Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: WeightPSHR on January 26, 2021, 07:15:35 AM
-
Here we go...
https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/26/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-banned-from-twitter/
-
Here we go...
https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/26/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-banned-from-twitter/
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
-
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
The first problem with you is that you find fucking "dirty". The second problem is that you want freedom while being a biggot. The third problem is that if you want what you say you want, you cannot look at the world through a $$$ colored glasses....
-
The first problem with you is that you find fucking "dirty". The second problem is that you want freedom while being a biggot. The third problem is that if you want what you say you want, you cannot look at the world through a $$$ colored glasses....
Yes OMR is a bigot..... ::) get a clue
-
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
Well said and that's exactly what is happening. Big Tech has always been a wolf in sheeps clothing.
-
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
ZBig approved.
-
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
I believe it´s called cherry picking. yes 100% spot on.
-
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
Link to said porn please ;D :P
-
What I am starting to see is more of an inception towards a technocracy. These elitists in control of these media companies know that while they can't impinge upon your 1st & 4th amendment rights outside in the real world, they can impinge upon all of your rights when you engage in the use of their products and services. Just as any private company has a legal right to refuse to provide you their products and services, these tech companies have banded together to enforce a work-around of our constitutional rights. They know very well that our founding fathers had no foresight towards the future and its technological developments, so now they are showing the American people that there's always a way to get around these pesky things we assume as rights (rightfully should be called privileges).
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
[1] None of what you say applies to monopolies, and Big Tech is approaching monopolistic power on the provision of social media. Especially when these scumbags explicitly violate their contract in taking Parker offline, by not giving them 30 days notice. They didn't even give them 30 hours notice.
[2] The private business argument. Uh huh. Except when forcing Christian bakers to bake a cake for a homosexual wedding, while ignoring Muslim bakers who do the same thing.
I've found a personal solution to this:
I'm not meeting any new Jews from now on, as they are the group most responsible for pushing this bullshit. People of colour have no power, and so they never did anything bad to me - they were just the pets of Jews and White liberals.
But they are liabilities, and I refuse to play this stupid game of me being forced to bake a gay cake for a Jewish gay couple, when the reverse would NEVER FUCKING HAPPEN - EVER.
In Canada, marriage laws didn't even begin to be fair to men until 2007. Can you believe that? Yet I was chronically told men were the oppressors. Now in 2021, Canada uses a 50/50 yardstick approach to dividing up assets and so on. But this ONLY started 13-14 years ago.
Non-Whites had a great scam in North America - they got to claim oppression while Whites were sucking their dicks, forced into it by Jews.
No more.
At this point, everyone notices the volume of anti-male and anti-White discrimination in our culture. The current system will not hold up. Kirstie Alley had 80K Twitter followers removed, FFS, LOL. Only now that it's impacting over 50% of the White population directly, does everyone acknowledge it.
In fairness, I was talking about this since 2007. I was only met with scorn. But I was never wrong.
-
amazing how many getbiggers are outraged at a private company being forced to bake cakes for queers yet have no problem with private companies banning incitement to violence
you seem to be arguing that incitement to violence is not as serious a problem as copulating
You actually believe the millions of people being dropped were all inciting violence? You probably watch CNN a lot, don't you?
-
Here we go...
https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/26/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-banned-from-twitter/
You and ALL other Americans should be much more concerned about the Democrats attempt to keep Donald Trump from ever running for office again through impeachment.
That is the DC swamp telling every American that THEY choose who is electable, not you.
Think about that, the political elitists are telling every voter nationwide, regardless of political party, that you are not smart enough to choose and elect your own candidates. They will tell you who is acceptable and who they will allow to be voted in.
Every voter in America should be against this, regardless of if you vote left or right.
-
How many people were banned in the last 4 years for mentioning the 100% proven fake Russia collusion hoax?
Asking for a friend
https://www.brighteon.com/53c3fe7e-1ebe-434a-a1a5-a6522b05cdc2
-
You actually believe the millions of people being dropped were all inciting violence? You probably watch CNN a lot, don't you?
neither
Holding Large internet companies to account is a problem around the world. Its is not so long ago that the US was taking offence at EU efforts to bring some accountability and responsibility.
-
The first problem with you is that you find fucking "dirty". The second problem is that you want freedom while being a biggot. The third problem is that if you want what you say you want, you cannot look at the world through a $$$ colored glasses....
Porn is degenerate and shouldn’t be in easy access to children online especially on a big platform like Twitter.
-
The first problem with you is that you find fucking "dirty".
When have I ever said I found the act of fucking dirty? When I said the "dirtiest porn" being uploaded, I literally mean the dirtiest porn. Just yesterday, a friend of mine sent me a link to a Twitter page that literally had 2 crackheads fucking on video with their bodies littered with purplish rashes (Kaposi sarcoma) that are most commonly seen on people with AIDS and with obvious track marks on their arms. That's what I mean by "dirtiest porn". If you find that beautiful or enjoyable enough to get off on, that's fine by me, but I think I'll pass.
The second problem is that you want freedom while being a biggot.
Bigot? You realize I am self-deprecating Jew who has literally been spit on by Orthodox Jews (in Israel) for being too liberal with my religious views and I'm also gay. Dude, I'm practically a walking contradiction. Moreover, I am all for being friends with everyone, from all walks of life. I have no hate in my heart my man.
I think you might have me confused. But I don't hold that against you. I respect your views.
The third problem is that if you want what you say you want, you cannot look at the world through a $$$ colored glasses.
What $$$ colored glasses do you speak of? I am not rich. Nor do I own the large media companies (like Twitter) that are now impinging on your freedom of speech and privacy. I am just a regular guy, much like you and everyone else.
I don't know, but maybe we got off on the wrong foot. Here, I'll extend the hand....
Hi, I'm OMR. It's a pleasure to meet you sir.
"1"
-
Link to said porn please ;D :P
The 2 crackheads (with AIDS rashes and track marks) having sex got removed as I tried to share it with some friends today in order to showcase how backwards Twitter is, but it's gone. There seems to be frank porn displayed on Twitter at all times though. Check this little gem I found today:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1352721049822101505 (https://twitter.com/i/status/1352721049822101505)
"1"
-
Amazing how Trump and the MyPillow guy get banned, while you can have the dirtiest porn uploaded onto Twitter (couples fucking) with no problems whatsoever in the form of a banning.
"1"
The Ayatollah was on twitter, openly threatening the US.
-
I don't know, but maybe we got off on the wrong foot. Here, I'll extend the hand....
Hi, I'm OMR. It's a pleasure to meet you sir.
"1"
No need to extend the hand, one finger would do.
-
amazing how many getbiggers are outraged at a private company being forced to bake cakes for queers yet have no problem with private companies banning incitement to violence
you seem to be arguing that incitement to violence is not as serious a problem as copulating
I don't think so.
See, here's the thing, I DO NOT believe Donald Trump was inciting violence. On the contrary, I thought he was communicating as he always did with the US people through Twitter for the last 4 years. I simply think the media/tech companies got really pissed at Trump for wanting to change the laws by bringing in reform to Section 230 (the law which protects online platforms from being held liable for content their users’ post on their sites). As a result of the threat that Trump was trying to bring to their digital doorstep, all the tech companies ganged up on Trump and made him excommunicado and made sure to push his close friends/allies into the same bag.
Now, I don't want to hijack this thread and make it political, so I'll just say that I don't agree with the notion that the incitement of violence is not as serious as copulation. I think true incitement of violence is pretty serious (much like what ANTIFA & BLM did during the George Floyd riots). Somehow, BLM didn't get banned from all tech/media outlets and ANTIFA still posts through various mediums as well.
Regarding the MyPillow guy inciting violence. To be fair, I didn't follow the MyPillow guy or his posts, so there might be some truth to the incitement of violence comment, but if anyone is retarded enough to follow what the MyPillow guy says, they might very well deserve what comes to them by way of violence that they take part in. That's as stupid as it would be to follow the ShamWow guy.
(https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/09/15/article-2421116-1BD6D291000005DC-783_308x185.jpg)
"1"
-
The Ayatollah was on twitter, openly threatening the US.
Dorsey agrees with him so he doesn't get banned.
-
The Ayatollah was on twitter, openly threatening the US.
Did they ever ban him?
"1"
-
You and ALL other Americans should be much more concerned about the Democrats attempt to keep Donald Trump from ever running for office again through impeachment.
The is the DC swamp telling every American that THEY choose who is electable, not you.
Think about that, the political elitists are telling every voter nationwide, regardless of political party, that you are not smart enough to choose and elect your own candidates. They will tell you who is acceptable and who they will allow to be voted in.
Every voter in America should be against this, regardless of if you vote left or right.
None of the Democratic primary candidates had less of a grassroots movement than Biden yet he got the nod because he is a DC insider who can be counted on to never rock the boat.
-
[1] None of what you say applies to monopolies, and Big Tech is approaching monopolistic power on the provision of social media. Especially when these scumbags explicitly violate their contract in taking Parker offline, by not giving them 30 days notice. They didn't even give them 30 hours notice.
Again, it's moving towards a technocracy.
[2] The private business argument. Uh huh. Except when forcing Christian bakers to bake a cake for a homosexual wedding, while ignoring Muslim bakers who do the same thing.
These are the rights that private businesses have. Not saying it's fair, it's just the laws we have in place.
I'm not meeting any new Jews from now on, as they are the group most responsible for pushing this bullshit. People of colour have no power, and so they never did anything bad to me - they were just the pets of Jews and White liberals.
But they are liabilities, and I refuse to play this stupid game of me being forced to bake a gay cake for a Jewish gay couple, when the reverse would NEVER FUCKING HAPPEN - EVER.
Non-Whites had a great scam in North America - they got to claim oppression while Whites were sucking their dicks, forced into it by Jews.
No more.
At this point, everyone notices the volume of anti-male and anti-White discrimination in our culture. The current system will not hold up. Kirstie Alley had 80K Twitter followers removed, FFS, LOL. Only now that it's impacting over 50% of the White population directly, does everyone acknowledge it.
In fairness, I was talking about this since 2007. I was only met with scorn. But I was never wrong.
Matt, tell me their names. Who are these Jews you speak of? I am sure I don't know them personally, but I will gladly reach out to them via the Fascist Underground Community of Killer Jews (long name for our shorter acronym FUCK Jews).
Your hatred of Jews as a people is deeply rooted, but know there are many more of us. More of us that have no control of the media, politics or anything that remotely affects your life. There are many of us, who much like you, don't like many Jews as well. I for one am not a fan of Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Bernie Madoff and a few others. That doesn't mean I will go ahead and paint people with the same broad brush.
One day, when you come to New York, I will introduce you to my Jewish friends. You will like us. You will like us because we are not like the Jews you've probably engaged with during your time. You will like us, because we are much like everyone else. My friends and I like American food, working out, MMA, discussing economics and politics, porn, playing poker, owning dogs and we even like Donald Trump (very much actually). We also dislike extremes of any facet.
I'll send you one of my rainbow colored yarmulkes and I am sure you will feel better once you wear it.
"1"
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/wBYwQmqX/Eso-A234-Uw-AAa-k2.jpg)
-
Again, it's moving towards a technocracy.
These are the rights that private businesses have. Not saying it's fair, it's just the laws we have in place.
Matt, tell me their names. Who are these Jews you speak of? I am sure I don't know them personally, but I will gladly reach out to them via the Fascist Underground Community of Killer Jews (long name for our shorter acronym FUCK Jews).
Your hatred of Jews as a people is deeply rooted, but know there are many more of us. More of us that have no control of the media, politics or anything that remotely affects your life. There are many of us, who much like you, don't like many Jews as well. I for one am not a fan of Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Bernie Madoff and a few others. That doesn't mean I will go ahead and paint people with the same broad brush.
One day, when you come to New York, I will introduce you to my Jewish friends. You will like us. You will like us because we are not like the Jews you've probably engaged with during your time. You will like us, because we are much like everyone else. My friends and I like American food, working out, MMA, discussing economics and politics, porn, playing poker, owning dogs and we even like Donald Trump (very much actually). We also dislike extremes of any facet.
I'll send you one of my rainbow colored yarmulkes and I am sure you will feel better once you wear it.
"1"
Jason Stern tried this shit with me.
None of that changes the fact that Jews are the #1 driving force pushing Whites to minority status in Western society. So cut the shit about how as an individual Jew, you are powerless.
I couldn't help but notice you say NOTHING each time some White Guilt "woke" curriculum is being forced on White people. Most recently in a third grade math class in Missouri.. Meanwhile, WHAT THE FUCK DOES A 7-YEAR-OLD WHITE CHILD HAVE TO DO WITH THAT?
Answer THAT one, OneMoreRep.
-
And why are homos forcing Christian bakers to bake them wedding cakes?
This is why I'm done playing this game.
Jews, women, people of colour, all the diversity of the rainbow 🌈 [!] are welcome in my life.
It's just that I swear to God, I'll slit their fucking throats if they do.
What the fuck are you going to do about it?
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/wBYwQmqX/Eso-A234-Uw-AAa-k2.jpg)
We know what masters he serves.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ek8zbOzXIAAwpyY.jpg)
(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/511iZJ2nz7L._AC_SX466_.jpg)
"1"
-
This is why I'm done playing this game.
Jews, women, people of colour, all the diversity of the rainbow 🌈 [!] are welcome in my life.
It's just that I swear to God, I'll slit their fucking throats if they do.
What the fuck are you going to do about it?
My gosh Matty, relax brother. We're all civilized here my man. No need to slit any throats bro.
Jason Stern tried this shit with me.
None of that changes the fact that Jews are the #1 driving force pushing Whites to minority status in Western society. So cut the shit about how as an individual Jew, you are powerless.
I couldn't help but notice you say NOTHING each time some White Guilt "woke" curriculum is being forced on White people. Most recently in a third grade math class in Missouri.. Meanwhile, WHAT THE FUCK DOES A 7-YEAR-OLD WHITE CHILD HAVE TO DO WITH THAT?
Answer THAT one, OneMoreRep.
What's wrong with Jason Stern? Wasn't he funny?
Matt, I am not here to save the world. I can only do my part as an individual to change the cycle of hate, by embracing people of all backgrounds and beliefs.
I do my part here on GetBig.
"1"
-
My gosh Matty, relax brother. We're all civilized here my man. No need to slit any throats bro.
What's wrong with Jason Stern? Wasn't he funny?
Matt, I am not here to save the world. I can only do my part as an individual to change the cycle of hate, by embracing people of all backgrounds and beliefs.
I do my part here on GetBig.
"1"
You and I are cool, OneMoreRep. We met before I became racially aware, and I'm not going to retroactively cancel diversity out of my life, as the reverse is done - such as Chris Hart [the Black actor in Grudge Match - I think his name is Chris] was cancelled for saying phaggot with an F on Twitter... probably ten years ago.
But I want you to understand my "No Jews Allowed" policy is based in something rational. Take this case of an Indigenous woman [who turned out to be 21, and not 17], who repeatedly spat on a White female police officer.
No Crown Attorney would touch this case, because it was bullshit, and the cop herself was assaulted. In a FAIR world, the Indigenous WOMAN [not teen] would have been charged.
But no.
Not only was she not charged - but the White female police officer who was ASSAULTED by the piece of shit was charged! Only under the bullshit Ontario Police Services Act, but still:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/5946328/thunder-bay-police-officer-charged/amp
So let me get this straight:
If a woman, Jew, or "person of colour" assaults me, and I DEFEND MYSELF, *I* will be assaulted.
That's when I decided I'm no longer going to be involved with "protected groups". I'm supposed to accept not being legally allowed self-defense? Fuck that.
People can have any excuse they have to not speak to any one. But my inability to legally defend myself is not "any excuse". It's a completely valid one.
When I stop hearing of cases of White people getting in trouble for defending themselves, and FIVE YEARS passes of fairness, I will CONSIDER speaking to protected groups again.
Until then, no chance.
I would change my mind through torture, threat of murder, etc. That's about it.
-
You and I are cool, OneMoreRep. We met before I became racially aware, and I'm not going to retroactively cancel diversity out of my life, as the reverse is done - such as Chris Hart [the Black actor in Grudge Match - I think his name is Chris] was cancelled for saying phaggot with an F on Twitter... probably ten years ago.
But I want you to understand my "No Jews Allowed" policy is based in something rational. Take this case of an Indigenous woman [who turned out to be 21, and not 17], who repeatedly spat on a White female police officer.
No Crown Attorney would touch this case, because it was bullshit, and the cop herself was assaulted. In a FAIR world, the Indigenous WOMAN [not teen] would have been charged.
But no.
Not only was she not charged - but the White female police officer who was ASSAULTED by the piece of shit was charged! Only under the bullshit Ontario Police Services Act, but still:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/5946328/thunder-bay-police-officer-charged/amp
So let me get this straight:
If a woman, Jew, or "person of colour" assaults me, and I DEFEND MYSELF, *I* will be assaulted.
That's when I decided I'm no longer going to be involved with "protected groups". I'm supposed to accept not being legally allowed self-defense? Fuck that.
People can have any excuse they have to not speak to any one. But my inability to legally defend myself is not "any excuse". It's a completely valid one.
When I stop hearing of cases of White people getting in trouble for defending themselves, and FIVE YEARS passes of fairness, I will CONSIDER speaking to protected groups again.
Until then, no chance.
I would change my mind through torture, threat of murder, etc. That's about it.
Holy fuck.
Listen to your Doctor.
Take your medicine.
Turn off the internet for a few days and try to get a little bit of a grasp of reality.
-
Matt is right in parts but he has to take into account that most of the struggle in the modern world is a class struggle and racial struggle has been maximized via corporate tactics. Most people self segregate according to various criteria - after all we are tribal. We are designed to cooperate with equals to survive.
Lower level jews are mostly canon fodder - see Israel which is a hodge podge of differently blooded choochoos(social standing often determined by skin color) sitting in a desert... which beneficial "superjew" would put his "brothers" in a sand castle? I love how all the wealthy choos live abroad(US/Europe of course) and maybe have a nice appartments/houses in "pink" Tel Aviv... it's easy to be in favor of something you do not have to endure. It's also a shame that Germany had to be destroyed for a postage stamp sized experiment.
-
(https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/142952411_3020187454875547_6546932359081843711_o.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=2&_nc_sid=9267fe&_nc_ohc=66u7l1sXkGAAX-CczxK&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=22825d0da4a56971f5cd6e43b000fb41&oe=6035E194)
-
This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy
Basically, any ballot measure that they think you are 'misleading' the liberal agenda, you will be suspended or banned. Anytime you wish to debate or talk about a ballot or measure that is not in the correct 'thinking' mode, you will be suspended or banned. You are not allowed any free speech when it appears to 'mislead' any measure or ballot, or if you decided later on to talk about an outcome that was not to your liking, bye bye.
The days of free speech and thought is becoming dangerously close to going away. Say something someone doesnt like, and they will go after you with bullying, calls, bad reviews and more, and then suspend you. Wow.
This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy
Civic integrity policy
Overview
January 2021
You may not use Twitter’s services for the purpose of manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes. This includes posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process. In addition, we may label and reduce the visibility of Tweets containing false or misleading information about civic processes in order to provide additional context.
The public conversation occurring on Twitter is never more important than during elections and other civic events. Any attempts to undermine the integrity of our service is antithetical to our fundamental rights and undermines the core tenets of freedom of expression, the value upon which our company is based.
We believe we have a responsibility to protect the integrity of those conversations from interference and manipulation. Therefore, we prohibit attempts to use our services to manipulate or disrupt civic processes, including through the distribution of false or misleading information about the procedures or circumstances around participation in a civic process. In instances where misleading information does not seek to directly manipulate or disrupt civic processes, but leads to confusion on our service, we may label the Tweets to give additional context.
What is a civic process?
Twitter considers civic processes to be events or procedures mandated, organized, and conducted by the governing and/or electoral body of a country, state, region, district, or municipality to address a matter of common concern through public participation. Some examples of civic processes may include:
Political elections
Censuses
Major referenda and ballot initiatives
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/wBYwQmqX/Eso-A234-Uw-AAa-k2.jpg)
He is #winning. Joe Biden = MAGA.
-
Here we go...
https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/26/mypillow-ceo-mike-lindell-banned-from-twitter/
Trumptards are hilarious
Fuck that stupid coke-head Traitor
-
This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy
Basically, any ballot measure that they think you are 'misleading' the liberal agenda, you will be suspended or banned. Anytime you wish to debate or talk about a ballot or measure that is not in the correct 'thinking' mode, you will be suspended or banned. You are not allowed any free speech when it appears to 'mislead' any measure or ballot, or if you decided later on to talk about an outcome that was not to your liking, bye bye.
The days of free speech and thought is becoming dangerously close to going away. Say something someone doesnt like, and they will go after you with bullying, calls, bad reviews and more, and then suspend you. Wow.
This is Twitter's Civic Integrity Policy
Civic integrity policy
Overview
January 2021
You may not use Twitter’s services for the purpose of manipulating or interfering in elections or other civic processes. This includes posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process. In addition, we may label and reduce the visibility of Tweets containing false or misleading information about civic processes in order to provide additional context.
The public conversation occurring on Twitter is never more important than during elections and other civic events. Any attempts to undermine the integrity of our service is antithetical to our fundamental rights and undermines the core tenets of freedom of expression, the value upon which our company is based.
We believe we have a responsibility to protect the integrity of those conversations from interference and manipulation. Therefore, we prohibit attempts to use our services to manipulate or disrupt civic processes, including through the distribution of false or misleading information about the procedures or circumstances around participation in a civic process. In instances where misleading information does not seek to directly manipulate or disrupt civic processes, but leads to confusion on our service, we may label the Tweets to give additional context.
What is a civic process?
Twitter considers civic processes to be events or procedures mandated, organized, and conducted by the governing and/or electoral body of a country, state, region, district, or municipality to address a matter of common concern through public participation. Some examples of civic processes may include:
Political elections
Censuses
Major referenda and ballot initiatives
BIG Libtard Tech will also prevent you from spinning up any new platforms to circumvent these policies.
If this country is not in a civil war in the next 4 years I'd be surprised. Racism and hate are the highest I've even seen in my life.
-
Trumptards are hilarious
Fuck that stupid coke-head Traitor
You better be careful talking about Hunter Biden in that manner....
Big Tech is watching
-
Well said and that's exactly what is happening. Big Tech has always been a wolf in sheeps clothing.
The Europeans (e.g., Angela Merkel in Germany) think that the government (rather than the companies themselves) should be the ones policing what happens on social media (according to “very clearly defined criteria”, they say). Isn’t that an even riskier proposition? It is unclear what is the best solution to speech monitoring on social media.
People talk about “breaking the companies up into smaller units”, but what exactly does that accomplish? And doing what Trump wanted (letting the companies be sued right and left) seems like that would stifle speech rather than liberate it.
Total conundrum. Just stay off Twitter and Facebook is the best advice.
-
The Europeans (e.g., Angela Merkel in Germany) think that the government (rather than the companies themselves) should be the ones policing what happens on social media (according to “very clearly defined criteria”, they say). Isn’t that an even riskier proposition? It is unclear what is the best solution to speech monitoring on social media.
People talk about “breaking the companies up into smaller units”, but what exactly does that accomplish? And doing what Trump wanted (letting the companies be sued right and left) seems like that would stifle speech rather than liberate it.
Total conundrum. Just stay off Twitter and Facebook is the best advice.
Agreed. If people stopped using social media their power would end.
I've never had any social media and I'm just fine. I don't need the likes from fake online friends. My true firends can find me.
-
WOOOOOOSSHHHH
18-Year-Old College Student Turns His Father in to FBI, Gets $138K on GoFundMe
https://needtoknow.news/2021/01/18-year-old-college-student-turns-his-father-in-to-fbi-gets-138k-on-gofundme/
In 1984, the Junior Spies is the name of a youth organization run by the Party. Its primary aim is to keep an eye out on any adults, not just parents, who might be guilty of disloyalty or treason.
-
This is why I'm glad I don't have kids. No matter how well you raise them they may be brainwashed into some soy boy faggotry.