Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Howard on November 15, 2019, 11:13:55 AM
-
https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-bret-baier-suggests-160600331.html?hl=1&noRedirect=1
-
https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-bret-baier-suggests-160600331.html?hl=1&noRedirect=1
Politics aside, why would any sitting US President harass a testifying witness via tweet in real time?
He's done this many times
Apparently Republicans are just fine with witness tampering and witness intimidation
Just add it to the long list of crimes that Republicans don't seem to object to any more
-
Things must not be going well today. Getbig even has its own lefty spin room. :D
-
She would have never known unless Schiff said so. It’s a moot point.
-
Things must not be going well today. Getbig even has its own lefty spin room. :D
It went horribly as predicted. The new keyword was bribery. They asked her if she ever witnessed any bribery or anything that be could be considered illegal and she said no.
Essentially, the most egregious act committed by the President was to hurt her feelings.
This sham becomes a bigger joke by the day.
-
Only a moron thinks that's tampering.
-
She would have never known unless Schiff said so. It’s a moot point.
Does she live in absolute seclusion? She would know what Trump tweeted regardless of Schiff spilling the beans.
-
Only a moron thinks that's tampering.
Thank you Judge Grape for your esteemed legal opinion.
-
Does she live in absolute seclusion? She would know what Trump tweeted regardless of Schiff spilling the beans.
Idiot, you can't 'tamper' with a witness after they've testified. As per usual.... Over your head.
-
Only a moron thinks that's tampering.
Yep. And the only reason she even knew about the tweet was because Schiff read it to her.
-
Idiot, you can't 'tamper' with a witness after they've testified. As per usual.... Over your head.
She would have never known unless Schiff said so. It’s a moot point.
Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.
-
Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.
No, idiot... How about you come back to this when any of that happens.
This is going no where, and nothing will come of it.
-
No, idiot... How about you come back to this when any of that happens.
This is going no where, and nothing will come of it.
You wish.
-
You wish.
You do. It will go nowhere, just like the Hilary email scandal.
-
You wish.
Actually, I wish I was wrong and you were going to be right (you won't).
This would really get interesting in the Senate where the Republicans control the flow of traffic.
But dumbascraps don't actually want that to happen, hence it will go know where.
-
He's done this many times
Apparently Republicans are just fine with witness tampering and witness intimidation
Just add it to the long list of crimes that Republicans don't seem to object to any more
Yes, fair play, democrats did it for 8 years under Osama, might as well take advantage of it now that a republican is in office.
-
Does she live in absolute seclusion? She would know what Trump tweeted regardless of Schiff spilling the beans.
You’re not that stupid. Think and have a little intellectual honesty
-
Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.
Dumbass, I meant during the hearing. Schiff purposely exploited it for theatrics for his clown show. Fuckers can’t come up with one impeachable offense so let’s play on the public’s sympathy. But at the end of the day no one gave a shit (DOW going above 28k is a pretty good indicator).
As we all (except the left) the Dems are collapsing
-
Actually, I wish I was wrong and you were going to be right (you won't).
This would really get interesting in the Senate where the Republicans control the flow of traffic.
But dumbascraps don't actually want that to happen, hence it will go know where.
I think you meant nowhere and not know where. Then again, you may know something the rest of us don't. :)
-
After watching her testimony, I don’t believe she’s even a witness. She didn’t witness anything. I have no idea why they even called her up there.
-
After watching her testimony, I don’t believe she’s even a witness. She didn’t witness anything. I have no idea why they even called her up there.
I believe what the committee chair is trying to do is build a complete picture of everything that went on during that time period related to the issue. Despite how the media presents it, not every witness is going to present some earth shattering and incriminating revelation.
The question is (I think), why did Trump fire her? Was it because she wasn't producing what Trump wanted, which was dirt on Biden and his son and having Volodymyr Zelensky go public with it? Did it have anything to do with pushing her aside and bringing in his own people, such as Giuliani and Sondland?
There may or may not be some ah ha moment in committee's arsenal. But if enough witnesses say the same thing even if it is hearsay, it makes Trump look pretty bad. Here's another thought, since Trump has difficulty controlling what he says and tweets they could be baiting him. In which case, it is working.
Lastly, this is not a trial, it is an inquiry meant to deteremine if the house wants to impeach Trump. The trial comes after that's happened and it goes to the Senate. There is probably a long road ahead before anything is decided....just my guess.
-
I think you meant nowhere and not know where. Then again, you may know something the rest of us don't. :)
Wow prime, you spotted a typo.... Is that your gotcha moment?
Played like a true democratic.
-
Trump’s tweet was typically Trumpian (take that as you will) but it ain’t witness tampering or intimidation.
-
After watching her testimony, I don’t believe she’s even a witness. She didn’t witness anything. I have no idea why they even called her up there.
They wanted her "feelings" ::) ::) ::) probably hoping they'd get a few tears for the cameras.
-
They wanted her "feelings" ::) ::) ::) probably hoping they'd get a few tears for the cameras.
The saddest she looked was when she was asked whether she had any evidence of presidential wrongdoing and she had to respond “No.”
-
Idiot, when the House impreaches Trump, the Senate trail is unavoidable according to the GOP. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. Marie Yovanovitch will be called to testify by the prosecution. Her time as a witness is not over yet. She could also be recalled by the House....Over you head.
Mmmm..pretty sure if it goes to Trial it becomes legal and political. That being said his tweet would probably be inadmissible along with the rest of the witnesses testimony due to hearsay. Jordan should have immediately backhanded Schiff on National TV. He would have been a hero
-
Is Donald Trump still President of the United States?
Asking for a friend.
I was wondering if he had been impeached yet?
LOL
FIVE MORE YEARS SUCKERS !!!!
-
Trump’s tweet was typically Trumpian (take that as you will) but it ain’t witness tampering or intimidation.
At the very least Trump's tweet was a stupid thing for him to do (take that as you will).
-
At the very least Trump's tweet was a stupid thing for him to do (take that as you will).
Drop dead, don't forget to kill yourself ;D
-
Is Donald Trump still President of the United States?
Asking for a friend.
I was wondering if he had been impeached yet?
LOL
FIVE MORE YEARS SUCKERS !!!!
;D ;D ;D
-
Mmmm..pretty sure if it goes to Trial it becomes legal and political. That being said his tweet would probably be inadmissible along with the rest of the witnesses testimony due to hearsay. Jordan should have immediately backhanded Schiff on National TV. He would have been a hero
I believe I made it clear that the Senate trial was a legal process. It's political because it is conducted by politicians. Trump's tweet is not hearsay. Everyone interested can read it firsthand. Jordan backhanding Schiff on National TV, would have been even more stupid than Trump's tweet. But then, you weren't being serious about this, were you?
-
;D ;D ;D
If I had balls I’d start teabagging a lot of liberals.
Although soyboy libidiots would probably enjoy that.
There are 1,815 days left in Donald Trump’s presidency.
-
If I had balls I’d start teabagging a lot of liberals.
Although soyboy libidiots would probably enjoy that.
There are 1,815 days left in Donald Trump’s presidency.
Yeah, they can't survive without Brazilian soylatte ............
Bad,bad news from Obama Iran ;D millions on the streets against muslim regime ...............
-
At the very least Trump's tweet was a stupid thing for him to do (take that as you will).
You say that as if it’s something new and unexpected.
-
Yes, fair play, democrats did it for 8 years under Osama, might as well take advantage of it now that a republican is in office.
examples?
-
examples?
You can start with the entire Obama years, go to the Bush years after that, then step back farther into the Clinton years and just keep going back if you 're too retarded to see it.
-
1,815 DAYS LEFT IN THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY
1,815 DAYS !!!!!
-
At the very least Trump's tweet was a stupid thing for him to do (take that as you will).
Conventional wisdom has been wrong on this.
-
Conventional wisdom has been wrong on this.
For witness tampering to have actually occurred, Yoyanovitch would have had to have been a direct witness to the crime.
Once again, being butthurt is not grounds for impeachment
-
I believe I made it clear that the Senate trial was a legal process. It's political because it is conducted by politicians. Trump's tweet is not hearsay. Everyone interested can read it firsthand. Jordan backhanding Schiff on National TV, would have been even more stupid than Trump's tweet. But then, you weren't being serious about this, were you?
It would be inadmissible and a matter of interpretation. The sissy left will exploit it and say it was a threat or bullying. The rest of the normal thinking world would know it’s just his opinion which he has a right too.
I’m all for Jordan backhanding Schiff then suplex his pedo ass to the ground
-
You can start with the entire Obama years, go to the Bush years after that, then step back farther into the Clinton years and just keep going back if you 're too retarded to see it.
Still no examples, just timelines.
-
Caught some of the hearing today. Vinan was testifying. The democrat congressmen spends his time kissing thanking him for his service yada yada yada. Then Radcliffe gets his turn and points out that no one in any of the witnesses transcripts mentions anything about bribery which is the charge of the day.
You almost feel bad for these witnesses. They’re obviously just establishment pawns.
-
Caught some of the hearing today. Vinan was testifying. The democrat congressmen spends his time kissing thanking him for his service yada yada yada. Then Radcliffe gets his turn and points out that no one in any of the witnesses transcripts mentions anything about bribery which is the charge of the day.
You almost feel bad for these witnesses. They’re obviously just establishment pawns.
Were any of the witnesses asked about bribery?
-
Were any of the witnesses asked about bribery?
Why do you keep chiming in when you don’t follow the events?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/marie-yovanovitch-president-trump-impeachment-hearing (https://www.foxnews.com/media/marie-yovanovitch-president-trump-impeachment-hearing)
Stewart: "I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?"
Yovanovitch: "No."
-
Why do you keep chiming in when you don’t follow the events?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/marie-yovanovitch-president-trump-impeachment-hearing (https://www.foxnews.com/media/marie-yovanovitch-president-trump-impeachment-hearing)
Stewart: "I would now feel compelled to ask you, Madam Ambassador, as you sit here before us, very simply and directly, do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes?"
Excuse me. You led with today's testimony not last week's when Yovanovitch testified.
Yovanovitch: "No."
-
At this point, only the most hard-core Trump haters would deny that this whole impeachment process has been anything other than a disaster for the Dems. Day of the after day of the Democrats coming up with air. It’s even backfiring because the only time in the word bribery hasn’t been mentioned has been in regards to Biden. I would bet that there is talk behind the scenes about shutting it down.
-
At this point, only the most hard-core Trump haters would deny that this whole impeachment process has been anything other than a disaster for the Dems. Day of the after day of the Democrats coming up with air. It’s even backfiring because the only time in the word bribery hasn’t been mentioned has been in regards to Biden. I would bet that there is talk behind the scenes about shutting it down.
Hold those thoughts because you may need them.
-
At this point, only the most hard-core Trump haters would deny that this whole impeachment process has been anything other than a disaster for the Dems. Day of the after day of the Democrats coming up with air. It’s even backfiring because the only time in the word bribery hasn’t been mentioned has been in regards to Biden. I would bet that there is talk behind the scenes about shutting it down.
I saw some repub today putting the dums on blast for changing the goals from quid pro quo to extortion to bribery and how the dums did this because "bribery" polls higher as an impeachable offense. ;D ;D
-
I saw some repub today putting the dums on blast for changing the goals from quid pro quo to extortion to bribery and how the dums did this because "bribery" polls higher as an impeachable offense. ;D ;D
This is a left-wing source. It’s a complete disaster for the Democrats.
Poll: Support for impeachment inquiry ticks down
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/support-trump-impeachment-inquiry-poll-071396
-
At this point, only the most hard-core Trump haters would deny that this whole impeachment process has been anything other than a disaster for the Dems. Day of the after day of the Democrats coming up with air. It’s even backfiring because the only time in the word bribery hasn’t been mentioned has been in regards to Biden. I would bet that there is talk behind the scenes about shutting it down.
Why would the Republicans let them Democrats shut this down?
Hell no...when Pelosi and Schiff try to shut this shit show down the Republicans should vote to send it to the Senate and then call Hillary, Schiff, Obama, and both Bidens to testify under oath.
-
Why would the Republicans let them Democrats shut this down?
Hell no...when Pelosi and Schiff try to shut this shit show down the Republicans should vote to send it to the Senate and then call Hillary, Schiff, Obama, and both Bidens to testify under oath.
It’s definitely come to the point where it’s in the best interest of the Republicans to keep it going. The witnesses are all career government employee gray people who witnessed nothing. It’s been a complete embarrassment for the Democrats.
-
It’s definitely come to the point where it’s in the best interest of the Republicans to keep it going. The witnesses are all career government employee gray people who witnessed nothing. It’s been a complete embarrassment for the Democrats.
If you say this 100 times, someone might believe it.
-
Look at Sondland to see real-time witness tampering. Guy flip flopped like a dying trout today.
-
Look at Sondland to see real-time witness tampering. Guy flip flopped like a dying trout today.
I partly agree. Sondland kept changing his tune. -Not sure how this translates to witness tampering.
-
It’s definitely come to the point where it’s in the best interest of the Republicans to keep it going. The witnesses are all career government employee gray people who witnessed nothing. It’s been a complete embarrassment for the Democrats.
Exactly
Put it in the Senate and then crush the living shit out of the lying Democrat Party
-
I partly agree. Sondland kept changing his tune. -Not sure how this translates to witness tampering.
This whole process has been coached. Take the sum of the testimony and the way it has been fabricatedextracted from these people.
-
Exactly
Put it in the Senate and then crush the living shit out of the lying Democrat Party
This is why I don’t think it will go to the Senate. The Democrats are in too weak of a position to give up the ball. Shifty is going to be called in to testify after claiming that he didn’t know or have any contact with the whistle blower. And can you imagine Biden’s idiot crackhead son having to testify, not to mention Biden himself, the guy who is actually guilty of the charges being hurled at Trump.
-
This is why I don’t think it will go to the Senate. The Democrats are in too weak of a position to give up the ball. Shifty is going to be called in to testify after claiming that he didn’t know or have any contact with the whistle blower. And can you imagine Biden’s idiot crackhead son having to testify, not to mention Biden himself, the guy who is actually guilty of the charges being hurled at Trump.
If you thought the Democrats were ever in control of the Ukraine quid pro quo then you were confused.
President Trump and Rudy Giuliani laid out the bait and the rats fell over themselves eating it.
Now they Democrats have lied to the country and went down the foreign collusion hole twice with Trump crushing them both times.
And as an added bonus, the Ukraine has picked up the investigation into the Burisma corruption again.
Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, and Jerrold Nadler will be remembered as three of the most incompetent politicians of all time
-
This whole process has been coached. Take the sum of the testimony and the way it has been fabricatedextracted from these people.
Extracted??? You mean like asking the witnesses questions? Isn't that what is done in an inquiry? Get it? Inquire = question.
-
Extracted??? You mean like asking the witnesses questions? Isn't that what is done in an inquiry? Get it? Inquire = question.
It all worked out in the end. Today was a disaster for Schiff.
-
It all worked out in the end. Today was a disaster for Schiff.
In your opinion.
-
It all worked out in the end. Today was a disaster for Schiff.
U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland disclosed that President Trump had told him on Sept. 9: "I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing."
Oooops.....that’s gonna leave a mark.
Do you think President Trump ever gets tired of making the Democrats look stupid?
-
Truth is Trump didn't know what quid pro quo meant until a week or so ago when everyone was saying it. Even now that he had someone look it up for him, he's unsure what it means exactly.
-
Team trump... Trump to win!!!
-
FYI, it happened DURING her testimony ...DOAH!
Yes, and someone giving testimony in court would not see it, as they would not have a phone, or access to media.
Unless of course, the dipshit chairman brought it up.
-
It all worked out in the end. Today was a disaster for Schiff.
In the pre-Internet era , the main stream media could’ve gotten away with controlling the information, reporting only what happened in the morning and nobody would’ve heard about what happened when the Republicans questioned Sondland. Then, the next day they would’ve just moved on to something else.
-
FYI, it happened DURING her testimony ...DOAH!
This is so dishonest. "It" was Schiff reading a tweet that the witness otherwise would not have known anything about. What a dumb argument.
-
This is so dishonest. "It" was Schiff reading a tweet that the witness otherwise would not have know anything about. What a dumb argument.
The there's the fact that your hero could have restrained himself....or maybe not. No tweet, nothing to discuss. See how that goes?
-
The there's the fact that your hero could have restrained himself....or maybe not. No tweet, nothing to discuss. See how that goes?
You would simply find something else to be outraged about as has been the case for three years and counting.
-
The there's the fact that your hero could have restrained himself....or maybe not. No tweet, nothing to discuss. See how that goes?
No. Stick with the facts. The witness had no idea about President Trump's tweet until Schiff read it to her.