Who didn’t want to make websites for same sex marriages. The Supreme Court is on a roll. Now I don’t care if you are gay and get married but I do care if someone wants no part of it it’s considered wrong. And this shows he can choose what he wants to do and all the protestors can get bent.
Yet another win. The Dems must be losing it.
You should be allowed to turn down any business you don’t want wether it be for sex,race,religion etc… it is a few country with free thought and I think it’s wonderful.
Think he’d make an exception for a bodybuilding wrastlin website? Just schmoes getting squashed with a cock in their face.
Think he’d make an exception for a bodybuilding wrastlin website? Just schmoes getting squashed with a cock in their face.
Supreme Court's Historic Free Speech Ruling For Colorado Web Designer, with Judge Amul Thapar.
The Supreme Court is on an epic run to destroy libtard minds.
Jesus what a nerd. At least he managed to shit, if ever so gingerly, on the federalists.
Free speech, my ass. Idk how they got through the whole conversation without saying "forced labor." Remember the cake case? What's enforcement going to look like? A cop pointing his pistol at the dude's head, "I said... bake it."
I never understood the basic argument to begin with:
-You offer a service that you charge money for.
-I want to use your service and therefore pay you money.
-You tell me you do not want to serve me because I'm X, Y or Z.
-Now I think my reaction would be 'fuck off' Ill take my hard earned cash elsewhere asshole.
-But these people want to make / force someone to provide a service AND then PAY that person money for that service?
It's like the lesbian couple who sued a bakery to bake them a cake for their wedding and won (im sure it's overturned now) but now, on what should be the happiest day of your life, you're eating a cake made by someone who despises your verry existence. It's just more Dem perversion.
Why the fuck on earth would you wNt to reward someone who despises you? Weird.
I never understood the basic argument to begin with:
-You offer a service that you charge money for.
-I want to use your service and therefore pay you money.
-You tell me you do not want to serve me because I'm X, Y or Z.
-Now I think my reaction would be 'fuck off' Ill take my hard earned cash elsewhere asshole.
-But these people want to make / force someone to provide a service AND then PAY that person money for that service?
It's like the lesbian couple who sued a bakery to bake them a cake for their wedding and won (im sure it's overturned now) but now, on what should be the happiest day of your life, you're eating a cake made by someone who despises your verry existence. It's just more Dem perversion.
Why the fuck on earth would you wNt to reward someone who despises you? Weird.
You just know they jerked off in the lesbians frosting too.
Dumb kunt-lappers... ::)
Who didn’t want to make websites for same sex marriages. The Supreme Court is on a roll. Now I don’t care if you are gay and get married but I do care if someone wants no part of it it’s considered wrong. And this shows he can choose what he wants to do and all the protestors can get bent.
Yet another win. The Dems must be losing it.
You should be allowed to turn down any business you don’t want wether it be for sex,race,religion etc… it is a free country with free thought and I think it’s wonderful.
I think it was a ridiculous ruling. Not because of the outcome but the fact that she never even had gay client to ask her to create a website. This was no Masterpiece Bakery issue
She manufacturered a lawsuit out of thin air and the Supreme Court should have tossed it for having no standing. She is going to get her ass beaten for pulling this stunt
I never understood the basic argument to begin with:Exactly. Business transactions are a two way street between the customer and the business. If either party doesn't want to take part in the transaction they should have that freedom. Being in business does not mean you are a slave.
-You offer a service that you charge money for.
-I want to use your service and therefore pay you money.
-You tell me you do not want to serve me because I'm X, Y or Z.
-Now I think my reaction would be 'fuck off' Ill take my hard earned cash elsewhere asshole.
-But these people want to make / force someone to provide a service AND then PAY that person money for that service?
It's like the lesbian couple who sued a bakery to bake them a cake for their wedding and won (im sure it's overturned now) but now, on what should be the happiest day of your life, you're eating a cake made by someone who despises your verry existence. It's just more Dem perversion.
Why the fuck on earth would you wNt to reward someone who despises you? Weird.
I think it was a ridiculous ruling. Not because of the outcome but the fact that she never even had gay client to ask her to create a website. This was no Masterpiece Bakery issue
She manufacturered a lawsuit out of thin air and the Supreme Court should have tossed it for having no standing. She is going to get her ass beaten for pulling this stunt
What if I told you the Supreme Court is purposely making these decisions in an attempt to delegitimize the court so their power can be usurped in the name of “protecting our democracy?”
I think it was a ridiculous ruling. Not because of the outcome but the fact that she never even had gay client to ask her to create a website. This was no Masterpiece Bakery issue
She manufacturered a lawsuit out of thin air and the Supreme Court should have tossed it for having no standing. She is going to get her ass beaten for pulling this stunt
Dr. Goodrum, PHD, CSN, MFT, HPP, CEO, you do not think there will be any more legal proceedings on this matter?
I never understood the basic argument to begin with:
-You offer a service that you charge money for.
-I want to use your service and therefore pay you money.
-You tell me you do not want to serve me because I'm X, Y or Z.
-Now I think my reaction would be 'fuck off' Ill take my hard earned cash elsewhere asshole.
-But these people want to make / force someone to provide a service AND then PAY that person money for that service?
It's like the lesbian couple who sued a bakery to bake them a cake for their wedding and won (im sure it's overturned now) but now, on what should be the happiest day of your life, you're eating a cake made by someone who despises your verry existence. It's just more Dem perversion.
Why the fuck on earth would you wNt to reward someone who despises you? Weird.
Vince, are you homosexual? I ask because it seems you and a few others here are routinely running interference for them.
I think Vince is mostly homosexual. He is still straight enough to give out marriage advice and to teach others the proper way to perform cunnilingus.:D He is an expert on a lot of things.