Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 26, 2025, 08:14:04 PM
-
"@peterticktin now states plainly without reservation that the difference between the 2020 election & the 2024 election was that computers operating in Serbia were not blocked in 2020 but WERE blocked in 2024 allowing an accurate count of the actual 2024 presidential votes."
https://x.com/rasmussen_poll/status/1982101145293086757?s=46
-
::)
-
I've never gotten into the whole dominion thing, because I know it's never going to be proven one way or the other.
However, this DID happen, and hopefully they are held accountable.
https://x.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1982494703368179991
-
its been proven beyond a doubt that nothing happened.
The fact that anyone believes this pathological liar is funny to me.
Dude said yesterday that the ad canada made was fake and likely AI lolol. Just brutally lying through his fucking teeth.
There is zero evidence anything other then trump being a thin skinned narc happened in 2020. Guy was claiming victory when only 50% of the votes were counted. It's a pretty common tactic among those with personality disorders. His dad really did a number on him.
-
its been proven beyond a doubt that nothing happened.
The fact that anyone believes this pathological liar is funny to me.
Dude said yesterday that the ad canada made was fake and likely AI lolol. Just brutally lying through his fucking teeth.
There is zero evidence anything other then trump being a thin skinned narc happened in 2020. Guy was claiming victory when only 50% of the votes were counted. It's a pretty common tactic among those with personality disorders. His dad really did a number on him.
Just provide links to your statements and we're good. I wasn't disputing dominion one way or another, just saying I never gave it any thought.
However, there IS evidence of the prior admin colluding with big tech to suppress stories. There IS evidence of getting 51 "experts" to cast doubt on the laptop AFTER it was already authenticated. There IS evidence of corruption in Russiagate.
So, no matter how many times you say there's zero evidence, it's just not true.
-
Just provide links to your statements and we're good. I wasn't disputing dominion one way or another, just saying I never gave it any thought.
However, there IS evidence of the prior admin colluding with big tech to suppress stories. There IS evidence of getting 51 "experts" to cast doubt on the laptop AFTER it was already authenticated. There IS evidence of corruption in Russiagate.
So, no matter how many times you say there's zero evidence, it's just not true.
Pronoun boy is yo far gone for anything you say to affect his
warped thinking.
Ask why he's so wrapped up in Donald when he lives Canada & it's
pretty fucked up there with Trudie in charge.
-
Just provide links to your statements and we're good. I wasn't disputing dominion one way or another, just saying I never gave it any thought.
However, there IS evidence of the prior admin colluding with big tech to suppress stories. There IS evidence of getting 51 "experts" to cast doubt on the laptop AFTER it was already authenticated. There IS evidence of corruption in Russiagate.
So, no matter how many times you say there's zero evidence, it's just not true.
Zero evidence
https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections
there is overwhelming evidence that there was nothing there, just more bullshit from the conman himself.
The guy is a conman and liar, how can you not see that? dude just slapped 10% tariffs on canada over an ad that he said was AI when the video is up for everyone to see. It's also free use, so his claim it was fraudulently used and that they are seeking legal action is retarded. The guy is filling his pockets and will pull this shit again for the midterms.
-
Zero evidence
https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections
there is overwhelming evidence that there was nothing there, just more bullshit from the conman himself.
The guy is a conman and liar, how can you not see that? dude just slapped 10% tariffs on canada over an ad that he said was AI when the video is up for everyone to see. It's also free use, so his claim it was fraudulently used and that they are seeking legal action is retarded. The guy is filling his pockets and will pull this shit again for the midterms.
Thank you for the link.
But there was election interference in terms of the laptop story being censored, which could have changed the outcome. In addition, mail in ballots are ripe for fraud. I personally believe they should restore that for folk and military members overseas, and require in person voting, using a valid ID for verification.
The video was misleading and selectively edited so Regan appeared to be saying something he wasn't. Listen to the whole thing. So fuck Canada for that. Enjoy your tariff. Maybe you guys can stop buying our bourbon again and drink your shitty Canadian versions.
-
Thank you for the link.
But there was election interference in terms of the laptop story being censored, which could have changed the outcome. In addition, mail in ballots are ripe for fraud. I personally believe they should restore that for folk and military members overseas, and require in person voting, using a valid ID for verification.
The video was misleading and selectively edited so Regan appeared to be saying something he wasn't. Listen to the whole thing. So fuck Canada for that. Enjoy your tariff. Maybe you guys can stop buying our bourbon again and drink your shitty Canadian versions.
Oregon has exclusively used mail in ballots since 1995 with almost no insidence of fraud. There have been 38 criminal convictions for voter fraud in Oregon out of 61 million ballots cast between 2000 and 2019, amounting to a rate of 0.00006%.
-
Oregon has exclusively used mail in ballots since 1995 with almost no insidence of fraud. There have been 38 criminal convictions for voter fraud in Oregon out of 61 million ballots cast between 2000 and 2019, amounting to a rate of 0.00006%.
Fraud by its nature is done in secret, with people trying to cover their tracks, so it's not reasonable to base the frequency of fraud on criminal convictions. The best criminals never get caught.
-
Zero evidence
https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections
there is overwhelming evidence that there was nothing there, just more bullshit from the conman himself.
The guy is a conman and liar, how can you not see that? dude just slapped 10% tariffs on canada over an ad that he said was AI when the video is up for everyone to see. It's also free use, so his claim it was fraudulently used and that they are seeking legal action is retarded. The guy is filling his pockets and will pull this shit again for the midterms.
Hey bud, I was on that conference call with Bill Stepien the night of the election in real time watching the same numbers that trump was winning by a landslide on, flip to Biden before they magically stopped the recount then miraculously when the recount resumed Biden was in the margin of error. There isn't just proof, there is HARD evidence to support it. Mr."I'm a moderate"
I'm also calling bullshit that you're a "doctor"
-
Fraud by its nature is done in secret, with people trying to cover their tracks, so it's not reasonable to base the frequency of fraud on criminal convictions. The best criminals never get caught.
How would you know that? if they don't get caught you have zero data to base any claim on.
-
Thank you for the link.
But there was election interference in terms of the laptop story being censored, which could have changed the outcome. In addition, mail in ballots are ripe for fraud. I personally believe they should restore that for folk and military members overseas, and require in person voting, using a valid ID for verification.
The video was misleading and selectively edited so Regan appeared to be saying something he wasn't. Listen to the whole thing. So fuck Canada for that. Enjoy your tariff. Maybe you guys can stop buying our bourbon again and drink your shitty Canadian versions.
He is against broad tariffs and I watched the whole video unedited, he is saying exactly what it purports. Protectionism is stupid and has always failed you guys have lost manufacturing jobs 5 months in a row and inflation is increasing, exactly what reagan claimed would happen.
I couldn't care less about trump taxing you guys more, its simply juvenile to let an add cause you to meltdown and slap 10% tariffs on your biggest trading partner willy nilly via late night tweet.
-
Hey bud, I was on that conference call with Bill Stepien the night of the election in real time watching the same numbers that trump was winning by a landslide on, flip to Biden before they magically stopped the recount then miraculously when the recount resumed Biden was in the margin of error. There isn't just proof, there is HARD evidence to support it. Mr."I'm a moderate"
I'm also calling bullshit that you're a "doctor"
Ok bud, you got the hard evidence. I am sure the fact that the cases were based on misinformation leading to potential disbarments and release the kraken lady saying no reasonable person would believe what we said makes perfect sense to you.
You should bring some of the hard evidence to the courts, apparently no one else has it as EVERY single case was thrown out and found wanting aka trump is a conman and full of shit.
You are delusional. I don't hold moderate views because there is no evidence a crime was committed, no charges laid despite numerous court cases and suits and nothing ever done about it? Nevermind that trump is a known conman and grifter and FRAUD. This is called projection. Trump suffers with what is known as a cluster b disorder, the guy cheats at everything, golf, memecoins, his wife, everything.
So I should disregard all the evidence that there is in favor of what? blind belief? You should read the definition of hard evidence again for me lil fella.
Do you think I give a fuck about what you think about what I am or am not? lol... you keep bringing this up, its very odd. Again this is called projection, an ego defense. The death drive is strong in you, hitching your wagon to a demagogue.
-
Oregon has exclusively used mail in ballots since 1995 with almost no insidence of fraud. There have been 38 criminal convictions for voter fraud in Oregon out of 61 million ballots cast between 2000 and 2019, amounting to a rate of 0.00006%.
How would you know?
The problem with mail in ballots is you don't actually know who filled it out and sent it.
-
He is against broad tariffs and I watched the whole video unedited, he is saying exactly what it purports. Protectionism is stupid and has always failed you guys have lost manufacturing jobs 5 months in a row and inflation is increasing, exactly what reagan claimed would happen.
I couldn't care less about trump taxing you guys more, its simply juvenile to let an add cause you to meltdown and slap 10% tariffs on your biggest trading partner willy nilly via late night tweet.
Regan was talking about not going first with imposing protectionist tariffs and readying yourself for a global economy. Not that using tariffs to level the playing field or as a negotiating tool is necessarily bad.
-
How would you know that? if they don't get caught you have zero data to base any claim on.
Personal experience. :-*
LOL @ the democrats investigating democrat corruption and finding no wrong doing. ;D
-
Regan was talking about not going first with imposing protectionist tariffs and readying yourself for a global economy. Not that using tariffs to level the playing field or as a negotiating tool is necessarily bad.
he was clearly against protectionism, i mean the quotes are pretty clear. He was only for using tariffs to protect key areas, even then he wasn't a fan of protectionism. Did you watch the full video its lifted from?
-
Personal experience. :-*
LOL @ the democrats investigating democrat corruption and finding no wrong doing. ;D
i will backtrace your ip and have the cyber police contact you.
-
Ok bud, you got the hard evidence. I am sure the fact that the cases were based on misinformation leading to potential disbarments and release the kraken lady saying no reasonable person would believe what we said makes perfect sense to you.
You should bring some of the hard evidence to the courts, apparently no one else has it as EVERY single case was thrown out and found wanting aka trump is a conman and full of shit.
You are delusional. I don't hold moderate views because there is no evidence a crime was committed, no charges laid despite numerous court cases and suits and nothing ever done about it? Nevermind that trump is a known conman and grifter and FRAUD. This is called projection. Trump suffers with what is known as a cluster b disorder, the guy cheats at everything, golf, memecoins, his wife, everything.
So I should disregard all the evidence that there is in favor of what? blind belief? You should read the definition of hard evidence again for me lil fella.
Do you think I give a fuck about what you think about what I am or am not? lol... you keep bringing this up, its very odd. Again this is called projection, an ego defense. The death drive is strong in you, hitching your wagon to a demagogue.
Dude you are talking to a wannabe LARPer that pretends he is one of the LE and military "boys".
-
Personal experience. :-*
LOL @ the democrats investigating democrat corruption and finding no wrong doing. ;D
Sort of like MAGAtards investigating MAGAtard corruption and finding no wrong doing. Even if the other MAGAtard pled guilty and admitted to crimes.
-
Dude you are talking to a wannabe LARPer that pretends he is one of the LE and military "boys".
You’re more delusional than Necrosis
-
i will backtrace your ip and have the cyber police contact you.
They'll have to get in line behind the alphabet agencies.
-
How would you know that? if they don't get caught you have zero data to base any claim on.
Because fraud by it's nature is done in secret with people trying to cover their tracks. And I know from life experience that the best criminals don't get caught. It's sort of common sense.
-
Because fraud by it's nature is done in secret with people trying to cover their tracks. And I know from life experience that the best criminals don't get caught. It's sort of common sense.
so anecdotal evidence is what you are using, interesting.
so the metric you are using is not getting caught which by its very nature leaves no discernable way to compare or contrast and this is the best evidence to go on and common sense? it's certainly a claim but by no means is it common sense. Even if I grant you its "common sense" it is not good sense whatsoever.
Common sense doesn't get the job done in complex situations requiring wisdom and expert knowledge. I know this common sense thing is a recent talking point but good sense is much more valuable in these scenarios.
Based on the complexity of the crime the chances of getting caught would increase drastically, if I steal a candy bar there is a low chance anyone will put in any effort to catch me vs bernie madoff who did get caught but pulled of a far more lucrative, complex fraud. You are suggesting that the candy bar thief is the better criminal because he didnt get caught? There is zero good sense in that because it's simplified the idea down to a binary which is not reasonable at all and hides under the veil of common sense when really all things like this do is use reductionism like a terrorist and make a caricature of reality so you can digest it simply and move on.
common sense is like not touching a hot stove, it lacks critical thinking for the most part. Not something I would hang my entire worldview on.
-
Fraud by its nature is done in secret, with people trying to cover their tracks, so it's not reasonable to base the frequency of fraud on criminal convictions. The best criminals never get caught.
Sort of like fake electors casting phony ballots?
-
You’re more delusional than Necrosis
Nobody is more delusional than some midget getting dressed in his tactical diaper and pretending to be LE or military when everyone knows he couldn't pass the basic entry requirements for either field.
-
How would you know?
The problem with mail in ballots is you don't actually know who filled it out and sent it.
There are four registered voters in our household, all of which are Democrats. None of us fills out another voters ballot. None of us would bother trying to copy one another's signature, besides what would be the point? My wife passed away 15 years ago. No ballots have been mailed to her since her passing.
Each ballot is sent with a return envelope that contains a unique identifier and a space for the voter's signature.
When the ballot is returned, election workers scan the envelope's barcode to match it to the voter's registration. The signature is then compared with the one(s) stored in the voter registration record.
While election workers are trained to spot specific characteristics in signatures, some counties also use software to aid the verification process. A voter's signature may change over time, and election workers are trained to account for these natural variations.
Once a signature is verified, the ballot is separated from its envelope to preserve the voter's anonymity. Only after verification is the ballot prepared for tabulation.
https://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Pages/security.aspx
-
Personal experience. :-*
LOL @ the democrats investigating democrat corruption and finding no wrong doing. ;D
Republicans investigating republican corruption and finding no wrongdoing. ;D
House and Senate committees are made up of both democrats and republicans.
Democrats investigating republican corruption.
Republicans investigating democrat corruption.
Senate and party rules determine the distribution on coveted committee seats more broadly throughout each party conference.
-
Republicans investigating republican corruption and finding no wrongdoing. ;D
House and Senate committees are made up of both democrats and republicans.
Democrats investigating republican corruption.
Republicans investigating democrat corruption.
Senate and party rules determine the distribution on coveted committee seats more broadly throughout each party conference.
Any government investigating itself has retards to govern.
-
There are four registered voters in our household, all of which are Democrats. None of us fills out another voters ballot. None of us would bother trying to copy one another's signature, besides what would be the point? My wife passed away 15 years ago. No ballots have been mailed to her since her passing.
Each ballot is sent with a return envelope that contains a unique identifier and a space for the voter's signature.
When the ballot is returned, election workers scan the envelope's barcode to match it to the voter's registration. The signature is then compared with the one(s) stored in the voter registration record.
While election workers are trained to spot specific characteristics in signatures, some counties also use software to aid the verification process. A voter's signature may change over time, and election workers are trained to account for these natural variations.
Once a signature is verified, the ballot is separated from its envelope to preserve the voter's anonymity. Only after verification is the ballot prepared for tabulation.
https://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Pages/security.aspx
What about ballot harvesting?
But regardless, you could EASILY take all four of those and fill them out yourself.
There is no reason for any covid induced voting processes to continue.
It should be a national holiday, everyone votes in person, ID required, and for the very few who supposedly can't "afford" an ID, a free, state issued one should be given.
We need to restore faith in this system, for everyone, and for the good of the country.
-
What about ballot harvesting?
But regardless, you could EASILY take all four of those and fill them out yourself.
There is no reason for any covid induced voting processes to continue.
It should be a national holiday, everyone votes in person, ID required, and for the very few who supposedly can't "afford" an ID, a free, state issued one should be given.
We need to restore faith in this system, for everyone, and for the good of the country.
You're going to confuse him.
-
You're going to confuse him.
When & where ever possible tolk should get up off your lazy fat arses & go vote in person with
Thier ID - How Fucking difficult is that - Lazy people will soon loose the use of their legs.
-
What about ballot harvesting?
But regardless, you could EASILY take all four of those and fill them out yourself.
There is no reason for any covid induced voting processes to continue.
It should be a national holiday, everyone votes in person, ID required, and for the very few who supposedly can't "afford" an ID, a free, state issued one should be given.
We need to restore faith in this system, for everyone, and for the good of the country.
If I were to fill all four ballots myself, I am certain my family would object. Not only that, my signature would not match theirs.
Once again, vote by mail in Oregon has been exclusive since 1995, long before anyone ever heard of COVID.
You must be registered to vote order to receive a ballot.
In order to register to vote in Oregon, one must provide ID.
To register online, you must provide your:
Current, valid Oregon driver's license number
Current, valid Oregon permit number
Current, valid Oregon state ID card number
If you do not have an Oregon DMV-issued ID, you can register using a paper form. First-time registrants in the state requires providing either your Social Security number or a copy of one of the following documents that shows your name and current address:
Valid photo identification
Paycheck stub
Utility bill
Bank statement
Government document
-
What about ballot harvesting?
But regardless, you could EASILY take all four of those and fill them out yourself.
There is no reason for any covid induced voting processes to continue.
It should be a national holiday, everyone votes in person, ID required, and for the very few who supposedly can't "afford" an ID, a free, state issued one should be given.
We need to restore faith in this system, for everyone, and for the good of the country.
Do you realize that the majority of election voting fraud was committed by MAGA in 2020? So this is not illegals voting.
-
Do you realize that the majority of election voting fraud was committed by MAGA in 2020? So this is not illegals voting.
Then why is Newsom so upset about ICE being at voting centers in CA? :D
-
Then why is Newsom so upset about ICE being at voting centers in CA? :D
If you possessed basic reading skills, you would know.
---
Newsom warns that immigration-enforcement agents (namely ICE or U.S. Customs and Border Protection/Border Patrol) might show up at polling booths or in their vicinity on Election Day in California.
He claims this is part of a broader pattern: federal forces (including election monitors sent by the U.S. Department of Justice) are being used to intimidate voters and lay groundwork for challenging election results.
Newsom specifically tied this concern to Proposition 50 (a California measure on congressional redistricting) and said the timing and targeted counties raise suspicion
---
-
If you possessed basic reading skills, you would know.
---
Newsom warns that immigration-enforcement agents (namely ICE or U.S. Customs and Border Protection/Border Patrol) might show up at polling booths or in their vicinity on Election Day in California.
He claims this is part of a broader pattern: federal forces (including election monitors sent by the U.S. Department of Justice) are being used to intimidate voters and lay groundwork for challenging election results.
Newsom specifically tied this concern to Proposition 50 (a California measure on congressional redistricting) and said the timing and targeted counties raise suspicion
---
Isn't that an over reaction by him, surely he would want only legal Americans to be able to vote.
As long as the ICE / US customs are doing their job any legal person has zero reason to feel
Intimidated. I find that just a very poor excuse.
Fair elections should be the main priority.
-
If I were to fill all four ballots myself, I am certain my family would object. Not only that, my signature would not match theirs.
Once again, vote by mail in Oregon has been exclusive since 1995, long before anyone ever heard of COVID.
You must be registered to vote order to receive a ballot.
In order to register to vote in Oregon, one must provide ID.
To register online, you must provide your:
Current, valid Oregon driver's license number
Current, valid Oregon permit number
Current, valid Oregon state ID card number
If you do not have an Oregon DMV-issued ID, you can register using a paper form. First-time registrants in the state requires providing either your Social Security number or a copy of one of the following documents that shows your name and current address:
Valid photo identification
Paycheck stub
Utility bill
Bank statement
Government document
Regardless, of whether your family objects or not, you could do it.
It is without question it's easier to commit fraud with mail in ballots than in person voting with an ID.
-
Nobody is more delusional than some midget getting dressed in his tactical diaper and pretending to be LE or military when everyone knows he couldn't pass the basic entry requirements for either field.
You try so hard..lol
-
Sort of like fake electors casting phony ballots?
Last I checked they were exonerate...try again.
-
Do you realize that the majority of election voting fraud was committed by MAGA in 2020? So this is not illegals voting.
No..tell us more. hahahaha
-
If you possessed basic reading skills, you would know.
---
Newsom warns that immigration-enforcement agents (namely ICE or U.S. Customs and Border Protection/Border Patrol) might show up at polling booths or in their vicinity on Election Day in California.
He claims this is part of a broader pattern: federal forces (including election monitors sent by the U.S. Department of Justice) are being used to intimidate voters and lay groundwork for challenging election results.
Newsom specifically tied this concern to Proposition 50 (a California measure on congressional redistricting) and said the timing and targeted counties raise suspicion
---
Why would American citizens be concerned about ice being at polling booths? Unless, of course, Newscum is worried that his illegal friends that he cares about more than US citizens wouldn't show up to vote.
-
so anecdotal evidence is what you are using, interesting.
so the metric you are using is not getting caught which by its very nature leaves no discernable way to compare or contrast and this is the best evidence to go on and common sense? it's certainly a claim but by no means is it common sense. Even if I grant you its "common sense" it is not good sense whatsoever.
Common sense doesn't get the job done in complex situations requiring wisdom and expert knowledge. I know this common sense thing is a recent talking point but good sense is much more valuable in these scenarios.
Based on the complexity of the crime the chances of getting caught would increase drastically, if I steal a candy bar there is a low chance anyone will put in any effort to catch me vs bernie madoff who did get caught but pulled of a far more lucrative, complex fraud. You are suggesting that the candy bar thief is the better criminal because he didnt get caught? There is zero good sense in that because it's simplified the idea down to a binary which is not reasonable at all and hides under the veil of common sense when really all things like this do is use reductionism like a terrorist and make a caricature of reality so you can digest it simply and move on.
common sense is like not touching a hot stove, it lacks critical thinking for the most part. Not something I would hang my entire worldview on.
Common sense isn't a recent talking point. Where are you getting that from?
I don't think I can it explain it any simpler. The best serial killers have never been caught. The best spies have never been caught. Your candy bar hypothetical is silly.
-
Common sense isn't a recent talking point. Where are you getting that from?
I don't think I can it explain it any simpler. The best serial killers have never been caught. The best spies have never been caught. Your candy bar hypothetical is silly.
you can't explain it any simpler because your explanation is non-sensical as my point proved. You may not like it but your metric of best is incredibly simplistic and makes no sense. Repeating it despite being proven wrong doesn't make it right.
Again, someone who has killed 100 people vs 4 is a serial killer, the person who killed 100 increases the chances of being caught exponetially.
Coach keeps saying common sense, trump says it, news outlets are using it meahwhile I don't think any of them actually know what common sense is and what it's limits are. There is no common sense when it comes to immigration, the economy, politics etc.. thats the purview of good sense.
-
You try so hard..lol
It wouldn't matter how hard you tried. You couldn't pass entry requirements for TSA or a mall cop.
-
Last I checked they were exonerate...try again.
Might want to check the rest of them then.
-
Why would American citizens be concerned about ice being at polling booths? Unless, of course, Newscum is worried that his illegal friends that he cares about more than US citizens wouldn't show up to vote.
They aren't. Only braindead MAGAtards are. Because they were spoonfed that CT about "stolen elections". ::)
-
They aren't. Only braindead MAGAtards are. Because they were spoonfed that CT about "stolen elections". ::)
"He claims this is part of a broader pattern: federal forces (including election monitors sent by the U.S. Department of Justice) are being used to intimidate voters and lay groundwork for challenging election results"
You're now contradicting yourself. ::)
-
They aren't. Only braindead MAGAtards are. Because they were spoonfed that CT about "stolen elections". ::)
Are you saying the governor of California is a braindead MAGAtard?
-
Are you saying the governor of California is a braindead MAGAtard?
Are you saying the governor of California believes the 2020 election was stolen?
-
Are you saying the governor of California believes the 2020 election was stolen?
100% fact that it was
-
100% fact that it was
You are the core trump voter, never met one in the wild.
As long as he makes you feel tough and you have someone to scapegoat he can pick your pockets clean.
-
Are you saying the governor of California believes the 2020 election was stolen?
Your reading comprehension is as bad as Primes. At least he has an excuse.
-
You are the core trump voter, never met one in the wild.
As long as he makes you feel tough and you have someone to scapegoat he can pick your pockets clean.
Not at all. I’m just not a weak minded lib that can see beyond the clickbait headlines and actually do research. I have the ability to actually gather information whether its fits your narrative or not and present it. Then once presented it’s up to you to competently refute it….
-
Not at all. I’m just not a weak minded lib that can see beyond the clickbait headlines and actually do research. I have the ability to actually gather information whether its fits your narrative or not and present it. Then once presented it’s up to you to competently refute it….
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO LOLOLOLOL.
It's been established you rarely read past the title, this is called projection. You need to go to therapy dawg.
Imagine thinking the guy who is grifting memecoins, selling hats and pretend coins on truth social is a beacon of truth lolol. The serial philanderer, bankrupter, con-man.
He is a fraud my guy.
-
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
It's been established you rarely read past the title, this is called projection. You need to go to therapy dawg.
Imagine thinking the guy who is grifting memecoins, selling hats and pretend coins on truth social is a beacon of truth lolol. The serial philanderer, bankrupter, con-man.
He is a fraud my guy.
Leave Joe Biden out of this
-
100% fact that it was
And yet you have posted absolutely ZERO facts over the years. ::)
It has become obvious you do not know what a fact is.
-
Your reading comprehension is as bad as Primes. At least he has an excuse.
Apparently not. Otherwise you would have known your post was irrelevant before making it. Yet, here you are.
-
Not at all. I’m just not a weak minded lib that can see beyond the clickbait headlines and actually do research. I have the ability to actually gather information whether its fits your narrative or not and present it. Then once presented it’s up to you to competently refute it….
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wooooooo..... I mean, stolen elections, fake birth certificates, pizza parlor sex rings in the basement (even if said pizza parlor doesn't have a basement), Covid assassinations, Japan invasions, I mean..
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
-
And yet you have posted absolutely ZERO facts over the years. ::)
It has become obvious you do not know what a fact is.
You keep right on believing that and to pile the proof on more...I bet you missed Grassley's press conference into "Arctic Freeze", didn't you, Mr. All over Jack Smith's nuts?
-
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
https://www.zoom.com
-
Apparently not. Otherwise you would have known your post was irrelevant before making it. Yet, here you are.
My post was on point and on topic, not my fault you're too fucking stupid to follow along. I guess that's why you vote democrat. :)
-
You keep right on believing that and to pile the proof on more...I bet you missed Grassley's press conference into "Arctic Freeze", didn't you, Mr. All over Jack Smith's nuts?
So you get all of your information from politicians, no wonder your world is full of clandestine actors with nefarious intentions perniciously sucking your ability to discern reality from spin.
-
You keep right on believing that and to pile the proof on more...I bet you missed Grassley's press conference into "Arctic Freeze", didn't you, Mr. All over Jack Smith's nuts?
So much proof yet you could never post any. Amazing combination.
-
https://www.zoom.com
Your prior statement only further proves the point that no one is wasting time debating a retard.
-
My post was on point and on topic, not my fault you're too fucking stupid to follow along. I guess that's why you vote democrat. :)
Of course it was. ::) On point and on topic to something completely irrelevant to what I posted. Good job. You smoking too much marijuana to have this much brain fog.
-
So you get all of your information from politicians, no wonder your world is full of clandestine actors with nefarious intentions perniciously sucking your ability to discern reality from spin.
He’s been challenged to post actual proof of these CTs he follows for years and can’t do it. He just posts more CTs and bullshit if he doesn’t try to dodge entirely.
-
So much proof yet you could never post any. Amazing combination.
STFU, I've posted TONS of proof in the way of hard evidence, not bullshit hearsay that leftists try to pass off as "proof" that no one could have refuted. Do a search. Tired of doing your homework for you.
-
He’s been challenged to post actual proof of these CTs he follows for years and can’t do it. He just posts more CTs and bullshit if he doesn’t try to dodge entirely.
As usual and like in true lib fashion, you're a fucking liar.