Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Gym-Rat on February 09, 2022, 10:39:14 AM

Title: taking in the homeless
Post by: Gym-Rat on February 09, 2022, 10:39:14 AM
what you say libtards?? got room?

lol lol lol lol
ha ha ha ha

crazy crime
crazy criminals
wow libs are demented  ::)

Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Matt on February 09, 2022, 01:25:21 PM
Haha, they import millions of poor people into the world, and then wonder why people are poor.  ;D
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Kwon on February 09, 2022, 01:26:22 PM
TAKING IN THE POOPER
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/a73850228f154d9573cece27b79cac9f/c1c7775a9c869c25-03/s1280x1920/28285044499b30e0dffa1122d992d8b6caf62efc.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/08eb47d290937994fc65decd70f547ce/c1c7775a9c869c25-a7/s1280x1920/a6392577db6de688c5f0687d7ce49127967a1318.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/ba2b23c29df792f12b22df3eb71d4ad8/c1c7775a9c869c25-61/s1280x1920/1bc6c817222442dd6a141b26e78be3f1bf78ab6e.jpg)
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: IronMagazine.com on February 09, 2022, 01:55:59 PM
I say this country needs a real life purge.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Dave D on February 09, 2022, 02:36:47 PM
The governmental body that wants so much control, shut down businesses and livelihoods, told the people when and where they could go, how to celebrate the holidays (also they imported the homeless from out of state) is now ASKING the public to fix the problem they created?

That’s some leadership.

How about we invest money back into mental health facilities?
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: ThisisOverload on February 09, 2022, 02:43:17 PM
All Liberal voters should be required to house all the immigrants and homeless people.

It would change our society completely in a matter of months.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Irongrip400 on February 09, 2022, 03:34:47 PM
TAKING IN THE POOPER
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/a73850228f154d9573cece27b79cac9f/c1c7775a9c869c25-03/s1280x1920/28285044499b30e0dffa1122d992d8b6caf62efc.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/08eb47d290937994fc65decd70f547ce/c1c7775a9c869c25-a7/s1280x1920/a6392577db6de688c5f0687d7ce49127967a1318.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/ba2b23c29df792f12b22df3eb71d4ad8/c1c7775a9c869c25-61/s1280x1920/1bc6c817222442dd6a141b26e78be3f1bf78ab6e.jpg)


Poopar, poof too!
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Taffin on February 09, 2022, 04:02:11 PM
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/ba2b23c29df792f12b22df3eb71d4ad8/c1c7775a9c869c25-61/s1280x1920/1bc6c817222442dd6a141b26e78be3f1bf78ab6e.jpg)(http://i.postimg.cc/G3jkDJfS/Buzz-Hardyear.gif)
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: tommywishbone on February 09, 2022, 04:09:14 PM
TAKING IN THE POOPER
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/a73850228f154d9573cece27b79cac9f/c1c7775a9c869c25-03/s1280x1920/28285044499b30e0dffa1122d992d8b6caf62efc.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/08eb47d290937994fc65decd70f547ce/c1c7775a9c869c25-a7/s1280x1920/a6392577db6de688c5f0687d7ce49127967a1318.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/ba2b23c29df792f12b22df3eb71d4ad8/c1c7775a9c869c25-61/s1280x1920/1bc6c817222442dd6a141b26e78be3f1bf78ab6e.jpg)

OK. We have a problem. Geographically there's no way she can wipe her ass.

Arm length and ass circumference do not work.

That's a problem.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Thin Lizzy on February 09, 2022, 04:20:28 PM
It’s like the ass version of a Monster Truck:
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Thin Lizzy on February 09, 2022, 04:26:26 PM
Regarding the topic, Libs are too bound to their ideology to see that their big government policies, whether it be healthcare, education or housing, make things more expensive:
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: AbrahamG on February 09, 2022, 11:46:20 PM
The governmental body that wants so much control, shut down businesses and livelihoods, told the people when and where they could go, how to celebrate the holidays (also they imported the homeless from out of state) is now ASKING the public to fix the problem they created?

That’s some leadership.

How about we invest money back into mental health facilities?

This right here.  Never should have de-funded mental health in the 1st place.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: obsidian on February 10, 2022, 12:07:27 AM
what you say libtards?? got room?

lol lol lol lol
ha ha ha ha

crazy crime
crazy criminals
wow libs are demented  ::)


All celebrities should open their homes. Arnold should open his mansion and have a homeless family in each bedroom. Do the right thing Arnie! Get to the homeless camp!
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: obsidian on February 10, 2022, 12:08:16 AM
TAKING IN THE POOPER
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/a73850228f154d9573cece27b79cac9f/c1c7775a9c869c25-03/s1280x1920/28285044499b30e0dffa1122d992d8b6caf62efc.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/08eb47d290937994fc65decd70f547ce/c1c7775a9c869c25-a7/s1280x1920/a6392577db6de688c5f0687d7ce49127967a1318.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/ba2b23c29df792f12b22df3eb71d4ad8/c1c7775a9c869c25-61/s1280x1920/1bc6c817222442dd6a141b26e78be3f1bf78ab6e.jpg)
HAHA! Kwon you always deliver!
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: BRUTALIFTRUE on February 10, 2022, 12:55:12 AM
Prolly gives a great Blumpkin
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Gym-Rat on February 10, 2022, 12:56:30 AM
Prolly gives a great Blumpkin

welcome b.i.t!
a legend in the making already, just with that user-name!
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: IroNat on February 10, 2022, 04:04:45 AM
Kwon!!!!

(https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ef/c0/4e/efc04e9aba551d8bb5ea351be2db6408.gif)
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Taffin on February 10, 2022, 09:13:06 AM
OK. We have a problem. Geographically there's no way she can wipe her ass.

Arm length and ass circumference do not work.

That's a problem.

Tommy -

Trust me, if I got my hands on that, she'd never need to wipe it again!

(http://i.postimg.cc/Zqf5KXXM/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: tommywishbone on February 10, 2022, 09:16:07 AM
 :D

You are a kind and considerate man to help her with her problem. 
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Fortress on February 10, 2022, 10:17:18 AM
Madness.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: bhank on February 10, 2022, 10:41:35 AM
Multifamily zoning would help create more affordable housing which might not solve but would certainly alleviate the problem. Increase minimum wage would also help especially in areas with a higher cost of living.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: funk51 on February 10, 2022, 11:02:46 AM
   
    AMERIKA
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Dave D on February 10, 2022, 01:23:52 PM
Multifamily zoning would help create more affordable housing which might not solve but would certainly alleviate the problem. Increase minimum wage would also help especially in areas with a higher cost of living.

Bhanks being in the industry youre in you would think you'd understand trickle down economics. The minimum wage in San Francisco is already higher than the federal level. Wages have gone up and so have costs. They travel hand in hand.

Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Primemuscle on February 10, 2022, 01:28:02 PM
Haha, they import millions of poor people into the world, and then wonder why people are poor.  ;D

If the poor people are imported into the world, does this mean they come from another planet? How does that work, Matt? Maybe that's not what you meant to write.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Primemuscle on February 10, 2022, 01:41:22 PM
Multifamily zoning would help create more affordable housing which might not solve but would certainly alleviate the problem. Increase minimum wage would also help especially in areas with a higher cost of living.

I agree with you about multifamily zoning creating more affordable housing. Many homeless probably would qualify for low-income housing if it were available which at least in the Portland Metro area is not the case. Just the other day I read where a builder who agreed to include low-income rentals has waffled on that agreement. The builder/owner of the property often gets tax breaks, which they should lose if they fail to keep their end of the bargain.

As the minimum wage has increased so has parttime employment. Better wages...fewer hours...income doesn't increase. Not only that but those employers can avoid paying/providing benefits to parttime employees such as sick leave and group medical insurance. It's inevitable that the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer.   
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: IroNat on February 10, 2022, 02:26:07 PM
TAKING IN THE POOPER
(https://64.media.tumblr.com/a73850228f154d9573cece27b79cac9f/c1c7775a9c869c25-03/s1280x1920/28285044499b30e0dffa1122d992d8b6caf62efc.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/08eb47d290937994fc65decd70f547ce/c1c7775a9c869c25-a7/s1280x1920/a6392577db6de688c5f0687d7ce49127967a1318.jpg)(https://64.media.tumblr.com/ba2b23c29df792f12b22df3eb71d4ad8/c1c7775a9c869c25-61/s1280x1920/1bc6c817222442dd6a141b26e78be3f1bf78ab6e.jpg)

                                                  (https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e6/98/46/e698462d452a97d38e13c14b30d89e1b.gif)
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Matt C on February 13, 2022, 03:13:57 PM
If the poor people are imported into the world, does this mean they come from another planet? How does that work, Matt? Maybe that's not what you meant to write.

Into the FIRST world.  Sorry, my bad.  :)
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Primemuscle on February 13, 2022, 03:24:47 PM
Into the FIRST world.  Sorry, my bad.  :)
Cool.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: pamith on February 13, 2022, 04:35:53 PM
I say this country needs a real life purge.
My nikka
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Matt C on February 13, 2022, 04:44:58 PM
Cool.

Primemuscle,

Would you invite a homeless person to live in your house?

The answer is no.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: WalterWhite on February 13, 2022, 05:02:43 PM
what you say libtards?? got room?

lol lol lol lol
ha ha ha ha

crazy crime
crazy criminals
wow libs are demented  ::)



Newscum and Hagelosi should be the first to house them.  Oh and the SF mayor's salary of 343k should go to the street poopers.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Marty Champions on February 13, 2022, 05:03:42 PM
Ca gov newsom bought 6000 rentals
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Agnostic007 on February 13, 2022, 09:53:29 PM
All Liberal voters should be required to house all the immigrants and homeless people.

It would change our society completely in a matter of months.

On the same note, if we could get conservatives to take in all the babies and children in orphanages  that would help a lot as well.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Primemuscle on February 13, 2022, 10:26:46 PM
Primemuscle,

Would you invite a homeless person to live in your house?

The answer is no.

Why do you ask the same questions repeatedly when you think you already know the answer? The truth is you are wrong. So, I will humor you.

A young woman who was my cousin's coworker in the early 70's got pregnant. She either quit or was fired from her job. She was on the outs with her parents. My wife and I took her in until her baby came and she was eligible for ADC.

Several years ago, my nephew got himself into trouble with the law and spent some time in jail. When he was released, we took him in until he got a job and got on back his feet.

One of my cousins moved to Oregon until he found work and could afford his own place, we took him in.

The elder of my two sisters lived with us twice. Once when she was about 16 and again after she and her husband divorced and she had nowhere to go.

After a very traumatic event my wife's sister moved in. She lived with us for several months until she felt safe enough to rent an apartment which was next door to our house.

Homeless people are often just regular folks who are temporarily down on their luck.

If you are asking if I would take in a homeless person today. The answer is I have no room. Right now, every bedroom is occupied. My grandson, his fiancé and their baby girl are currently living here until they can get enough funds together to rent
their own place. If that were not the case and I knew someone who needed a leg up, I'd take them in. Chances are, I would not give someone who I did not know at all or had no previous connection with a place to stay.

When I was five years old my parents separated. Neither of them was able to properly care for me. I lived with several relatives and a few hired people care givers until I was eight and moved to California to live with my mom and stepdad. Technically, I was homeless almost an orphan.
 

Although she not really homeless, my wife and I had just gotten married when my aunt and uncle separated. Their daughter did not want to live with either of them, so she moved in with us. She was 15 years old at the time. She stayed with us until she was eighteen after which she got a place of her own. Sometimes when she was moving from one place to another she'd stay with us for a short while.

My two sisters came to stay with us when our mother was ill. They stayed for about a year.

If more people were willing to open their homes to people they trusted and who were in need of a place to live, there would be a few less homeless people living on the streets.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Mayday on February 13, 2022, 10:41:31 PM
My understanding from across the ocean is homeless moved there because of homeless benefits?

Therefore by trying to ‘help’ the homeless they increased the number of homeless.

Showing you can’t simply give a homeless person $600/mth and it solves homeless people problems. They have massive substance issues along with mental issue so they’re likely fucked regardless of how much money you give them.

I have NFI how to solve that issue btw but I know it isn’t inviting drug addicted people with mental health issues into your home.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Matt C on February 13, 2022, 10:48:26 PM
Why do you ask the same questions repeatedly when you think you already know the answer? The truth is you are wrong. So, I will humor you.

A young woman who was my cousin's coworker in the early 70's got pregnant. She either quit or was fired from her job. She was on the outs with her parents. My wife and I took her in until her baby came. born and she was eligible for ADC. Several years ago, my nephew got himself into trouble with the law and spent some time in jail. When he was released, we took him in until he got a job and got on back his feet. One of my cousins moved to Oregon until he found work and could afford his own place, we took him in.

Homeless people are often just regular folks who are temporarily down on their luck.

Interesting.  I find that liberal Democrats are the most hypocritical, intolerant, nasty people.  Insofar as liberals and leftists leave me alone, I don't wish any ill will upon them.  As they continue to encroach into my life through their various failed policies, I do push back though.  Having the police charged recently was a big step for me.  I called the police yesterday [Saturday night], and told them I will have an armed standoff over the illegal vaccine passport on a date between April 1st and May 1st, if the illegal system is not stopped by then.

The police stated that I would not be allowed in the facility I wish to train at, and I would be removed as an "unwanted person".  I tried to explain to the police cadet taking the call that medical information is protected in Canada, and doubly protected under Ontario law - that I absolutely CANNOT be removed from a facility for not revealing my private medical status.

I don't know how many times this needs to be said, but under Canadian law, you absolutely cannot demand a person's vaccination status nor can you ask for ANY OTHER PRIVATE MEDICAL INFORMATION.  Period, bar none.

But what does this have to do with liberals and leftists?

Ah, you see, Prime - it is your side, the insane far-left, that is doing this.  It is your side that is now making it illegal for me to GO TO A GYM AND TRAIN, to maintain my physical and mental health, because the batshit crazies on your side are afraid of a virus that is 99% survivable, and more like 99.99% survivable for someone who is my age and health status.

That's the left doing that - and I am very bitter about it.  As I said, I'd be fine just living it alone, but you keep pushing it, and the left is basically pushing things to the point of civil war.  And if it comes to that, I can guarantee you - it's not the gun-owning right-wing that will be eliminated.  I can guarantee you that.

Best-case scenario: even if the Western left DOES win, there will be a SHIT LOAD of casualties on your side.  Like in WWII, when the Nazis "lost" [lmao].  Yeah, in case you didn't notice - 50% of deaths were Allied CIVILIANS.  Hardly a "victory", really.

But the left keeps pushing it, Prime.  Now to a point where I can train at the facility I've been a member at for over 20 years, or take my children to a restaurant on their birthdays.  Even if I was vaccinated, I couldn't take my daughter out to her birthday when she turns five years, because SHE wouldn't be vaccinated on the day of her 5th birthday.

I know someone who can't currently go to the gym because he is waiting for his booster - which isn't scheduled for a couple more weeks.  He did everything right, and he STILL can't go to the gym!  And THIS is why the left is insane, and why I just want you insanoids to stay out of my life.

Looks like I will be in a very bad situation with the police come April or May, as there is zero chance I will be putting up with this illegal vaccine passport system by then.  Sounds like Canadians on the whole are starting to not tolerate it...but time will tell.  They REALLY overplayed their hand this time out [Western governments].

Fucking psychos.

Of course, you and other leftists WANT that to happen.

And I always find that you and other leftists refuse to practice what you preach.  You praise the homeless, but wouldn't ever do anything for a homeless person.

So with that, I am amazed you actually did something for someone, Prime.  I expected a much more selfish life history from you.  I am shocked you did something nice for a homeless person.  Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that was a good thing.  I'm just saying I am surprised to see a leftist practice what he preaches.

If you are asking if I would take in a homeless person today. The answer is I have no room. Right now, every bedroom is occupied. My grandson, his fiancé and their baby girl are currently living here until they can get enough funds together to rent
their own place. If that were not the case and I knew someone who needed a leg up, I'd take them in. Chances are, I would not give someone who I did not know at all or had no previous connection with a place to stay.

When I was five years old my parents separated. Neither of them was able to properly care for me. I lived with several relatives and a few hired people care givers until I was eight and moved to California to live with my mom and stepdad. Technically, I was homeless almost an orphan.

If more people were willing to open their homes to people they trusted and who were in need of a place to live, there would be a few less homeless people living on the streets.

Good.  Neither would I.

The idea that homeless people are good people, and just "down on their luck" is just a bullshit narrative, fed to people by leftist scumbags.  By and large, homeless people are sad, pathetic pieces of shit, and got into the situation they did by being lazy girls, or worse yet - thieving pieces of shit garbage humans who stole from family and friends.

If your little fantasy about homeless people was accurate, you and other leftists wouldn't avoid the homeless LIKE THE PLAGUE.

Don't get me wrong - SO DO I.

The difference is - you claim to tolerate the homeless.

I don't.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Matt C on February 13, 2022, 10:51:48 PM
My understanding from across the ocean is homeless moved there because of homeless benefits?

Therefore by trying to ‘help’ the homeless they increased the number of homeless.

Showing you can’t simply give a homeless person $600/mth and it solves homeless people problems. They have massive substance issues along with mental issue so they’re likely fucked regardless of how much money you give them.

I have NFI how to solve that issue btw but I know it isn’t inviting drug addicted people with mental health issues into your home.

Exactly, exactly, exactly.  This x1,000.

This is why I simply can't stand left-wing dumb shits, and just want them out of my life.  God, I feel like this fucking assholes completely scammed me out of a life history until around age 25, when I figured this out.  Fucking bastards, lying to me about the nature of people, when in reality it is just, as you said, that these homeless people are drug-addicted pieces of shit, who will just have a greater addiction if you give them money.

Of course we get more poor people if we build a whole industry around poverty.  I think Kenya's population went from something like 25 million in 1985, and 50 million in 2015, because of increased levels of aid.  So WHO EXACTLY WAS SAVED?

Now we have TWICE as many Kenyan people, including Kenyan children, starving to death?  HOW IS THAT A GOOD THING?
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Kwon on February 14, 2022, 04:06:23 AM
WHO DEY
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Matt C on February 14, 2022, 04:10:29 AM
WHO DEY

Dey = the children of Gosiame Sithole.

Do you remember GO SITHOLE?:

Quote
South African 10 babies story not true, inquiry finds

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-57581054
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Kwon on February 14, 2022, 04:42:36 AM
Dey = the children of Gosiame Sithole.

Do you remember GO SITHOLE?:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-57581054

GO SHITHOLE? Yeah i rememember.



DO WHEY
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Griffith on February 14, 2022, 06:30:32 AM
First World country of peace.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: robcguns on February 14, 2022, 06:39:23 AM
Honestly just go around and shoot all the homeless cause the majority are drug addicts and lazy fucking drinks. 90% will never do anything anyways.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Gym-Rat on February 14, 2022, 06:42:06 AM
maybe ugly nancy can build some shelters with the millions she made with insider stock trading recently
you know, the bleeding-heart hypocrites
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Svengoolie on February 14, 2022, 06:50:11 AM
No good deed...I'm surprised she wasn't raped as well.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10509901/Homeless-man-arrested-slashed-throat-woman-let-home-shower.html

Quote
Homeless man is arrested after he ‘slashed throat of Salt Lake City Good Samaritan who let him into her home to shower’, leaving victim critically-ill in hospital
Eric Jones, 30, was arrested on an aggravated assault charge after he allegedly slashed a woman's throat last Sunday

The victim, who lived in Salt Lake City, had welcomed Jones into her apartment so he could take a shower
Police say he assaulted her - causing her to bleed heavily and need emergency surgery - in what appears to be a 'random attack' before fleeing the scene
He was arrested early Friday morning approximately two miles from the scene of attack and is currently being held in the Salt Lake County Metro Jail
The victim's condition was since been downgraded from critical to stable

A homeless man is facing aggravated assault charges after he slashed the throat of a Utah woman who opened her home to him so he could shower.

Eric Jones, 30, allegedly assaulted the unidentified woman last Sunday at her Salt Lake City apartment in what police say appears to be a 'random attack'.

When police arrived to her apartment, the victim - whose identity is being withheld due to a request for privacy - was 'bleeding heavily'.

She was taken to an area hospital in critical condition and underwent emergency surgery, according to a police press release. Doctors have since downgraded her to stable condition.

Jones was arrested early Friday morning approximately two miles from the scene of the attack. He was taken to the Salt Lake County Metro Jail and booked on one count of aggravated assault.

Eric Jones, 30, is facing aggravated assault charges after he slashed the throat of a Utah woman who invited him into her Salt Lake City apartment so he could take a shower

Jones was taken to he Salt Lake County Metro Jail (pictured) and booked on one count of aggravated assault. His bond is set at $10,000
+3
View gallery
Jones was taken to he Salt Lake County Metro Jail (pictured) and booked on one count of aggravated assault. His bond is set at $10,000

Salt Lake City officers responded to 850 West Temple Street just before 5pm on Sunday, February 6 for reports of a woman bleeding.

Preliminary investigation revealed the woman had welcomed Jones who she described as 'being homeless,' into her residence to take a shower. 

It remains unclear if Jones knew the victim prior to the incident.




Salt Lake City detective Michelle Mechling told Fox 13 the suspect, later identified as Jones, attacked the woman and fled the scene.

Officers administered first aid to the victim at her home until paramedics were able to transport her to the hospital.

In wake of the incident, Mechling warned residents: 'It goes along with – know who you’re letting into your house and don’t let people you don’t know into your house.'

According to inmate records, Jones currently remains in jail. His bond is set at $10,000.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Primemuscle on February 14, 2022, 10:32:51 PM
Interesting.  I find that liberal Democrats are the most hypocritical, intolerant, nasty people.  Insofar as liberals and leftists leave me alone, I don't wish any ill will upon them.  As they continue to encroach into my life through their various failed policies, I do push back though.  Having the police charged recently was a big step for me.  I called the police yesterday [Saturday night], and told them I will have an armed standoff over the illegal vaccine passport on a date between April 1st and May 1st, if the illegal system is not stopped by then.

The police stated that I would not be allowed in the facility I wish to train at, and I would be removed as an "unwanted person".  I tried to explain to the police cadet taking the call that medical information is protected in Canada, and doubly protected under Ontario law - that I absolutely CANNOT be removed from a facility for not revealing my private medical status.

I don't know how many times this needs to be said, but under Canadian law, you absolutely cannot demand a person's vaccination status nor can you ask for ANY OTHER PRIVATE MEDICAL INFORMATION.  Period, bar none.

But what does this have to do with liberals and leftists?

Ah, you see, Prime - it is your side, the insane far-left, that is doing this.  It is your side that is now making it illegal for me to GO TO A GYM AND TRAIN, to maintain my physical and mental health, because the batshit crazies on your side are afraid of a virus that is 99% survivable, and more like 99.99% survivable for someone who is my age and health status.

That's the left doing that - and I am very bitter about it.  As I said, I'd be fine just living it alone, but you keep pushing it, and the left is basically pushing things to the point of civil war.  And if it comes to that, I can guarantee you - it's not the gun-owning right-wing that will be eliminated.  I can guarantee you that.

Best-case scenario: even if the Western left DOES win, there will be a SHIT LOAD of casualties on your side.  Like in WWII, when the Nazis "lost" [lmao].  Yeah, in case you didn't notice - 50% of deaths were Allied CIVILIANS.  Hardly a "victory", really.

But the left keeps pushing it, Prime.  Now to a point where I can train at the facility I've been a member at for over 20 years, or take my children to a restaurant on their birthdays.  Even if I was vaccinated, I couldn't take my daughter out to her birthday when she turns five years, because SHE wouldn't be vaccinated on the day of her 5th birthday.

I know someone who can't currently go to the gym because he is waiting for his booster - which isn't scheduled for a couple more weeks.  He did everything right, and he STILL can't go to the gym!  And THIS is why the left is insane, and why I just want you insanoids to stay out of my life.

Looks like I will be in a very bad situation with the police come April or May, as there is zero chance I will be putting up with this illegal vaccine passport system by then.  Sounds like Canadians on the whole are starting to not tolerate it...but time will tell.  They REALLY overplayed their hand this time out [Western governments].

Fucking psychos.

Of course, you and other leftists WANT that to happen.

And I always find that you and other leftists refuse to practice what you preach.  You praise the homeless, but wouldn't ever do anything for a homeless person.

So with that, I am amazed you actually did something for someone, Prime.  I expected a much more selfish life history from you.  I am shocked you did something nice for a homeless person.  Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that was a good thing.  I'm just saying I am surprised to see a leftist practice what he preaches.

Good.  Neither would I.

The idea that homeless people are good people, and just "down on their luck" is just a bullshit narrative, fed to people by leftist scumbags.  By and large, homeless people are sad, pathetic pieces of shit, and got into the situation they did by being lazy girls, or worse yet - thieving pieces of shit garbage humans who stole from family and friends.

If your little fantasy about homeless people was accurate, you and other leftists wouldn't avoid the homeless LIKE THE PLAGUE.

Don't get me wrong - SO DO I.

The difference is - you claim to tolerate the homeless.

I don't.

You are even worse than The Coach. When you don't get the answer you want you not only ignore the topic, you convolute the answer. Is this common practice among right wing people?

As to your upcoming gym showdown I hope you get a wake up call before it is too late. I guess mama can bail you out if the police don't shoot you for being an annoying cunt.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Dave D on February 14, 2022, 10:51:53 PM
You are even worse than The Coach. When you don't get the answer you want you not only ignore the topic, you convolute the answer. Is this common practice among right wing people?

As to your upcoming gym showdown I hope you get a wake up call before it is too late. I guess mama can bail you out if the police don't shoot you for being an annoying cunt.

What was his question? Would you take in the homeless?

I saw you had an answer about taking in family members, and we know that is something you still do (even though i'm sure living with them isnt taking them in,  but my point is made nonetheless) but I'm sure Matthews question was about the actual homeless who are non relatives.

Our country, and our leaders, has abandoned the mentally ill.
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: French on February 15, 2022, 12:06:45 AM
why we don't see that in Florida seeing homeless all over the place ?
Title: Re: taking in the homeless
Post by: Gym-Rat on February 15, 2022, 01:22:56 AM
prime takes people in at "casa de cawk-cavity"
successful people that family, need to live with/sleaze off a groin-gravy gagging-geezer  ::)