Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: NoPEDsNoBB on December 29, 2022, 07:07:18 PM
-
(https://i.ibb.co/LCyt9zK/ART-ATWOOD-before-and-after.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
Or was that earlier pic of him taken after gyno surgery so he couldn't work his chest for a month or something?
Because that's a huge chest improvement.
Modern day pros take note.
-
He should have stuck with the hair...
-
He should have stuck with the hair...
I'd go with the glorious pecs of peace destruction.
-
Gained 400% chest mass
Lossed 40% hair
= huge bhanks-like win
-
Art had such an odd physical appearance.
It was amazing he won a pro card.
-
Art had such an odd physical appearance.
It was amazing he won a pro card.
Was he a ManHo?
-
Art had such an odd physical appearance.
It was amazing he won a pro card.
I believe he won his class (Super-Heavyweight) at the 2001 Nationals, the same year that Branch Warren (heavyweight) and Johnnie Jackson (light-heavyweight and overall) turned pro.
-
Was he a ManHo?
Most likely
(https://i.ibb.co/WcZfDWK/2002-mr-olympia-146-20090831-1018771312.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
-
If he stayed on the before pic regimen he'd probably still be alive and he looked way hotter (no homo, no homo!)
-
If he stayed on the before pic regimen he'd probably still be alive and he looked way hotter (no homo, no homo!)
Nothing is hotter than huge glorious muscles
(https://i.ibb.co/p1YcQjr/Rambo-nothing.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(no schmoe)
-
Shrink the rest of your body by dying early
-
He performed incline DB presses at a 27.7525-degree angle and "flexed at the top".
It's the only way to build the "upper" chest.
-
What killed him was a combination of gear and rec drugs. He was big into rec drugs
He was big in person, 5’11 and 300 pounds walking around
Having a heart attack and falling into the pool isn’t a pleasant way of dying, if the pool wasn’t there for him to fall into, there’s a slight chance he’ll be alive
-
What killed him was a combination of gear and rec drugs. He was big into rec drugs
He was big in person, 5’11 and 300 pounds walking around
Having a heart attack and falling into the pool isn’t a pleasant way of dying, if the pool wasn’t there for him to fall into, there’s a slight chance he’ll be alive
It's sad Art couldn't swim.
-
Had a minor heart attack unknowingly about a month before he died of the big one apparently.
-
Art the Clown
-
He performed incline DB presses at a 27.7525-degree angle and "flexed at the top".
It's the only way to build the "upper" chest.
Seriously, I want to know exactly how he trained dem titties.
-
Took his secrets to the grave.
-
Was he a ManHo?
No
-
I heard that he was always floating around the pool. Is swimming the secret holy grail of pec exercises?
-
Dave Jacobs
-
(https://i.ibb.co/LCyt9zK/ART-ATWOOD-before-and-after.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
Or was that earlier pic of him taken after gyno surgery so he couldn't work his chest for a month or something?
Because that's a huge chest improvement.
Modern day pros take note.
That is a night and day difference.
-
He`s useless to us now!
-
(https://i.ibb.co/LCyt9zK/ART-ATWOOD-before-and-after.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
Or was that earlier pic of him taken after gyno surgery so he couldn't work his chest for a month or something?
Because that's a huge chest improvement.
Modern day pros take note.
It’s strange his chest got bigger but his arms made almost no improvement.
-
“Dead Man Floating” could be the movie name for a film about him.
People like him have zero concept of future ramifications.
-
Art went from having the world's worst chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
to the world's best chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
(https://i.ibb.co/84dWx68/Art-Atwood-251303366-d17e1bbcf9.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/wcq6mMx/art-atwood.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/ynjLd4T/Art-Atwood-0073-2514.jpg) (https://ibb.co/0jbPmsN)
(https://i.ibb.co/XxxFffM/tumblr-mssmuu-HJj-S1s18tkko1-400.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/VVCw8p8/CGf-Nz-VIAAfgf-G.jpg) (https://ibb.co/sj1WrJr)
More proof that genetics mean f-all in bodybuilding.
-
“Dead Man Floating” could be the movie name for film about him.
People like him have zero concept of future ramifications.
Great post. I'm reminded of Brian Shaw.
-
What types of wood dont float??
Natalie Wood and Atwood??
-
He`s useless to us now!
:'(
-
Roland would have wrecked Attwood
-
^^^^Great shot!!
-
Art went from having the world's worst chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
to the world's best chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
(https://i.ibb.co/84dWx68/Art-Atwood-251303366-d17e1bbcf9.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/wcq6mMx/art-atwood.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/ynjLd4T/Art-Atwood-0073-2514.jpg) (https://ibb.co/0jbPmsN)
(https://i.ibb.co/XxxFffM/tumblr-mssmuu-HJj-S1s18tkko1-400.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/VVCw8p8/CGf-Nz-VIAAfgf-G.jpg) (https://ibb.co/sj1WrJr)
More proof that genetics mean f-all in bodybuilding.
Genetics is everything in bodybuilding. Art didn’t have them, but he was a hard worker.
Genetics in terms of proportions and response to AAS. Milos has said time and time again Flex had the best of both.
-
How did he bring up his pecs? Here's a clue:
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/sports/27steroids.html and https://www.ironmagazine.com/2008/art-atwood-deal-with-feds-in-steroid-bust/
and this blast from the past:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=344642.0
-
What killed him was a combination of gear and rec drugs. He was big into rec drugs
He was big in person, 5’11 and 300 pounds walking around
Having a heart attack and falling into the pool isn’t a pleasant way of dying, if the pool wasn’t there for him to fall into, there’s a slight chance he’ll be alive
What does that have to do with -> how did he build his chest?
Roland would have wrecked Attwood
What does that have to do with -> how did Atwood build his chest?
Genetics is everything in bodybuilding. Art didn’t have them, but he was a hard worker.
Genetics in terms of proportions and response to AAS. Milos has said time and time again Flex had the best of both.
(https://i.ibb.co/Br0724w/hysterical-laughter.gif) (https://imgbb.com/) (https://i.ibb.co/CnmbwYp/happiness-laughing.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/QjGy9H9/laughing-bastards.jpg) (https://ibb.co/bRnc1v1)
-
How did he bring up his pecs? Here's a clue:
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/sports/27steroids.html and https://www.ironmagazine.com/2008/art-atwood-deal-with-feds-in-steroid-bust/
and this blast from the past:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=344642.0
So what you're telling me is..
He went from being huge all over - except his chest
to being huge all over
because - steroids? ???
-
NoPEDsNoBB:
I have no muscle fiber density in my chest, and my biceps are short.
I think bodybuilders have a higher concentration of muscle fiber cells. Without gear, those cells wouldn't expand very much though.
So yes, I think bodybuilding is basically all drugs. But pros tend to have a bit more potential in that they have more muscle cells.
I have no chest muscle. Not much anyway. I can't grow what I don't have.
-
NoPEDsNoBB:
I have no muscle fiber density in my chest, and my biceps are short.
I think bodybuilders have a higher concentration of muscle fiber cells. Without gear, those cells wouldn't expand very much though.
So yes, I think bodybuilding is basically all drugs. But pros tend to have a bit more potential in that they have more muscle cells.
I have no chest muscle. Not much anyway. I can't grow what I don't have.
You do and you can.
There is something you are doing incorrectly. Find out what (like Art did) and your pecs shall grow.
-
Maybe he was using a secret Weider Principle that Joe never shared with the rest of us.
Didn't atwood have a friend who was selling drugs with him that got caught and killed himself and his wife after the judge gave him 3 years probation? Not jail, but he only got probation after selling massive amounts of roids for years. Only probation and he off'd himself and his wife.
-
NoPEDsNoBB:
I have no muscle fiber density in my chest, and my biceps are short.
I think bodybuilders have a higher concentration of muscle fiber cells. Without gear, those cells wouldn't expand very much though.
So yes, I think bodybuilding is basically all drugs. But pros tend to have a bit more potential in that they have more muscle cells.
I have no chest muscle. Not much anyway. I can't grow what I don't have.
You do and you can.
There is something you are doing incorrectly. Find out what (like Art did) and your pecs shall grow.
Pec Training, Executioner style (11:25)
-
Or.....
-
So what you're telling me is..
He went from being huge all over - except his chest
to being huge all over
because - steroids? ???
Yep.
-
Art is damn lucky that he didn’t have to compete against the ‘96 Nasser
-
You do and you can.
There is something you are doing incorrectly. Find out what (like Art did) and your pecs shall grow.
It's possible my front delts are eating all my chest gains. But my chest sucks anyway.
-
I believe Art had a mail-order Russian bride.
-
I believe Art had a mail-order Russian bride.
Are the Ukrainian ones cheaper now? Asking for a friend...
-
He had good chest genetics, also he concentrated on his lower chest area, many bodybuilders worry too much about the upper pectoral muscles and neglect the lower chest area. Lower chest area is everything, dips, decline benches, dumbell pullovers, etc
-
Let's be frank here, Art Atwood looked like shit....
Arms way to small for his giant torso, looked like he overdosed on FROG-TECHtm
And the only reason he beat ruhl is because ruhl already qualified for the O and didn't need to "hold his peak" combined with the fact that the shmoe judges wanted there buttboy to qualify too.....
-
Art went from having the world's worst chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
to the world's best chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
(https://i.ibb.co/84dWx68/Art-Atwood-251303366-d17e1bbcf9.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/wcq6mMx/art-atwood.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/ynjLd4T/Art-Atwood-0073-2514.jpg) (https://ibb.co/0jbPmsN)
(https://i.ibb.co/XxxFffM/tumblr-mssmuu-HJj-S1s18tkko1-400.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/VVCw8p8/CGf-Nz-VIAAfgf-G.jpg) (https://ibb.co/sj1WrJr)
More proof that genetics mean f-all in bodybuilding.
Quite a pectoral showcase you took the time to pull together.
-
;D
Quite a pectoral showcase you took the time to pull together.
;D ;D
-
This thread is gay and my Mommy says not to read it anymore.
-
Let's be frank here, Art Atwood looked like shit....
Arms way to small for his giant torso, looked like he overdosed on FROG-TECHtm
And the only reason he beat ruhl is because ruhl already qualified for the O and didn't need to "hold his peak" combined with the fact that the shmoe judges wanted there buttboy to qualify too.....
Even if Ruhl had won, Atwood would have qualified for the Olympia by placing second. Ruhl thought Toronto would be another payday (and perhaps another motorcycle for him to sell, as he did when he won that show two years earlier).
Art went from having the world's worst chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
to the world's best chest genetics (hahahahaha "genetics")
(https://i.ibb.co/84dWx68/Art-Atwood-251303366-d17e1bbcf9.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/wcq6mMx/art-atwood.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/ynjLd4T/Art-Atwood-0073-2514.jpg) (https://ibb.co/0jbPmsN)
(https://i.ibb.co/XxxFffM/tumblr-mssmuu-HJj-S1s18tkko1-400.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
(https://i.ibb.co/VVCw8p8/CGf-Nz-VIAAfgf-G.jpg) (https://ibb.co/sj1WrJr)
More proof that genetics mean f-all in bodybuilding.
How is that first picture "bad" chest genetics?
-
Even if Ruhl had won, Atwood would have qualified for the Olympia by placing second. Ruhl thought Toronto would be another payday (and perhaps another motorcycle for him to sell, as he did when he won that show two years earlier).
How is that first picture "bad" chest genetics?
Well ok first photo, but then they got bulbous and droopy (and bouncy), an acquired taste.
-
Again, the secret is to concentrate on the lower chest, most bodybuilders concentrate way too much on the upper chest and have almost no lower chest
-
Even if Ruhl had won, Atwood would have qualified for the Olympia by placing second. Ruhl thought Toronto would be another payday (and perhaps another motorcycle for him to sell, as he did when he won that show two years earlier).
Jesus. There you are again going on about "wins" ::) Who won what, who didn't win, when he won, what if he won... every post of yours. Obsessed much?
How is that first picture "bad" chest genetics?
It's not. My first picture showing his "bad genetics" is in post #1.
-
Yep.
Makes sense.
Not.
It's possible my front delts are eating all my chest gains. But my chest sucks anyway.
Everyone's chest sucked before they built it.
Are the Ukrainian ones cheaper now? Asking for a friend...
My friend would also like to know.
-
Jesus. There you are again going on about "wins" ::) Who won what, who didn't win, when he won, what if he won... every post of yours. Obsessed much?
We're talking about bodybuilding contests. Usually, with such contests there's a WINNER.
Plus, in case you missed it, my post was in response to the ridiculous conspiracy claims that some "schmoes" powers-that-be rigged the Toronto Pro Show for Atwood to beat Ruhl, so that Atwood would qualify for the Olympia (apparently forgetting that, back then, placing top 3 would have sent Atwood to the 2002 Mr. Olympia, even if Atwood had lost to Ruhl).
It's not. My first picture showing his "bad genetics" is in post #1.
I know that (I believe I asked, "How is that first picture 'bad' chest genetics?"); and it's just as absurd. Atwood's pecs look just fine, especially considering he's somewhat smaller in that pic than he was when he as a pro.
What's the time lapse between those two shots again?
-
How did Fart Shatwood build hit lats?
-
(https://i.ibb.co/LCyt9zK/ART-ATWOOD-before-and-after.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)
Or was that earlier pic of him taken after gyno surgery so he couldn't work his chest for a month or something?
Because that's a huge chest improvement.
Modern day pros take note.
What's the time lapse between those two shots again?
Just as I figured. Based on an old MuscleMag profile on Atwood from about 20 years ago (issue 248, page 255), it appears that first pic was when he was in his late teens or early 20s. He turned pro at 27 and won the Toronto Pro at 28.
So, the time lapse appears to be at least 7 or 8 YEARS, plenty of time to build up one pecs (or any other body parts), even with so-called "bad" genetics.
-
We're talking about bodybuilding contests. Usually, with such contests there's a WINNER.
YOU're talking about bodybuilding contests (as usual). I wasn't. This thread is about HOW did Art ENLARGE his PECS.
I know that (I believe I asked, "How is that first picture 'bad' chest genetics?"); and it's just as absurd. Atwood's pecs look just fine, especially considering he's somewhat smaller in that pic than he was when he as a pro.
Ye no. Cut the bs. You were clearly talking about my "pectoral showcase" post (which is why you quoted it).
Just as I figured. Based on an old MuscleMag profile on Atwood from about 20 years ago (issue 248, page 255), it appears that first pic was when he was in his late teens or early 20s. He turned pro at 27 and won the Toronto Pro at 28.
So, the time lapse appears to be at least 7 or 8 YEARS, plenty of time to build up one pecs (or any other body parts), even with so-called "bad" genetics.
You know/remember (perhaps you don't and just sit there googling everything) a heck of a lot about who won what show in which year and contest (clearly a batshit crazy obsession you have because 95% of your posts are about that crap) but as for bodybuilding itself as a whole or on a personal level, you know f-all. Zilch.
So pipe down. Know your role. Don't get carried away. Sit. Sit.
-
How did Fart Shatwood build his lats?
sHIT
I believe.
-
YOU're talking about bodybuilding contests (as usual). I wasn't. This thread is about HOW did Art ENLARGE his PECS.
I'm aware of that; that's also why I posted two videos (the channels for which apparently got canceled on YouTube) about building pecs.
Once again, I made my post about contests, IN RESPONSE, to someone who claimed Toronto was rigged for Atwood to beat Ruhl to get him to the Olympia, which made no sense.
Ye no. Cut the bs. You were clearly talking about my "pectoral showcase" post (which is why you quoted it).
You know/remember (perhaps you don't and just sit there googling everything) a heck of a lot about who won what show in which year and contest (clearly a batshit crazy obsession you have because 95% of your posts are about that crap) but as for bodybuilding itself as a whole or on a personal level, you know f-all. Zilch.
So pipe down. Know your role. Don't get carried away. Sit. Sit.
Look who's talking. You posted two pics of Atwood, which are clearly MANY YEARS APART (late teens/early 20s vs late 20s), yet tried to pass it off as if they were fairly close.
-
I'm aware of that; that's also why I posted two videos (the channels for which apparently got canceled on YouTube) about building pecs.
Once again, I made my post about contests, IN RESPONSE, to someone who claimed Toronto was rigged for Atwood to beat Ruhl to get him to the Olympia, which made no sense.
Look who's talking. You posted two pics of Atwood, which are clearly MANY YEARS APART (late teens/early 20s vs late 20s), yet tried to pass it off as if they were fairly close.
Sit.
-
Sit.
BTW, why did you start this Atwood thread again?
Could it have ANYTHING to do with all your sniveling about how unbeatable you claim Markus Ruhl was (particularly after 2002 NOC win), only to have a certain someone remind you that Ruhl got beaten by Atwood just a week later?
-
BTW, why did you start this Atwood thread again?
Could it have ANYTHING to do with all your sniveling about how unbeatable you claim Markus Ruhl was (particularly after 2002 NOC win), only to have a certain someone remind you that Ruhl got beaten by Atwood just a week later?
Every single post of yours to me since I started posting on getbig has been fucking ridiculous and not worth my time. I can't and won't take you seriously because you're clearly a senile delusional fatkunt who's miles beneath me. You don't know shit about bodybuilding and you're fucking stupid.
Now SIT and hush.
-
Look who's talking. You posted two pics of Atwood, which are clearly MANY YEARS APART (late teens/early 20s vs late 20s), yet tried to pass it off as if they were fairly close.
I mean, look at that ^ shit. Are you serious with that shit? Must I spell it all out for you?
Nah not worth my time.
SIT!
-
Every single post of yours to me since I started posting on getbig has been fucking ridiculous and not worth my time. I can't and won't take you seriously because you're clearly a senile delusional fatkunt who's miles beneath me. You don't know shit about bodybuilding and you're fucking stupid.
Now SIT and hush.
Sniveling and name-calling, tell-tale signs you're getting owned in a discussion. The fact remains, for all your blathering about how unbeatable Markus Ruhl was (circa 2002), Art Atwood BEAT HIM in Toronto.
Ruhl dwarfed the biggest of pros? He didn't dwarf Atwood.
Nobody touches 2002 NOC version of Ruhl? Atwood did and defeated him.
As for what I know about bodybuilding...I KNOW Atwood beat Markus Ruhl, a week after Ruhl's biggest pro victory.
I also know you got triggered by that fact, which is probably why you started this Atwood-bashing thread. Then you implied that all he did was roid up and his pecs almost instantly increased in size and volume, by posting pics of him that appear to be 7 to 9 years apart.
You're not the first GOOF to try this tactic, just the next.
-
I believe Art had a mail-order Russian bride.
Their combined IQ must have eclipsed 90 Weider points.
-
Sniveling and name-calling, tell-tale signs you're getting owned in a discussion. The fact remains, for all your blathering about how unbeatable Markus Ruhl was (circa 2002), Art Atwood BEAT HIM in Toronto.
Ruhl dwarfed the biggest of pros? He didn't dwart Atwood.
Nobody touches 2002 NOC version of Ruhl? Atwood did and defeated him.
As for what I know about bodybuilding...I KNOW Atwood beat Markus Ruhl, a week after Ruhl's biggest pro victory.
I also know you got triggered by that fact, which is probably why you started this Atwood-bashing thread. Then you implied that all he did was roid up and his pecs almost instantly increased in size and volume, by posting pics of him that appear to be 7 to 9 years apart.
You're not the first GOOF to try this tactic, just the next.
Didn't read
(https://i.ibb.co/VpKs0KR/close-door-the-office.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
-
Their combined IQ must have eclipsed 90 Weider points.
I believe Art had a mail-order Russian bride.
You may be right. Per his MuscleMag International interview about 20 years ago, he married his wife, Natasha, a mere seven weeks after they met in a nightclub. She's from Minsk, Belarus.
He claims he dated his previous girlfriend for four years and that she was none too pleased about his getting hitched to a girl in less than two months.
-
Didn't read
(https://i.ibb.co/VpKs0KR/close-door-the-office.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
Of course not! When facts hurt your widdle feelings, you get all PMS-like.
-
Of course not! When facts hurt your widdle feelings, you get all PMS-like.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Listen to this old delusional senile fatkunt!
He actually thinks he beat me. That he owned me.
"you started this Atwood-bashing thread" ??? I bashed him? Umm.. no.
"Nobody touches 2002 NOC version of Ruhl? Atwood did" ??? Umm.. no.
"Then you implied that all he did was roid up and his pecs almost instantly increased in size and volume" ??? Umm.. no.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
The poor fatkunt is gone. Gone in the noggin I tells ya.
Everything he says and thinks is 100% incorrect/backwards.
He's up there with Joe Biden and should be in the 2023 Deadpool thread/list.
-
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Listen to this old delusional senile fatkunt!
He actually thinks he beat me. That he owned me.
"you started this Atwood-bashing thread" ??? I bashed him? Umm.. no.
I thought you "didn't read". Make up your mind here.
Why did you start this thread on Atwood again? Unless I'm mistaken, nobody mentioned Atwood until I pointed out that he beat Ruhl as a rookie.
"Nobody touches 2002 NOC version of Ruhl? Atwood did" ??? Umm.. no.
In case your reading ability is compromised again, at the Toronto Pro....
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=682395.0;attach=1415531;image)
"Then you implied that all he did was roid up and his pecs almost instantly increased in size and volume" ??? Umm.. no.
Ummm....YES!! That's precisely what you did.
-
I thought you "didn't read". Make up your mind here.
Why did you start this thread on Atwood again? Unless I'm mistaken, nobody mentioned Atwood until I pointed out that he beat Ruhl as a rookie.
In case your reading ability is compromised again, at the Toronto Pro....
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=682395.0;attach=1415531;image)
Ummm....YES!! That's precisely what you did.
(https://i.ibb.co/4NXVrDL/happiness-laughing.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
He's fried.
-
Nobody touches 2002 NOC version of Ruhl? Atwood did and defeated him.
Senile fucker thinks Atwood beat Ruhl at the 2002 NOC show
list goes on
and on
and on
(https://i.ibb.co/4NXVrDL/happiness-laughing.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
I'm dying :D
-
"MCWAY" understand that you are mentally ill / your brain is turning to shit and you need help. Get help now before it's too late. Do you have kids or grand kids who can look after you or something?
-
Senile fucker thinks Atwood beat Ruhl at the 2002 NOC show
list goes on
and on
and on
(https://i.ibb.co/4NXVrDL/happiness-laughing.gif) (https://imgbb.com/)
I'm dying :D
Apparently, you don't read that well.
"In case your reading ability is compromised again, at the Toronto Pro...."
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=682395.0;attach=1415531;image)
Don't tell me the almighty 2002 NOC winner couldn't keep his awesome conditioning for more than ONE WEEK to beat a rookie.
It's a good thing Atwood wasn't at NOC seven days earlier.
And that leads back to why you started this thread about Atwood in the first place.....
"MCWAY" understand that you are mentally ill / your brain is turning to shit and you need help. Get help now before it's too late. Do you have kids or grand kids who can look after you or something?
My kids don't get their feelings hurt by cold hard facts. Plus, they're still teenagers (or close to it). What's your excuse?
And while you're at it, remind the class why you started this Atwood thread.
-
Apparently, you don't read that well.
"In case your reading ability is compromised again, at the Toronto Pro...."
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=682395.0;attach=1415531;image)
Don't tell me the almighty 2002 NOC winner couldn't keep his awesome conditioning for more than ONE WEEK to beat a rookie.
It's a good thing Atwood wasn't at NOC seven days earlier.
And that leads back to why you started this thread about Atwood in the first place.....
My kids don't get their feelings hurt by cold hard facts. Plus, they're still teenagers (or close to it). What's your excuse?
And while you're at it, remind the class why you started this Atwood thread.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
No, senile fatty. It's YOU who can't read well.
YOU are the one accusing me of bashing Art Atwood when I clearly done no such thing
YOU are the one accusing me of saying Art Atwood brought up his pecs by just taking steroids when I clearly said no such thing
YOU are the one who wrote
Nobody touches 2002 NOC version of Ruhl? Atwood did and defeated him.
....................
You act like you're a bb authority when you don't have the slightest clue about bodybuilding and are a lifetime natty fatkunt who struggles to stay/get under 30% bf and just googles and posts contest info because that's all you can do/offer/contribute HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You're just like "herne". He just posts pics and you just post about contest placings. Btw LOL at thinking bb winners = best on stage. It's a pageant judged by a few corrupt biased homos half the time, dumbass.
I showed more first-hand bodybuilding knowledge in 1 recent post about shit and piss (LITERALLY SHIT AND PISS!) than you have in all your 19,000 posts here COMBINED HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
And as for you clearly thinking you're some sort of owning machine HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! I've been owning delusional fucks like you with 3x your intelligence for eons. You are an absolute nothing. No competition whatsoever. Every single one of your comebacks = incorrect and stupid af. You're a joke, McFatty.
SIT & HUSH.
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
No, senile fatty. It's YOU who can't read well.
YOU are the one accusing me of bashing Art Atwood when I clearly done no such thing
YOU are the one accusing me of saying Art Atwood brought up his pecs by just taking steroids when I clearly said no such thing
YOU are the one who wrote
....................
You act like you're a bb authority when you don't have the slightest clue about bodybuilding and are a lifetime natty fatkunt who struggles to stay/get under 30% bf and just googles and posts contest info because that's all you can do/offer/contribute HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! You're just like "herne". He just posts pics and you just post about contest placings. Btw LOL at thinking bb winners = best on stage. It's a pageant judged by a few corrupt biased homos half the time, dumbass.
Yet, when the "homos" agree with YOU, particularly about Markus Ruhl, they're great. You were the one screeching about how Markus Ruhl dwarfed everyone, how nobody could match him size-wise, how he was Thanos.
All I did was point out he lost to Atwood, and you've been butt-hurt ever since then, to the point where you started this thread.
I showed more first-hand bodybuilding knowledge in 1 recent post about shit and piss (LITERALLY SHIT AND PISS!) than you have in all your 19,000 posts here COMBINED HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
And as for you clearly thinking you're some sort of owning machine HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! I've been owning delusional fucks like you with 3x your intelligence for eons. You are an absolute nothing. No competition whatsoever. Every single one of your comebacks = incorrect and stupid af. You're a joke, McFatty.
SIT & HUSH.
If you keep quiet, nobody will know how stupid you actually sound. You LOVE using contests to show how much your favorite, Markus Ruhl, just supposedly crushed everyone, from Ronnie Coleman on down. All those pics you posted, comparing Ruhl with Dillett, with Coleman, etc. all came from CONTESTS, the very ones you claim are run by "homos".
But, all it took was one shot to point out that Ruhl lost to a rookie (Atwood), and you melt like butter on a blowtorch. The almighty Markus Ruhl couldn't keep his NOC condition for one whole week and got beat by a greenhorn.
And you've been sniveling about it ever since, which may explain why you started this Atwood thread from the start.
-
Yet, when the "homos" agree with YOU, particularly about Markus Ruhl, they're great. You were the one screeching about how Markus Ruhl dwarfed everyone, how nobody could match him size-wise, how he was Thanos.
All I did was point out he lost to Atwood, and you've been butt-hurt ever since then, to the point where you started this thread.
If you keep quiet, nobody will know how stupid you actually sound. You LOVE using contests to show how much your favorite, Markus Ruhl, just supposedly crushed everyone, from Ronnie Coleman on down. All those pics you posted, comparing Ruhl with Dillett, with Coleman, etc. all came from CONTESTS, the very ones you claim are run by "homos".
But, all it took was one shot to point out that Ruhl lost to a rookie (Atwood), and you melt like butter on a blowtorch. The almighty Markus Ruhl couldn't keep his NOC condition for one whole week and got beat by greenhorn.
And you've been sniveling about it ever since, which may explain why you started this Atwood thread from the start.
I'd call the above a win. Well said, sir.
Of course Ruhl is still alive so he beat Atwood on that point. ;D
-
I'd call the above a win. Well said, sir.
Of course Ruhl is still alive so he beat Atwood on that point. ;D
Touché :'(
-
I'd call the above a win. Well said, sir.
Of course Ruhl is still alive so he beat Atwood on that point. ;D
Atwood is more shredded these days, shredded to the bone than Ruhl
-
Yet, when the "homos" agree with YOU, particularly about Markus Ruhl, they're great. You were the one screeching about how Markus Ruhl dwarfed everyone, how nobody could match him size-wise, how he was Thanos.
All I did was point out he lost to Atwood, and you've been butt-hurt ever since then, to the point where you started this thread.
If you keep quiet, nobody will know how stupid you actually sound. You LOVE using contests to show how much your favorite, Markus Ruhl, just supposedly crushed everyone, from Ronnie Coleman on down. All those pics you posted, comparing Ruhl with Dillett, with Coleman, etc. all came from CONTESTS, the very ones you claim are run by "homos".
But, all it took was one shot to point out that Ruhl lost to a rookie (Atwood), and you melt like butter on a blowtorch. The almighty Markus Ruhl couldn't keep his NOC condition for one whole week and got beat by a greenhorn.
And you've been sniveling about it ever since, which may explain why you started this Atwood thread from the start.
HAHAHAHAHA!!
What a delusional dumbass. You're such a brain fried joke :D
Who tf's butthurt/melting here? Certainly not me. Wtf do I have to be butthurt about?
I made this thread to find out how Atwood increased the size of his pecs and to further prove that genetics in bodybuilding don't mean shit. I have always been a fan of his physique. I never criticized him or said steroids were how he brought up his pecs. It's all in your ugly head.
"You LOVE using contests to show how much your favorite, Markus Ruhl, just supposedly crushed everyone"
"All those pics you posted, comparing Ruhl with Dillett, with Coleman, etc. all came from CONTESTS"
- WOW - STILL going on about contests ::)
- And no. I don't "LOVE using contests to blah blah" Idgaf about contests (like you do), retard.
"But, all it took was one shot to point out that Ruhl lost to a rookie (Atwood), and you melt like butter on a blowtorch"
::) I couldn't care less who placed first or last in some bs bb pageant you utter moron (for the 50th time).
All I said was Ruhl's physique at 2002 NOC is the GOAT.
If Art Atwood or some other bodybuilder placed higher than Ruhl did at some point in his career then COOL STORY BRO - IDGAF. It means NOTHING. Why do you think I care? Why are you obsessed with who won what, who defeated who in a bb pageant?
You have serious issues
You are extremely stupid
Your brain is wired up incorrectly
You are delusional
You are pathetic
You are beneath me mentally and physically
You aren't worth my time (but I will keep replying and owning your fat ass so you don't think you won a contest)
You need help.
-
HAHAHAHAHA!!
What a delusional dumbass. You're such a brain fried joke :D
Who tf's butthurt/melting here? Certainly not me. Wtf do I have to be butthurt about?
I made this thread to find out how Atwood increased the size of his pecs and to further prove that genetics in bodybuilding don't mean shit. I have always been a fan of his physique. I never criticized him or said steroids were how he brought up his pecs. It's all in your ugly head.
And why did you suddenly care about Atwood's pecs (or any other body parts of his for that matter)? All the bodybuilders who have improved their chests and you JUST SO HAPPEN to pick the guy that beat Ruhl one week after Ruhl's biggest win ever. SURE!!
BTW, Where is it that you declare that you know (or have a reasonable guess) as to how he got a bigger chest, other than his obviously getting bigger ALL OVER? Contrary to another ridiculous claim, Atwood was never "huge all over -- except his chest".
If you're such a fan of his physique, then looking up an article or two of his pec training shouldn't have been that difficult. You haven't even claimed that you have an idea of how he did it. Instead, you posted side-by-side pics of him where there's obviously a time lapse of several years (perhaps, up to a DECADE).
"You LOVE using contests to show how much your favorite, Markus Ruhl, just supposedly crushed everyone"
"All those pics you posted, comparing Ruhl with Dillett, with Coleman, etc. all came from CONTESTS"
- WOW - STILL going on about contests ::)
- And no. I don't "LOVE using contests to blah blah" Idgaf about contests (like you do), retard.
Yes, you do, chucklehead. Otherwise, you wouldn't be using CONTEST PICS, comparing Ruhl with other bodybuilders.
You didn't use individual pics of Ruhl and put them against individual pics of Coleman or Dillett or Cutler. Nor did you use gym footage of those guys. You compared them in CONTESTS against each other, head up. Yet, because Ruhl LOST to those guys, you pull the "get-off-my-lawn" grumpy goofball routine and claim the shows are all rigged (except the one Ruhl actually wins, of course) and that the judges are all gay.
"But, all it took was one shot to point out that Ruhl lost to a rookie (Atwood), and you melt like butter on a blowtorch"
::) I couldn't care less who placed first or last in some bs bb pageant you utter moron (for the 50th time).
All I said was Ruhl's physique at 2002 NOC is the GOAT.
Ruhl is the GOAT at a show where he WON!! But, at a show where he got BEAT a week later, he's not so GOATy?
Did Ruhl lose his GOATness in a week? Why aren't you singing the praises of Ruhl's appearance at the Toronto Pro? Surely such GOATness doesn't disappear in a mere 7 days.
Oh, it's those "homo" judges again, the same ones that gave him FIRST PLACE at NOC. Those must not be quite as gay as the Toronto ones.
If Art Atwood or some other bodybuilder placed higher than Ruhl did at some point in his career then COOL STORY BRO - IDGAF. It means NOTHING. Why do you think I care? Why are you obsessed with who won what, who defeated who in a bb pageant?
It does mean something to you, or you wouldn't be wailing about the "homos" who didn't place Ruhl higher in those pics where you claim he dominated the likes of Dillett or Coleman. You claimed Ruhl was Thanos. But, because "Thanos" got beat at those shows, you don't like the judges; so they're all gay.
You also claimed Ruhl dwarfed everyone. But, there was that pesky rookie pro in Toronto, after whom you made this thread.
You have serious issues
You are extremely stupid
Your brain is wired up incorrectly
You are delusional
You are pathetic
You are beneath me mentally and physically
You aren't worth my time (but I will keep replying and owning your fat ass so you don't think you won a contest)
You need help.
Don't they have things like Midol for your current condition?
-
And why did you suddenly care about Atwood's pecs (or any other body parts of his for that matter)? All the bodybuilders who have improved their chests and you JUST SO HAPPEN to pick the guy that beat Ruhl one week after Ruhl's biggest win ever. SURE!!
BTW, Where is it that you declare that you know (or have a reasonable guess) as to how he got a bigger chest, other than his obviously getting bigger ALL OVER? Contrary to another ridiculous claim, Atwood was never "huge all over -- except his chest".
If you're such a fan of his physique, then looking up an article or two of his pec training shouldn't have been that difficult. You haven't even claimed that you have an idea of how he did it. Instead, you posted side-by-side pics of him where there's obviously a time lapse of several years (perhaps, up to a DECADE).
Yes, you do, chucklehead. Otherwise, you wouldn't be using CONTEST PICS, comparing Ruhl with other bodybuilders.
You didn't use individual pics of Ruhl and put them against individual pics of Coleman or Dillett or Cutler. Nor did you use gym footage of those guys. You compared them in CONTESTS against each other, head up. Yet, because Ruhl LOST to those guys, you pull the "get-off-my-lawn" grumpy goofball routine and claim the shows are all rigged (except the one Ruhl actually wins, of course) and that the judges are all gay.
Ruhl is the GOAT at a show where he WON!! But, at a show where he got BEAT a week later, he's not so GOATy?
Did Ruhl lose his GOATness in a week? Why aren't you singing the praises of Ruhl's appearance at the Toronto Pro? Surely such GOATness doesn't disappear in a mere 7 days.
Oh, it's those "homo" judges again, the same ones that gave him FIRST PLACE at NOC. Those must not be quite as gay as the Toronto ones.
It does mean something to you, or you wouldn't be wailing about the "homos" who didn't place Ruhl higher in those pics where you claim he dominated the likes of Dillett or Coleman. You claimed Ruhl was Thanos. But, because "Thanos" got beat at those shows, you don't like the judges; so they're all gay.
You also claimed Ruhl dwarfed everyone. But, there was that pesky rookie pro in Toronto, after whom you made this thread.
Don't they have things like Midol for your current condition?
LOL
as if I'm going to read all that from a brain dead moron who can't read correctly, gets posts mixed up, doesn't have a clue about bodybuilding, thinks he's right when clearly wrong.....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA what a moron
Maybe I should read it all one day for the lols. Ye I will. Maybe tomorrow.
-
Of course Ruhl is still alive so he beat Atwood on that point. ;D
(https://www.canstockphoto.com/zoom/?height=214.01083400000002&width=598.020834&id=4225623&_ts=1672995182202&scale=1.3377460357844322&left=76&top=27)