants are a net drain on society. These aren’t people with PhDs and piles of seed money looking to create the next great start-up, they’re largely people who can’t speak English, with little to know education; many are illiterate in their native language. They will become the servant class for the liberal elite and their wealthy donors. More importantly to the left, they will be dependent on government.
Illegals, if liberals get their way, will count in the census. That means more federal money and continued overrepresentation in Democratic states. While Democrats support these things, they prefer it to happen under the radar. They don’t like it when crime and depressed wages can be traced to their policies. They don’t like it when people notice they’re picking up the tab for emergency rooms are flooded with non-English speakers, or schools have budget shortfalls and low test scores from the added cost of teaching kids who don’t speak the language. They hate reports gang activity and the inhuman violence of MS 13. They call all of these things racist to point out because there is no legitimate answer they can give.
But it’s never wealthy liberal areas impacted in these ways. The people inflicting this on their fellow Americans remain insulated from the consequences. It’s poor, mostly minority kids who suffer. It’s also poor minority kids who are inundated by these same liberal politicians and community leaders with the soul-crushing mantra that “the system is rigged against them.” They never mention how the system got “rigged,” they just attack Republicans and police as racist.
It wasn’t Republicans or the police who herded them into failing schools diverting resources to bilingual education. It wasn’t Republicans or police who keep entry level wages artificially low by flooding the market with unskilled labor. It wasn’t Republicans or the police who protect foreign gang members while neighborhoods are flooded with the opioids they peddle. To the extent that there is any rigging, the blame lies firmly with the people who set it up and have managed it for generations.
Of course, none of this matters. Minds will not be changed by words, no matter how true, from outside observers. This is the type of change that has to be realized from within. Bringing in more illegal aliens in the sunlight will shine some uncomfortable light on those problems, which is what liberals fear most.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and the calling of bluffs is as old as time. Both of those would be engaged if the Trump administration followed through with the plan reported Friday. That’s why liberals so desperately oppose it.
TOPICS: Culture/Socie
-
But you agree, walls work?
Somewhat. Yes. There HAS to be some sort of barrier at crucial KNOWN easily passable areas. Not the entire fucking thing. That's his ego that wants that.
Let's use some of that hi-tech REAL TIMEaerial surveillance the military used in Afghanistan . That could be up and running in 30 days I bet.
...for a tenth of the cost. Real eyes on real people trying to cross.
What's wrong with that idea?
-
Somewhat. Yes. There HAS to be some sort of barrier at crucial KNOWN easily passable areas. Not the entire fucking thing. That's his ego that wants that.
Let's use some of that hi-tech REAL TIMEaerial surveillance the military used in Afghanistan . That could be up and running in 30 days I bet.
...for a tenth of the cost. Real eyes on real people trying to cross.
What's wrong with that idea?
What is Illegal on sending them to sanctuary cities ?
-
Google it idiot.
-
Google it idiot.
arrhh I thought so....you dint know Morono :)
Just like TinHat Man....full of shite
-
I already answered it you jackass.
Pay attention
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
-
I already answered it you jackass.
Pay attention
where ? im a moron so do tell :D as it is no in this thread...
-
where ? im a moron so do tell :D as it is no in this thread...
I’d not bother with the Pathetic Mentally Wrong Wired Nature’s Fuckup
Arse Bandit & he’s Easily Offened & Annoyed by the Truth.
How Pleasing That is.
😂🤣😂
-
where ? im a moron so do tell :D as it is no in this thread...
Oh boy---lemmie explain how the internet works for you you fucking fuck.
It's LITERALLY THE THIRD POST
Right after the other moron Kazan asked "what's the problem?"
-
I’d not bother with the Pathetic Mentally Wrong Wired Nature’s Fuckup
Arse Bandit & he’s Easily Offened & Annoyed by the Truth.
How Pleasing That is.
😂🤣😂
Grammatically incorrect 'sentences' with unnecessary capitalization.
Speak the King's English or shut the fuck up.
-
The problem is that it's ILLEGAL.
You fucking MORON.
Go away.
This one ? this is explaining how it is illegal ?
-
Ha Ha Ha How Right I Am The Pathetic Mentally Wrong Wired Nature’s Fuckup
Arse Bandit is Easily Offened & Annoyed by the Truth.
How Pleasing That is.
😂🤣😂
The idiot, this is a message board & IT thinks it’s a English Lesson.
AIDS Soon to The Rescue.
-
This one ? this is explaining how it is illegal ?
Your fucking HELPLESS and weak.
Legal experts warned that any attempt to carry out a plan like the one Trump says he’s considering would run afoul of the Hatch Act, a 1939 federal law that bars executive branch employees from participating in certain types of political activity on government time or using the government’s resources for political purposes.
Trump’s Twitter posts and his comments leave little doubt that the rationale behind the proposal is political, Talbot said.
But, “he can’t use federal funds to create a program the purpose of which is political, just to embarrass other federal officials,” she said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/12/immigration-placing-migrants-sanctuary-cities-raises-legal-issues/3450858002/
-
That took me all of thirty fucking seconds to Google.
-
Somewhat. Yes. There HAS to be some sort of barrier at crucial KNOWN easily passable areas. Not the entire fucking thing. That's his ego that wants that.
Let's use some of that hi-tech REAL TIMEaerial surveillance the military used in Afghanistan . That could be up and running in 30 days I bet.
...for a tenth of the cost. Real eyes on real people trying to cross.
What's wrong with that idea?
So you want to watch them cross and not be able to stop them? Or are you suggesting building livable stations for border patrol officers to have sufficient access to those areas under surveillance?
-
Somewhat. Yes. There HAS to be some sort of barrier at crucial KNOWN easily passable areas. Not the entire fucking thing. That's his ego that wants that.
Let's use some of that hi-tech REAL TIMEaerial surveillance the military used in Afghanistan . That could be up and running in 30 days I bet.
...for a tenth of the cost. Real eyes on real people trying to cross.
What's wrong with that idea?
234 miles is Not the entire fucking thing
" hi-tech REAL TIMEaerial surveillance"
Would that be so the military could WATCH the illegal crossings and get a head count? How does that STOP it? ::)
-
But, “he can’t use federal funds to create a program the purpose of which is political, just to embarrass other federal officials,” she said. [/b][/i]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/12/immigration-placing-migrants-sanctuary-cities-raises-legal-issues/3450858002/
How would receiving illegal immigrants into sanctuary cities be embarrassing? I would think all of these cities would be excited to show the country how effective their ideas are and what a huge positive contribution to their cities illegal immigrants are.
-
What exactly is "security fencing"?
You know what it is if you'd followed the link I included in my post.
-
What is Illegal on sending them to sanctuary cities ?
I was wondering the same thing. A quick Internet search, did not produce clarity on this issue. The whole idea of sanctuary cities is very likely misunderstood. A sanctuary city's municipal laws tend to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation or prosecution, despite federal immigration law.
What this means is local authorities do not share information they collect about undocumented immigrants with USCIS. These folks can still be arrested for laws they break or crimes they commit by the local police. For example, if an undocumented immigrant is stopped for a traffic violation and the officer discovers they are an illegal immigrant, they still have to go through the appropriate process, such as paying a fine or in the case of a DUII, be jailed.
It seems to me when a immigrant seeking asylum is moved to a sanctuary city to await their hearing, USCIS already knows they are undocumented. What they won't know is if they commit any crimes while staying in a sanctuary city.
In my opinion, this is a massive hoax Trump is playing on the public with the intent of keeping folks riled up and fearing undocumented immigrants.
-
Your fucking HELPLESS and weak.
Legal experts warned that any attempt to carry out a plan like the one Trump says he’s considering would run afoul of the Hatch Act, a 1939 federal law that bars executive branch employees from participating in certain types of political activity on government time or using the government’s resources for political purposes.
Trump’s Twitter posts and his comments leave little doubt that the rationale behind the proposal is political, Talbot said.
But, “he can’t use federal funds to create a program the purpose of which is political, just to embarrass other federal officials,” she said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/12/immigration-placing-migrants-sanctuary-cities-raises-legal-issues/3450858002/
We have a Supreme Court to interpret these things. I'm no lawyer, but it makes perfect sense to argue that such a move is not about political gain but rather for the good of the rest of the nation's cities that are not breaking Federal anti-illegal immigrant laws, AND that those cities have repeatedly expressed a moral outrage at cities that don't break the laws like them. This would mean that the President would be very logical, correct, and within the scope of the law in assuming that those cities would prefer to have the illegals as residents vs. being held captive in "dog cages" while they play x-box, are fed, and tended to medically or let go to fend for themselves.
-
I was wondering the same thing. A quick Internet search, did not produce clarity on this issue. The whole idea of sanctuary cities is very likely misunderstood. A sanctuary city's municipal laws tend to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation or prosecution, despite federal immigration law.
What this means is local authorities do not share information they collect about undocumented immigrants with USCIS. These folks can still be arrested for laws they break or crimes they commit by the local police. For example, if an undocumented immigrant is stopped for a traffic violation and the officer discovers they are an illegal immigrant, they still have to go through the appropriate process, such as paying a fine or in the case of a DUII, be jailed.
It seems to me when a immigrant seeking asylum is moved to a sanctuary city to await their hearing, USCIS already knows they are undocumented. What they won't know is if they commit any crimes while staying in a sanctuary city.
In my opinion, this is a massive hoax Trump is playing on the public with the intent of keeping folks riled up and fearing undocumented immigrants.
I just don’t get why any city would want & keep any illegal immigrants
Let alone hide / not hand them over to the proper authorities.
Just how do they square the circle with them Being Illegals.
Where does this stop with these cities- Could they do the same for wanted
Criminals that they feel are wrongly accused & not hand them over or just
Ignore the law of the land.
-
You know what it is if you'd followed the link I included in my post.
Did you read your own link?
-
I just don’t get why any city would want & keep any illegal immigrants
Let alone hide / not hand them over to the proper authorities.
Just how do they square the circle with them Being Illegals.
Where does this stop with these cities- Could they do the same for wanted
Criminals that they feel are wrongly accused & not hand them over or just
Ignore the law of the land.
Political gain....the very reason that Prudence is trying to say that Trump doing that goes against the act is actually demonstration of another federal law being broken by these fucktard cities......whoops! :-X
-
Ha Ha Ha How Right I Am The Pathetic Mentally Wrong Wired Nature’s Fuckup
Arse Bandit is Easily Offened & Annoyed by the Truth.
How Pleasing That is.
😂🤣😂
The idiot, this is a message board & IT thinks it’s a English Lesson.
AIDS Soon to The Rescue.
Somewhat unlikely in first world countries. There are new medications which can render someone with HIV, undetectable based on their T-cell count. In many cases AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). is the result of untreated HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). Think of it as the 'end game'.
It can be easy to confuse HIV and AIDS. They are different diagnoses, but they do go hand-in-hand: HIV is a virus that can lead to a condition called AIDS, also known as stage 3 HIV. https://www.healthline.com/health/hiv-aids/hiv-vs-aids
-
Did you read your own link?
Funniest fucking post I've read all week! ;D
-
Your fucking HELPLESS and weak.
Legal experts warned that any attempt to carry out a plan like the one Trump says he’s considering would run afoul of the Hatch Act, a 1939 federal law that bars executive branch employees from participating in certain types of political activity on government time or using the government’s resources for political purposes.
Trump’s Twitter posts and his comments leave little doubt that the rationale behind the proposal is political, Talbot said.
But, “he can’t use federal funds to create a program the purpose of which is political, just to embarrass other federal officials,” she said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/12/immigration-placing-migrants-sanctuary-cities-raises-legal-issues/3450858002/
The problem with this is that nobody takes Trump's Twitter posts seriously. He can simply say it was all a big joke and folks will believe him.
-
Funniest fucking post I've read all week! ;D
The first paragraph blows his argument out of the water.
-
How would receiving illegal immigrants into sanctuary cities be embarrassing? I would think all of these cities would be excited to show the country how effective their ideas are and what a huge positive contribution to their cities illegal immigrants are.
Your sarcasm is funny. But it is also kind of pathetic. In the financial sense, that 'huge contribution' part usually comes after an immigrant becomes a naturalized citizen. It would not surprise me to find out that percentage wise, immigrants who become U.S. naturalized citizens are more likely to be successful than U.S. citizens.
Donald's grandfather, Friedrich Trump, was a 16-year-old out of work German barber when he arrived in New York, where he would eventually make a small fortune. One of the reasons he immigrated to the U.S. was to escape Germany's compulsory military service. Nobody in Donald Trump's immediate family ever served in the military. Donald's questionable bone spurs kept him out of the service.
While not the best citizens, all three men were successful in business.
-
234 miles is Not the entire fucking thing
" hi-tech REAL TIMEaerial surveillance"
Would that be so the military could WATCH the illegal crossings and get a head count? How does that STOP it? ::)
First off---your little 234 mile number doesn't appear anywhere near accurate.
What you're talking about is "The $5.7 billion that Trump has been fighting for would only be enough to build a fraction of the wall — about 234 miles of new steel barrier, according to a Jan. 6 letter from the Office of Management and Budget. It’s hardly enough to plug every hole, as Trump has recently said is required for a wall to be effective."
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/24/experts-say-trumps-border-wall-will-take-longer-than-he-claims.html
So right off the bat, that huge secure wall is a dud.
But lets keep it going...
Wait---here it is directly from the White House site because I'm sure you don't trust anything unless FOX says it.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Final-Shelby-1-6-19.pdf
Mind you, he originally wanted this:
Size of the wall: 1,150 miles long; 40 feet high; 10 feet deep into the ground; 1 foot wide--$25 BILLION!
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trumps-border-wall-how-much-it-will-actually-cost-according-to-a-statistician
I thought he was such a great negotiator? The Art of the Deal..blah..blah blah. Another dud
In its latest iteration, the wall would span 700 of the US-Mexico border’s 2,000 miles and cost nearly $18 billion to build..
https://qz.com/1172972/trumps-border-wall-keeps-getting-shorter-and-more-expensive/
He'd prob get more support if he laid out a FINAL plan detailing the length for all to see/reject.
As far as the high tech stuff--my plan (cuz i'm gonna run in 2020) would be to use satellites or cameras to spot people-- have manned stations --with helicopters-- every 100 miles. When they spot intruders--either turn em around right then and there or detain them.
-
Prudence for the WIN!
-
Somewhat unlikely in first world countries. There are new medications which can render someone with HIV, undetectable based on their T-cell count. In many cases AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). is the result of untreated HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). Think of it as the 'end game'.
It can be easy to confuse HIV and AIDS. They are different diagnoses, but they do go hand-in-hand: HIV is a virus that can lead to a condition called AIDS, also known as stage 3 HIV. https://www.healthline.com/health/hiv-aids/hiv-vs-aids
Thanks - I’m very aware of what HIV & AIDS are as I have a very good friend who is living with
HIV and has for 25+ yrs & as you Correctly stated with the T cell count & correct medications
His is undetectable.
He caught it in Africa when teaching over there from a local woman.
He had a quadruple heart bypass last year & has prostate cancer - 70 this year
And looks better now than he did before his heart attacks & surgery!!
I had to start him out as a complete beginner & just progress bit by bit
After 3mnths he was flying. He’s doing great.
And if he & his mrs don’t have enough to cope with she is awaiting a second
Kidney transplant & is on dialysis.
-
-
They should bring them to Pelosi’s house and let them wipe their asses with her expensive towels👍
-
Thanks - I’m very aware of what HIV & AIDS are as I have a very good friend who is living with
HIV and has for 25+ yrs & as you Correctly stated with the T cell count & correct medications
His is undetectable.
Something about this timeline is suspect to me.
But you can be sure as shit, I'm gonna ask the right person later this week when I see him.
-
There's already laws in place, that's why they're called ILLEGAL immigrants, you fucking moron.
I fail to understand why they would want so many illegals.
Let alone offer them sanctuary!!
-
They need to bring some of them to Vermont. They’re in dire need of racial diversity up there.
Vermont Population 2019 (Demographics, Maps, Graphs)
http://worldpopulationreview.com/states/vermont-population/
The racial diversity among the population residing in the state of Vermont is currently at 94.7% Caucasian, 1.9% two or more races, 1.5% Asian, 1.2% African American, .4% other races, and .3% Natives of North America.
-
Your fucking HELPLESS and weak.
Legal experts warned that any attempt to carry out a plan like the one Trump says he’s considering would run afoul of the Hatch Act, a 1939 federal law that bars executive branch employees from participating in certain types of political activity on government time or using the government’s resources for political purposes.
Trump’s Twitter posts and his comments leave little doubt that the rationale behind the proposal is political, Talbot said.
But, “he can’t use federal funds to create a program the purpose of which is political, just to embarrass other federal officials,” she said.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/12/immigration-placing-migrants-sanctuary-cities-raises-legal-issues/3450858002/
You are a sad case, they will re-located as there is No Room where they are, Why because of Libatards that is why....Illegal lol ::)
-
Prudence for the WIN!
Nope....
Israel is on it's second wall.....both paid for by U.S.
We've also agreed to spend $500 million for Jordan's wall. https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2018/03/22/gop-democrats-fully-fund-border-wall-jordanians/
I see no one bitching about these things, least of all Jewish people that tend to vote Democrat. Yet for some reason we have a problem with spending our own money on our own wall? Why?
Politics!
-
Nope....
Israel is on it's second wall.....both paid for by U.S.
We've also agreed to spend $500 million for Jordan's wall. https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2018/03/22/gop-democrats-fully-fund-border-wall-jordanians/
I see no one bitching about these things, least of all Jewish people that tend to vote Democrat. Yet for some reason we have a problem with spending our own money on our own wall? Why?
Politics!
Politics
Political Madness
-
Your sarcasm is funny. But it is also kind of pathetic. In the financial sense, that 'huge contribution' part usually comes after an immigrant becomes a naturalized citizen. It would not surprise me to find out that percentage wise, immigrants who become U.S. naturalized citizens are more likely to be successful than U.S. citizens.
Donald's grandfather, Friedrich Trump, was a 16-year-old out of work German barber when he arrived in New York, where he would eventually make a small fortune. One of the reasons he immigrated to the U.S. was to escape Germany's compulsory military service. Nobody in Donald Trump's immediate family ever served in the military. Donald's questionable bone spurs kept him out of the service.
While not the best citizens, all three men were successful in business.
What in the ever loving FUCK does that have to do with you liberals whining about getting the illegal immigrants you so covet?
-
What in the ever loving FUCK does that have to do with you liberals whining about getting the illegal immigrants you so covet?
Cucktards like him fail to take into account that their "dreams" made reality are nothing less than hideous nightmares.
I hope these dreams fill his and other cuck neighborhoods with fertilizer. They deserve the shit-storm they've squealed for and worse. NIMBY turds the lot of 'em. FTN.
-
The best punishment is libfaggets being forced to endure the policies they claim to be in favor of
-
What in the ever loving FUCK does that have to do with you liberals whining about getting the illegal immigrants you so covet?
When the fuck does he ever stay on point or make a good one?
The best punishment is libfaggets being forced to endure the policies they claim to be in favor of
100% Trump is calling their bluff, and look at them squirm now. Too late. Live by the sword, die by the sword. In the case of letting in all the islamics that want to come here, that saying will be literal for gays and women who talk back. They need to leave their bleeding hearts at home on election day, and vote with their head for once.......while they still have one. ;)
-
e · Search News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
Trump Just Drove A Mack Truck Through The Shameless Liberal Hypocrisy On Sanctuary Cities
Townhall.com ^ | April 15, 2019 | Scott Morefield
Posted on 4/15/2019, 6:22:39 AM by Kaslin
If the liberal attitude toward immigration and a host of other issues could be summed up with just one saying, it would be this one: “good for thee, but not for me.”
Safely tucked away inside their think tanks, tenured academic positions, lilly-white suburban enclaves, and ESPECIALLY behind their carefully crafted WALLS, it’s easy for liberals to virtue-signal about how the rest of us should be “compassionate” and agree to welcome every migrant who takes a notion to come to the United States. But when it comes to their own personal lives, their “money” is almost never anywhere in the vicinity of their big fat jabbering pie holes.
In other words, just like with the degree of charitable contributions from people all-too-eager to spend YOUR money, liberals are big fat hypocrites.
Such was the case last week when President Donald Trump brilliantly proposed - in a masterful troll job that may very well exceed all of his previous troll jobs - that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) transport illegal border-crossers to … wait for it ... sanctuary cities. Sure, it’ll sadly probably never happen, and likely the only reason Trump brought it up was to do exactly what it did - expose liberal hypocrisy. But even so, you’d think liberals would be ALL OVER the notion, right? This should be so EASY, given their worldview, so why not just call Trump’s bluff and say “bring them on in?” I mean, even allowing for the typical degree of liberal hypocrisy, the very definition of “sanctuary city” means that those in charge of designating their cities as such must want them to be, you know, a SANCTUARY for illegal immigrants. The more the merrier, they’re always saying, yet when the bad orange man proposes giving them what they supposedly want, right in their own backyards, they look that gift horse in the mouth like it’s got three eyes.
It’s almost like they think Mexico and Central America aren’t sending their best, or something.
Senator Amy Klobuchar accused Trump of “literally using human beings as pawns in a political game.” If that was the case, it was a checkmate move, Mr. President. Actress Alyssa Milano called the idea “sick and twisted.” Rep. Adam “Pencil-Neck” Schiff called it a “hare-brained scheme.” Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro waxed eloquent about “the cruelty of this administration,” because apparently the definition of “cruelty” is matching liberals up with the reality of their absurd utopian fantasies. CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin accused the Trump administration of treating illegals like a “pestilence to spread around the country,” which still begs the question: if they love them so much why would they care?
And then there was Cher, who did a Trump-prompted stark 180 on mass immigration by wondering via Twitter why Los Angeles and California, a city and state that aren’t “taking care of” their “own” should bring in and “take care of more.” This was a woman who, less than two years ago mind you, begged anyone who could to “take a dreamer” into their home. It’s hard to know how long it’ll be before “red-pilled Cher” issues the obligatory profuse apology, but for today at least it’s nice to see a ray of common sense pierce even the most brainwashed of souls.
There were plenty more where those came from, all perfectly summed up by Trump Deputy Director of Communications Matt Wolking, who tweeted: “Seeing left-wing media folks who advocate for open borders lose their minds because immigrants will bring violence and crime to their cities is ... quite a sight.”
Indeed. It reminds me of Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s now legendary question to Jorge Ramos last October when the Univision anchor was traveling with the first migrant caravan.
“How many of these migrants are you taking in personally into your home and are supporting once they get into the United States?” Carlson asked Ramos.
“I think that’s a great question and that’s precisely the kind of question that people like you ask when you don’t want to understand that this has nothing to do with individuals,” Ramos responded. After an awkward back and forth, Carlson asked him if he would simply take in “three” migrants, a question Ramos dodged yet again because he CLEARLY wasn’t about to take any of the migrants he supposedly cares so much about into his sprawling, walled (because of course it is) mansion. They might get the carpets dirty, after all.
To his credit, San Jose, California Mayor Sam Liccardo is the only liberal non-hypocrite in America right now. That’s because he offered to take any illegal immigrants President Trump would transfer to his city: “[Donald Trump] plans to release detained immigrants to [San Jose]??” Liccardo tweeted Friday. “We welcome any families willing to endure such extraordinary hardships and to take such tremendous risks to be a part of our great country.”
Liccardo’s non-hypocrisy, on this issue at least, stands in stark contrast to the rest of his ideological brethren. Liberals want to take your money and choose where to spend it, but don’t want to give it themselves. Liberals want walls for their mansions and their neighborhoods, but none for America. Liberals want armed guards and even guns for themselves, but would disarm ordinary Americans whose lives apparently aren’t as “valuable” as theirs.
And as Trump masterfully exposed, they want endless immigration from the Third World, but not anywhere near where they live.
-
e · Search News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.
Trump Just Drove A Mack Truck Through The Shameless Liberal Hypocrisy On Sanctuary Cities
Townhall.com ^ | April 15, 2019 | Scott Morefield
Posted on 4/15/2019, 6:22:39 AM by Kaslin
If the liberal attitude toward immigration and a host of other issues could be summed up with just one saying, it would be this one: “good for thee, but not for me.”
Safely tucked away inside their think tanks, tenured academic positions, lilly-white suburban enclaves, and ESPECIALLY behind their carefully crafted WALLS, it’s easy for liberals to virtue-signal about how the rest of us should be “compassionate” and agree to welcome every migrant who takes a notion to come to the United States. But when it comes to their own personal lives, their “money” is almost never anywhere in the vicinity of their big fat jabbering pie holes.
In other words, just like with the degree of charitable contributions from people all-too-eager to spend YOUR money, liberals are big fat hypocrites.
Such was the case last week when President Donald Trump brilliantly proposed - in a masterful troll job that may very well exceed all of his previous troll jobs - that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) transport illegal border-crossers to … wait for it ... sanctuary cities. Sure, it’ll sadly probably never happen, and likely the only reason Trump brought it up was to do exactly what it did - expose liberal hypocrisy. But even so, you’d think liberals would be ALL OVER the notion, right? This should be so EASY, given their worldview, so why not just call Trump’s bluff and say “bring them on in?” I mean, even allowing for the typical degree of liberal hypocrisy, the very definition of “sanctuary city” means that those in charge of designating their cities as such must want them to be, you know, a SANCTUARY for illegal immigrants. The more the merrier, they’re always saying, yet when the bad orange man proposes giving them what they supposedly want, right in their own backyards, they look that gift horse in the mouth like it’s got three eyes.
It’s almost like they think Mexico and Central America aren’t sending their best, or something.
Senator Amy Klobuchar accused Trump of “literally using human beings as pawns in a political game.” If that was the case, it was a checkmate move, Mr. President. Actress Alyssa Milano called the idea “sick and twisted.” Rep. Adam “Pencil-Neck” Schiff called it a “hare-brained scheme.” Democratic presidential candidate Julian Castro waxed eloquent about “the cruelty of this administration,” because apparently the definition of “cruelty” is matching liberals up with the reality of their absurd utopian fantasies. CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin accused the Trump administration of treating illegals like a “pestilence to spread around the country,” which still begs the question: if they love them so much why would they care?
And then there was Cher, who did a Trump-prompted stark 180 on mass immigration by wondering via Twitter why Los Angeles and California, a city and state that aren’t “taking care of” their “own” should bring in and “take care of more.” This was a woman who, less than two years ago mind you, begged anyone who could to “take a dreamer” into their home. It’s hard to know how long it’ll be before “red-pilled Cher” issues the obligatory profuse apology, but for today at least it’s nice to see a ray of common sense pierce even the most brainwashed of souls.
There were plenty more where those came from, all perfectly summed up by Trump Deputy Director of Communications Matt Wolking, who tweeted: “Seeing left-wing media folks who advocate for open borders lose their minds because immigrants will bring violence and crime to their cities is ... quite a sight.”
Indeed. It reminds me of Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s now legendary question to Jorge Ramos last October when the Univision anchor was traveling with the first migrant caravan.
“How many of these migrants are you taking in personally into your home and are supporting once they get into the United States?” Carlson asked Ramos.
“I think that’s a great question and that’s precisely the kind of question that people like you ask when you don’t want to understand that this has nothing to do with individuals,” Ramos responded. After an awkward back and forth, Carlson asked him if he would simply take in “three” migrants, a question Ramos dodged yet again because he CLEARLY wasn’t about to take any of the migrants he supposedly cares so much about into his sprawling, walled (because of course it is) mansion. They might get the carpets dirty, after all.
To his credit, San Jose, California Mayor Sam Liccardo is the only liberal non-hypocrite in America right now. That’s because he offered to take any illegal immigrants President Trump would transfer to his city: “[Donald Trump] plans to release detained immigrants to [San Jose]??” Liccardo tweeted Friday. “We welcome any families willing to endure such extraordinary hardships and to take such tremendous risks to be a part of our great country.”
Liccardo’s non-hypocrisy, on this issue at least, stands in stark contrast to the rest of his ideological brethren. Liberals want to take your money and choose where to spend it, but don’t want to give it themselves. Liberals want walls for their mansions and their neighborhoods, but none for America. Liberals want armed guards and even guns for themselves, but would disarm ordinary Americans whose lives apparently aren’t as “valuable” as theirs.
And as Trump masterfully exposed, they want endless immigration from the Third World, but not anywhere near where they live.
Excellent - The Cuckold Libturds Are Squirming in their own madness
They just can’t handle it - You either want to be a Sanctuary to Illegals or they don’t.
Their Hypocrisy is Laughable.
-
BREAKING NEWS: Trump announces illegal immigrants WILL be bussed to sanctuary cities..
Daily Mail UK ^ | April 15, 2019 | Emily Goodin
Posted on 4/15/2019, 1:31:11 PM by COUNTrecount
BREAKING NEWS: Trump announces illegal immigrants WILL be bussed to sanctuary cities and states in move designed to outrage Democrats
President Trump called on Congress to return to Washington D.C. to 'fix the immigration laws' as he struggles to full fill his key campaign promise
'Congress should come back to D.C. now and FIX THE IMMIGRATION LAWS!,' he tweeted on Monday morning
Trump made building a border wall and stemming the tide of illegal immigrants a key promise of his 2016 campaign
The administration has moved to shift the blame to Democrats
The White House is also considering alternative ideas - such as dumping illegal immigrants into sanctuary cities
There was a report Trump offered a presidential pardon to the top border agent if any measures he used to detainee immigrants was found to be outside the law
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said President Trump likes a plan to dump illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities
'Democrats have said they want these individuals into their communities so let's see if it works and everybody gets a win out of it,' she said
She denied the report about the pardon offer
'We're a country of laws and we have a president who supports that and is not asking anybody to do anything outside of those bounds,' she said
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
-
Racist Black Women Kimberly Klacik talking sense,,