Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: 8 INCH not biceps on August 09, 2006, 02:12:35 PM

Title: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on August 09, 2006, 02:12:35 PM

 If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2006, 02:13:49 PM
girls dont like bodybuilders. get a reality check.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: The True Adonis on August 09, 2006, 02:14:11 PM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

You must be fat and delusional and never have dieted enough to see abs.

Anyone can eat a shit load of food and go lift weights.  
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on August 09, 2006, 02:18:22 PM
You must be fat and delusional and never have dieted enough to see abs.

Anyone can eat a shit load of food and go lift weights.  



 All i am saying it what is really important is to have big arms, chest etc because nobody is going to see your six pack unless you walk around naked all day. And by the way i am bulking and you can still see my four pack but the lower abs are not visible.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: gordiano on August 09, 2006, 02:21:34 PM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

Not really. Bret amazes us with his size, and size alone. But you can bet that if this GYM giant decided to get "ripped" and hit the stage, it would be lights out for the competition.


Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2006, 02:21:45 PM
actually big arms and chest isnt important either. unless you're fabio. are you fabio?
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Slick Vic on August 09, 2006, 02:22:01 PM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.
Is this your excuse for not having abs?
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: jarhead on August 09, 2006, 02:22:26 PM
i think it is relevant.  importance is subjective.  don't you want to show the lady that you are with a nice set of abs once you get that shirt off.  six packs don't matter if you want to attract guys (excluding Bay, Tim Fogerty, etc.)  but you aren't doing that.  so hit the cardio.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: The True Adonis on August 09, 2006, 02:23:21 PM


 All i am saying it what is really important is to have big arms, chest etc because nobody is going to see your six pack unless you walk around naked all day. And by the way i am bulking and you can still see my four pack but the lower abs are not visible.
::)

Thats what they all say.. "You can still see my four-pack the bottom are not visible."

Total bullshit.  You are fat just like everyone else who says that.  Its ok to admit it.  We all get fat sometimes.  

Your arms and everything will actually look way bigger and more impressive to everyone when you are really lean in a shirt.  In a long sleeved prefectly tailored shirt its even better. You know you are lean enough when every shirt you own needs to be altered. :)
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2006, 02:24:02 PM
 :-\
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: The Showstoppa on August 09, 2006, 02:24:13 PM
It might not be necessary, but it's needed for me to finish the 12 pack.  ;D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Captain Equipoise on August 09, 2006, 02:54:49 PM
Hey, if Ronnie can win 8 Olympia's without one, then we don't need one either!
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Deadpool on August 09, 2006, 02:56:33 PM
The six pack looks absolutely amazing on anyone.  Check out Brad Pitt, I watched fight club four times because he looks amazing with it and those pronounced obliques
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Slick Vic on August 09, 2006, 03:03:19 PM
Hey, if Ronnie can win 8 Olympia's without one, then we don't need one either!

Doh!  :D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: THEBERG on August 09, 2006, 03:04:51 PM
Brad was in very tight condition and it's amazing to see but he hardly had any muscle
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bluto on August 09, 2006, 03:05:36 PM
most with 6 pacs doesnt
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Deadpool on August 09, 2006, 03:07:55 PM
he looks like a bruce lee, a thin and lightly muscled but amazingly detailed

I love the six pack, but have only seen one in person

ps ask me about the most painful ab equiptment on the market... :P
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Mr.Hutch on August 09, 2006, 03:10:33 PM
you dont need anything, arms, chest, abs, nothing...YOu can be as big as you want just depends on how many sweaters you wanna wear to the gym...
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Man of Steel on August 09, 2006, 03:12:57 PM
It might not be necessary, but it's needed for me to finish the 12 pack.  ;D

AHAHAAH!!  Exactly
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Man of Steel on August 09, 2006, 03:14:06 PM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

The ladies never care about my stomach once they see the thick and heavy hangin death swingin between my thighs.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bast000 on August 09, 2006, 03:15:04 PM
If your stomach is fat than everything else is fat too.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Rami on August 09, 2006, 03:15:19 PM
You must be fat and delusional and never have dieted enough to see abs.

Anyone can eat a shit load of food and go lift weights. 
How fucking true!! Being natural while dieting and training hard is a WHOLE different game all together than just lifting. Separates the men from the boys.


It is well worth it though, if you stick with it you will be amazed at how your physique can look, especially the first time. When I do it, it's like a quest I set out to do, it is with you 24/7. It's very real and there is no half ass way of doing it when natural. You need to enjoy it, else it is not worth and it ain't your thing, you need to really like give it your all in the gym and be strict with your diet plans etc.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: shiftedShapes on August 09, 2006, 03:21:17 PM
there is absolutely no reason to bulk if you are a natural

you can maintain and build strength at sub 10% BF very easily, and getting fat is really not going to speed up your muscle growth.

All it does is give you a false sense of accomplishment watching your weight rise, not realizing that all your doing is adding lard.  If you like to eat go join a lil' debbie message board and gab with all of the other fat bitches who numb their depression with gallons of icecream and krispee kream donuts.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: 8 INCH not biceps on August 09, 2006, 03:24:00 PM

 I have a buddy who has a ripped six pack and the thing is when he is fully clothed nobody looks at him while i get a lot of stares.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: danielson on August 09, 2006, 03:24:16 PM
Brad was in very tight condition and it's amazing to see but he hardly had any muscle


yet any girl in the world would choose him over a bodybuilder.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: The Showstoppa on August 09, 2006, 03:29:45 PM

yet any girl in the world would choose him over a bodybuilder.

Not any.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: danielson on August 09, 2006, 03:31:28 PM
Not any.


can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: danielson on August 09, 2006, 03:35:35 PM
Yep, I know of about 3 at my gym.  We had this very discussion.  They thought Pitt looked like a fag.

maybe, but they are the extreme exception and you know it.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: davidpaul on August 09, 2006, 04:06:14 PM
Not really. Bret amazes us with his size, and size alone. But you can bet that if this GYM giant decided to get "ripped" and hit the stage, it would be lights out for the competition.





your holding a lot of size there bro, you should start cutting up though.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: what. on August 09, 2006, 04:27:45 PM
Some people can only naturally attain a 4 pack.  Some people have thin linea-alba's.  Some lucky bastards have an 8 pack.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: The Freakshow on August 09, 2006, 04:32:13 PM
YEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!

Get a six pack or go home!

This bodybuilding son. It's all about presentation ;D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on August 09, 2006, 05:53:33 PM

can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?


.... i would....


but i'm insane, we all know this....  :-\
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: nycbull on August 09, 2006, 05:56:31 PM
nahh...six packs went out with Marky Mark and his Calvin Klein Underwear ads.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Praetor Fenix on August 09, 2006, 06:02:21 PM
yet any girl in the world would choose him over a bodybuilder.

Due to $$$, power, fame, prestige, etc - i.e. nothing to do with physical appearance.

If Chris Cook was a prolific Hollywood personality he would effortlessly surpass Brad Pitt.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: danielson on August 09, 2006, 06:04:32 PM
Due to $$$, power, fame, prestige, etc - i.e. nothing to do with physical appearance.

If Chris Cook was a prolific Hollywood personality he would effortlessly surpass Brad Pitt.

Dane Cook would pull more ass than Chris Cook, he already fucked Jess Simpson and he's pudgy. And you are delusional if you think women like meatheads.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Praetor Fenix on August 09, 2006, 06:09:38 PM
I have a buddy who has a ripped six pack and the thing is when he is fully clothed nobody looks at him while i get a lot of stares.

Attention does not necessarily indicate attraction.
Most people will take note of a muscular guy. Its fairly conspicuous.
The same way most people will readily notice a morbidly obese man enter the setting.

In my "prime", I got quite a bit of attention too due to my size, namely in the form of stupid questions and comments. However, I learned the hard way that this momentary curiosity rarely manifested itself into any real interest beyond the momentary awe.

As long as the guy isn't excessively skinny or overweight, too many other variables of greater importance are involved. The muscle turns out to be nothing more than an indifferent accessory.

Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Praetor Fenix on August 09, 2006, 06:13:57 PM
Dane Cook would pull more ass than Chris Cook, he already fucked Jess Simpson and he's pudgy. And you are delusional if you think women like meatheads.

You only presented another example of a mainstream media celebrity...
My point was, the $$$ and status are the primary variables, not the physical package.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: danielson on August 09, 2006, 06:16:17 PM
You only presented another example of a mainstream media celebrity...
My point was, the $$$ and status are the primary variables, not the physical package.

I agree with your prior post though. There are way too many variables. But Chicks in general don't like meatheads.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Earl1972 on August 09, 2006, 09:26:20 PM
all you guys saying chicks don't like bodybuilders must be skinny or fat

maybe the pros aren't the ideal for most but almost hot chicks like muscular guys

E
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Croatch on August 09, 2006, 09:55:28 PM
Quote
girls dont like bodybuilders. get a reality check.
Agreed.  Aside from fitness girls, most girls could care less.  Especially in a city like New York.  When I lived there in 99', I never saw so many hot girls with scrawned out Eurotrash looking guys.  Being jacked really doesn't matter, only to the person who's lifting and maybe other guys in the gym. 
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: body88 on August 09, 2006, 09:59:57 PM
Due to $$$, power, fame, prestige, etc - i.e. nothing to do with physical appearance.

If Chris Cook was a prolific Hollywood personality he would effortlessly surpass Brad Pitt.

Stop it.....


Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: airrick on August 09, 2006, 11:27:42 PM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

ask girls what they like.. easy as that!

most girls will prolly say arms, and some will say abs... ima have to say abs.. chicks dig abs (aint talkin bout bob either!) lol!
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: younggunz on August 09, 2006, 11:48:35 PM
i don't kno what you guys are talking about? i get plenty of attention from girls they love big arm's and chest, Ive had a number of incidences where i have hooked up w/ girls and it all started with a girl commenting on my body. Ive noticed it gives girl's an easy way to brake the ice. unless ur all ugly bastards
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Rome on August 10, 2006, 04:11:36 AM
girls dont like bodybuilders. get a reality check.
O.K I checked. WRONG!! When I was single most of the girls I fucked  were curious to see "what all those muscles could do in bed."  I never disappointed  ;D
what women SAY they like and what they REALLY like can be 2 different things. You'll learn that as soon as you start dating
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: bmacsys on August 10, 2006, 06:16:22 AM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

Monster excuse for being fat. Anyway, have you ever actually had a girl?
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: bmacsys on August 10, 2006, 06:18:41 AM
Check out Brad Pitt, I watched fight club four times because he looks amazing with it and those pronounced obliques

Thats scary.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: bmacsys on August 10, 2006, 06:20:46 AM
while i get a lot of stares.

Because you are so weird looking? You claimed to be the strongest guy pound for pound on Getbig a while back didn't you?
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: bmacsys on August 10, 2006, 06:22:37 AM

can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?

Thats an extreme example. Try using a natural bodybuilder like Steve Reeves. I bet he had his share off ass and more.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: HUGEPECS on August 10, 2006, 06:25:39 AM

can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?




No, the majority of women would go for the Brad Pitt package. These are the bitches who would give you a million worthless reasons why they want the brad pitt look. These Whores, love the f. aggot look over a well built muscle machine like Jay Cutler. Who cares, Most of these Nymphos are clueless about bodybuilding
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: wood on August 10, 2006, 06:27:21 AM
there is absolutely no reason to bulk if you are a natural

you can maintain and build strength at sub 10% BF very easily, and getting fat is really not going to speed up your muscle growth.

All it does is give you a false sense of accomplishment watching your weight rise, not realizing that all your doing is adding lard.  If you like to eat go join a lil' debbie message board and gab with all of the other fat bitches who numb their depression with gallons of icecream and krispee kream donuts.

got a link? ;D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: shiftedShapes on August 10, 2006, 06:43:22 AM
got a link? ;D

im not going to enable you
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: buffbodz on August 10, 2006, 06:47:05 AM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

You're not training of dieting hard enough.  To be a complete bodybuilder, you must have visible abbs, calves, back, hams. everything comes with correct dieting and training
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Earl1972 on August 10, 2006, 12:42:58 PM
ask girls what they like.. easy as that!

most girls will prolly say arms, and some will say abs... ima have to say abs.. chicks dig abs (aint talkin bout bob either!) lol!

most of the polls i've seen said shoulders were the sexiest muscle, probably because good shoulders are visible no matter what you are wearing and they represent power and being a good protecter

E
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: wood on August 10, 2006, 12:46:15 PM
im not going to enable you

ok, i'll just check with candidate, i'm sure he's got it saved to his favorites ;D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: bmacsys on August 10, 2006, 03:16:53 PM
Yes, when you wanna catch a little buzz. ;)
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bast000 on August 10, 2006, 03:20:24 PM
I saw on a site that Brad Pitt benches 225 for 8.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Ex Coelis on August 10, 2006, 03:22:03 PM
six packs are for fags - real men have kegs

(http://www.btinternet.com/~philip.j.wright/glenrosspage_files/image026.jpg)

(http://www.btinternet.com/~philip.j.wright/glenrosspage_files/image014.jpg)
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: gordiano on August 10, 2006, 04:24:28 PM
most of the polls i've seen said shoulders were the sexiest muscle, probably because good shoulders are visible no matter what you are wearing and they represent power and being a good protecter

E

Yeah, but you know how those polls are. The women don't really answer them truthfully. They always give the token answers, like I want a man that is:

1) Funny

2) Honest

et cetera. Yet, in real life, they want a guy that treats them like shit, a HUGE house, the biggest diamond on earth and lots of money. Of course, there are exceptions.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Captain Equipoise on August 10, 2006, 06:32:00 PM
Let's be completely honest, most women would not go for someone like 'Jay' or 'Ronnie' but I think ideally most women would want a guy that looks like Frank Sepe..From girls I've talked to, this is the ideal look that 99% of girls go crazy for, a good amount of lean muscle but not too 'monstrous' or 'freaky' looking.

(http://www.bodybuilders.com/sepe11.jpg)
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: FREAKgeek on August 10, 2006, 06:50:43 PM
EQ, that was gayer than Bon Jovi's hairdryer.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Captain Equipoise on August 10, 2006, 07:18:07 PM
EQ, that was gayer than Bon Jovi's hairdryer.

Ask any girl in the world dude, that's the female's dream guy right there. Just enough muscle, but not to the point where it's freakish.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Sir William Idol on August 10, 2006, 08:01:04 PM
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

girls at the bar bluntly ask to see my six pack all the time


Sir William "look but if you wanna touch it then you gotta pay" Idol
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: shiftedShapes on August 10, 2006, 11:57:02 PM
ok, i'll just check with candidate, i'm sure he's got it saved to his favorites ;D

actually he's the admin over on the lil' debbie boards, pm him for mod status.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: figgs on August 11, 2006, 12:35:21 AM
Agreed.  Aside from fitness girls, most girls could care less.  Especially in a city like New York.  When I lived there in 99', I never saw so many hot girls with scrawned out Eurotrash looking guys.  Being jacked really doesn't matter, only to the person who's lifting and maybe other guys in the gym. 

I disagree. I'm from NY and most girls love my muscles. I have had the pleasure of once hearing a girl sitting behind me in class comment as to how disgustingly huge my back was. After hearing that I just sat there grinning and felt over-flattered.  ;D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: TheGoldenPrince on August 11, 2006, 06:05:27 AM
Why get a sixpack when you have wheels like these? ;D
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bast000 on August 11, 2006, 07:51:54 AM


These Whores, love the f. aggot look over a well built muscle machine like Jay Cutler.

maybe they don't like guys with 42" diameter heads.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: Bast000 on August 11, 2006, 07:52:31 AM
Why get a sixpack when you have wheels like these? ;D

he has a six pack too.  if he didn't his legs would be smooth.
Title: Re: Is a six pack really necessary
Post by: shiftedShapes on August 11, 2006, 08:26:07 AM
maybe they don't like guys with 42" diameter heads.

that is an instinct.  Women who lacked it were more likely to die in childbirth.

Brutal Evolution