Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Bodybuilding Boards => Steroids Info & Hardcore => Topic started by: coldduck on June 02, 2006, 07:59:19 PM

Title: intravenous (iv)
Post by: coldduck on June 02, 2006, 07:59:19 PM

hey bros have any of you applied somatropin intravenous , or know anyone who has and what kind of results did they get

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: Luv2Hurt on June 03, 2006, 05:52:40 AM

Sounds like a very bad idea.  Absorption is ideal in the sub-Q layer anyhow.  Why do you want to do this?

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: coldduck on June 03, 2006, 06:53:52 AM

i have used over 4 different kinds of growth and i have always injected under the skin and got ok results but once i injected straight into the vein i immediately got huge results.i was also told that you lose a certain percentage of growth by going under the skin because of your body temp

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: Arnold jr on June 03, 2006, 10:33:01 AM

Quote from: coldduck on June 03, 2006, 06:53:52 AM

i was also told that you lose a certain percentage of growth by going under the skin because of your body temp

Where did you hear this and what is the logic behind it?

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: coldduck on June 03, 2006, 11:01:39 AM

i've talked to different national bodybuilders and i was told that doing it sub-q you do not get 100% of the growth , the next step is to go intramuscular and add 1ml of bacteriastatic water and for best results go intravenously. now that is just jinitropin and gentropin that i have used. right now at 6.3" 1/2 i am 334lbs .i did the 2005 north american at 278lbs so i am hoping that doing this this way will be better for me , again bros thanks for your feed back   

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: mem on June 03, 2006, 12:02:27 PM

Likely PH issues . . .
not compatible

NOT needed and
probably would not
even work . . .

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: freakfestMD on June 03, 2006, 01:06:43 PM

I think I'd agree with that one mem.  GH is not suppossed to be taken i.v., although I would say I have no experience with it in that way.  IM/sub Q drugs are made to be that way for a reason.

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: coldduck on June 03, 2006, 01:23:50 PM

help me out bros what is ,PH issues, and again thank you all for your info 

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: mem on June 03, 2006, 03:09:18 PM

PH is the alkaline or acidic nature of substances.
very *polar properties* - eg: like night or day.

Phosphoric acid (like Coca-Cola) is the chemical
that is added to Hgh (from factory) listed on
the label, to *adjust it* for introduction or
*acceptance by* use in the body.

Plus taking it sub-cutaneously you get a lasting
principle of lypolysis (fat loss), local to that area.
One of my favorite benefits . . .

Title: Re: intravenous (iv)
Post by: coldduck on June 03, 2006, 04:36:48 PM

thanks MEM for that info , but the (IV) has worked for me ,the sub-q with the fat loss , i did not see a lot of fat loss but that was me, but thanks again for taking the time out to educate me