Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on July 12, 2021, 08:27:55 PM
-
https://rumble.com/vjpceh-this-could-be-tuckers-most-important-monologue-yet.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab&fbclid=IwAR2VlrfbguK6kFGzWfXlW0r9WnsHwNKz1eLl4G-Lw6vtlCToE6diicqQZWM
-
https://rumble.com/vjpceh-this-could-be-tuckers-most-important-monologue-yet.html?mref=22lbp&mc=56yab&fbclid=IwAR2VlrfbguK6kFGzWfXlW0r9WnsHwNKz1eLl4G-Lw6vtlCToE6diicqQZWM
Outstanding. And this is why he crushes the competition.
Easy to forget things like Spygate, falsely accusing Kavanaugh of being a gang rapist, falsely accusing the Covington Catholic kids of harassment, censoring true stories about Hunter Biden (even in private messages), etc. Crazy.
-
Nothing Tucker says is important
-
Nothing Tucker says is important to mindless libturdz, since it hurts their sensitive kvnt feelings.
Fixed
-
Good post, Coach.
-
This sums things up well, especially how post election, the truth was mixed with wild conspiracy theories, which gave fodder for those who were happy with the election to discredit any notion of fraud.
If anyone was interested in real discussion here, it would be nice if a leftist poster would go through the video and let everyone know what points they agree and disagree with.
-
Outstanding. And this is why he crushes the competition.
Easy to forget things like Spygate, falsely accusing Kavanaugh of being a gang rapist, falsely accusing the Covington Catholic kids of harassment, censoring true stories about Hunter Biden (even in private messages), etc. Crazy.
I actually saw this when I was on the gym treadmill doing cardio.
It's a political OPINION piece.
Granted, Tucker speaks well and has a well organized presentation.
BUT, he makes too many "conclusions" that aren't an objective "cause and effect " relationship.
Just having more people voting absentee doesn't mean a certain % are likely fraudulent ballots.
To actually hold up in court, you need clear evidence of fraud.
In simple terms many of his conclusions are based on his version of "common sense".
-
I actually saw this when I was on the gym treadmill doing cardio.
It's a political OPINION piece.
Granted, Tucker speaks well and has a well organized presentation.
BUT, he makes too many "conclusions" that aren't an objective "cause and effect " relationship.
Just having more people voting absentee doesn't mean a certain % are likely fraudulent ballots.
To actually hold up in court, you need clear evidence of fraud.
In simple terms many of his conclusions are based on his version of "common sense".
Obviously, it's a political opinion monologue. But he mentions specific facts, none of which you addressed. Because you're a garden variety liberal who doesn't care about the facts.
-
Obviously, it's a political opinion monologue. But he mentions specific facts, none of which you addressed. Because you're a garden variety liberal who doesn't care about the facts.
I simply reached a different conclusion then you and some here.
Like anyone else, I try to stay informed and make up my own mind.
FYI, in the mid term elections, I plan to vote for my republican Gov, Lt Gov and Sec of state along with some dems.
It's ludicrous for anyone to claim being an independent if they refuse to vote for anyone in the other party.
Question - How many of your votes will be for the "other " party?
-
I simply reached a different conclusion then you and some here.
Like anyone else, I try to stay informed and make up my own mind.
FYI, in the mid term elections, I plan to vote for my republican Gov, Lt Gov and Sec of state along with some dems.
It's ludicrous for anyone to claim being an independent if they refuse to vote for anyone in the other party.
Question - How many of your votes will be for the "other " party?
Oh BS. Yeah you reached a different conclusion. So Kavanaugh really is a gang rapist. The Covington Catholic boys really did harass that Native American activist. Those are specific facts addressed in Tucker's monologue. But I doubt you watched it. ::)
Nobody cares about your purported political credentials.
-
Oh BS. Yeah you reached a different conclusion. So Kavanaugh really is a gang rapist. The Covington Catholic boys really did harass that Native American activist. Those are specific facts addressed in Tucker's monologue. But I doubt you watched it. ::)
Nobody cares about your purported political credentials.
I actually agreed with Tucker and the side of the Catholic Boys.
They did nothing wrong to the native American. They edited in a brief cocky look on one teen boy, big deal.
I agreed with Tucker when he had the McCloskey's who were armed to protect their home from trespassing "protestors".
I've agreed with Tucker on several things over the years.
I just don't agree with his conclusions on this 2020 election issue. FYI, obviously there are other things I don't agree with him on.
Just because I don't AGREE with everything he says, doesn't mean I don't always watch or enjoy his show. I do.
You'd have to be a brain dead cult member to agree with everything some news show host said .
After Tucker, I tend to watch Maddow over on MSNBC. I don't always agree with her either, but she tells a good news story.
Unlike most people, I like to LISTEN to BOTH sides of the debate. 100% serious
-
I actually agreed with Tucker and the side of the Catholic Boys.
They did nothing wrong to the native American. They edited in a brief cocky look on one teen boy, big deal.
I agreed with Tucker when he had the McCloskey's who were armed to protect their home from trespassing "protestors".
I've agreed with Tucker on several things over the years.
I just don't agree with his conclusions on this 2020 election issue. FYI, obviously there are other things I don't agree with him on.
Just because I don't AGREE with everything he says, doesn't mean I don't always watch or enjoy his show. I do.
You'd have to be a brain dead cult member to agree with everything some news show host said .
After Tucker, I tend to watch Maddow over on MSNBC. I don't always agree with her either, but she tells a good news story.
Unlike most people, I like to LISTEN to BOTH sides of the debate. 100% serious
I've read enough of your posts on this board, including the ones you deleted, to say you have a warped view of your ability to listen to both sides.
And the fact you cannot tell the difference between hard news and opinion is telling. Both Tucker and Maddow are opinion shows. So no, Maddow does not tell a "news story."
-
Nothing Tucker says is important
Over juiced ,again ::)
-
I've read enough of your posts on this board, including the ones you deleted, to say you have a warped view of your ability to listen to both sides.
And the fact you cannot tell the difference between hard news and opinion is telling. Both Tucker and Maddow are opinion shows. So no, Maddow does not tell a "news story."
Fair point but...
LOL, I'd be the first one to admit having my own personal bias that affects my judgement .
But , that's TRUE with every human on earth.
I ENJOY watching both Tucker and Maddow.
Plus ,I gain a little insight into both sides of the top political issues of the day.
You and some others won't always agree with my political opinions.
I don't EXPECT everything to agree with my OPINIONS on a politics forum.
With me, you don't need to click "LIKE" to avoid being a "hater" ;)
At least, I TRY to stay polite or use my goofy humor to make a point.
If nothing else, I don't mouth the party line and make up my own mind on individual issues.
Now, my top issues are health care and the environment. Those 2 have the greatest influence on my vote.
-
Tucker destroyed Pence full blast