Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Matt on January 02, 2022, 01:37:13 AM
-
Updated Canadian COVID Death and Hospitalization Data [REF: Public Health Agency of Canada - see attachments]:
Read the *parts in bold only* to see how ridiculous the numbers are - if you want the supporting evidence proving my claims to be true, read the rest of the information here.
2021-12-30, 7PM EST:
- 30,042 deaths.
- 18,701 ICU admissions.
- 96,349 hospitalizations.
^ In TOTAL in ALL OF CANADA, since the PANDEMIC START.
^^ Please note that there are over 1,200 hospitals in Canada [references below].
https://www.statista.com/statistics/440923/total-number-of-hospital-establishments-in-canada-by-province/
So divide the ICU and hospitalization numbers by 1,200 to get the numbers *per hospital*:
We are on Day 709 of the pandemic. Fully 708 days / 101 weeks have passed, since Canada's first case of 2020-01-25, when a man in Toronto tested positive for Covid-19, after arriving in Canada from Wuhan, China.
The data here covers 706 days, from 2020-01-25 through to 2021-12-30.
Now let's do the math:
- There have been 15.58 ICU admissions per hospital in 706 days [18,701 admissions spread over 1,200 hospitals] = one additional ICU admission PER HOSPITAL every 45.3 days [ONE additional ICU patient PER HOSPITAL every 6.5 weeks in all of Canada!]
- There have been 80.3 additional hospitalizations per hospital [96,349 hospitalizations spread over 1,200 hospitals] = one additional hospitalization PER HOSPITAL every 8.8 days [which works out to 3-4 additional hospitalizations PER HOSPITAL PER MONTH, in all of Canada, with a "hospitalization" being defined as either a hospital stay of over 8 or 24 hours - my nurse friend from the TBRHSC says >24 hours].
Deaths:
Canada's population is 38,247,166.
Therefore, 1 in 1,273 died.
82.3% of deaths [24,720 of 30,042] were people aged 70+.
92.8% of deaths [27,887 of 30,042] were people aged 60+.
97.3% of deaths [29,221 of 30,042] were people aged 50+.
98.9% of deaths [29,707 of 30,042] were people aged 40+.
As said, 1 in 1,273 people died, and 82.3% who died were 70+, as per the data above [24,720 of 30,042 deaths in the 70+ group].
So only ~0.2 per ~1,273 Canadians who died were under age 70.
= 1 per 7,186.6.
Put another way:
For every 7,187 Canadians, ONE person under age *70* has died, thus far in nearly two years of this alleged *lethal pandemic*.
That works out to 14 Canadians under age 70 dying per 100,000 population, over *nearly two years* since this hyped pandemic started.
So COVID has killed 7 Canadians per year per city/population of 100,000 people, since this pandemic started, almost two years ago.
Now factor in underlying conditions:
In the USA, 94% of those who died had not one - but 2-3 underlying conditions on average [26 comorbidities per 10 decedents, 2.6 on average, REF: CDC, August 2020, reported here by Coach].
In Canada, where less data is available, the numbers that have been released show at least 80% of those who died had underlying health conditions.
Now factor in obesity:
In the USA, 78% of those who died were overweight or obese [REF: CDC]
So now do the math:
- Fewer than 7 per 100,000 population per year under age 70 have died of COVID in Canada, since this pandemic started in Canada on 2020-01-25.
- Over 80% have health conditions, which means fewer than 1.4 per 100,000 Canadians per year have died who are both [1] under age 70, [2] who had no health conditions have died of COVID [7 per 500,000].
- As there is substantial overlap between obesity and having health conditions, I have no way of knowing what percentage of the people who died who did not have health conditions were obese or not...but my suspicion is that almost all people who died who were not elderly or with health conditions were MORBIDLY obese.
^ Did you wonder why you haven't noticed anyone dying of COVID?
Because, with all due respect:
NO ONE WHO ISN'T MORBIDLY OBESE OR A DINOSAUR IS DYING OF COVID.
I'm flabbergasted that literally EVERYONE was taken in my this bollocks, lol. Literally 99% of people at Wal-Mart at any time in my city are still wearing masks! LOL @ the number of people taken in by this scam.
Here's another way to look at these numbers:
As you can clearly see from the mortality data posted below, only 5,322 Canadians under age 70 have died so far [5,322 of 30,042 total deaths].
5,322 per 38,247,166 Canadian population, over nearly two years of experiencing this "lethal pandemic".
So only one person under age 70 have died per 7,187 Canadians - but that's in almost two years.
Now when you consider that over 80% of these people had MULTIPLE underlying health conditions...we get to this bombshell:
Fewer than 1,000 Canadians who died were both under age 70, and had no health conditions.
Now if you take that <1,000 of the 5,322 Canadians under age 70 who died, of the 30,042 total Canadian deaths, assuming the Canadian data is anything remotely close to the Canadian data:
Around 80% were overweight or obese, or had MULTIPLE underlying health conditions.
38.2% [1,334 of 3,489] were aged 60-69.
So - what - maybe 80% of 2,155 TOTAL NUMBER OF CANADIANS UNDER AGE 60 WHO DIED, had underlying health conditions, or were obese?
So possibly as many as 420 Canadians under age 60 died, who were both in good health AND weren't morbidly obese?
420 people?
420 people in a nation of over 38.2M, with over 28.5M being in that age group?
Why would ANYONE:
Under age 70.
Not obese.
With no health conditions.
Be worried about this pandemic?
The bottom line is that only 3,489 Canadians under age 70 have died so far - NEARLY TWO YEARS INTO THIS THING.
Only 2,155 Canadians under age 60 have died.
2,155 of 28,557,431 in that under 60 age range!
An American nurse told me that private American hospitals received $13,000 for every death they reported as being COVID. Does anyone know if that is true?
-
Now let's do an analysis on vaccines.
VACCINES:
By 2020-12-26, 46,156 received at least one vaccine dose...so...Canada was pretty well unvaccinated in 2020.
By 2021-12-16 [one year later], 81.79% of Canada's TOTAL population have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
By 2020-12-18, 76.49%, [or 29,253,025 Canadians] were fully vaccinated.
So in 2020, in the 334 days that Covid-19 was [1] confirmed to be in Canada, and [2] part of the reporting dates, we had 14,642 deaths.
In 2021, in the 357 days that COVID and/or variants were included in the reporting deaths, we had 14,473 deaths.
Unfortunately, I don't have the end of year data for hospitalizations and ICU admissions.
I do have the data for 2021-02-12 - here are the updated Canadian totals spread over 1,200+ Canadian hospitals as of that date in February, 2021:
45,057 hospitalizations.
8,005 ICU admissions.
Here is the updated data, as of 2021-12-30:
96,349 hospitalizations
18,701 ICU admissions.
^ I don't even know what to make of that.
I
From the *6-day* period from 21-12-24 to 21-12-30, Canada has had:
- 129 additional deaths.
- 195 additional ICU admissions.
- 1,325 additional hospitalizations.
So the average in the first 700 days [through to 2021-12-24] works out to 135.75 hospitalizations per week [95,024÷700] PER HOSPITAL, as per the data above.
Meanwhile in the six days between those dates [2021-12-24 through to 2021-12-30]:
We've had 1,325 additional hospitalizations [96,349 - 95,024, via data above], which works out to 220.83 [1,325÷6] per day.
So we had 85.08 additional hospitalizations [220.83 - 135.75] from 12-24 to 12-30.
Gee...does Covid-19 has a seasonality to it...you know...like a FLU?
Next - ICU admissions and deaths [2021-12-30]:
- 18,701 ICU patients, up from 18,505 [on 21-12-24]
- 30,042 deaths, up from 29,913.
That's 196 additional ICU patients, and 129 additional deaths, over that 6-day period. That's [doing the math in my head]: 32.67 ICU patients per day, and 21.5 deaths per day [from 12-24 to 12-30].
Now, let's view the averages for the first 700 days of the pandemic, from 2020-01-25 to 2021-12-24:
- 26.44 ICU patients per day [18505÷700].
- 42.73 deaths per day [29913÷700].
So we are UP by 6.23 ICU patients per day, and deaths are still over 50% the average [21.5 / 42.73] = 50.31%.
And vaccinated people are not just the majority of cases, they are *overrepresented based on their percentage of the population*.
Happy New Year - and enjoy your boosters.
-
I'm editing my original post for brevity...I just wanted to post it in case I accidentally lost it.
OAK:
Why are you afraid of a virus with a >99.9% survival rate among healthy people? ???
-
(https://c.tenor.com/XgaU95K_XiwAAAAC/kermit-typing.gif)
-
My nikka
-
(https://c.tenor.com/XgaU95K_XiwAAAAC/kermit-typing.gif)
There's some overlap I have to edit out.
When I finish the edit, check the bolded parts only, for the most absurd facts - for example, in Canada, 2,155 of 28,557,431 Canadians under age 60 have died. So 99.992% of Canadians under 60 have survived this "lethal pandemic" so far.
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Oh brother...take your face diapers off already!
-
This is the most survivable pandemic in world history.
-
This is the most survivable pandemic in world history.
Great post. Even I am consistently flabbergasted at how crazy it is how NOT lethal this pandemic/virus is - and I am used to knowing how COMPLETELY INSANE the reporting has been.
The Spanish Flu infected 33% of the population, and killed between 2-5% of the entire population.
This pandemic has infected 3.6% of the population [285M cases among 7.9B people], and killed 0.07% of the world population [5.44M deaths from a 7.9B works population].
The ONLY pandemic that over 99.93% of the world population survived!
The ONLY pandemic where the world population WENT UP by 200 million people.
LOL.
This virus has to be made in a lab. That explains why it did such a bad job killing people.
I'll ask this again:
DOES ANYONE HERE KNOW ANY HEALTHY NON-OBESE PERSON UNDER AGE 70-65-60 [ISH] WHO DIED FROM THIS VIRUS?
DOES EVEN ONE PERSON HERE PERSONALLY KNOW OF ONE PERSON WHO MEETS THAT PROFILE???
LOL, check out this lying fuck:
-
^ The main points are written in bold, which show how absurd everything is. The rest of what I write is just to back up my points.
If I'm counting right...Canada has 1,265 hospitals.
So we've had 18,701 ICU admissions spread over 1,265 hospitals, spread over TWO YEARS.
HOW THE FUCK IS THAT "OVERWHELMED"??
HOW SHITTY IS CANADIAN HEALTHCARE FOR THAT TO BE OVERWHELMING???
That's 14.8 additional ICU admissions per Canadian hospital over nearly TWO YEARS.
That's ONE additional ICU admission PER CANADIAN HOSPITAL EVERY 47.8 DAYS [almost seven weeks].
AGAIN - HOW THE FUCK IS THAT OVERWHELMED?
Is Canada's healthcare SO BAD that we can't even handle ONE ADDITIONAL ICU PATIENT PER HOSPITAL EVERY TWO MONTHS???
OAK: as a "medical professional", can you explain that?
-
^ Admits hospitalization rates are flat, admits patients who are ALREADY in hospital and screened for COVID are being reported as COVID hospitalizations [including times where they have COMPLETELY SEPARATE SYMPTOMS].
Most aren't getting sick even with cases rising.
Doctors just have to start growing balls in order to admit the truth.
It's over.
-
You really think they don't have this covered, do you? You forgot the 4th forgotten group.
The Department of State Hospitals is facing pressure in federal court to speed up admissions of mentally ill COVID patients. If you are feeling stressed and anxious and have an overwhelming feeling of loneliness, they can admit you with a Covid DX if you are positive.
Psychiatric Patients.
This group would include young people, prisoners, the homeless, etc. This is the young and fit group they keep talking about on the news, so go your get shots and boosters.
Really, I didn't make this up.
Get your time capsule and remember the AIDs epidemic. Stress (mental) was one of the leading causes of wasting disease.
-
Well done, Matt.
-
Great post at Matt.
A couple of friends have tested positive for the wuflu. They got tested as they were all in contact with other positive cases. Interesting part is that all of them (4 people) did not even know they were ill until someone from public health told them so. 2 were vaccinated 2 are not . all in the same age group.
-
I'm editing my original post for brevity...I just wanted to post it in case I accidentally lost it.
OAK:
Why are you afraid of a virus with a >99.9% survival rate among healthy people? ???
That's a LOWER survival rate that ANY other single disease in North America.
Also, because I'm not selfish and don't just care about myself, I want to AVOID spreading the virus to others.
8) 8) 8)
-
Updated Canadian COVID Death and Hospitalization Data [REF: Public Health Agency of Canada - see attachments]:
Read the *parts in bold only* to see how ridiculous the numbers are - if you want the supporting evidence proving my claims to be true, read the rest of the information here.
2021-12-30, 7PM EST:
- 30,042 deaths.
- 18,701 ICU admissions.
- 96,349 hospitalizations.
^ In TOTAL in ALL OF CANADA, since the PANDEMIC START.
^^ Please note that there are over 1,200 hospitals in Canada [references below].
https://www.statista.com/statistics/440923/total-number-of-hospital-establishments-in-canada-by-province/
So divide the ICU and hospitalization numbers by 1,200 to get the numbers *per hospital*:
We are on Day 709 of the pandemic. Fully 708 days / 101 weeks have passed, since Canada's first case of 2020-01-25, when a man in Toronto tested positive for Covid-19, after arriving in Canada from Wuhan, China.
The data here covers 706 days, from 2020-01-25 through to 2021-12-30.
Now let's do the math:
- There have been 15.58 ICU admissions per hospital in 706 days [18,701 admissions spread over 1,200 hospitals] = one additional ICU admission PER HOSPITAL every 45.3 days [ONE additional ICU patient PER HOSPITAL every 6.5 weeks in all of Canada!]
- There have been 80.3 additional hospitalizations per hospital [96,349 hospitalizations spread over 1,200 hospitals] = one additional hospitalization PER HOSPITAL every 8.8 days [which works out to 3-4 additional hospitalizations PER HOSPITAL PER MONTH, in all of Canada, with a "hospitalization" being defined as either a hospital stay of over 8 or 24 hours - my nurse friend from the TBRHSC says >24 hours].
Deaths:
Canada's population is 38,247,166.
Therefore, 1 in 1,273 died.
82.3% of deaths [24,720 of 30,042] were people aged 70+.
92.8% of deaths [27,887 of 30,042] were people aged 60+.
97.3% of deaths [29,221 of 30,042] were people aged 50+.
98.9% of deaths [29,707 of 30,042] were people aged 40+.
As said, 1 in 1,273 people died, and 82.3% who died were 70+, as per the data above [24,720 of 30,042 deaths in the 70+ group].
So only ~0.2 per ~1,273 Canadians who died were under age 70.
= 1 per 7,186.6.
Put another way:
For every 7,187 Canadians, ONE person under age *70* has died, thus far in nearly two years of this alleged *lethal pandemic*.
That works out to 14 Canadians under age 70 dying per 100,000 population, over *nearly two years* since this hyped pandemic started.
So COVID has killed 7 Canadians per year per city/population of 100,000 people, since this pandemic started, almost two years ago.
Now factor in underlying conditions:
In the USA, 94% of those who died had not one - but 2-3 underlying conditions on average [26 comorbidities per 10 decedents, 2.6 on average, REF: CDC, August 2020, reported here by Coach].
In Canada, where less data is available, the numbers that have been released show at least 80% of those who died had underlying health conditions.
Now factor in obesity:
In the USA, 78% of those who died were overweight or obese [REF: CDC]
So now do the math:
- Fewer than 7 per 100,000 population per year under age 70 have died of COVID in Canada, since this pandemic started in Canada on 2020-01-25.
- Over 80% have health conditions, which means fewer than 1.4 per 100,000 Canadians per year have died who are both [1] under age 70, [2] who had no health conditions have died of COVID [7 per 500,000].
- As there is substantial overlap between obesity and having health conditions, I have no way of knowing what percentage of the people who died who did not have health conditions were obese or not...but my suspicion is that almost all people who died who were not elderly or with health conditions were MORBIDLY obese.
^ Did you wonder why you haven't noticed anyone dying of COVID?
Because, with all due respect:
NO ONE WHO ISN'T MORBIDLY OBESE OR A DINOSAUR IS DYING OF COVID.
I'm flabbergasted that literally EVERYONE was taken in my this bollocks, lol. Literally 99% of people at Wal-Mart at any time in my city are still wearing masks! LOL @ the number of people taken in by this scam.
Here's another way to look at these numbers:
As you can clearly see from the mortality data posted below, only 5,322 Canadians under age 70 have died so far [5,322 of 30,042 total deaths].
5,322 per 38,247,166 Canadian population, over nearly two years of experiencing this "lethal pandemic".
So only one person under age 70 have died per 7,187 Canadians - but that's in almost two years.
Now when you consider that over 80% of these people had MULTIPLE underlying health conditions...we get to this bombshell:
Fewer than 1,000 Canadians who died were both under age 70, and had no health conditions.
Now if you take that <1,000 of the 5,322 Canadians under age 70 who died, of the 30,042 total Canadian deaths, assuming the Canadian data is anything remotely close to the Canadian data:
Around 80% were overweight or obese, or had MULTIPLE underlying health conditions.
38.2% [1,334 of 3,489] were aged 60-69.
So - what - maybe 80% of 2,155 TOTAL NUMBER OF CANADIANS UNDER AGE 60 WHO DIED, had underlying health conditions, or were obese?
So possibly as many as 420 Canadians under age 60 died, who were both in good health AND weren't morbidly obese?
420 people?
420 people in a nation of over 38.2M, with over 28.5M being in that age group?
Why would ANYONE:
Under age 70.
Not obese.
With no health conditions.
Be worried about this pandemic?
The bottom line is that only 3,489 Canadians under age 70 have died so far - NEARLY TWO YEARS INTO THIS THING.
Only 2,155 Canadians under age 60 have died.
2,155 of 28,557,431 in that under 60 age range!
An American nurse told me that private American hospitals received $13,000 for every death they reported as being COVID. Does anyone know if that is true?
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/2aJWp7iwvHS7wOTUpc/giphy.gif)
-
Now let's do an analysis on vaccines.
VACCINES:
By 2020-12-26, 46,156 received at least one vaccine dose...so...Canada was pretty well unvaccinated in 2020.
By 2021-12-16 [one year later], 81.79% of Canada's TOTAL population have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.
By 2020-12-18, 76.49%, [or 29,253,025 Canadians] were fully vaccinated.
So in 2020, in the 334 days that Covid-19 was [1] confirmed to be in Canada, and [2] part of the reporting dates, we had 14,642 deaths.
In 2021, in the 357 days that COVID and/or variants were included in the reporting deaths, we had 14,473 deaths.
Unfortunately, I don't have the end of year data for hospitalizations and ICU admissions.
I do have the data for 2021-02-12 - here are the updated Canadian totals spread over 1,200+ Canadian hospitals as of that date in February, 2021:
45,057 hospitalizations.
8,005 ICU admissions.
Here is the updated data, as of 2021-12-30:
96,349 hospitalizations
18,701 ICU admissions.
^ I don't even know what to make of that.
I
From the *6-day* period from 21-12-24 to 21-12-30, Canada has had:
- 129 additional deaths.
- 195 additional ICU admissions.
- 1,325 additional hospitalizations.
So the average in the first 700 days [through to 2021-12-24] works out to 135.75 hospitalizations per week [95,024÷700] PER HOSPITAL, as per the data above.
Meanwhile in the six days between those dates [2021-12-24 through to 2021-12-30]:
We've had 1,325 additional hospitalizations [96,349 - 95,024, via data above], which works out to 220.83 [1,325÷6] per day.
So we had 85.08 additional hospitalizations [220.83 - 135.75] from 12-24 to 12-30.
Gee...does Covid-19 has a seasonality to it...you know...like a FLU?
Next - ICU admissions and deaths [2021-12-30]:
- 18,701 ICU patients, up from 18,505 [on 21-12-24]
- 30,042 deaths, up from 29,913.
That's 196 additional ICU patients, and 129 additional deaths, over that 6-day period. That's [doing the math in my head]: 32.67 ICU patients per day, and 21.5 deaths per day [from 12-24 to 12-30].
Now, let's view the averages for the first 700 days of the pandemic, from 2020-01-25 to 2021-12-24:
- 26.44 ICU patients per day [18505÷700].
- 42.73 deaths per day [29913÷700].
So we are UP by 6.23 ICU patients per day, and deaths are still over 50% the average [21.5 / 42.73] = 50.31%.
And vaccinated people are not just the majority of cases, they are *overrepresented based on their percentage of the population*.
Happy New Year - and enjoy your boosters.
(https://viralviralvideos.com/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/08/GIF-Approve-Like-Likes-clapping-approval-GIF.gif)
-
Updated Canadian COVID Death and Hospitalization Data [REF: Public Health Agency of Canada - see attachments]:
Read the *parts in bold only* to see how ridiculous the numbers are - if you want the supporting evidence proving my claims to be true, read the rest of the information here.
2021-12-30, 7PM EST:
- 30,042 deaths.
- 18,701 ICU admissions.
- 96,349 hospitalizations.
^ In TOTAL in ALL OF CANADA, since the PANDEMIC START.
^^ Please note that there are over 1,200 hospitals in Canada [references below].
https://www.statista.com/statistics/440923/total-number-of-hospital-establishments-in-canada-by-province/
So divide the ICU and hospitalization numbers by 1,200 to get the numbers *per hospital*:
We are on Day 709 of the pandemic. Fully 708 days / 101 weeks have passed, since Canada's first case of 2020-01-25, when a man in Toronto tested positive for Covid-19, after arriving in Canada from Wuhan, China.
The data here covers 706 days, from 2020-01-25 through to 2021-12-30.
Now let's do the math:
- There have been 15.58 ICU admissions per hospital in 706 days [18,701 admissions spread over 1,200 hospitals] = one additional ICU admission PER HOSPITAL every 45.3 days [ONE additional ICU patient PER HOSPITAL every 6.5 weeks in all of Canada!]
- There have been 80.3 additional hospitalizations per hospital [96,349 hospitalizations spread over 1,200 hospitals] = one additional hospitalization PER HOSPITAL every 8.8 days [which works out to 3-4 additional hospitalizations PER HOSPITAL PER MONTH, in all of Canada, with a "hospitalization" being defined as either a hospital stay of over 8 or 24 hours - my nurse friend from the TBRHSC says >24 hours].
Deaths:
Canada's population is 38,247,166.
Therefore, 1 in 1,273 died.
82.3% of deaths [24,720 of 30,042] were people aged 70+.
92.8% of deaths [27,887 of 30,042] were people aged 60+.
97.3% of deaths [29,221 of 30,042] were people aged 50+.
98.9% of deaths [29,707 of 30,042] were people aged 40+.
As said, 1 in 1,273 people died, and 82.3% who died were 70+, as per the data above [24,720 of 30,042 deaths in the 70+ group].
So only ~0.2 per ~1,273 Canadians who died were under age 70.
= 1 per 7,186.6.
Put another way:
For every 7,187 Canadians, ONE person under age *70* has died, thus far in nearly two years of this alleged *lethal pandemic*.
That works out to 14 Canadians under age 70 dying per 100,000 population, over *nearly two years* since this hyped pandemic started.
So COVID has killed 7 Canadians per year per city/population of 100,000 people, since this pandemic started, almost two years ago.
Now factor in underlying conditions:
In the USA, 94% of those who died had not one - but 2-3 underlying conditions on average [26 comorbidities per 10 decedents, 2.6 on average, REF: CDC, August 2020, reported here by Coach].
In Canada, where less data is available, the numbers that have been released show at least 80% of those who died had underlying health conditions.
Now factor in obesity:
In the USA, 78% of those who died were overweight or obese [REF: CDC]
So now do the math:
- Fewer than 7 per 100,000 population per year under age 70 have died of COVID in Canada, since this pandemic started in Canada on 2020-01-25.
- Over 80% have health conditions, which means fewer than 1.4 per 100,000 Canadians per year have died who are both [1] under age 70, [2] who had no health conditions have died of COVID [7 per 500,000].
- As there is substantial overlap between obesity and having health conditions, I have no way of knowing what percentage of the people who died who did not have health conditions were obese or not...but my suspicion is that almost all people who died who were not elderly or with health conditions were MORBIDLY obese.
^ Did you wonder why you haven't noticed anyone dying of COVID?
Because, with all due respect:
NO ONE WHO ISN'T MORBIDLY OBESE OR A DINOSAUR IS DYING OF COVID.
I'm flabbergasted that literally EVERYONE was taken in my this bollocks, lol. Literally 99% of people at Wal-Mart at any time in my city are still wearing masks! LOL @ the number of people taken in by this scam.
Here's another way to look at these numbers:
As you can clearly see from the mortality data posted below, only 5,322 Canadians under age 70 have died so far [5,322 of 30,042 total deaths].
5,322 per 38,247,166 Canadian population, over nearly two years of experiencing this "lethal pandemic".
So only one person under age 70 have died per 7,187 Canadians - but that's in almost two years.
Now when you consider that over 80% of these people had MULTIPLE underlying health conditions...we get to this bombshell:
Fewer than 1,000 Canadians who died were both under age 70, and had no health conditions.
Now if you take that <1,000 of the 5,322 Canadians under age 70 who died, of the 30,042 total Canadian deaths, assuming the Canadian data is anything remotely close to the Canadian data:
Around 80% were overweight or obese, or had MULTIPLE underlying health conditions.
38.2% [1,334 of 3,489] were aged 60-69.
So - what - maybe 80% of 2,155 TOTAL NUMBER OF CANADIANS UNDER AGE 60 WHO DIED, had underlying health conditions, or were obese?
So possibly as many as 420 Canadians under age 60 died, who were both in good health AND weren't morbidly obese?
420 people?
420 people in a nation of over 38.2M, with over 28.5M being in that age group?
Why would ANYONE:
Under age 70.
Not obese.
With no health conditions.
Be worried about this pandemic?
The bottom line is that only 3,489 Canadians under age 70 have died so far - NEARLY TWO YEARS INTO THIS THING.
Only 2,155 Canadians under age 60 have died.
2,155 of 28,557,431 in that under 60 age range!
An American nurse told me that private American hospitals received $13,000 for every death they reported as being COVID. Does anyone know if that is true?
Well Done Matt
Only you're posting far to much Truth & Facts for The Brainwashed Sheep like to be able to Comprehend & actually take in.
They will reject & ignore all that does not fit in with what they've been programmed to Believe & accept
All semblance of Rational Thought & Questioning has been removed from Them.
-
Being frankly honest...
....No one cares, It's Canada for fucks sake...
-
I think the single easiest statistic that calls bullshit on all of this is the total deaths vs. population. In Canada it is 1 in 1,273, in the US it is 1 in 420. Either number is far too low to justify shutdowns, forced vaccines, masking, school closures, etc.
And this is putting aside the fact that these deaths are old, sick, and/or obese (i.e. health compromised).
-
I think the single easiest statistic that calls bullshit on all of this is the total deaths vs. population. In Canada it is 1 in 1,273, in the US it is 1 in 420. Either number is far too low to justify shutdowns, forced vaccines, masking, school closures, etc.
And this is putting aside the fact that these deaths are old, sick, and/or obese (i.e. health compromised).
Your numbers are wrong.
Chance of death is 1 in 50.
Get your act together antivaxxer!
😎
-
That's a LOWER survival rate that ANY other single disease in North America.
Also, because I'm not selfish and don't just care about myself, I want to AVOID spreading the virus to others.
8) 8) 8)
I know...
However, the bottom line is that only 2,155 Canadians under age 60 have died of this virus, out of 28,557,431.
2K of over 28.5M, and this worries you???
Then, on top of that, over 1,600 of those who died had cancer or other diseases! LOL!
YOU WOULDN'T EVEN NOTICE THIS PANDEMIC IF IT WASN'T ON THE NEWS!!!
Check this out - gyms and restaurants are now going to be closed in Ontario to the vaccinated. LOLOLOL:
Report: Ontario considering online learning for 2 weeks, closing gyms and no indoor dining
https://www.tbnewswatch.com/coronavirus-covid-19-local-news/report-ontario-considering-online-learning-for-2-weeks-closing-gyms-and-no-indoor-dining-4916390
;D ;D ;D
PS - Enjoy your boosters!
-
I know...
However, the bottom line is that only 2,155 Canadians under age 60 have died of this virus, out of 28,557,431.
2K of over 28.5M, and this worries you???
Then, on top of that, over 1,600 of those who died had cancer or other diseases! LOL!
YOU WOULDN'T EVEN NOTICE THIS PANDEMIC IF IT WASN'T ON THE NEWS!!!
Check this out - gyms and restaurants are now going to be closed in Ontario to the vaccinated. LOLOLOL:
Report: Ontario considering online learning for 2 weeks, closing gyms and no indoor dining
https://www.tbnewswatch.com/coronavirus-covid-19-local-news/report-ontario-considering-online-learning-for-2-weeks-closing-gyms-and-no-indoor-dining-4916390
;D ;D ;D
PS - Enjoy your boosters!
Looks like Ford is losing his mind.
😉
-
Your numbers are wrong.
Chance of death is 1 in 50.
Get your act together antivaxxer!
😎
Do you agree that 82.28% of that 1 in 50 who died were aged 70+
82.28% = 24,720 of 30,042 - as per the data below.
OAK - do you agree with this government collected data? Just answer Yes or No please.
-
Looks like Ford is losing his mind.
😉
Remember how you said that unvaccinated people will have a limited lifestyle?
Looks like in Ontario, all the vaccinated sheep have the same limits as us unvaccinated.
:-\
-
Do you agree that 82.28% of that 1 in 50 who died were aged 70+
82.28% = 24,720 of 30,042 - as per the data below.
OAK - do you agree with this government collected data? Just answer Yes or No please.
Yes
-
Yes
Perfect.
So we agree that over 80% who die are aged 70+.
So...let's do the math:
1 in 50 die <-- This is the information you gave.
100 in 5,000 die <-- Multiplication factor, based on the information you gave.
Over 80 of 100 in 5,000 who die are 70+ <-- Point you conceded.
So 20 of 100 in 5,000 who die are under age 70 <-- By extension.
So, based on information that you gave, and government data that you conceded, that 1 in 50, thus 100 in 5,000 people who get COVID die, that:
Only [under] 20 in 5,000 who get COVID who die are under age 70.
That's 1 in 250.
With the other 4 in 250 who die being aged 70+.
So, fewer than 1 in 250 people who get COVID who die are under age 70
I broke down that using math which was logically correct every step of the way.
So:
Do you agree that among the 1 in 50 who die, which is 5 in 250 - this being from the information that you provided - that 4 of those 5 are aged 70+, and therefore, only [under] 1 in 250 people who get COVID who die are under age 70.
Do you agree with this - Yes or No?
-
Go easy on oak math is not his strong suit. I think his head may explode.
-
Go easy on oak math is not his strong suit. I think his head may explode.
;D ;D ;D
Notice I'm breaking down these things literally step by step? The reason is to force him to concede that the odds of a healthy person under age 70 dying of COVID is under 1 in 1,000 [or, conversely, the odds of a healthy person under age 70 to survive COVID is over 99.9% - and that's IF they get it, and not everyone will get it - AND the virus is weakening as we develop herd immunity, despite the government doing everything possible to prevent herd immunity].
OAK said 1 in 50 who get it will die.
That's 100 in 5,000 simply using HIS data.
But if over 80 of those 100 in 5,000 are aged 70+, then under 20 in 5,000 are under age 70.
That's under 1 in 250.
Soon, just using basic math, I will get OAK to admit that COVID is 99.9% survivable, for anyone who isn't a dinosaur with multiple health conditions.
And even what few of those people ARE dying, most are 150-lb overweight.
It's time to get a grip on this.
-
;D ;D ;D
Notice I'm breaking down these things literally step by step? The reason is to force him to concede that the odds of a healthy person under age 70 dying of COVID is under 1 in 1,000 [or, conversely, the odds of a healthy person under age 70 to survive COVID is over 99.9% - and that's IF they get it, and not everyone will get it - AND the virus is weakening as we develop herd immunity, despite the government doing everything possible to prevent herd immunity].
OAK said 1 in 50 who get it will die.
That's 100 in 5,000 simply using HIS data.
But if over 80 of those 100 in 5,000 are aged 70+, then under 20 in 5,000 are under age 70.
That's under 1 in 250.
Soon, just using basic math, I will get OAK to admit that COVID is 99.9% survivable, for anyone who isn't a dinosaur with multiple health conditions.
And even what few of those people ARE dying, most are 150-lb overweight.
It's time to get a grip on this.
And we only know of those who have Covid from those who test positive. The vast majority of those with Covid will never get tested so won't count in the stats. Everyone who dies with Covid gets counted.
-
And we only know of those who have Covid from those who test positive. The vast majority of those with Covid will never get tested so won't count in the stats. Everyone who dies with Covid gets counted.
the people who get tested are the people who wear masks, non mask wearers dont go for tests because they dont take it seriously
So all the positive tests are from mask wearers.
-
Matt is breaking the internets.
(https://media.giphy.com/media/TrIcWVH34d1KntXWi1/giphy.gif)
-
And we only know of those who have Covid from those who test positive. The vast majority of those with Covid will never get tested so won't count in the stats. Everyone who dies with Covid gets counted.
Also, something INSANE to consider [for the Canadian data - but likely true everywhere]:
People ALREADY IN ICU who test positive on a bullshit PCR test are considered COVID ICU admissions! LMAO! Absolute fraud.
In fact, my friends 87-year-old uncle went to the hospital for something COMPLETELY SEPARATE from a respiratory pathogen. They asked him if he was unvaccinated, and he said no, at which point they tested him for COVID using the bullshit PCR test, which came "positive", then they held him their and treated him like a criminal!
Check out the recent Joe Rogan podcast with Dr. Robert Malone to see how much fraud is taking place.
An American nurse friend said American hospitals get something like $13,000 per "COVID" death, so they ramp the cycle threshold of the PCR test to 35+, WHICH IS SO HIGH THAT A BANANA IN THE SAME ROOM AS A PERSON WITH COVID WILL TEST POSITIVE FOR COVID BY DOING THAT - and they collect all the federal emergency money.
THIS IS WHY LITERALLY NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON HERE NOTICES A "PANDEMIC" TAKING PLACE - BECAUSE IT'S ALL FRAUD.
This is some "Emperor Has No Clothes" level bullshit!
Check out the Joe Rogan interview with Dr. Robert W. Malone before it gets removed from YouTube:
-
To buy into the scam you have to accept two basic premises:
1. That governments which send young people to have their arms and legs blown off in pointless wars somehow care about decrepit old people who are on their last legs anyway.
2. That governments which supposedly care about public health yet have done nothing to deal with the obesity epidemic which has been responsible for over 75% of the Covid hospitalizations.
-
;D ;D ;D
Notice I'm breaking down these things literally step by step? The reason is to force him to concede that the odds of a healthy person under age 70 dying of COVID is under 1 in 1,000 [or, conversely, the odds of a healthy person under age 70 to survive COVID is over 99.9% - and that's IF they get it, and not everyone will get it - AND the virus is weakening as we develop herd immunity, despite the government doing everything possible to prevent herd immunity].
OAK said 1 in 50 who get it will die.
That's 100 in 5,000 simply using HIS data.
But if over 80 of those 100 in 5,000 are aged 70+, then under 20 in 5,000 are under age 70.
That's under 1 in 250.
Soon, just using basic math, I will get OAK to admit that COVID is 99.9% survivable, for anyone who isn't a dinosaur with multiple health conditions.
And even what few of those people ARE dying, most are 150-lb overweight.
It's time to get a grip on this.
Just get to your final point.
🙂
-
Just get to your final point.
🙂
I think its just Matts long winded way of saying you have no idea what your talking about..
-
Just get to your final point.
🙂
So 1 in 250 people die of COVID who are under age 70.
Do you agree that over 80% have multiple underlying health conditions? In the USA, the CDC reported in August of 2020 that 94% who die have 2-3 underlying conditions on average, reported here by Coach at the time.
In Canada, the number is over 80%.
You agree that 1 in 250 who die are under age 70.
So that's 100 in 25,000
80% of whom have multiple underlying health conditions.
That's 80 of that 100 in 25,000.
So only 20 in 25,000 are under age 70 AND have no underlying health conditions.
That's 2 in 2,500.
Which is 1 in 1,250.
Which is 0.08%.
WHICH MEANS THAT THIS VIRUS, USING YOUR OWN DATA, HAS A 99.92% SURVIVAL RATE FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE UNDER AGE 70.
So why on EARTH is Ontario closing down again???
-
I think its just Matts long winded way of saying you have no idea what your talking about..
LMAO - YES.
joswift, are you still relatively jacked?
If so, I would have loved to see the look on that guy's face who blamed this on the unvaccinated while you were at the gym, and you asked him why any of this is your fault.
That pussy was probably shitting in his drawers. :D
-
LMAO - YES.
joswift, are you still relatively jacked?
If so, I would have loved to see the look on that guy's face who blamed this on the unvaccinated while you were at the gym, and you asked him why any of this is your fault.
That pussy was probably shitting in his drawers. :D
He just waffled on quoting stuff he had sen on the TV
He left without giving any reasoned explanation of why he said it in the first place.
A bit like people who say "racism is everywhere" without being able to give a single example of when its happened to them..
-
He just waffled on quoting stuff he had sen on the TV
He left without giving any reasoned explanation of why he said it in the first place.
A bit like people who say "racism is everywhere" without being able to give a single example of when its happened to them..
In Quebec, apparently Muslims are seeking out mental healthcare at higher rates, because the Quebecois put their foot down on letting Muslim women wear Hijabs or Niqabs while teaching school. So they are flooding mental health services.
Weird that they won't flood back to their Muslim countries. ::)
I'm glad you stood your ground and called that guy out, joswift. Good for you. I wish more people joined you.
-
Just get to your final point.
🙂
I dug these posts of yours up. Took a while, but I'm glad I found them:
It's just a matter of time before the unvaccinated won't be able to leave their homes in the US.
I can't believe you're so trusting of the government.
::)
In Canada you don’t need to wear a mask in a gym but you need to be vaccinated.
Yeah, how's that booster working out for you?
Looking forward to your coming lockdowns? Been to any good restaurants lately?
Ontario moves school online, pauses non-urgent procedures as part of new COVID-19 measures
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ford-public-health-measures-jan-3-1.6302531
The new restrictions announced today also include:
- Indoor dining at restaurants and bars closed.
- Only outdoor dining, takeout, drive through and delivery permitted.
Social gathering limits reduced to five people indoors and 10 people outdoors.
- Retail stores, malls and personal care services limited to 50 per cent capacity.
- Saunas, steam rooms, and oxygen bars closed.
...on top of that, gyms closed, all non-emergency medical procedures including mastectomies and cancer screenings are all off for at least three weeks to flatten the curve.
And on, and on, and on!! All of these things are closed TO THE VACCINATED TOO! I LOVE IT!! :D
;D ;D ;D
-
Matt,
Nice job on the stats. But you have to realize that the irrational fear of Covid has been turned into a mass psychosis for the weak minded and as a result, no amount of science will make a difference to them. It's similar to "climate change".
-
Matt,
Nice job on the stats. But you have to realize that the irrational fear of Covid has been turned into a mass psychosis for the weak minded and as a result, no amount of science will make a difference to them. It's similar to "climate change".
Thank you for saying that, Hypertrophy.
I think I do a good job putting the math and statistics of this pandemic into general terms - in a way that the layperson can understand.
I asked my friend - who was a COVID narrative believer for the first year - if I should write a book on COVID.
He sarcastically said "Yeah, because you're a doctor, right?"
Eh? I have a 4-year undergraduate degree in mathematics. How is that not qualified to analyze this pandemic mathematically?
My entire analysis has been mathematical - not medical.
Incidentally, do you have any suggestions on how to deal with this global mass psychosis?
-
Thank you for saying that, Hypertrophy.
I think I do a good job putting the math and statistics of this pandemic into general terms - in a way that the layperson can understand.
I asked my friend - who was a COVID narrative believer for the first year - if I should write a book on COVID.
He sarcastically said "Yeah, because you're a doctor, right?"
Eh? I have a 4-year undergraduate degree in mathematics. How is that not qualified to analyze this pandemic mathematically?
My entire analysis has been mathematical - not medical.
Incidentally, do you have any suggestions on how to deal with this global mass psychosis?
Yes I do- zero tolerance of their psychotic viewpoints. Just say fuck off. That wakes em up.
Some months ago I walked into a UPS store and was the only one not wearing a mask. A woman waiting near the counter asked me why I didn't have a mask on and my response was "What businesses is it of yours?"
She started to go off of how I was selfish, blah blah blah. My response? " Lady, I could not care less if you or your family drops dead from Covid. You mean nothing to me."
Man that shut the bitch up, lol.
I truly don't give a shit what other people think. Just leave me alone. If the government tries to stop me from living by preventing me from working or getting food, medical care or shelter, then it is time to get rid of the government. Or die trying.
If more people just said no, this charade would end.
-
Matt,
Nice job on the stats. But you have to realize that the irrational fear of Covid has been turned into a mass psychosis for the weak minded and as a result, no amount of science will make a difference to them. It's similar to "climate change".
This x10000
I have not tried to smarten anybody up in about a year and a half. They can’t handle it.
-
This x10000
I have not tried to smarten anybody up in about a year and a half. They can’t handle it.
There most certainly is a massive percentage of the species that has taken the bait, hook, line and sinker.
A collective hypnosis.
No amount of reality will “fix” them.
It’s truly terrifying.
-
Yes I do- zero tolerance of their psychotic viewpoints. Just say fuck off. That wakes em up.
Some months ago I walked into a UPS store and was the only one not wearing a mask. A woman waiting near the counter asked me why I didn't have a mask on and my response was "What businesses is it of yours?"
She started to go off of how I was selfish, blah blah blah. My response? " Lady, I could not care less if you or your family drops dead from Covid. You mean nothing to me."
Man that shut the bitch up, lol.
I truly don't give a shit what other people think. Just leave me alone. If the government tries to stop me from living by preventing me from working or getting food, medical care or shelter, then it is time to get rid of the government. Or die trying.
If more people just said no, this charade would end.
WOW....great post.
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/018/971/b92.gif)
-
So 1 in 250 people die of COVID who are under age 70.
Do you agree that over 80% have multiple underlying health conditions? In the USA, the CDC reported in August of 2020 that 94% who die have 2-3 underlying conditions on average, reported here by Coach at the time.
In Canada, the number is over 80%.
You agree that 1 in 250 who die are under age 70.
So that's 100 in 25,000
80% of whom have multiple underlying health conditions.
That's 80 of that 100 in 25,000.
So only 20 in 25,000 are under age 70 AND have no underlying health conditions.
That's 2 in 2,500.
Which is 1 in 1,250.
Which is 0.08%.
WHICH MEANS THAT THIS VIRUS, USING YOUR OWN DATA, HAS A 99.92% SURVIVAL RATE FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE UNDER AGE 70.
So why on EARTH is Ontario closing down again???
Why is Ontario going into a full lockdown? Because COVID is surging right now (thanks antivaxxers).
Yes the chance of dying from COVID is less if you're under 70. Yes your calculations are correct. BUT WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
:(
-
Why is Ontario going into a full lockdown? Because COVID is surging right now (thanks antivaxxers).
Yes the chance of dying from COVID is less if you're under 70. Yes your calculations are correct. BUT WHAT IS YOUR POINT?
:(
My point is that all the vaccine hesitant people who are being hospitalized, or being admitted to the ICU, are almost all aged 70+, and/or 150-lb overweight, and/or have MULTIPLE underlying conditions.
The people being hospitalized, who do appear to be disproportionately vaccinated, have nothing to do with me, because they are mostly fat fucks.
It's like you're complaining about people who don't take Baby Aspirin clogging up the ER while having heart attacks, and failing to mention they are all fat AF. ::)
Go take your complaint out on the fat disgusting pieces of shit who are clearly in the vulnerable group, yet aren't getting the vaccine.
I haven't gotten A COMMON COLD in 10.5 years. What the fuck does this have to do with me.
And I live alone in a detached home, and I live off my savings.
What the fuck are you doing, working with the public?
Who the fuck are you to expose yourself to other people, and put Manitobans at risk?
-
WOW....great post.
(https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/018/971/b92.gif)
What do you plan to do when Manitoba goes into full lockdown?
Probably call other pro vaccine Big Pharma shills so you can invite them over and shoe each other up the ass.
-
What do you plan to do when Manitoba goes into full lockdown?
Probably call other pro vaccine Big Pharma shills so you can invite them over and shoe each other up the ass.
I’m an essential health care worker.
I’ll be fine.
🙂
-
My point is that all the vaccine hesitant people who are being hospitalized, or being admitted to the ICU, are almost all aged 70+, and/or 150-lb overweight, and/or have MULTIPLE underlying conditions.
The people being hospitalized, who do appear to be disproportionately vaccinated, have nothing to do with me, because they are mostly fat fucks.
It's like you're complaining about people who don't take Baby Aspirin clogging up the ER while having heart attacks, and failing to mention they are all fat AF. ::)
Go take your complaint out on the fat disgusting pieces of shit who are clearly in the vulnerable group, yet aren't getting the vaccine.
I haven't gotten A COMMON COLD in 10.5 years. What the fuck does this have to do with me.
And I live alone in a detached home, and I live off my savings.
What the fuck are you doing, working with the public?
Who the fuck are you to expose yourself to other people, and put Manitobans at risk?
So what your are saying is:
I don't care that millions of others will die from the virus.....I only care about myself.
:(
-
Brutal if true...
-
So what your are saying is:
I don't care that millions of others will die from the virus.....I only care about myself.
:(
No. I personally feel that it is my ETHICAL responsibility [NOT in any way my legal responsibility] to not spread respiratory pathogens to other people. A standard I don't see vaccinated Covid Mary's holding themselves to as they walk around thinking they aren't able to infect others, or attend vaccined orgies where they shoe each other in the ass.
KISS’s Gene Simmons To Anti-Vaxxers, Unvaccinated ‘You Are An Enemy’
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/11/12/kisss-gene-simmons-calls-the-enemy-those-unvaccinated-against-covid-19/
Gene Simmons: I slept with 4800 women during KISS days
https://www.toronto.com/whatson-story/6564107-gene-simmons-i-slept-with-4800-women-during-kiss-days/
^ What gives this walking venereal infection the right to sleep with so many women, and shoe his fellow KISS members up the ass??
Did any Rabbi tell him that's KOSHER? I didn't think so!
Again - I live alone in a detached home, and live off my savings.
What am I putting anyone at risk for?
Meanwhile, compare my behaviour to this Hungarian politician from your camp, who disobeyed Hungarian lockdown orders to shoe other men in the ass:
An anti-gay Hungarian politician has resigned after being caught by the police fleeing a 25-man orgy through a window
https://www.businessinsider.com/hungarian-mep-resigns-breaking-covid-rules-gay-orgy-brussels-2020-12
Meanwhile, you [OAK], are exposed to far more people. Even masked and vaxxed, you are in contact with so many more people than me, that you put others at greater risk.
What gives you the right?
I'm home alone posting on Getbig.
-
No. I personally feel that it is my ETHICAL responsibility [NOT in any way my legal responsibility] to not spread respiratory pathogens to other people. A standard I don't see vaccinated Covid Mary's holding themselves to as they walk around thinking they aren't able to infect others, or attend vaccined orgies where they shoe each other in the ass.
KISS’s Gene Simmons To Anti-Vaxxers, Unvaccinated ‘You Are An Enemy’
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/11/12/kisss-gene-simmons-calls-the-enemy-those-unvaccinated-against-covid-19/
Gene Simmons: I slept with 4800 women during KISS days
https://www.toronto.com/whatson-story/6564107-gene-simmons-i-slept-with-4800-women-during-kiss-days/
^ What gives this walking venereal infection the right to sleep with so many women, and shoe his fellow KISS members up the ass??
Did any Rabbi tell him that's KOSHER? I didn't think so!
Again - I live alone in a detached home, and live off my savings.
What am I putting anyone at risk for?
Meanwhile, compare my behaviour to this Hungarian politician from your camp, who disobeyed Hungarian lockdown orders to shoe other men in the ass:
An anti-gay Hungarian politician has resigned after being caught by the police fleeing a 25-man orgy through a window
https://www.businessinsider.com/hungarian-mep-resigns-breaking-covid-rules-gay-orgy-brussels-2020-12
Meanwhile, you [OAK], are exposed to far more people. Even masked and vaxxed, you are in contact with so many more people than me, that you put others at greater risk.
What gives you the right?
I'm home alone posting on Getbig.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1256999/number-covid-hospitalizations-canada-by-vaccination-status/
What's your take on these stats Matt?
I thought you proved mathematically that the vaccine "doesn't work".
8) 8) 8)
-
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1256999/number-covid-hospitalizations-canada-by-vaccination-status/
What's your take on these stats Matt?
I thought you proved mathematically that the vaccine "doesn't work".
8) 8) 8)
Go read up on what "fully vaccinated" means ;)
-
My precious feewings don’t care about your stupid facts!!
-
Go read up on what "fully vaccinated" means ;)
Who is fully immunized?
Individuals are considered fully immunized:
two (2) weeks after their second dose in a two-dose series, such as the Pfizer, Moderna, or Astra Zeneca vaccines, or
two (2) weeks after a single-dose vaccine, such as Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaccine
two (2) weeks after receiving three (3) doses of a non-Health Canada approved vaccine
individuals who have received one or two doses of COVID-19 vaccines outside of Canada with vaccines not approved in Canada require a dose of Pfizer or Moderna to be considered fully immunized
Here you go MORON.
You antivaxxers are the DUMBEST PEOPLE on the planet.
8) 8) 8)
https://www.gov.mb.ca/covid19/fundamentals/life-after-immunization.html
-
the people who get tested are the people who wear masks, non mask wearers dont go for tests because they dont take it seriously
So all the positive tests are from mask wearers.
If non mask wearers were to get tested it would likely noticeably change the stats. 'All' is an overstatement. No doubt there are some non mask wears who have gotten tested. Also based on your theory, the negative tests are also from mask wearers.
-
If non mask wearers were to get tested it would likely noticeably change the stats. 'All' is an overstatement. No doubt there are some non mask wears who have gotten tested. Also based on your theory, the negative tests are also from mask wearers.
thats beacuse masks dont stop transmission...
-
thats beacuse masks dont stop transmission...
Huh? A negative test means you don't have COVID. A positive test means you do. Sometimes the tests results are wrong.
-
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1256999/number-covid-hospitalizations-canada-by-vaccination-status/
What's your take on these stats Matt?
I thought you proved mathematically that the vaccine "doesn't work".
8) 8) 8)
The vaccine doesn't do anything to stop the spread of COVID, apparently. Or at least - the government is doing everything possible to prove that, lol.
Why else would Doug Ford have said we could get up to 100,000 Omicron cases daily? ::)
I mean, what other excuse could there be for that?
There's no way we'd be worried about 100,000 cases a day becoming a problem.
Do the math:
77.078% of Ontario's entire population of 13,448,494 is fully vaccinated.
That's 10,365,830 Ontarians.
That means only 3,082,664 [13,448,494 minus 10,365,830] are unvaccinated.
So tell me, OAK - if 100,000 Omicron cases daily is a serious issue, why would that even be a problem for more than a month?
Furthermore, Doug Ford said that we might have up to 1% of those cases resulting in hospitalizations.
LOL.
WE'VE ONLY HAD 96,349 HOSPITALIZATIONS IN ALL OF CANADA, THIS ENTIRE TIME. WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE HAVE 30,000 HOSPITALIZATIONS A MONTH IN ONTARIO ALONE, WITH A VARIANT THAT HAS BECOME WEAKER WITH TIME???
HAHAHAHAHA. You can't make this up.
Check out the updated Canadian hospitalization data which is CLEARLY SHOWN BELOW, and obviously refutes the nonsense that Doug Ford has warned about.
HAHAHAHA, you can't make this up.
https://covid19tracker.ca/provincevac.html?p=ON
-
The vaccine doesn't do anything to stop the spread of COVID, apparently. Or at least - the government is doing everything possible to prove that, lol.
Why else would Doug Ford have said we could get up to 100,000 Omicron cases daily? ::)
I mean, what other excuse could there be for that?
There's no way we'd be worried about 100,000 cases a day becoming a problem
Do the math:
77.078% of Ontario's entire population of 13,448,494 is fully vaccinated.
That's 10,365,830 Ontarians.
That means only 3,082,664 [13,448,494 minus 10,365,830] are unvaccinated.
So tell me, OAK - if 100,000 Omicron cases daily is a serious issue, why would that even be a problem for more than a month?
Furthermore, Doug Ford said that we might have up to 1% of those cases resulting in hospitalizations.
LOL.
WE'VE ONLY HAD 96,349 HOSPITALIZATIONS IN ALL OF CANADA, THIS ENTIRE TIME. WHY ON EARTH WOULD WE HAVE 30,000 HOSPITALIZATIONS A MONTH IN ONTARIO ALONE, WITH A VARIANT THAT HAS BECOME WEAKER WITH TIME???
HAHAHAHAHA. You can't make this up.
Check out the updated Canadian hospitalization data which is CLEARLY SHOWN BELOW, and obviously refutes the nonsense that Doug Ford has warned about.
HAHAHAHA, you can't make this up.
https://covid19tracker.ca/provincevac.html?p=ON
You’re wrong Matt.
The unvaccinated are 200 times more likely to spread the virus.
-
Huh? A negative test means you don't have COVID. A positive test means you do. Sometimes the tests results are wrong.
Last week, a friend of mine texted me to tell me he had COVID. He tested positive with the rapid antigen test, and then went to the hospital, and tested positive on the PCR test.
He asked the fat man at the hospital what the cycle threshold of the PCR test was, and he said he didn't know. ::) Nice to see educated people who know what their jobs are, are overseeing this pandemic.
But anyway, my friend tested positive for COVID on both tests.
I will ask his permission to see if I can post his name here - because he is a real person, and I'd rather post with credibility, by posting real details.
Anyway, I IMMEDIATELY got in touch with him.
I shared his drink out of his glass, used his plate, and basically just tried to get COVID.
Nine days later, I'm fine.
At this point, I have offered $200 to ANYONE WHO CAN GIVE ME COVID.
And I haven't gotten a successful response yet.
LOL, some pandemic.
-
Last week, a friend of mine texted me to tell me he had COVID. He tested positive with the rapid antigen test, and then went to the hospital, and tested positive on the PCR test.
He asked the fat man at the hospital what the cycle threshold of the PCR test was, and he said he didn't know. ::) Nice to see educated people who know what their jobs are, are overseeing this pandemic.
But anyway, my friend tested positive for COVID on both tests.
I will ask his permission to see if I can post his name here - because he is a real person, and I'd rather post with credibility, by posting real details.
Anyway, I IMMEDIATELY got in touch with him.
I shared his drink out of his glass, used his plate, and basically just tried to get COVID.
Nine days later, I'm fine.
At this point, I have offered $200 to ANYONE WHO CAN GIVE ME COVID.
And I haven't gotten a successful response yet.
LOL, some pandemic.
You’re not kidding anyone Matt.
We all know you don’t have $200.
😉
-
The vaccine doesn't do anything to stop the spread of COVID, apparently. Or at least - the government is doing everything possible to prove that, lol.
You’re wrong Matt.
The unvaccinated are 200 times more likely to spread the virus.
So why is Ontario locking down again, and why is Saskatchewan attempting to follow suit?
There are only 3,082,664 unvaccinated people in Ontario, of whom 723,016 are children under age five, who can't get vaccinated...and who clearly aren't a problem, given that only 1,259 CANADIANS aged 0-11 were hospitalized IN TOTAL, SINCE THE START OF THIS PANDEMIC, IN ALL OF CANADA, and another 142 were admitted to the ICU [see data below].
That means there are only 2,359,648 [3,082,664 minus 723,016 ] people in Ontario aged 5+ who are unvaccinated.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Ontario
A good portion of that ~2.36M will be children aged 5-11, who only started getting vaccinated a month or two ago. And, again, small children aren't getting hospitalized for COVID to any serious degree, as they have robust immune systems.
Most of the children who have been "hospitalized from COVID" are fake news cases like 14-year-old Nathanael Spitzer from Alberta, who quack doctor Deena Hinshaw included as a COVID death, until the family made a Facebook post that blew up [got like 100,000+ shares], stating that Nathanael was tested for COVID TWO DAYS BEFORE DYING OF TERMINAL BRAIN CANCER, AND WAS INCLUDED [THEN REMOVED] AS A COVID DEATH.
LOL, you can't make this up.
If sooooo many healthy people are dying of this virus, why would the government need to fake cases like that? ::) LMAO, what a crock.
Go search for Nathanael Spitzer online, and see for yourself. Assuming the news hasn't all been memory-holed yet. ::)
So tell me:
-
You’re not kidding anyone Matt.
We all know you don’t have $200.
😉
$100 to be exposed to someone with COVID, and $100 if I successfully get the virus.
$200 seems like a bit of a waste if I don't actually successfully get it.
And I think $100 is worth someone's time to see me while they are infected. I mean, I am getting a service here. I think the rates I set are fair.
Speaking of money:
I'm basically set at this point on just living off my savings, moving forward. It makes me angry, because I feel I should do something.
But what?
I'm not wearing a mask, I'm not getting vaccinated [yet - until this shit-show subsides a little...assuming I ever do], and I REFUSE to work in a "Woke [W-OAK]" or social justice culture.
So that's why I'm just sitting around at home - and I have no intention of evet working again.
It upsets me that our society is such a social justice shit-show, but I want NOTHING to do with it.
I'll make a seal with you right now, OAK:
You find me a job that allows me to be unvaccinated, without wearing a mask, and has no social justice bullshit involved in it...and I'll apply for that job, ok?
That's what I've been telling my family and friends - I'll wait until some time between April 1st and May 1st. Then I'm unlike to ever apply for a job again.
-
$100 to be exposed to someone with COVID, and $100 if I successfully get the virus.
$200 seems like a bit of a waste if I don't actually successfully get it.
And I think $100 is worth someone's time to see me while they are infected. I mean, I am getting a service here. I think the rates I set are fair.
Speaking of money:
I'm basically set at this point on just living off my savings, moving forward. It makes me angry, because I feel I should do something.
But what?
I'm not wearing a mask, I'm not getting vaccinated [yet - until this shit-show subsides a little...assuming I ever do], and I REFUSE to work in a "Woke [W-OAK]" or social justice culture.
So that's why I'm just sitting around at home - and I have no intention of evet working again.
It upsets me that our society is such a social justice shit-show, but I want NOTHING to do with it.
I'll make a seal with you right now, OAK:
You find me a job that allows me to be unvaccinated, without wearing a mask, and has no social justice bullshit involved in it...and I'll apply for that job, ok?
That's what I've been telling my family and friends - I'll wait until some time between April 1st and May 1st. Then I'm unlike to ever apply for a job again.
You should run as an MLA.
Work from home at full salary if you’re not vaccinated.
😉
-
$100 to be exposed to someone with COVID, and $100 if I successfully get the virus.
$200 seems like a bit of a waste if I don't actually successfully get it.
And I think $100 is worth someone's time to see me while they are infected. I mean, I am getting a service here. I think the rates I set are fair.
Speaking of money:
I'm basically set at this point on just living off my savings, moving forward. It makes me angry, because I feel I should do something.
But what?
I'm not wearing a mask, I'm not getting vaccinated [yet - until this shit-show subsides a little...assuming I ever do], and I REFUSE to work in a "Woke [W-OAK]" or social justice culture.
So that's why I'm just sitting around at home - and I have no intention of evet working again.
It upsets me that our society is such a social justice shit-show, but I want NOTHING to do with it.
I'll make a seal with you right now, OAK:
You find me a job that allows me to be unvaccinated, without wearing a mask, and has no social justice bullshit involved in it...and I'll apply for that job, ok?
That's what I've been telling my family and friends - I'll wait until some time between April 1st and May 1st. Then I'm unlike to ever apply for a job again.
Matt,
Why feed this troll ? Nothing it says is true, funny or even vaguely entertaining.
-
You’re wrong Matt.
The unvaccinated are 200 times more likely to spread the virus.
Is that information accurate? That sounds a little high.
You should run as an MLA.
Work from home at full salary if you’re not vaccinated.
😉
I think my mom mentioned in that.
As I said, I will look into working until April 1st or May 1st. After that - I AM DONE.
Our society is fucked. There are McDonald's fry cooks wearing masks. ::)
Could you imagine working for minimum wage while wearing a mask WITHOUT HAVING COVID, in that extreme heat, for hours at a time???
IMO, that is employee abuse.
That's why I'm not exactly rushing to find work. ::)
However, I feel like I should be contributing to society in some way. But there's nothing for me that meets my standards.
Our economy is also fucked. This is the most economically unstable time in my life.
Canada is borrowing $500 MILLION DAILY to deal with COVID.
I wonder what will happen when the Shylocks lending the money ask for it back. Time will tell.
Something's gotta give.
-
Is that information accurate? That sounds a little high.
I think my mom mentioned in that.
As I said, I will look into working until April 1st or May 1st. After that - I AM DONE.
Our society is fucked. There are McDonald's fry cooks wearing masks. ::)
Could you imagine working for minimum wage while wearing a mask WITHOUT HAVING COVID, in that extreme heat, for hours at a time???
IMO, that is employee abuse.
That's why I'm not exactly rushing to find work. ::)
However, I feel like I should be contributing to society in some way. But there's nothing for me that meets my standards.
Our economy is also fucked. This is the most economically unstable time in my life.
Canada is borrowing $500 MILLION DAILY to deal with COVID.
I wonder what will happen when the Shylocks lending the money ask for it back. Time will tell.
Something's gotta give.
Finally something we can agree on.
Government spending gone wild! Don’t get me started.
My kids will be paying for this pandemic for the rest of their lives.
🙁