Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Agnostic007 on July 14, 2023, 09:55:14 PM
-
$8000 bet to Coach to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.
-
Here comes “all the evidence” - which is always no evidence being posted and just the usual “oh boy”, “the courts wouldn’t look at it”, and other excuses.
Excuses. Not evidence. The greatest political crime in modern history and no actual evidence. Plus the opposing party actually helped perpetuate it and cover it up. ::)
-
Here comes “all the evidence” - which is always no evidence being posted and just the usual “oh boy”, “the courts wouldn’t look at it”, and other excuses.
Excuses. Not evidence. The greatest political crime in modern history and no actual evidence. Plus the opposing party actually helped perpetuate it and cover it up. ::)
Will the Pillow Guy be quoted?
Gulliani?
The Kraken?
I'm dying to find out
-
$8000 bet to Coach to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.
I already have little man. Many times. Like lurker, you wouldn’t not only read it, if you did, you couldn’t refute it. Tell you what hot shot, I’ll extend the same thing I’ve said for along time on here that he keeps running from.
Let’s all of us have a live debate on here you, me, lurker, Prime and Straw. You seem to think just because this fucking communist is sitting in the chain that he won legitimately won. Are you in?
And oh, you do realize this is still being investigated, right? Of course you don’t
-
I already have little man. Many times. Like lurker, you wouldn’t not only read it, if you did, you couldn’t refute it. Tell you what hot shot, I’ll extend the same thing I’ve said for along time on here that he keeps running from.
Let’s all of us have a live debate on here you, me, lurker, Prime and Straw. You seem to think just because this fucking communist is sitting in the chain that he won legitimately won. Are you in?
And oh, you do realize this is still being investigated, right? Of course you don’t
Sad. Just sad...
-
$8000 bet to Coach to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.
This is funny. Like Coach has the evidence sitting around in his closet. ::)
Like I said in the other thread, you're convinced russia ran some ads on the internet and convinced millions to vote for Trump, but our own government didn't involve themselves at all in 2020 and made sure that election was legit despite there being odd vote counts and the possibility of voting machines being manipulated.
Someone else asked around here of you, so I'll ask here...do you believe the government and it's alphabet organizations have the best interest of the American people in mind?
-
This is funny. Like Coach has the evidence sitting around in his closet. ::)
Like I said in the other thread, you're convinced russia ran some ads on the internet and convinced millions to vote for Trump, but our own government didn't involve themselves at all in 2020 and made sure that election was legit despite there being odd vote counts and the possibility of voting machines being manipulated.
Someone else asked around here of you, so I'll ask here...do you believe the government and it's alphabet organizations have the best interest of the American people in mind?
Me, I asked & awaiting a response.......... It's a simple yes / no answer
Honestly I'd be shocked & surprised if he says yes - maybe he should ref to my conspiracy
theory thread.
-
Sad. Just sad...
But oh so predictable.
-
Me, I asked & awaiting a response.......... It's a simple yes / no answer
Honestly I'd be shocked & surprised if he says yes - maybe he should ref to my conspiracy
theory thread.
I would not be shocked at all if he thought the alphabet agencies have the American peoples best interest in mind. He's repeatedly shown he's a big government boot licker. Democrats can do no wrong in his eyes, not matter how blatantly obvious the crime or immoral event is.
-
I would not be shocked at all if he thought the alphabet agencies have the American peoples best interest in mind. He's repeatedly shown he's a big government boot licker. Democrats can do no wrong in his eyes, not matter how blatantly obvious the crime or immoral event is.
he is just another low IQ muppet that believes CNN etc when it suits him.
-
I would not be shocked at all if he thought the alphabet agencies have the American peoples best interest in mind. He's repeatedly shown he's a big government boot licker. Democrats can do no wrong in his eyes, not matter how blatantly obvious the crime or immoral event is.
I'm sure Ag 007 will reply - and maybe shock us with his answer .
-
$8000 bet to Coach to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.
I would say not stolen in the traditional sense of hacking machines to get fake votes, but absolutely in the sense of big tech and media manipulation. Shit, even some people like Sam Harris flat out admit it, yet justify it as part of their bastardized take on the "greater good".
The censorship of the Biden laptop story is undeniable at this point, as is the lying and manipulation of experts to produce a false narrative, all constructed by members of Biden's campaign, with gov't agency support.
You can find polling examples that show %s of voters who would have changed their vote, and the math states it changed the results of the election, mostly due to the small margin of EC victory in 3 swing states.
But also, the stuff I mentioned in the first sentence will never be proven or disproven, because courts never gave them a chance. There is zero doubt there was some kind of fraud, just on the fact that there has to be in an election of this size, but I don't know if there's any material impact, so I don't dwell on it.
-
I would say not stolen in the traditional sense of hacking machines to get fake votes, but absolutely in the sense of big tech and media manipulation. Shit, even some people like Sam Harris flat out admit it, yet justify it as part of their bastardized take on the "greater good".
The censorship of the Biden laptop story is undeniable at this point, as is the lying and manipulation of experts to produce a false narrative, all constructed by members of Biden's campaign, with gov't agency support.
You can find polling examples that show %s of voters who would have changed their vote, and the math states it changed the results of the election, mostly due to the small margin of EC victory in 3 swing states.
But also, the stuff I mentioned in the first sentence will never be proven or disproven, because courts never gave them a chance. There is zero doubt there was some kind of fraud, just on the fact that there has to be in an election of this size, but I don't know if there's any material impact, so I don't dwell on it.
This x2
Some very dodgy things went on to thwart Donald
-
Getbiggers don't generally post the actual contents of their bank accounts. ;D
-
This is funny. Like Coach has the evidence sitting around in his closet. ::)
Like I said in the other thread, you're convinced russia ran some ads on the internet and convinced millions to vote for Trump, but our own government didn't involve themselves at all in 2020 and made sure that election was legit despite there being odd vote counts and the possibility of voting machines being manipulated.
Someone else asked around here of you, so I'll ask here...do you believe the government and it's alphabet organizations have the best interest of the American people in mind?
No of course not for the most part. But it's complicated. When it comes to getting re-elected, I believe politicians have their own best interest at heart. This means during election years, both parties will put forth legislation that is often meaningless because laws already exist that address the concerns. But they (either party) will add a little something so that when the other party votes it down they can then go to the press and say _____party votes down child endangerment law. Very few people will look into why.. what was tied to the bill that made them do that. They will just say _________ hates children.. vets... elderly.
Now moving on from politicians, who for the most part, are hired assassins,. we have other departments. Some people confuse the FBI, the DOJ and similar departments as political. The truth is, most workers are life long workers, having served in both demoratic and republican whitehouses. I find it a bit unfair when people claim X is being political, even if X was appointed by a President from that party.. You likely know some recent examples. It's too easy to say "we can't trust ___ because they are against our man.. when "our man" appointed the head.. It's lacking reasonableness.
-
$8000 bet to Coach to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.
Debunk this…this first page alone should have ended it.
-
Debunking an op-ed? ::)
-
$8000 bet to Coach to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the election was stolen.
It was stolen - not by vote machines changing ballots but by massive collusion by Big Tech censoring the news, the 3 letter agencies colluding to suppress information, by framing people, etc.
-
It was stolen - not by vote machines changing ballots but by massive collusion by Big Tech censoring the news, the 3 letter agencies colluding to suppress information, by framing people, etc.
Stop. After Obama you seemed to be leveling off with the craziness. Now you going right back down the slope again. Did your divorce affect you that bad?
-
Stop. After Obama you seemed to be leveling off with the craziness. Now you going right back down the slope again. Did your divorce affect you that bad?
WTFNG hell is wrong with you - its been all over the news about the surpression of the Hunter Biden Laptop that the FBI and Big Tech did that. Zuckerberg confirmed that FB was approached by the FBI. Then the CIA and intell people concocted that fake letter Biden trouted out at the debate.
-
Debunking an op-ed? ::)
Not an op-ed, dippy
-
I would say not stolen in the traditional sense of hacking machines to get fake votes, but absolutely in the sense of big tech and media manipulation. Shit, even some people like Sam Harris flat out admit it, yet justify it as part of their bastardized take on the "greater good".
The censorship of the Biden laptop story is undeniable at this point, as is the lying and manipulation of experts to produce a false narrative, all constructed by members of Biden's campaign, with gov't agency support.
You can find polling examples that show %s of voters who would have changed their vote, and the math states it changed the results of the election, mostly due to the small margin of EC victory in 3 swing states.
But also, the stuff I mentioned in the first sentence will never be proven or disproven, because courts never gave them a chance. There is zero doubt there was some kind of fraud, just on the fact that there has to be in an election of this size, but I don't know if there's any material impact, so I don't dwell on it.
Spot on.
-
Stop. After Obama you seemed to be leveling off with the craziness. Now you going right back down the slope again. Did your divorce affect you that bad?
Mentioning his divorce? Really? Why the heck are you trying to use his personal information to attack him? No class.
-
Debunk this…this first page alone should have ended it.
Not much to debunk. It seems written sometime close to the election because it refers to the 50 lawsuits filed by Trump and the Republicans as "backing up the claims". But we know now for a fact none. not a single one of those lawsuits were successful and the other evidence it also mentions were debunked between when that "letter" was written and now.
-
No of course not for the most part. But it's complicated. When it comes to getting re-elected, I believe politicians have their own best interest at heart. This means during election years, both parties will put forth legislation that is often meaningless because laws already exist that address the concerns. But they (either party) will add a little something so that when the other party votes it down they can then go to the press and say _____party votes down child endangerment law. Very few people will look into why.. what was tied to the bill that made them do that. They will just say _________ hates children.. vets... elderly.
Now moving on from politicians, who for the most part, are hired assassins,. we have other departments. Some people confuse the FBI, the DOJ and similar departments as political. The truth is, most workers are life long workers, having served in both demoratic and republican whitehouses. I find it a bit unfair when people claim X is being political, even if X was appointed by a President from that party.. You likely know some recent examples. It's too easy to say "we can't trust ___ because they are against our man.. when "our man" appointed the head.. It's lacking reasonableness.
Really doesn't matter who appointed who to what alphabet agency, they will do as they're told by those in charge and those guys take orders from above them.
I think you've been asked a few times, I don't believe I've seen an answer, do you believe the government and the alphabet agencies has the best interest of the American people in mind?
-
Mentioning his divorce? Really? Why the heck are you trying to use his personal information to attack him? No class.
His divorce from Obama. ::)
Now thanks to you, we all know he has a divorce in real life.
-
I would say not stolen in the traditional sense of hacking machines to get fake votes, but absolutely in the sense of big tech and media manipulation. Shit, even some people like Sam Harris flat out admit it, yet justify it as part of their bastardized take on the "greater good".
The censorship of the Biden laptop story is undeniable at this point, as is the lying and manipulation of experts to produce a false narrative, all constructed by members of Biden's campaign, with gov't agency support.
You can find polling examples that show %s of voters who would have changed their vote, and the math states it changed the results of the election, mostly due to the small margin of EC victory in 3 swing states.
But also, the stuff I mentioned in the first sentence will never be proven or disproven, because courts never gave them a chance. There is zero doubt there was some kind of fraud, just on the fact that there has to be in an election of this size, but I don't know if there's any material impact, so I don't dwell on it.
How many voters would have changed their votes knowing Trumpy was not so much pro-marriage or such a Christian for having an affair and paying to cover it up (suppression)? Woulda, coulda, shoulda,..... but for naught.
-
How many voters would have changed their votes knowing Trumpy was not so much pro-marriage or such a Christian for having an affair and paying to cover it up (suppression)? Woulda, coulda, shoulda,..... but for naught.
Less than would have changed their vote if they knew the Hunter Biden laptop story was true and not buried by the government and media shills. ;)
-
Less than would have changed their vote if they knew the Hunter Biden laptop story was true and not buried by the government and media shills. ;)
Woulda, coulda, shoulda, but for naught.
-
Not much to debunk. It seems written sometime close to the election because it refers to the 50 lawsuits filed by Trump and the Republicans as "backing up the claims". But we know now for a fact none. not a single one of those lawsuits were successful and the other evidence it also mentions were debunked between when that "letter" was written and now.
This why I question what you did for a living. You’re not that bright and can’t actually look into the facts of a case.lMuch like the “50” lawsuits that were filed (that weren’t all by Trump attorneys) that none of those judges would even bother too look at the evidence let along enter it and I’m not to explain it yet AGAIN as to they dismissed it. But you go with yourself and keep repeating and telling that lie that the MSM repeats that you and your fellow retards buy into
Now fucking debunk it. You wanted evidence, there it is not to mention FB, Twitter and the rest of the MSM suppressing the Hunter laptop that even Zuckerberg said that if it wasn’t it would have changed the outcome of the elections. Even polls suggested that 70% said if they would have know they wouldn’t have voted for him.
Election interference, son. Just like right now with what’s happening to Trump
-
His divorce from Obama. ::)
Now thanks to you, we all know he has a divorce in real life.
I have no idea if he is divorced in real life. And don't act like you aren't constantly trying to use people's personal information to trash them. Like a child.
-
Woulda, coulda, shoulda, but for naught.
Of course, your side profited from the corruption, it's no surprise a scumbag like you doesn't have an issue with this.
-
I have no idea if he is divorced in real life. And don't act like you aren't constantly trying to use people's personal information to trash them. Like a child.
::)
White Knight attempted failed.
-
This why I question what you did for a living. You’re not that bright and can’t actually look into the facts of a case.lMuch like the “50” lawsuits that were filed (that weren’t all by Trump attorneys) that none of those judges would even bother too look at the evidence let along enter it and I’m not to explain it yet AGAIN as to they dismissed it. But you go with yourself and keep repeating and telling that lie that the MSM repeats that you and your fellow retards buy into
Now fucking debunk it. You wanted evidence, there it is not to mention FB, Twitter and the rest of the MSM suppressing the Hunter laptop that even Zuckerberg said that if it wasn’t it would have changed the outcome of the elections. Even polls suggested that 70% said if they would have know they wouldn’t have voted for him.
Election interference, son. Just like right now with what’s happening to Trump
You mean like the fake electors? The bribery/extortion phone calls? The attempts to have the AG get involved or the VP say the loser actually won?
-
You mean like the fake electors? The bribery/extortion phone calls? The attempts to have the AG get involved or the VP say the loser actually won?
You have no idea what election interference is, do you?
-
Of course, your side profited from the corruption, it's no surprise a scumbag like you doesn't have an issue with this.
Interesting that most of the recounts/audits/etc have only seen Biden's number of votes grow.
Corruption? You mean the side with all the investigations and federal indictments?
-
You have no idea what election interference is, do you?
I just posted examples dumb ass. You don't know what reality is do you?
-
Interesting that most of the recounts/audits/etc have only seen Biden's number of votes grow.
And of course, you find nothing odd about that at all, right Tom?
-
I just posted examples dumb ass. You don't know what reality is do you?
Not in this thread you didn’t
-
And of course, you find nothing odd about that at all, right Tom?
Not at all Fetter.
What I do find odd is the total crickets on the real election interference I listed above. No one wants to talk about those fake electors trying to steal the election. Or the little find me some votes phone call. Or the begging of the VP to ignore his duties. Etc...
Or don't you find that odd? Don't worry. It will all come out in court very soon. ;D Good times!
-
Not in this thread you didn’t
Not only did I do it, but you quoted it.
Retardation really is God's gift for helping the little ones cope with reality.
-
Not only did I do it, but you quoted it.
Retardation really is God's gift for helping the little ones cope with reality.
Yeah…none of that happed. That why I said what I said.
-
Not only did I do it, but you quoted it.
Retardation really is God's gift for helping the little ones cope with reality.
This is real election interference…
https://www.westernjournal.com/can-read-twitter-files-right/
-
Yeah…none of that happed. That why I said what I said.
Don't worry, I am sure the courts will drop their upcoming cases and indictments against the Trumpturds. Since it didn't happen. ::)
-
This why I question what you did for a living. You’re not that bright and can’t actually look into the facts of a case.lMuch like the “50” lawsuits that were filed (that weren’t all by Trump attorneys) that none of those judges would even bother too look at the evidence let along enter it and I’m not to explain it yet AGAIN as to they dismissed it. But you go with yourself and keep repeating and telling that lie that the MSM repeats that you and your fellow retards buy into
Now fucking debunk it. You wanted evidence, there it is not to mention FB, Twitter and the rest of the MSM suppressing the Hunter laptop that even Zuckerberg said that if it wasn’t it would have changed the outcome of the elections. Even polls suggested that 70% said if they would have know they wouldn’t have voted for him.
Election interference, son. Just like right now with what’s happening to Trump
I think you question what I did for a living because you have trouble comprehending facts, evidence, procedures etc and because my conclusions, which concur with the conclusions of the courts, Republican election officials, State Supreme Courts, Attorney General and Vice President don't match your conclusions, based on Pillow guy, Gulliani, the Kracken, you feel you need to strike out like it will bolster your weak arguments. For example;
"none of those judges would even bother..." STFU..
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/28/instagram-posts/trump-campaigns-evidence-of-fraud-was-reviewed-bef/
"In Nevada, Trump supporters sued to challenge the state’s election results and seeking an order from the court declaring Trump the winner or declaring Biden’s victory "null and void."
Dismissing the lawsuit on Dec. 4, 2020, District Court James T. Russell wrote that the people behind it failed "to provide credible and relevant evidence" to contest the Nov. 3, 2020 election in accordance with Nevada laws.
Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote."
and...
"On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
Now don't you feel stupid? You ought to... a not so bright Detective just spanked you
-
Let’s all of us have a live debate on here you, me, lurker, Prime and Straw. You seem to think just because this fucking communist is sitting in the chain that he won legitimately won. Are you in?
I don’t know if it’s possible to have a debate with you. I’m sure you’re considered smart on your home planet, but the fact is that what passes for smart on DUMBONIUM IV is intellectually equivalent to a pet rock.
-
Debunk this…this first page alone should have ended it.
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55016029
"There've been other claims from the Republicans about sudden spikes in votes favouring the Democrats in key battleground states - such as Michigan and Wisconsin - implying fraud could be involved.
These spikes can be easily accounted for in the timing of the release of large batches of results for big cities like Milwaukee and Detroit, which are always skewed heavily Democratic.
In some cases, there have been clerical errors or software glitches, which have been corrected after being discovered.
It's also worth noting that the record numbers of postal ballots in this election have overwhelmingly favoured the Democratic party, particularly in urban areas.
In some states (including Michigan and Wisconsin) counting of these postal votes only started once the polls had closed on 3 November. They take longer to count, so you would have expected to see a bump in the Biden vote each time batches of these results were released."
and...
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/donald-trump/no-president-trump-ballot-dumps-key-states-were-no/
"The "ballot dumps" were not a surprise. Officials have warned for months that one of the consequences of the flood of mail ballots — a byproduct of the pandemic — is that they take longer to count.
Many Democrats chose to vote by mail or through drop boxes, while many of Trump’s supporters decided to vote at the polls on Election Day since Trump had been critical of mail ballots. Different states and even counties within a state have different rules for what ballots were tabulated first. This meant that when jurisdictions released their most recent ballot counts on Election Night, how the ballot was cast became highly correlated with the likelihood of that batch of ballots being strong for either Biden or Trump.
By the wee hours of the morning after the election, significant numbers of ballots remained to be counted in the Democratic strongholds of Pennsylvania such as Philadelphia, the Philadelphia suburbs and Pittsburgh. Similarly, in Wisconsin and Michigan, the Democratic areas of Milwaukee and Detroit had significant numbers of ballots that remained to be counted. Trump’s lead in Georgia — like the three others, a state Trump won in 2016 — had also narrowed, with Biden making gains in and around Atlanta.
Because of these factors, lead-switching between the candidates was not a sign of something amiss. It was just a sign of the process unfolding and all ballots cast being counted. "
Would you like my paypal info?
-
I don’t know if it’s possible to have a debate with you. I’m sure you’re considered smart on your home planet, but the fact is that what passes for smart on DUMBONIUM IV is intellectually equivalent to a pet rock.
He has been told over and over why no one will debate him. Yet he either doesn't understand English or is too stupid to realize he is stupid.
-
I think you question what I did for a living because you have trouble comprehending facts, evidence, procedures etc and because my conclusions, which concur with the conclusions of the courts, Republican election officials, State Supreme Courts, Attorney General and Vice President don't match your conclusions, based on Pillow guy, Gulliani, the Kracken, you feel you need to strike out like it will bolster your weak arguments. For example;
"none of those judges would even bother..." STFU..
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/28/instagram-posts/trump-campaigns-evidence-of-fraud-was-reviewed-bef/
"In Nevada, Trump supporters sued to challenge the state’s election results and seeking an order from the court declaring Trump the winner or declaring Biden’s victory "null and void."
Dismissing the lawsuit on Dec. 4, 2020, District Court James T. Russell wrote that the people behind it failed "to provide credible and relevant evidence" to contest the Nov. 3, 2020 election in accordance with Nevada laws.
Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote."
and...
"On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
Now don't you feel stupid? You ought to... a not so bright Detective just spanked you
It's really interesting (haha) how the courts review the case enough to realize that the evidence was no evidence at all. And thus, rejected it over and over. :D Yet the only excuse that Trumpturds can make is "they wouldn't look at the evidence." Oh, they looked. That's how they knew it was bullshit or not there all together.
-
It's really interesting (haha) how the courts review the case enough to realize that the evidence was no evidence at all. And thus, rejected it over and over. :D Yet the only excuse that Trumpturds can make is "they wouldn't look at the evidence." Oh, they looked. That's how they knew it was bullshit or not there all together.
low IQ copy and past by Pedro Pete
-
I don’t know if it’s possible to have a debate with you. I’m sure you’re considered smart on your home planet, but the fact is that what passes for smart on DUMBONIUM IV is intellectually equivalent to a pet rock.
You can do better than this.
-
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55016029
"There've been other claims from the Republicans about sudden spikes in votes favouring the Democrats in key battleground states - such as Michigan and Wisconsin - implying fraud could be involved.
These spikes can be easily accounted for in the timing of the release of large batches of results for big cities like Milwaukee and Detroit, which are always skewed heavily Democratic.
In some cases, there have been clerical errors or software glitches, which have been corrected after being discovered.
It's also worth noting that the record numbers of postal ballots in this election have overwhelmingly favoured the Democratic party, particularly in urban areas.
In some states (including Michigan and Wisconsin) counting of these postal votes only started once the polls had closed on 3 November. They take longer to count, so you would have expected to see a bump in the Biden vote each time batches of these results were released."
and...
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/donald-trump/no-president-trump-ballot-dumps-key-states-were-no/
"The "ballot dumps" were not a surprise. Officials have warned for months that one of the consequences of the flood of mail ballots — a byproduct of the pandemic — is that they take longer to count.
Many Democrats chose to vote by mail or through drop boxes, while many of Trump’s supporters decided to vote at the polls on Election Day since Trump had been critical of mail ballots. Different states and even counties within a state have different rules for what ballots were tabulated first. This meant that when jurisdictions released their most recent ballot counts on Election Night, how the ballot was cast became highly correlated with the likelihood of that batch of ballots being strong for either Biden or Trump.
By the wee hours of the morning after the election, significant numbers of ballots remained to be counted in the Democratic strongholds of Pennsylvania such as Philadelphia, the Philadelphia suburbs and Pittsburgh. Similarly, in Wisconsin and Michigan, the Democratic areas of Milwaukee and Detroit had significant numbers of ballots that remained to be counted. Trump’s lead in Georgia — like the three others, a state Trump won in 2016 — had also narrowed, with Biden making gains in and around Atlanta.
Because of these factors, lead-switching between the candidates was not a sign of something amiss. It was just a sign of the process unfolding and all ballots cast being counted. "
Would you like my paypal info?
This doesn’t say really anything. Maybe you’d like to go over that first graphic again…unless you didn’t understand it when you read it..if you read it
-
I think you question what I did for a living because you have trouble comprehending facts, evidence, procedures etc and because my conclusions, which concur with the conclusions of the courts, Republican election officials, State Supreme Courts, Attorney General and Vice President don't match your conclusions, based on Pillow guy, Gulliani, the Kracken, you feel you need to strike out like it will bolster your weak arguments. For example;
"none of those judges would even bother..." STFU..
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/28/instagram-posts/trump-campaigns-evidence-of-fraud-was-reviewed-bef/
"In Nevada, Trump supporters sued to challenge the state’s election results and seeking an order from the court declaring Trump the winner or declaring Biden’s victory "null and void."
Dismissing the lawsuit on Dec. 4, 2020, District Court James T. Russell wrote that the people behind it failed "to provide credible and relevant evidence" to contest the Nov. 3, 2020 election in accordance with Nevada laws.
Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote."
and...
"On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
Now don't you feel stupid? You ought to... a not so bright Detective just spanked you
and right after I told you that no courts even bothered to even look at the evidence let alone enter it….you post this. Unbelievable
-
and right after I told you that no courts even bothered to even look at the evidence let alone enter it….you post this. Unbelievable
Ok, this confirms you’re not playing with a full deck. This would also explain to a person of normal intelligence why no one bothers to debate him. It’s pointless. You won’t understand what’s said and you’ll claim victory regardless because in you mind if you respond with words, no matter what they are, you think that means you won. Frankly I’m done wasting my time trying to show you how stupid your stolen election position is. Might as well be talking to Ben Stillers character in Tropic Thunder Simple Jack .. good thing there are Coaching jobs for them.
-
You can do better than this.
I can, but is there really a point? Putting any more than minimal effort in responding would be like having Yo-Yo Ma play a concerto for deaf children.
Also, hi! It’s been a while. I hope you’ve been well, despite your continuing addiction to “The Donald”.
-
Ok, this confirms you’re not playing with a full deck. This would also explain to a person of normal intelligence why no one bothers to debate him. It’s pointless. You won’t understand what’s said and you’ll claim victory regardless because in you mind if you respond with words, no matter what they are, you think that means you won. Frankly I’m done wasting my time trying to show you how stupid your stolen election position is. Might as well be talking to Ben Stillers character in Tropic Thunder Simple Jack .. good thing there are Coaching jobs for them.
Skating
-
Skating
Good job coach! You used a word. Spelled it correctly too. You get a gold star! Keep up the good work
-
and right after I told you that no courts even bothered to even look at the evidence let alone enter it….you post this. Unbelievable
And you post this after being told over and over and having the courts own words listed on the computer screen as to why they didn't waste their time looking at it.
It's BULLSHIT. Just like your excuses.
-
Good job coach! You used a word. Spelled it correctly too. You get a gold star! Keep up the good work
It also helps if you were actually in the room when many of these questions were asked, like I was.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/rand-paul-courts-have-not-decided-election-results-found-excuses-to-sit-out
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/supreme-courts-decision-not-hear-elections-cases-could-have-serious
Btw, dippy #2. 90% of the time I’m using voice to text. Let me know when you’re perfect because seriously, that literally all you can come up with
-
I can, but is there really a point? Putting any more than minimal effort in responding would be like having Yo-Yo Ma play a concerto for deaf children.
Also, hi! It’s been a while. I hope you’ve been well, despite your continuing addiction to “The Donald”.
Thanks, hope you’re doing well. How’s the back?
-
And you post this after being told over and over and having the courts own words listed on the computer screen as to why they didn't waste their time looking at it.
It's BULLSHIT. Just like your excuses.
Save it coach.. I gave you two solid examples of courts looking at it and you ignored them. The fact is, you wouldn’t be an election denier if you had the mental capacity to comprehend what I posted which is why I’m washing my hands of this pointless “debate”. At this point it’s like debating flat earth.. I’m not going to change your mind.
-
Thanks, hope you’re doing well. How’s the back?
Good days and bad. More good these days, which is a bit surprising given how aging works. Working out certainly helps!
-
Ok, this confirms you’re not playing with a full deck. This would also explain to a person of normal intelligence why no one bothers to debate him. It’s pointless. You won’t understand what’s said and you’ll claim victory regardless because in you mind if you respond with words, no matter what they are, you think that means you won. Frankly I’m done wasting my time trying to show you how stupid your stolen election position is. Might as well be talking to Ben Stillers character in Tropic Thunder Simple Jack .. good thing there are Coaching jobs for them.
Once you devolve to insults, you've lost the exchange.
-
Save it coach.. I gave you two solid examples of courts looking at it and you ignored them. The fact is, you wouldn’t be an election denier if you had the mental capacity to comprehend what I posted which is why I’m washing my hands of this pointless “debate”. At this point it’s like debating flat earth.. I’m not going to change your mind.
What !!!
The earth is flat ,
Father Christmas is real
& so is Wrestling
Hunter loves his daughter
Only not quite as much as Cocaine
And Pedo Pete has No interest in young girls !!!!
😁🤣
-
Once you devolve to insults, you've lost the exchange.
Well you'll have to go back a few posts
-
Once you devolve to insults, you've lost the exchange.
What if it is not an insult, but a description?
-
This why I question what you did for a living. You’re not that bright and can’t actually look into the facts of a case.lMuch like the “50” lawsuits that were filed (that weren’t all by Trump attorneys) that none of those judges would even bother too look at the evidence let along enter it and I’m not to explain it yet AGAIN as to they dismissed it. But you go with yourself and keep repeating and telling that lie that the MSM repeats that you and your fellow retards buy into
Now fucking debunk it. You wanted evidence, there it is not to mention FB, Twitter and the rest of the MSM suppressing the Hunter laptop that even Zuckerberg said that if it wasn’t it would have changed the outcome of the elections. Even polls suggested that 70% said if they would have know they wouldn’t have voted for him.
Election interference, son. Just like right now with what’s happening to Trump
Grape Ape, did he lose the exchange here?
-
As in "cocaine exchange"???
-
As in "cocaine exchange"???
We all know it was Hunter's coke and covered up by the deepstate.
-
Grape Ape, did he lose the exchange here?
I'm not a fan of that either, at least on the poli threads.
This is a small subform of a small forum, with a few obvious trolls, but most are of reasonable intelligence.
I just think we can do better here.
If not, fine, I don't really care THAT much.
-
We all know it was Hunter's coke and covered up by the deepstate.
Highly likely it was someone who if named would've really hurt the Biden bandwagon
in general populations opinion.
Extremely odd no finger print matches found ::)
No CCTV
No eye witness's
Nada / zero / nothing.
-
I'm not a fan of that either, at least on the poli threads.
This is a small subform of a small forum, with a few obvious trolls, but most are of reasonable intelligence.
I just think we can do better here.
If not, fine, I don't really care THAT much.
I would like that.
-
The FBI can ID you at protest in another country
With facial recognition
But can't catch a person stashing coke at the
White House with over 700 cameras
Yeah right & many are believing that crap.
-
The FBI can ID you at protest in another country
With facial recognition
But can't catch a person stashing coke at the
White House with over 700 cameras
Yeah right & many are believing that crap.
If Trump was in office the media wouldn't stop playing this on rotation until someone was in custody.
-
If Trump was in office the media wouldn't stop playing this on rotation until someone was in custody.
If Trump were in office this wouldn't make the news... There would be far worse scandals to focus on than who left a dime bag in an area with public access. We should be grateful this is all they have to focus on.
-
If Trump were in office this wouldn't make the news... There would be far worse scandals to focus on than who left a dime bag in an area with public access. We should be grateful this is all they have to focus on.
::) You know this is wrong, you're just playing the partisan role.
-
If Trump were in office this wouldn't make the news... There would be far worse scandals to focus on than who left a dime bag in an area with public access. We should be grateful this is all they have to focus on.
You like hearsay manufactured ones of the last 7+ years that were created by the left with the MSM’s help?
-
You like hearsay manufactured ones of the last 7+ years that were created by the left with the MSM’s help?
Or how about the ones you manufacture on a daily basis? Still no link to that debunking like you claim? It's ok. We know you lied for no reason. "Dishonest".
-
You like hearsay manufactured ones of the last 7+ years that were created by the left with the MSM’s help?
You mean the ones he was impeached on a couple times and at last count, indicted on a couple times? Those hearsay rumors?
-
You mean the ones he was impeached on a couple times and at last count, indicted on a couple times? Those hearsay rumors?
This orange buffoon is about to set a record for being indicted 4 times in six months for dozens and dozens of felonies and the only excuse the wacko supporters can come up with is "hearsay", or "fake", or "debunked".
-
This orange buffoon is about to set a record for being indicted 4 times in six months for dozens and dozens of felonies and the only excuse the wacko supporters can come up with is "hearsay", or "fake", or "debunked".
Don't forget "Far Left witch hunting".. I'll bet Jeffery Dahlmers lawyer is sitting back saying "Damn! Why didn't we think of that?"
-
Don't forget "Far Left witch hunting".. I'll bet Jeffery Dahlmers lawyer is sitting back saying "Damn! Why didn't we think of that?"
You are the Shizzo of the political board. LOL
-
You are the Shizzo of the political board. LOL
Nicest thing I've heard all day
-
Don't forget "Far Left witch hunting".. I'll bet Jeffery Dahlmers lawyer is sitting back saying "Damn! Why didn't we think of that?"
So out of all of the presidents you believe that Trump is the only president that supposedly may have done some shady shit?
Do you really don't think this is a political attack to stop the momentum of the democrats #1 opponent?
Do you really believe that these investigations have been legitimate?
Do you really think that the media has told you the 100% truth about this situation with Trump?
-
A political attack by who? Not by Biden. Not by Congress. Not by anyone running for office. Who is the plaintiff again?
Of course these investigations have been legitimate. So are the charges and indictments resulting from them.
Media > you when it comes to be factual.
All the little Trumpturds want to blame someone else for little Trumpy's problems and misfortunes. Why not blame the person actually responsible for them? DJT? Bottom line is if he hadn't done that shit, he wouldn't be in this spot.
-
A political attack by who? Not by Biden. Not by Congress. Not by anyone running for office. Who is the plaintiff again?
Of course these investigations have been legitimate. So are the charges and indictments resulting from them.
Media > you when it comes to be factual.
All the little Trumpturds want to blame someone else for little Trumpy's problems and misfortunes. Why not blame the person actually responsible for them? DJT? Bottom line is if he hadn't done that shit, he wouldn't be in this spot.
If I wanted the opinion of a fucking idiot, I would have directed the questions towards you. :)
-
If I wanted the opinion of a fucking idiot, I would have directed the questions towards you. :)
Nothing to refute my reply with I see. Not surprising. That extra cranium space sure wasn't filled with any extra "brainium" apparently.
How awful it must be to encounter reality so early in the morning.
-
Ha Ha Ha
Pedo Pete having the piss taken out of him
What a Great President & leader ;D :D ;D ;D :D
Let's see all The DummyCraps come running to defend him ::)
-
The Hell's Angel wannabe just can't stop thinking about a political system he will never be able to enjoy or vote in.
-
Nothing to refute my reply with I see. Not surprising. That extra cranium space sure wasn't filled with any extra "brainium" apparently.
How awful it must be to encounter reality so early in the morning.
Your reply is about as useful as Kuntmala.
-
Your reply is about as useful as Kuntmala.
"I love the poorly educated." - DJT
Trumpy probably loves you the most.
-
You mean the ones he was impeached on a couple times and at last count, indicted on a couple times? Those hearsay rumors?
The first impeachment was a complete partisan joke, and will pave the way for the same thing to happen to the Democrats and the future.
-
So out of all of the presidents you believe that Trump is the only president that supposedly may have done some shady shit?
Do you really don't think this is a political attack to stop the momentum of the democrats #1 opponent?
Do you really believe that these investigations have been legitimate?
Do you really think that the media as told you the 100% truth about this situation with Trump?
I'll respond because you may be the last of the Trumpsters that might listen.
Nixon did some shady shit.
Clinton did some shady shit
Bush Jr invading Iraq may have done some shady shit
But none of them.. none.. has reached the level of Trump. Review the Mueller report or actually read it for the 1st time. Read the chronological timeline that lead to the 36 or 37 counts in his indictment.
No other president has denigrated POW's like Trump. None have been found guilty of what he found guilty of against women. None have ADMITTED to grabbing women because he has celebrity status.
No other president is on record trying to get a foreign power to investigate their opponents (Ukraine) to affect an election
No President has attempted to overturn an election by applying pressure to election officials like he has.
No President has instigated a riot by his words has Trump has.
The investigations have checks and balances. The fact is, he DID what he is being accused of. You, as an Amirican citizen should be happy he is being held accountable. This time it is a president you like, what about next time?
-
You mean the ones he was impeached on a couple times and at last count, indicted on a couple times? Those hearsay rumors?
Yes, that would be same impeachments where the prosecution got lit up or did you not read about that?
-
I'll respond because you may be the last of the Trumpsters that might listen.
Nixon did some shady shit.
Clinton did some shady shit
Bush Jr invading Iraq may have done some shady shit
But none of them.. none.. has reached the level of Trump. Review the Mueller report or actually read it for the 1st time. Read the chronological timeline that lead to the 36 or 37 counts in his indictment.
No other president has denigrated POW's like Trump. None have been found guilty of what he found guilty of against women. None have ADMITTED to grabbing women because he has celebrity status.
No other president is on record trying to get a foreign power to investigate their opponents (Ukraine) to affect an election
No President has attempted to overturn an election by applying pressure to election officials like he has.
No President has instigated a riot by his words has Trump has.
The investigations have checks and balances. The fact is, he DID what he is being accused of. You, as an Amirican citizen should be happy he is being held accountable. This time it is a president you like, what about next time?
Do you know anything about Presidents? The affairs, the corruption, the fist fighting, the drunken racist outbursts?
Are you saying Bill Clinton never admitted to banging that chick with a cigar? Our current President didn't threaten to withhold billions of dollars in aid to get a prosecutor investigating a company his son was involved in fired? As an American citizen, I want equal prosecution for crimes at all levels, that means democrats and republicans, not just Trump.
-
Do you know anything about Presidents? The affairs, the corruption, the fist fighting, the drunken racist outbursts?
Are you saying Bill Clinton never admitted to banging that chick with a cigar? Our current President didn't threaten to withhold billions of dollars in aid to get a prosecutor investigating a company his son was involved in fired? As an American citizen, I want equal prosecution for crimes at all levels, that means democrats and republicans, not just Trump.
Dude.. I grew up here. where did you grow up? I listed Bill Clinton purposely. Which tells me you weren't reading my response to give a thoughtful response. No matter what I posted, it obviously would be ignored.. Bill Clinton is the proof
You just joined Coach and Dos Equis. Congratulations
-
Dude.. I grew up here. where did you grow up? I listed Bill Clinton purposely. Which tells me you weren't reading my response to give a thoughtful response. No matter what I posted, it obviously would be ignored.. Bill Clinton is the proof
You just joined Coach and Dos Equis. Congratulations
So you have no answer to my questions? Why are you holding Trump to a standard that the rest of the Presidents, including the current one, don't have to abide by?
It sounds like you're putting me in good company, men who can think for themselves without MSM telling them their "truth".
-
So you have no answer to my questions? Why are you holding Trump to a standard that the rest of the Presidents, including the current one, don't have to abide by?
It sounds like you're putting me in good company, men who can think for themselves without MSM telling them their "truth".
I'm saying, given Nixon, given Clinton, Trump is worse. What part is over your head?
-
I'm saying, given Nixon, given Clinton, Trump is worse. What part is over your head?
Not policy wise which should be the only thing that counts
-
I'm saying, given Nixon, given Clinton, Trump is worse. What part is over your head?
Nothing gets over my pointy head, flatfoot.
That is a matter of opinion.
-
Nothing gets over my pointy head, flatfoot.
That is a matter of opinion.
meaningless response but ok..
-
Yes, that would be same impeachments where the prosecution got lit up or did you not read about that?
The same impeachments that still stand on the record today?
-
So you have no answer to my questions? Why are you holding Trump to a standard that the rest of the Presidents, including the current one, don't have to abide by?
It sounds like you're putting me in good company, men who can think for themselves without MSM telling them their "truth".
No. Trump is being held to a standard of accountability. As in being responsible for your actions. If he didn't do that shit he did, then he wouldn't be facing indictments for it. Pretty simple.
-
Personally, in a perfect world, I’m hoping for Biden’s impeachment, followed by removal, followed by a trial with the outcome of guilty of treason (it’s warranted by definition) with the sentence of death by firing squad.
-
Personally, in a perfect world, retards actually post evidence of their bullshit claims and conspiracy theories they fall for.
But since they don't all we can do is point and laugh at them.
-
meaningless response but ok..
Not my fault it went over your head.
-
Personally, in a perfect world, I’m hoping for Biden’s impeachment, followed by removal, followed by a trial with the outcome of guilty of treason (it’s warranted by definition) with the sentence of death by firing squad.
I know you know none of that is going to happen. The best bet would be an impeachment which as we have seen doesn't mean much.
-
I know you know none of that is going to happen. The best bet would be an impeachment which as we have seen doesn't mean much.
With weak as republicans leading the way, nothing will be pursued, he'll never even be investigated.