Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Bast175 on August 27, 2006, 11:46:29 AM

Title: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Bast175 on August 27, 2006, 11:46:29 AM
Nevertrustablonde brought up a good point that there aren't enough Kamali threads on getbig so I made another one.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: titusisback on August 27, 2006, 11:49:00 AM
Let's just say he's "bigger", if that's what he's been trying to do.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Stavios on August 27, 2006, 11:59:43 AM
just how the fuck did Kamali placed ahead of Chick at the 1999 nationals  ???

(http://www.repetrope.com/assets/content/Media01/galleries/12009/fullsize/12009-cicherello02.jpg)
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on August 27, 2006, 12:02:26 PM
Nevertrustablonde brought up a good point that there aren't enough Kamali threads on getbig so I made another one.

 ::)
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: haider on August 27, 2006, 12:02:48 PM
Man, if Chick got hsi shit together he would place very well.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Dorian 01 on August 27, 2006, 12:03:52 PM
Those damned powerlifting movements made his arms shrink and look full of muscle tears.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Stavios on August 27, 2006, 12:04:52 PM
Man, if Chick got hsi shit together he would place very well.


very true haider
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Yorkie T on August 27, 2006, 12:08:34 PM
just how the f**k did Kamali placed ahead of Chick at the 1999 nationals  ???

(http://www.repetrope.com/assets/content/Media01/galleries/12009/fullsize/12009-cicherello02.jpg)
chick looks good there,kamali shouldnt even be a pro
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: gibberj2 on August 27, 2006, 12:12:21 PM
awesome latspread
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: brianX on August 27, 2006, 12:19:58 PM
Chick's lats look ridiculously huge in that photo.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Havenbull on August 27, 2006, 12:23:25 PM
I'm not kissing ass or anything, but I always thought Chick late '90's was sort of underrated
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: gibberj2 on August 27, 2006, 12:24:29 PM
how come Bob placed 2nd in the 2002 NOC and 16th or something in the O that year? What place was it again?
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: gordiano on August 27, 2006, 12:25:09 PM
Finally King gets placed where he deserves as opposed to where name recognition got him.  Top six at the NY Pro show?  Give me a break!  Meanwhile Frank McGrath placed 12th at a show of a similar caliber, the 2004 Toronto Pro.  I think the judges may have read these boards and came to their senses.

The judges can read?   ???
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Hedgehog on August 27, 2006, 01:00:39 PM
just how the f**k did Kamali placed ahead of Chick at the 1999 nationals  ???

(http://www.repetrope.com/assets/content/Media01/galleries/12009/fullsize/12009-cicherello02.jpg)

Kamali must have been real good friends with them judges.


He never should've been a pro to begin with.

Time to stop believing the hype.

YIP
Zack
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: bigmikecox on August 27, 2006, 01:14:15 PM
GH in moderation can do wonders for the body. 

His waist and head got huge!!!
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: sarcasm on August 27, 2006, 01:15:52 PM
Nevertrustablonde brought up a good point that there aren't enough Kamali threads on getbig so I made another one.
are you suggesting that "nevertrustablonde" enjoys a good doggie style pounding from time to time, Bast?
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Has Beens on August 27, 2006, 01:20:03 PM
I have to give credit to Chick in that shot.....very impressive !
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Sculpter on August 27, 2006, 01:44:11 PM
Those '99 & '06 pics are eye opening.Looking at them you can see how his body has actually gotten worse throughout the years.His arm size is actually the only thing that hasn't changed for better or worse!
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: gibberj2 on August 27, 2006, 02:14:18 PM
In my opinion Bob has always had a better physique than Kamali.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Hedgehog on August 27, 2006, 02:27:57 PM
I think it may still be possible for King to improve.  Bertil didn't look so great at the 1987 Mr. Olympia but improved for some of the 1989 shows.  It is possible!

I agree. But he would need a big layoff, and perhaps aim for the spring shows in 2008.

Let his body heal up, let the gut and the obliques come down in size as much as possible. Then stay the fcuk away from the heavy stuff.

YIP
Zack
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Farcry on August 27, 2006, 02:31:39 PM
King should take the rest of this year off and 2007, train naturally for a while, then comeback in 2008
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: WiseGuy on August 27, 2006, 04:30:22 PM
King should take the rest of this year off and 2007, train naturally for a while, then comeback in 2008


I agree he really needs to start over.....
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: WiseGuy on August 27, 2006, 04:32:03 PM
I think it may still be possible for King to improve.  Bertil didn't look so great at the 1987 Mr. Olympia but improved for some of the 1989 shows.  It is possible!


at this point king needs:


(http://www.iaswcd.org/Images/easy-button.jpg)
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: pobrecito on August 27, 2006, 04:34:24 PM
Well, this is nothing new. Damn near EVERY pro has regressed their physique since winning their pro card. See, back when they were amateurs they were the genetic elite and could play their own game and look their best. But now, they are no longer the genetic elite (i.e. Coleman) and are forced to play his game and ruin their look :-\
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: jmt1 on August 27, 2006, 04:38:08 PM
let me fix that pic of chic....



there much better.
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Parker on August 27, 2006, 04:42:28 PM
Kamali must have been real good friends with them judges.

In an artilce in Flex mag, he publicly thanked a female judge for helping him get his pro card. I believe it was that judge that died ( I think), the one that said Shawn Ray comes into the Olympia the same each year
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: Palpatine Q on August 27, 2006, 04:44:32 PM

I agree he really needs to start over.....

Me too. he should just lay off everything for a good year and let his body chemistry return to normal. He'd probably respond good again to the shit.
Title: If only his calves grew like his gut
Post by: George Stinky Bush on August 27, 2006, 04:48:26 PM
Kamali must have been real good friends with them judges.


He never should've been a pro to begin with.

Time to stop believing the hype.

YIP
Zack

Jealous hater. If Kamali took off 30 inches off his gut he would unstoppable!
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: the choad on August 27, 2006, 06:17:16 PM
kamali's androgen recepters must be shot by now..You could tell from his pictures he started juice like at the age of 15...Noww his body just stopped repsonding to the juice....Let's not even get into his abuse of SLIN/IGF1/GH..
Title: Re: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons
Post by: the shadow on August 28, 2006, 07:13:13 AM
everything on king kamali got smaller in one case and bigger in the other case..all that really gained size on king is in his gut..his gut looks thrice the size from 1999and the rest of him keeps getting smaller..