Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: obsidian on December 08, 2020, 10:38:33 PM
-
https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/rkansas-alabama-florida-kentucky-mississippi-south-carolina-south-dakota-announce-joined-texas-election-fraud-lawsuit-on-scotus-docket.html/
This is not over!
THIS is the case. The one to watch.
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution
Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors.
Louisiana AG statement: "Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution…[T]he U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments."
— Jeff Ling, esq. (@JeffLingESQ) December 8, 2020
Supreme Court Adds Texas Election Fraud Lawsuit Against GA, MI, PA, WI to the Docket And Rejects GOP Pennsylvania Lawsuit
🚨 Update: Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, & South Dakota have all announced that they will be joining Texas in the suit. https://t.co/MtuC0AXEh5
— Jess 🇺🇸 (@jessiprincey) December 8, 2020
Attorney General Jeff Landry’s Statement on 2020 Federal Elections and Recent Texas Motion Before the Supreme Court
Louisiana Dept of Justice, December 8, 2020:
BATON ROUGE, LA – Attorney General Jeff Landry issued the following statement regarding the ongoing controversies over the 2020 federal election and the new motion put forward by the State of Texas before the U.S. Supreme Court:
“Millions of Louisiana citizens, and tens of millions of our fellow citizens in the country, have deep concerns regarding the conduct of the 2020 federal elections. Deeply rooted in these concerns is the fact that some states appear to have conducted their elections with a disregard to the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, many Louisianans have become more frustrated as some in media and the political class try to sidestep legitimate issues for the sake of expediency."
Joining the TEXAS Lawsuit against PA, WI, MI and GA:
ALABAMA!
ARKANSAS!
FLORIDA!
KENTUCKY!
LOUISIANA!
MISSISSIPPI!
SOUTH CAROLINA!
SOUTH DAKOTA!
Wow! Still room for more! Come join us! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
— Cari Kelemen (@KelemenCari) December 8, 2020
Weeks ago, on behalf of the citizens of Louisiana, my office joined many other states in filing a legal brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the Justices to look into the conduct of the election in Pennsylvania where their state court ignored the U.S. Constitution in regard to the conduct of the election. The U.S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 4, states plainly: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature …” The power for the conduct of federal elections is held by the State Legislatures in each state. In states like Pennsylvania, the judicial branch attempted to seize control of these duties and obligations and to set their own rules. These actions appear to be unconstitutional. If it is unconstitutional for Pennsylvania to take this action, it is similarly unconstitutional for other states to have done the same.
Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined representing the citizens of Louisiana.
Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.
Louisiana citizens are damaged if elections in other states were conducted outside the confines of the Constitution while we obeyed the rules.”
-
yes... it is over. What makes this lawsuit any different from the state lawsuits that failed other than Texas has no standing in the case?
-
yes... it is over. What makes this lawsuit any different from the state lawsuits that failed other than Texas has no standing in the case?
They are bypassing the corrupt judges in the swing states and taking it to the Supreme Court. The election fraud in the swing states goes right to the top. So of course they'll have bought and paid for judges to block any lawsuits.
-
They are bypassing the corrupt judges in the swing states and taking it to the Supreme Court. The election fraud in the swing states goes right to the top. So of course they'll have bought and paid for judges to block any lawsuits.
I've heard that from Trumpsters that every judge that ruled against trump was corrupt, even the Republican ones. Now that the SCOTUS shot down the Pennsylvania lawsuit with one sentence, I'm almost certain the Trumpsters will conclude the evidence of fraud isnt lacking but the majority conservative SCOTUS must be corrupt. It's an illness I guess
-
Despite what they say, the libleft cucktards of Getbig are sweating.
And so they should.
The scope of the corruption in the election continues to grow.
That water is coming to a boil, folks.
-
Despite what they say, the libleft cucktards of Getbig are sweating.
And so they should.
The scope of the corruption in the election continues to grow.
That water is coming to a boil, folks.
I'm the one who was willing to put up Money that the election results stand the scrutiny of courts and election officials both Republican and Democratic and not a single Trump supporter answered the call. I don't think we are sweating at all. We are literally watching every avenue the Trumpster had to challenge the election shot down one by one.
PS... yesterday was Safe Harbor day.
-
When the SC doesn't overturn anything or even agree to hear anything... what's the excuse going to be? Crybabies already blaming corrupt judges on the other courts. ::) Can't wait to see how they comfort themselves when it doesn't pan out elsewhere.
-
I'm the one who was willing to put up Money that the election results stand the scrutiny of courts and election officials both Republican and Democratic and not a single Trump supporter answered the call. I don't think we are sweating at all. We are literally watching every avenue the Trumpster had to challenge the election shot down one by one.
PS... yesterday was Safe Harbor day.
Been asking you about your whopping 200 dollar bet in multiple threads
You haven’t answered
You ready?
-
I'm the one who was willing to put up Money that the election results stand the scrutiny of courts and election officials both Republican and Democratic and not a single Trump supporter answered the call. I don't think we are sweating at all. We are literally watching every avenue the Trumpster had to challenge the election shot down one by one.
PS... yesterday was Safe Harbor day.
Put up money? You are not even willing to post under your main account bitch. You’re a lame gimmick, you’ve always have been worthless
Anyone heard from Dearth or JAGO lately ?
-
This lawsuit doesn’t list voter fraud/illegal ballots or tampering? Isn’t that what we are being told took place?
-
When the SC doesn't overturn anything or even agree to hear anything... what's the excuse going to be? Crybabies already blaming corrupt judges on the other courts. ::) Can't wait to see how they comfort themselves when it doesn't pan out elsewhere.
You mean cry by trying to overthrow a duly elected president with non-stop lies, investigations that started before he won, “Russian collusion” and every other so call smoking gun that backfired in their faces along with a fake impeachment and the someone who cried for four years claiming she should have been President..... you mean those crybabies?
-
You mean cry by trying to overthrow a duly elected president with non-stop lies,
You mean like crying to try to overthrow a duly elected president with non-stop lies like a fake birth certificate? BIRTHER!
You cry more than anyone else. Now you do nothing but drag any little dreg of hope from somewhere else over here to try to pass off as the next "hope" and sure fire way that Trump will be reelected. What a dumb piss ant you are.
-
You mean like crying to try to overthrow a duly elected president with non-stop lies like a fake birth certificate? BIRTHER!
You cry more than anyone else. Now you do nothing but drag any little dreg of hope from somewhere else over here to try to pass off as the next "hope" and sure fire way that Trump will be reelected. What a dumb piss ant you are.
Lurker did you ever hear of Obama before he he ran for president?
-
?
Video: https://twitter.com/UncleGulag/status/1336531504869076993 (https://twitter.com/UncleGulag/status/1336531504869076993)
-
Lurker did you ever hear of Obama before he he ran for president?
Yes. As a Senator.
-
?
Video: https://twitter.com/UncleGulag/status/1336531504869076993 (https://twitter.com/UncleGulag/status/1336531504869076993)
This leftist politician doesn't seem anywhere nearly as confident of the election results as leftists on this forum.
-
this is nothing more than an attempt from the Texas AG to suck up to Trump in hopes of receiving a pardon
He may get a pardon but this lawsuit is just as dumb as anything that Rudy tried (and failed)
You didn't know the the Texas AG was criminally indicted 5 years ago ???
check out his mug shot below
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/12/ken-paxton-texas-lawsuit-scotus-election-pardon.html
https://www.texastribune.org/2019/06/19/ken-paxton-criminal-case-timeline-texas-attorney-general-fraud/
-
17 states so far have joined the lawsuit
-
I've heard that from Trumpsters that every judge that ruled against trump was corrupt, even the Republican ones. Now that the SCOTUS shot down the Pennsylvania lawsuit with one sentence, I'm almost certain the Trumpsters will conclude the evidence of fraud isnt lacking but the majority conservative SCOTUS must be corrupt. It's an illness I guess
That doesn't sound corrupt at all. Like when Primemuscle said that one Democrat judge said that the arguments of Trump's legal team were like "Frankenstein's Monster" in legal terms.
Thank goodness we have such brilliant justices on the job.
-
You mean cry by trying to overthrow a duly elected president with non-stop lies, investigations that started before he won, “Russian collusion” and every other so call smoking gun that backfired in their faces along with a fake impeachment and the someone who cried for four years claiming she should have been President..... you mean those crybabies?
-
Coach is the male version of Melissa Carone. Uncanny parallels and reality disconnect.
-
Coach is the male version of Melissa Carone. Uncanny parallels and reality disconnect.
I can't disagree. Although I like Coach, I'd never fuck the shit out of him. Cannot say the same for Ms. Carone.
;D
-
100% SCOTUS won't even hear it imo
-
100% SCOTUS won't even hear it imo
True dat!
-
None of Texas’ business!! And that will be what the Supreme Court will say one way or another. If the shoe were on the other foot, and New York or Illinois or California decided to dick around with the internal affairs of Texas, you’d here Texans screaming and squawking from one end of the Lone Star State to the other. Texas is a great place by the way, but as for their legislature, well.....
-
I'm the one who was willing to put up Money that the election results stand the scrutiny of courts and election officials both Republican and Democratic and not a single Trump supporter answered the call. I don't think we are sweating at all. We are literally watching every avenue the Trumpster had to challenge the election shot down one by one.
PS... yesterday was Safe Harbor day.
Except you aren’t willing to put up money
I’m ready your hiding like a biaaaaasaaatttchhh
-
Been asking you about your whopping 200 dollar bet in multiple threads
You haven’t answered
You ready?
I actually thought you were taunting all the Trumpsters who won't put their money where their mouth is like Coach. You want to bet? Name the amount and the criteria
-
17 states so far have joined the lawsuit
The states didn't join...just their A.G's. This will be laughed out of court but at this point, its quite embarrassing
-
The states didn't join...just their A.G's. This will be laughed out of court but at this point, its quite embarrassing
funny, Texas is all about states rights, then files a lawsuit because another state held an election in a way Ken Paxton didn't like. Hypocrisy 101
-
funny, Texas is all about states rights, then files a lawsuit because another state held an election in a way Ken Paxton didn't like. Hypocrisy 101
Ive already texted my sister in law in Texas and told her that Texas can’t get upset from now on if others try to tell them how to run Texas.
She lost it.
She also just had a huge birthday party for her kid, and I’m sure she would not be too upset of her parents died and let her a bunch of money that would otherwise go to their care as they age.
-
funny, Texas is all about states rights, then files a lawsuit because another state held an election in a way Ken Paxton didn't like. Hypocrisy 101
Can you like, .... not point out the obvious? It confuses the mental plebs.
-
I actually thought you were taunting all the Trumpsters who won't put their money where their mouth is like Coach. You want to bet? Name the amount and the criteria
We already did num nuts
200
-
The states didn't join...just their A.G's. This will be laughed out of court but at this point, its quite embarrassing
Not quite as embarrassing as a fatso preaching Nutrition advice or economic plans based on it
-
Not quite as embarrassing as a fatso preaching Nutrition advice or economic plans based on it
No, embarrassing all the way around. And states going against other states is plain weird. Wonder whether the Supreme Court will even look at it. Wonder how the Texas Attorney General will argue that he had personal detailed information on what occurred in those states. Be interesting to hear his specific answers. Total jerk.
-
It doesn’t make sense because your not focused on getting rid of corruption
Swamp is being drained
-
It doesn’t make sense because your not focused on getting rid of corruption
Swamp is being drained
The Texas Attorney General is about as far from being a swamp drainer as you can get. Aren’t the FBI or other agencies investigating him for corruption? Oh, maybe that investigation can be called off or he can be pardoned by that man of utmost integrity on his way back to Mar-A-Lago?
-
The Texas Attorney General is about as far from being a swamp drainer as you can get. Aren’t the FBI or other agencies investigating him for corruption? Oh, maybe that investigation can be called off or he can be pardoned by that man of utmost integrity on his way back to Mar-A-Lago?
He's doing lip service and ass kissing for one of those pardons that Trumpy is sending out with Christmas cards.
-
That doesn't sound corrupt at all. Like when Primemuscle said that one Democrat judge said that the arguments of Trump's legal team were like "Frankenstein's Monster" in legal terms.
Thank goodness we have such brilliant justices on the job.
The state of Texas has no standing to bring this voter law suit against any other state due to :
a. The 10th amendment and b. electoral college that uses 50 separate state elections.
The recent team Trump election fraud lawsuit from Penn was rejected by a single line denial by SCOTUS.
Conclusion - baseless law suit going nowhere. However, the Texas AG may use this to help get him a Trump pardon.
Plus, the other state AG's and Ted Cruz want to use it as means to fund raise and gain favor with the Trump base.
-
The states didn't join...just their A.G's. This will be laughed out of court but at this point, its quite embarrassing
That's correct, but since the state AG is the top law enforcement official in each state, they represent the overall legal concerns in their state. The hope was that if you brought a state vs state law suit , the court of origin would be the supreme Ct.
The main problems with THAT is each state runs their own elections for President via the electoral college.
Texas can't interfere with any other state's election.
-
The state of Texas has no standing to bring this voter law suit against any other state due to :
a. The 10th amendment and b. electoral college that uses 50 separate state elections.
The recent team Trump election fraud lawsuit from Penn was rejected by a single line denial by SCOTUS.
Conclusion - baseless law suit going nowhere. However, the Texas AG may use this to help get him a Trump pardon.
Plus, the other state AG's and Ted Cruz want to use it as means to fund raise and gain favor with the Trump base.
Not only that. What is the specific evidence that Texas would be privy to that he would present? I would like to see Ted Cruz’ Power Points and detailed attachments that he will be presenting in Court. Ted is most likely really hoping this will go nowhere, so he can look like a hero but not be out on a completely flimsy wing. This whole thing has infuriated me more than anything else (which has mostly rolled off my back) and I have communicated to my Texas friends (including a Trump voter or two) to MIND THEIR OWN F.....ING BUSINESS!
-
The states didn't join...just their A.G's. This will be laughed out of court but at this point, its quite embarrassing
lol - sure Vince G, CSN, MFT, Esq, Lawyer in Training
-
That's correct, but since the state AG is the top law enforcement official in each state, they represent the overall legal concerns in their state. The hope was that if you brought a state vs state law suit , the court of origin would be the supreme Ct.
The main problems with THAT is each state runs their own elections for President via the electoral college.
Texas can't interfere with any other state's election.
Jesus Howard- just admit you don't know shit and go back to your fart jokes. At least then you were an expert, lol
-
Only 18 states not 22 and SCOTUS won't even hear the case
PEDO for POTUS!!
-
Only 18 states not 22 and SCOTUS won't even hear the case
PEDO for POTUS!!
*throws up hands*
Now what??
-
Jesus Howard- just admit you don't know shit and go back to your fart jokes. At least then you were an expert, lol
Ok? So what's your constitutional legal basis for saying Texas can?
-
Only 18 states not 22 and SCOTUS won't even hear the case
PEDO for POTUS!!
It's a kinda key legal concept called "standing" that's required to move the law suit into court.
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/standing
This "law suit" is just a PR stunt for the rabid Trumpers to get excited out and send money to various republican PACS
-
This "law suit" is just a PR stunt for the rabid Trumpers to get excited out and send money to various republican PACS
This. And it seems to be working like a charm. The trumpturds funding this legal action will have the same outcome as those that funded the wall. NOTHING.
-
Ok? So what's your constitutional legal basis for saying Texas can?
It is true that the Supreme Court is designated in the Constitution as arbiter of disputes between states. It’s just that the dispute is totally unclear here. What possible information would the Attorney General of Texas possess on election issues in specific counties in Michigan or Wisconsin, for example? That is where I can’t wait to hear Ted Cruz’ presentation.