Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ieffinhatecardio on June 13, 2006, 09:16:54 AM

Title: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on June 13, 2006, 09:16:54 AM
Many posters have stated that you were a police officer, if this is true then you would have known that slander/libel/defamation isn't a criminal offense, they are civil offenses.

A person committing libel can be sued for monetary damages but not sent to jail.

Why didn't you inform Kamali of this when he said Rob could go to jail?
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: jaejonna on June 13, 2006, 09:22:53 AM
Because Chic's brain is as big as kamalis biceps
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: ether on June 13, 2006, 09:28:04 AM
Because Chic's brain is as big as kamalis biceps

Consider yourself sued and going to jail. ::)
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: jaejonna on June 13, 2006, 09:28:53 AM
Im in jail already with my freind Craig....
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: phyxsius on June 13, 2006, 09:29:29 AM
Because Chic's brain is as big as kamalis biceps

Careful mate.. Chic might sue you and you'll end up in longer term  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on June 13, 2006, 09:57:00 AM
Bump for the truth.


Before this thread gets deleted.
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: HUGEPECS on June 13, 2006, 10:29:28 AM
you guys are on thin ice :-X
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on June 13, 2006, 10:31:57 AM
you guys are on thin ice :-X

Well, it is nearly summer.
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: body88 on June 13, 2006, 11:20:50 AM
Thin ice! King could never win a lawsuit against 240. The laws are very strict on that matter. Just because someone bad mouths you does not mean you can sue them. It is not that easy. King is full of shit. All these guys think they are tough due to the fact they a heavily muscled. What is king 5'6.... Rob should just laugh at this and laugh at all the attention and business they give him.
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: benchthis on June 13, 2006, 11:47:14 AM
because there not really going to sue  ::)
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on June 13, 2006, 11:51:09 AM
because there not really going to sue  ::)

they're

Whether or not they are going to sue isn't the point. Kamali made a statement that was patently untrue and Chick knew it.

Why didn't he just calmly say "Rob can be sued for monetary damages but he can't go to jail" for libel. It would have been quick and easy, instead he looks like he was agreeing with Kamali.
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: puredrive on June 13, 2006, 02:12:12 PM
with what rob said it is basically IMPOSSIBLE for king to win. that was just huff and puff talking on his part. libel is a very difficult thing to win. since opinions are not subject to libelous suits, it is often hard to actually charge that and make it happen. i could say right now that the redskins suck as a football team. that is my opinion. they couldnt sue me and win for that. i didnt ruin their public reputation or cause them any monetary harm that is provable. king only loses money becuase he cant come in shape and he has a shit physique that cant place high. that isnt 240's fault.
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: gordiano on June 13, 2006, 02:13:21 PM
Bump for the truth.


Before this thread gets deleted.

MEGA BUMP for the truth!
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: 240 is Back on June 13, 2006, 02:23:23 PM
http://thedabblingmum.com/writing/general/slanderlibel.htm

Which part of the trial would be the most fun? This one:

A final method of winning a defamation lawsuit is to prove that the reputation you’ve allegedly harmed was poor beforehand. If you’ve written a false statement about a local car dealership that sells lemons or skims cash from customers, you might be able to prove that the dealer already had a bad reputation before you stated it. When writing, try to back up your opinion with that of many others, as they can be called upon in a court situation later.
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on June 13, 2006, 02:24:42 PM
Rob, be honest, were you a little nervous about your doorbell ringing today?
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: 240 is Back on June 13, 2006, 02:26:15 PM
Rob, be honest, were you a little nervous about your doorbell ringing today?

lol... i did comb my hair in case i was going to be bitchslapped for a camera.

i was paranoid long before any of this happened lol...
Title: Re: Question for Chick: Why didn't you tell Kamali that libel isn't criminal?
Post by: gordiano on June 13, 2006, 02:39:38 PM
It would funny if it ever got to court...


Rob could play the innocent kid on the net, while blaming Kamali's outbursts and temper on the roids.

"Look at him, he's a steroid monster, your honor. Just look at him."

I'm sure you could easily make him meltdown in front of the judge........