Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Matt on April 29, 2022, 08:40:27 AM
-
Gay men = "men who have sex with men", which includes bisexual too.
I'm sure we will see an increase in AIDS infected blood, as was the case in 1989-1990, which caused the ban in the first place.
-
Do insane left-wing Social Justice Warriors not understand why these laws are in place to begin with?
Why do these stupid fucks NEED to produce an increase in AIDS infected blood donations before we simply REINSTATE THE BAN?
-
So are you gonna finally start donating blood then Matt
(https://blog.epmainc.com/wp-content/uploads/willy%20wonka%20meme.jpg)
-
didn't it used to be if you had a tattoo you couldn't donate blood ??
being gay and having tattoos isn't too diff
j/k
-
So are you gonna finally start donating blood then Matt
(https://blog.epmainc.com/wp-content/uploads/willy%20wonka%20meme.jpg)
Lol!!
Possibly, yes. But not for the reasons implied in your post. ;D
Truth be told, I am somewhat concerned about the blood supply. Trudeau claims he has studies showing this is safe, but gay men are something like 4% of Canada's population, but comprise 72% of HIV and AIDS patients. :-\
And it's not like they don't test - it's that the tests aren't perfect.
I don't think it's easy to test for HIV infected blood. That's why it was decided to prevent it from coming in to begin with.
But whatever. People will die, and the policy will just be reversed anyway.
Someone on YouTube said this is just a way tp hide the VAIDS caused by the jabs. I don't know if that is true, but I had never thought of it.
-
didn't it used to be if you had a tattoo you couldn't donate blood ??
being gay and having tattoos isn't too diff
j/k
Correct. At least here in Canada.
We also had a requirement to be 105-lb.
Possibly because Tim Fogarty's numerous friends with AIDS were under 105-lb.
On that note, I'm starting to think AIDS may have been bullshit.
It's probably just some anal sex HPV.
As for "AIDS", you had gay men smoking meth full-time - no shit they ended up withering away.
I suspect that was just a correlation thing.
-
Isn't Canada pro lgbt?
I am somewhat appalled i must say.
-
Lol!!
Possibly, yes. But not for the reasons implied in your post. ;D
Truth be told, I am somewhat concerned about the blood supply. Trudeau claims he has studies showing this is safe, but gay men are something like 4% of Canada's population, but comprise 72% of HIV and AIDS patients. :-\
And it's not like they don't test - it's that the tests aren't perfect.
I don't think it's easy to test for HIV infected blood. That's why it was decided to prevent it from coming in to begin with.
But whatever. People will die, and the policy will just be reversed anyway.
Someone on YouTube said this is just a way tp hide the VAIDS caused by the jabs. I don't know if that is true, but I had never thought of it.
They have that new drug (prep) that I'm assuming most gays now take and that prevents getting and spreading HIV. I'm presuming that's why the guidelines for donating have changed as they now have enough data to conclude the risk is sufficiently low/on par with hetros.
-
Where I donate they ask if you ever had sex with a man ( I assume they don’t ask women) if you answer no it says “ not even once?” Which I always thought sounded funny but I asked the lady can’t they just lie?
She said they test all blood not taking anyone’s word for it.
-
Why do these stupid fucks NEED to produce an increase in AIDS infected blood donations before we simply REINSTATE THE BAN?
Why does stupid fuck like you not know that donated blood is tested so it won't endanger anyone? If anything, someone who's positive may find out about it this way, which is a positive thing overall to stop any unintentional spread.
-
;D
-
They have that new drug (prep) that I'm assuming most gays now take and that prevents getting and spreading HIV. I'm presuming that's why the guidelines for donating have changed as they now have enough data to conclude the risk is sufficiently low/on par with hetros.
PrEP does not prevent, it reduces the risk.
Not to split hairs, but there is a big difference between the two.
-
Gay men = "men who have sex with men", which includes bisexual too.
I'm sure we will see an increase in AIDS infected blood, as was the case in 1989-1990, which caused the ban in the first place.
You are risking offending all the real, “open-minded” men who are “comfortable with their sexuality” here, who condone man-on-man anal ramming , and all the pathologies that come from it and the “lifestyle” that goes along with it.
Men who don’t condone it are “secretly gay” because they’re repulsed by such an act.
I mean, that’s what all the real men of the current day think, along within occasional cross dressing and LARPing as a homosexual.
-
They have that new drug (prep) that I'm assuming most gays now take and that prevents getting and spreading HIV. I'm presuming that's why the guidelines for donating have changed as they now have enough data to conclude the risk is sufficiently low/on par with hetros.
I hope it's something like this.
The MSM and risk factor ban was in place for a reason, and it was indeed from contaminated blood making it through testing.
Trudeau says they spent $5,000,000 on testing, and found that AIDS potential blood was not a risk.
I hope that's true, and not virtue-signalling.
Trudeau is the same person who sought to not have Covid vaccine deaths reported. If that stupid fuck TRULY believed the vaccines were safe, why not report on the data? ::)
There's not a single view of someone opposed to me that I want hidden, because I know those views just make my own look good. And ultimately, I just believe I free speech and free inquiry.
-
Why does stupid fuck like you not know that donated blood is tested so it won't endanger anyone? If anything, someone who's positive may find out about it this way, which is a positive thing overall to stop any unintentional spread.
Because tests are far from perfect, and the HIV test is especially so.
There is going to be far more HIV infected blood coming in - that much is certain. Will the tests uncover it? According to Trudeau, yes. He said studies show this - you know, the same "studies" that made him spend a TRILLION dollars for a virus that has killed 85 people in over two years in my city of 108K.
I don't trust him. But time will tell.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Commission_of_Inquiry_on_the_Blood_System_in_Canada
-
You are risking offending all the real, “open-minded” men who are “comfortable with their sexuality” here, who condone man-on-man anal ramming , and all the pathologies that come from it and the “lifestyle” that goes along with it.
Men who don’t condone it are “secretly gay” because they’re repulsed by such an act.
I mean, that’s what all the real men of the current day think, along within occasional cross dressing and LARPing as a homosexual.
These are the same degenerate perverts that defend Rocco Siffredi. I should be grateful for that sick fuck - he has so sufficiently turned me off from fucking, I will never get an STD, at least.
-
I actually donated blood today because they’ve been hounding me and since my hematocrit has been creeping up. I always think of Getbig when answering the multiple gay, HIV and steroid questions on the iPad. “Have you ever had sex with another male. Even if it was only once.” Wish I could write in IOGIYWITB. They also make it fairly enticing with the gift cards. Ended up with $45 and a free t-shirt that I will probably donate to that shirtless Jewboy Mike Katz.
-
Because tests are far from perfect, and the HIV test is especially so.
Well that was the 80s - almost 40 years go. The blood test is close to 100% accurate now. There's always some level of risk, so by using that logic, no blood is safe - whether is from a heterosexual person or gay.
-
PrEP does not prevent, it reduces the risk.
Not to split hairs, but there is a big difference between the two.
From what I know it's 99% effective for an individual, so in that example it reduces the risk and yes there is a big difference between 99% effective and 100% when it comes to numbers (see covid)
What I assumed is if the majority, or better yet everyone were to take it then eventually its effectiveness approaches closer to or 100% or at least on par with hetros. Is that wrong?
-
From what I know it's 99% effective for an individual, so in that example it reduces the risk and yes there is a big difference between 99% effective and 100% when it comes to numbers (see covid)
What I assumed is if the majority, or better yet everyone were to take it then eventually its effectiveness approaches closer to or 100% or at least on par with hetros. Is that wrong?
The Big Pharma companies behind the drug PrEP claim 99% protection against HIV for sexual transmission and 74% for intravenous drug users.
Claimed, with limited testing and data results available to support the claim.
Have we not learned anything over the past two years about claims of protection or drug/vaccine efficacy ? Have we forgotten the CDC mask claims or FDA Covid claims ?
-
The Big Pharma companies behind the drug PrEP claim 99% protection against HIV for sexual transmission and 74% for intravenous drug users.
Claimed, with limited testing and data results available to support the claim.
Have we not learned anything over the past two years about claims of protection or drug/vaccine efficacy ? Have we forgotten the CDC mask claims or FDA Covid claims ?
To be honest as a no homo man I know very little about the drug other than the 99% effective claim. I was just trying to go from A to B in a straight line for Matts sake, not down another rabbit hole
-
The Big Pharma companies behind the drug PrEP claim 99% protection against HIV for sexual transmission and 74% for intravenous drug users.
Claimed, with limited testing and data results available to support the claim.
Have we not learned anything over the past two years about claims of protection or drug/vaccine efficacy ? Have we forgotten the CDC mask claims or FDA Covid claims ?
???
Not sure where you get 'limited testing and data results' from. The efficacy of PrEP has been confirmed in multiple studies across different countries involving thousands of participants over several years--in both private & publicly funded studies. It's one of the most well-supported medical therapies for ANY disease or illness.
-
The Big Pharma companies behind the drug PrEP claim 99% protection against HIV for sexual transmission and 74% for intravenous drug users.
Claimed, with limited testing and data results available to support the claim.
Have we not learned anything over the past two years about claims of protection or drug/vaccine efficacy ? Have we forgotten the CDC mask claims or FDA Covid claims ?
well don´t worry ...my jizz is clean baby
-
You do realize that every single unit of blood donated is tested for HIV and other diseases. Right? No of course you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have made such an insipid thread.
-
Matt, you continue to be the forums biggest loser.
-
The Big Pharma companies behind the drug PrEP claim 99% protection against HIV for sexual transmission and 74% for intravenous drug users.
Claimed, with limited testing and data results available to support the claim.
Have we not learned anything over the past two years about claims of protection or drug/vaccine efficacy ? Have we forgotten the CDC mask claims or FDA Covid claims ?
That's right - they have forgotten already.
I'm reminded of this:
[Idi Amin] was not there the day I rang (a son said he was out of town), but locals said he could often be seen pushing his cart along the frozen food section of the supermarket, being massaged at the health club, praying at the mosque. He had long ago abandoned his British-style military uniform for the white robe of the Saudi man, but as an African measuring 6-foot-3 and nearly 300 pounds, he did not exactly blend in.
A former Sudanese colonel who worked as a manager at the local supermarket said, ''People greet him and say, 'Hello, Mr. President.' ''
Why? Wasn't he a savage dictator?
''Oh yes -- he used to eat people,'' the manager replied, laughing. ''But this is our nature. We forget.''
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/19/opinion/editorial-notebook-the-obscenely-easy-exile-of-idi-amin.html
But I remember the absolute shit-show surrounding the vaccine efficacy lies:
-
Matt, you continue to be the forums biggest loser.
Brutal if true
-
Matt, you continue to be the forums biggest loser.
He is the perpetual victim. If he's not feeling aggrieved when he wakes up he scours the internet for some new bullshit that will never impact his life and bitches about it incessantly.
-
You do realize that every single unit of blood donated is tested for HIV and other diseases. Right? No of course you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have made such an insipid thread.
Wow - why didn't I EVER think of that?
I mean WHY ON EARTH were blood banks asking any questions? What with the blood "being tested", and all that. Clearly this system is absolutely perfect, has no human error [like vials ABC being confirmed HIV, but medical workers accidentally tossing out vials XYZ simply by accident], and it's not like gay men at 4% of the population make up 72% of the HIV and AIDS population.
THIS ALREADY HAPPENED in 1989-1990. Tainted blood resulted in 20,000 hepatitis cases, close to 10,000 HIV cases, and thousands of deaths.
There is a reason why this legislation was in place.
-
Matt, you continue to be the forums biggest loser.
Yet you opened my thread. ::)
Dude - I don't read ANY of your threads. For the time being, I still read your posts [although I'll end up putting you on block soon enough if you remain such a stupid asshole who apparently NEVER makes a factual point], but I never open your threads.
What the fuck are you doing my threads and communicating with me? Do I EVER communicate with you, aside from mundane bodybuilding stuff? GTFO of my threads if you don't like what I post! This isn't complicated.
The only person I have on block on here is Walter Sobchak. I've only read one of his posts in the past five months, accidentally, before I was informed about the Ignore User option. And yet he's STILL posting in my Amber Heard thread. What a FUCKING LOSER! I can assure you, I haven't read a word that dude says, but unfortunately, the Ignore User feature still shows that the person you are ignoring posted something [it's just blocked/covered].
Man, just stop reading my threads!
-
He is the perpetual victim. If he's not feeling aggrieved when he wakes up he scours the internet for some new bullshit that will never impact his life and bitches about it incessantly.
I never claimed to be the victim regarding this blood ban.
What would you call living under house arrest essentially for two years, being legally barred from going to restaurants and theatres [which I personally could not give a FUCK about], and gyms [which I absolutely DO care about]?
This wasn't like your neck of the woods where they literally had limited hours for gyms for a few months and had PSA's recommending to wash your hands after taking a shit.
I wasn't some fake victim there. I had to go way out of my way to settle my matter legally before Canada got rid of the bullshit mandates. I literally had to sneak to a gym that the owner allowed me to train, being followed there by the police, probably twice a week.
My gym owner was given a fake mask fine, that the government has no legal way to collect. But here's my point: all that is FUCKING EXHAUSTING.
I'm sure things would have gone much more easily if I just wore a mask, and lined up to be a lab rat for Big Pharma. ::) But no, I stood my ground, and it WAS not only mentally draining, but FUCKING OF COURSE I WAS THE VICTIM. The government has and continues to act illegally, and took away my rights and closed gyms for months.
And then what happened? All mandates [except air travel] ended by late last month. And - SURPRISE, SURPRISE - everything is fine with me now.
But I will stay it's a bit disturbing to me how people went along with literally ignoring Canadian law. I am absolutely confident we are literally one riot away from potentially enacting. And that's disturbing, but hey - things are good here for now.
As for this HIV blood ban - did I CLAIM to be a victim here? In this thread? As I said - I'm not a victim here.
But there's a reason why these policies are in place. Primarily because testing is far from perfect. Have we learned NOTHING from the 50% false positive PCR tests for COVID? ???
Lastly, AbrahamG - I called you out for "knowing" four people who died of Covid. Was that so wrong?
Considering 68% of those who died of Covid had SIX OR MORE underlying diseases, and 78% were overweight or obese, and over 50% were over 75 years old, the odds of you knowing four people who died of Covid, among average health, average weight, middle aged people,is extremely unlikely.
Mathematically, it's like you telling me you have four friends who won a lottery of $50,000 or more. It's possible...just very unlikely.
But anyway, post their obituaries, and I'll investigate their cases and see if they had underlying illness. If I'm wrong about this, I'll personally apologize to you publicly on here.
-
why are you always taking about queers ?
Am I? ???
Oh...Tim Fogarty.
Well, to clarify: there's no need to paint me as all kinds of things here. The issue with the blood ban is that it targeted RISKY SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR.
Say for example, I was drunk and got raped by a man. I WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DONATING BLOOD.
Simply because that form of sex results in a shit-load more STD's, on average.
I think this is a stupid public health policy. I think this is dangerous because blood testing is not perfect, and people are going to die.
That's why I'm talking about it. It's no disrespect to homosexuals - but this is dangerous.
Unless testing truly is better [close to perfect], in which case it may be fine. But Trudeau said they spent $5 million studying it, but didn't name the studies. So I don't believe him.
-
I was relieved to read the changes here - it looks like anal sex is still being screened.
THAT makes sense. As I've said before, homosexual "tops" are not at much increased risk for HIV compared to heterosexual men. Yes, there is a slightly increased risk of getting HIV if you are a man GIVING anal sex compared to a man having vaginal sex with a woman, but it's not THAT much higher a risk [something like 1 in 2,400 compares to 1 in 2,000 risk of infection].
Whereas receiving anal sex from a man who has HIV puts your risk at 1 in 125! :o That's an insane risk, and explains why rates of HIV are so much higher in the gay male community.
But it looks like they are still targeting gay male BOTTOMS, and that's a good thing - because it's RECEIVING anal sex that is the issue:
Starting no later than Sept. 30, potential donors will be asked if they have had new or multiple sexual partners in the past three months, no matter their gender or sexual orientation. If any potential donor replies yes, they will then be asked whether they have had anal sex with any of those partners. If they have, they will need to wait three months since that activity before donating blood. In its decision, the federal government noted that anal sex with new or multiple partners is associated with elevated risk of HIV transmission.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-health-canada-ends-ban-on-blood-donations-from-gay-men/
PS - I apologize to anyone who is offended to learn about the risks of various forms of sex. ???
-
Lol!!
Possibly, yes. But not for the reasons implied in your post. ;D
Truth be told, I am somewhat concerned about the blood supply. Trudeau claims he has studies showing this is safe, but gay men are something like 4% of Canada's population, but comprise 72% of HIV and AIDS patients. :-\
And it's not like they don't test - it's that the tests aren't perfect.
I don't think it's easy to test for HIV infected blood. That's why it was decided to prevent it from coming in to begin with.
But whatever. People will die, and the policy will just be reversed anyway.
Someone on YouTube said this is just a way tp hide the VAIDS caused by the jabs. I don't know if that is true, but I had never thought of it.
They should test the blood...oh wait they do
-
Say for example, I was drunk and got raped by a man. I WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DONATING BLOOD.
lol, I'm pretty certain no straight man, shit even the homo men on here sit around musing such things.
Seriously get your shit together Matt. Get a fucking job even if it's just stacking shelves or something, do some volunteer work and get some more hobbies.
-
didn't it used to be if you had a tattoo you couldn't donate blood ??
being gay and having tattoos isn't too diff
j/k
What's the position on someone straight but with a gay tattoo..?
-
Sodomy is still a crime. Sodomy legally defined as "any person who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offence."
-
Where I donate they ask if you ever had sex with a man ( I assume they don’t ask women) if you answer no it says “ not even once?” Which I always thought sounded funny but I asked the lady can’t they just lie?
She said they test all blood not taking anyone’s word for it.
;D
I've got this idea now that someone fucking about set the sequence tree of questions after you've mentioned you lift weights to just keep going, something like...
"Ever had sex with a man?
Not even once?
Not even rubbed c0cks together?
How about cupping balls?
Ever admired another mans 'purdy' lips?
Ever watched 'Brokeback Mountain' and cried?
It's OK to say yes, you know, IOGIYWITB"
Etc, etc, ad infinitum ;D ;D
-
Yet you opened my thread. ::)
Dude - I don't read ANY of your threads. For the time being, I still read your posts [although I'll end up putting you on block soon enough if you remain such a stupid asshole who apparently NEVER makes a factual point], but I never open your threads.
What the fuck are you doing my threads and communicating with me? Do I EVER communicate with you, aside from mundane bodybuilding stuff? GTFO of my threads if you don't like what I post! This isn't complicated.
The only person I have on block on here is Walter Sobchak. I've only read one of his posts in the past five months, accidentally, before I was informed about the Ignore User option. And yet he's STILL posting in my Amber Heard thread. What a FUCKING LOSER! I can assure you, I haven't read a word that dude says, but unfortunately, the Ignore User feature still shows that the person you are ignoring posted something [it's just blocked/covered].
Man, just stop reading my threads!
tl;dr
You are still the biggest loser.
Walter Sobchak owns your loser mind.
-
tl;dr
You are still the biggest loser.
Walter Sobchak owns your loser mind.
I MADE MATT CANNING CRY.
I MADE MATT CANNING MELTDOWN.
I MADE MATT CANNING LOSE A POLL TO LEAVE GETBIG - WHICH HE LOST AND NEVER LEFT.
I OWN MATT CANNING’S FEEBLE MIND.
I SHOULD HAVE WON A 2021 GETBIG AWARD!
-
Holy fuck there's a few more soy boys running around on getbig these days.
-
Holy fuck there's a few more soy boys running around on getbig these days.
Turn your monitor on ;D
-
Gay as fuck.
-
tl;dr
You are still the biggest loser.
Walter Sobchak owns your loser mind.
The reason why I come to Getbig is to advance myself intellectually. I went to university, and I can honestly say that I have learned more on Getbig than I ever did it there.
And I can say I learn something from just about everyone's posts here.
The reason why I don't learn much from your posts lately is because you're not making points. You're just throwing around insults.
What am I supposed to learn from your posts?
If you had a specific point, I could learn from it, or analyze it or something.
As for Walter Sobchak - from what I could see from his replies to everyone, all he does is call people gay, and insult them - even their families at times.
WHY IN THE FUCK would I want to read a bunch of posts of someone responding to someone and saying "You most love big dicks in your mouth"? LET ALONE IF THOSE POSTS ARE DIRECTED TO ME.
Am I supposed to JUMP FOR JOY? "WOW!! I JUST GOT CALLED A HOMO OUT OF THE BLUE AFTER RESPONDING TO A THREAD ABOUT JAY CUTLER FAILING THE DIURETICS TEST IN 2001. THIS GUY IS INCREDIBLE!"
Who the FUCK would want to read that?
Do you know why your posts aren't blocked on here, SF1900?
Because other than your posts trashing me lately, when you are commenting on the posts of OTHER MEMBERS, you have interesting and cool things to say. So when I'm reading your posts [again - unless you are addressing me, when you insult me], your posts are worth reading.
With Walter Sobchak, there wasn't one post that he ever made, if I recall correctly, where he wasn't calling someone a homosexual.
It's also extreme fucking weird - I've probably literally been accused or questioned about being gay maybe three times in my life. It's literally the weirdest fucking accusation I've faced.
It would be akin to someone accusing me of wearing a hairpiece and NEVER SHUTTING THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT. He also accused B. Hank of being gay, Rob C. Guns, and probably others I don't recall. What an absolute fucking weirdo.
But he still reads my threads, which is even more baffling. I enjoy the long stretches of time I don't see him here - then unfortunately, I see the "You Are Blocking This User" notice in threads.
I will say - I am extremely grateful to have that feature - it's one thing to simply see a blocked post notification...it was much worse to see his posts accidentally, while trying to scroll past it.
Take my word for it - I wouldn't think twice if that guy left the board permanently. As for his previous posts owning my mind - FUCKING OF COURSE I was offended by his posts.
By and large - I get along with most people on here. Even those who disagree with me, I am on relatively good terms with. WHY THE FUCK would I want to read posts calling me gay and bashing my family, calling me weak, etc? What do you think I gain from some faceless guy calling me weak?
If any Getbigger wanted to do an "Add 50-lb to your bench" challenge, I'd be game. But some anonymous coward to claim to be stronger than me? Again - ask yourself, WHAT DOES THAT BENEFIT ME?
FYI, I have not blocked your posts, SF1900. I do wish you'd actually engage with my points, rather than insult me, but I don't read your posts for the replies to me.
Your posts/replies to others are sufficiently high in quality for me to read them. Also, you add value to the board in general. I don't particularly feel that about your replies to me - but I meant in general.
That being said, if you hate my posts - just use the Ignore User feature for me, dude!
Sincerely, it would not be my intention to offend you. But if you are offended, I do think you should block me. For your own sake.
-
Brutal if true
Bro...
-
Bro...
My nikka
-
Wow - why didn't I EVER think of that?
I mean WHY ON EARTH were blood banks asking any questions? What with the blood "being tested", and all that. Clearly this system is absolutely perfect, has no human error [like vials ABC being confirmed HIV, but medical workers accidentally tossing out vials XYZ simply by accident], and it's not like gay men at 4% of the population make up 72% of the HIV and AIDS population.
THIS ALREADY HAPPENED in 1989-1990. Tainted blood resulted in 20,000 hepatitis cases, close to 10,000 HIV cases, and thousands of deaths.
There is a reason why this legislation was in place.
STFU. You were not talking about about 1989-1990. You were talking present day, so don't try to quantify it with from a previous era with less knowledge. Then you try to support your insipid whining with a "what if" scenario. Seriously, just stop breathing the air that some plants may need.
Fucking incel.
-
The reason why I come to Getbig is to advance myself intellectually. I went to university, and I can honestly say that I have learned more on Getbig than I ever did it there.
And I can say I learn something from just about everyone's posts here.
The reason why I don't learn much from your posts lately is because you're not making points. You're just throwing around insults.
What am I supposed to learn from your posts?
If you had a specific point, I could learn from it, or analyze it or something.
As for Walter Sobchak - from what I could see from his replies to everyone, all he does is call people gay, and insult them - even their families at times.
WHY IN THE FUCK would I want to read a bunch of posts of someone responding to someone and saying "You most love big dicks in your mouth"? LET ALONE IF THOSE POSTS ARE DIRECTED TO ME.
Am I supposed to JUMP FOR JOY? "WOW!! I JUST GOT CALLED A HOMO OUT OF THE BLUE AFTER RESPONDING TO A THREAD ABOUT JAY CUTLER FAILING THE DIURETICS TEST IN 2001. THIS GUY IS INCREDIBLE!"
Who the FUCK would want to read that?
Do you know why your posts aren't blocked on here, SF1900?
Because other than your posts trashing me lately, when you are commenting on the posts of OTHER MEMBERS, you have interesting and cool things to say. So when I'm reading your posts [again - unless you are addressing me, when you insult me], your posts are worth reading.
With Walter Sobchak, there wasn't one post that he ever made, if I recall correctly, where he wasn't calling someone a homosexual.
It's also extreme fucking weird - I've probably literally been accused or questioned about being gay maybe three times in my life. It's literally the weirdest fucking accusation I've faced.
It would be akin to someone accusing me of wearing a hairpiece and NEVER SHUTTING THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT. He also accused B. Hank of being gay, Rob C. Guns, and probably others I don't recall. What an absolute fucking weirdo.
But he still reads my threads, which is even more baffling. I enjoy the long stretches of time I don't see him here - then unfortunately, I see the "You Are Blocking This User" notice in threads.
I will say - I am extremely grateful to have that feature - it's one thing to simply see a blocked post notification...it was much worse to see his posts accidentally, while trying to scroll past it.
Take my word for it - I wouldn't think twice if that guy left the board permanently. As for his previous posts owning my mind - FUCKING OF COURSE I was offended by his posts.
By and large - I get along with most people on here. Even those who disagree with me, I am on relatively good terms with. WHY THE FUCK would I want to read posts calling me gay and bashing my family, calling me weak, etc? What do you think I gain from some faceless guy calling me weak?
If any Getbigger wanted to do an "Add 50-lb to your bench" challenge, I'd be game. But some anonymous coward to claim to be stronger than me? Again - ask yourself, WHAT DOES THAT BENEFIT ME?
FYI, I have not blocked your posts, SF1900. I do wish you'd actually engage with my points, rather than insult me, but I don't read your posts for the replies to me.
Your posts/replies to others are sufficiently high in quality for me to read them. Also, you add value to the board in general. I don't particularly feel that about your replies to me - but I meant in general.
That being said, if you hate my posts - just use the Ignore User feature for me, dude!
Sincerely, it would not be my intention to offend you. But if you are offended, I do think you should block me. For your own sake.
MATT CANNING IS A CRYBABY HOMOSEXUAL.
WHO WENT TO UNIVERSITY….HAHAHAHAHAHA!
IT’S LIKE FORREST GUMP WORKING A GLORYHOLE.
-
even the dog is homo :D
-
MATT CANNING IS A CRYBABY HOMOSEXUAL.
WHO WENT TO UNIVERSITY….HAHAHAHAHAHA!
IT’S LIKE FORREST GUMP WORKING A GLORYHOLE.
"A gloryhole is like a box of chocolates... you never know what kind of d1ck you're gonna get..."
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/grFtZ8sz/awgesrdhdhddtsdtshsdh.jpg)
-
(https://i.postimg.cc/grFtZ8sz/awgesrdhdhddtsdtshsdh.jpg)
The Gloryhole Janitor.
Cleaning up and swallowing buckets of jism at a bathroom near you.
-
He is the perpetual victim. If he's not feeling aggrieved when he wakes up he scours the internet for some new bullshit that will never impact his life and bitches about it incessantly.
Thank you.
-
all blood will be tested for STDs and positive ones will get discarded anyway..
my concerns are blood from those whose HIV is still in the incubation period :-\
-
Gay Men Now Allowed to Donate Blood in Canada
Are they allowed to make a semen deposit into the "bank of bare-asses and ball-bags" ??
-
There’s already an HIV+ bakery, so why not an HIV only blood bank for bug chasers, gift givers and overall risk takers? (Nh)
-
Do insane left-wing Social Justice Warriors not understand why these laws are in place to begin with?
Why do these stupid fucks NEED to produce an increase in AIDS infected blood donations before we simply REINSTATE THE BAN?
Because as we All well Know The Leftists are Totally Ruined mentally & consequncly
Ruin all they deal with or Come into contact with. FFS
No Rational sane person would be allowing such a stupid Thing.
-
The Big Pharma companies behind the drug PrEP claim 99% protection against HIV for sexual transmission and 74% for intravenous drug users.
Claimed, with limited testing and data results available to support the claim.
Have we not learned anything over the past two years about claims of protection or drug/vaccine efficacy ? Have we forgotten the CDC mask claims or FDA Covid claims ?
Only The mentally irregular fol have forgoten.
I wonder if i gave them a bag with 100 sweats in & said Let your your Children
Choose 1 as only 1 of them is Poisoned So they're 99% safe .
-
I never claimed to be the victim regarding this blood ban.
What would you call living under house arrest essentially for two years, being legally barred from going to restaurants and theatres [which I personally could not give a FUCK about], and gyms [which I absolutely DO care about]?
This wasn't like your neck of the woods where they literally had limited hours for gyms for a few months and had PSA's recommending to wash your hands after taking a shit.
I wasn't some fake victim there. I had to go way out of my way to settle my matter legally before Canada got rid of the bullshit mandates. I literally had to sneak to a gym that the owner allowed me to train, being followed there by the police, probably twice a week.
My gym owner was given a fake mask fine, that the government has no legal way to collect. But here's my point: all that is FUCKING EXHAUSTING.
I'm sure things would have gone much more easily if I just wore a mask, and lined up to be a lab rat for Big Pharma. ::) But no, I stood my ground, and it WAS not only mentally draining, but FUCKING OF COURSE I WAS THE VICTIM. The government has and continues to act illegally, and took away my rights and closed gyms for months.
And then what happened? All mandates [except air travel] ended by late last month. And - SURPRISE, SURPRISE - everything is fine with me now.
But I will stay it's a bit disturbing to me how people went along with literally ignoring Canadian law. I am absolutely confident we are literally one riot away from potentially enacting. And that's disturbing, but hey - things are good here for now.
As for this HIV blood ban - did I CLAIM to be a victim here? In this thread? As I said - I'm not a victim here.
But there's a reason why these policies are in place. Primarily because testing is far from perfect. Have we learned NOTHING from the 50% false positive PCR tests for COVID? ???
Lastly, AbrahamG - I called you out for "knowing" four people who died of Covid. Was that so wrong?
Considering 68% of those who died of Covid had SIX OR MORE underlying diseases, and 78% were overweight or obese, and over 50% were over 75 years old, the odds of you knowing four people who died of Covid, among average health, average weight, middle aged people,is extremely unlikely.
Mathematically, it's like you telling me you have four friends who won a lottery of $50,000 or more. It's possible...just very unlikely.
But anyway, post their obituaries, and I'll investigate their cases and see if they had underlying illness. If I'm wrong about this, I'll personally apologize to you publicly on here.
Actually, normal men are the victims in the anal- and woman-worshipping West. These are the two most privileged groups to exist in all of human history. Meanwhile, abnormal men cannot explain how this benefits society, because it can’t.
-
You do realize that every single unit of blood donated is tested for HIV and other diseases. Right? No of course you didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have made such an insipid thread.
You do realize that humans make errors don't you? How do you know all blood that's donated is tested correctly and no screw ups happen? Somebody doing the testing could get the test tubes mixed up or make some other mistake. Perhaps the HIV infection is early and can't be detected?
Buildings have literally been built on the wrong lots. Numerous instances of that. There are numerous check points to prevent that from happening and yet it does.
https://www.iheart.com/content/2021-08-30-texas-couples-forever-home-accidentally-built-on-wrong-property/
Not allowing gays to donate is just one filter to prevent HIV tainted blood getting into the system. Sure some of these gays will lie on the application and say they have not had sex with another man. However having that restriction will deter some gays from donating blood.
People have actually gotten HIV from donations. So mistakes do happen. Don't be naïve / moronic LurkerNoMore.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/11/26/national/blood-of-hiv-infected-man-used-in-transfusions-source/
A man in his 60s contracted HIV after receiving blood donated by an infected man that slipped through safety checks by the Japan Red Cross Society, the health ministry and the Red Cross said Tuesday.
It is the first time since 2003 that someone has been found to have been infected with the virus apparently via a blood transfusion.
Health minister Norihisa Taumra confirmed earlier in the day that blood donated by an HIV-positive man in his 40s that slipped through safety checks was used in two transfusions at separate medical institutions. Officials are trying to determine if the other recipient got the virus.
In 2003, there was a similar case of a patient being infected with HIV-tainted blood used in a transfusion, prompting the Red Cross to strengthen its safety checks the following year.
The Red Cross said during a Tuesday meeting of the ministry’s blood program panel that it will change its current safety screening method of examining blood samples jointly in batches of 20 donations to examining every blood sample by next summer.
The ministry said the blood recipient received a transfusion in October as part of treatment for a chronic digestive disease.
The man was found to be HIV-positive during blood screening in November but had also donated blood in February that slipped through the checks and was provided to medical institutions.
It is possible the infected blood slipped through the virus-detection system because HIV levels are low during the early stage of infection.
After the virus was detected in November, the man admitted he had had risky sexual contact shortly before he donated in February, but had lied about this earlier.
The ministry now suspects the man donated blood to discover whether he was infected with HIV.
Taking this into account, the Red Cross will train doctors to better discern who could be at risk of infections when interviewing blood donors.
The man had also given blood in January 2012, but the ministry believes this donation was not tainted because because he was most likely infected either at the end of last year or beginning of this year.
-
People have actually gotten HIV from donations. So mistakes do happen. Don't be naïve / moronic LurkerNoMore.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/11/26/national/blood-of-hiv-infected-man-used-in-transfusions-source/
A man in his 60s contracted HIV after receiving blood donated by an infected man that slipped through safety checks by the Japan Red Cross Society, the health ministry and the Red Cross said Tuesday.
It is the first time since 2003 that someone has been found to have been infected with the virus apparently via a blood transfusion.
your example is one case from japan almost ten years ago--which itself was the first case in ten years?? talk about the exception that proves the rule