Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: udeluz on May 14, 2006, 07:21:07 PM
-
Looking to see if there is a AAS comperable to DECA?
-
BOLDABOL is pretty close.
-
Looking to see if there is a AAS comperable to DECA?
why man?? just take deca and suatanon along with some d-bol and winny and a little propionate
-
Just checking man, How are those gains coming John?
-
Looking to see if there is a AAS comperable to DECA?
Boldenone Undeclynate (Equipoise) has been compared closely to deca for years but I find this to be a bit inaccurate. Anthony Roberts has said that chemically they are not the same at all, chemically it is closer to dbol without the 17-alpha-methyl, but results are very different.
Duchaine originally made the comparison between Deca and Equipoise saying that EQ would be a much stronger version, but after further first hand research he found this to be very inaccurate. "Deca is actually a progestin and a 19-nor derived steroid whereas Equipoise is more closely related to testosterone (being only one double bond differrent)." Duchaine would retract his original statement finding that EQ ended up being much weaker then deca in terms of mass gains but that it was better for strength and vascularity...I strongly disagree with the strength statement.
In my experience, nothing can touch deca or even come close, it is one of the most solid compounds we have available to us in terms of mass and strength not to mention it's therapeutic effect on the joints. Although that is only a temporary relief, it is a very nice bonus.
Last off, all the worries and concerns about "deca dick" and excessive bloat are in short mis-guided concerns. If deca is used properly then these factors do not come in to play.
-
I dont like deca
i dont see the big hoop pla about it.
Ill stick with my test and sust mix i get better gains from those two then any other gear i have taken.
i do love my d-bol though when I have it.
-
I agree with ZEEK, I'm not crazy bout Deca either, I do love the EQ though ;)
-
I agree with ZEEK, I'm not crazy bout Deca either, I do love the EQ though ;)
That's fine, but I just don't agree with the EQ/deca comparisons so many people make...they are not the same.
-
is it not compared cause you have used it and it's not the same?
cause what I'm reading is that its almost close. and these are all different adds and articles,chemist and stuff. So is this comming from experience
-
is it not compared cause you have used it and it's not the same?
cause what I'm reading is that its almost close. and these are all different adds and articles,chemist and stuff. So is this comming from experience
My opinion is experienced based bro.
-
Thanks for all the replies bros, Im gonna stay with the Deca..This go around
-
I guess no deca or eq for me... :-\
-
My opinion is experienced based bro.
Yep....BIG JARNOLD speaks from his own personal experience....i myself havent used EQ but I love the strength and mass gains from deca....and for the 1st time in 4yrs my shoulder didnt hurt like hell all the time!!
-
Looking to see if there is a AAS comperable to DECA?
For what type of effects?
Anabolic or the Joint therapeutic qualities?
Specify.
DIV
-
anabolic
-
anabolic
I'd say EQ is weaker and Winstrol is probably about the same or slightly stronger than Deca.
Hope that gives you an idea.
DIV
-
The bottom line is, they're all different types of anabolics and yield different results, deca tends to give people a bloated, watery look.
EQ and winstrol give you a hard, veiny, full look.
-
The bottom line is, they're all different types of anabolics and yield different results, deca tends to give people a bloated, watery look.
EQ and winstrol give you a hard, veiny, full look.
I don't agree. The "look" comes from your diet and training. Most (not all) use EQ and winstrol during a "cutting" phase, when they're also increasing their aerobics and dialing in their diets. And yes, I've used 'em all.
-
I don't agree. The "look" comes from your diet and training. Most (not all) use EQ and winstrol during a "cutting" phase, when they're also increasing their aerobics and dialing in their diets. And yes, I've used 'em all.
Freaker is correct.
The "look" is based on your diet and the muscles are sculpted by your training. The drugs are the drugs regardless, it's just that when you are dieted down, their effects are manifested much more clearly.
People seem to think that using anabolics is the be all and end all to a cutter cycle when in reality, it's your diet and conditioning that matter more.
Drugs aren't everything.
DIV
-
Freaker is correct.
The "look" is based on your diet and the muscles are sculpted by your training. The drugs are the drugs regardless, it's just that when you are dieted down, their effects are manifested much more clearly.
People seem to think that using anabolics is the be all and end all to a cutter cycle when in reality, it's your diet and conditioning that matter more.
Drugs aren't everything.
DIV
well put as always DIV....JUICE is not and will never be the so called HOLY GRAIL....i would say how you look physique wise is 70% diet , 25% training / cardio , 5% drugs....sure they work and I love em...lol...but theres nothing magical about it!! have a good one bro
-
well put as always DIV....JUICE is not and will never be the so called HOLY GRAIL....i would say how you look physique wise is 70% diet , 25% training / cardio , 5% drugs....sure they work and I love em...lol...but theres nothing magical about it!! have a good one bro
Get to the gym, Michael! >:(
DIV