Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 06:22:58 PM

Title: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 06:22:58 PM
21 years old! His arms may not have been 22 inches but under 20? O please. Ps he might have been younger in that pic than 21 now that I look at it more.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: FREAKgeek on June 25, 2006, 06:27:06 PM
The stubborn ass Arthur Jones measured them in the early 70's in a cold, unflexed hang. They were a little under 20". So, pumped and flexed, they are probably well over 20" or the 22" he proported. And, who's to say that they didn't improve. Most say his best year was 1974.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 06:28:23 PM
I think Jones taped them wrong. Or taped them to tight. I can see 20 inches and some change cold but anything less is crap. Ive seen many 19 inch arms and they aint that big! He actually said a hair over 19 in his measurment. ok Arther ::)

But by 74 and 75 I think it is safe to say he was sporting legit 22's
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: danielson on June 25, 2006, 06:38:14 PM
If Hulks were over 24 in the 80's Arnolds were an easy 21 there.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 06:43:39 PM
I agree. Jones was full of shit. Arnold does not have a small head.The average head being what 22 inches?. His arms are clearly near or exceeding his head size. Over 20 for sure.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: legbreaker on June 25, 2006, 07:15:34 PM
If Arthur measured them hanging down and not flexed at his side then the flexed measurement easily could have been 2 inches bigger at 21 inches.  Arnolds arms were over 21 I believe.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 07:35:36 PM
I think it says he measured them flexed. I am almost positive but I could be wrong.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: alexxx on June 25, 2006, 07:46:49 PM
yeah he measured them flexed. and he measured them at 19 3/4" or 19 15/16th of an inch ::) besides Sergio at the time was training year round and Arnold wasn't.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 08:02:12 PM
yeah he measured them flexed. and he measured them at 19 3/4" or 19 15/16th of an inch ::) besides Sergio at the time was training year round and Arnold wasn't.

He prolly measured them dead offseason after Arnold had been out pounding sluts and drinking moonshine!
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: Bast175 on June 25, 2006, 08:03:08 PM
That picture is distorted dude.  His arms don't look that big in any other pictures.    Might just be the camera that took the picture?
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 08:05:15 PM
That picture is distorted dude.  His arms don't look that big in any other pictures.    Might just be the camera that took the picture?

I dont know. It is a screen shot from a movie. It was when he was younger so his back and chest were smaller? Maybe his arms where just massive and the rest off hime was catching up? I dunno.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: pumpster on June 25, 2006, 09:22:44 PM
In variosu pics beside Oliva they look about the same size as Oliva's. Oliva's arms were around 20.5" cold, close to 22" pumped. That's about what Schwarzenegger's were IMO. Everything else is just BS-shape, definition & taper make a big difference in perception.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: SulkingGreekGod on June 25, 2006, 09:29:10 PM
Yep, that picture's distorted. Here's the aspect-ratio-corrected version:
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 09:34:49 PM
They look bigger in the correct version. Still well over 20 inches there!
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: SulkingGreekGod on June 25, 2006, 09:42:12 PM
Keep in mind Arnold's weight fluctuated a lot (like all bodybuilders'). Also he was a lot bulkier in the early 70s than in 1975, which is how most people remember him. You can see the difference in these pics. In the offseason I can easily believe they were well over 20".
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: SulkingGreekGod on June 25, 2006, 09:44:54 PM
.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: SulkingGreekGod on June 25, 2006, 09:46:15 PM
more...
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on June 25, 2006, 09:55:49 PM
Keep in mind Arnold's weight fluctuated a lot (like all bodybuilders').


True, but most of the time his weight fluctuated down instead of up!
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 25, 2006, 11:05:17 PM
Arnie was awsome.


This imo is the perfect physique. 
Title: Okay, think about this for a minute.
Post by: NeoSeminole on June 25, 2006, 11:26:33 PM
In almost every pic you see of Arnold flexing, his arms look 20-21 inches right? It's safe to assume he's pumped up in the photos. So it's not farfetched to think his arms were 19.5 inches cold. My arms are 15.5 inches cold and I can pump them up a good inch after I work them out. If his arms were 21 inches cold, then he should be able to pump them up to 23 or 24 inches. Ronnie Coleman's arms measure that large, yet Arnold comes nowhere close to that. You also have to realize that Arnold had relatively weak triceps, forearms, and shoulders which created the illusion his biceps were much larger than they were.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: disco_stu on June 25, 2006, 11:53:59 PM
hey pass me some of that stuff you guys are smoking. those who cant see over 20 inch arms either have small arms or no concept of size.

arnold is 6 foot 2, right?

my own arms measured 19 inch cold, 20 inch pumped, at 6 foot 1...and they dont look like the mountains Arnold has.

Lee's arms, at 5 foot 4 (and a half) are over 20 inches...believe it.

also believe that Arnold's arms were over 22 and close to 23.

PS you dont pump up any more than about an inch and a half- it all depends on how big they are cold. It's about 5%.

later.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: the shadow on June 26, 2006, 01:21:04 AM
more...
wow arnold is looking huge...when were these pics taken...he is looking massive
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: Scimowser on June 26, 2006, 02:53:17 AM
show me someone else who has a bicep that springs out to that size? His tris were mediocre but his bis were enormous. That pic was taken from footage shot by Wag bennett i believe, you wanna see his calf development in the video. It is insane!. He shows his famous Preying Mantins pose amongst others.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: FreshMintBlue on June 26, 2006, 05:14:50 AM
who gives a shit how large his biceps are or were, bodybuilding is all about illusion, make your wast look smaller to make your back look bigger, who cares what some dillusional reporter says...arnold is and always will be my hero and a person I look up to.
And only from the fact that he showed EVERYBODY that you can come with empty hands and leave with pokets full of gold.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: Slick Vic on June 26, 2006, 05:22:19 AM
The stubborn ass Arthur Jones measured them in the early 70's in a cold, unflexed hang. They were a little under 20". So, pumped and flexed, they are probably well over 20" or the 22" he proported. And, who's to say that they didn't improve. Most say his best year was 1974.
I remember that story. He (Arthur) stated that Sergio's arm was the ONLY ONE that spoke it's TRUE measure of being 21'', if not more. I read the story how Arnold and Franco heard that Arthur Jones waits at the airport terminal when bodybuilders arrive to get their true measurements and upon hearing about this Arnold and Franco pumped their arms on the plane on their way to Florida.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: FreshMintBlue on June 26, 2006, 05:29:07 AM
and upon hearing about this Arnold and Franco pumped their arms on the plane on their way to Florida.
The mental picture of Arnold and Franco furiously pumping their biceps in an airplane kills me right now  ;D

Stewardes we NEEED MORE WEIGHT...god damit....more weight!!!!!!
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: Lord Humungous on June 26, 2006, 07:01:01 AM
Arnie had some mega uneven arms. His right arm had a huge egg shaped peak while his left was kinda flat compaired to the right. ALL of his one arm shots are done with his right arm and his double bi shots are usally slightly twisted to hided the difference. From the back though it doesnt really show up to much
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: alexxx on June 26, 2006, 07:08:58 AM
The mental picture of Arnold and Franco furiously pumping their biceps in an airplane kills me right now  ;D

Stewardes we NEEED MORE WEIGHT...god damit....more weight!!!!!!

LOL!!!
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: jaejonna on June 26, 2006, 07:14:01 AM
Those pics of Arnold in light blue trunks were when he was at his heaviest and freakiest!!! He must of been around 250!!!

Here is his most muscular from that shoot. Posted many times before...
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: dr.chimps on June 26, 2006, 07:20:16 AM
Holy smoking gun, Batman. Is that our own True Adonis standing between Arnold and Dave D?  ;D
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: alexxx on June 26, 2006, 07:25:47 AM
 :o
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 26, 2006, 07:29:16 AM
Those pics of Arnold in light blue trunks were when he was at his heaviest and freakiest!!! He must of been around 250!!!

Here is his most muscular from that shoot. Posted many times before...


His chest is absolutely ridiculous! I cannot believe how thick it is in that shot!
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: brianX on June 26, 2006, 11:59:49 AM
The first photo is definitely morphed. I've seen photos from the same video, and while impressive, his arms didn't look anywhere near that big.

I don't think anyone except Sergio and maybe Larry Scott had 20" arms in the 60's and 70's. A true 20" arm is a freakishly HUGE arm. To put things in perspective, Gunter's arms were recently taped at 22", and he weighs over 300 lb in contest shape. Someone on Getbig measured Lee Priest's arms at a little over 20", and many people say he has the freakiest arms ever.

I'd like to know what you guys are doing to pump your arms up. My arms don't gain much over a quarter inch when pumping up.
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: Scimowser on June 26, 2006, 12:09:22 PM
Those pics of Arnold in light blue trunks were when he was at his heaviest and freakiest!!! He must of been around 250!!!

Here is his most muscular from that shoot. Posted many times before...

i hope youre not referrnig to the first pic in the thread because youre chatting shit if you are. The 2 pics are years apart as you can tell from his features, hell even his hair is different. As i said it was filmed by Wag Bennett and his wife when he lived with them in England in the 60's
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 26, 2006, 12:24:28 PM
The first photo is definitely morphed. I've seen photos from the same video, and while impressive, his arms didn't look anywhere near that big.

I don't think anyone except Sergio and maybe Larry Scott had 20" arms in the 60's and 70's. A true 20" arm is a freakishly HUGE arm. To put things in perspective, Gunter's arms were recently taped at 22", and he weighs over 300 lb in contest shape. Someone on Getbig measured Lee Priest's arms at a little over 20", and many people say he has the freakiest arms ever.

I'd like to know what you guys are doing to pump your arms up. My arms don't gain much over a quarter inch when pumping up.


The point of this thread was to say that if his arms were that huge in the 60's you better believe they were over 20 in the mid seventies. My friend and one time training partner was a top ten guy at the 2001 nationals. He was a super heavy. 240 lbs contest. His arms where a shade under 20 inches and couldent hold a candle to Arnolds. Ive seen a few trully 20 inch arms in my life. Those arms on Arnie are far better and more massive. My guess would be Arnolds arms at there most massive were just shade under 21 inches cold. 20.75" cold. Almost 22" pumped.

Here is the corrected picture.
Title: Re: Okay, think about this for a minute.
Post by: Ursus on June 26, 2006, 01:10:57 PM
In almost every pic you see of Arnold flexing, his arms look 20-21 inches right? It's safe to assume he's pumped up in the photos. So it's not farfetched to think his arms were 19.5 inches cold. My arms are 15.5 inches cold and I can pump them up a good inch after I work them out. If his arms were 21 inches cold, then he should be able to pump them up to 23 or 24 inches. Ronnie Coleman's arms measure that large, yet Arnold comes nowhere close to that. You also have to realize that Arnold had relatively weak triceps, forearms, and shoulders which created the illusion his biceps were much larger than they were.

mine are a little over 18" pumped at at an inch or 2 taller are no where near as impressive at all.  dont forget 20" hangin by side. mine are over 18" pumped flexed. i well believe he had over 20#" flexed
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: gracie bjj on June 26, 2006, 01:15:49 PM
arnolds arms were way over 20 inches,my arms aint shit next to arnolds and mine measured almost 19 inches the other day after i worked out and mine look small next to his
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: HUGEPECS on June 26, 2006, 02:03:50 PM
SHIT, ARNIE'S ARMS WERE NOT UNDER 20 INCH. YA'LL DO SOME RESEARCH
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: body88 on June 26, 2006, 02:08:46 PM
SHIT, ARNIE'S ARMS WERE NOT UNDER 20 INCH. YA'LL DO SOME RESEARCH

Well if you did some research you would see Arther Jones taped his arm at supposedly under 20 inches hence the reason this thread was started. To call bullshit on that claim



You knew that already tho ;)
Title: Re: Anyone who said Arnolds arms were less than 20 inches is full of sh*t!
Post by: pumpster on June 26, 2006, 02:29:42 PM
Amazing the life of threads on this; the magazine hype really sets in after a while.

A 20.5" cold arm that is cut is huge on anyone around 6' or under.