Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: jaejonna on September 20, 2006, 07:44:21 PM
-
Who here has been tested for AIDS?
Who has been exhibiting dangerous sexual behaviour conductive to the spread of HIV?
If you havent taken the test, why not? Would you rather live not knowing because knowing that you had it you would lose the will to live? I was scared like that but I finnally had it checked out and found out that I was CLEAN of everything and its crazy cause I never wanted to take a test cause I thought I that I jumped out the plane with out a parachute one too many times. You never know.
Get Tested!!!
-
Who here has been tested for AIDS?
Who has been exhibiting dangerous sexual behaviour conductive to the spread of HIV?
If you havent taken the test, why not? Would you rather live not knowing because knowing that you had it you would lose the will to live? I was scared like that but I finnally had it checked out and found out that I was CLEAN of everything and its crazy cause I never wanted to take a test cause I thought I that I jumped out the plane with out a parachute one too many times. You never know.
Get Tested!!!
damn weird you posted this. Just got my negative results back today.The wait suckssssssss. Def gonna be safe as hell from now on. how many chicks u reckon you banged raw dog?
-
got tested they swabbed my mouth and told me in 20 mins I am clean.
-
I hadn't been tested in quite a while, but when my woman got tested for being pregnant, they ran everything. I'm clean as a whistle. I guess that means i didn't tag enough skanks before settling down, eh?
-
damn weird you posted this. Just got my negative results back today.The wait suckssssssss. Def gonna be safe as hell from now on. how many chicks u reckon you banged raw dog?
enough to think I should worry
-
enough to think I should worry
That shits scary right? Then they tell you its only conclusive if has been 3 months since the last possible encounter. I got tested 3 months ago and was clean. Then had to wait another 3 which I got back today. Thankfully clean also. Sucks how the best things in life can always do you the most harm. Figures the most pleasurable activity can also cost you your life >:(
-
got tested they swabbed my mouth and told me in 20 mins I am clean.
They could of but since the were taking urine and blood samples for other stds too....nothing !! nada, zip zero...I could never went with pigs or hot whores. I was stingy growing up but end of hs into 7 years of school you meet alot of nice people.
-
That shits scary right? Then they tell you its only conclusive if has been 3 months since the last possible encounter. I got tested 3 months ago and was clean. Then had to wait another 3 which I got back today. Thankfully clean also. Sucks how the best things in life can always do you the most harm.
I dont talk about my personal ish like this but its been more than 3 mon.
-
I dont talk about my personal ish like this but its been more than 3 mon.
Thats fine. I was saying how when I was tested the first time and clean they then informed me it was only 100 percent accurate 3 months after the encounter. I then had to wait 3 more months in which I thought about all the dumb shit I have done and worried. Didnt mean to refer to your siuation. Anyway I was pumped to be "clean" today. No more whores for me!
-
Several years ago I read "Black Lies, White Lies: The Truth According to Tony Brown." Part of his book argues that AIDs is not a heterosexual disease. Very, very interesting. He said, based on some evidence, that blood transfusions, intravenous drug use, and third world health conditions are the primary ways the disease is spread. The disease became rampant in the gay community, according to Brown, because of the sexual practices of many gays was so indiscriminate and random, involving multiple partners, etc. that they wound up contracting numerous STDs, which greatly impacted their immune system. He cited and quoted a gay guy who frequented the bath houses in SF and this guy had like ten different STDs and other illnesses related to his sexual practices.
If I recall correctly, he said you really can't find cases where a heterosexual contracts the disease through normal sex with another heterosexual. And that when those cases do arise, one of the partners got it from someone who fits the profile (blood transfusions, intravenous drug use, third world health/sex conditions).
I balked when I first read his theory, but after reading the entire section and thinking about it, I think it makes sense. Can't find the book, but I'm going to buy it again and try and quote the passages I read if this thread hangs around long enough.
-
I heard just today that smokers are far more vulnerable to the virus than non smokers
btw
it is virtually impossible for a man to contract hiv from a woman during intercourse
-
it is virtually impossible for a man to contract hiv from a woman during intercourse
anal or vaginal? I heard somewhere that anal is way easier to catch. Maybe it's jsut for the women's side tho.
-
anal makes the spread of disease muuuuch easier because there is more tearing of skin and bleeding, thus the odds of contamination are that much greater. But since there is virtually none involved with vaginal intercourse... its pretty hard to transmit. Contrary to popular belief, muccus membranes are not good at transmitting the disease.
-
The agency of health in Sweden came out with a recommendation a few years back, due to an increase of HIV cases.
There were probably around 50 each year reported before, and 100-200 after. So an increase.
This recommendation were for both men and women:
Those who were having sex with black males from West Africa were in the risk zone, and should test themselves if they had been fcuking around. Also, I think they suggested to avoid having sex with black males from West Africa?
It may have been the whole Africa too, can't remember exactly.
BTW, I didn't test myself. 8)
YIP
Zack
-
The agency of health in Sweden came out with a recommendation a few years back, due to an increase of HIV cases.
There were probably around 50 each year reported before, and 100-200 after. So an increase.
This recommendation were for both men and women:
Those who were having sex with black males from West Africa were in the risk zone, and should test themselves if they had been fcuking around. Also, I think they suggested to avoid having sex with black males from West Africa?
It may have been the whole Africa too, can't remember exactly.
BTW, I didn't test myself. 8)
YIP
Zack
Interesting. In America you'd probably want to avoid sex with white males, depending on their sexual preferences and drug habits.
-
The agency of health in Sweden came out with a recommendation a few years back, due to an increase of HIV cases.
Those who were having sex with black males from West Africa were in the risk zone, and should test themselves if they had been fcuking around. Also, I think they suggested to avoid having sex with black males from West Africa?
They'd be getting sued in the USA for dispersing such recommendations. Sad.
-
I heard just today that smokers are far more vulnerable to the virus than non smokers
btw
it is virtually impossible for a man to contract hiv from a woman during intercourse
So does that make Magic Johnson a homo?
-
Had to get tested for my Life Insurance policy, and though a lot of people worry, I KNEW mine would be negative.
Lol, I couldn't say that 15 years ago though. I don't think I ever wore a condom back then.
-
So does that make Magic Johnson a homo?
who knows...
-
I love Magic, but I think he was either gay or having kinky sex with people who were probably gay AND engaged in a very promiscuous lifestyle. His sexual practices were similar to those who frequented the SF bath houses. He had sex with dozens and dozens of women (and maybe men), sometimes two or three at a time. Forget where I read this, but I think this information comes from him (except for sleeping with men, which is my conjecture).
-
Several years ago I read "Black Lies, White Lies: The Truth According to Tony Brown." Part of his book argues that AIDs is not a heterosexual disease. Very, very interesting. He said, based on some evidence, that blood transfusions, intravenous drug use, and third world health conditions are the primary ways the disease is spread. The disease became rampant in the gay community, according to Brown, because of the sexual practices of many gays was so indiscriminate and random, involving multiple partners, etc. that they wound up contracting numerous STDs, which greatly impacted their immune system. He cited and quoted a gay guy who frequented the bath houses in SF and this guy had like ten different STDs and other illnesses related to his sexual practices.
If I recall correctly, he said you really can't find cases where a heterosexual contracts the disease through normal sex with another heterosexual. And that when those cases do arise, one of the partners got it from someone who fits the profile (blood transfusions, intravenous drug use, third world health/sex conditions).
I balked when I first read his theory, but after reading the entire section and thinking about it, I think it makes sense. Can't find the book, but I'm going to buy it again and try and quote the passages I read if this thread hangs around long enough.
I don't know how prevalent intravenous drug use is in Africa, India, or China . . . and I don't think gay sex alone is responsible for the extent of the disease there. what are "third world health conditions"? . . . untreated STDs . . . poor diet?
-
I don't know how prevalent intravenous drug use is in Africa, India, or China . . . and I don't think gay sex alone is responsible for the extent of the disease there. what are "third world health conditions"? . . . untreated STDs . . . poor diet?
I don't remember exactly. It has been a while since I read the book. I've ordered the book and I'll cite a few passages when it arrives.
-
I don't know how prevalent intravenous drug use is in Africa, India, or China . . . and I don't think gay sex alone is responsible for the extent of the disease there. what are "third world health conditions"? . . . untreated STDs . . . poor diet?
It's mostly poverty, lack of education, women having no say in their sexual relationships (can't ask the man to wear a condom), little or no available health care/medicine.
-
I heard just today that smokers are far more vulnerable to the virus than non smokers
btw
it is virtually impossible for a man to contract hiv from a woman during intercourse
unless her HIV positive B/friend his humping your anus at the same time
ta ta
-
It's mostly poverty, lack of education, women having no say in their sexual relationships (can't ask the man to wear a condom), little or no available health care/medicine.
women can get it from men (any trauma to vaginal/anal tissues increases their risk) . . . but they can't really give it to men . . . unless there was already an open sore or something of that nature on the penis.
-
I heard just today that smokers are far more vulnerable to the virus than non smokers
btw
it is virtually impossible for a man to contract hiv from a woman during intercourse
So if you smoke you're more likely to fuck some nasty whore? ::)
-
women can get it from men (any trauma to vaginal/anal tissues increases their risk) . . . but they can't really give it to men . . . unless there was already an open sore or something of that nature on the penis.
what an excellent image... :-X
-
what an excellent image... :-X
hey, I thought we were being scientific. ;D
-
So basically, the rule of thumb for women is, if planning to have unprotected sex with a new man in Sub-saharan Africa, it's important to examine his peepee for bleeding, ulcerous, cankerous wounds first. Got it. :P
-
So basically, the rule of thumb for women is, if planning to have unprotected sex with a new man in Sub-saharan Africa, it's important to examine his peepee for bleeding, ulcerous, cankerous wounds first. Got it. :P
then guys like Bezerker will have a very...very small examination
;)
-
raw anal sex = horrible urinary tract infection
-
On Howard Stern, Gary Garber (some reporter that ask ass hole questions to stars on the red carpet)
.. Asked the famous Bishop Desmond Tuti outside some place in NYC. He was like "Desmond tuti do you like unprotective sex ?" And he replied, " I always say to my people practice the ABC's ...Abstience...IF you can not abstain, ..BE....Be Faithful and if you cant be faithful...C ...Condomize!"
-
Okay. Got the Tony Brown book. Published in 1995. I was wrong about it not being a heterosexual disease. He posits that in the U.S. it is primarily spread through IV drug use and those who come into contact with people involved with IV drug users. Here are some excerpts from "Black Lies, White Lies" (kinda long):
"It has become abundantly clear, in spite of a great campaign of disinformation and reprehensible scare tactics, that 'AIDS' does not attack the general population. After fifteen years, it remains almost exclusively confined to IV-drug users (about 32 percent of the cases) and a subset of male homosexuals which accounted for about 60 percent of the total 140, 428 AIDS cases in the United States in 1991. The total number of homosexuals who have had 'AIDS' since it was discovered in 1981 was 217,012 as of December 1993."
"About 95 percent of those contract 'AIDS' have a history of drug use--according to Dr. Robert E. Willner in his book Deadly Deception. Willner quotes studies that claim it takes from '500 to 1,000 unprotected sexual encounters to transmit' HIV . . . ."
"The odds of a healthy non-drug-using heterosexual getting 'AIDS' are the same as for getting hit by lightening. And from a population of 255 million Americans, only 140, 428 were living with 'AIDS' as of 1994.
John Lauritsen and Hank Wilson, in their book Death Rush, accuse the CDC of fraud: 'The effect of the CDC's statistical trickery is to underreport IV-drug users as an AIDS group by at least 50 percent; the effect is to construe AIDS as a venereal disease, rather than a drug-induced condition."
One of the world's leading authorities on viruses and retroviruses, Dr. Peter Duesberg, "blames the rise of 'AIDS on the 'massive escalation in the consumption of recreational drugs' in the 1960s and 1970s. In a ten-year period alone, Americans increased their use of cocaine by 200 percent, while the use of amphetamines and poppers skyrocketed among homosexuals. Drug abuse, Duesberg says, resulted in the reemergence of old diseases such as tuberculosis--one of the 'AIDS' diseases--in the 1980s and 1990s."
"Duesberg's theory of how 'AIDS' spreads is simple to follow. He holds that 'AIDS' begins in those who are biologically most susceptible: people whose lifestyles make them perfect hosts for a 'benign' retrovirus (HIV). He says it that HIV hardly ever becomes active even in 'AIDS.' These 'thirdworldized' hosts, all of whom have ravaged their body in some way, include heterosexual drug addicts; and those drug-abusing homosexuals whose irresponsible 'bathhouse' sex behavior exposes them to lethal microbes and the spread of infections."
-
More:
"Michael Callen, one of the founders of the People with AIDS Coalition, lived twelve years with 'AIDS.' Just before his death, he offered a compelling confession in HEAL, a publication for alternative health therapies, that lends credence to Duesberg's 'DAIDS' theory [Drug Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome]:
By the age of 27, I estimate I had 3,000 different sex partners. I'd also had: hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis non-A, non-B; herpes simplex types 1 and 2; shigella; entamoeba histolytica; Giardia; syphilis; gonorrhea; nonspecific urethritis; chlamydia; venereal warts; CMV; EBV reactivations; and finally cryptosporidiosis and AIDS. The question for me wasn't why I was sick with AIDS but rather how I had been able to remain standing on two feet for so long. If you blanked out my name and handed my medical chart, prior to AIDS, to a doctor, she/he might reasonable have guessed that it was the chart of a 65-year-old equatorial African living in squalor.
"Callen very likely put his finger on what is the probable link between the 'AIDS' outbreak among high-risk groups in the West and the malnourished heterosexual population in Africa: a Third World health status. This sort of ravaged immune system first developed in the West among a bathhouse culture of male bisexuals and homosexuals, as well as heterosexual injection-drug users and homosexual long-term recreational drug abusers. These subcultures were extremely vulnerable because of debilitated bodies and a Third World hygiene status."
"`Something other than homosexuality' causes 'AIDS,' says Duesberg. 'Your all-American homosexual neighbor will never get 'AIDS.' It's only the ones who have hundreds, or thousands, of sexual contacts a year. And how is that achieved? Almost exclusively by chemicals.
"Drug abuse is rampant among homosexuals who practice promiscuous sex. For multiple orgasms and as an anal relaxant, this bathhouse subculture routinely uses 'poppers' (amyl nitrite inhalants), and their 'recreational' regime consists of PCP, amphetamines, angel dust, cocaine, heroin, uppers and downers, Valium, and alcohol,' Duesberg explains."
"In my opinion, then, the illness we call 'AIDS' in the United States is not by any means a 'homosexual disease.' I believe it is precipitated by a chemical injury, but it is also triggered by a variety of microorganisms as cofactors that destroys the body's immune system. The process is a deadly synergistic combustion. High-risk 'AIDS' behavior in the West is primarily drug abuse, receptive anal intercourse, poor hygiene, malnutrition, and unprotected sex--especially if there is a history of sexually transmitted diseases."
There is more, but my fingers are tired. :)
-
The ermmm "natives" here in South Africa think that if you have AIDS you can cure it by sleeping with a virgin.
-
unless her HIV positive B/friend his humping your anus at the same time
ta ta
then you should get tested at least once a month :P
-
anal or vaginal? I heard somewhere that anal is way easier to catch. Maybe it's jsut for the women's side tho.
Your also 100x more likely to get shit on your dick during anal sex!
-
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap.htm (http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap.htm)
Yes, it is possible for either partner to become infected with HIV through vaginal sex* (intercourse). In fact, it is the most common way the virus is transmitted in much of the world. HIV can be found in the blood, semen (cum), pre-seminal fluid (pre-cum) or vaginal fluid of a person infected with the virus.
Google is your friend.
-
the odds of getting hiv from unprotected vaginal sex with an infected woman are 1/500, figure out what % of the female population has aids and youll see your odds are approaching zero
an anal receiver, on the other hand, has a 1/4 chance of getting aids if his unprotected pitcher is carrying
condoms are supposed to reduce transmissons by about 10 fold for vaginal sex ( i dont know if its different for anal)
this is why in canada last i checked 75% of new transmission are still men (though thats down drastically from the ititial infection rates)
-
The prodigal son returns :)
-
the odds of getting hiv from unprotected vaginal sex with an infected woman are 1/500, figure out what % of the female population has aids and youll see your odds are approaching zero
an anal receiver, on the other hand, has a 1/4 chance of getting aids if his unprotected pitcher is carrying
condoms are supposed to reduce transmissons by about 10 fold for vaginal sex ( i dont know if its different for anal)
this is why in canada last i checked 75% of new transmission are still men (though thats down drastically from the ititial infection rates)
Nice to see that you know more about it then Center for Disease Control.
Should I be calling you Dr. Clubber Lang.
Or just Dr. Lang.
-
Nice to see that you know more about it then Center for Disease Control.
Should I be calling you Dr. Clubber Lang.
Or just Dr. Lang.
You'll call him sir if you know what's good for you...