Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: OzmO on March 05, 2021, 01:30:02 PM

Title: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 05, 2021, 01:30:02 PM
https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html (https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html)

What the fuck is wrong with these people?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 05, 2021, 03:49:36 PM
Blurring the line between boys and girls to cause as much confusion in our youth as possible. Making it socially unacceptable to speak out against this is the medias job. The media is our enemy.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 05, 2021, 04:04:05 PM
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/83/e3/3f/83e33f092dcf0356e8de2090783a2777.jpg)

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/9a/5c/f4/9a5cf4e3d8f115aa24596bcfe92b6c47.jpg)

(https://media.vanityfair.com/photos/594bfd87abcbd63dc43099b4/master/w_400%2Cc_limit/famous-women-wearing-menswear-ss11.jpg)
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 05, 2021, 04:14:34 PM
Too lazy to read the article right now.  But, if it is as cut and dry as this thread title appears, I have a problem with it.  Leave it to the Democrats to always find ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 05, 2021, 04:15:33 PM
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: ThisisOverload on March 05, 2021, 04:44:14 PM


Them sistas got all horned up on that dude.

He pulled it off pretty well though.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 05, 2021, 06:43:42 PM
Prime getting all creepy in this thread.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: IroNat on March 06, 2021, 05:00:46 AM
"I don't recall signs in toy aisles that say "Boys" or "Girls".
For clothing, yes.
So, the next step is no "Mens" or "Womens" sections.
If you're a "tran-whatzit" how will you know where in the store to go?"


(https://media1.tenor.com/images/3988693e4ef16ba22d6173e1341b1386/tenor.gif?itemid=8127721)
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 06, 2021, 08:24:46 AM
CA is the leader in promoting and encouraging mental illness.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 06, 2021, 11:57:25 AM
https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html (https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html)

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

who give a fuck

Did you also get your panties in a twist when Target chose to do this exact same thing on their own 5  year ago?
https://corporate.target.com/article/2015/08/gender-based-signs-corporate
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 06, 2021, 12:35:22 PM
who give a fuck

Did you also get your panties in a twist when Target chose to do this exact same thing on their own 5  year ago?
https://corporate.target.com/article/2015/08/gender-based-signs-corporate
So Target made a choice and wasn't legislated by some fuckstick democrat loser in Sucramento? Weird.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 06, 2021, 01:12:50 PM
who give a fuck

Did you also get your panties in a twist when Target chose to do this exact same thing on their own 5  year ago?
https://corporate.target.com/article/2015/08/gender-based-signs-corporate

I'd expect you to know the difference between a private business making a choice and a law being proposed.

But then again....

Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 06, 2021, 03:19:14 PM
I'd expect you to know the difference between a private business making a choice and a law being proposed.

But then again....

then again, that has NEVER stopped right wing dipshits from complaining about anything.

Look at Dr Suess "controversy".  That was a choice SOLELY by the Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. yet right wing dipshits spent the last week pissing and moaning about it ....meanwhile Dr,. Seuss made 30 million dollars last year.

Can't you find anything more meaningful to bitch about?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 06, 2021, 03:36:21 PM
Can't you find anything more meaningful to bitch about?
Hypocrite. Your side cries 24/7/365 about the most benign bullshit. You guys just willy-nilly make up "problems"
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 06, 2021, 03:40:35 PM
Hypocrite. Your side cries 24/7/365 about the most benign bullshit. You guys just willy-nilly make up "problems"

constant grievous over bullshit is part of the Republican platform (remember the one that THE TRAITOR was too lazy to rewrite)

Wahhhhh!!!

Everything is so unfair

Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Teutonic Knight on March 06, 2021, 03:44:51 PM
constant grievous over bullshit is part of the Republican platform (remember the one that THE TRAITOR was too lazy to rewrite)

Wahhhhh!!!

Everything is so unfair



a) TRAITOR was yours fascist grandpa , FACT !.

b) Stop baby  :'( :'( :'( , there is NO Kamala/Nancy medals for YOU, yeah this is UNFAIR !.  ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 06, 2021, 04:23:55 PM
who give a fuck

Did you also get your panties in a twist when Target chose to do this exact same thing on their own 5  year ago?
https://corporate.target.com/article/2015/08/gender-based-signs-corporate

Don’t worry you can still buy a dress or Barbie dolls.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 06, 2021, 05:48:22 PM
TDS
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 06, 2021, 06:39:12 PM
CA is the leader in promoting and encouraging mental illness.

This explains why you call California home. "Birds of a feather flock together."
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Coach is Back! on March 06, 2021, 07:43:55 PM
https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html (https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html)

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

You tell us.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 07, 2021, 06:09:31 PM
You tell us.

How would I know?

Boys are boys and girls are girls.  If someone wants to blur those lines, that's on them and I fully support their right to any lifestyle they choose.  I don't care.  But I don't support having those views forced on me when the existing system doesn't infringe on their right to shop in boys or girls sections.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 08, 2021, 07:29:43 AM
then again, that has NEVER stopped right wing dipshits from complaining about anything.

Look at Dr Suess "controversy".  That was a choice SOLELY by the Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. yet right wing dipshits spent the last week pissing and moaning about it ....meanwhile Dr,. Seuss made 30 million dollars last year.

Can't you find anything more meaningful to bitch about?

Stay on point. 

Topic:  California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law

Question:  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Possible discussion points:

1. Agree with law, nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
2. Disagree with law, something wrong with these people, and here is why.
3. Disagree with law, but nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
4. Agree with law, but mething wrong with these people, and here is why.

List of things NOT on point:

- right wing dipshits from complaining about anything
- Look at Dr Suess "controversy".
- Private companies that make their own merchandising choices.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 08, 2021, 07:41:18 AM


I am thinking you are trying to make a point.  What would that be?

Keep in mind, the assertion is not about people choosing a lifestyle.  It's about a proposed law that would require retailers not to have boys and girls sections at their stores.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 08, 2021, 07:50:05 AM
Blurring the line between boys and girls to cause as much confusion in our youth as possible.

I raised two children in California.  They are adults now, both straight (not that it would matter in the least to me).  Never had any issues with them knowing what they were or what they wanted to be, even with a very progressive left x-wife.   Same with many other parents who raised children in California that I know. 

So I don't agree that this is an issue. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 08, 2021, 08:20:06 AM
Too lazy to read the article right now.  But, if it is as cut and dry as this thread title appears, I have a problem with it.  Leave it to the Democrats to always find ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

happens a lot. lol
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 08, 2021, 12:01:21 PM
Too lazy to read the article right now.  But, if it is as cut and dry as this thread title appears, I have a problem with it.  Leave it to the Democrats to always find ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The tread title is somewhat misleading in that they are referring to a broad spectrum of merchandise. If this becomes law retailers would be required to remove gendered signage in the toy, childcare, and clothing sections. "We hope to inspire, for example, more girls to get into science and engineering and mathematics, we want to ensure that those periodic tables and dinosaurs are not in the boys’ section,” said Assemblyman Evan Low. “We just want to let kids be kids.” News flash for Assemblyman Low, kids already do this on their own. They don't need help from idiot politicians.

Children will choose the toys they wish to play with, much as they always have. It is the parents who sometimes seek to direct their kids towards certain items for various reasons. Since it is the parents who purchase said items, nothing much will change regardless of how the merchandise is arranged.

My personal opinion is that it is not something government should make law. In this case changing the signage means almost nothing, retailers are still free to arrange boys and girls items separately on different shelves or racks. If enough customers want gender neutral sections for their kids, retailers will respond accordingly. Likewise, if parents prefer gender specific areas, retailers will comply. There's an old saying in business which says, 'The customer is always right'.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 08, 2021, 06:05:01 PM
I raised two children in California.  They are adults now, both straight (not that it would matter in the least to me).  Never had any issues with them knowing what they were or what they wanted to be, even with a very progressive left x-wife.   Same with many other parents who raised children in California that I know. 

So I don't agree that this is an issue.
Times have changed dramatically in the last 10 years. Particularly the last 5. You might feel different if you had an elementary/middle school aged child in the public CA education system.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 09, 2021, 05:13:38 PM
https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html (https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article249695008.html)

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

They have lost their dang minds. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 09, 2021, 05:14:38 PM
Stay on point. 

Topic:  California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law

Question:  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Possible discussion points:

1. Agree with law, nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
2. Disagree with law, something wrong with these people, and here is why.
3. Disagree with law, but nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
4. Agree with law, but mething wrong with these people, and here is why.

List of things NOT on point:

- right wing dipshits from complaining about anything
- Look at Dr Suess "controversy".
- Private companies that make their own merchandising choices.

Good luck with that.  lol
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 11, 2021, 09:01:16 AM
Times have changed dramatically in the last 10 years. Particularly the last 5. You might feel different if you had an elementary/middle school aged child in the public CA education system.

They were in the thick of it as we lived fairly close to San Francisco.  The idea that this type of thing is confusing to kids really isn't true any more than any other complicated thing they learn about as they grow up.  I have a grandson too who is in elementary school both his Mom and Dad don't have any issues with this type of thing.

Now, I don't disagree with you that the public school system is crap there and has been getting worse.  My grandson goes to a type of charter school which is cool and they can be better than the standard public schools.  I just don't think in the context of explaining and respecting different lifestyles is an issue here. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 11, 2021, 05:47:15 PM
I just don't think in the context of explaining and respecting different lifestyles is an issue here.
At what age do you think it's the public school systems responsibility to teach your children about sex?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 11, 2021, 08:17:37 PM
They were in the thick of it as we lived fairly close to San Francisco.  The idea that this type of thing is confusing to kids really isn't true any more than any other complicated thing they learn about as they grow up.  I have a grandson too who is in elementary school both his Mom and Dad don't have any issues with this type of thing.

Now, I don't disagree with you that the public school system is crap there and has been getting worse.  My grandson goes to a type of charter school which is cool and they can be better than the standard public schools.  I just don't think in the context of explaining and respecting different lifestyles is an issue here.

We have this program called Pono Choices where they teach elementary school kids things like the anus is a genital.  Parents can opt out of the program.  I don't know how they reconcile this stuff with science. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 12, 2021, 05:35:27 AM
We have this program called Pono Choices where they teach elementary school kids things like the anus is a genital.  Parents can opt out of the program.  I don't know how they reconcile this stuff with science.

Seriously?  By definition, it's not a genital. 

That's overthinking explaining this.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 12, 2021, 05:39:01 AM
At what age do you think it's the public school systems responsibility to teach your children about sex?

As a parent, I didn't leave it up to the school system.  I knew, just like myself, I would learn much of it before I was educated on it formally.  I was 14 when the school system had students take sex education.  I think that's too late now with all the sex everywhere on TV and the internet.  We learned reproduction more than anything else.   
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 12, 2021, 09:58:30 AM
Seriously?  By definition, it's not a genital. 

That's overthinking explaining this.

That's like saying anyone with an X and Y chromosome, a penis, and balls is by definition a male.  It should be that simple.  But not in today's world. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 12, 2021, 10:16:43 AM
That's like saying anyone with an X and Y chromosome, a penis, and balls is by definition a male.  It should be that simple.  But not in today's world.

Yeah, it's crazy.  Why are things like gender identity a discussion?  Why is there a debate on whether or not a man who identifies as a woman should be able to use a female bathroom?

If you have a penis you are a male PERIOD.   No one is telling these people they can't identify the way they want.  They just can't pretend they don't have a penis.

But that's not enough for them because they feel victimized so they want to burden everyone else by requiring them to see the world as they do. 

That's not true freedom. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Teutonic Knight on March 12, 2021, 10:46:20 AM
Prime getting all creepy in this thread.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 12, 2021, 10:57:50 AM
Yeah, it's crazy.  Why are things like gender identity a discussion?  Why is there a debate on whether or not a man who identifies as a woman should be able to use a female bathroom?

If you have a penis you are a male PERIOD.   No one is telling these people they can't identify the way they want.  They just can't pretend they don't have a penis.

But that's enough for them because they feel victimized so they want to burden everyone else by requiring them to see the world as they do. 

That's not true freedom.

I agree.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 12, 2021, 12:15:56 PM
for fucks sake

you idiots are still talking about this?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 12, 2021, 12:28:15 PM
for fucks sake

you idiots are still talking about this?

Yeah, it's called having a discussion by staying on point instead of deflecting like a little bitch.   ;)
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Teutonic Knight on March 12, 2021, 12:28:48 PM
for fucks sake

you idiots are still talking about this?

Fascist grandkid Bob is upset again  ::)
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 12, 2021, 06:18:58 PM
Yeah, it's called having a discussion by staying on point instead of deflecting like a little bitch.   ;)
;D

That's like saying anyone with an X and Y chromosome, a penis, and balls is by definition a male.  It should be that simple.  But not in today's world. 
Right?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: SOMEPARTS on March 12, 2021, 10:33:35 PM
for fucks sake

you idiots are still talking about this?


Translation. The orders have been handed down from the communist party. You must obey and not dicuss.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 14, 2021, 06:09:04 PM
The tread title is somewhat misleading in that they are referring to a broad spectrum of merchandise. If this becomes law retailers would be required to remove gendered signage in the toy, childcare, and clothing sections. "We hope to inspire, for example, more girls to get into science and engineering and mathematics, we want to ensure that those periodic tables and dinosaurs are not in the boys’ section,” said Assemblyman Evan Low. “We just want to let kids be kids.” News flash for Assemblyman Low, kids already do this on their own. They don't need help from idiot politicians.

Children will choose the toys they wish to play with, much as they always have. It is the parents who sometimes seek to direct their kids towards certain items for various reasons. Since it is the parents who purchase said items, nothing much will change regardless of how the merchandise is arranged.

My personal opinion is that it is not something government should make law. In this case changing the signage means almost nothing, retailers are still free to arrange boys and girls items separately on different shelves or racks. If enough customers want gender neutral sections for their kids, retailers will respond accordingly. Likewise, if parents prefer gender specific areas, retailers will comply. There's an old saying in business which says, 'The customer is always right'.

misleading people is a necessary tool to get  idiots fired up

I saw numerous clips last week of right wing blow holes losing their minds over Dr. Suess and assigning this non-existent "cancellation" to the left.  Not one single host bothered to mention that this was a choice by Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. (which made 30 million dollars last year) and more importantly not a single one bothered to show the actual content in the books that were being discontinued in order to discuss the actual merits of the decision of the copyright holder (Dr. Suess Enterprises).

In the case of this proposed legislation in California the impetus seems to have been a staffer’s 9-year-old daughter, who wanted to know why she had to go into the “boys” aisle to find science-related toys

Given all the other problems we're dealing with I don't see this as a burning issue but humans never seem to miss an opportunity to be offended by each other

Personally I don't give a shit one or the other and I can't believe anyone else really does either
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 14, 2021, 06:24:38 PM
Yeah, it's called having a discussion by staying on point instead of deflecting like a little bitch.   ;)

you idiots never miss an opportunity to find grievance in anything
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: SOMEPARTS on March 14, 2021, 08:24:11 PM
you idiots never miss an opportunity to find grievance in anything


Extreme irony considering your posts from 2016-2020.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 15, 2021, 06:28:25 AM
you idiots never miss an opportunity to find grievance in anything

And you never miss an opportunity to engage in TDS or deflect.

It's actually comical considering the volume of your TDS for you to try and make this argument.

 ::)

Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 15, 2021, 08:54:06 AM
The tread title is somewhat misleading in that they are referring to a broad spectrum of merchandise. If this becomes law retailers would be required to remove gendered signage in the toy, childcare, and clothing sections. "We hope to inspire, for example, more girls to get into science and engineering and mathematics, we want to ensure that those periodic tables and dinosaurs are not in the boys’ section,” said Assemblyman Evan Low. “We just want to let kids be kids.” News flash for Assemblyman Low, kids already do this on their own. They don't need help from idiot politicians.

Children will choose the toys they wish to play with, much as they always have. It is the parents who sometimes seek to direct their kids towards certain items for various reasons. Since it is the parents who purchase said items, nothing much will change regardless of how the merchandise is arranged.

My personal opinion is that it is not something government should make law. In this case changing the signage means almost nothing, retailers are still free to arrange boys and girls items separately on different shelves or racks. If enough customers want gender neutral sections for their kids, retailers will respond accordingly. Likewise, if parents prefer gender specific areas, retailers will comply. There's an old saying in business which says, 'The customer is always right'.

I agree.  I think it's a waste of time, money, and effort.  This is over-regulation.  A good parent will inspire their child to pursue whatever endeavor they choose, signage notwithstanding.

Which leads me to the question:  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 15, 2021, 02:12:27 PM
I agree.  I think it's a waste of time, money, and effort.  This is over-regulation.  A good parent will inspire their child to pursue whatever endeavor they choose, signage notwithstanding.

Which leads me to the question:  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

At times it seems there are far too many rules and laws, many of which are either not enforced or not practically enforceable. In Oregon, it is illegal to use your cell phone when driving which includes when you are stopped at a traffic light. While I agree that doing this is distracted driving, making it illegal to do doesn't seem to have had much impact on folks, since many still do it. Fortunately 86% of all new vehicles offer Bluetooth as an option. It should be standard in all new vehicles.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 15, 2021, 02:37:41 PM
And you never miss an opportunity to engage in TDS or deflect.

It's actually comical considering the volume of your TDS for you to try and make this argument.

 ::)

LOL - pot calling the kettle black much

FYI - the only TDS is Trump Delusion Syndrome from people like you and deflection and conflation comprise about 98% of your posts. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 15, 2021, 03:05:01 PM
LOL - pot calling the kettle black much



Not at all:

Quote
Quote from: Straw Man on March 06, 2021, 03:19:14 PM
then again, that has NEVER stopped right wing dipshits from complaining about anything.

Look at Dr Suess "controversy".  That was a choice SOLELY by the Dr. Seuss Enterprises, L.P. yet right wing dipshits spent the last week pissing and moaning about it ....meanwhile Dr,. Seuss made 30 million dollars last year.

Can't you find anything more meaningful to bitch about?

Stay on point.

Topic:  California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law

Question:  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Possible discussion points:

1. Agree with law, nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
2. Disagree with law, something wrong with these people, and here is why.
3. Disagree with law, but nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
4. Agree with law, but mething wrong with these people, and here is why.

List of things NOT on point:

- right wing dipshits from complaining about anything
- Look at Dr Suess "controversy".
- Private companies that make their own merchandising choices.

Care to try again?  Maybe you can make a credible charge next time?

Quote
FYI - the only TDS is Trump Delusion Syndrome from people like you and deflection and conflation comprise about 98% of your posts.

Based on the deflections of just your posts on this thread, and the fact you've misread my posts before causing you to go on a TDS-infused rant, I'd say you have as much credibility, wait, scratch that, you have less credibility than Donald Trump.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 15, 2021, 03:06:05 PM
At times it seems there are far too many rules and laws, many of which are either not enforced or not practically enforceable. In Oregon, it is illegal to use your cell phone when driving which includes when you are stopped at a traffic light. While I agree that doing this is distracted driving, making it illegal to do doesn't seem to have had much impact on folks, since many still do it. Fortunately 86% of all new vehicles offer Bluetooth as an option. It should be standard in all new vehicles.

For sure.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 15, 2021, 03:13:45 PM
Not at all:

Stay on point.

Topic:  California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law

Question:  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

Possible discussion points:

1. Agree with law, nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
2. Disagree with law, something wrong with these people, and here is why.
3. Disagree with law, but nothing wrong with these people, and here is why.
4. Agree with law, but mething wrong with these people, and here is why.

List of things NOT on point:

- right wing dipshits from complaining about anything
- Look at Dr Suess "controversy".
- Private companies that make their own merchandising choices.

Care to try again?  Maybe you can make a credible charge next time?

Based on the deflections of just your posts on this thread, and the fact you've misread my posts before causing you to go on a TDS-infused rant, I'd say you have as much credibility, wait, scratch that, you have less credibility than Donald Trump.

damn, you must have a lot of time on your hands
My reference to Dr. Suess as an example of how right wing dipshits don't actually look at the specifcs of the thing they have chosen to lose their mind over was germane to your idiotic and misleading thread.  I'm not going to bother explaining it to you
I don't have that much time or patience
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 15, 2021, 03:17:04 PM
damn, you must have a lot of time on your hands
My reference to Dr. Suess as an example of how right wing dipshits don't actually look at the specifcs of the thing they have chosen to lose their mind over was germane to your idiotic and misleading thread.  I'm not going to bother explaining it to you
I don't have that much time or patience

No, your reference was a shitty attempt to deflect so you can rant about your TDS and your general hatred for anyone that doesn't think like you.

 ::)

PS:  It takes no time to expose a mentally imbalanced nut case. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 16, 2021, 07:26:01 PM
No secret here that I am a flaming (no homo) liberal.  Can someone from each side chime in and tell me why I am right and/or wrong about the following:

I am pro trans, pro gay, etc.  You get the drift.  But, I don't think I like the idea of someone with a penis using the same bathroom as my daughter.  Now, if that penis has been reconstructed into a vagina I am probably ok with it. 

Sports:  Again, if you have a penis you should not be playing girls sports in my opinion.  That being said, if you were born with a penis and have it removed, I'm still not sure that you should be able to play in female sports.  For instance, if my son lopped off his cock and wanted to play on a girls hockey team instead of a boys team, I would think that unfair.  Perhaps if the sex change operation took place before puberty, than maybe that's different?

Some fellow liberals reflexively take the woke side in this debate.  For me, it's far from a slam dunk. 

Also, do sex change operations take place on minors legally?  If so, I'm not sure that I'm ok with that either.  My niece at about 12 years of age thought she was meant to be a boy.  Butch hair cut, clothes, etc.  She actually shared her feelings with her parents.  Now, at 16 she has a boyfriend (for about a year) and her hair is long again and that seems to be a distant memory.  I'd hate to see something done at such a young age that could not be easily undone.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 16, 2021, 07:30:06 PM
No secret here that I am a flaming (no homo) liberal.  Can someone from each side chime in and tell me why I am right and/or wrong about the following:

I am pro trans, pro gay, etc.  You get the drift.  But, I don't think I like the idea of someone with a penis using the same bathroom as my daughter.  Now, if that penis has been reconstructed into a vagina I am probably ok with it. 

Sports:  Again, if you have a penis you should not be playing girls sports in my opinion.  That being said, if you were born with a penis and have it removed, I'm still not sure that you should be able to play in female sports.  For instance, if my son lopped off his cock and wanted to play on a girls hockey team instead of a boys team, I would think that unfair.  Perhaps if the sex change operation took place before puberty, than maybe that's different?

Some fellow liberals reflexively take the woke side in this debate.  For me, it's far from a slam dunk. 

Also, do sex change operations take place on minors legally?  If so, I'm not sure that I'm ok with that either.  My niece at about 12 years of age thought she was meant to be a boy.  Butch hair cut, clothes, etc.  She actually shared her feelings with her parents.  Now, at 16 she has a boyfriend (for about a year) and her hair is long again and that seems to be a distant memory.  I'd hate to see something done at such a young age that could not be easily undone.
Quite the conservative point of view you have there, welcome to the dark side. :-*
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 16, 2021, 07:33:39 PM
Quite the conservative point of view you have there, welcome to the dark side. :-*

If you say so.  For me I'd accept anyone for who or what they are.  This, seems more an issue of fairness.  My son is 5'10 and 175 at 17 years old.  If he lops off his cock and switches to girls hockey, he's possibly going to fuck somebody up or take somebody's spot on a team that maybe has more of a birthright to than him. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 16, 2021, 07:43:51 PM
If you say so.  For me I'd accept anyone for who or what they are.  This, seems more an issue of fairness.  My son is 5'10 and 175 at 17 years old.  If he lops off his cock and switches to girls hockey, he's possibly going to fuck somebody up or take somebody's spot on a team that maybe has more of a birthright to than him.
Conservatives accept everyone, just don't want it forced on us.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 16, 2021, 07:45:13 PM
Conservatives accept everyone, just don't want it forced on us.

I'll accept that you are conservative and accepting of others.  However, there are too many unlike you. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 16, 2021, 07:47:26 PM
I'll accept that you are conservative and accepting of others.  However, there are too many unlike you.
You meet resistance when you tell people that we HAVE to accept something forced into our lives.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 16, 2021, 07:48:22 PM
You meet resistance when you tell people that we HAVE to accept something forced into our lives.

To me, same sex marriage isn't being forced into anyones lives. 

To me, allowing people with pricks pee in the ladies room is.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: residue on March 17, 2021, 07:31:23 AM
You meet resistance when you tell people that we HAVE to accept something forced into our lives.

no one is forcing you, you dont like gay marriage, dont get married to a gay person
you dont like abortion, dont have one
you dont like shopping at genderless stores, dont
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 17, 2021, 10:54:17 AM
no one is forcing you, you dont like gay marriage, dont get married to a gay person
you dont like abortion, dont have one
you dont like shopping at genderless stores, dont

I'm in full agreement with you.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: The Scott on March 17, 2021, 05:01:56 PM
no one is forcing you, you dont like gay marriage, dont get married to a gay person
you dont like abortion, dont have one
you dont like shopping at genderless stores, dont

Did you parents never tell you to shush?  Well, shush little one.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 17, 2021, 05:08:47 PM
no one is forcing you, you dont like gay marriage, dont get married to a gay person
you dont like abortion, dont have one
you dont like shopping at genderless stores, dont

I'm in full agreement with you.

Me too.

But if folks on Getbig stopped complaining/whining about such things, they'd have nothing else to say and there would be far fewer posts here.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: The Scott on March 17, 2021, 05:13:50 PM
Me too.

But if folks on Getbig stopped complaining/whining about such things, they'd have nothing else to say and there would be far fewer posts here.

And yet many here and in the real world whined and whined ad nauseam about President Trump and that was fine and dandy.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 17, 2021, 05:21:24 PM
To me, same sex marriage isn't being forced into anyones lives. 

To me, allowing people with pricks pee in the ladies room is.
no one is forcing you, you dont like gay marriage, dont get married to a gay person
you dont like abortion, dont have one
you dont like shopping at genderless stores, dont
There is a difference between "liking" something and being told that you have to like it. If you guys can't see the difference, maybe you're too far gone?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: The Scott on March 17, 2021, 05:28:54 PM
There is a difference between "liking" something and being told that you have to like it. If you guys can't see the difference, maybe you're too far gone?

Careful, my friend.  residue despises being forced to hear the truth.  AbrahamG is a good fellow and often agrees with others here on some topics.  He can agree to disagree in an agreeable fashion.  Did I just write that, LOL?  AbeG is okay.  In some ways he is more agreeable than my youngest brother is but then that one is a voice actor. 

The world is what we make of it and oft times residue seems to want to make it a mess.  Fuck him to Hades.

And if he proves me wrong, fine.  He claims IDF membership in his lifetime.  I doubt it.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 17, 2021, 06:10:54 PM
There is a difference between "liking" something and being told that you have to like it. If you guys can't see the difference, maybe you're too far gone?

No one is forcing you to like gay marriage.  Who is this boogeyman telling you that you have to like it?  Seems as though I'm not the one too far gone.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 17, 2021, 06:20:22 PM
There is a difference between "liking" something and being told that you have to like it. If you guys can't see the difference, maybe you're too far gone?

Who told you that you have to like it ?

Who gives a shit if you like it or not ?

Republican politicians do things that I don't like and I'm sure no one gives a shit either

If/when you grow up you might eventually figure that out
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 17, 2021, 06:28:39 PM
No one is forcing you to like gay marriage.  Who is this boogeyman telling you that you have to like it?  Seems as though I'm not the one too far gone.

Remember a few years ago (or maybe a bit more) when the argument by right wingers and fundies was that legalizing same sex marriage was somehow going to devalue or destroy heterosexual marriage. 

Has that happened yet?

I assume it must have happened and I just didn't notice.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 17, 2021, 06:31:17 PM

Republican politicians do things that I don't like and I'm sure no one gives a shit either

And you spend years crying about it on an obscure bodybuilding message board. :D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Princess L on March 17, 2021, 06:33:45 PM
no one is forcing you, you dont like gay marriage, dont get married to a gay person
you dont like abortion, dont have one
you dont like shopping at genderless stores, dont

So you're saying you're ok with murder?  mmmk
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: chaos on March 17, 2021, 06:34:04 PM
Remember a few years ago (or maybe a bit more) when the argument by right wingers and fundies was that legalizing same sex marriage was somehow going to devalue or destroy heterosexual marriage. 

Has that happened yet?

I assume it must have happened and I just didn't notice.
The liberal push to normalize pedophilia must be completely sane to you. I assume you see no correlation between the legalization of gay marriage and the degradation of society?

Spend less time whining like a bleeding cunt about Trump and look into the perversions your own party is promoting. :-*
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: The Scott on March 17, 2021, 06:36:20 PM
The liberal push to normalize pedophilia must be completely sane to you. I assume you see no correlation between the legalization of gay marriage and the degradation of society?

Spend less time whining like a bleeding cunt about Trump and look into the perversions your own party is promoting. :-*

Straw can't go out in public without people shoving tampons in his mouth.  Fuck the twatlette.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 17, 2021, 06:39:29 PM
Straw can't go out in public without people shoving tampons in his mouth.  Fuck the twatlette.

I can see that you're still an physical, emotional and mental cripple

I guess, unlike your Depends, some things never change
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Straw Man on March 17, 2021, 07:09:15 PM
The liberal push to normalize pedophilia must be completely sane to you. I assume you see no correlation between the legalization of gay marriage and the degradation of society?

Spend less time whining like a bleeding cunt about Trump and look into the perversions your own party is promoting. :-*

can you post some actual facts or is that another one of those things you imagined and now believe is true?

and no I don't see any correlation between gay marriage and the degredation of our society

go ahead and post those facts too
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 17, 2021, 07:38:02 PM
And yet many here and in the real world whined and whined ad nauseam about President Trump and that was fine and dandy.

Hmm, seems to me those whining about Trump were/are very much outnumbered by those who supported and continued to support him.

Anyway, I wasn't complaining, i.e. whining about the whiners on Getbig; I was stating a fact which is that Getbig thrives on whiners. Without us, there would be no Getbig....as we know it.

Better still, how about enjoying a glass of high quality wine.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Teutonic Knight on March 17, 2021, 10:55:21 PM
can you post some actual facts or is that another one of those things you imagined and now believe is true?

and no I don't see any correlation between gay marriage and the degredation of our society

go ahead and post those facts too


homo detected , o mama mia fascist grandpa would clip you
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 06:19:04 AM
Straw can't go out in public without people shoving tampons in his mouth.  Fuck the twatlette.
;D :D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 06:25:29 AM
Marvel Comics unveils its first gay Captain America: The iconic superhero gets an LGBTQ+ makeover in new comic book coming out just in time for Pride month as company pushes for more diverse characters
UK Daily Mail ^ | March 17, 2021 | Andrew Court

Marvel Comics has unveiled its very first gay Captain America.

The character, named Aaron Fischer, will feature in The United States of Captain America - a new comic book series set for release on June 2.

Marvel released images of Fischer on Wednesday, touting him as the first openly queer character in Captain America's 80-year history.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


More hollywood filth. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 18, 2021, 07:34:14 AM
Marvel Comics unveils its first gay Captain America: The iconic superhero gets an LGBTQ+ makeover in new comic book coming out just in time for Pride month as company pushes for more diverse characters
UK Daily Mail ^ | March 17, 2021 | Andrew Court

Marvel Comics has unveiled its very first gay Captain America.

The character, named Aaron Fischer, will feature in The United States of Captain America - a new comic book series set for release on June 2.

Marvel released images of Fischer on Wednesday, touting him as the first openly queer character in Captain America's 80-year history.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


More hollywood filth.

Nothing filthy about capitalizing on a market.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 07:48:45 AM
Nothing filthy about capitalizing on a market.

1-3% of the population? 

No thanks.   Not patronizing this nonsense. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 18, 2021, 07:54:35 AM
1-3% of the population? 

No thanks.   Not patronizing this nonsense.

That's the beauty of capitalism in a free society and market.  You don't have to patronize anything you don't want to, and, at the same time, you can provide goods and services to any niche market you choose and get filthy rich or choose not to.  Also, if you already own a company and you have the foresight to see an opportunity to profit from a niche market you can choose to do so and get more filthy rich.

You gotta love freedom in American, don't you?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Johnholmes on March 18, 2021, 07:57:06 AM
Nothing filthy about capitalizing on a market.
Nothing filthy about a big cock  ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 07:59:28 AM
That's the beauty of capitalism in a free society and market.  You don't have to patronize anything you don't want to, and, at the same time, you can provide goods and services to any niche market you choose and get filthy rich or choose not to.  Also, if you already own a company and you have the foresight to see an opportunity to profit from a niche market you can choose to do so and get more filthy rich.

You gotta love freedom in American, don't you?

Yes - exactly.

Personally I'm sick and tired of this mamby pamby bs.   Who the F cares is someone is gay, trans, etc? 

If I were a gay person, I would not want my entire identity wrapped up in the fact of who I am attracted to. 

So I like chicks w big ass and boobs - is that all anyone gonna think of me?  I hope not.  I imagine many gay people feel the same way. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: OzmO on March 18, 2021, 08:18:44 AM
Yes - exactly.

Personally I'm sick and tired of this mamby pamby bs.   Who the F cares is someone is gay, trans, etc? 

If I were a gay person, I would not want my entire identity wrapped up in the fact of who I am attracted to. 

So I like chicks w big ass and boobs - is that all anyone gonna think of me?  I hope not.  I imagine many gay people feel the same way.

agreed. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: residue on March 18, 2021, 09:11:59 AM
1-3% of the population? 

No thanks.   Not patronizing this nonsense.
were you buying comic books before this?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: residue on March 18, 2021, 09:13:06 AM
Yes - exactly.

Personally I'm sick and tired of this mamby pamby bs.   Who the F cares is someone is gay, trans, etc? 

If I were a gay person, I would not want my entire identity wrapped up in the fact of who I am attracted to. 

So I like chicks w big ass and boobs - is that all anyone gonna think of me?  I hope not.  I imagine many gay people feel the same way.

well being gay and trans are different things. sexuality and identity aren't the same, you understand the difference right?
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 09:29:49 AM
well being gay and trans are different things. sexuality and identity aren't the same, you understand the difference right?

No , I'm dum.   ;)  :D  ;)  ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: residue on March 18, 2021, 09:55:06 AM
No , I'm dum.   ;)  :D  ;)  ;D

we know
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 09:59:20 AM
we know

 ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 18, 2021, 12:42:39 PM
 :D ;D

Women can't even win a damn female beauty pagent!   LMFAO!!!! 


Biological male wins female beauty pageant in Nevada
The Blaze ^ | March 18, 2021 | Phil Shiver




'A celebration of womanhood and diversity'

A transgender person is now one step closer to being crowned Miss USA.

Kataluna Enriquez, a biological male, won the Miss Silver State USA pageant this week, an event considered the biggest preliminary competition for the Miss Nevada USA pageant, KVVU-TV reported.

The outlet called it a "monumental win" for Enriquez, who will now move on to the statewide competition in the pageant circuit that leads to Miss USA and, eventually, the Miss Universe competition.

The pageants, collectively run by the Miss Universe Organization, were once owned by former President Donald Trump and are widely recognized for awarding among the most coveted crowns in the pageant world.

In an interview with the local news outlet after the victory, Enriquez called the experience "a celebration of womanhood and diversity and this celebration of being your true self."

But Enriquez noted that she has not always been so well liked in the pageant world. She recalled at a previous pageant, which she chose not to name in the report, when event organizers found out she was a transgender, they required her to provide medical documents to prove she was female. The organizers also allegedly refused to assign her a roommate.

"I was asked to provide documents that were invasive in my opinion physically asking me to get a letter from my doctor," Enriquez said. "It brought me back to a time where I felt like I was not welcome."

But according to KVVU-TV, Enriquez said instead of shying away from her transgender identity based on past experiences she has decided to make "awareness of the transgender community" her pageant platform.

That message evidently resonated in the Miss Silver State USA pageant and may prove to benefit Enriquez in upcoming competitions, especially as transgenderism gains popularity in progressive circles and pressure mounts to avoid even the slightest appearance of discrimination.

Over the last few years, pageant organizations have started to receive entries from more and more biological males and have been hit with backlash upon denying the participants from competing.

In 2018, Angela Ponce, winner of that year's Miss Universe Spain pageant, was at one point the favorite to be crowned Miss Universe.

The Miss Nevada USA pageant is scheduled for June, according to the report.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: residue on March 18, 2021, 02:06:17 PM
:D ;D

Women can't even win a damn female beauty pagent!   LMFAO!!!! 


Biological male wins female beauty pageant in Nevada
The Blaze ^ | March 18, 2021 | Phil Shiver




'A celebration of womanhood and diversity'

A transgender person is now one step closer to being crowned Miss USA.

Kataluna Enriquez, a biological male, won the Miss Silver State USA pageant this week, an event considered the biggest preliminary competition for the Miss Nevada USA pageant, KVVU-TV reported.

The outlet called it a "monumental win" for Enriquez, who will now move on to the statewide competition in the pageant circuit that leads to Miss USA and, eventually, the Miss Universe competition.

The pageants, collectively run by the Miss Universe Organization, were once owned by former President Donald Trump and are widely recognized for awarding among the most coveted crowns in the pageant world.

In an interview with the local news outlet after the victory, Enriquez called the experience "a celebration of womanhood and diversity and this celebration of being your true self."

But Enriquez noted that she has not always been so well liked in the pageant world. She recalled at a previous pageant, which she chose not to name in the report, when event organizers found out she was a transgender, they required her to provide medical documents to prove she was female. The organizers also allegedly refused to assign her a roommate.

"I was asked to provide documents that were invasive in my opinion physically asking me to get a letter from my doctor," Enriquez said. "It brought me back to a time where I felt like I was not welcome."

But according to KVVU-TV, Enriquez said instead of shying away from her transgender identity based on past experiences she has decided to make "awareness of the transgender community" her pageant platform.

That message evidently resonated in the Miss Silver State USA pageant and may prove to benefit Enriquez in upcoming competitions, especially as transgenderism gains popularity in progressive circles and pressure mounts to avoid even the slightest appearance of discrimination.

Over the last few years, pageant organizations have started to receive entries from more and more biological males and have been hit with backlash upon denying the participants from competing.

In 2018, Angela Ponce, winner of that year's Miss Universe Spain pageant, was at one point the favorite to be crowned Miss Universe.

The Miss Nevada USA pageant is scheduled for June, according to the report.
no shame in losing to this
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/425a5691a89c6b183d64aee2df7a23d4/tumblr_p8ufb1cuDL1us6vl5o1_1280.jpg)

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/36/f9/a0/36f9a00ff8186d2eaf4d05b8f481ada2.png)
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on March 19, 2021, 01:46:43 PM
Blurring the line between boys and girls to cause as much confusion in our youth as possible. Making it socially unacceptable to speak out against this is the medias job. The media is our enemy.

Whi cares
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: The Scott on March 19, 2021, 06:24:34 PM
Whi cares

One can see where you're coming from being that you got buttfucked by the Queen Vissyfishy.
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5d/4e/cc/5d4ecc2145f7153a09b44759319784fe.jpg)
Your motto must be "Anything goes, so longs as we cums".

Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 19, 2021, 06:54:18 PM
One can see where you're coming from being that you got buttfucked by the Queen Vissyfishy.
(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5d/4e/cc/5d4ecc2145f7153a09b44759319784fe.jpg)
Your motto must be "Anything goes, so longs as we cums".

VVV does the fucking in all his relationships.  Gay, straight, married guy at Popeyes.  It makes no difference to the sausage king of NC. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 19, 2021, 09:12:35 PM
No secret here that I am a flaming (no homo) liberal.  Can someone from each side chime in and tell me why I am right and/or wrong about the following:

I am pro trans, pro gay, etc.  You get the drift.  But, I don't think I like the idea of someone with a penis using the same bathroom as my daughter.  Now, if that penis has been reconstructed into a vagina I am probably ok with it. 

Sports:  Again, if you have a penis you should not be playing girls sports in my opinion.  That being said, if you were born with a penis and have it removed, I'm still not sure that you should be able to play in female sports.  For instance, if my son lopped off his cock and wanted to play on a girls hockey team instead of a boys team, I would think that unfair.  Perhaps if the sex change operation took place before puberty, than maybe that's different?

Some fellow liberals reflexively take the woke side in this debate.  For me, it's far from a slam dunk. 

Also, do sex change operations take place on minors legally?  If so, I'm not sure that I'm ok with that either.  My niece at about 12 years of age thought she was meant to be a boy.  Butch hair cut, clothes, etc.  She actually shared her feelings with her parents.  Now, at 16 she has a boyfriend (for about a year) and her hair is long again and that seems to be a distant memory.  I'd hate to see something done at such a young age that could not be easily undone.

I . . . think . . . I . . . agree . . . with . . . you.    :o
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Dos Equis on March 19, 2021, 09:15:50 PM
Yes - exactly.

Personally I'm sick and tired of this mamby pamby bs.   Who the F cares is someone is gay, trans, etc? 

If I were a gay person, I would not want my entire identity wrapped up in the fact of who I am attracted to. 

So I like chicks w big ass and boobs - is that all anyone gonna think of me?  I hope not.  I imagine many gay people feel the same way.

I agree.  I could care less about anyone's sexual orientation or preference.  Consenting adults should have the right to live however they choose.  I do business with people who happen to be gay, have gay friends, one gay in-law that I know of, etc.  Doesn't make a hill of beans difference to me.  I don't treat them any differently than anyone else. 

But this transgender, throw science/biology out the window thing, particularly as it relates to kids, is a bridge too far for me. 
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: AbrahamG on March 19, 2021, 11:38:48 PM
I . . . think . . . I . . . agree . . . with . . . you.    :o

What...the...fuck...is.. .this...world...coming.. .to?
 ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: The Scott on March 20, 2021, 10:39:16 AM
VVV does the fucking in all his relationships.  Gay, straight, married guy at Popeyes.  It makes no difference to the sausage king of NC.

He may sometimes talk the talk but in the end that's where he gets it.  He's a physically flaccid nellie.

But calling him the sausage king of NC is pretty damn funny!  ;D
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Primemuscle on March 20, 2021, 11:44:57 AM
I agree.  I could care less about anyone's sexual orientation or preference.  Consenting adults should have the right to live however they choose.  I do business with people who happen to be gay, have gay friends, one gay in-law that I know of, etc.  Doesn't make a hill of beans difference to me.  I don't treat them any differently than anyone else. 

But this transgender, throw science/biology out the window thing, particularly as it relates to kids, is a bridge too far for me.

Transgenderism is a tough thing to deal with. Both for those who are or think they are and for the rest of us who have difficultly relating to it. I cannot imagine thinking I was a woman trapped in a man's body or vise versa. Moreover, surgically and hormonally altering one's body to become a different gender seems outrageous and wrong to me. I've often wondered if it is a form of hysteria, where someone becomes so fixated on changing their gender they feel they can't survive unless they do.

Rearranging the toy department to make it gender neutral isn't going to cause a kid think they should be a different gender. Most kids gravitate to the the same toys their friends play with anyway. In my opinion parents would do well to just let their kids be kids.
Title: Re: California would ban boys and girls sections at big retailers under proposed law
Post by: Soul Crusher on March 20, 2021, 11:59:54 AM
VVV does the fucking in all his relationships.  Gay, straight, married guy at Popeyes.  It makes no difference to the sausage king of NC.


Lol !