Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: SF1900 on August 24, 2019, 11:59:50 AM

Title: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: SF1900 on August 24, 2019, 11:59:50 AM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/david-hogg-suggests-compromise-on-gun-control

Gun control activist and mass shooting survivor David Hogg suggested that instead of outright banning AR-15-style rifles, a compromise can be made that would allow them to be regulated at the same level as machine guns.

CNN anchor Anderson Cooper said a mandatory buy back of "assault weapons," for which March For Our Lives came out in support Wednesday, will be used by gun owners to say that they were right to say Democrats want to take their guns away.

"Well, let’s think about it this way. These are weapons of war that never should have been on our streets in the first place. I can guarantee you that the framers of the Constitution never would imagine a weapon like the AR-15 being in the hands of an American citizen. They never would have imagined somebody going into a school," Hogg said.

"If this plan ends up in Congress, and they say a gun registry is a nonstarter or the assault weapons ban and mandatory gun buy back program are nonstarters, OK. Then maybe we start talking about reclassifying them and making sure you have the right permitting in place where you can still go and use them," Hogg continued. "But people aren’t going to have nearly as easy accessibility to them to go and commit mass shootings as they are currently."

Machine guns, which are capable of firing more than one bullet per trigger pull, and other types of weapons and accessories, such as short-barreled rifles and shotguns, along with suppressors, are classified as Class III items under the National Firearms Act and are regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

In order to obtain Class III items, purchasers are required to pay the ATF a $200 dollar transfer tax for weapons, and $5 for accessories. An additional form must be filled out, by which fingerprints and photos are submitted to the ATF and local law enforcement.

The average wait times for the forms to be approved by the ATF is a year.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 24, 2019, 12:03:52 PM
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: benchmstr on August 24, 2019, 12:28:23 PM
There should never be any compromise to constitutional rights..

Our laws are treasonous enough

Bench
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: chaos on August 24, 2019, 12:29:30 PM
David Hogg is a fucking moron and Anderson Cooper is a piece of shit. Or vice/versa
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 24, 2019, 12:34:15 PM
Two quick things.....

1.  You can't "buy back" something you never owned in the first place, and if it's mandatory then it is a confiscation.

2.  Which of our other God-given constitutionally protected rights should we start compromising?
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: benchmstr on August 24, 2019, 12:45:57 PM
Two quick things.....

1.  You can't "buy back" something you never owned in the first place, and if it's mandatory then it is a confiscation.

2.  Which of our other God-given constitutionally protected rights should we start compromising?
Number 2 is a trick question...the 2nd amendment is the only thing allowing you to keep ANY of your rights

Bench
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: JustPlaneJane on August 24, 2019, 12:59:40 PM
Yeah....I probably won’t be taking advice from an 18 year old know-nothing snowflake today.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: benchmstr on August 24, 2019, 01:05:08 PM
Yeah....I probably won’t be taking advice from an 18 year old know-nothing snowflake today.
Unfortunately you are... because the fring vote is who the left panders to....and who their policies are for... therefore people like him influence every aspect of your life...the battle is lost

Bench
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: JustPlaneJane on August 24, 2019, 01:08:03 PM
I haven’t lost any of my rights since David Hogg self-anointed himself as the Country’s gun control guru
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: benchmstr on August 24, 2019, 01:12:07 PM
I haven’t lost any of my rights since David Hogg self-anointed himself as the Country’s gun control guru
You have, and you don't even know it....

Bench
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: chaos on August 24, 2019, 01:25:28 PM
Number 2 is a trick question...the 2nd amendment is the only thing allowing you to keep ANY of your rights

Bench
I firmly agree with this statement.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 24, 2019, 01:26:57 PM
Liberals are just so inconsistent. They hate cops and the military but want them to be the only ones who have access to guns.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: chaos on August 24, 2019, 01:33:38 PM
Toxic femininity runs in his blood.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 24, 2019, 01:47:16 PM
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/david-hogg-suggests-compromise-on-gun-control

Gun control activist and mass shooting survivor David Hogg suggested that instead of outright banning AR-15-style rifles, a compromise can be made that would allow them to be regulated at the same level as machine guns.

CNN anchor Anderson Cooper said a mandatory buy back of "assault weapons," for which March For Our Lives came out in support Wednesday, will be used by gun owners to say that they were right to say Democrats want to take their guns away.

"Well, let’s think about it this way. These are weapons of war that never should have been on our streets in the first place. I can guarantee you that the framers of the Constitution never would imagine a weapon like the AR-15 being in the hands of an American citizen. They never would have imagined somebody going into a school," Hogg said.

"If this plan ends up in Congress, and they say a gun registry is a nonstarter or the assault weapons ban and mandatory gun buy back program are nonstarters, OK. Then maybe we start talking about reclassifying them and making sure you have the right permitting in place where you can still go and use them," Hogg continued. "But people aren’t going to have nearly as easy accessibility to them to go and commit mass shootings as they are currently."

Machine guns, which are capable of firing more than one bullet per trigger pull, and other types of weapons and accessories, such as short-barreled rifles and shotguns, along with suppressors, are classified as Class III items under the National Firearms Act and are regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

In order to obtain Class III items, purchasers are required to pay the ATF a $200 dollar transfer tax for weapons, and $5 for accessories. An additional form must be filled out, by which fingerprints and photos are submitted to the ATF and local law enforcement.

The average wait times for the forms to be approved by the ATF is a year.


Quote
Gun control activist and mass shooting survivor David Hogg suggested that instead of outright banning AR-15-style rifles, a compromise can be made that would allow them to be regulated at the same level as machine guns.

First outright lie.

com·pro·mise
/ˈkämprəˌmīz/
 Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions.
"an ability to listen to two sides in a dispute, and devise a compromise acceptable to both"
synonyms:   agreement, understanding, settlement, terms, accommodation; More


There is NO compromise. There is the law-abiding citizens getting punished for something an unhinged person was responsible for. We get nothing other than our rights trampled on.


Quote
CNN anchor Anderson Cooper said a mandatory buy back of "assault weapons," for which March For Our Lives came out in support Wednesday, will be used by gun owners to say that they were right to say Democrats want to take their guns away.

That's exactly what it is. Second outright lie. None of these rifles are " assault weapons " and mandatory buy backs are unconstitutional. And like   Pray_4_War said, it's confiscation.


Quote
"Well, let’s think about it this way. These are weapons of war that never should have been on our streets in the first place. I can guarantee you that the framers of the Constitution never would imagine a weapon like the AR-15 being in the hands of an American citizen. They never would have imagined somebody going into a school," Hogg said.

Biggest outright lie. AR15s are NOT weapons of war. This is a leftist/Dem/Gungrabber lie repeated often enough they believe it. NO army in the world uses semi-automatic AR15s as their small arms. His opinion is foisted as fact. There have been many AR15s on ' our streets ' for decades and no mass shootings with them , this is a recent phenomenon. And just as he can assert , I can guarantee you that the framers of the Constitution would have been using the AR15 is the Revolutionary war took place in 1976 as opposed to 1776. Weapons were always kept in the homes back then and guess what? You didn't have a mass shooting problem like we do today. What's that tell us? It's not a gun problem.


Quote
"If this plan ends up in Congress, and they say a gun registry is a nonstarter or the assault weapons ban and mandatory gun buy back program are nonstarters, OK. Then maybe we start talking about reclassifying them and making sure you have the right permitting in place where you can still go and use them," Hogg continued. "But people aren’t going to have nearly as easy accessibility to them to go and commit mass shootings as they are currently."

Machine guns, which are capable of firing more than one bullet per trigger pull, and other types of weapons and accessories, such as short-barreled rifles and shotguns, along with suppressors, are classified as Class III items under the National Firearms Act and are regulated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

In order to obtain Class III items, purchasers are required to pay the ATF a $200 dollar transfer tax for weapons, and $5 for accessories. An additional form must be filled out, by which fingerprints and photos are submitted to the ATF and local law enforcement.

The average wait times for the forms to be approved by the ATF is a year.



It is a nonstarter. The assault weapons ban had it's chance and it failed. 10 years and it accomplished nothing and confiscation is a nonstarter. Most " mass shootings " are done with pistols NOT rifles. More people die each year from hands & feet than ALL rifles combined which the AR15 is a sub-set of rifles. He wants semi-auto rifles to be classified as NFA weapons and that's just absurd. And if people wanted to commit a mass shooting all you would be doing is delaying it for a while. and they could just get behind the wheel of a truck and kill 80+ people like the driver in Nice

The kid is a lying mouth piece for the left.



Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Skeletor on August 24, 2019, 01:55:36 PM
1.  You can't "buy back" something you never owned in the first place, and if it's mandatory then it is a confiscation.

This.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Rascal full on August 24, 2019, 01:56:08 PM

First outright lie.

com·pro·mise
/ˈkämprəˌmīz/
 Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions.
"an ability to listen to two sides in a dispute, and devise a compromise acceptable to both"
synonyms:   agreement, understanding, settlement, terms, accommodation; More


There is NO compromise. There is the law-abiding citizens getting punished for something an unhinged person was responsible for. We get nothing other than our rights trampled on.



Yeah, similar to walking down the street and getting mugged. The guy takes your wallet which might have 100 bucks in it and gives you back 20 as a compromise.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 24, 2019, 02:10:43 PM
When the second amendment was drafted, the founding fathers had just finished fighting a guerrilla war against an oppressive government that was bigger and more powerful than they were.

In order to fight a war like that, it's imperative that you have capable weapons.  Anyone who says the founding fathers wouldn't have wanted us to have AR-15 rifles is full of shit.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Irongrip400 on August 24, 2019, 03:06:43 PM
Yeah....I probably won’t be taking advice from an 18 year old know-nothing snowflake today.

No today, but in 10-15 years when his generation rules over us you will. I firmly believe that if there is another civil war, it won’t be because of race or political party, it’ll be over the 2nd Amendment.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Tennisballz on August 24, 2019, 03:25:56 PM
How many people have been killed in mass shooting in the US over the past 20 years?  Maybe a thousand, if that?  I understand that they are horrid when they happen, but the number of people killed isn't really even statistically relevant.  Seems to me we should be focusing on the mental health system which is struggling big time.  Nobody ever talks about it and mental health problems have destroyed many lives through a laundry list of ways in addition to guns.  Serious question here, are we just pretending that mental health isn't the issue because as a society we don't want to acknowledge that different cultures and races just don't mix very well and everyone hates everyone?  At some point shouldn't we just be honest with ourselves??
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Dave D on August 24, 2019, 07:22:39 PM
No today, but in 10-15 years when his generation rules over us you will. I firmly believe that if there is another civil war, it won’t be because of race or political party, it’ll be over the 2nd Amendment.

A civil war over guns?

Gun owners will say you can take my gun over my dead body. Literally.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Purge_WTF on August 25, 2019, 05:05:20 AM
No today, but in 10-15 years when his generation rules over us you will.

 This. The Camera Hoggs and Trigglypuffs will be in charge in a few short years, and they're going to make AOC look moderate in comparison - pedophile rights, de facto discrimination against Whites, you name it.

 Best arm yourselves while you still can.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: che on August 25, 2019, 06:39:39 AM
When the second amendment was drafted, the founding fathers had just finished fighting a guerrilla war against an oppressive government that was bigger and more powerful than they were.

In order to fight a war like that, it's imperative that you have capable weapons.  Anyone who says the founding fathers wouldn't have wanted us to have AR-15 rifles is full of shit.
::) Oh brother


US ARMY  vs  Pray_4_War   ;D

(https://media.defense.gov/2003/May/09/2000599458/780/780/0/020510-F-9999J-007.JPG)

(https://static1.disfrazzes.com/productos/fusil-de-asalto-ak-47-de-62-cm-66169.jpg)
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: oldgolds on August 25, 2019, 06:41:58 AM
There are 310 million guns in the US...You could ban them today and there would still be guns available for 50 years. The only people without guns would be the law abiding people.
It's moronic to suggest gun control would make us safer.
Liberals don't have brains, they operate on emotion...
They want more laws passed just so they can "feel better"...
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: TheShape. on August 25, 2019, 07:18:34 AM
Every time we “compromise” on gun control measures, actual law abiding owners get stiffed and the gun grabbers win. Responsible gun owners are the only ones who lose, it’s a slow death to our 2nd amendment rights.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: mazrim on August 25, 2019, 08:03:49 AM
::) Oh brother


US ARMY  vs  Pray_4_War   ;D

(https://media.defense.gov/2003/May/09/2000599458/780/780/0/020510-F-9999J-007.JPG)

(https://static1.disfrazzes.com/productos/fusil-de-asalto-ak-47-de-62-cm-66169.jpg)
Very simplistic/illogical example.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Notomorrow on August 25, 2019, 08:47:34 AM
I can think of no more comfortable feeling than being in a place I'm not sure of, being a little scared, feeling unsafe, and encountering an old man with a war veteran patch on his jacket, with his grandkids openly carrying a handgun in the joint. And it ain't the old man or the grandkids that makes me feel comfortable.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 25, 2019, 09:15:34 AM
::) Oh brother


US ARMY  vs  Pray_4_War   ;D


You obviously haven't been paying attention to what has been happening in Afghanistan for the last 18 years.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Coach is Back! on August 25, 2019, 10:07:01 AM
The thread starter is looking for a triggered (no pun intended) response. Hogg is his go to for this. 2 pages and no response from him. You've been suckered. He doesn't even vote.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: che on August 25, 2019, 11:12:56 AM
You obviously haven't been paying attention to what has been happening in Afghanistan for the last 18 years.


If you think that Afghan Civilians (with their own guns ) fought wars  against the soviet Union , US...................... ...................etc


























(https://amydawsauthor.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/85878-you-are-so-dumb-meme-fo-real-i0zi.jpeg)
Title: RE: Anderson and Hogg
Post by: Rambone on August 25, 2019, 12:25:42 PM
Who fucks who?
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Matt on August 25, 2019, 01:18:28 PM
This Hogg is far more credible:
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: dearth on August 25, 2019, 04:38:27 PM
1) so the NRA is now the semantics police? ok, lets call it a "gun buy" program?
The NRA labels any gun legislation as "confiscation" and a meltdown ensues.

2) I hate to break it to you, but your God didn't create the United States constitution.
The only thing compromised is the perverted interpretation of the 2nd amendment, which does not guarantee that you can have an AR-15.
Sorry. Wayne LaPierre lied to you. Try and read the book.


Two quick things.....

1.  You can't "buy back" something you never owned in the first place, and if it's mandatory then it is a confiscation.

2.  Which of our other God-given constitutionally protected rights should we start compromising?
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 25, 2019, 05:29:09 PM
1) so the NRA is now the semantics police? ok, lets call it a "gun buy" program?
The NRA labels any gun legislation as "confiscation" and a meltdown ensues.

2) I hate to break it to you, but your God didn't create the United States constitution.
The only thing compromised is the perverted interpretation of the 2nd amendment, which does not guarantee that you can have an AR-15.
Sorry. Wayne LaPierre lied to you. Try and read the book.



Wrong. enjoy

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf


Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Moontrane on August 25, 2019, 06:14:38 PM
1) so the NRA is now the semantics police? ok, lets call it a "gun buy" program?
The NRA labels any gun legislation as "confiscation" and a meltdown ensues.

2) I hate to break it to you, but your God didn't create the United States constitution.
The only thing compromised is the perverted interpretation of the 2nd amendment, which does not guarantee that you can have an AR-15.
Sorry. Wayne LaPierre lied to you. Try and read the book.



What's wrong with an AR-15?

Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Dave D on August 25, 2019, 08:48:52 PM


2) I hate to break it to you, but your God didn't create the United States constitution.
The only thing compromised is the perverted interpretation of the 2nd amendment, which does not guarantee that you can have an AR-15.
Sorry. Wayne LaPierre lied to you. Try and read the book.



Sorry friend but you're mistaken.

The forefathers of this great country were led by God to establish our freedom, write the constitution and get the natives to cut their hair and wear pants.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: chaos on August 26, 2019, 06:14:19 PM
What's wrong with an AR-15?


Racist liberals see anything that is black as scary and intimidating.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Twaddle on August 26, 2019, 06:24:36 PM
What's wrong with an AR-15?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=656607.0;attach=778179;image)

Mini 14 = nice rifle

Got a couple of those.   8)
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: dearth on August 26, 2019, 07:29:58 PM
wow, whip out the heller decision. at least your NRA dues gives you some material.

i missed the part about the AR-15, maybe its an interpretation of this interpretation of the 2nd amendment.




Wrong. enjoy

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf



Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: dearth on August 26, 2019, 07:32:08 PM
Sorry friend but you're mistaken.

The forefathers of this great country were led by God to establish our freedom, write the constitution and get the natives to cut their hair and wear pants.



if the forefathers thought so highly of your god, they would have declared the US a mono religious state and not had created the catchphrase you commies love to distort "freedom of religion"

Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Dave D on August 26, 2019, 08:10:16 PM

if the forefathers thought so highly of your god, they would have declared the US a mono religious state and not had created the catchphrase you commies love to distort "freedom of religion"



Yes friend l, freedom to practice various denominations of the Christian faith, in order to break free from the oppression of the Catholic church.

It's safe to say they were successful.

One

Nation

Under

God
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 26, 2019, 08:11:35 PM

if the forefathers thought so highly of your god, they would have declared the US a mono religious state and not had created the catchphrase you commies love to distort "freedom of religion"



I feel sorry for you.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: SuperTed on August 27, 2019, 03:38:59 AM
No today, but in 10-15 years when his generation rules over us you will. I firmly believe that if there is another civil war, it won’t be because of race or political party, it’ll be over the 2nd Amendment.

I believe this too. This fight however will be mostly split on racial lines since polling has shown that all racial demographics outside of whites support stricter gun control. Brenton Tarrant mentioned this in his manifesto.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 27, 2019, 12:37:28 PM
wow, whip out the heller decision. at least your NRA dues gives you some material.

i missed the part about the AR-15, maybe its an interpretation of this interpretation of the 2nd amendment.





Not an NRA member , never was , never will be. You missed the part about firearms " in common use "
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: SOMEPARTS on August 27, 2019, 02:28:07 PM
I believe this too. This fight however will be mostly split on racial lines since polling has shown that all racial demographics outside of whites support stricter gun control. Brenton Tarrant mentioned this in his manifesto.


The whole thing is stupid because the people in the NRA don't have the issue with controlling themselves, but the laws are aimed at lawful gun owners as well as the fringe.

You can't legislate morality in a way that changes human nature - feel free to enter the demographics into that as you wish.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: dearth on August 27, 2019, 07:40:23 PM
Not an NRA member , never was , never will be. You missed the part about firearms " in common use "


thanks for proving my point about a perverted interpretation........th e very supreme court decision you cited.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: dearth on August 27, 2019, 07:41:45 PM
I feel sorry for you.

Have you read Corinthians 2 lately?
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: JustPlaneJane on August 27, 2019, 08:18:50 PM
You have, and you don't even know it....

Bench

Name one.
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Dokey111 on August 28, 2019, 04:57:40 PM
Is there a David Hogg supplement line and if so who's going to buy it out
Title: Re: David Hogg suggests compromise on gun control
Post by: Pray_4_War on August 28, 2019, 06:47:02 PM
Have you read Corinthians 2 lately?

Corinthians 2?  Is that the sequel to Corinthians?  lol.