Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: quadzilla456 on July 26, 2006, 05:26:28 PM
-
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/bigbeachsm.jpg)
-
please tell me that pic is morphed,i dont think even the great ron is that gigantic
-
no no no, ronnie has small calves..and traps :)
-
please tell me that pic is morphed,i dont think even the great ron is that gigantic
Found it on his web site - the link is straight from there. This just goes to show how massive he is. There are a few more pics that are just as impressive! He must be huge in person. I was at the Arnold Classic in 2002 but forgot to stop at his booth. Sorry Ron.
-
please tell me that pic is morphed,i dont think even the great ron is that gigantic
Pic isn't morphed.
-
That's from Jay Leno show. I watched that.
-
Morphed.
-
when he diets down his calves are puny!
-
no no no, ronnie has small calves..and traps :)
1997 lol
-
1997 lol
What's the point in posting a 9-year old pic of his calves?
-
wow is all i can say if that pic aint morphed,he looks like a superhero come to life from a comic book,hes the man
-
wow is all i can say if that pic aint morphed,he looks like a superhero come to life from a comic book
Fatman, The Blimped Crusader?
-
What's the point in posting a 9-year old pic of his calves?
The point is his calves look very suspect thats 1997 for christs-sake he was a pro for 5 years already .
-
That's from Jay Leno show. I watched that.
Jay's very own John Melendez. Funny that Ronnie was the one who actually got "sand in his face". :D
-
i saw that too. it was like watching a hippo on its hind legs chasing hippo-pussy. awesomeness.
-
The point is his calves look very suspect thats 1997 for christs-sake he was a pro for 5 years already .
Please, in 1997 was at the most 250 pounds, in that 2005 picture is 320. I guess 70 pounds is a negligible detail...
Wait a minute, according to your reasoning also his quads are suspect right?
-
Please, in 1997 was at the most 250 pounds, in that 2005 picture is 320. I guess 70 pounds is a negligible detail...
Wait a minute, according to your reasoning also his quads are suspect right?
He was 255lbs in 1997 and sure he's going to get more size with more weight but you look at his calves from 96/97 to 99/00 they're noticalable bigger despite not being much heavier and quads have always been one of Ronnies strong points calves haven't.
-
Well compare the pictures of his Mr. O. debut then with 97... in 94 they were even smaller. If you ask me I don't see an astonishing improvement from 97 to 99, he brought them up a little bit, but he did so constantly over time. Even nowadays his calves are not that great, maybe 2 inches more than in 97 but again, he gained weight and maybe trained them harder.
The 2005 picture above is distorted, so don't be fooled.
-
Ok ND, I agree about the calves. However, holy sh_t. You have the scanner and the inate knowledge of these things. Is that a real pic. 240, you seem to be a photoshop expert; is that reality or fiction. If that is a real pic, the man is beyond huge. :o
-
the sand only chose to get blurry in the areas where ronnie had superhuman proportions. Check out those anklebones!
-
anyone who says ronnie's calves are "suspect" is just taking shots at him.
there has never been any evidence of this.
eg. 1997:
(http://body.builder.hu/imagebank/pictures/991158189.jpg)
2003:
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/coleman/rc193.jpg)
THEY LOOK THE SAME!!! ::) ::) ::) (exept they are obviously larger)
Also note: you can take a 1995 shot from the front and his calves disappear:
(http://digilander.libero.it/mikementzer/Coleman16.jpg)
BUT GUESS WHAT:
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo1.jpg)
the same thing happens when he is 50 pounds heavier!
anyone with a brain can clearly see that ronnie's calves have not changed over the years. They always suck from most angles.
And there is no evidence to support them being fake other than bias.
Ronnie's calves have certainly grown, but they have always sucked in relation to his quads.
-
Ronnie could chop off his legs at the knee and it would matter. He'd still crush everyone!
-
you two schmoes will post in any thread that reads "Ronnie Coleman..."
-
you two schmoes will post in any thread that reads "Ronnie Coleman..."
The terms "schmoe" makes grown men cry into pink hankerchiefs.
Do you really want that on your conscience?
-
only a schmoe would say ronnie has suspect calves with only hate to support it.
-
that beach pic is touched up.
-
pic in orginal topic:
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/bigbeachsm.jpg)
pic from Matt's site:
(http://media.bodybuildingpro.com/ronnie-coleman-jay-leno-june-23-2005/21.jpg)
yes, its touched up - a little bit.
-
The terms "schmoe" makes grown men cry into pink hankerchiefs.
Do you really want that on your conscience?
ive been quiet lately, it's not the thread that bothers me.. it's the fact they have been doing this for almost 300 pages and there still at the starting line.
-
only a schmoe would say ronnie has suspect calves with only hate to support it.
for sure..i think that photo is morphed, but accusations of ronnie using 'something' on his calves are just ridiculous...One day he has the worst calves in the bbing world, next day the guy uses synthol or something like it???
monster discrepancies...
-
for sure..i think that photo is morphed, but accusations of ronnie using 'something' on his calves are just ridiculous...One day he has the worst calves in the bbing world, next day the guy uses synthol or something like it???
monster discrepancies...
Thank you.
This mode of accusation is actually only limited to a very small and bitter section of the membership on this site.
Its a pathetic stab.
-
What's the point in posting a 9-year old pic of his calves?
Indeed, when he was born he probably had small calves too ::)
-
that pic is not morphed. didn't you guys see the show. Ronnie is a fcuking beast
-
1997 -1999 noticable size difference after being a pro for 5 their flat as a board and then in just 2 years all the sudden they respond? come on ::) and you ever notice he doesn't have any development of the gastrocnimeus they always appear smooth ??? I mean Shawn Ray & Chris Cormier both have high calves but both have development I'm not saying he has stuff in his calves but as Shawn Ray would say things that make you go hmmmmmmmmm .
-
only a schmoe would say ronnie has suspect calves with only hate to support it.
hey your right..cuz the other day i was watching ronnies 'the unbelieveable',when coleman goes for his police work,he is wearing shorts.. and damn his calves look giantic..his calves r just huge.. the thing is that his calves lack shape and thats it..but other than that they r just huge..they measure 20 plus inches