Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2020, 03:00:05 PM

Title: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2020, 03:00:05 PM
Predictions?   Are we even having an election in November?  Will Biden be able to put two complete sentences together during a debate?  Will President Trump be impeached again before November? 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 10, 2020, 07:32:47 PM
If....IF Biden is actually the nominee and if....IF they have a debate...

Biden will be crushed like we've never seen in modern politics. They will have to enact a mercy rule of sorts and call off the other usual debates, which will involve media calling Trump a bully. But Trump has no choice but to go pedal to the metal on the issues.

Trump is a master of media and TV - so even a remote debate will go terribly for Biden. His speech timing is plain awful even without the TV lag. I just can't imagine him in a debate at this level and he's not going to get better in 5-6 months. That weak Dem primary field was outperforming him.

Covid-19 blackout of politics is the best thing to happen to him. Like Hillary, the less you see him the better you like him.


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2020, 08:26:31 PM
If....IF Biden is actually the nominee and if....IF they have a debate...

Biden will be crushed like we've never seen in modern politics. They will have to enact a mercy rule of sorts and call off the other usual debates, which will involve media calling Trump a bully. But Trump has no choice but to go pedal to the metal on the issues.

Trump is a master of media and TV - so even a remote debate will go terribly for Biden. His speech timing is plain awful even without the TV lag. I just can't imagine him in a debate at this level and he's not going to get better in 5-6 months. That weak Dem primary field was outperforming him.

Covid-19 blackout of politics is the best thing to happen to him. Like Hillary, the less you see him the better you like him.




I agree although you know that is not how the media will report it.  Biden will likely try and be aggressive and say his incoherent comments with conviction and the media will say he sounded like MLK. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 10, 2020, 08:28:31 PM
I really hate when women do this.  This is really unfair to the man being accused. 

That said, I wonder if the media will actually start to cover this now? 

Biden accuser Tara Reade files criminal complaint over 1993 allegation
Rich McHugh
https://www.businessinsider.com/former-biden-staffer-tara-reade-files-sexual-assault-complaint-2020-4?utm_campaign=sf-insider-main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&fbclid=IwAR17dnK2pcEXfSP-Z6BA5wyITfdC7ltBnqrtUj-js3ubaC6nwLVmbYszlJ0
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 12, 2020, 08:54:58 AM
I really hate when women do this.  This is really unfair to the man being accused.  

That said, I wonder if the media will actually start to cover this now?  

Biden accuser Tara Reade files criminal complaint over 1993 allegation
Rich McHugh
https://www.businessinsider.com/former-biden-staffer-tara-reade-files-sexual-assault-complaint-2020-4?utm_campaign=sf-insider-main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&fbclid=IwAR17dnK2pcEXfSP-Z6BA5wyITfdC7ltBnqrtUj-js3ubaC6nwLVmbYszlJ0

On that note...

This is an actual tweet/quote from the New York Times:

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1249270881936904192 (https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1249270881936904192)

No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of our reporting, nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation. We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable


 ??? ??? ???

EDIT: They deleted the tweet/post
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 12, 2020, 08:59:07 AM
On that note...

This is an actual tweet/quote from the New York Times:

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1249270881936904192 (https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1249270881936904192)

No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of our reporting, nor did any former Biden staff corroborate Reade’s allegation. We found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Biden, beyond hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable


 ??? ??? ???



And they deleted the tweet/quote:

https://thepostmillennial.com/new-york-times-protects-joe-biden-from-sexual-assault-allegation (https://thepostmillennial.com/new-york-times-protects-joe-biden-from-sexual-assault-allegation)

however, the internet does not forget.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Princess L on April 13, 2020, 06:51:18 AM
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on April 13, 2020, 07:44:21 AM
Trump will be hurt by the current accepted meme of "not reacting in time".

But Biden is such an awful choice, it may not matter.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2020, 11:38:44 AM
I think the state polls matter much more than these national polls, but Biden is up 6 in the RCP average. 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_biden-6247.html
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on April 13, 2020, 11:41:10 AM
Bernie endorses Biden and proves what a monumental fraud he's always been.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2020, 11:59:28 AM
Bernie endorses Biden and proves what a monumental fraud he's always been.

Yep.

Bernie Sanders endorses Joe Biden after dropping out of the 2020 race
Sonam Sheth and Eliza Relman
https://www.businessinsider.com/bernie-sanders-endorses-joe-biden-2020-election-2020-4
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 13, 2020, 12:45:27 PM
Bernie endorses Biden and proves what a monumental fraud he's always been.
Yep.

Bernie Sanders endorses Joe Biden after dropping out of the 2020 race
Sonam Sheth and Eliza Relman
https://www.businessinsider.com/bernie-sanders-endorses-joe-biden-2020-election-2020-4

 :D

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: George Whorewell on April 13, 2020, 04:50:38 PM
:D



QFT
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2020, 11:13:16 PM
Welcome back Yamcha and George.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 13, 2020, 11:14:55 PM
Trump Campaign Posts Record-Setting Fundraising Totals for 1st Quarter, Dwarfing Biden's Numbers
By AP Reports
Published April 13, 2020

President Donald Trump’s record-setting fundraising pace slowed slightly amid the coronavirus outbreak but remained strong as he maintains a massive cash advantage over Democrats.

The Trump re-election campaign and the Republican National Committee raised more than $212 million in the first quarter of 2020, according to figures first obtained by The Associated Press, bringing their total to more than $677 million since 2017.

Their haul for March, even as the nation’s economy began grinding to a halt to slow the pandemic, was more than $63 million.

That represented a slowing from the more than $86 million raised in February but nonetheless was Trump’s second-best month ever, and it kept his campaign on pace to maintain its massive fundraising advantage over Democrats.

The pro-Trump effort will report having more than $240 million in the bank at the end of March — $40 million more than two months prior.

The campaign has planned to raise more than $1 billion among itself, the RNC and associated joint fundraising committees.

The fundraising totals come at a pivotal moment for the campaign, both as former Vice President Joe Biden became the presumptive Democratic nominee and as the coronavirus outbreak began to sweep the nation.

“President Trump’s unyielding commitment to the American people has shown time and again that he is the president we need to lead our country through this crisis, and it’s clear that voters are responding to his bold leadership,” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said.

“The enthusiasm for President Trump and our party remains strong, and we continue to be all systems go toward November,” she said.

Ronna McDaniel

@GOPChairwoman
.@realDonaldTrump’s unyielding commitment to the American people has shown time and again that he is the President we need to lead our country through this crisis.
 
It’s clear that voters are responding to his bold leadership.https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-rnc-raise-212-million-in-first-quarter-amid-impeachment-coronavirus …

Trump campaign, RNC raise $212 million in first quarter amid impeachment, coronavirus
President Trump’s reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee brought in more than $63 million in March, bringing their first-quarter fundraising total to more than $212 million amid...

foxnews.com
6,139
6:02 AM - Apr 13, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
3,018 people are talking about this
Democrats have yet to release their March hauls, but at the end of February, Biden’s campaign and the DNC held just roughly $20 million combined, accounting for debt held by the national party.

“Americans can see President Trump leading this nation through a serious crisis, and they are responding with their continued enthusiastic support for his reelection,” Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said.

The pandemic has effectively ceased traditional campaigning and fundraising, moving it to digital and other means.

Trump held his last formal fundraiser on March 9 in Florida and his last rally on March 2 in Charlotte, North Carolina, the city scheduled to host the Republican National Convention in late August.

Brad Parscale - Text TRUMP to 88022

@parscale
President @realDonaldTrump’s campaign was built on data & technology so we pivoted to all-virtual better than anyone.

Embedded video
7,508
2:31 AM - Apr 13, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
3,379 people are talking about this
To fill the gap, the Trump campaign has started to host near-daily video streams featuring prominent Trump surrogates and campaign officials and has continued to pepper supporters with digital fundraising requests.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ap-trumps-fundraising-slows-amid-outbreak-still-sets-records/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=teaparty&utm_campaign=lminetwork&utm_content=2020-04-13&fbclid=IwAR3_sjMeBQK1RF5-3vV9mtHSBBmPVCWak8z7niz2AB5M5_GMlhOW-M66Jx8
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: polychronopolous on April 14, 2020, 04:53:01 AM
Although he has put in a few swipes here and there, Trump has really held back on his attacks against Joe Biden. Unless he is asked a question pertaining to Biden he has been relatively quiet thus far.

I think he is just strategically waiting to unload on him when he has a world wide audience watching, just like he did with Jeb, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Maro Rubio and Hillary. He humiliated all those candidates with ease.

People may say they don't like a person who "acts like a bully" but when it is in comparison to an obviously incompetent and weak alternative, many of them are going to go with the more assertive alpha type with an established track record.

Then we must take Biden's weak poll numbers in states that are going to really count: Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.

Now move onto the Bernie Bro progressives that are seething mad after seeing their candidate go down in flames. They are bitter. Many of them do not want to "hold their noses" for a candidate they basically see as a right winger 1 mm to the left of Trump.

There is also a portion that believe this lady and her allegations of sexual misconduct by Biden.

There are so many strikes against Biden that it is really difficult to see him pulling this off and I think it will be highlighted when they step on the debate stage for the first time and Trump begins to unload those devastating haymakers.

I just see Biden standing there on stage with that blank, 80 year old Alzheimers patient, deer in a headlight look, with zero response whatsoever.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 14, 2020, 07:45:41 AM
Bernie Bros will be in mom's basement playing the latest video game on election day.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: George Whorewell on April 14, 2020, 07:55:41 AM
Before the pandemic I would've bet the bank Trump wins in a landslide.

Now I'll be he wins by about the same margin as 2016.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 14, 2020, 08:52:47 AM
Obama is endorsing Biden today.  8)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2020, 10:41:12 AM
Although he has put in a few swipes here and there, Trump has really held back on his attacks against Joe Biden. Unless he is asked a question pertaining to Biden he has been relatively quiet thus far.

I think he is just strategically waiting to unload on him when he has a world wide audience watching, just like he did with Jeb, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Maro Rubio and Hillary. He humiliated all those candidates with ease.

People may say they don't like a person who "acts like a bully" but when it is in comparison to an obviously incompetent and weak alternative, many of them are going to go with the more assertive alpha type with an established track record.

Then we must take Biden's weak poll numbers in states that are going to really count: Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania.

Now move onto the Bernie Bro progressives that are seething mad after seeing their candidate go down in flames. They are bitter. Many of them do not want to "hold their noses" for a candidate they basically see as a right winger 1 mm to the left of Trump.

There is also a portion that believe this lady and her allegations of sexual misconduct by Biden.

There are so many strikes against Biden that it is really difficult to see him pulling this off and I think it will be highlighted when they step on the debate stage for the first time and Trump begins to unload those devastating haymakers.

I just see Biden standing there on stage with that blank, 80 year old Alzheimers patient, deer in a headlight look, with zero response whatsoever.

Good points. 

I'm not sure the debates will be as devastating for Biden as they would be under normal circumstances because me might see some kind of "virtual" debate.  If that happens, it could mask Biden's inability to think on his feet and put completes sentences together. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2020, 10:42:03 AM
So he waits till Biden is the last man standing to endorse him.  Pathetic.

(https://scontent-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/93110502_10158852801444252_8445499759573073920_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=kzujXX0N4RgAX82aYtG&_nc_ht=scontent-bos3-1.xx&oh=497235fef6d848f8ab2f1b77a1015cef&oe=5EBA9660)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: George Whorewell on April 14, 2020, 12:38:17 PM
Welcome back Yamcha and George.

 ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 14, 2020, 12:40:41 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on April 14, 2020, 01:28:47 PM
Biden said yesterday he wants to put citizens on a path to citizenship.

This was on "conversation" type format with Bernie.

He'll gaffe no matter what.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: polychronopolous on April 14, 2020, 01:57:12 PM
Joe Rogan On Trump-Biden Matchup: ‘Like Mike Tyson Vs. A 3-Year-Old’


(https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2020/03/Joe-Rogan-Joe-Biden-scaled.jpg?auto=format&fit=crop&ixlib=react-8.6.4&h=546&w=970&q=23&dpr=4)


Podcast host Joe Rogan and comedian Brendan Schaub, who used to be an MMA fighter, went off on Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden late last week, saying that President Donald Trump is going to steamroll Biden in the election.

“It shows you how crazy the system is that they wanted him,” Rogan said. “That they wanted Biden to be their guy, that they don’t, they can’t admit that he’s in cognitive decline. I mean it’s very strange.”

“Look if someone wants to ask me questions about things that I understand like MMA or like comedy like if you want to ask me questions about things that I think about and talk about all the time, I could talk to you and really clearly about those things and make a lot of sense,” Rogan continued. “[Biden] can’t do that about politics and he’s been a politician forever … he’s a guy who’s suffering.”

“There’s no way he beats Trump,” Schaub said.

“He doesn’t beat Trump,” Rogan responded.

“No, those two faceoff, Trump’s gonna light him up like a Comedy Central Roast,” Schaub said.

“[Trump’s] already dismissing [Biden],” Rogan said. “He’s gonna destroy him. He’s gonna kill him man. I mean it’s such an easy target, it’s like Mike Tyson versus a three-year-old.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/joe-rogan-on-trump-biden-matchup-like-mike-tyson-vs-a-3-year-old
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on April 14, 2020, 03:10:28 PM
:o
Very nice to see this.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: polychronopolous on April 14, 2020, 04:01:34 PM
So he waits till Biden is the last man standing to endorse him.  Pathetic.

(https://scontent-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/93110502_10158852801444252_8445499759573073920_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=kzujXX0N4RgAX82aYtG&_nc_ht=scontent-bos3-1.xx&oh=497235fef6d848f8ab2f1b77a1015cef&oe=5EBA9660)

Classic Obama.

Leading from behind as always.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: B_B_C on April 14, 2020, 04:11:05 PM
.


"Biden is in reality poorly suited to the role of unifier, because he is a liar, a coward, and an opportunist whose own interests are not going to be served in the near term by blunting tribal differences but by emphasizing them"
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 14, 2020, 09:27:58 PM
Classic Obama.

Leading from behind as always.

Right?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Skeletor on April 14, 2020, 09:42:26 PM
So he waits till Biden is the last man standing to endorse him.  Pathetic.

(https://scontent-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/93110502_10158852801444252_8445499759573073920_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=kzujXX0N4RgAX82aYtG&_nc_ht=scontent-bos3-1.xx&oh=497235fef6d848f8ab2f1b77a1015cef&oe=5EBA9660)

(https://i.postimg.cc/SyX0DWNs/obamaendorsement-Copy.jpg?dl=1)

(https://i.postimg.cc/w948XWzZ/bidencornpop-Copy.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: polychronopolous on April 15, 2020, 04:33:01 AM
(https://i.postimg.cc/SyX0DWNs/obamaendorsement-Copy.jpg?dl=1)

(https://i.postimg.cc/w948XWzZ/bidencornpop-Copy.jpg)

"No Grandpa, not the local community pool gangster from the 60s, this guy was actually United States President once"
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 15, 2020, 07:55:31 AM
you guys didn't tell me that Straw met Joe Biden!!!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 15, 2020, 09:42:31 PM
you guys didn't tell me that Straw met Joe Biden!!!



That looks like Howard. HA
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: polychronopolous on April 16, 2020, 06:55:17 AM
Stacey Abrams says she would be an 'excellent running mate' to Joe Biden


(https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181116180415-stacey-abrams-large-169.jpg)


Washington (CNN)Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams says she would be "honored" to be chosen as former Vice President Joe Biden's running mate.

"I would be an excellent running mate," Abrams told Elle magazine in an interview published Wednesday.

"I have the capacity to attract voters by motivating typically ignored communities," Abrams said. "I have a strong history of executive and management experience in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. I've spent 25 years in independent study of foreign policy. I am ready to help advance an agenda of restoring America's place in the world. If I am selected, I am prepared and excited to serve."

Abrams' public and direct pitch for the position is unconventional; vice presidential prospects in the past have typically been more guarded when asked about being chosen for the role.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/stacey-abrams-vice-president-joe-biden/index.html
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tonymctones on April 16, 2020, 05:51:21 PM
Stacey Abrams says she would be an 'excellent running mate' to Joe Biden
wont happen, he already has the african american vote, my money is on elizabeth warren to help bring in the far far left


(https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181116180415-stacey-abrams-large-169.jpg)


Washington (CNN)Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams says she would be "honored" to be chosen as former Vice President Joe Biden's running mate.

"I would be an excellent running mate," Abrams told Elle magazine in an interview published Wednesday.

"I have the capacity to attract voters by motivating typically ignored communities," Abrams said. "I have a strong history of executive and management experience in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. I've spent 25 years in independent study of foreign policy. I am ready to help advance an agenda of restoring America's place in the world. If I am selected, I am prepared and excited to serve."

Abrams' public and direct pitch for the position is unconventional; vice presidential prospects in the past have typically been more guarded when asked about being chosen for the role.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/stacey-abrams-vice-president-joe-biden/index.html
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: AbrahamG on April 16, 2020, 05:56:38 PM
Sounds like stormfront getbig nation is getting a wee bit nervous. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on April 16, 2020, 06:09:32 PM
Stacey Abrams says she would be an 'excellent running mate' to Joe Biden


(https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181116180415-stacey-abrams-large-169.jpg)


Washington (CNN)Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams says she would be "honored" to be chosen as former Vice President Joe Biden's running mate.

"I would be an excellent running mate," Abrams told Elle magazine in an interview published Wednesday.

"I have the capacity to attract voters by motivating typically ignored communities," Abrams said. "I have a strong history of executive and management experience in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. I've spent 25 years in independent study of foreign policy. I am ready to help advance an agenda of restoring America's place in the world. If I am selected, I am prepared and excited to serve."

Abrams' public and direct pitch for the position is unconventional; vice presidential prospects in the past have typically been more guarded when asked about being chosen for the role.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/stacey-abrams-vice-president-joe-biden/index.html

She knows what she knows, and that’s all she needs to know – don’t doubt her for a second!  ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Irongrip400 on April 18, 2020, 05:56:33 AM
Sounds like stormfront getbig nation is getting a wee bit nervous. 

Only if he picks Michelle Obama as his VP.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Skeletor on April 19, 2020, 06:43:34 PM
"Um, you know, there's a uh, during World War... Two, uh, you know, where Roosevelt came up with a thing that that uh, you know, was totally different than a, than the, the, it's called, he's called it a, you know, the World War Two, he had the World, the War Production Board."

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 20, 2020, 07:17:44 AM
"Um, you know, there's a uh, during World War... Two, uh, you know, where Roosevelt came up with a thing that that uh, you know, was totally different than a, than the, the, it's called, he's called it a, you know, the World War Two, he had the World, the War Production Board."



that's a mind that will lead us to greatness!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: JustPlaneJane on April 20, 2020, 08:56:59 AM
Stacey Abrams says she would be an 'excellent running mate' to Joe Biden


(https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181116180415-stacey-abrams-large-169.jpg)


Washington (CNN)Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams says she would be "honored" to be chosen as former Vice President Joe Biden's running mate.

"I would be an excellent running mate," Abrams told Elle magazine in an interview published Wednesday.

"I have the capacity to attract voters by motivating typically ignored communities," Abrams said. "I have a strong history of executive and management experience in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. I've spent 25 years in independent study of foreign policy. I am ready to help advance an agenda of restoring America's place in the world. If I am selected, I am prepared and excited to serve."

Abrams' public and direct pitch for the position is unconventional; vice presidential prospects in the past have typically been more guarded when asked about being chosen for the role.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/stacey-abrams-vice-president-joe-biden/index.html

The words “Stacey Abrams” and “running” should never appear in a sentence together.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Board_SHERIF on April 20, 2020, 05:02:18 PM
of course Trump will demolish Biden in the debates.

But he has a major problem with how he handled the Pandemic, and the Gay Muslim will be campaigning with Creepster Biden.   I think Hussein will do 95 % of the talking and then give Biden fail proof one liners. Fake News Media will present it as "Trump failed with the Pandemic" and Biden is razor sharp.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 21, 2020, 02:56:04 PM
that's a mind that will lead us to greatness!


Socialism is collectivism. His campaign statement makes perfect sense.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 21, 2020, 02:57:56 PM
of course Trump will demolish Biden in the debates.

But he has a major problem with how he handled the Pandemic, and the Gay Muslim will be campaigning with Creepster Biden.   I think Hussein will do 95 % of the talking and then give Biden fail proof one liners. Fake News Media will present it as "Trump failed with the Pandemic" and Biden is razor sharp.




The governors are royally screwing up - their desire for power and face time is putting a lot of blame on them.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on April 21, 2020, 03:24:30 PM
Trump will still need to overcome the stigma that he didn't react in time.

The Dan Crenshaw video where he lays out the timeline is very convincing, but more people will need to see it.

I'm sure the WaPo and NYT etc are poking holes in it as we speak.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: JustPlaneJane on April 21, 2020, 05:43:36 PM
of course Trump will demolish Biden in the debates.

But he has a major problem with how he handled the Pandemic, and the Gay Muslim will be campaigning with Creepster Biden.   I think Hussein will do 95 % of the talking and then give Biden fail proof one liners. Fake News Media will present it as "Trump failed with the Pandemic" and Biden is razor sharp.


Do you not realize it was the absolutely complete incompetence of Barry Sotero (and Hillary Clinton) that put Donald Trump in the White House the first time?

The fake news media crying wolf on the coronavirus pandemic isn’t going to begin to offset how sick and fed up the country is with the bullshit FISA Abuse, Kavanaugh Hearing, Russian Collusion, Hunter Biden and Burisma, Quid Pro Quo Joe, Fake Impeachment, Withholding CARE Stimulus, and Joe Biden’s Sexual Assault crap the Democrats are on the hook for in the past 3 years.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 21, 2020, 07:49:47 PM
Obama didn't get himself elected - the DNC and their media connections did.

There's just not enough left to work with when it comes to Biden.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: James on April 22, 2020, 02:06:53 PM
" the kids used to reach in the pool and the rub the hair down and watch the hair come back up again. So I learned about roaches, and about kids jumping on my lap.  And I loved kids jumping on my lap." - Joe Biden





Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Soul Crusher on April 24, 2020, 05:39:25 AM
Usama bin Laden wanted to kill Obama so 'totally unprepared' Biden would be president, declassified docs show
Fox News ^ | April 22 2020 | Gregg Re
Posted on 4/23/2020, 1:57:27 AM by knighthawk

Usama bin Laden wanted to assassinate then-President Barack Obama so that the "totally unprepared" Joe Biden would take over as president and plunge the United States "into a crisis," according to documents seized from bin Laden's Pakistan compound when he was killed in May 2011.

The secretive documents, first reported in 2012 by The Washington Post, outlined a plan to take out Obama and top U.S. military commander David Petraeus as they traveled by plane.

“The reason for concentrating on them is that Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him automatically will make [Vice President] Biden take over the presidency," bin Laden wrote to a top deputy. "Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the U.S. into a crisis. As for Petraeus, he is the man of the hour ... and killing him would alter the war's path" in Afghanistan.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on April 25, 2020, 04:06:32 PM
Usama bin Laden wanted to kill Obama so 'totally unprepared' Biden would be president, declassified docs show
Fox News ^ | April 22 2020 | Gregg Re
Posted on 4/23/2020, 1:57:27 AM by knighthawk

Usama bin Laden wanted to assassinate then-President Barack Obama so that the "totally unprepared" Joe Biden would take over as president and plunge the United States "into a crisis," according to documents seized from bin Laden's Pakistan compound when he was killed in May 2011.

The secretive documents, first reported in 2012 by The Washington Post, outlined a plan to take out Obama and top U.S. military commander David Petraeus as they traveled by plane.

“The reason for concentrating on them is that Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him automatically will make [Vice President] Biden take over the presidency," bin Laden wrote to a top deputy. "Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the U.S. into a crisis. As for Petraeus, he is the man of the hour ... and killing him would alter the war's path" in Afghanistan.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


And can you imagine today... If Bin Laden was alive, he would give direct orders to his followers that anyone who touches a "hair" on Trumps head would have their family killed before their eyes. Sadly, 49% of Americans gave Bin Laden exactly what he wanted posthumously.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on April 25, 2020, 05:01:07 PM

And can you imagine today... If Bin Laden was alive, he would give direct orders to his followers that anyone who touches a "hair" on Trumps head would have their family killed before their eyes. Sadly, 49% of Americans gave Bin Laden exactly what he wanted posthumously.
LMFAO. I've missed you're utterly asinine posts. :D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on April 25, 2020, 05:02:00 PM
Stacey Abrams says she would be an 'excellent running mate' to Joe Biden


(https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181116180415-stacey-abrams-large-169.jpg)


Washington (CNN)Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams says she would be "honored" to be chosen as former Vice President Joe Biden's running mate.

"I would be an excellent running mate," Abrams told Elle magazine in an interview published Wednesday.

"I have the capacity to attract voters by motivating typically ignored communities," Abrams said. "I have a strong history of executive and management experience in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors. I've spent 25 years in independent study of foreign policy. I am ready to help advance an agenda of restoring America's place in the world. If I am selected, I am prepared and excited to serve."

Abrams' public and direct pitch for the position is unconventional; vice presidential prospects in the past have typically been more guarded when asked about being chosen for the role.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/stacey-abrams-vice-president-joe-biden/index.html
Only thing she'd be excellent at is cover during a gunfight.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: pamith on April 26, 2020, 06:49:27 AM
Trump will win again
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on April 26, 2020, 07:46:39 AM
Melania Trump’s Birthday Gift
Nothing says “happy birthday” like the zip codes, email addresses, and mobile numbers of 1 million Americans.

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/2020/04/info_form/7f6dcd027.png

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/2020/04/Wait_before_you_go/dce5ecec1.png
Think she'll put all that in her contact list?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on April 26, 2020, 08:11:04 AM
doubt it
She is just a some times useful moll
Aren't all first ladies?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: pamith on April 26, 2020, 09:24:41 AM
The irony is that the democrats reject God, and that's why they are in the mess they are in
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on April 26, 2020, 11:36:53 AM
Aren't all first ladies?

Eleanor Roosevelt

She was no raving beauty but she was highly intelligent and motivated.

(https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/kHEpE4OlUzjlGjgtEBBBiV6fbkQ=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Eleanor-Roosevelt-58e803625f9b58ef7e6c577d.jpg)

Eleanor Roosevelt is considered by many to be America's most inspiring and influential first lady. She married Franklin Roosevelt in 1905 and was one of the first to use her role as first lady to advance causes she found significant. She fought for New Deal proposals, civil rights, and the rights of women. She believed education and equal opportunities should be guaranteed for all. After her husband died, Eleanor Roosevelt was on the board of directors for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). She was a leader in the formation of the United Nations at the end of World War II. She helped draft the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and was the first chairman of the UN Human Rights Commission.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on April 26, 2020, 05:09:18 PM
The irony is that the democrats reject God, and that's why they are in the mess they are in

Are you being serious?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on April 27, 2020, 12:01:28 AM
The irony is that the democrats reject God, and that's why they are in the mess they are in

And you know this because.....?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on April 27, 2020, 11:00:16 AM
Eleanor Roosevelt

She was no raving beauty but she was highly intelligent and motivated.

(https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/kHEpE4OlUzjlGjgtEBBBiV6fbkQ=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Eleanor-Roosevelt-58e803625f9b58ef7e6c577d.jpg)

Eleanor Roosevelt is considered by many to be America's most inspiring and influential first lady. She married Franklin Roosevelt in 1905 and was one of the first to use her role as first lady to advance causes she found significant. She fought for New Deal proposals, civil rights, and the rights of women. She believed education and equal opportunities should be guaranteed for all. After her husband died, Eleanor Roosevelt was on the board of directors for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). She was a leader in the formation of the United Nations at the end of World War II. She helped draft the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and was the first chairman of the UN Human Rights Commission.

Big Dyke.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP6catGJTq0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP6catGJTq0)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: OzmO on April 27, 2020, 02:03:17 PM
The irony is that the democrats reject God, and that's why they are in the mess they are in
::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on April 27, 2020, 02:52:16 PM
Big Dyke.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP6catGJTq0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP6catGJTq0)

Yeah well, I don't see where that is relevant to this discussion.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on April 27, 2020, 10:38:50 PM
And you know this because.....?






The woman leans over the the chairperson and says "You gotta rule, and then you've gotta let them do what they're gonna do.".

This is the most corrupt party. The radicalization of the people in the party shows here. Problem is the radicals are too stupid to understand that you don't actually come out and say what you believe so you can keep the old, white, self hating donor money flowing.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: IroNat on April 28, 2020, 04:13:21 AM
Eleanor Roosevelt

She was no raving beauty but she was highly intelligent and motivated.

(https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/kHEpE4OlUzjlGjgtEBBBiV6fbkQ=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Eleanor-Roosevelt-58e803625f9b58ef7e6c577d.jpg)

Eleanor Roosevelt is considered by many to be America's most inspiring and influential first lady. She married Franklin Roosevelt in 1905 and was one of the first to use her role as first lady to advance causes she found significant. She fought for New Deal proposals, civil rights, and the rights of women. She believed education and equal opportunities should be guaranteed for all. After her husband died, Eleanor Roosevelt was on the board of directors for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). She was a leader in the formation of the United Nations at the end of World War II. She helped draft the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" and was the first chairman of the UN Human Rights Commission.

She was FDR's 5th cousin.

Why did he marry her?  Money?  Her family was very wealthy.

He meanwhile had mistresses during the marriage.

An early pic of her where she looks better and less "mannish".

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Eleanor_Roosevelt_in_school_portrait_-_NARA_-_197245.jpg/220px-Eleanor_Roosevelt_in_school_portrait_-_NARA_-_197245.jpg)

Wedding pic.

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b5/Eleanor_Roosevelt_wearing_her_wedding_dress_in_New_York_City_-_NARA_-_195393.jpg/220px-Eleanor_Roosevelt_wearing_her_wedding_dress_in_New_York_City_-_NARA_-_195393.jpg)

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tonymctones on April 28, 2020, 06:23:31 AM
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/tara-reade-neighbor-joe-biden-sexual-assault-201409554.html

The link is for yahoo but the article is from huffington post, it seems like this story is starting to gain more credibility. I hadnt read a lot about it but there seems to be more corraboration of this story than kavanaughs allegations.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on April 28, 2020, 11:51:23 AM
She was FDR's 5th cousin.

Why did he marry her?  Money?  Her family was very wealthy.

He meanwhile had mistresses during the marriage.

An early pic of her where she looks better and less "mannish".

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Eleanor_Roosevelt_in_school_portrait_-_NARA_-_197245.jpg/220px-Eleanor_Roosevelt_in_school_portrait_-_NARA_-_197245.jpg)

Wedding pic.

(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b5/Eleanor_Roosevelt_wearing_her_wedding_dress_in_New_York_City_-_NARA_-_195393.jpg/220px-Eleanor_Roosevelt_wearing_her_wedding_dress_in_New_York_City_-_NARA_-_195393.jpg)

These are really interesting details about the possible circumstances surrounding her marriage to FDR. Not sure what any of this has to do with her intellect and influence.

As most people age, especially women, the softness in their features becomes less so. I've read that it has something to do with the loss of "baby fat".  Here's another photo of her in her middle age where she isn't quite as unattractive or mannish looking.

(https://fthmb.tqn.com/lwx3w1G3xymxe_0e0d0yPPy6R4A=/768x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/eleanorroosevelt-56a48c275f9b58b7d0d780bd.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on April 29, 2020, 09:10:47 PM
Wasn't there is a website someone created once called "Is Dick Cheney Dead Yet"?  I thought either I someone posted it on the board?  Maybe someone should start one about Biden?   lol
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on April 30, 2020, 03:28:03 PM
Did creepy Joe Biden rape anyone today?

It’s still early on the west coast, so give the old pervert rapist a chance.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on May 01, 2020, 08:38:40 AM
Biden can't even make it through a damn scripted interview on MSNBC.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Soul Crusher on May 01, 2020, 09:02:46 AM
#MeToo Founder: Supporting Biden, Despite His Assault, is a "Pragmatic" Decision
FrontPage Magazine ^ | Apr 30, 2020 | Daniel Greenfield
Posted on 5/1/2020, 11:19:35 AM by SJackson

I'm impressed with Alyssa Milano. This is the kind of convoluted series of rationalizations you would expect from a career Washington Post columnist, not a former sitcom actress who became famous for tweeting a hashtag.

The fallacies are obvious.

In defending her support for Biden, she keeps using women as a collective group. As if she and her decisions represent all women. There are the strawmen and the false choices, accompanied by a distortion of history.

As an activist, it can be very easy to develop a black and white view of the world: things are clearly wrong or clearly right. Harvey Weinstein’s decades of rape were clearly wrong. Donald Trump’s alleged sexual assaults were clearly wrong. Brett Kavanaugh’s actions... were clearly wrong... Except it’s not always so easy, and living in the gray areas is something we’re trying to figure out in the world of social media. But here’s something social media doesn’t afford us–nuance... The world is gray. And as uncomfortable as that makes people, gray is where the real change happens.

Clearly.

Grown ups, you see, understand that you have to have gray areas because you're trying to make change happen and elect Democrats..

Now we pivot to "I'm a victim because I'm not allowed to live in the gray and shrug at sexual assaults to elect Democrats"

Women are not afforded the gray. We are not allowed anything but the binary extremes. And then, we are pressured to turn on one another for making impossible choices. It’s bullshit.

It’s not up to women to admonish or absolve perpetrators, or be regarded as complicit when we don’t denounce them. Nothing makes this clearer than the women who are still supporting Joe Biden even with these accusations. Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Stacey Abrams, Amy Klobuchar, Nancy Pelosi, and Elizabeth Warren have all endorsed Biden and like me, continue to support him. Because it’s an impossible choice.

It falls upon women to navigate within the system of men’s design to make pragmatic choices that we hope will lead us to a more equal future.  I still support Joe Biden because I believe that’s the best choice for that future, and again it is not up to women to absolve perpetrators.

Milano would like the moral authority to condemn men, but rejects that this morality authority comes with any expectation of consistency. She wants to inhabit the gray where she's not expected to maintain any standards and can selectively weaponize the following she built up to go after Trump or Kavanaugh.

That's the same old political cynicism dressed up in victimhood.

And so we're right back to, it's okay if Bill Clinton raped women, as long as he defends abortion. That's not advocacy for women.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on May 01, 2020, 06:31:20 PM
Did Gloria Allred take on the Tara Reade sexual assault case for free yet?

The Bob Mueller fuck ups make the bleach bit violations of federal law look like mole hills.

Time for a Trump re-election and liberal housecleaning in 2020.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: B_B_C on May 09, 2020, 12:28:48 PM
(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/85ed11c999962781390a0bc8b21759d5c6feb9e0/0_0_3488_2094/master/3488.jpg?width=700&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=04fa88a4cc0e638c911afa978554a7e1)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: AbrahamG on May 11, 2020, 07:14:33 PM
(https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/85ed11c999962781390a0bc8b21759d5c6feb9e0/0_0_3488_2094/master/3488.jpg?width=700&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=04fa88a4cc0e638c911afa978554a7e1)

I'd allow her to feverishly suck my cock.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on May 11, 2020, 07:57:23 PM
I'd allow her to feverishly suck my cock.

I get it that you're not terribly picky when it comes to women.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: AbrahamG on May 11, 2020, 08:12:41 PM
I get it that you're not terribly picky when it comes to women.

Since I'm only drawing from the female pool, I can't afford to be as picky as some people.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on May 11, 2020, 10:33:15 PM
Did Gloria Allred take on the Tara Reade sexual assault case for free yet?

The Bob Mueller fuck ups make the bleach bit violations of federal law look like mole hills.

Time for a Trump re-election and liberal housecleaning in 2020.

Right?  Where is the most irritating woman in America and why has she not had a press conference with this woman? 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on May 14, 2020, 10:09:21 AM
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/13/politics/cnn-poll-2020/index.html

Biden leads nationally but trump leads by 7 points in battleground states in a CNN poll.

This is with Biden doing the best he is going to do campaigning by staying out of sight and giving softball interviews, coronavirus and the economy in the toilet.

I am no trump fan, i voted for Johnson, i agree with a lot of the issues trump highlights but disagree with how he handles them. I feel this might be about as good as it gets for Biden. The more he is in the media the more he will say stupid shit and unless we get a huge second wave of corona and its mortality rate goes up we may have seeing the worst of it especially from an economic stand point.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on May 14, 2020, 10:13:13 AM
Poll finds Trump ahead of Biden in 15 battleground states
BY ZACK BUDRYK - 05/13/20
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign-polls/497677-trump-leads-biden-in-15-battleground-states-while-bidens-lead-shrinks
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on May 14, 2020, 01:23:34 PM
Since I'm only drawing from the female pool, I can't afford to be as picky as some people.

Good point....you're loss.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Yamcha on May 15, 2020, 03:56:06 AM
https://twitter.com/GPIngersoll/status/1261130477160800260 (https://twitter.com/GPIngersoll/status/1261130477160800260)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: funk51 on May 15, 2020, 05:13:08 AM
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Coach is Back! on May 15, 2020, 01:34:32 PM
https://vm.tiktok.com/TYLF3g/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: polychronopolous on May 17, 2020, 09:50:46 AM

Biden Says Voters Who Believe Tara Reade 'Probably Shouldn't Vote For Me'


(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/05/15/ap_20124502837956-83cc8695a50ad9497a1d913151f65ccbdac33fda-s800-c85.jpg)

Former Vice President Joe Biden again denied the sexual assault allegation made against him by former Senate staffer Tara Reade in an interview on MSNBC Thursday night, but added that voters who stand by Reade should not support him.

"If they believe Tara Reade, they probably shouldn't vote for me," Biden said when asked what message he would give to female voters who accept Reade's allegation as true, but were planning on supporting him.

"I wouldn't vote for me if I believed Tara Reade," Biden added.

Reade alleges that Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993 while she was working in his Senate office. She came forward publicly with the allegation in March. The former Senate staffer said last year that Biden had made her physically uncomfortable while she was working for him, but she did not make an assault accusation at that time.

In the Thursday interview, Biden added that he does not remember Reade and further disputed her allegation, citing that her claims have shifted over the past year.

https://www.npr.org/2020/05/15/856708004/biden-says-voters-who-believe-tara-reade-probably-shouldn-t-vote-for-me
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on May 17, 2020, 02:29:02 PM
Right?  Where is the most irritating woman in America and why has she not had a press conference with this woman?

why would she bother
the woman has changed her story multiple times and has publicly professed her adoration for Putin

She has zero credibility which of course would make her an ideal candidate for a cabinet position in the Trumptard administration

BTW - why does any Trumptard think this is some kind of issue
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on May 19, 2020, 09:50:07 AM
Phone call between Biden and Ukraine quid pro quo leaked.  :o


HE. IS. DONE. KAPUT. FINI.


"Four weeks later on March 22, 2016, Biden says "Tell me that there is a new government and a new Prosecutor General. I am prepared to do a public signing of the commitment for the billion dollars."

Poroshenko tells Biden that one of the leading candidates is the man who replaced Shokin, Yuriy Lutsenko who later said in a deposition that Hunter Biden and his business partners were receiving millions of dollars in compensation from Burisma.

Then, on May 13, 2016, Biden congratulates Poroshenko on "getting the new Prosecutor General," saying that it will be "critical for him to work quickly to repair the damage Shokin did."

"And I'm a man of my word," Biden adds. "And now that the new Prosecutor General is in place, we're ready to move forward to signing that one billion dollar loan guarantee."

Poroshenko thanks Biden for the support, and says that it was a "very tough challenge and a very difficult job."




https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/phone-calls-between-quid-pro-joe-biden-and-ukraines-poroshenko-leak-explicitly-details
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on May 19, 2020, 07:19:41 PM
does Donny tell too many lies and is Biddy clueless?

or is it the other way around

Here's another thing to ponder. Are we all screwed no matter which politician we support?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Coach is Back! on May 19, 2020, 09:26:43 PM
why would she bother
the woman has changed her story multiple times and has publicly professed her adoration for Putin

She has zero credibility which of course would make her an ideal candidate for a cabinet position in the Trumptard administration

BTW - why does any Trumptard think this is some kind of issue

That’s pretty funny since you thought Balsy-Ford and Kavanaughs alleged accusers had credibility
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on May 20, 2020, 10:48:36 AM
If we, the electorate, were as honest as the standing candidates we might elect better  politicians



Unreal level self hate in this post.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tom joad on May 20, 2020, 11:22:35 AM
Two-and-a-half months later and Trump is still lamenting over Super Tuesday and tweeting about Crazy Bernie, Pochahontas & Alfred E Newman . . . shit, how afraid is he of Sleepy Joe?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: JustPlaneJane on May 20, 2020, 11:23:05 AM
If we, the electorate, were as honest as the standing candidates we might elect better  politicians

Go fuck yourself.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on May 20, 2020, 01:40:39 PM
Two-and-a-half months later and Trump is still lamenting over Super Tuesday and tweeting about Crazy Bernie, Pochahontas & Alfred E Newman . . . shit, how afraid is he of Sleepy Joe?


Yawn...not very.

Biden is getting plenty on his own.


 :D

"In Kiev late last month, District Court Judge S. V. Vovk ordered the country’s law enforcement services to formally list the fired prosecutor, Victor Shokin, as the victim of an alleged crime by the former U.S. vice president, according to an official English translation of the ruling obtained by Just the News.

The court had previously ordered the Prosecutor General’s Office and the State Bureau of Investigations in February to investigate Shokin’s claim that he was fired in spring 2016 under pressure from Biden because he was investigating Burisma Holdings, the natural gas company where Biden’s son Hunter worked."


https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/ukraine-judge-orders-joe-biden-be-listed-alleged
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on June 09, 2020, 05:41:53 PM
Gallup Ratings Show Trump In Position To Win Despite The Covid-19 Crisis
Simon Constable
May 22, 2020
https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonconstable/2020/05/22/despite-the-covid-19-economic-fallout-trumps-approval-ratings-remain-high/?fbclid=IwAR0AkEITlj2pWX2X9cyVVVADlY4yx2FVzojLGgzbe6_qyfLPPJxRVI9X-rE#91a7577731a8
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 01, 2020, 02:05:24 PM
Biden apparently has a big lead in the polls.  People already predicting a landslide win for Biden.  Sounds an awful lot like 2016. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on July 01, 2020, 02:11:13 PM
If we, the electorate, were as honest as the standing candidates we might elect better  politicians

You must be joking!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on July 01, 2020, 02:14:52 PM
Biden apparently has a big lead in the polls.  People already predicting a landslide win for Biden.  Sounds an awful lot like 2016.

I agree. With any luck, the results won't mirror the 2016 election. Perhaps the candidate with the majority vote will actually win the election.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on July 01, 2020, 02:30:58 PM
I agree. With any luck, the results won't mirror the 2016 election. Perhaps the candidate with the majority vote will actually win the election.

Majority vote isn't the rules.

If it were, media campaigning, spends, strategies, etc would all be changed.

Therefore, the 2016 result could have been the same.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on July 01, 2020, 08:35:15 PM
Majority vote isn't the rules.

If it were, media campaigning, spends, strategies, etc would all be changed.

Therefore, the 2016 result could have been the same.

Not sure what you are trying to say here. I know what the "rules" are assuming you are referring to the electoral college. I post nothing suggesting changing the rules. I simply said if the candidate with the majority vote wins as has happened in 53 of the 58 total elections held so far (about 91 percent), the winner of the national popular vote has also carried the Electoral College vote.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on July 01, 2020, 10:14:50 PM
Will Biden win? DEPENDS


(https://i.redd.it/1azkema7v7u41.png)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 01, 2020, 11:58:32 PM
I agree. With any luck, the results won't mirror the 2016 election. Perhaps the candidate with the majority vote will actually win the election.

If by luck you mean bad luck, then I agree we would be lucky to have a man that is clearly suffering from a severe mental decline be elected president. 

We don't have a "majority vote" election for president.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 01, 2020, 11:59:49 PM
Not sure what you are trying to say here. I know what the "rules" are assuming you are referring to the electoral college. I post nothing suggesting changing the rules. I simply said if the candidate with the majority vote wins as has happened in 53 of the 58 total elections held so far (about 91 percent), the winner of the national popular vote has also carried the Electoral College vote.

This is no "winner of the national popular vote," because there is no "national popular vote" contest.  If there was, the candidates would run much differently.  And presidential elections would be decided by about three or four states.   
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on July 02, 2020, 12:01:49 PM
This is no "winner of the national popular vote," because there is no "national popular vote" contest.  If there was, the candidates would run much differently.  And presidential elections would be decided by about three or four states.   

Right there is no national popular vote. Please excuse my dyslexia. I think you are smart enough to know what I meant. -Maybe not.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 02, 2020, 02:25:59 PM
Right there is no national popular vote. Please excuse my dyslexia. I think you are smart enough to know what I meant. -Maybe not.

I know exactly what you're trying to do.  You are trying to delegitimize the president's victory by claiming Hillary Clinton received more votes than Trump.  It's a weak and flawed position for the reasons I already stated.  And for context purposes, Clinton's ENTIRE popular vote spread came from California, where Trump didn't even campaign. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Skeletor on July 02, 2020, 03:19:45 PM
This is no "winner of the national popular vote," because there is no "national popular vote" contest.  If there was, the candidates would run much differently.  And presidential elections would be decided by about three or four states.   

Some of the most populous counties were won by Democrats but there are over 3000 counties total in the US.

However, Trump won 2626 counties vs Clinton's 489. Quite a difference.

Just Los Angeles County (the most populous county in the US) where  Democrats won by over 70% they had almost 1.7 million votes more.

In Cook County, Illinois, (the 2nd most populous county), again the Democrats won with over 70% and almost 1.1 million votes more.

Just these 2 counties alone (the most populous in the US) which are heavily Democrat (over 70%) account for 2.8 million votes which is approximately that "popular vote" difference Hillary supporters keep mentioning.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 02, 2020, 09:29:38 PM
Some of the most populous counties were won by Democrats but there are over 3000 counties total in the US.

However, Trump won 2626 counties vs Clinton's 489. Quite a difference.

Just Los Angeles County (the most populous county in the US) where  Democrats won by over 70% they had almost 1.7 million votes more.

In Cook County, Illinois, (the 2nd most populous county), again the Democrats won with over 70% and almost 1.1 million votes more.

Just these 2 counties alone (the most populous in the US) which are heavily Democrat (over 70%) account for 2.8 million votes which is approximately that "popular vote" difference Hillary supporters keep mentioning.

Great info.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on July 02, 2020, 10:53:40 PM
The Democrats have a big problem in the fact that they are not denouncing political agitators like Antifa/BLM, etc.

That gives the impression that they are aligned with lawlessness.

It's amazing that folks in Seattle, NY, and Oregon are experiencing massive chaos and destruction and still vote blue.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on July 02, 2020, 11:49:04 PM
Some of the most populous counties were won by Democrats but there are over 3000 counties total in the US.

However, Trump won 2626 counties vs Clinton's 489. Quite a difference.

Just Los Angeles County (the most populous county in the US) where  Democrats won by over 70% they had almost 1.7 million votes more.

In Cook County, Illinois, (the 2nd most populous county), again the Democrats won with over 70% and almost 1.1 million votes more.

Just these 2 counties alone (the most populous in the US) which are heavily Democrat (over 70%) account for 2.8 million votes which is approximately that "popular vote" difference Hillary supporters keep mentioning.

I think if you were to do a survey you'd find democrats gravitate to cities and republicans to rural areas. In states like Oregon, this is very much the case, which explains why it is so strongly democratic. There are three counties in the Portland Metro area. The two that have the largest rural areas are the more politically diverse with a mixture of democrats and republicans. Multnomah County is almost exclusively urban. Democratic candidates very consistently win the elections there.

For several years the state house representative in my district was a right wing republican. At election times her lawn signs (more like billboards) were all over the fences of the country estates. In the last election, her democratic opponent, a nurse, had the nurse's union behind her pouring lots of money into her campaign and she won. Organizations can dump a lot more money into a campaign than a few very wealthy people can.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on July 03, 2020, 07:35:58 PM


However, Trump won 2626 counties vs Clinton's 489. Quite a difference.



 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on July 07, 2020, 12:16:10 PM
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on July 07, 2020, 10:16:57 PM
I can't wait for the debate.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2020, 11:48:54 AM
I can't wait for the debate.


Assuming they actually have debates.  I'm not convinced Biden will participate.  They are laying the groundwork now.

Biden Should Not Debate Trump Unless …
Here are two conditions the Democrat should set.
By Thomas L. Friedman
Opinion Columnist
July 7, 2020
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/opinion/biden-trump-debate.html?smid=fb-share&fbclid=IwAR21Ru282_xej8uWQpMt4sHlsPu9yQqKHevW4Tp_eVxuvwqUxawJDLyUIfY
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Skeletor on July 09, 2020, 12:08:24 PM
Assuming they actually have debates.  I'm not convinced Biden will participate.  They are laying the groundwork now.

Biden Should Not Debate Trump Unless …
Here are two conditions the Democrat should set.
By Thomas L. Friedman
Opinion Columnist
July 7, 2020
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/opinion/biden-trump-debate.html?smid=fb-share&fbclid=IwAR21Ru282_xej8uWQpMt4sHlsPu9yQqKHevW4Tp_eVxuvwqUxawJDLyUIfY

LOL @ Friedman... Plus his "terms" are ridiculous. And the "fact checkers" we've seen in previous debates were ridiculous.

(https://pics.me.me/nbc-news-nbcnews-nbc-news-fact-check-trump-says-clinton-4653815.png)


Covid-19 did Biden's team a great favor as they have been keeping him in his basement so that he doesn't make too many embarrassing public appearances.

If the live debates do happen and the questions or topics are not given out beforehand, I think that bumbling old Biden will be humiliated. Trump will be his usual self, with all the crazy reactions, typical quotes and theatrics which, however, seem to have worked in his favor so far.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on July 09, 2020, 03:41:35 PM
Assuming they actually have debates.  I'm not convinced Biden will participate.  They are laying the groundwork now.

Normally I'd say "nah, there's no chance" but it is 2020 and stranger things have happened. ???

I think it's unlikely that Biden will back away, although, considering his inability to properly enunciate even simple words like "JOE" and "JILL" it might have been a good idea. Just claim that attendance would mean missing out on the early bird special or something.

I really do think they'll have the debates and that it'll end up being as cringeworthy as the Family Guy video above or maybe even like this:

.

I don't care if you're for Trump or Biden. They're both equally repulsive to me and I I think that it's a disgrace to have our leaders be septuagenarians:

Donald Trump: 74
Joe Biden: 77
Mitch McConnell: 78
Nancy Pelosi: 80
Chuck Schumer: 70.

The only one who's not in his 70s is Kevin McCarthy and at 55 he ain't no spring chicken either. Between the six of them, their average age is 72. Take McCarthy out and the average age is almost 76! Note that actuarial tables (https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html) peg the average life expectancy in the U.S. at 75 for a male and 80 for a female. So our leadership is comprised almost entirely of people that are, statistically speaking, dead.

These assholes all have at least one foot in the grave and may very well not live to see NYE 2021, but they are the people we have making decisions for the rest of us. They're the people still wanting to run to keep their position of power. Tell me, what the fuck is that?!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2020, 05:18:35 PM
LOL @ Friedman... Plus his "terms" are ridiculous. And the "fact checkers" we've seen in previous debates were ridiculous.

(https://pics.me.me/nbc-news-nbcnews-nbc-news-fact-check-trump-says-clinton-4653815.png)


Covid-19 did Biden's team a great favor as they have been keeping him in his basement so that he doesn't make too many embarrassing public appearances.

If the live debates do happen and the questions or topics are not given out beforehand, I think that bumbling old Biden will be humiliated. Trump will be his usual self, with all the crazy reactions, typical quotes and theatrics which, however, seem to have worked in his favor so far.

In addition to the poll numbers purportedly showing Biden leading, this is exactly why I don't think Biden will participate in the debates.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2020, 05:21:32 PM
Normally I'd say "nah, there's no chance" but it is 2020 and stranger things have happened. ???

I think it's unlikely that Biden will back away, although, considering his inability to properly enunciate even simple words like "JOE" and "JILL" it might have been a good idea. Just claim that attendance would mean missing out on the early bird special or something.

I really do think they'll have the debates and that it'll end up being as cringeworthy as the Family Guy video above or maybe even like this:

.

I don't care if you're for Trump or Biden. They're both equally repulsive to me and I I think that it's a disgrace to have our leaders be septuagenarians:

Donald Trump: 74
Joe Biden: 77
Mitch McConnell: 78
Nancy Pelosi: 80
Chuck Schumer: 70.

The only one who's not in his 70s is Kevin McCarthy and at 55 he ain't no spring chicken either. Between the six of them, their average age is 72. Take McCarthy out and the average age is almost 76! Note that actuarial tables (https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html) peg the average life expectancy in the U.S. at 75 for a male and 80 for a female. So our leadership is comprised almost entirely of people that are, statistically speaking, dead.

These assholes all have at least one foot in the grave and may very well not live to see NYE 2021, but they are the people we have making decisions for the rest of us. They're the people still wanting to run to keep their position of power. Tell me, what the fuck is that?!

Their ages don't really matter to me.  It's whether they are mentally and physically strong and healthy enough to do the job.  Some 70 year olds are confined to a nursing home and can barely function.  Some still lift.  Some run marathons.  It really depends.   

But regarding strange things happening, like I just told one of my friends, I cannot argue with logic, but I will say I have seen a lot of illogical things the past six months. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on July 09, 2020, 08:11:37 PM
Their ages don't really matter to me.  It's whether they are mentally and physically strong and healthy enough to do the job.  Some 70 year olds are confined to a nursing home and can barely function.  Some still lift.  Some run marathons.  It really depends.   

Sure there are exceptions, but we really shouldn't be having 70-year olds running the show. Forget the cognitive decline that even the best preserved septuagenarian has. It's simply an issue of having someone who's statistically basically dead making decisions that might affect the rest of us for decades.


But regarding strange things happening, like I just told one of my friends, I cannot argue with logic, but I will say I have seen a lot of illogical things the past six months.

I never thought I'd say this but maybe the end is near!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 09, 2020, 08:32:22 PM
Sure there are exceptions, but we really shouldn't be having 70-year olds running the show. Forget the cognitive decline that even the best preserved septuagenarian has. It's simply an issue of having someone who's statistically basically dead making decisions that might affect the rest of us for decades.


I never thought I'd say this but maybe the end is near!

I don't agree with the rigid 70 year old limit.  There are not exceptions, there are just a wide variety of abilities at that age.  Plus there is no substitute for life experience.  Older people have it and those who have taken care of and developed their minds and bodies are a treasure.   

I have actually said I'm about ready to go stand on the corner wearing one of those The End is Near signs.  lol 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Skeletor on July 09, 2020, 08:38:35 PM
I think there should be an age limit but first of all there should be term limits.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on July 09, 2020, 10:59:23 PM
I have actually said I'm about ready to go stand on the corner wearing one of those The End is Near signs.  lol

That you and I agree on something is definitely scary  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 10, 2020, 11:14:16 AM
I think there should be an age limit but first of all there should be term limits.

Definitely agree about term limits.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 10, 2020, 11:14:45 AM
That you and I agree on something is definitely scary  ;D

Bruh we probably agree on more than you might think.   :)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on July 10, 2020, 01:19:19 PM
Trump has 91% chance of re-election, according to model that got 25 of the last 27 elections right
The political science professor predicts Trump will have an even larger win in 2020 than his 2016 victory
July 9, 2020
https://www.theblaze.com/news/trump-win-2020-election-prediction-model
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on July 18, 2020, 06:12:20 PM
Joe Biden: Dumb, plagiarist, lying SOB

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tom joad on July 25, 2020, 11:19:07 AM
100 days to Trump's re-election landslide!!!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on July 26, 2020, 07:08:35 PM
(https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/5f1877d2f052016872aefe01/master/pass/donald-and-melania-trump-masks.jpg)

(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/HQq5fRdpGwUw1V4oyGl8zw--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTQ3MC43MDU-/https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/vlpooKnl8oPAKcpczQYvrw--~B/aD0yMDAzO3c9MzAwMDtzbT0xO2FwcGlkPXl0YWNoeW9u/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_new_york_times_articles_158/161ca27080d98b6aba28caf7adcf43c1)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 03, 2020, 04:51:40 PM
Op ed number two telling Biden not to debate Trump.  I'm predicting, again, that we will not see three debates and likely will not see any.

Joe Biden should not debate President Trump, Clinton’s ex-WH spokesman says
The former spokesman points to Biden's large lead in many polls
By Edmund DeMarche | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-should-not-debate-president-trump-clintons-ex-wh-spokesman-says?fbclid=IwAR1dH0fiTI-eBNxF-Nt1cjPoMLYFJWhCJiAmHP2WHYsTgWC85izmK4dbiPQ
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 11, 2020, 03:57:58 PM
Funniest comment I saw after Biden announced Kamala Harris as his VP choice:  "heels up." 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on August 11, 2020, 04:58:05 PM
LMAO
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 11, 2020, 05:07:12 PM
Awkward.

Kamala Harris On Joe Biden Accusers: ‘I Believe Them’
The presidential hopeful weighed in on the recent allegations of inappropriate touching against the former vice president.
headshot
By Alanna Vagianos
POLITICS 04/03/2019 03:24 pm ET Updated Apr 04, 2019

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kamala-harris-joe-biden-accusers-i-believe-them_n_5ca4fb96e4b094d3f5c5750f?fbclid=IwAR3gi7iRq5bSBm0_qVry0GJtj_MXeshmtLgjtknfKi2zPhNC-Nr3HiFefu8
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Irongrip400 on August 11, 2020, 05:08:06 PM
Awkward.

Kamala Harris On Joe Biden Accusers: ‘I Believe Them’
The presidential hopeful weighed in on the recent allegations of inappropriate touching against the former vice president.
headshot
By Alanna Vagianos
POLITICS 04/03/2019 03:24 pm ET Updated Apr 04, 2019

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kamala-harris-joe-biden-accusers-i-believe-them_n_5ca4fb96e4b094d3f5c5750f?fbclid=IwAR3gi7iRq5bSBm0_qVry0GJtj_MXeshmtLgjtknfKi2zPhNC-Nr3HiFefu8

If he wins, she’ll force him into retirement.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on August 12, 2020, 12:11:38 PM
Awkward.

Why? Does anyone NOT believe that Biden touches people inappropriately? It seems like standard operating procedure for old dottering creepers from whatever century he's from. He sniffs people's hair on camera but the "scandal" is that CopLover Harris believes the accusers? ???


Kamala Harris On Joe Biden Accusers: ‘I Believe Them’
The presidential hopeful weighed in on the recent allegations of inappropriate touching against the former vice president.
headshot
By Alanna Vagianos
POLITICS 04/03/2019 03:24 pm ET Updated Apr 04, 2019

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kamala-harris-joe-biden-accusers-i-believe-them_n_5ca4fb96e4b094d3f5c5750f?fbclid=IwAR3gi7iRq5bSBm0_qVry0GJtj_MXeshmtLgjtknfKi2zPhNC-Nr3HiFefu8
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 12, 2020, 05:35:34 PM
Why? Does anyone NOT believe that Biden touches people inappropriately? It seems like standard operating procedure for old dottering creepers from whatever century he's from. He sniffs people's hair on camera but the "scandal" is that CopLover Harris believes the accusers? ???

Chuck Schumer:  “Now I’ve heard Joe Biden’s explanation. I think it’s sufficient,” Schumer continued. “I think he will be a great candidate. I think he will be a great president. And I think he will help us take back the Senate.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/12/chuck-schumer-joe-biden-tara-reade-allegation-251939

Don't you think she should explain how she is serving as the running mate for someone she believes is a serial sexual harasser/abuser of women?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on August 12, 2020, 07:52:17 PM
Chuck Schumer:  “Now I’ve heard Joe Biden’s explanation. I think it’s sufficient,” Schumer continued. “I think he will be a great candidate. I think he will be a great president. And I think he will help us take back the Senate.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/12/chuck-schumer-joe-biden-tara-reade-allegation-251939

Don't you think she should explain how she is serving as the running mate for someone she believes is a serial sexual harasser/abuser of women?

I think it's obvious how: she's got no principles, is thirty for power and suffers from the same delusion that anyone running for the office of the President suffers from: terminal narcissism.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 14, 2020, 08:44:20 PM
I think it's obvious how: she's got no principles, is thirty for power and suffers from the same delusion that anyone running for the office of the President suffers from: terminal narcissism.

I agree she has no principles.  Been talking to some Democrats about how Harris lacks authenticity.  I think that's why she only got 844 votes in cacuses/primaries.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 14, 2020, 08:46:43 PM
I hate "anonymous" sources, but if true, doesn't bode well for Biden.

Tensions linger between Biden and Obama camps throughout 2020 primary campaign: report
“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f--k things up,” one Democrat who spoke to the former president recalled him saying
By Morgan Phillips | Fox News

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com.

Despite the best-friend bond Joe Biden touts with former President Obama, tensions have lingered between the two statesmen over their vastly different governing styles, according to a Politico report.

To start, a number of anonymously sourced quotes from Obama leaked out throughout the 2020 Biden campaign where the former president allegedly expressed doubts about his former running mates’ fitness for office.

“Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f--k things up,” one Democrat who spoke to the former president recalled him saying.

When lamenting his own diminishing relationship with the current Democratic electorate, particularly in Iowa, Obama reportedly told one 2020 candidate: “And you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden.”

Some Biden aides pointed out that, when Obama’s endorsement of Biden in 2020 finally did arrive, it didn’t have nearly the energy of his endorsement of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

“I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office,” Obama said of Clinton in 2016 in an endorsement video. “I believe Joe has all of the qualities we need in a president right now … and I know he will surround himself with good people,” Obama said in Biden’s endorsement video.

HILLARY CLINTON SUGGESTS SHE'S WILLING TO SERVE IN BIDEN ADMINISTRATION

And while some senior Democrats credited Biden’s ties to Obama for his strong relationship with Black voters, Biden has emphasized that he earned their votes all on his own. He told aides after his South Carolina primary win Obama hadn’t “lifted a finger” to help him.

Going back to 2016 when Obama glossed over Biden for Clinton when he expressed interest in a presidential run, Obama aides tried to frame the president’s snub as an act of compassion: Biden-- grieving the loss of his son Beau in 2015 -- would not be mentally equipped to handle a campaign.

“But numerous administration veterans, including loyalists to both Obama and Biden, remember it differently: Obama had begun embracing Clinton as a possible successor years before Biden lost his son, while the vice president was laying the groundwork for his own campaign,” the Politico report read.

Obama “had been subtly weighing in against,” Biden himself recalled in Promise Me, Dad, his 2017 book.

“I also believe he had concluded that Hillary Clinton was almost certain to be the nominee, which was good by him,” Biden wrote.

BIDEN, OBAMA TARGET TRUMP IN SIT-DOWN

But many credit their differences in leadership style for any perceived tension. Biden loyalists and some Republicans found the formal, scholarly statesman Obama  had a hard time connecting with those in Congress.

“Negotiating with President Obama was all about the fact that he felt that he knew the world better than you,” said Eric Cantor, the Republican House majority leader from 2011 to 2014. “And he felt that he thought about it so much, that he figured it all out, and no matter what conclusion you had come to with the same set of facts, his way was right.” Biden, he said, understood that “you’re gonna have to agree to disagree about some things.”

A former Republican leadership described Obama’s style as “mansplaining, basically.”

Meanwhile, Obama’s camp reportedly rolled their eyes at the plainspoken, gaffe-prone Biden.

“You could certainly see technocratic eye-rolling at times,” said Jen Psaki, the former White House communications director.

White House aides reportedly mocked Biden’s frequent slipups and lack of discipline next to “almost clerical” Obama.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

They would sneer at how Biden, “like an elderly uncle at Thanksgiving,” would launch into anecdotes everyone in the room had heard before.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-obama-tensions-2020-primary
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on August 14, 2020, 09:32:39 PM
I agree she has no principles.  Been talking to some Democrats about how Harris lacks authenticity.  I think that's why she only got 844 votes in cacuses/primaries.


Wait what? She only got a total of 844 votes? What the hell?! The “Rent is too damn high” guy got more!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 14, 2020, 10:13:45 PM
If the Democrats believed the polls they wouldn't be scrambling to paint Kamala Harris as a moderate.

She's not even a viable candidate for a small town city council
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 15, 2020, 12:23:13 AM
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   FOX News   Biden 49, Trump 42   Biden +7
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on August 18, 2020, 09:53:17 PM
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   FOX News   Biden 49, Trump 42   Biden +7

4 years ago that would have meant something. Trump is an anomaly.  Polls are worthless with him.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 19, 2020, 05:39:26 AM
Watching Clinton last night, I thought he was in his 80s. I looked him up and he’s only 74. Same with Biden. These Dem pols don’t age well.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 21, 2020, 08:17:53 PM
Did Biden get a post-convention bump in the polls? 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on August 22, 2020, 08:22:45 AM
4 years ago that would have meant something. Trump is an anomaly.  Polls are worthless with him.
They were worthless 4 years ago too.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Gregzs on August 23, 2020, 12:49:44 PM
 :o

Trump's sister criticizes her brother in secretly recorded audio

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tom joad on August 23, 2020, 01:50:28 PM
:o

Trump's sister criticizes her brother in secretly recorded audio



the base doesn't care because Donald was sent by God as the chosen one.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on August 23, 2020, 03:09:07 PM
If the Democrats believed the polls they wouldn't be scrambling to paint Kamala Harris as a moderate.

She's not even a viable candidate for a small town city council

I guess all those years as a prosecutor, DA and AG of Cal or being a US senator ,don't count?

Disagree with her on policy and claim she's too liberal, etc. That's a legit debate and traditional part of political debate.
But trying to attack her on lack of experience or qualifications, won't gain traction outside of Trump world.

It's like  saying ARNOLD's biceps are too small to be Mr Olympia  :o

C'mon Walt, saying Kamala lacks the background for office is like dems saying VP Pence doesn't know the bible.

FYI, even after the corona debacle , Trump still has the edge on Biden on handling the economy.
If team Trump kept the focus on the economy and conservative social issues ( like pro life) he might be able to close the poll gap.

I'll watch the GOP convention with an objective attitude, so we'll see if they promote a more inclusive, optimistic agenda.
Trump won't win as the incumbant by saying things suck now, *UNDER HIS WATCH.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 23, 2020, 04:52:39 PM
Harris only got the nod because she was the best of a horrible bunch as a result of Biden boxing himself in by limiting his choices to dark skinned women.  Harris has some name value, and is somewhat telegenic. However, she was miserable failure as a candidate, having the worst performance of any of those in the Democratic primary. No reason to think anybody’s gonna find her more attractive in the general election. Moreover, she might have the worst speaking voice in the history of politics, the annoying whine is simply unlistenable.

In 2016, I predicted HERE that Trump would get 310 electoral votes. He got 306. This time around with the benefit of party support, superior funding, an inferior opponent, and the advantage of being the incumbent, I predict 330.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tom joad on August 23, 2020, 07:12:53 PM
Harris only got the nod because she was the best of a horrible bunch as a result of Biden boxing himself in by limiting his choices to dark skinned women.  Harris has some name value, and is somewhat telegenic. However, she was miserable failure as a candidate, having the worst performance of any of those in the Democratic primary. No reason to think anybody’s gonna find her more attractive in the general election. Moreover, she might have the worst speaking voice in the history of politics, the annoying whine is simply unlistenable.

In 2016, I predicted HERE that Trump would get 310 electoral votes. He got 306. This time around with the benefit of party support, superior funding, an inferior opponent, and the advantage of being the incumbent, I predict 330.

Bold prediction.  How do you envision Trump gaining 24 electoral votes?  Assuming you're giving Trump all of the states that he won before and (say) he picks up MN (10) ... where are you optimistic about finding 14 more electoral votes?  VA (13) + ME (1)? or CO (9) + NM (5)? or Trump loses MN but wins VA (13) + NV (6) + NM (5)? 

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on August 23, 2020, 08:28:12 PM
There is a hush over normal working/tax paying people...just in waiting ready to vote away the anti-American left. Landslide.

People aren't buying what the free shit army is selling, they are smarter than that. Seriously, look at your geriatric wet noodle candidate who stands only for what enriched him or kept him in power - worst and weakest POTUS candidate in modern times.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 24, 2020, 02:04:04 AM
Bold prediction.  How do you envision Trump gaining 24 electoral votes?  Assuming you're giving Trump all of the states that he won before and (say) he picks up MN (10) ... where are you optimistic about finding 14 more electoral votes?  VA (13) + ME (1)? or CO (9) + NM (5)? or Trump loses MN but wins VA (13) + NV (6) + NM (5)?

Good post. I just don’t see Biden, playing prevent defense, turning any state Hillary lost in 2016. Here’s where I see Trump gaining. I would add Maine and New Mexico as possibilities and maybe Virginia, although that state has a lot of government workers who reflexively vote Dem. I would throw in NY & NJ as longshots but not impossible:



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 24, 2020, 10:22:24 AM
I think I posted this already, but cannot recall if it was in this thread.

Political scientist predicts 'landslide' win for President Trump in 2020 election
by CBS Austin StaffMonday, August 24th 2020
https://kmph.com/news/nation-world/political-scientist-predicts-landslide-win-for-president-trump-in-2020-election?fbclid=IwAR2SJxDJPORf1aTMeXJHrGjUHKRrlyJD-wgPNXDXy1VaTpFBupRydgHFKB8
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on August 24, 2020, 10:45:42 AM
I think I posted this already, but cannot recall if it was in this thread.

Political scientist predicts 'landslide' win for President Trump in 2020 election
by CBS Austin StaffMonday, August 24th 2020
https://kmph.com/news/nation-world/political-scientist-predicts-landslide-win-for-president-trump-in-2020-election?fbclid=IwAR2SJxDJPORf1aTMeXJHrGjUHKRrlyJD-wgPNXDXy1VaTpFBupRydgHFKB8

LOL - THE TRAITOR didn't even get a "landslide" the first time

I wonder what THE TRAITOR thinks about "political science" ?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tom joad on August 24, 2020, 12:27:17 PM
71 days out from election day, this RCP map looks daunting for Trump.  Of the 211 electoral votes that they have as Toss-Ups, Biden is only defending 20 votes (in MN, NV & NH.). Whereas Trump won all of the others last time.

Of course plenty could change in this Covid election with the GOP convention just starting today, plus the debates to come, and probably a few October surprises.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on August 24, 2020, 01:48:23 PM
Texas becoming a toss up is the death knoll for team Trump.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 24, 2020, 02:00:11 PM
Texas becoming a toss up is the death knoll for team Trump.

LoL

Biden barely beat Bernie in Texas. That chart has Iowa as a tossup. Biden came in fourth there in the caucus.

I believe debates are somewhat overrated. Where Trump is going to kick Biden’s ass is on the campaign trail. Biden is a senile old man and is not gonna be able to match Trump’s energy. Hanging out in his basement until November isn’t gonna cut it when Trump is continually on the road.

Remember, Trump was underfunded in 2016 and up against a smarter candidate yet he still won. This time around he’s got serious firepower and the bully pulpit off the Presidency.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on August 24, 2020, 03:21:17 PM
LoL

Biden barely beat Bernie in Texas. That chart has Iowa as a tossup. Biden came in fourth there in the caucus.

I believe debates are somewhat overrated. Where Trump is going to kick Biden’s ass is on the campaign trail. Biden is a senile old man and is not gonna be able to match Trump’s energy. Hanging out in his basement until November isn’t gonna cut it when Trump is continually on the road.

Remember, Trump was underfunded in 2016 and up against a smarter candidate yet he still won. This time around he’s got serious firepower and the bully pulpit off the Presidency.

Not sure what you're smoking but Trump is the SENILE OLD TRAITOR who needs someone hold his hand while he slow walks down a ramp

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on August 24, 2020, 03:25:58 PM
I guess all those years as a prosecutor, DA and AG of Cal or being a US senator ,don't count?

No, have you seen her work? Just cause she sucks a mean dick (allegedly) doesn't mean she'd make a good prosecutor, da, ag, senator or VP.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on August 24, 2020, 03:27:53 PM
No, have you seen her work? Just cause she sucks a mean dick (allegedly) doesn't mean she'd make a good prosecutor, da, ag, senator or VP.

who "alleged" that?

if you just made it up then tell us why you felt compelled to make that comment rather than discuss the issues or anything else about the candidate?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on August 24, 2020, 03:32:59 PM
who "alleged" that?

if you just made it up then tell us why you felt compelled to make that comment rather than discuss the issues or anything else about the candidate?
Willie Brown wrote it on the bathroom wall.
Would you care to discuss her flip flop support of a man she called a rapist and a racist a few months ago?
Try to answer without mentioning Trump. :D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 24, 2020, 04:03:32 PM
LoL

Biden barely beat Bernie in Texas. That chart has Iowa as a tossup. Biden came in fourth there in the caucus.

I believe debates are somewhat overrated. Where Trump is going to kick Biden’s ass is on the campaign trail. Biden is a senile old man and is not gonna be able to match Trump’s energy. Hanging out in his basement until November isn’t gonna cut it when Trump is continually on the road.

Remember, Trump was underfunded in 2016 and up against a smarter candidate yet he still won. This time around he’s got serious firepower and the bully pulpit off the Presidency.

I have been in California this past week and every liberal talk radio show was making excuses for why Hairplugs Biden is not going to go out on the campaign trail at all before the election.

One host said that Joe Biden would have had the greatest campaign in history, but President Trump purposely started COVID to keep Biden off the campaign trail.

Remember, this was a guy who lost caucuses to Mayor Pete Buttplug.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 24, 2020, 04:14:40 PM
I have been in California this past week and every liberal talk radio show was making excuses for why Hairplugs Biden is not going to go out on the campaign trail at all before the election.

One host said that Joe Biden would have had the greatest campaign in history, but President Trump purposely started COVID to keep Biden off the campaign trail.

Remember, this was a guy who lost caucuses to Mayor Pete Buttplug.

IMO, Primaries are a much better indicator of what’s going to happen than polls two and a half months out. The former shows what people actually did as opposed to what certain people say that they might do down the road.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 24, 2020, 04:17:13 PM
IMO, Primaries are a much better indicator of what’s going to happen than polls two and a half months out. The former shows what people actually did as opposed to what certain people say that they might do down the road.

Travel the country, get away from CA, NYC, and Chicago and you will see President Trump supporters outnumber Democrat supporters 2:1
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 24, 2020, 04:21:27 PM
Travel the country, get away from CA, NYC, and Chicago and you will see President Trump supporters outnumber Democrat supporters 2:1

Essentially the only people who really hate Trump are white liberals and the Mullahs in Iran.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 24, 2020, 04:38:58 PM
Essentially the only people who really hate Trump are white liberals and the Mullahs in Iran.

Generation Entitlement.

The kids who were in high school or college during the complete and total failure that was the Obama presidency (2008 - 2016) are the brain dead morons rioting in the streets to promote the left’s march toward communism.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 24, 2020, 04:39:15 PM
Travel the country, get away from CA, NYC, and Chicago and you will see President Trump supporters outnumber Democrat supporters 2:1

I've seen this in my travels too.  I don't know about 2 to 1, but I've encountered A LOT of Trump supporters around the country. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on August 24, 2020, 06:27:02 PM
Texas becoming a toss up is the death knoll for team Trump.
You believe this BS? They have been saying this for the past 12 years.  Look up Rick Perry.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on August 24, 2020, 06:51:06 PM
Willie Brown wrote it on the bathroom wall.
Would you care to discuss her flip flop support of a man she called a rapist and a racist a few months ago?
Try to answer without mentioning Trump. :D

As I figured, you just made it up

fucking loser

go ahead and post the quote of her calling Biden an "rapist" and "racist" (I assume you're referring to Biden)

I'll give you an example so you'll know exactly what I expect

Ted Cruz called Trump a "pathological liar" and said "he doesn't know the difference between truth and lies"
He said that Trump "lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth"
"whatever he does he accuses everyone else of doing"

You can find all those quotes and more in this videos

Now post the video of Harris calling Biden a "rapist" and a "racist"

I know you're a dunce which is why I provided you an explicit example so you'll understand exactly what I mean



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 24, 2020, 07:37:43 PM
Future President Donald Trump Jr., smacking the living shit out of liberals during his RNC speech.

The next four years look very bright with President Donald Trump leading the nation during his historic 2nd term.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on August 24, 2020, 08:02:32 PM
That Nikki Haley would be a great person to have on any ticket.  Brown women who is very qualified.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on August 24, 2020, 08:38:47 PM
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on August 24, 2020, 09:07:02 PM
As I figured, you just made it up

fucking loser

go ahead and post the quote of her calling Biden an "rapist" and "racist" (I assume you're referring to Biden)

I'll give you an example so you'll know exactly what I expect

Ted Cruz called Trump a "pathological liar" and said "he doesn't know the difference between truth and lies"
He said that Trump "lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth"
"whatever he does he accuses everyone else of doing"

You can find all those quotes and more in this videos

Now post the video of Harris calling Biden a "rapist" and a "racist"

I know you're a dunce which is why I provided you an explicit example so you'll understand exactly what I mean


As I figured, you couldn't answer without mentioning Trump. Seek help for your obsession.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 24, 2020, 11:11:41 PM
Kimberly Guilfoyle shouts through her forceful, intense convention address.

Intense? More like deranged. Honestly, Trump should promote her to be the spokeswoman of his re-election campaign quickly, before she's sent back to the nuthouse that she escaped from.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 24, 2020, 11:31:59 PM
2020 Joe Biden DNC acceptance speech = 21.8 million viewers

2016 Hillary Clinton DNC acceptance speech = 24.4 million viewers

2016 Donald Trump RNC acceptance speech = 34.9 million viewers

For 2020 President Donald Trump’s acceptance speech will end up with close to 40 million viewers

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO ABSOLUTELY CRUSH THE DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER!

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 25, 2020, 05:50:07 AM
Kimberly Guilfoyle shouts through her forceful, intense convention address.

Intense? More like deranged. Honestly, Trump should promote her to be the spokeswoman of his re-election campaign quickly, before she's sent back to the nuthouse that she escaped from.


This is your future old man. This and posting 20x a day on Getbig in your underwear. Remember, yellow in the front and brown in the back:



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on August 25, 2020, 06:12:42 AM
Kimberly Guilfoyle shouts through her forceful, intense convention address.

Intense? More like deranged. Honestly, Trump should promote her to be the spokeswoman of his re-election campaign quickly, before she's sent back to the nuthouse that she escaped from.


Yes, better to have folks like Donna Hylton who spoke at the DNC.
Quote
On March 20, 1985,[16] Donna Hylton and three female accomplices drugged and kidnapped 62-year-old Long Island real estate broker Thomas Vigliarolo at the behest of Louis Miranda, who thought Vigliarolo had cheated him out of $139,000 on a mutual con[4] in which the two allegedly sold shares in New York City condos and pocketed the money.[17] The kidnappers held Vigliarolo prisoner for 15–20 days. During that time, three men and four women, including Hylton, starved, burned, beat, sexually assaulted/raped, and tortured him.[4] On April 5, 1985, with Hylton asleep in the next room,[18] Vigliarolo died of asphyxiation. Three days later, his body was found locked in a trunk in a Manhattan apartment.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 25, 2020, 06:42:39 AM
Kimberly Guilfoyle shouts through her forceful, intense convention address.

Intense? More like deranged. Honestly, Trump should promote her to be the spokeswoman of his re-election campaign quickly, before she's sent back to the nuthouse that she escaped from.

Fuck off and die, you senile old perverted queer.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 25, 2020, 09:09:22 AM

Yes, better to have folks like Donna Hylton who spoke at the DNC.

Donna Hylton, served a 27 year sentence for a crime committed when she was 19 years old. Since her release over 8 years ago, she's advocated for the "humanitarian" release of aging prisoners. She's definitely got a complicated history. I don't know what prompted the DNC producers to include her. Her past is no secret. They must have had a good reason.

Did Donna come off sounding like she'd lost her marbles? I don't know, I didn't catch her appearance on the DNC. I did watch Kimberly Guilfoyle's speech. I am not the only person who questioned her sanity.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 25, 2020, 09:10:03 AM
Fuck off and die, you senile old perverted queer.

You are pathetic.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on August 25, 2020, 09:59:24 AM
Donna Hylton, served a 27 year sentence for a crime committed when she was 19 years old. Since her release over 8 years ago, she's advocated for the "humanitarian" release of aging prisoners. She's definitely got a complicated history. I don't know what prompted the DNC producers to include her. Her past is no secret. They must have had a good reason.

Did Donna come off sounding like she'd lost her marbles? I don't know, I didn't catch her appearance on the DNC. I did watch Kimberly Guilfoyle's speech. I am not the only person who questioned her sanity.

Her crime of murder, rape, and torture was without question.  She was convicted in a court of law.

The Democrats have no issue there with her speaking at their convention and representing their party.

But they DO have a problem when an alleged assault by 18 year old at a party, and the only evidence is a recovered memory.

Their hypocrisy is boundless.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on August 25, 2020, 05:39:50 PM
2020 Joe Biden DNC acceptance speech = 21.8 million viewers

2016 Hillary Clinton DNC acceptance speech = 24.4 million viewers

2016 Donald Trump RNC acceptance speech = 34.9 million viewers

For 2020 President Donald Trump’s acceptance speech will end up with close to 40 million viewers

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO ABSOLUTELY CRUSH THE DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER!

Not much of a post DNC bump for Biden/Harris.

I predict a significant bump for Trump/Pence after this week's RNC.  The MSM will ignore the polls or dismiss them as inaccurate.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 27, 2020, 12:51:49 AM
Looks like no post convention bounce for Biden.

Trump pops to 52%: ‘Best job approval rating on record,’ up with blacks, even Democrats
by Paul Bedard, Washington Secrets Columnist |   | August 26, 2020
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trump-pops-to-52-best-job-approval-rating-on-record-up-with-blacks-even-democrats
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 27, 2020, 06:32:18 AM
You are pathetic.

Fuck off and die, you senile old queer pedo.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 27, 2020, 11:59:29 AM
Her crime of murder, rape, and torture was without question.  She was convicted in a court of law.

The Democrats have no issue there with her speaking at their convention and representing their party.

But they DO have a problem when an alleged assault by 18 year old at a party, and the only evidence is a recovered memory.

Their hypocrisy is boundless.

This is another example of the hypocrisy of recognizing that a few people who have committed terrible crimes change and do good things with their lives.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 27, 2020, 12:01:36 PM
Fuck off and die, you senile old queer pedo.

You are pathetic.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 27, 2020, 12:18:09 PM
You are pathetic.

Fuck off and die a miserable death, you senile old sucker of cocks.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on August 27, 2020, 12:23:36 PM
Fuck off and die a miserable death, you senile old sucker of cocks.

You are pathetic.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 27, 2020, 12:44:13 PM
The Democrat Party (and Nancy Pelosi’s) advice to Joe Biden:

1) Don't debate.
2) Don't leave the basement.
3) Don't concede the election.

It sure seems like Hairplugs Biden needs a lot of advice from senile old hose hounds.

I’m not sure that advice indicates confidence in your candidate?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO ABSOLUTELY CRUSH THE DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 27, 2020, 12:45:14 PM
You are pathetic.

Go gargle semen until you drown, senile old toddler toucher.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on August 27, 2020, 01:09:58 PM
Nancy Pelosi Doesn't Think Joe Biden Should Debate Donald Trump

(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-X0fgWQcVOEA/WfPPqWYLtVI/AAAAAAAAPLk/KHoWjiyQQx8rwB9PCEID55hZouAsxqIngCLcBGAs/s1600/fri4436.jpg)

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/nancy-pelosi-donald-trump-joe-biden-debat-181815807.html
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on August 27, 2020, 01:11:51 PM
Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances'

(https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/03/13/03/4A23296900000578-0-image-a-2_1520912778722.jpg)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/hillary-clinton-says-biden-should-not-concede-2020-election-under-n1238156
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on August 27, 2020, 01:27:00 PM
Regardless of who wins , I'll accept the  result based on the final vote count for the electoral college.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 27, 2020, 02:42:16 PM
The Democrat Party (and Nancy Pelosi’s) advice to Joe Biden:

1) Don't debate.
2) Don't leave the basement.
3) Don't concede the election.

It sure seems like Hairplugs Biden needs a lot of advice from senile old hose hounds.

I’m not sure that advice indicates confidence in your candidate?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO ABSOLUTELY CRUSH THE DEMOCRATS IN NOVEMBER!

The campaign thing seems to think that Covid is a winning issue. I don’t see why. At this point everyone knows that it’s way over blown and they can’t even prove  that they would’ve done a better job.

Between Biden and Harris, they’ve never had a single original thought and it’s going to show in the next two months. Advisers can only get you so far. You actually have to be a good candidate and they both suck.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on August 27, 2020, 02:47:14 PM
Regardless of who wins , I'll accept the  result based on the final vote count for the electoral college.


You would be beaten with shoes for saying that in a room full of dems.  :D

So, win/win situation really.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on August 27, 2020, 03:43:37 PM

You would be beaten with shoes for saying that in a room full of dems.  :D

So, win/win situation really.

Sometimes ya gotta spit the truth and duck .


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on August 27, 2020, 03:56:39 PM
Nancy Pelosi Doesn't Think Joe Biden Should Debate Donald Trump

(https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-X0fgWQcVOEA/WfPPqWYLtVI/AAAAAAAAPLk/KHoWjiyQQx8rwB9PCEID55hZouAsxqIngCLcBGAs/s1600/fri4436.jpg)



Eating ice cream aged her badly  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 27, 2020, 04:08:04 PM
Eating ice cream aged her badly  ;D

She had probably just looked at the internal polls and saw that her candidate is falling apart.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 27, 2020, 04:12:37 PM
The campaign thing seems to think that Covid is a winning issue. I don’t see why. At this point everyone knows that it’s way over blown and they can’t even prove  that they would’ve done a better job.

Between Biden and Harris, they’ve never had a single original thought and it’s going to show in the next two months. Advisers can only get you so far. You actually have to be a good candidate and they both suck.

“CNN's Don Lemon is panicking over the disastrous impact that far-left riots are having on the Democrat Party.”

 - CNN

So the libidiots were all for looting and rioting when they thought it would hurt President Trump. Now their support of BLM goes away once it causes them votes. Does Don Lemon and the other liberal lemmings ever get tired of being wrong all the time?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on August 27, 2020, 04:22:14 PM
“CNN's Don Lemon is panicking over the disastrous impact that far-left riots are having on the Democrat Party.”

 - CNN

So the libidiots were all for looting and rioting when they thought it would hurt President Trump. Now their support of BLM goes away once it causes them votes. Does Don Lemon and the other liberal lemmings ever get tired of being wrong all the time?

Don Lemon is famous , successful and fit journalist who speaks to millions wearing designer suits
https://ans-wer.com/cnn-s-don-lemon-salary-update-april-2019-how-much-was-don-lemon-s-net-worth-and-salary-in-2018/

WalSobchak is a fat, piss-broke loser who bores people while posting  on getbig.com wearing skid-marked under-roos.
https://WaltSobchak-is-a-closet-case.com

Must suck to be you huh?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 27, 2020, 04:29:00 PM
“CNN's Don Lemon is panicking over the disastrous impact that far-left riots are having on the Democrat Party.”

 - CNN

So the libidiots were all for looting and rioting when they thought it would hurt President Trump. Now their support of BLM goes away once it causes them votes. Does Don Lemon and the other liberal lemmings ever get tired of being wrong all the time?

I don’t know what they were thinking. A lot of us here were saying three months ago that the riots are a big plus for the Republicans. Seems like the Democrats are always three months behind the times with Covid, and their stupid idea for a national mask
mandate, as well as the riots. That’s what happens when you have a campaign done by committee and a candidate who can’t  think on the fly.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on August 27, 2020, 05:59:34 PM
Don Lemon is famous , successful and fit journalist who speaks to millions wearing designer suits
https://ans-wer.com/cnn-s-don-lemon-salary-update-april-2019-how-much-was-don-lemon-s-net-worth-and-salary-in-2018/

WalSobchak is a fat, piss-broke loser who bores people while posting  on getbig.com wearing skid-marked under-roos.
https://WaltSobchak-is-a-closet-case.com

Must suck to be you huh?

You probably thought that was funny. You look up to a guy who gets jism pumped up his ass from strange men. Typical Tuesday night for you and PrimePedo isn’t it?

Your mommy obviously died from embarrassment.

Nothing stopping you from voting for Hillary again in November, Cuck.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 28, 2020, 12:42:07 PM

Wait what? She only got a total of 844 votes? What the hell?! The “Rent is too damn high” guy got more!

 ;D

I'm trying to think of a weaker more uninspiring duo than Biden/Harris on a major ticket, but cannot think of one.  Neither one of them is very smart.  Neither one can think on their feet.  Neither one has really accomplished much despite their combined decades of public service.  And most importantly, their ideas suck.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 28, 2020, 01:14:45 PM
;D

I'm trying to think of a weaker more uninspiring duo than Biden/Harris on a major ticket, but cannot think of one.  Neither one of them is very smart.  Neither one can think on their feet.  Neither one has really accomplished much despite their combined decades of public service.  And most importantly, their ideas suck.


This is becoming more apparent with each passing day. The campaign appears to be in disarray. They were up by a field goal in the second quarter of the game and thought that they could sit on the lead.

It’s almost comical to hear them take on Covid is their main issue and all they have to offer is a mask mandate which essentially has been in effect for months. During the nominations the two idiots were standing there in black masks. Did they not get tested?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 28, 2020, 01:27:17 PM
After his 20 minute Teleprompter speech, Biden went into hiding for a week. Trump is out there the day after.



2020 election: Trump to hold post-RNC New Hampshire campaign rally


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/28/2020-election-trump-hold-post-rnc-new-hampshire-campaign-rally/5655406002/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 28, 2020, 11:37:01 PM

This is becoming more apparent with each passing day. The campaign appears to be in disarray. They were up by a field goal in the second quarter of the game and thought that they could sit on the lead.

It’s almost comical to hear them take on Covid is their main issue and all they have to offer is a mask mandate which essentially has been in effect for months. During the nominations the two idiots were standing there in black masks. Did they not get tested?

They really are in disarray.  Their campaign lacks focus.  I don't know who is managing their campaigns, but they are doing a lousy job.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 29, 2020, 07:12:13 AM
They really are in disarray.  Their campaign lacks focus.  I don't know who is managing their campaigns, but they are doing a lousy job.

At the end of the day, it’s still on the candidate. This guy is just a goof:





One of the few things that I agree with Obama on is Biden’s ability to fuck things up. He’s was sounding good there but in the ends he fails.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: escrima on August 29, 2020, 07:32:21 AM
Trump will win again ;)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 29, 2020, 08:06:18 AM
Trump will win again ;)


And they know it:

Bill Maher to Joy Reid: 'Very nervous' about Biden's chances after GOP convention | TheHill


https://thehill.com/homenews/media/514250-bill-maher-to-joy-reid-very-nervous-about-bidens-chances-after-gop-convention

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: escrima on August 29, 2020, 08:08:46 AM

And they know it:

Bill Maher to Joy Reid: 'Very nervous' about Biden's chances after GOP convention | TheHill


https://thehill.com/homenews/media/514250-bill-maher-to-joy-reid-very-nervous-about-bidens-chances-after-gop-convention

bidens own people do not believe in him
this is true..that slow fuck will never rule our Land..NEVER
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 29, 2020, 10:21:34 AM
bidens own people do not believe in him
this is true..that slow fuck will never rule our Land..NEVER

Trump agrees:


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Now that Biden’s Polls are dropping fast, he has agreed to get out of his basement and start campaignin,“in ten days.” Sadly, that is a very slow reaction time for a President. Our beloved USA needs a much faster, smarter, and tougher response than that. Get out there today, Joe!



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: escrima on August 29, 2020, 10:27:39 AM
Trump agrees:


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Now that Biden’s Polls are dropping fast, he has agreed to get out of his basement and start campaignin,“in ten days.” Sadly, that is a very slow reaction time for a President. Our beloved USA needs a much faster, smarter, and tougher response than that. Get out there today, Joe!

slow Joe a Communist B@stard
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on August 29, 2020, 10:31:24 AM
slow Joe a Communist B@stard

I see him as a shameless career politician who has no real beliefs about anything other than what will get him elected, same as Harris. In that way, they make a good team.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on August 31, 2020, 10:11:59 PM
(https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/118476834_3550550608331103_7958468340266908356_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=kqBp4vfMcygAX9QoDrr&_nc_ht=scontent-lax3-1.xx&oh=bd4a3be4ff706a531a79482af7e36cc1&oe=5F740965)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on August 31, 2020, 10:28:49 PM
After his 20 minute Teleprompter speech, Biden went into hiding for a week. Trump is out there the day after.



2020 election: Trump to hold post-RNC New Hampshire campaign rally


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/08/28/2020-election-trump-hold-post-rnc-new-hampshire-campaign-rally/5655406002/

Trump made a major blunder by supporting this 17 yr old extremist ,now charged with murdering 2 people.

His self defense reasoning  is legally weak in this situation .

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-defends-kenosha-shooter-kyle-rittenhouse-003429384.html
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 01, 2020, 04:33:21 AM
Trump made a major blunder by supporting this 17 yr old extremist ,now charged with murdering 2 people.

His self defense reasoning  is legally weak in this situation .

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-defends-kenosha-shooter-kyle-rittenhouse-003429384.html

False - watch all the videos.  Kyle maybe convicted with being a minor w a gun, thats it. 

Crybaby liberals are going to meltdown again. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 01, 2020, 06:49:00 AM
You’re never going to see a guy get thrown under the bus faster by his party than when Biden loses in November, talkative is if he even makes it.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 01, 2020, 07:32:49 AM
False - watch all the videos.  Kyle maybe convicted with being a minor w a gun, thats it. 

Crybaby liberals are going to meltdown again.

He's been charged with murder .
https://www.foxnews.com/us/charges-filed-rittenhouse-kenosha-shootings
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 01, 2020, 09:25:26 AM
You’re never going to see a guy get thrown under the bus faster by his party than when Biden loses in November, talkative is if he even makes it.

I don't think dems will do that to our next President.
Latest polls don't look good for a Trump 2nd term. Ouch. ;)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2020/09/01/no-bounce-biden-keeps-strong-battleground-lead-in-polls-post-convention/?ocid=uxbndlbing#29bb37544e3b
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Palumboism on September 01, 2020, 09:41:32 AM
Donna Hylton, served a 27 year sentence for a crime committed when she was 19 years old. Since her release over 8 years ago, she's advocated for the "humanitarian" release of aging prisoners. She's definitely got a complicated history. I don't know what prompted the DNC producers to include her. Her past is no secret. They must have had a good reason.

Did Donna come off sounding like she'd lost her marbles? I don't know, I didn't catch her appearance on the DNC. I did watch Kimberly Guilfoyle's speech. I am not the only person who questioned her sanity.

A Nine-teen year old is an adult capable of making their own decisions and being held responsible for them - that's a sophomore in college.  You're really downplaying the seriousness of her crime.  She kidnapped and tortured a man for days before killing him by as stuffing him in a trunk where he died of asphyxiation. 

AP
Seven Arraigned In Kidnap, Beating Death of Long Island Businessman

Vigliarolo was lured the apartment of one of the defendants, then was driven to the Harlem apartment, where he was stripped, tied to a bed and fed once a day while his captors demanded that he pay money to Miranda.

When his body was found several days later, Vigliarolo had been ″burned with cigarettes, beaten with a blunt instrument, and his sternum (breast bone) had been fractured,″ Lenoir said.

He apparently died of ″asphyxiation and the deprivations of his imprisonment″ on April 2, days before a ransom demand was made Friday, the prosecutor said.

https://apnews.com/238bc4f1039577402504b84eca4515d0 (https://apnews.com/238bc4f1039577402504b84eca4515d0)


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 01, 2020, 10:00:51 AM
He's been charged with murder .
https://www.foxnews.com/us/charges-filed-rittenhouse-kenosha-shootings

As we saw in St. Louis, idiot prosecutors can charge with whatever they want, but it won’t stick.

The more important fact here is that a 17 year old was attacked by a rioting mob of left-wing supporters and he is still alive.

I understand a complete fucking retard like you siding with the rioting mob and hoping for the politicized murder of a child. It’s the exact reason that liberal assholes like you, PrimePedo Jay Milton Osborne III, and Strawman Rob Ziruolo need to be put down for good. No discussion, no negotiation, no sympathy or mercy, hunted down and ended forever.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 01, 2020, 10:27:13 AM
I don't think dems will do that to our next President.
Latest polls don't look good for a Trump 2nd term. Ouch. ;)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2020/09/01/no-bounce-biden-keeps-strong-battleground-lead-in-polls-post-convention/?ocid=uxbndlbing#29bb37544e3b

We should have betting on this race. It would be my pleasure to take some of your money.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 01, 2020, 11:36:50 AM
I don't think dems will do that to our next President.
Latest polls don't look good for a Trump 2nd term. Ouch. ;)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2020/09/01/no-bounce-biden-keeps-strong-battleground-lead-in-polls-post-convention/?ocid=uxbndlbing#29bb37544e3b


Wrong again:

Trump polls 19% with blacks. That’s game over. The National is within the margin of error.

“ Biden leads with all minority groups, albeit by different ranges. Biden leads with Asians 76% to 11%, Blacks/African Americans 77% to 19%, and Hispanic voters break for Biden 60% to 37%. White voters break for President Trump 56% to 41%.”


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 01, 2020, 12:28:36 PM
As we saw in St. Louis, idiot prosecutors can charge with whatever they want, but it won’t stick.

The more important fact here is that a 17 year old was attacked by a rioting mob of left-wing supporters and he is still alive.

I understand a complete fucking retard like you siding with the rioting mob and hoping for the politicized murder of a child. It’s the exact reason that liberal assholes like you, PrimePedo Jay Milton Osborne III, and Strawman Rob Ziruolo need to be put down for good. No discussion, no negotiation, no sympathy or mercy, hunted down and ended forever.

1. I agree that the charges will (likely) be changed to murder II or manslaughter due to the riot conditions and chaos.
    My main issue with this kid is,  he traveled to be there and wasn't defending his home or family business.
    I  don't like it when anyone uses violent means , looting , blocking streets in the name of "protest".

    To be fair, I also think outside agitators with fireworks , rocks or paintball guns need to be arrested regardless of their politics.
    Biden strongly condemned violent actions and looting  and said they weren't legit protests and  need to be prosecuted. ( Pittsburg speech AUG 31 )

2. I defend the actions of the St Louis couple that brandished arms but did not shoot when confronted by an protest mob.
    It never got to that point, so they never needed to fire their weapons at the protest mob.
    I do think the protest organizers should be charged with the cost of the iron gate they mangled.

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-gun-couple-investigated-clash-protesters
    I own the same type of AR-15 ( and other guns) , strictly for home defense.
    You can be sure, I'd have be armed and ready, if some angry mob or robber tried to enter my home.

    As a former US marine, I can tell ya , we didn't get trained to go in and "talk" to the enemy. ;)

   I'm 100% behind defending your home or property via legal arms, but I'm against any form of violent protests, period.
   I'm a big supporter of the 1st and 2nd amendments.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on September 01, 2020, 12:40:31 PM


    As a former US marine, I can tell ya , we didn't get trained to go in and "talk" to the enemy. ;)

   
   


But you talk,talk,talk, .............so you must be fat old fuck like Jay III !.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 01, 2020, 01:07:30 PM

But you talk,talk,talk, .............so you must be fat old fuck like Jay III !.


It's a forum , not a combat zone. ;)

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 01, 2020, 03:11:57 PM
Trump's friend Putin wants him to win, so once again he's helping him with his campaign.

Russians again targeting American's with disinformation.....

The Internet Research Agency, also known as Glavset and known in Russian Internet slang as the Trolls from Olgino, is a Russian company engaged in online influence operations on behalf of Russian business and political interests. It is linked to Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin and based in Saint Petersburg.

Facebook And Twitter Remove Russia-Backed Accounts Targeting Left-Leaning Voters

The Russian operatives, according to Facebook, primarily used a website called PeaceData. It billed itself as a news site that aimed to shed light on corruption, abuse of power and human rights.

(https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/09/01/screenshot-333-_custom-6b08ca06fc7d8449576b71fad6349c752230414c-s1600-c85.png)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 01, 2020, 05:56:46 PM
Bring on the debates.

Hairplugs Biden is the absolute best the Democrats have to offer and I want to see that up against President Donald Trump for 90 uninterrupted minutes.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 01, 2020, 06:10:00 PM
Bring on the debates.

Hairplugs Biden is the absolute best the Democrats have to offer and I want to see that up against President Donald Trump for 90 uninterrupted minutes.

Biden’s speech in Pittsburgh. Six reporters and no questions. Afterwards it was back to the basement. Most pathetic campaign ever.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 01, 2020, 06:16:17 PM
President Trump's support among black voters rose 9 percentage points amid the Republican National Convention, a new Hill-HarrisX poll finds.

Bring on the debates....show no mercy for Hairplugs Biden.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on September 01, 2020, 06:38:46 PM
He's been charged with murder .
https://www.foxnews.com/us/charges-filed-rittenhouse-kenosha-shootings
If they would have killed Kyle, we wouldn't know his name.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on September 01, 2020, 09:04:16 PM
Biden’s speech in Pittsburgh. Six reporters and no questions. Afterwards it was back to the basement. Most pathetic campaign ever.


What morons get impressed by him  ??? ::)

(obw, is that image of American future  ::))

This is so  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on September 01, 2020, 09:12:03 PM


It's a forum , not a combat zone. ;)

'
As ex marine, you are suppose to fight those : 'DEAD TO AMERICA'  SCREAMERS !!!!.

Have YOU KIll any of them ???.

They will not stop in Portland,Kenosha,.......................they will visit U too !.

Yeah ,Richo Rich will escape to Hawaii,Australia,New Zealand ........................ .BS  ;)

Open your  :o :o :o

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on September 01, 2020, 09:40:07 PM
Biden’s speech in Pittsburgh. Six reporters and no questions. Afterwards it was back to the basement. Most pathetic campaign ever.
Got to love the silly circles.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 01, 2020, 10:19:57 PM


It's a forum , not a combat zone. ;)

Howard, have you ever touched other people’s children the way Joe Biden touches other people’s children?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 01, 2020, 11:42:53 PM
'
As ex marine, you are suppose to fight those : 'DEAD TO AMERICA'  SCREAMERS !!!!.

Have YOU KIll any of them ???.

They will not stop in Portland,Kenosha,.......................they will visit U too !.

Yeah ,Richo Rich will escape to Hawaii,Australia,New Zealand ........................ .BS  ;)

Open your  :o :o :o

Said Trump's campaign sidekick.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on September 02, 2020, 02:27:54 PM
Said Trump's campaign sidekick.


Saggy, I'll be there if real action ( ;)) start in November !.

No flaying restrictions for me  ;)

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 02, 2020, 03:34:12 PM
I now think there is real chance  Trump will quit. 100% serious.
At some point, he's walking off before he's defeated and humiliated .

Maybe he'll fabricate some medical issue or just say fuk it and walk off during the 1st debate.
I just don't see him hunkering down and staying to course . 

I already know what you Trumpers think , so post whatever. ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 02, 2020, 03:37:15 PM
I now think there is real chance  Trump will quit. 100% serious.
At some point, he's walking off before he's defeated and humiliated .

Maybe he'll fabricate some medical issue or just say fuk it and walk off during the 1st debate.
I just don't see him hunkering down and staying to course . 

I already know what you Trumpers think , so post whatever. ::)

Didn’t you pick Hillary to win in 2016?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: tom joad on September 02, 2020, 04:07:50 PM
https://twitter.com/natesilver538/status/1301190941110341632?s=21

@NateSilver538

Chance of a Biden Electoral College win if he wins the popular vote by X points:

0-1 points:  just 6%!
1-2 points:  22%
2-3 points:  46%
3-4 points:  74%
4-5 points:  89%
5-6 points:  98%
6-7 points:  99%

. . . The Electoral College is not really *safe* for Biden unless he wins by 5+.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 02, 2020, 04:25:28 PM
CPD Announces 2020 Debate Moderators
Sep 2, 2020
https://www.debates.org/2020/09/02/cpd-announces-2020-debate-moderators/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on September 02, 2020, 05:08:36 PM
https://twitter.com/natesilver538/status/1301190941110341632?s=21

@NateSilver538

Chance of a Biden Electoral College win if he wins the popular vote by X points:

0-1 points:  just 6%!
1-2 points:  22%
2-3 points:  46%
3-4 points:  74%
4-5 points:  89%
5-6 points:  98%
6-7 points:  99%

. . . The Electoral College is not really *safe* for Biden unless he wins by 5+.

I think Nate has learned from 2016, when Hillary won by two points, 48.2% to 46.1%.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 02, 2020, 07:18:31 PM
CPD Announces 2020 Debate Moderators
Sep 2, 2020
https://www.debates.org/2020/09/02/cpd-announces-2020-debate-moderators/


There is NO WAY in hades those debates happen. They would have to enact a mercy rule in less than 15 minutes.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on September 02, 2020, 07:22:28 PM
I think they should debate. I would be disappointed if they didn't. The right thinks Biden can't survive a debate. I think he can. The left thinks Trump might embarrass him by insulting him way beyond what a normal adult would. I say so what? Let the chips fall where they may   
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on September 02, 2020, 07:50:40 PM
I think they should debate. I would be disappointed if they didn't. The right thinks Biden can't survive a debate. I think he can. The left thinks Trump might embarrass him by insulting him way beyond what a normal adult would. I say so what? Let the chips fall where they may
I think anyone pushing Biden should be ashamed of themselves. The man is obviously does not have a healthy, cognitive mind.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on September 02, 2020, 07:56:37 PM
I think anyone pushing Biden should be ashamed of themselves. The man is obviously does not have a healthy, cognitive mind.

I realize that is the right wing plot, but his acceptance speech blew holes in that. Now people clinging to that hope are doing just that, clinging... so let the debates begin


RELEASE THE DEBATES!!!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 02, 2020, 08:12:55 PM
I think they should debate. I would be disappointed if they didn't. The right thinks Biden can't survive a debate. I think he can. The left thinks Trump might embarrass him by insulting him way beyond what a normal adult would. I say so what? Let the chips fall where they may

LOL...

The Republicans hope President Trump can win 4 more years and return the country to greatness.

The Democrats hope Hairplugs Biden can read for 4 more months.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 02, 2020, 11:28:42 PM
I now think there is real chance  Trump will quit. 100% serious.
At some point, he's walking off before he's defeated and humiliated .

Maybe he'll fabricate some medical issue or just say fuk it and walk off during the 1st debate.
I just don't see him hunkering down and staying to course . 

I already know what you Trumpers think , so post whatever. ::)

I wish. I don't think this is going to happen. Even if he wanted to bow out, the republican leadership won't let him do it. He's completely malleable. Just play to his ego and he's butter in the sun. Tell him he's having a good hair day and he will carry on. LOL!

Another thing, when he's done and no longer has the protection of holding office,  he will  be legally burned to a crisp. All the protections he's enjoyed because of so far are going bye, bye. Let him rot in jail.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 03, 2020, 08:06:37 AM
This is a typical Biden tweet,  meaningless, political  bullshit. That’s why he has no real support. At the end of the day, he’s just a tired politician.

Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
1m
I've always believed we're at our best when we act as one America. It's time for us to come together, propel our nation across this turbulent threshold, and build a better future for all.



Btw, Biden has 9 million twitter followers; Trump 86 million. Same drill on Facebook. Trump owns him on Social Media.



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 03, 2020, 08:42:13 AM
https://us24news.com/blog/2020/09/03/biden-to-meet-jacob-blakes-father-despite-his-long-history-of-vile-racist-anti-semitic-and-anti-christian-posts


 :o  :o  :o

Please let this be real.   
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 03, 2020, 08:48:07 AM
I wish. I don't think this is going to happen. Even if he wanted to bow out, the republican leadership won't let him do it. He's completely malleable. Just play to his ego and he's butter in the sun. Tell him he's having a good hair day and he will carry on. LOL!

Another thing, when he's done and no longer has the protection of holding office,  he will  be legally burned to a crisp. All the protections he's enjoyed because of so far are going bye, bye. Let him rot in jail.



(https://media0.giphy.com/media/NRupwC0898OESGze8N/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on September 03, 2020, 08:52:20 AM
So now he's either going to quit or go to jail after?

LOL, it's amazing the coping mechanisms this man is forcing people to create.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 03, 2020, 09:48:32 AM
So now he's either going to quit or go to jail after?

LOL, it's amazing the coping mechanisms this man is forcing people to create.

The hopes and dreams of a senile old pedo sucker of cocks.

And the moron will believe the media hype train all the way to a Trump super-majority and then jump on the CNN excuse of the day for why Trump was re-elected.

The histrionics from PrimePedo, Howard, and little Robbie the $240 Strawman are hilarious.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 03, 2020, 10:16:28 AM
So now he's either going to quit or go to jail after?

LOL, it's amazing the coping mechanisms this man is forcing people to create.

The Trump side would never suggest we "lock up" a political opponent . ;)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 03, 2020, 10:23:10 AM
The Trump side would never suggest we "lock up" a political opponent . ;)

That’s gonna leave a mark🥊



https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/pennsylvania_trump_46_biden_46

POLITICS
Pennsylvania: Trump 46%, Biden 46%

Worrisome for the former vice president is his 67% black support, low for a Democrat, with the incumbent earning 27% of the black vote in Pennsylvania. Trump leads among whites and other minority voters
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 03, 2020, 12:43:35 PM
DEMOCRAT MAYORS FLEEING THEIR HOMES!

 - CNN

The libidiots don’t seem to be fully on board with “Joe and the Hoe’s” party platform.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 03, 2020, 01:41:29 PM
Probably the most astute thing that Obama has ever said is to not underestimate Biden’s ability to fuck things up. The guy just gives a speech on public safety yesterday and the first thing he does when he gets off the plane in Kenosha is to shake hands with somebody.



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 03, 2020, 03:19:53 PM
Now you see why Biden’s handlers want him hidden:


Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
30m
Joe Hiden’ gets off his airplane, grabs and shakes a rather stunned man’s hand (like in the old days), then touches his (Joe’s) face and mask with the same hand. No crowd, no enthusiasm for Joe today. Law & Order!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: balzac on September 03, 2020, 03:48:30 PM
 :D

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 03, 2020, 04:28:14 PM
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   CNN                           Biden 51, Trump 43   Biden +8
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   USA Today/Suffolk   Biden 50, Trump 43   Biden +7
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Grinnell/Selzer           Biden 49, Trump 41   Biden +8
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Rasmussen Reports   Biden 49, Trump 45   Biden +4
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Economist/YouGov   Biden 51, Trump 40   Biden +11
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Quinnipiac                   Biden 52, Trump 42   Biden +10
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   The Hill/HarrisX           Biden 46, Trump 40   Biden +6
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   IBD/TIPP                   Biden 49, Trump 41   Biden +8
General Election: Trump vs. Biden    USA Today/Suffolk   Biden 47, Trump 42,    Biden +5
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 03, 2020, 05:14:54 PM
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   CNN                           Biden 51, Trump 43   Biden +8
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   USA Today/Suffolk   Biden 50, Trump 43   Biden +7
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Grinnell/Selzer           Biden 49, Trump 41   Biden +8
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Rasmussen Reports   Biden 49, Trump 45   Biden +4
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Economist/YouGov   Biden 51, Trump 40   Biden +11
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   Quinnipiac                   Biden 52, Trump 42   Biden +10
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   The Hill/HarrisX           Biden 46, Trump 40   Biden +6
General Election: Trump vs. Biden   IBD/TIPP                   Biden 49, Trump 41   Biden +8
General Election: Trump vs. Biden    USA Today/Suffolk   Biden 47, Trump 42,    Biden +5

You thought Hillary would win in 2016, right?


Trump 330EV
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 03, 2020, 05:53:43 PM
(https://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-01-at-9.02.52-AM.gif)

I remember it well.

And the liberal lemmings believed it.

President Donald Trump is Barack Obama‘a and Hillary Clinton’s greatest legacy to America.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 03, 2020, 06:59:38 PM
&app=desktop


LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 03, 2020, 07:35:13 PM
(https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/VvVZB7al6J3l9ZpMRDLUMpgnQblWrmpxe5rTfngssxqv0MrG2w9IV74ZdOrn6HzwX5hdohCVV-l7LYJWfTbnQ-0GOlyxyCfKh4MTjzvtPZgWEO9zzmkp23H675oLvRzRt2VereufIJu94_Hzj_o)

Sit back for a moment and remember how the liberal cockiness and smugness turned into openly crying in public.

The thought of Rachel Madcow crying on live TV still makes me laugh out loud.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 04, 2020, 09:38:24 AM
You thought Hillary would win in 2016, right?


Trump 330EV

What's your point. I'm just posting stats. Make of them what you want.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 04, 2020, 09:41:16 AM
What's your point. I'm just posting stats. Make of them what you want.

The point is you predicted Hillary on the basis of those same stats and you were wrong.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 04, 2020, 07:19:25 PM
Powell’s 3,000-word address could have been summarized in just one sentence: “President Trump was right; we were wrong.”

MAGA BITCHES!

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS THE GREATEST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on September 04, 2020, 08:58:21 PM
I realize that is the right wing plot, but his acceptance speech blew holes in that. Now people clinging to that hope are doing just that, clinging... so let the debates begin


RELEASE THE DEBATES!!!
No it didn't. You only say that because you hate Trump.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 04, 2020, 10:57:43 PM
#BidenRiots
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on September 05, 2020, 04:16:13 AM
Thats all the the libturds have, lying senile Biden, lying insane Kamala. Thats your best? Really?
Trump craps "pyramid/McDonald shits" with more brains than those 20 kuntz.
Its so cringey and embarrassing. You really are an insane cult of brain-dead twats. Trump's pretty tapped, but we know how things were going before the China-Virus.
Best economy in 50 years. You'd rather see your country fail, than him succeed.

Really bizzarre commie, traitor type shit.

Go slice your libtard wrists kuntz.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on September 05, 2020, 04:21:43 AM
And the hero to the all-insane demented commie libtards!!!  What an epic Champeen!  ??? (Fuckin' dumb kunt).

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 05, 2020, 01:56:28 PM
#BidenRiots
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on September 05, 2020, 02:19:28 PM
#BidenRiots


... another BLM/Antifa restaurant rioting in NY city , where is NY Mafia when you need them ......................
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 05, 2020, 02:34:01 PM

... another BLM/Antifa restaurant rioting in NY city , where is NY Mafia when you need them ......................

#BidenRiots
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: balzac on September 06, 2020, 02:19:35 PM
 :D

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2020, 02:38:37 PM
(https://media.makeameme.org/created/as-if-being-6037c9759c.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on September 06, 2020, 05:10:15 PM
You thought Hillary would win in 2016, right?

Trump 330EV

Joe 30330  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2020, 05:25:55 PM
(https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a2RVLY9_460s.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: mphgrove on September 06, 2020, 07:06:19 PM
And the hero to the all-insane demented commie libtards!!!  What an epic Champeen!  ??? (Fuckin' dumb kunt).



Oh come on, you are talking about half the USA if you include the swing voters who haven’t made up their mind. Half the country are traitors? That just not add up. Nor should the “libtards” refer to Trump enthusiasts in that vein either. Everybody wishes the best for the nation in their own different ways.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 06, 2020, 08:17:35 PM
(https://images7.memedroid.com/images/UPLOADED625/5e9cfbe24d226.jpeg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 08, 2020, 06:50:28 AM
Anita Hill Endorses Joe Biden, Says He Would Listen to Her Now
Newsweek ^ | September 5, 2020 | MATT KEELEY
Posted on 9/8/2020, 9:39:57 AM by lowbridge

In a new interview, Anita Hill said that she plans to vote for former Vice President Joe Biden in November, and hopes to work with him on gender issues if he's elected.

In a clip released Saturday in advance of the CNN documentary Fight for the White House: Joe Biden's Long Journey set to air Monday, Hill told CNN Chief Political Analyst Gloria Berger that she will vote for Biden, despite their clash 29 years ago when Biden chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing when Hill accused now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment.

"Notwithstanding all of his limitations in the past, and the mistakes that he made in the past, notwithstanding those—at this point, between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, I think Joe Biden is the person who should be elected in November," Hill said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...



LMFAO
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on September 08, 2020, 11:16:49 PM
Anita Hill Endorses Joe Biden, Says He Would Listen to Her Now
Newsweek ^ | September 5, 2020 | MATT KEELEY
Posted on 9/8/2020, 9:39:57 AM by lowbridge

In a new interview, Anita Hill said that she plans to vote for former Vice President Joe Biden in November, and hopes to work with him on gender issues if he's elected.

In a clip released Saturday in advance of the CNN documentary Fight for the White House: Joe Biden's Long Journey set to air Monday, Hill told CNN Chief Political Analyst Gloria Berger that she will vote for Biden, despite their clash 29 years ago when Biden chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing when Hill accused now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment.

"Notwithstanding all of his limitations in the past, and the mistakes that he made in the past, notwithstanding those—at this point, between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, I think Joe Biden is the person who should be elected in November," Hill said.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...



LMFAO

LOL. Biden, at age 74 has overcome the limitations of his past and now understand. Also, he's not Donald Trump, so yeah, vote for him. That's fucking rich. My personal political positions aside I really do wish that the Democrats had put up someone actually worth voting for on his or her own merits instead of "well, he's not Trump!"
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on September 09, 2020, 06:04:57 AM
LOL. Biden, at age 74 has overcome the limitations of his past and now understand. Also, he's not Donald Trump, so yeah, vote for him. That's fucking rich. My personal political positions aside I really do wish that the Democrats had put up someone actually worth voting for on his or her own merits instead of "well, he's not Trump!"

That's been my big issue as well.

But they focused all their energy on ousting/hating Trump rather than reflecting on why he got elected in the first place.  Then, when they realized it was either Biden or Bernie, they realized only one of them had a chance of winning.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: IroNat on September 09, 2020, 07:49:36 AM
LOL. Biden, at age 74 has overcome the limitations of his past and now understand. Also, he's not Donald Trump, so yeah, vote for him. That's fucking rich. My personal political positions aside I really do wish that the Democrats had put up someone actually worth voting for on his or her own merits instead of "well, he's not Trump!"
Biden will be 78 this November.  Born 1942.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on September 09, 2020, 08:08:57 AM
Biden "This virus has caused 100's of years, Im Joe Bidens husband"... What a fukkin' mindless libturd.   ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2020, 09:11:28 AM
President Donald Trump = Nobel Prize winner.

Absolutely the greatest President in the history of the United States.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 09, 2020, 10:08:12 AM
Biden will be 78 this November.  Born 1942.


78 and acts 88. Should be in a rocking chair somewhere.

These dinosaur politicians need to retire. If they didn't owe so many favors from 50 years of graft they probably would.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on September 09, 2020, 10:08:21 AM
President Donald Trump = Nobel Prize winner.

Absolutely the greatest President in the history of the United States.

 8) 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 09, 2020, 10:40:16 AM
(https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/a2RVLY9_460s.jpg)
.

LOL

This will inflame a lot of Libs.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2020, 11:20:18 AM
.

LOL

This will inflame a lot of Libs.

Hairplugs Biden is just camouflage for the real communists who control the Democrat Party
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on September 09, 2020, 07:57:37 PM
LOL. Biden, at age 74 has overcome the limitations of his past and now understand. Also, he's not Donald Trump, so yeah, vote for him. That's fucking rich. My personal political positions aside I really do wish that the Democrats had put up someone actually worth voting for on his or her own merits instead of "well, he's not Trump!"

You are a very intelligent human being. I agree that there were better choices. Having said that, a Biden is much better than a Trump. Both choices should tell us America isn't the country we thought it was but after 3.5 years of Trump certainly an educated person such as yourself can see Biden is the better choice? If not so educate me on it
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2020, 08:04:57 PM
You are a very intelligent human being. I agree that there were better choices. Having said that, a Biden is much better than a Trump. Both choices should tell us America isn't the country we thought it was but after 3.5 years of Trump certainly an educated person such as yourself can see Biden is the better choice? If not so educate me on it

So let me get this straight...Hairplugs Biden has all the answers, but he waited 48 years to share them?

LOL!

Every vote for Hairplugs Biden is proof the media can convince the dumbest of society of anything.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on September 09, 2020, 08:18:41 PM
So let me get this straight...Hairplugs Biden has all the answers, but he waited 48 years to share them?

LOL!

Every vote for Hairplugs Biden is proof the media can convince the dumbest of society of anything.

Let the adults in the room talk Walter..go out and burn a cross or something
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on September 09, 2020, 08:34:02 PM
Biden will be 78 this November.  Born 1942.

My bad. I confused him with the other septuagenarian “running”.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on September 09, 2020, 09:12:41 PM
Let the adults in the room talk Walter..go out and burn a cross or something

Biden: “The NAACP has supported me every time I have run for office.”

NAACP: “Hell no we didn’t.”
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 10, 2020, 06:32:38 AM
You are a very intelligent human being. I agree that there were better choices. Having said that, a Biden is much better than a Trump. Both choices should tell us America isn't the country we thought it was but after 3.5 years of Trump certainly an educated person such as yourself can see Biden is the better choice? If not so educate me on it

Have you ever considered that you might be on the wrong side? In NYC, I personally saw white liberal kids walking down the street carrying signs that said “defund the police.”

As for me, I think you deserve every cent of your pension.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on September 10, 2020, 07:26:18 AM
You are a very intelligent human being. I agree that there were better choices. Having said that, a Biden is much better than a Trump. Both choices should tell us America isn't the country we thought it was but after 3.5 years of Trump certainly an educated person such as yourself can see Biden is the better choice? If not so educate me on it

It has nothing do with education, personal values are what's driving it.  An "educated" person can see both sides of why one candidate is preferred over the other.

Pro Trump people may value strong military, strong borders, policies that promote business growth, trade reform, standing up to Iran/China, getting out of wars, supporting the police, etc.

If those values outweigh the downsides he brings......they may not view Biden as a better choice.

And that's without even attacking Biden on his shortcomings.

I am concerned a second term will cause even more unrest, even if I deem a lot of it self-induced by people who let themselves get lost in it.  However, Biden's shortcomings and the thought of President Harris (PUKE) could be worse overall.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 10, 2020, 09:38:29 AM
Could you imagine having your hopes and dreams tied to this guy?


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on September 11, 2020, 09:39:32 PM
Have you ever considered that you might be on the wrong side? In NYC, I personally saw white liberal kids walking down the street carrying signs that said “defund the police.”

As for me, I think you deserve every cent of your pension.

Defunding the police for a small percentage of people means disbanding police departments. Those are the radical nutjobs like those from the Peaceful Streets Project. The majority that I hear are talking about reallocating responsibilities that they feel shouldn't be a police function and diverting the resources to civilians. I think there is room for a realistic discussion and review of Departments and how they are set up with an eye on seeing if there are jobs that can be done cheaper better by civilians. We've already done that in some places like forensics. Instead of having an officer who gets 4 hrs  block training on fingerprinting and makes $30 an hour. After the scene is secured by an officer and the information for the report is gathered a civilian processes the scene. Since it is all they do, and they receive more in depth training it makes sense at $10 or $15 an hour to have them do it.
I've watched the Department I was at grow from 600 officers to 2300 officers. But patrol shifts were still short manned many times because over the years the additional officers were funnelled into specialized units like DWI, Mental Health, Code Enforcement, Highway Enforcement, District Representative Units etc etc. At some point I think and this is just my opinion, we lost sight of our function and became the band aid for all of societies ills.
So when we're talking "Defunding the police" I think it really matters what exactly they mean.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Thin Lizzy on September 12, 2020, 08:19:03 AM
In New York City, we have a demoralize the police project going on and these are the results:



https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/02/nyregion/nyc-shootings-murders.html

A Violent August in N.Y.C.: Shootings Double, and Murder Is Up by 50%

The city recorded 242 shootings in August, up from 91 last year, continuing a summer spike in gun violence that has become an issue in the presidential race. 

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 23, 2020, 01:10:30 PM
We had a Trump caravan in Hawaii.  I have never seen anything like this for a Republican candidate.  We are the bluest state in the country and Biden is going to carry Hawaii, but I have not seen much enthusiasm for Biden here at all.  I get the feeling this is happening all over the country. 

Also, some lady had "car trouble" in the middle of the road, with her car straddling a two-lane road, which temporarily stopped the caravan.  That's what liberals/progressives do. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 23, 2020, 01:12:50 PM
Wow.  Awesome.   ;D

WATCH: Hundreds of Amish Parade for Trump in Buggies
Todd Starnes
Sep 20, 2020

https://www.toddstarnes.com/politics/watch-hundreds-of-amish-parade-for-trump-in-buggies/?fbclid=IwAR0btM-Lfa26rci-4QGIfhBAUiVGjFS8F1ALJTEJ2FAtOJvba1643QGEdUA
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 23, 2020, 03:21:03 PM
We had a Trump caravan in Hawaii.  I have never seen anything like this for a Republican candidate.  We are the bluest state in the country and Biden is going to carry Hawaii, but I have not seen much enthusiasm for Biden here at all.  I get the feeling this is happening all over the country. 

Also, some lady had "car trouble" in the middle of the road, with her car straddling a two-lane road, which temporarily stopped the caravan.  That's what liberals/progressives do.

I know what you mean about highly visible Trumpers compared to Biden voters.
In my opinion, that's because we dens care more about the message then the man.

Trump is more a cult of personality with a lot of loyal nut huggers for the actual man.
You see similar reactions to the leaders in places like N Korea and Iran.

FYI< every getbigger, except Coach is jealous that you live in Hawaii.
Coach is jealous that you're taller then him LOL

Hope this helps.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Teutonic Knight 1 on September 23, 2020, 04:45:57 PM
I know what you mean about highly visible Trumpers compared to Biden voters.
In my opinion, that's because we dens care more about the message then the man.

Trump is more a cult of personality with a lot of loyal nut huggers for the actual man.
You see similar reactions to the leaders in places like N Korea and Iran.

FYI< every getbigger, except Coach is jealous that you live in Hawaii.
Coach is jealous that you're taller then him LOL

Hope this helps.

Geezzuuss, Howy U really talk,talk,talk,..................................................................... ::)

OBW, Howy impress us with yours location (I want to be mega jelaous) ............  8)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 23, 2020, 05:12:46 PM
I know what you mean about highly visible Trumpers compared to Biden voters.
In my opinion, that's because we dens care more about the message then the man.

Trump is more a cult of personality with a lot of loyal nut huggers for the actual man.
You see similar reactions to the leaders in places like N Korea and Iran.


Well that will probably be the most ridiculous thing I read today. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on September 23, 2020, 05:31:22 PM
Geezzuuss, Howy U really talk,talk,talk,..................................................................... ::)

OBW, Howy impress us with yours location (I want to be mega jelaous) ............  8)

Nothin' fancy, but I call it home.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 29, 2020, 11:36:57 AM
Trump requested that an independent third party verify that neither candidate is using a listening device for today's debate.  Biden refused. 

Biden requested a break every thirty minutes.  Trump refused. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on September 29, 2020, 01:06:06 PM
I would have a signal jammer of some sort on me if I was Trump.  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on September 29, 2020, 10:27:12 PM
Trump requested that an independent third party verify that neither candidate is using a listening device for today's debate.  Biden refused. 

I doubt a "listening device" would have been helpful, seeing how the debate devolved into a shouting match between two elderly idiots, both spouting barely coherent nonsense.


Biden requested a break every thirty minutes.  Trump refused.

No, that's a lie. The Trump campaign alleged that the Biden campaign asked for a break every thirty minutes but provided no proof of said request. The Biden campaign said that they did not, something which the Commission on Presidential Debates confirmed per foxnews.com (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-third-party-inspect-ears-electronic-devices).
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 29, 2020, 11:34:10 PM
Nothin' fancy, but I call it home.




 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on September 29, 2020, 11:38:25 PM
I doubt a "listening device" would have been helpful, seeing how the debate devolved into a shouting match between two elderly idiots, both spouting barely coherent nonsense.

This. But then, I am their age and trying to follow two people talking over each other simultaneously taxes my comprehension even though I am hard of hearing.  ;)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 30, 2020, 11:44:52 AM
I doubt a "listening device" would have been helpful, seeing how the debate devolved into a shouting match between two elderly idiots, both spouting barely coherent nonsense.


No, that's a lie. The Trump campaign alleged that the Biden campaign asked for a break every thirty minutes but provided no proof of said request. The Biden campaign said that they did not, something which the Commission on Presidential Debates confirmed per foxnews.com (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-third-party-inspect-ears-electronic-devices).

Definitely a terrible debate.  Like two kids arguing on the playground.  But I have seen pictures with people claiming Biden was wearing something.  I can't really tell. 

The Commission on Presidential Debates didn't confirm Biden never requested breaks in the link you provided.  It says this: 

"Fox News has reached out to the Commission on Presidential debates – the bipartisan organization that for more than three decades has organized and produced the debates – for a response to the requests.

The commission has traditionally pushed back against requests from the networks for commercial breaks."
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Eldon on September 30, 2020, 11:47:29 AM
Definitely a terrible debate.  Like two kids arguing on the playground. But I have seen pictures with people claiming Biden was wearing something.  I can't really tell. 

The Commission on Presidential Debates didn't confirm Biden never requested breaks in the link you provided.  It says this: 

"Fox News has reached out to the Commission on Presidential debates – the bipartisan organization that for more than three decades has organized and produced the debates – for a response to the requests.

The commission has traditionally pushed back against requests from the networks for commercial breaks."


https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1311337996667346944/photo/1


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on September 30, 2020, 11:48:04 AM
Definitely a terrible debate.  Like two kids arguing on the playground.  But I have seen pictures with people claiming Biden was wearing something.  I can't really tell. 

The Commission on Presidential Debates didn't confirm Biden never requested breaks in the link you provided.  It says this: 

"Fox News has reached out to the Commission on Presidential debates – the bipartisan organization that for more than three decades has organized and produced the debates – for a response to the requests.

The commission has traditionally pushed back against requests from the networks for commercial breaks."

Oops, you're right. I need to find the article that I read that in.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: avxo on September 30, 2020, 11:59:02 AM

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1311337996667346944/photo/1

and

https://www.allsafeindustries.com/store/p/9550-SEP110-Inductive-Loop-for-Covert-Communication.aspx

Technology from the 80s now available to the public. Fun.

So, the first question I have is, why would Biden need the PTT / microphone part of this device? And if he didn't, why risk having it on, making detection more likely? Also does anyone really believe that Biden is able to listen and repeat in real-time? And that it was actually possible for him to do that with the hubbub of Trump talking next to him?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: andreisdaman on September 30, 2020, 12:14:18 PM
Definitely a terrible debate.  Like two kids arguing on the playground.  But I have seen pictures with people claiming Biden was wearing something.  I can't really tell. 

The Commission on Presidential Debates didn't confirm Biden never requested breaks in the link you provided.  It says this: 

"Fox News has reached out to the Commission on Presidential debates – the bipartisan organization that for more than three decades has organized and produced the debates – for a response to the requests.

The commission has traditionally pushed back against requests from the networks for commercial breaks."

You used to be an intelligent guy....what happened to you, man??????????….now you're a conspiracy theorist
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: funk51 on September 30, 2020, 01:10:29 PM

 ;D ;D ;D
     ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? an episode of the rich and famous, but where's robin leach.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on September 30, 2020, 11:32:32 PM
You used to be an intelligent guy....what happened to you, man??????????….now you're a conspiracy theorist

What conspiracy theory are you talking about?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Grape Ape on October 01, 2020, 04:56:50 AM

In my opinion, that's because we dens care more about the message then the man.



Calling bullshit here.

You constantly rail on Trump being un-presidential, so you do care about the man.

Apply that philosophy and separate Trump's rhetoric and personality from his actions/accomplishments.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on October 01, 2020, 12:09:35 PM


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DLFbSvAVAAAChoQ.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on October 02, 2020, 10:53:02 AM
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/cl9yvypYA73CmxSXdkCKZQ--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTY0MA--/https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/W5Sbdc1efyMGKlhKyDxrBA--~B/aD01NjA7dz04NDA7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/la_times_articles_853/9e7eec8141023589a78a1fe6a62f9d01)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Gregzs on October 13, 2020, 06:12:03 PM
California GOP Admits to Planting Fake Ballot Boxes and Refuses to Remove Them

The containers, labeled “Official ballot drop-off box,” have appeared at churches, gyms, and gun stores in recent weeks.

The California GOP is blatantly breaking the state’s ballot harvesting law and daring California officials to do something about it.

The California Republican Party admitted to installing fake ballot-drop boxes, after reports that they were trying to trick voters prompted California officials to send a cease-and-desist letter to the party.

The GOP, however, said it will continue using the drop boxes, falsely claiming that the boxes are permissible under a California law that allows anyone to physically deliver a ballot on behalf of someone else, so long as they’re authorized to do so.

The containers, labeled “Official ballot drop-off box,” have appeared at churches, gyms, gun stores, and other locations in recent weeks. The boxes have appeared in at least three large California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, and Fresno. A church in Los Angeles County wrote in a Facebook post that the box located outside of the church was “approved and paid for by the GOP,” VICE News reported Monday.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla and Attorney General Xavier Becerra sent a cease-and-desist letter to the state Republican Party, giving them until Thursday, October 15, to remove the boxes. “The use of unauthorized, non-official vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes does not comply with state law governing ballot collection activities,” the letter said.

The California law, passed in the Democratic-controlled Legislature in 2017 and signed by then-Gov. Jerry Brown, expanded ballot collection privileges beyond a close relative and to anyone who has permission from the voter to drop it off on their behalf. Democrats say the new law makes it easier to vote, while Republicans have claimed it will increase voter fraud. Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino County officials said earlier this year that they haven’t found any such problems with collected ballots.

An Orange County election official said Monday that the ballots that are already in the fake boxes wouldn’t be thrown out, and that the voters who dropped their ballots there would be contacted “just to verify that they, in fact, designated their ballots to be picked up by somebody else,” the Orange County Register reported.

The California GOP blasted Padilla in a statement. "If Democrats are so concerned with ballot harvesting, they are the ones who wrote the legislation, voted for it, and Governor Jerry Brown signed it into law,” GOP spokesperson Hector Barajas said in a statement. “California Republicans would be happy to do away with ballot harvesting.”

Later, Barajas said the California GOP is “going to respond to the letter, continue our ballot harvest program, and not allow the Secretary of State to suppress the vote,” in a statement to NPR.

Padilla denied, however, that the ballot boxes are a form of ballot harvesting. The ballot collection law authorizes voters to physically hand their ballots to anyone they trust, including campaign workers, and deliver them to election offices.

“The problem here is with voters unknowingly delivering their ballots to an unofficial drop box mislabeled and misrepresented as an official drop box. They do not know who it is they’re surrendering their ballot to,” Padilla said Monday. “The impression [voters] have with the words ‘official drop box’ is that they’re surrendering it to a county official. And that’s not the case.”

https://www.vice.com/en/article/ep4jkp/california-gop-admits-to-admits-to-planting-fake-ballot-boxes-and-refuses-to-remove-them?utm_content=1602613807&utm_medium=social&utm_source=VICE_facebook&fbclid=IwAR25nc0tfX0oNh0J_-YSHtSuP0ebtuinugKeDHmEBD-1709T9yuI_WIVN6s
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on October 20, 2020, 03:29:31 PM
When you have two dishonest, not very bright, government hacks running against a president who helped create one of the best economies in American history, this is what you get.

Biden campaign faces backlash for TV ad depicting Michigan tech CEO as struggling bar owner
The Blind Pig co-owner blamed President Trump, not Democratic Gov. Whitmer, for his bar's economic downturn
By Danielle Wallace | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-campaign-ad-michigan-tech-ceo-struggling-bar-owner
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on October 20, 2020, 03:38:03 PM
IBD/TIPP Poll Shows Biden 48%, Trump 46%: ‘Biden Is Leaking Democratic Support’
HANNAH BLEAU  20 Oct 2020
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/20/ibd-tipp-poll-shows-biden-48-trump-46-biden-is-leaking-democratic-support/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on October 20, 2020, 04:35:53 PM
When you have two dishonest, not very bright, government hacks running against a president who helped create one of the best economies in American history, this is what you get.


I try to explain this to people that don't like Trump, turns out most of them just don't like his behaviour. One lady threw a fit because Trump danced recently..... ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on October 20, 2020, 11:05:39 PM
I try to explain this to people that don't like Trump, turns out most of them just don't like his behaviour. One lady threw a fit because Trump danced recently..... ::)

He has broken so many people.  lol  We've had presidents do some pretty awful things, like spy on reporters (Obama), use the IRS to target enemies (multiple presidents), etc.  Trump sends mean tweets.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on October 21, 2020, 04:11:11 PM
Uh oh.  Trump will never recover.

Seattle Storm Endorse Joe Biden–Kamala Harris Presidential Ticket
BEN PICKMAN
https://www.si.com/wnba/2020/10/21/seattle-storm-joe-biden-kamala-harris-ticket?fbclid=IwAR29x8OPFmrkyMBNrlnbXq47fppBkfjIOOTYwgny7Nvvo-ZhTs6tLcvJoaI
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: The Scott on October 21, 2020, 04:13:53 PM
Uh oh.  Trump will never recover.

Seattle Storm Endorse Joe Biden–Kamala Harris Presidential Ticket
BEN PICKMAN
https://www.si.com/wnba/2020/10/21/seattle-storm-joe-biden-kamala-harris-ticket?fbclid=IwAR29x8OPFmrkyMBNrlnbXq47fppBkfjIOOTYwgny7Nvvo-ZhTs6tLcvJoaI

What's next, a women's Sister-Team to the Clippers called the Los Angeles Clitters.  Fuck the Wesbian NBA.  Fuck the NBA.  Fuck the NFL, MLB, the Olympics and all sports. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: AbrahamG on October 21, 2020, 04:35:38 PM
What's next, a women's Sister-Team to the Clippers called the Los Angeles Clitters.  Fuck the Wesbian NBA.  Fuck the NBA.  Fuck the NFL, MLB, the Olympics and all sports.

Send me all your pertinent information.  I'm going to send you some pussy.  We need to take the edge off of you.  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on October 21, 2020, 05:33:27 PM
Uh oh.  Trump will never recover.

Seattle Storm Endorse Joe Biden–Kamala Harris Presidential Ticket
BEN PICKMAN
https://www.si.com/wnba/2020/10/21/seattle-storm-joe-biden-kamala-harris-ticket?fbclid=IwAR29x8OPFmrkyMBNrlnbXq47fppBkfjIOOTYwgny7Nvvo-ZhTs6tLcvJoaI
LMAO.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on October 21, 2020, 06:53:47 PM
He has broken so many people.
This is true, Straw Man is a perfect example of this.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: The Scott on October 21, 2020, 07:29:14 PM
Send me all your pertinent information.  I'm going to send you some pussy.  We need to take the edge off of you.  ;D
Well thank you my dear friend but I am way too old now to chase (I can't even run!) women anymore, LOL!  I am kinda like Dr. Banner in that my secret is I am always angry.  ;D ;D

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on October 24, 2020, 06:04:58 AM


Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on October 24, 2020, 07:06:00 PM
Brilliant short animation:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1320158318527016961
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Soul Crusher on October 29, 2020, 04:47:52 PM
(https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2020_43/1623773/joe-biden-corey-hixon-kb-main-201022_3a7b96b32aaa5d1023c1ae1031a51e5c.social_share_1200x630_center.jpg)

Is that some poor black kid Biden sent off to prison as part of his crime bill ?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on October 29, 2020, 10:32:39 PM
He makes a good point about the enthusiasm gap.

Michael Moore doesn't believe the polls showing Biden ahead of Trump
The presidential election, especially in swing states, is probably much closer than polls predict, according to the liberal film maker
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/media/michael-moore-says-dont-believe-the-polls-showing-biden-ahead-the-trump-vote-is-always-being-undercounted?fbclid=IwAR1RinD80fvtEBZEJgSgVSMDoxe4Ie8lqe-lO361mURluSpiAFC8sgdsGYE
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on October 31, 2020, 11:37:39 AM
Its over.. he called it!! Been 100% correct for each election so far..


Historian who correctly predicted every election since 1984 makes his call

https://www.yahoo.com/news/historian-correctly-predicted-every-election-005517231.html



wooooshh!!
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on October 31, 2020, 02:20:09 PM
How many of these did we see in 2016? How many polls showed Trump being annihilated by Killary? At least these polls are trying to make it look close. They're all bullshit.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on October 31, 2020, 02:40:42 PM
Its over.. he called it!! Been 100% correct for each election so far..

Historian who correctly predicted every election since 1984 makes his call

https://www.yahoo.com/news/historian-correctly-predicted-every-election-005517231.html

wooooshh!!

He picked Gore to win in 2000, but Gore won the popular vote, not the electoral college.  Seems inaccurate to claim he's been correct since 1984.
Still, an impressive record of predictions.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: IroNat on October 31, 2020, 04:20:17 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/8ML5MiJuYPG6Y/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on October 31, 2020, 04:24:36 PM
Its over.. he called it!! Been 100% correct for each election so far..

Historian who correctly predicted every election since 1984 makes his call

https://www.yahoo.com/news/historian-correctly-predicted-every-election-005517231.html

wooooshh!!

And he wants to repeal the 2nd amendment.  In this age of TDS, I find his interpretation of his 13 keys a bit strained.
We'll see.   :D

https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/xhgpcyoa/release/2
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: IroNat on October 31, 2020, 04:26:50 PM
(https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2020_43/1623773/joe-biden-corey-hixon-kb-main-201022_3a7b96b32aaa5d1023c1ae1031a51e5c.social_share_1200x630_center.jpg)

That's a retarded kid.

No offense.  Some of my best friends are retarded.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 01, 2020, 10:57:14 AM
He makes a good point about the enthusiasm gap.

Michael Moore doesn't believe the polls showing Biden ahead of Trump
The presidential election, especially in swing states, is probably much closer than polls predict, according to the liberal film maker
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/media/michael-moore-says-dont-believe-the-polls-showing-biden-ahead-the-trump-vote-is-always-being-undercounted?fbclid=IwAR1RinD80fvtEBZEJgSgVSMDoxe4Ie8lqe-lO361mURluSpiAFC8sgdsGYE

The reason you don't see Biden voters acting like Trumpers, is pretty simple:

1. We don't belong to a cult and don't need our guys name pasted all over our yard , truck or building.

2.  We view most hardcore Trumpers like Trump himself during the 1st debate.
    They're obnoxious, , in-your face and constantly yell insults at you.

Trumpers may disagree on this, but that's the perception of most Biden supporters.

We line up to vote and do what it takes to win the election.
We give small donations , work phone banks and promote voter turn out .

That's a much better use of time and energy , when your goal is WINNING an election.

I wish Biden/Harris well and hope we all behave in a civil, peaceful manner regardless of who wins.

PS/ You won't see any "owning Trumpers" posts from me , if Biden prevails.
I live in this country and want to get along with everyone.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on November 01, 2020, 11:20:31 AM
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/3RJp8XuLEuAZFZVOWnBwIQ--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTk2MDtoPTkzMC43ODU4MjQzNDUxNDY0/https://media-mbst-pub-ue1.s3.amazonaws.com/creatr-uploaded-images/2020-10/8841e740-17d7-11eb-aeff-a5cfa3dea8aa)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on November 01, 2020, 11:58:51 AM
The reason you don't see Biden voters acting like Trumpers, is pretty simple:

1. We don't belong to a cult and don't need our guys name pasted all over our yard , truck or building.

2.  We view most hardcore Trumpers like Trump himself during the 1st debate.
    They're obnoxious, , in-your face and constantly yell insults at you.

Trumpers may disagree on this, but that's the perception of most Biden supporters.

We line up to vote and do what it takes to win the election.
We give small donations , work phone banks and promote voter turn out .

That's a much better use of time and energy , when your goal is WINNING an election.

I wish Biden/Harris well and hope we all behave in a civil, peaceful manner regardless of who wins.

PS/ You won't see any "owning Trumpers" posts from me , if Biden prevails.
I live in this country and want to get along with everyone.

Fuck off, moron.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 01, 2020, 03:21:40 PM


 ;D ;D ;D  good one
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 01, 2020, 03:26:17 PM
Fuck off, moron.
"Walt", I know we disagree on politics , but, the election will be over in 2 days.
Looks like we won't know who won until a few days after Nov 3

Regardless of who wins, I'd hope we can all move on and become more civil to each other.
Stay safe and I wish you, your family and business well.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on November 01, 2020, 05:34:24 PM
Wicked.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Elx0y92XEAAxU79?format=jpg&name=large)

https://twitter.com/GPrime85/status/1323060812496461825/photo/1
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on November 01, 2020, 07:35:22 PM

Howard is looking big there.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Walter Sobchak on November 01, 2020, 10:01:46 PM
"Walt", I know we disagree on politics , but, the election will be over in 2 days.
Looks like we won't know who won until a few days after Nov 3

Regardless of who wins, I'd hope we can all move on and become more civil to each other.
Stay safe and I wish you, your family and business well.

Howard, we disagree on politics because you’re a fucking idiot.

You fucking idiot.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on November 02, 2020, 04:16:24 AM
Experts on both political sides say Biden's corporate tax proposal is 'problematic'

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/why-experts-on-both-political-sides-say-bidens-corporate-tax-proposal-is-problematic-153825021.html

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ejnf-BcXgAALVXQ.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on November 02, 2020, 04:25:02 AM
Why Beijing Hopes for a Biden Win

Biden might have adopted harsh rhetoric against China, but his past actions — and inactions — speak louder than his words. The last time when Biden was in charge, China completed its expansion in the South China Sea. Should Biden get elected this November, Beijing believes that Biden is someone it could do business with and expects him to revise the Trump administration’s hard line policies toward China. The recent revelation of Hunter Biden’s questionable dealings in China shows that Beijing has invested heavily to cultivate a good relationship with the Biden family for decades. A four-year Biden presidency will likely give China’s Xi ample time to fulfill his ambition: putting the final building blocks of a Sino-centric world order, turning China into a technology powerhouse through the completion of the “Made in China 2025” initiative, and possibly taking Taiwan by force.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-beijing-hopes-biden-win-113004870.html

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EkjXisuX0AA_Et2.jpg)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on November 02, 2020, 04:58:28 AM
Bill Garrett predicted that “an ‘excuse’ will be found to prevent any debates.”

Garrett, a former Wilmette resident now living in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, added, “There will be no election. The Democratic cities are in chaos. Riots. Destroyed tax base. Highway shootings. Basic services attacked. They are war zones. By October, these will seem like the good old days.”

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 02, 2020, 04:02:36 PM
Final Predictions? 

I hope we are smart enough not to elect Biden.  I do think Trump will win.  I hope I'm right. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on November 02, 2020, 04:44:52 PM
Experts on both political sides say Biden's corporate tax proposal is 'problematic'

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/why-experts-on-both-political-sides-say-bidens-corporate-tax-proposal-is-problematic-153825021.html

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ejnf-BcXgAALVXQ.jpg)
I am not going to read it, but of course it is a problem.  It will result in people losing jobs, us paying more more for things and companies leaving again, just to name a few.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on November 02, 2020, 08:50:01 PM
Final Predictions? 

I hope we are smart enough not to elect Biden.  I do think Trump will win.  I hope I'm right.

I hope pollsters have learned from 2016 and adjusted f0r the error. If so, Biden wins. If not, Trump wins. I hope you're wrong... :)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Straw Man on November 02, 2020, 09:12:49 PM
Bill Garrett predicted that “an ‘excuse’ will be found to prevent any debates.”

Garrett, a former Wilmette resident now living in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, added, “There will be no election. The Democratic cities are in chaos. Riots. Destroyed tax base. Highway shootings. Basic services attacked. They are war zones. By October, these will seem like the good old days.”


I hope Bill Garrett didn't quite his day job

btw - who the fuck is Bill Garrett
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 02, 2020, 09:53:53 PM
I hope pollsters have learned from 2016 and adjusted f0r the error. If so, Biden wins. If not, Trump wins. I hope you're wrong... :)

They definitely have not learned their lesson.  I was just looking at a number of polls that show Biden with an 11 or 12 point national lead and huge leads in battle ground states.  No way are those polls accurate. 

Regardless of the outcome, predicting some Biden blowout is pretty crazy.  The lack of enthusiasm for Biden and incredible enthusiasm for Trump are at levels that I'm not sure I've ever seen.  The crowds Trump is drawing are off the chain. 

I think if Robert Cahaly and the Trafalagar Group nail tomorrow like they did 2016 they are going to supplant Nate Silver and 538 as the go-to pollsters. 

But we'll know whether the polls are wrong (again) pretty soon. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on November 02, 2020, 10:24:49 PM
They definitely have not learned their lesson.  I was just looking at a number of polls that show Biden with an 11 or 12 point national lead and huge leads in battle ground states.  No way are those polls accurate. 

Regardless of the outcome, predicting some Biden blowout is pretty crazy.  The lack of enthusiasm for Biden and incredible enthusiasm for Trump are at levels that I'm not sure I've ever seen.  The crowds Trump is drawing are off the chain. 

I think if Robert Cahaly and the Trafalagar Group nail tomorrow like they did 2016 they are going to supplant Nate Silver and 538 as the go-to pollsters. 

But we'll know whether the polls are wrong (again) pretty soon.

Just my opinion here, I am not being argumentative, just having a conversation is that the lack of enthusiasm for Biden will be offset by the amount of disgust for Trump. I know several people that were chomping at the bits to get their Biden votes in the day early voting opened, not because they thought Biden was exciting, they just thought Trump was horrible.

Like someone else said, anyone predicating a blowout either way was born after 2016. But at this point I'd rather have Biden leading in most major polls than behind. So I gesso I can't complain. But I'm certainly not thinking its a done deal. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on November 02, 2020, 10:35:59 PM
I hope pollsters have learned from 2016 and adjusted f0r the error. If so, Biden wins. If not, Trump wins. I hope you're wrong... :)

In 2016 Trump won 8% of the black vote (Bush got 8% in 2000).

I predict that Trump wins 18% of the black vote (Bush got 12% in 2004).  That 18% would be nearly 2M more votes.

Polls are predicting that Trump gets 5-6% of the black vote.  Most pollsters are not ready for prime time, but there might be a John Belushi among them.

We'll see.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 02, 2020, 11:15:32 PM
Just my opinion here, I am not being argumentative, just having a conversation is that the lack of enthusiasm for Biden will be offset by the amount of disgust for Trump. I know several people that were chomping at the bits to get their Biden votes in the day early voting opened, not because they thought Biden was exciting, they just thought Trump was horrible.

Like someone else said, anyone predicating a blowout either way was born after 2016. But at this point I'd rather have Biden leading in most major polls than behind. So I gesso I can't complain. But I'm certainly not thinking its a done deal.

Disclaimers aren't really necessary.  This is an opinion board. 

One of the things you might be missing are the millions of voters like me who did not vote for him in 2016 will be voting for him this time around. 

Running against Trump because of "Orange Man Bad" isn't going to carry Joe "Weekend At Bernie's" Biden across the finish line.  Biden is an absolutely terrible candidate.  Keep in mind Democrats rejected him twice already.  They were rejecting him for a third time early this year and only got behind him when they were afraid that Bernie was going to run away with the nomination. 

And I know people vote the top of the ticket, but he picked a horrendous VP.  Kamala Harris was crowned as the frontrunner when the race started.  She got 844 votes before dropping out.  This might be the worst ticket I've ever seen.

Aside from true believers, nobody is excited about Joe Biden. 

Then there is his obvious steep mental decline.  Maybe I'm in denial, but I just don't think people are going to put someone who is clearly having severe cognitive problems in the White House. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on November 03, 2020, 06:55:13 AM
TONE DEAF


"Hey, this is Lady Gaga. I'm voting for America, which means I'm voting for Joe Biden," she opens the video by saying. "And if you live in Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Florida, or Arizona, I encourage you to vote," she continues, in an obvious attempt to drum up support in swing states.

"Cheers to the 2020 election," she says after taking a drink from her beer and then slamming the can on the ground."


(https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/ele.jpg?itok=ZeiJzjIa)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2020, 05:41:49 PM
Final Predictions? 

I hope we are smart enough not to elect Biden.  I do think Trump will win.  I hope I'm right.
Most normal, sane people hope you are right. Be safe, wherever you are. ;)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on November 03, 2020, 05:44:12 PM
Most normal, sane people hope you are right. Be safe, wherever you are. ;)

except the majority of this country isn't sane so.....
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on November 03, 2020, 08:14:09 PM
Disclaimers aren't really necessary.  This is an opinion board. 

One of the things you might be missing are the millions of voters like me who did not vote for him in 2016 will be voting for him this time around. 

Running against Trump because of "Orange Man Bad" isn't going to carry Joe "Weekend At Bernie's" Biden across the finish line.  Biden is an absolutely terrible candidate.  Keep in mind Democrats rejected him twice already.  They were rejecting him for a third time early this year and only got behind him when they were afraid that Bernie was going to run away with the nomination. 

And I know people vote the top of the ticket, but he picked a horrendous VP.  Kamala Harris was crowned as the frontrunner when the race started.  She got 844 votes before dropping out.  This might be the worst ticket I've ever seen.

Aside from true believers, nobody is excited about Joe Biden. 

Then there is his obvious steep mental decline.  Maybe I'm in denial, but I just don't think people are going to put someone who is clearly having severe cognitive problems in the White House.

I would pit any percieved mental decline against an ingrained narcissitic personality any day. but its 11:10 in Florida and its anybody's game here.

edit_ apparently florida went trump
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on November 04, 2020, 06:17:15 PM
I would pit any percieved mental decline against an ingrained narcissitic personality any day. but its 11:10 in Florida and its anybody's game here.

edit_ apparently florida went trump

Darn....do you think it will make any difference when all is said and done?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Agnostic007 on November 04, 2020, 08:03:59 PM
Darn....do you think it will make any difference when all is said and done?


In what sense do you mean. Florida leaning Trump or who is President at the end?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: AbrahamG on November 04, 2020, 08:56:11 PM

In what sense do you mean. Florida leaning Trump or who is President at the end?

I think Texas is more in play going forward than Florida.  Which is a good trade for dems as Texas has more electoral votes. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on November 04, 2020, 10:16:28 PM
woooshhh

(https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/123906904_2425574987739091_4692826164515152932_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=2&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=GGq8IxOHTNgAX_tRvhe&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&oh=1d3956cf0438dfccbbe1ae5ae6b43d91&oe=5FC90E63)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on November 05, 2020, 01:24:54 AM
Jo Jorgensen for the win!!  ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Eldon on November 05, 2020, 01:39:17 AM
William Bradley from Wayne County, Michigan, voted for Joe Biden. William Bradley died in 1984.

118 year old “William Bradley” voted via absentee ballot in Wayne County, Michigan. William Bradley died in 1984.






https://noqreport.com/2020/11/05/william-bradley-from-wayne-county-michigan-voted-for-joe-biden-william-bradley-died-in-1984/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Eldon on November 05, 2020, 03:11:59 AM
Trump Ballots being BURNED!! Twitter removed this video!


&feature=youtu.be
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Body-Buildah on November 05, 2020, 03:56:18 AM
This clever feller would be easy to track/find by GOOG if they really wanted him. But we know GOOG.  ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: loco on November 05, 2020, 04:15:10 AM
Trump Ballots being BURNED!! Twitter removed this video!


&feature=youtu.be

Looks like it's a fake.

https://www.vbgov.com/news/Lists/News%20Releases/Attachments/5046/burning%20sample%20ballot%20evidence.pdf
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on November 05, 2020, 06:09:37 PM
woooshhh

(https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/123906904_2425574987739091_4692826164515152932_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=2&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=GGq8IxOHTNgAX_tRvhe&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&oh=1d3956cf0438dfccbbe1ae5ae6b43d91&oe=5FC90E63)
Can this be real?  They gave Biden this state already?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on November 05, 2020, 06:18:30 PM
Can this be real?  They gave Biden this state already?

It was the screenshot from the count of Michigan when 81/83 reported but AP news/yahoo/MSM all had MORE votes counted for the state of MI , than MI did itself... and those votes according to the MSM were for biden.

Its like somehow the MSM new before the board of elections actually counting the votes..lol

MI has since updated the website to reflect what they were told to put the votes at now
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: jude2 on November 05, 2020, 06:24:17 PM
wow.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 06, 2020, 10:44:35 AM
They definitely have not learned their lesson.  I was just looking at a number of polls that show Biden with an 11 or 12 point national lead and huge leads in battle ground states.  No way are those polls accurate. 

Regardless of the outcome, predicting some Biden blowout is pretty crazy.  The lack of enthusiasm for Biden and incredible enthusiasm for Trump are at levels that I'm not sure I've ever seen.  The crowds Trump is drawing are off the chain. 

I think if Robert Cahaly and the Trafalagar Group nail tomorrow like they did 2016 they are going to supplant Nate Silver and 538 as the go-to pollsters. 

But we'll know whether the polls are wrong (again) pretty soon.

The polls were wrong .
In a deeply divided and diverse electorate it may be impossible for national polls to be accurate .
You were absolutely correct about this being a close race.
Most on my side were too optimistic about the mythical blue landslide.

Biden will eek out a close, hard fought win, but the nation remains as divided as ever.
I'm happy that "Uncle Joe" will win , but I hope he avoids being pushed, too far left.
The country is too divided to generate much congressional consensus for extremes  now.

Perhaps, you can join me in a future , civil political discourse on this forum.

Stay safe ;)

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on November 06, 2020, 02:05:15 PM
woooshhh

(https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/123906904_2425574987739091_4692826164515152932_o.jpg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=2&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=GGq8IxOHTNgAX_tRvhe&_nc_ht=scontent-sea1-1.xx&oh=1d3956cf0438dfccbbe1ae5ae6b43d91&oe=5FC90E63)

Woooshhh!

https://mielections.us/election/results/2020GEN_CENR.html



Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 06, 2020, 11:25:48 PM
This situation is FUBAR.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Board_SHERIF on November 07, 2020, 07:34:05 AM
The polls were wrong .
In a deeply divided and diverse electorate it may be impossible for national polls to be accurate .
You were absolutely correct about this being a close race.
Most on my side were too optimistic about the mythical blue landslide.

Biden will eek out a close, hard fought win, but the nation remains as divided as ever.
I'm happy that "Uncle Joe" will win , but I hope he avoids being pushed, too far left.
The country is too divided to generate much congressional consensus for extremes  now.

Perhaps, you can join me in a future , civil political discourse on this forum.

Stay safe ;)

 "Uncle Joe" ?? I guess you think sniffing/groping young children is funny ??
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on November 07, 2020, 12:33:43 PM
This situation is FUBAR.

Why? Because it didn't go as you thought it would?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: OzmO on November 07, 2020, 01:55:51 PM
Congrats President Harris  ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on November 07, 2020, 02:17:26 PM
Congrats President Harris  ;D

and a well deserved congrats to VP Pelosi
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Option D on November 08, 2020, 10:50:20 AM
Predictions?   Are we even having an election in November?  Will Biden be able to put two complete sentences together during a debate?  Will President Trump be impeached again before November?

I think Biden will win.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Option D on November 08, 2020, 10:50:55 AM
If....IF Biden is actually the nominee and if....IF they have a debate...

Biden will be crushed like we've never seen in modern politics. They will have to enact a mercy rule of sorts and call off the other usual debates, which will involve media calling Trump a bully. But Trump has no choice but to go pedal to the metal on the issues.

Trump is a master of media and TV - so even a remote debate will go terribly for Biden. His speech timing is plain awful even without the TV lag. I just can't imagine him in a debate at this level and he's not going to get better in 5-6 months. That weak Dem primary field was outperforming him.

Covid-19 blackout of politics is the best thing to happen to him. Like Hillary, the less you see him the better you like him.

This didn’t age well.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Option D on November 08, 2020, 10:52:09 AM
Trump Campaign Posts Record-Setting Fundraising Totals for 1st Quarter, Dwarfing Biden's Numbers
By AP Reports
Published April 13, 2020

President Donald Trump’s record-setting fundraising pace slowed slightly amid the coronavirus outbreak but remained strong as he maintains a massive cash advantage over Democrats.

The Trump re-election campaign and the Republican National Committee raised more than $212 million in the first quarter of 2020, according to figures first obtained by The Associated Press, bringing their total to more than $677 million since 2017.

Their haul for March, even as the nation’s economy began grinding to a halt to slow the pandemic, was more than $63 million.

That represented a slowing from the more than $86 million raised in February but nonetheless was Trump’s second-best month ever, and it kept his campaign on pace to maintain its massive fundraising advantage over Democrats.

The pro-Trump effort will report having more than $240 million in the bank at the end of March — $40 million more than two months prior.

The campaign has planned to raise more than $1 billion among itself, the RNC and associated joint fundraising committees.

The fundraising totals come at a pivotal moment for the campaign, both as former Vice President Joe Biden became the presumptive Democratic nominee and as the coronavirus outbreak began to sweep the nation.

“President Trump’s unyielding commitment to the American people has shown time and again that he is the president we need to lead our country through this crisis, and it’s clear that voters are responding to his bold leadership,” RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said.

“The enthusiasm for President Trump and our party remains strong, and we continue to be all systems go toward November,” she said.

Ronna McDaniel

@GOPChairwoman
.@realDonaldTrump’s unyielding commitment to the American people has shown time and again that he is the President we need to lead our country through this crisis.
 
It’s clear that voters are responding to his bold leadership.https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-rnc-raise-212-million-in-first-quarter-amid-impeachment-coronavirus …

Trump campaign, RNC raise $212 million in first quarter amid impeachment, coronavirus
President Trump’s reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee brought in more than $63 million in March, bringing their first-quarter fundraising total to more than $212 million amid...

foxnews.com
6,139
6:02 AM - Apr 13, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
3,018 people are talking about this
Democrats have yet to release their March hauls, but at the end of February, Biden’s campaign and the DNC held just roughly $20 million combined, accounting for debt held by the national party.

“Americans can see President Trump leading this nation through a serious crisis, and they are responding with their continued enthusiastic support for his reelection,” Trump 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale said.

The pandemic has effectively ceased traditional campaigning and fundraising, moving it to digital and other means.

Trump held his last formal fundraiser on March 9 in Florida and his last rally on March 2 in Charlotte, North Carolina, the city scheduled to host the Republican National Convention in late August.

Brad Parscale - Text TRUMP to 88022

@parscale
President @realDonaldTrump’s campaign was built on data & technology so we pivoted to all-virtual better than anyone.

Embedded video
7,508
2:31 AM - Apr 13, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
3,379 people are talking about this
To fill the gap, the Trump campaign has started to host near-daily video streams featuring prominent Trump surrogates and campaign officials and has continued to pepper supporters with digital fundraising requests.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

https://www.westernjournal.com/ap-trumps-fundraising-slows-amid-outbreak-still-sets-records/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=teaparty&utm_campaign=lminetwork&utm_content=2020-04-13&fbclid=IwAR3_sjMeBQK1RF5-3vV9mtHSBBmPVCWak8z7niz2AB5M5_GMlhOW-M66Jx8
Wasn’t enough
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Option D on November 08, 2020, 10:52:41 AM
Before the pandemic I would've bet the bank Trump wins in a landslide.

Now I'll be he wins by about the same margin as 2016.
Na. He loses
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Option D on November 08, 2020, 10:53:33 AM
Joe Rogan On Trump-Biden Matchup: ‘Like Mike Tyson Vs. A 3-Year-Old’


(https://dw-wp-production.imgix.net/2020/03/Joe-Rogan-Joe-Biden-scaled.jpg?auto=format&fit=crop&ixlib=react-8.6.4&h=546&w=970&q=23&dpr=4)


Podcast host Joe Rogan and comedian Brendan Schaub, who used to be an MMA fighter, went off on Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden late last week, saying that President Donald Trump is going to steamroll Biden in the election.

“It shows you how crazy the system is that they wanted him,” Rogan said. “That they wanted Biden to be their guy, that they don’t, they can’t admit that he’s in cognitive decline. I mean it’s very strange.”

“Look if someone wants to ask me questions about things that I understand like MMA or like comedy like if you want to ask me questions about things that I think about and talk about all the time, I could talk to you and really clearly about those things and make a lot of sense,” Rogan continued. “[Biden] can’t do that about politics and he’s been a politician forever … he’s a guy who’s suffering.”

“There’s no way he beats Trump,” Schaub said.

“He doesn’t beat Trump,” Rogan responded.

“No, those two faceoff, Trump’s gonna light him up like a Comedy Central Roast,” Schaub said.

“[Trump’s] already dismissing [Biden],” Rogan said. “He’s gonna destroy him. He’s gonna kill him man. I mean it’s such an easy target, it’s like Mike Tyson versus a three-year-old.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/joe-rogan-on-trump-biden-matchup-like-mike-tyson-vs-a-3-year-old
Ha
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Coach is Back! on November 08, 2020, 10:54:49 AM
Na. He loses

Did I miss something? Was the race called officially yet?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Option D on November 08, 2020, 03:50:50 PM
.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on November 08, 2020, 05:30:03 PM
.

(https://i.ibb.co/qnY00Ns/124435233-10157847060191909-3887864856419236593-n.jpg?fbclid=IwAR3dn3TaztgK5-vDQg-tBbyqadTOseUiiEv5VnzdT2d1LHg2MfbcqhMnCvI)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: chaos on November 08, 2020, 05:49:13 PM
.
Are you looking forward to more 1994 style crime bills from Biden/Harris?
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on November 08, 2020, 07:37:43 PM
This situation is FUBAR.

This coming week might be more entreating than election night:

Start with Pennsylvania.  Biden, as of this writing, is at 290 electoral votes.  Pennsylvania is 20.

I read the Justice Alito opinion, and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason.  Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court, and they know it.  Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules.   A new arrival, Justice Barrett, says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution.  OK, wanna bet she does?

Remove the after 8:00 P.M. ballots, and Biden loses Pennsylvania.  Biden 270.

Let's visit Nevada.  I have lots of friends in California who have condos in Nevada to evade state taxes.  There are not a couple of people doing this; there are tens of thousands.  Everyone knows it, and California seeks them out.

Our old pal Harry Reid knows it as well, and he apparently has them voting in droves in this election.  Probably not a big D.J. constituency.  Within 72 hours of the election, the Trump team found, validated over 3,500 of them.  I do not suspect that Trump's people stopped counting.

Every one of these is a ballot reduction for Biden

Nevada, as of now, is well within reach for DJ and the Trump team — particularly when the California crowd is reduced.  And a few of them may testify since a false vote is a very bad thing, with jail time if convicted.  Maybe a bigger story here.

Remember where we are, people.  Biden is at 270 after a highly probable Supreme Court decision (read Alito and concurring opinions).

Lose Nevada, lose the election.

But wait: it gets better.

Let's visit Wisconsin.  Right now, it is 20,000 votes in Uncle Joe's direction.  Lots of stories out there, well below the Google fold, that there are way more Wisconsin votes than there are registered voters.  OK, maybe the dead can vote up there — probably a Midwest thing.

Well, last night, we found that Wisconsin election clerks were told, and followed the direction, to modify mail-in ballots and fill in the blanks where witnesses left out critical info.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/wait_just_a_minute_some_very_good_news_may_be_coming.html
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 09, 2020, 08:00:31 PM
Why? Because it didn't go as you thought it would?

Yeah that's it.   ::)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 09, 2020, 08:01:18 PM
Congrats President Harris  ;D

Pretty much.  lol   :D

I doubt he finishes his term, if he is actually elected. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 09, 2020, 08:02:08 PM
Did I miss something? Was the race called officially yet?

Didn't you hear?  The media called it.  Isn't that our constitutional process?   :)
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 09, 2020, 08:06:14 PM
This coming week might be more entreating than election night:

Start with Pennsylvania.  Biden, as of this writing, is at 290 electoral votes.  Pennsylvania is 20.

I read the Justice Alito opinion, and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason.  Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court, and they know it.  Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules.   A new arrival, Justice Barrett, says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution.  OK, wanna bet she does?

Remove the after 8:00 P.M. ballots, and Biden loses Pennsylvania.  Biden 270.

Let's visit Nevada.  I have lots of friends in California who have condos in Nevada to evade state taxes.  There are not a couple of people doing this; there are tens of thousands.  Everyone knows it, and California seeks them out.

Our old pal Harry Reid knows it as well, and he apparently has them voting in droves in this election.  Probably not a big D.J. constituency.  Within 72 hours of the election, the Trump team found, validated over 3,500 of them.  I do not suspect that Trump's people stopped counting.

Every one of these is a ballot reduction for Biden

Nevada, as of now, is well within reach for DJ and the Trump team — particularly when the California crowd is reduced.  And a few of them may testify since a false vote is a very bad thing, with jail time if convicted.  Maybe a bigger story here.

Remember where we are, people.  Biden is at 270 after a highly probable Supreme Court decision (read Alito and concurring opinions).

Lose Nevada, lose the election.

But wait: it gets better.

Let's visit Wisconsin.  Right now, it is 20,000 votes in Uncle Joe's direction.  Lots of stories out there, well below the Google fold, that there are way more Wisconsin votes than there are registered voters.  OK, maybe the dead can vote up there — probably a Midwest thing.

Well, last night, we found that Wisconsin election clerks were told, and followed the direction, to modify mail-in ballots and fill in the blanks where witnesses left out critical info.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/wait_just_a_minute_some_very_good_news_may_be_coming.html

Honestly I don't really trust American Thinker articles.  I haven't found them to be reliable all the time. 

In any event, I want to see how this plays out.  There is definitely evidence of fraud and statistical improbabilities (like 95 percent voter turnout, etc.).  Whether that is enough to change the outcome remains to be seen. 

I think Trump should do exactly what Bush and Gore did in 2000 and make whatever his cases might be in various states.  If it turns out he lost fairly he should concede.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: TheGrinch on November 10, 2020, 10:48:35 AM
Contingent Election coming to a country near you in January..

Get the popcorn ready


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingent_election

In the United States, a contingent election is the procedure used to elect the President or Vice President in the event that no candidate for one or both of these offices wins an absolute majority of votes in the Electoral College. A presidential contingent election is decided by a special vote of the United States House of Representatives, while a vice-presidential contingent election is decided by a vote of the United States Senate. During a contingent election in the House, each state's delegation casts one en bloc vote to determine the president, rather than a vote from each representative. Senators, on the other hand, cast votes individually for vice president.

The contingent election process was originally established in Article Two, Section 1, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. The procedure was modified by the 12th Amendment in 1804, under which the House chooses one of the three candidates who received the most electoral votes, while the Senate chooses one of the two candidates who received the most electoral votes. The phrase "contingent election" is not found in the text of the Constitution itself, but has been used to describe this procedure since at least 1823.[1]

Contingent elections have occurred only three times in American history: in 1801, 1825, and 1837. In 1800, Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, the presidential and vice-presidential nominees on the ticket of the Democratic-Republican party, received the same number of electoral votes. Under the procedures in place at the time, this necessitated a contingent election the following year to decide which would be President and which Vice President. In 1824, the Electoral College was split between four candidates, with Andrew Jackson losing the subsequent contingent election to John Quincy Adams, despite having won a plurality of both the popular and electoral vote. In 1836, faithless electors in Virginia refused to vote for Martin Van Buren's vice-presidential nominee Richard Mentor Johnson, denying him a majority of the electoral vote and forcing the Senate to elect him in a contingent election.

The three past contingent elections were held by the outgoing Congress, since, at the time, congressional terms ended / began on March 4, the same day as presidential terms. In 1933, the 20th Amendment moved the congressional term end / start date to an earlier date in the year than the new January 20 presidential term end / start date. As a result, any future contingent election will be held by the incoming congress.

Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 10, 2020, 11:15:02 AM
Honestly I don't really trust American Thinker articles.  I haven't found them to be reliable all the time. 

In any event, I want to see how this plays out.  There is definitely evidence of fraud and statistical improbabilities (like 95 percent voter turnout, etc.).  Whether that is enough to change the outcome remains to be seen. 

I think Trump should do exactly what Bush and Gore did in 2000 and make whatever his cases might be in various states.  If it turns out he lost fairly he should concede.

Thanks for the reasonable post.  ;)

The main problem with these fraud allegations is the number of potential votes it could change.
For example, Sen "Lilly" Graham is saying  dead people voted in the 2020.
He claims, that Pa could have 6 provable cases of this. I suspect a few folks die in the weeks BEFORE the election
and the registrar fails to update the info.

Ok, even IF "dead people voting is  100% true, it throws out 6 ballots.

The one law suit the GOP won, allowed poll watchers to move from 10 ft to 6 ft during the ballot counting in PA.

The 2000 election in FL came down to Bush being 537 votes ahead after the 2nd recount.
In 2016 , Trump won Michigan by 10,000 and votes and in 2020 Ga it's around 14,000 for Biden.

The bottom line is , Trump has no viable path left to win .
In my OPINION, the republicans need to focus on the Ga senate run offs which determines senate control in 2021.


Stay safe
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 11, 2020, 05:03:39 PM
Interesting article.  A lot of the allegations regarding the 2020 election fall into these categories.  For example, for anyone who follows voter turnout in the U.S., you know it is abysmal.  We really suck at voter turnout.  It's why relatively small voting blocs can control smaller elections.  But I just read this about Wisconsin:  "The state is 92% total turnout. The 5 counties are Washington at 96.6%, St. Croix at 96%(95.99%), Dane at 90.38%, Waukesha at 94.56% and, Ozaukee at 94.96%." 

I haven't verified, but this would likely be the highest turnout in American history for a statewide presidential election.  Here is what the article says about turnout:

"Watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway.
You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't.
Voting is compulsory in Gabon, but it is not enforced; even in Australia where it is enforced, where you can vote by post or online and can be fined for not voting, turnout only reaches 90-95%."

This doesn't prove fraud, but I'm definitely interested in a fact-based, reasonable explanation. 

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs
Published 2 September 2016
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on November 11, 2020, 06:52:51 PM
Interesting article.  A lot of the allegations regarding the 2020 election fall into these categories.  For example, for anyone who follows voter turnout in the U.S., you know it is abysmal.  We really suck at voter turnout.  It's why relatively small voting blocs can control smaller elections.  But I just read this about Wisconsin:  "The state is 92% total turnout. The 5 counties are Washington at 96.6%, St. Croix at 96%(95.99%), Dane at 90.38%, Waukesha at 94.56% and, Ozaukee at 94.96%." 

I haven't verified, but this would likely be the highest turnout in American history for a statewide presidential election.  Here is what the article says about turnout:

"Watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway.
You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't.
Voting is compulsory in Gabon, but it is not enforced; even in Australia where it is enforced, where you can vote by post or online and can be fined for not voting, turnout only reaches 90-95%."

This doesn't prove fraud, but I'm definitely interested in a fact-based, reasonable explanation. 

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs
Published 2 September 2016
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

Good piece.

In 2014 or so, cops in Tennessee issued 30,000 tickets for failure to wear a seatbelt.  The next year they issued 100,000. 
Folks weren’t being more careless, it’s just that cops started cracking down.  I think that if we investigated voter fraud we’d
find a lot of it.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 11, 2020, 07:06:00 PM
Good piece.

In 2014 or so, cops in Tennessee issued 30,000 tickets for failure to wear a seatbelt.  The next year they issued 100,000. 
Folks weren’t being more careless, it’s just that cops started cracking down.  I think that if we investigated voter fraud we’d
find a lot of it.

True.  I didn't realize how rampant it is until this election.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 12, 2020, 08:13:02 AM
Interesting article.  A lot of the allegations regarding the 2020 election fall into these categories.  For example, for anyone who follows voter turnout in the U.S., you know it is abysmal.  We really suck at voter turnout.  It's why relatively small voting blocs can control smaller elections.  But I just read this about Wisconsin:  "The state is 92% total turnout. The 5 counties are Washington at 96.6%, St. Croix at 96%(95.99%), Dane at 90.38%, Waukesha at 94.56% and, Ozaukee at 94.96%." 

I haven't verified, but this would likely be the highest turnout in American history for a statewide presidential election.  Here is what the article says about turnout:

"Watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway.
You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't.
Voting is compulsory in Gabon, but it is not enforced; even in Australia where it is enforced, where you can vote by post or online and can be fined for not voting, turnout only reaches 90-95%."

This doesn't prove fraud, but I'm definitely interested in a fact-based, reasonable explanation. 

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs
Published 2 September 2016
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-37243190

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/voter-turnout-by-state

Wisc2020 voter turn out, was 69.5% , Minn was the highest at 74% and Hawaii the lowest at 42%
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: SOMEPARTS on November 12, 2020, 10:16:27 AM
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/voter-turnout-by-state

Wisc2020 voter turn out, was 69.5% , Minn was the highest at 74% and Hawaii the lowest at 42%


Statewide...great, now go in the big blue city counties that couldn't manage to count in one night.....Detroit 92%. DUH
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 12, 2020, 11:37:22 AM
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/voter-turnout-by-state

Wisc2020 voter turn out, was 69.5% , Minn was the highest at 74% and Hawaii the lowest at 42%

Every single time I actually read something you post it contains false or misleading information. 

"The number of ballots cast translates into a turnout of 69.6%. That’s based off a total of 832,466 registered voters across the state."

https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2020/11/04/hawaiis-general-election-voter-turnout-was-best-its-been-since/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on November 12, 2020, 12:26:24 PM
State voter turnout not quite a record

By Chris Mertes spedit@hngnews.com Nov 10, 2020

(https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/hngnews.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/c/89/c89485ba-50ce-5e23-944b-10c793a53aa8/5fa9a256aac5e.image.jpg?resize=881%2C395)


Unofficially, Wisconsin’s voters cast 3,296,374 votes cast for president, the most ever in Wisconsin, smashing the record of 3,071,434 in 2012.

The unofficial turnout percentage of Wisconsin’s 4,536,417 voting age population was 72.67%, which was not quite a record. The 2004 presidential election remains the high-water mark in terms of percentage turnout, because the voting age population was significantly lower.

So far (nationally) 148 million votes have been tallied, with Democrat Joe Biden winning more than 75 million — the highest number for a presidential candidate in history. Trump received more than 70 million — the highest total for a losing candidate.

An Associated Press analysis shows that some of the biggest turnout increases to date occurred in states that liberalized their mail-voting rules.

Many of the states with the biggest turnout increases — including Arizona, Texas and Georgia — were new battlegrounds in the presidential race, places where Democrats sought to mobilize new voters and shift Republican strongholds. Some analysts noted the number proved the efficacy of voter outreach and organization efforts.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 13, 2020, 12:59:09 PM
Every single time I actually read something you post it contains false or misleading information. 

"The number of ballots cast translates into a turnout of 69.6%. That’s based off a total of 832,466 registered voters across the state."

https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2020/11/04/hawaiis-general-election-voter-turnout-was-best-its-been-since/

In the source I posted , the chart * was based on the % of ELIGIBLE voters , NOT registered voters. 
* It's a population data site, NOT a political site

For whatever reason many people who are eligible to vote don't even try .
To me , that statistic is more reflective of the population, but I can see your point in terms of politics.
On a related point, lots of pre-election polls used samples of "likely voters" , which may be subjective.

I think we can BOTH agree that not bothering to vote is pretty pathetic.

In "get big" speak, it's like having 10 guys at a Vegas pool party all scoping the babes.
Let's say, one is a total homo and another is Shizzo, so only 8 dudes or 80% are eligible. :D
Of the 8 eligible only 6 try to meet a girl and 2 hook up:

2/8 = 25% of "eligible" get biggers hook up
 or
2/6 = 33% of "playa" get biggers hook up

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 13, 2020, 09:44:47 PM
In the source I posted , the chart * was based on the % of ELIGIBLE voters , NOT registered voters. 
* It's a population data site, NOT a political site

For whatever reason many people who are eligible to vote don't even try .
To me , that statistic is more reflective of the population, but I can see your point in terms of politics.
On a related point, lots of pre-election polls used samples of "likely voters" , which may be subjective.

I think we can BOTH agree that not bothering to vote is pretty pathetic.

In "get big" speak, it's like having 10 guys at a Vegas pool party all scoping the babes.
Let's say, one is a total homo and another is Shizzo, so only 8 dudes or 80% are eligible. :D
Of the 8 eligible only 6 try to meet a girl and 2 hook up:

2/8 = 25% of "eligible" get biggers hook up
 or
2/6 = 33% of "playa" get biggers hook up

 ;D ;D ;D

Blah blah blah.  You're just dishonest. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Howard on November 17, 2020, 10:15:20 AM
Blah blah blah.  You're just dishonest.

You're welcome to your opinion, but, I was sincere in my reply on this.

Stay safe my friend and let's hope for a better year in 2021.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Dos Equis on November 17, 2020, 10:39:47 AM
You're welcome to your opinion, but, I was sincere in my reply on this.

Stay safe my friend and let's hope for a better year in 2021.

My opinion is based on the numerous false statements you post on the board. 

Stay safe and let's hope you start telling the truth in 2021. 
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Moontrane on November 26, 2020, 08:16:12 PM
5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms

Even more unbelievably, Biden is on his way to winning the White House after having lost almost every historic bellwether county across the country. The Wall Street Journal and The Epoch Times independently analyzed the results of 19 counties around the United States that have nearly perfect presidential voting records over the last 40 years. President Trump won every single bellwether county, except Clallam County in Washington.

Whereas the former VP picked up Clallam by about three points, President Trump’s margin of victory in the other 18 counties averaged over 16 points. In a larger list of 58 bellwether counties that have correctly picked the president since 2000, Trump won 51 of them by an average of 15 points, while the other seven went to Biden by around four points. Bellwether counties overwhelmingly chose President Trump, but Biden found a path to victory anyway.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/23/5-more-ways-joe-biden-magically-outperformed-election-norms/
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Palumboism on November 27, 2020, 11:37:17 AM

Statewide...great, now go in the big blue city counties that couldn't manage to count in one night.....Detroit 92%. DUH

Anyone who's ever been to Detroit knows that number is bogus.
Title: Re: Trump v. Biden 2020
Post by: Primemuscle on December 01, 2020, 01:47:15 PM
 
BREAKING NEWS
William Barr said that the Justice Department hasn’t uncovered voting fraud at a scale that could have changed the results of the 2020 election.

Tuesday, December 1, 2020 2:47 PM EST
Mr. Barr’s comments, in an interview with The Associated Press, were a prominent repudiation of President Trump’s baseless assertions and came days after the president implied that the Justice Department and the F.B.I. may have played a role in an election fraud.

Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, who has refused to recognize Mr. Trump’s election loss, on Tuesday also moved closer to overtly accepting the reality that Joe Biden would be in the White House next year, while discussing the prospects for more pandemic stimulus in 2021.