Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: jerseysilverback on June 26, 2021, 08:07:10 PM

Title: Can a drug be considered "Right Wing"
Post by: jerseysilverback on June 26, 2021, 08:07:10 PM

Another great article on how MSM and big tech are willing to let thousands die rather than let the news out that a cheap readily available drug (Ivermectin), could greatly reduce Covid suffering.  Cracks are starting to appear in the left's effort to suppress this news.  Dr. Pierre Kory was on the Joe Rogan Experience this week, the most followed podcast in the US.   History should not be kind to those who are suppressing this information solely for political or financial reasons.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/ivermectin-can-drug-be-right-wing

Title: Re: Can a drug be considered "Right Wing"
Post by: Body-Buildah on June 27, 2021, 02:25:43 AM

Drugs are racist, trees are racist, ID's are racist, Math is racist, .

Everything the looney left opposes, is "racissssssssssssssssssss t"?!!

(https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-mpJUoPd35oQ%2FUshR9k3QNPI%2FAAAAAAAABZw%2FhoWcqjMWaco%2Fs1600%2Fliberal-life-cycle-small.jpg&f=1&nofb=1)

Title: Re: Can a drug be considered "Right Wing"
Post by: Humble Narcissist on June 27, 2021, 02:54:55 AM

Pharmaceutical companies can make much more money with vaccines.

Title: Re: Can a drug be considered "Right Wing"
Post by: wes on June 27, 2021, 02:58:04 AM

All this = is G=R=E=E=D !!

Title: Re: Can a drug be considered "Right Wing"
Post by: IroNat on June 27, 2021, 04:32:04 AM

Quote from: wes on June 27, 2021, 02:58:04 AM

All this = is G=R=E=E=D !!

(https://media4.giphy.com/media/xTiN0ye8BRaXVcPMmA/giphy.webp?cid=6c09b952378f23004cc937215d9f84772e29217e0c75ac23&rid=giphy.webp&ct=g)

Title: Re: Can a drug be considered "Right Wing"
Post by: Tapeworm on June 27, 2021, 07:42:35 AM

The Mexican and Indian experiences are certainly compelling. I would have liked to hear a pharacokinetic explanation of what Ivermectin does, particularly since they claimed it helps against the virus as well as vaccine injury. Even if I struggled to follow it, it would have been out there for debate. Maybe they wanted to keep it bro-accessible.

I'm convinced that there is a push to silence or discredit people advocating for treatments and prophylactics other than vaccination. Whether that is a continuation of previous, possibly justifiable policies to censor bullshit or a consciously sinister initiative of some global cabal is hard to say. That reputable, credentialed people are being shut down for discussing out-of-bounds topics is established.

Potentially valid inquiries, which Ivermectin sure seems to warrant, are getting dismissed alongside absurdist Q horseshit and filed with the same. That's a problem. It also causes people like me, who witness this, to question the validity of a sanctioned approach which appears to be shielded from criticism and disingenuously presented as the sole and necessary solution.

Transparency and open discussion fosters trust. If you want people to mistrust you, censor opposing voices and quash discussion.

Weinstein's Dark Horse podcast is mirrored plenty and available. Just not on YouTube. #84 is entitled Hey YouTube: Divide By Zero.  ;D