Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Kwon on November 19, 2021, 09:05:37 PM

Title: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: Kwon on November 19, 2021, 09:05:37 PM
https://news.yahoo.com/kenosha-hopes-calm-kyle-rittenhouse-014803668.html

Rittenhouse trial could be the 'pendulum swinging' back after George Floyd, expert says


(https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/4263/hgLaTY.gif)
(https://i.redd.it/slw9pmsaba831.png)
(https://media.giphy.com/media/l10RJERvk3i5joqMDC/giphy.gif)
(https://i.imgur.com/lFQYoup.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/BryiFCW.jpg)
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: Humble Narcissist on November 20, 2021, 03:03:06 AM
There never should have even been a trial.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: BlackMetallic on November 20, 2021, 04:04:25 AM
There never should have even been a trial.

This ^^^^
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: IroNat on November 20, 2021, 05:21:10 AM
Riots just beginning.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: SweetDaddySiki on November 20, 2021, 06:11:39 AM
There never should have even been a trial.

Logical if true
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: oldtimer1 on November 20, 2021, 06:25:52 AM
Floyd was a career criminal and certified scumbag. No one seems to mention his home invasion and pointing of his gun at a pregnant woman's belly when looking at his statues. He was on a ton of drugs his final arrest. Enough to be fatal. Fuck him.

Rittenhouse used self defense. Liberals want to know they can riot in safety now that they got the cops to stand down and be observers  instead of cracking heads.  Now they have guys willing to defend them self and that's a threat they want eliminated as they arson, assault, loot, vandalize, murder and stop traffic. 
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 20, 2021, 11:21:47 AM
There never should have even been a trial.

Obvious self defense which was confirmed in the trial.  Nothing but a bullshit political prosecution and an attempt to criminalize self defense.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on November 22, 2021, 04:27:22 AM
Obvious self defense which was confirmed in the trial.  Nothing but a bullshit political prosecution and an attempt to criminalize self defense.


Wrong.  Self defense wasn’t confirmed.  What happened was the prosecution couldn’t prove the claim he was an active shooter. The onus is on the prosecution and not the defense to prove the claim. 
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: f450 on November 22, 2021, 09:23:07 AM
Wrong.  Self defense wasn’t confirmed.  What happened was the prosecution couldn’t prove the claim he was an active shooter. The onus is on the prosecution and not the defense to prove the claim.

Wrong. Self defense wasn't not confirmed either. Prosecution couldn't prove that he was not defending himself or that he provoked the attack.

He sent a  pedophile who was convicted of raping pre-teen boys to hell. The country owes him a debt for that. I am generally anti capital punishment but I make an exception for the pedo. Feeding them to alligators would be too kind.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: youandme on November 22, 2021, 09:46:36 AM
Wrong.  Self defense wasn’t confirmed.  What happened was the prosecution couldn’t prove the claim he was an active shooter. The onus is on the prosecution and not the defense to prove the claim.
Self defense was proven. The defense carried that burden and jury agreed. Prosecutor saw the case as not a self defense case. But the videos should have probably told the prosecutor that self defense would prevail given a trial.
Rittenhouse has words with them, victim fired a shot in the air, chase ensued. Rittenhouse fired his gun.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on November 22, 2021, 10:54:24 AM
Self defense was proven. The defense carried that burden and jury agreed. Prosecutor saw the case as not a self defense case. But the videos should have probably told the prosecutor that self defense would prevail given a trial.
Rittenhouse has words with them, victim fired a shot in the air, chase ensued. Rittenhouse fired his gun.

Nope.  the jury felt the prosecution couldn't prove without a reasonable doubt that he was there as an active shooter with intent to kill.  That was what they had to decide on.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 22, 2021, 10:59:37 AM
Innocent until proven guilty has always been my understanding.
Title: Re: Rittenhouse Floyd
Post by: funk51 on November 22, 2021, 11:11:12 AM