Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Irongrip400 on January 30, 2020, 05:42:21 AM
-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/game-over-trump-declares-as-old-bolton-schiff-videos-surface-amid-senate-impeachment-trial/ar-BBZsDjq?ocid=spartanntp
The article is full of old clips of Schiff discrediting Bolton, quotes of Bolton admitting he would lie if he felt it was in the country's best interest and a few other things that could serve to discredit the statements we think are in Bolton's forthcoming book. How are we to believe any of these politicians when it seems all they do is lie?
-
You can't believe what a politician says.
Judge them by what they do.
-
You can't believe what a politician says.
Judge them by what they do.
Exactly, politicians say whatever they think will get them elected. What they accomplish, actually stand for while in office, is what counts and should be remembered on election day.
-
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/game-over-trump-declares-as-old-bolton-schiff-videos-surface-amid-senate-impeachment-trial/ar-BBZsDjq?ocid=spartanntp
The article is full of old clips of Schiff discrediting Bolton, quotes of Bolton admitting he would lie if he felt it was in the country's best interest and a few other things that could serve to discredit the statements we think are in Bolton's forthcoming book. How are we to believe any of these politicians when it seems all they do is lie?
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
-
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
Sondland confirmed nothing. Upon further questioning he said that he “Presumed.” Of course, MSLSD didn’t play that part of the testimony.
You seem to think that this is still in Congress. It’s not. The other side is going to get witnesses too and this shit is going to drag on for months and in the end you still lose.
I think Dems claiming to want witnesses is a bluff. When they don’t get them, they then can whine foul.
-
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
So spake our resident cockamole slurping twatling. No one here or in the real world actually likes you except those that don't matter here or in the real world. Fuck you, you terrorist sympathizer, aka DemocRat.
-
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
Nobody "fears" his testimony, drama queen, we're sick of you pieces of shit wasting our tax dollars because some old, ragged whore didn't "get her turn". ::)
-
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/10/17/1350479477094/Crying-baby-010.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=5cb13701ff858e2740519d838784346e)
-
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
Not true, but I still would have had no problem with him testifying.
Looks like the president may be acquitted by today.
-
No problem
Let's put him under oath and see what he says
We already have Trump, Mulvaney, and Sondland confirming a quid pro quo and we have multiple other witness testimony to as well
Let's see what the mustache man has to say
He's a lifelong Republcian and a Trump appointee so I can't see any reason why Republicans should fear his truthful testimony
The House had every opportunity to call witnesses. Too late, it's not the Senate's job.
-
Acquitted
Fully exonerated
Democrats are still losing to President Donald Trump, the greatest President in the history of the United States.
-
The House had every opportunity to call witnesses. Too late, it's not the Senate's job.
Yup, and the House was shady in the way they set this up.
Could have easily went the expedited court route, but wanted to slap the "blocking witness" tag on the Sentate, to sway public perception.
-
Yup, and the House was shady in the way they set this up.
Could have easily went the expedited court route, but wanted to slap the "blocking witness" tag on the Sentate, to sway public perception.
Even with a complicit mainstream media, the Democrats still had their farce of an impeachment exposed
-
Yup, and the House was shady in the way they set this up.
Could have easily went the expedited court route, but wanted to slap the "blocking witness" tag on the Sentate, to sway public perception.
In addition to the whistleblower scam. Funny how all the other witness the Dems trotted out didn’t have “Eric’s” concerns.
-
Yup, and the House was shady in the way they set this up.
Could have easily went the expedited court route, but wanted to slap the "blocking witness" tag on the Sentate, to sway public perception.
The only reason they went this route is so that during the 2020 election season they can run ads on TV and social media 24/7 about how they impeached Trump so he must be bad. ::)
-
The only reason they went this route is so that during the 2020 election season they can run ads on TV and social media 24/7 about how they impeached Trump so he must be bad. ::)
No one will remember anything but the stupidity of Pelosi, Schiff, Schumer, and Nadler when the DJIA hits 35,000 !
-
Yup. "Game over". Trump called right away.
Trump = Winning
-
Yup. "Game over". Trump called right away.
Trump = Winning
Yesterday BREXIT, today Trump ;D
-
Acquitted
Fully exonerated
Democrats are still losing to President Donald Trump, the greatest President in the history of the United States.
Yup. ;D
-
In addition to the whistleblower scam. Funny how all the other witness the Dems trotted out didn’t have “Eric’s” concerns.
(https://i.imgflip.com/3h0r35.jpg)
-
(https://i.imgflip.com/3h0r35.jpg)
So, will he be indicted for lying to Congress🤔