Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Prudence on May 06, 2019, 11:11:31 AM
-
Now what guys??? Looks like he's the next Trump employee going down-/nohomo
That'll be another great day to be an American!
"The Attorney General’s failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report."
https://www.axios.com/house-judiciary-committee-bill-barr-contempt-proceedings-bb875dee-cafb-4c6f-80a8-346c327bad26.html
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
-
Little Miss Fake News duped again ::)
-
You posted basically the same thing on both threads. You serve no purpose and contribute nothing. Grow up.
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
-
Without the power to indict, it’s meaningless. Barr knows it and as a result doesn’t give a fuck.
-
Indict him for not producing unredacted copies of a report that ended that stupid conspiracy theory? *yawn*
-
Thin---indict whom?
Dos---there sure are a lot of people that see it otherwise. Everybody can't be wrong.
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
-
Thin---indict whom?
Dos---there sure are a lot of people that see it otherwise. Everybody can't be wrong.
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
Which is it? "A lot of people" or "everybody"?
-
Indict him for not producing copies of a paper they can freely already go look at? It's nonsense - a dog and phony show and must be totally embarrassing to be a registered Dem these days.
-
Which is it? "A lot of people" or "everybody"?
Semantics now Dos??
Come on.
-
Indict him for not producing copies of a paper they can freely already go look at? It's nonsense - a dog and phony show and must be totally embarrassing to be a registered Dem these days.
Tell me about it.
-
Semantics now Dos??
Come on.
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
Semantics? You're saying "a lot of people" = "everybody"?
-
Actually "everybody can't be wrong" is an expression --or so I thought.
Obviously EVERYBODY doesn't think he's wrong.
Stop it...stop it now dammit!
Oh hey---while I have you here Dos---did you by chance see what your fellow Mod said about your's truly??
Hmmm?? DId ya?? Check it out! I told ya I was a great guy. Borderline perfect human yes?
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
-
Actually "everybody can't be wrong" is an expression --or so I thought.
Obviously EVERYBODY doesn't think he's wrong.
Stop it...stop it now dammit!
Oh hey---while I have you here Dos---did you by chance see what your fellow Mod said about your's truly??
Hmmm?? DId ya?? Check it out! I told ya I was a great guy. Borderline perfect human yes?
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
Ok. Since (I presume) we're all adults, we should talk like adults. One of the things kids (and hacks) do quite often is use overstatements.
But to your point, whatever it is, who cares if "a lot of people" have an opinion that happens to be wrong? It's about quality and accuracy, not quantity. Just look at all the tinfoil hat dummies who said Trump is a Manchurian Candidate.
No I don't know what you're talking about regarding anything Ozmo or poly may or may not have said about you.
-
The link thingy is right there but ill post it here..
Give Prudence his due, outside of gagging on twink salami, he's been a solid contributor to getbig. -MODERATOR Chaos.
Wouldn't you agree?? I think you would.
It was also noted that I'm quite attractive, funny, outgoing, have excellent taste in men, and am in current first place for an honorary MOD title.
-
The link thingy is right there but ill post it here..
Give Prudence his due, outside of gagging on twink salami, he's been a solid contributor to getbig. -MODERATOR Chaos.
Wouldn't you agree?? I think you would.
It was also noted that I'm quite attractive, funny, outgoing, have excellent taste in men, and am in current first place for an honorary MOD title.
Didn't see that. I would remove the word "solid." You have contributed, but you've also trolled and sometimes spam the board. Couldn't care less about the personal stuff.
-
Meanie.
-
Thin---indict whom?
Dos---there sure are a lot of people that see it otherwise. Everybody can't be wrong.
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
It’s a toothless charge. It goes to the Executive Branch and runs into a wall.
-
Now what guys??? Looks like he's the next Trump employee going down-/nohomo
That'll be another great day to be an American!
"The Attorney General’s failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report."
https://www.axios.com/house-judiciary-committee-bill-barr-contempt-proceedings-bb875dee-cafb-4c6f-80a8-346c327bad26.html
Here's a shameless re-direct that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
Another waste of tax dollars and time by demoncrats. **yawwwn**
-
So Democrats think a Department of Justice employee is going to arrest his or her big boss?
-
Ok. Since (I presume) we're all adults, we should talk like adults. One of the things kids (and hacks) do quite often is use overstatements.
But to your point, whatever it is, who cares if "a lot of people" have an opinion that happens to be wrong? It's about quality and accuracy, not quantity. Just look at all the tinfoil hat dummies who said Trump is a Manchurian Candidate.
No I don't know what you're talking about regarding anything Ozmo or poly may or may not have said about you.
-Same for egomaniacs and buffoons. There is one person who immediately comes to mind because everything this person says is an overstatement. ;)
-
"The walls supposedly are always closing in on Donald Trump. The end is always beginning.
He’s going to quit. He’s going to be impeached and removed. He’s going to decide not to run again. Somehow or other, he’s going to relieve everyone of the responsibility of ever thinking of him again, and especially of the responsibility of defeating him in an election."
Get Over It — Trump’s Probably Not Going Anywhere
https://news.yahoo.com/over-trump-probably-not-going-113052516.html
-
So Democrats think a Department of Justice employee is going to arrest his or her big boss?
So are you suggesting Barr has the intestinal fortitude to wind up like Cohen and go to jail for Donald Trump? Barr knows Mueller is getting ready to retire, and Trump can in no way shape or form silence him then.
::edit::
I'm watching CNN right now--apparently that's another item up for debate.
Here's a shameless redirect that I'm going post at the end of all my posts for the rest of my life.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=653730.0
-
GOT EM!
20-12 HAHAHAH He's going down baby
I watched this whole thing on C-Span--RIDICULOUS approach the Republicans had..didnt work.
They suggested waiting until Mueller testified.
-
Now just 6 more years to work it's way through the courts and you've got him. ::)
-
Pretty sure it's a bad move to go against Barr in this way when he is actively investigating your partisan dirty deeds that led to the Mueller Report. Some would call that an attempt at obstruction, in the classic definition not the new CNN definition of course.
-
when he is actively investigating
Oh please..he's a Trump employee. He's partial to say the least.
Gott wonder why he's putting it all on the line for him tho.
-
Pretty sure it's a bad move to go against Barr in this way when he is actively investigating your partisan dirty deeds that led to the Mueller Report. Some would call that an attempt at obstruction, in the classic definition not the new CNN definition of course.
Obvious obstruction of an investigation. Hope he crucifies dems in the court system.
-
???
The Department of Justice reacted defiantly to Democrats’ vote on the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday to recommend that Attorney General William Barr be held in contempt of Congress for refusing to release the full and underrated report of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into “Russian collusion” during the 2016 election.
The Department of Justice was defiant, releasing a statement after the contempt vote that insisted: “The Attorney General could not comply with the House Judiciary Committee’s subpoena without violating the law … “Chairman Nadler’s actions have prematurely terminated the accommodation process and forced the President to assert executive privilege to preserve the status quo. No one, including Chairman Nadler and his Committee, will force the Department of Justice to break the law.”
The committee vote was 24-16 on straight party lines.
Nadler and the Democrats claimed that Barr had acted as the president’s “personal attorney,” and that he had failed to comply with a subpoena to supply the remaining 8 percent of the document (or 2 percent of the section on obstruction of justice).
Barr and the Department of Justice (DOJ) said that the subpoena was premature and that the attorney general could not legally release sections of the report that involved evidence presented before a grand jury. On Tuesday, with a contempt vote loooming, the DOJ recommended that the president exert executive privilege over the full Mueller report and the underlying evidence, which he did Wednesday morning.
During the hearing before the vote, Republicans supported the attorney general, with Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) reading Nadler his own quotes from the 1990s, when he argued against the release of the full report of Independent Counsel Kenneth Star after his investigation into President Bill Clinton.
The contempt issue will now move to the full House of Representatives for a decision. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) raised the prospect of using the jail in the U.S. Capitol to punish Trump administration officials for contempt, but as a criminal matter the contempt citation faces dim prospects: the DOJ itself would have to consider any congressional referral to follow up a contempt vote with criminal prosecution of the attorney general.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author of How Trump Won:
-
Y'all are a bunch of armchair critics.
-
Logic bombs are tough on the left. ;)
-
Just like Obama’s AG Holder was held in contempt of Congress for the Fast and Furious scandal and nothing happened to him, same with Barr, nothing will happen to him. Ironic that at the time Nadler called the vote “shameful and politically motivated” and walked out along with other Democrats. Of course being a slimy politician, now that the sides have changed, his mind also changed and apparently he doesn’t think the vote to hold Barr in contempt is “shameful” or “politically motivated”. Political theater as always.
-
Unfortunately you're probably right.
-
Uh, a major difference being Barr is doing his job where Holder obviously was doing something....let's just call it "other than lawful" or "extra-lawful" in lawyer-speak..
-
Did Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schiff put AG Barr in prison yet, or was it just more Democrat bullshit?
-
;D
AG Barr Mocks Pelosi to Her Face: “Madam Speaker, did you bring your handcuffs?”
by Kristinn Taylor May 15, 2019
Attorney General William Barr mocked Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to her face at a fallen police officer’s memorial gathering in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, according to a reports posted to Twitter by reporters, inlcuding Politico’s John Bresnahan. Barr and other Trump administration officials have been threatened with arrest for refusing demands by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives for the unredacted Mueller report and President Trump’s tax returns. Pelosi had recently commented about arresting Trump officials and locking them in a jail in the Capitol basement.
“AG Bill Barr reportedly mocked @SpeakerPelosi at an event honoring fallen police officers, per source. Barr shook hands w/Pelosi & said loudly “Madam Speaker, did you bring your handcuffs?” Pelosi shot back that the House Sergeant ar Arms was there if needed for an arrest”…./2 Barr laughed & walked away” . . . .
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/ag-barr-mocks-pelosi-to-her-face-madam-speaker-did-you-bring-your-handcuffs/
-
;D
AG Barr Mocks Pelosi to Her Face: “Madam Speaker, did you bring your handcuffs?”
by Kristinn Taylor May 15, 2019
Attorney General William Barr mocked Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to her face at a fallen police officer’s memorial gathering in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, according to a reports posted to Twitter by reporters, inlcuding Politico’s John Bresnahan. Barr and other Trump administration officials have been threatened with arrest for refusing demands by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives for the unredacted Mueller report and President Trump’s tax returns. Pelosi had recently commented about arresting Trump officials and locking them in a jail in the Capitol basement.
“AG Bill Barr reportedly mocked @SpeakerPelosi at an event honoring fallen police officers, per source. Barr shook hands w/Pelosi & said loudly “Madam Speaker, did you bring your handcuffs?” Pelosi shot back that the House Sergeant ar Arms was there if needed for an arrest”…./2 Barr laughed & walked away” . . . .
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/ag-barr-mocks-pelosi-to-her-face-madam-speaker-did-you-bring-your-handcuffs/
Yup. This is proof that many politicians and some administrators have fun at social gatherings and other official events.
-
Just like Obama’s AG Holder was held in contempt of Congress for the Fast and Furious scandal and nothing happened to him, same with Barr, nothing will happen to him. Ironic that at the time Nadler called the vote “shameful and politically motivated” and walked out along with other Democrats. Of course being a slimy politician, now that the sides have changed, his mind also changed and apparently he doesn’t think the vote to hold Barr in contempt is “shameful” or “politically motivated”. Political theater as always.
I agree that nothing will happen to Barr.
Holder was held in both criminal and civil contempt of congress, with some Democrats voting in favor of it.
He also ignored a Congressional subpoena.
-
Did Jerrold Nadler arrest anyone today?
He is the saving grace for the Democrat Party.
Him and Adam Schiff.