Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: LurkerNoMore on October 03, 2024, 01:26:28 PM
-
NINE YEARS. :D :D :D
How happy are you Trumpturds now? You are always crying about election interference. Every accusation is a confession. :D :D :D
---
Former County Clerk Gets 9 Years in Prison for Tampering With Voting Machines
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=tina+peters+sentenced
Tina Peters is headed to prison.
The former Mesa County Clerk was sentenced to nine years of incarceration, most of which will be served in the Colorado Department of Corrections.
Her sentencing was handed down in a packed courtroom Thursday that included supporters of Peters, several uniformed sheriff’s deputies and local elected officials. Interested parties also gathered just outside the courtroom, streaming the proceedings on their phones from feet away.
Peters was found guilty by a jury of Mesa County residents in August on seven counts, including four felonies after she helped facilitate unauthorized access to county voting equipment that she was supposed to safeguard.
During Thursday’s hearing, the prosecution argued that Peters should face the maximum penalty for each charge and said Peters should serve time in prison, noting her lack of contrition even after she was found guilty.
“I don’t think anybody in this room would make a straight-faced argument that Mrs. Peters has demonstrated any respect for the law,” 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein said.
Ahead of sentencing, Peters asked 21st Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett for probation. She said she recognized the jury’s decision but that the jury wasn’t allowed to hear other evidence she wanted to present. That evidence was largely tied to conspiracies about Dominion Voting Machines, which were ruled inadmissible.
As he handed down the sentence, Barrett said Peters is privileged compared to the usual defendants he sees, and that she had not shown remorse. He preceded his sentence with a blistering critique of her actions and attitude, calling her an attention-seeking charlatan peddling snake oil “time and time again.”
“I'm convinced you would do it all over again if you could,” Barrett said. “You’re as defiant a defendant as this court has seen.”
---
-
Very interdasting!
-
What? No Trumpy nut hugger wants to comment? This is a clear cut case of that "election interference" your morons keeps whining about. Nothing to say? Maybe mention what a great patriot Tina is? Or maybe how her sentencing is an attempt to sway the 2024 election? Or... or... maybe how she is just a political prisoner?
Nothing? :D :D :D :D hypocritical bitches.
-
What? No Trumpy nut hugger wants to comment? This is a clear cut case of that "election interference" your morons keeps whining about. Nothing to say? Maybe mention what a great patriot Tina is? Or maybe how her sentencing is an attempt to sway the 2024 election? Or... or... maybe how she is just a political prisoner?
Nothing? :D :D :D :D hypocritical bitches.
🤣🤣🤣
-
🤣🤣🤣
For people who whine so much, all you have to do to shut Trumpturds up is just post facts.
-
the jury wasn’t allowed to hear other evidence she wanted to present. That evidence was largely tied to conspiracies about Dominion Voting Machines, which were ruled inadmissible.
Interesting. What were they afraid of?
-
Interesting. What were they afraid of?
I read two articles on this, but not sure what the big "gotcha" thing is here.
This woman adamantly believes she witnessed something nefarious, which you can see by her testimony.
However, you should not resort to anything illegal to prove yourself unless you're willing to face consequences.
Regardless of political affiliation, there is distrust in our election system, which is precisely what our enemies are trying to create.
We should have the technology to make manipulation impossible, but here we are again with ballot harvesting, mail in ballots, no ID required....
-
Interesting. What were they afraid of?
They were not afraid of anything. You posted the reason why.
That evidence was largely tied to conspiracies about Dominion Voting Machines, which were ruled inadmissible.
-
I read two articles on this, but not sure what the big "gotcha" thing is here.
This woman adamantly believes she witnessed something nefarious, which you can see by her testimony.
However, you should not resort to anything illegal to prove yourself unless you're willing to face consequences.
Regardless of political affiliation, there is distrust in our election system, which is precisely what our enemies are trying to create.
We should have the technology to make manipulation impossible, but here we are again with ballot harvesting, mail in ballots, no ID required....
The big "gotcha" isn't really relative to this woman. It's actually relative to pointing out :
This is a clear cut case of that "election interference" your morons keeps whining about. Nothing to say?
For people constantly whining about election interference, they sure are quiet when an actual example is posted.
-
For people who whine so much, all you have to do to shut Trumpturds up is just post facts.
Exactly. They don't like facts. It's their kryptonite.
-
The big "gotcha" isn't really relative to this woman. It's actually relative to pointing out :
For people constantly whining about election interference, they sure are quiet when an actual example is posted.
How is it election interference, she did this after the election in an attempt to prove fraud.
At least that's how I read it.
Anyway, my positon has been focused more on big tech empheral data cultivation, attempted silencing of individuals and stories, lawfare and such as it pertains to election interference. Those are provable.
I'm sure there was fraud elsewhere with mail in ballots, etc as it would be stupid to think in a country with 330 million that some elements of fraud would not occur, but since it's not provable or known in terms of materiality, I rarely bother commenting or reading about it.
-
GREAT AMERICAN GREAT REPUBLICAN!
MAGA
-
How is it election interference, she did this after the election in an attempt to prove fraud.
At least that's how I read it.
Anyway, my positon has been focused more on big tech empheral data cultivation, attempted silencing of individuals and stories, lawfare and such as it pertains to election interference. Those are provable.
I'm sure there was fraud elsewhere with mail in ballots, etc as it would be stupid to think in a country with 330 million that some elements of fraud would not occur, but since it's not provable or known in terms of materiality, I rarely bother commenting or reading about it.
You don't think trying to manipulate votes and election outcomes in order to overthrow the 2020 is not "interference?"
-
You don't think trying to manipulate votes and election outcomes in order to overthrow the 2020 is not "interference?"
Maybe I didn't understand the article - I thought what she did was AFTER the election to try to prove someone else interferred.
I'll go re-read.
-
For people who whine so much, all you have to do to shut Trumpturds up is just post facts.
Demturds and facts, hmmm... :D
Yes, they are full of 'em.
Pregnant men, lots of genders, men w/ tampons, men in little girls locker rooms, the great border, cocaine in white-house, gay sex in white-house board room,
Ashley rape, kid-molesting, kid-mutilation, fake climate stuff, Willie Brown, Kakkle-kvnt (she's full of facts) etc... Just full of facts...
Pubturds arent much better, but Libz take top prize for insanity, lies and overall mental illness...