Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Bast175 on June 16, 2006, 07:08:42 AM

Title: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: Bast175 on June 16, 2006, 07:08:42 AM
Look how much smaller and narrow he was back then:

(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/mclemag10.jpg)

(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/ron_n_ron.jpg)

(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/mclemag8.jpg)

Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: jaejonna on June 16, 2006, 07:11:18 AM
That last pic his arm looked small, 24 inches small ..
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: Hulkster on June 16, 2006, 02:07:48 PM
no no no, according to ND and Co, Ronnie in 1997 was the same as Ronnie 1999, just a bit harder ::)
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: delta9mda on June 16, 2006, 02:28:11 PM
gh is a hell of a drug
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: sculpture on June 16, 2006, 02:42:08 PM
no no no, according to ND and Co, Ronnie in 1997 was the same as Ronnie 1999, just a bit harder ::)

Beat me to it.

Everyone knows ronnie barely improved between 96 and 99. I mean come on, his bodyweight was practically the same throughout.

Duh..
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 16, 2006, 03:01:23 PM
no no no, according to ND and Co, Ronnie in 1997 was the same as Ronnie 1999, just a bit harder ::)
   ::)  ::)

I said he weighed almost the same  ;) 255lbs at the 97 Mr Olympia and he wasn't small by any stretch of the imagination !! ( and he also got beat by Dorian with had a torn bicep/tricep/quad  :-X )  :P
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: benchthis on June 16, 2006, 04:09:36 PM
   ::)  ::)

I said he weighed almost the same  ;) 255lbs at the 97 Mr Olympia and he wasn't small by any stretch of the imagination !! ( and he also got beat by Dorian with had a torn bicep/tricep/quad  :-X )  :P
he didnt get beat he got robbed
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on June 16, 2006, 04:15:14 PM
he didnt get beat he got robbed

Ronnie did a total of 11 Shows in 1997 he wasn't robbed just the victim of doing to many shows , peaking for 2 or 3 shows is hard enough times that by 3 and its easy to see why he was off .
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: sarcasm on June 16, 2006, 04:17:57 PM
he looks fucking HUGE in that third pic.
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: phyxsius on June 16, 2006, 04:30:45 PM
he looks fucking HUGE in that third pic.

well, the got bigger
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: Hulkster on June 16, 2006, 04:37:44 PM
(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/mclemag8.jpg)

to

(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/rc16.jpg)
 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: triple_pickle on June 16, 2006, 06:33:34 PM
Look how much smaller and narrow he was back then:

i wish i was that "smaller and narrow...."
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: Bast175 on June 16, 2006, 06:48:00 PM
i wish i was that "smaller and narrow...."

he was smaller RELAVITIVE to his later size.   Do you not understand that concept, tickle_pickle?
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: HERACLES on June 16, 2006, 07:12:58 PM
Look how much smaller and narrow he was back then:

(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/mclemag10.jpg)

(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/ron_n_ron.jpg)

(http://rwbazillion.com/pics/bodybuilding/mclemag8.jpg)



lol...small??   ???
Bodybuilders that are conisistent get better over time...bigger, etc...i wouldnt say he was small then..he looked/looks awesome..
Title: Re: Ronnie in 1997
Post by: youandme on June 16, 2006, 10:58:54 PM
well, the got bigger
LMAO everytime I see this