Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: JediKnight on September 21, 2006, 09:02:43 PM

Title: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: JediKnight on September 21, 2006, 09:02:43 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=95613.0;attach=103427;image)


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=95804.0;attach=103624;image)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: XFACTOR on September 21, 2006, 09:04:51 PM


  I know one thing Jay's legs crush Ruhl's.  Wheels: Jay>Ruhl
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: thisiskeith12 on September 21, 2006, 09:05:50 PM
Please inform 240 he owes me $100
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Fury on September 21, 2006, 09:07:01 PM

  I know one thing Jay's legs crush Ruhl's.  Wheels: Jay>Ruhl

I wouldn't say that they crush Ruhl's.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: gmflex on September 21, 2006, 09:08:35 PM
The problem is the when Ruhl turns its all over..
Cutler has a better back 8)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: willie mosconi on September 21, 2006, 09:16:05 PM
Ruhl has a disgusting physique

He should NEVER beat Cutler

Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: jmt1 on September 21, 2006, 09:16:15 PM
cutler got 2nd on lock.

i think ruhl will get somewhere in the 5th-8th range.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: thisiskeith12 on September 21, 2006, 09:18:59 PM
Cutler got Ronnie beat!
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: IceCold on September 21, 2006, 09:22:47 PM
ruhls legs are harder than jay's but jay has better shape and sweep.

ruhl kills cutler from the front. but jay wins the back and he is usually a bit dryer than ruhl. 

but ruhl can beat cutler. 
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: rccs on September 22, 2006, 02:14:21 AM
ruhls legs are harder than jay's but jay has better shape and sweep.

ruhl kills cutler from the front. but jay wins the back and he is usually a bit dryer than ruhl. 

but ruhl can beat cutler. 
No doubt about that!
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: rocket on September 22, 2006, 02:16:15 AM
Cutler got Ronnie beat!

Pfft
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: nukkaready on September 22, 2006, 04:25:28 AM
Ruhl makes Cutler look like a school boy from the front...  ;D seriously both have their strength and weaknesses.. an open minded jury could very well place both athletes in the top 3.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: body88 on September 22, 2006, 04:38:09 AM
AHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHHA






Ruhl beating cutler : ::)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: phyxsius on September 22, 2006, 05:05:58 AM
Ruhl makes Cutler look like a school boy from the front...  ;D seriously both have their strength and weaknesses.. an open minded jury could very well place both athletes in the top 3.

I believe you're Ruhl's guy
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: nukkaready on September 22, 2006, 05:08:30 AM
I believe you're Ruhl's guy


You think you believe... well if you are into 'believing' you are better offer spending time in church than being on a message board.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Dorian 01 on September 22, 2006, 05:59:07 AM
If Ruhl comes in at his all time best, he'll crack the top 5.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Scimowser on September 22, 2006, 07:16:32 AM
i cant believe im actually reading this, someone actually thinks Ruhl is gonna challenge Jay for 2nd? Not a fuckin chance, when was the last time he was even close to Jay in a contest?  ::) He doesnt dwarf Jay, not even close. Lb for lb Jay has way more mass than Ruhl
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: phyxsius on September 22, 2006, 07:20:28 AM

You think you believe... well if you are into 'believing' you are better offer spending time in church than being on a message board.

So you're a Ronnie's fan too..
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Playboy on September 22, 2006, 07:24:03 AM
Keep dreaming. Ruhl cannot beat cutler. He has too many flaws. Sheer mass and freakiness does not win shows.

PB
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: nukkaready on September 22, 2006, 07:27:24 AM
i cant believe im actually reading this, someone actually thinks Ruhl is gonna challenge Jay for 2nd? Not a fuckin chance, when was the last time he was even close to Jay in a contest?  ::) He doesnt dwarf Jay, not even close. Lb for lb Jay has way more mass than Ruhl

An argument can be made that Ruhl should have beaten Cutler at the AC in 2003 when they were compared. Ruhl definitely has a bigger frame than Cutler and certainly has more mass than him lb for lb. Anyway... as always IFBB judges will be too close-minded to look past previous placings and the top names... just as you are.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Scimowser on September 22, 2006, 07:43:03 AM
Ruhl is about 275-280 at 5'11, Jay has 270 at 5'7 or so. How on earth can you say Ruhl has more lb for lb mass? Jays physique is on a level that Ruhl just wont get to because he hasnt got the tools to get there. Everything on his body is big but it doesnt blend that well IMO
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: SWOLETRAIN on September 22, 2006, 08:04:40 AM
Ruhl has a disgusting physique

He should NEVER beat Cutler


exactly......
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Mars on September 22, 2006, 08:16:44 AM
Ruhl has a disgusting physique

He should NEVER beat Cutler



Yes he's a fucking mess.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: UPINTHEMGUTS on September 22, 2006, 08:39:39 AM
Ruhl's bicep peaks are insane. :o
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: vein-x on September 22, 2006, 12:11:00 PM
AHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHHA






Ruhl beating cutler :o

Haha... this is what kills me about some people on Getbig. Look at the picture DIRECTLY ABOVE your post. What's so funny? It's almost like you read the thread title and then NOTHING in the thread and go directly to the REPLY button.

Monster irony really, when you consider which post preceeded yours  :D
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: body88 on September 22, 2006, 12:18:43 PM
An argument can be made that Ruhl should have beaten Cutler at the AC in 2003 when they were compared. Ruhl definitely has a bigger frame than Cutler and certainly has more mass than him lb for lb. Anyway... as always IFBB judges will be too close-minded to look past previous placings and the top names... just as you are.

Either that or they relize ruhl looks like shit next to cutler. Either or tho!
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: body88 on September 22, 2006, 12:19:32 PM
Haha... this is what kills me about some people on Getbig. Look at the picture DIRECTLY ABOVE your post. What's so funny? It's almost like you read the thread title and then NOTHING in the thread and go directly to the REPLY button.

Monster irony really, when you consider which post preceeded yours  :D

AHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHHA






Ruhl beating cutler  : ::)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Big Worm on September 22, 2006, 12:22:02 PM
Cutler got Ronnie beat!
Put the comparison pics up..!!!
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: cqfd on September 22, 2006, 01:19:48 PM
Ruhl's bicep peaks are insane. :o

as insane as ernie taylor tris...
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Jr. Yates on September 22, 2006, 02:23:16 PM
Put the comparison pics up..!!!
Is there any recent Ronnie pics?
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Royalty on September 22, 2006, 03:23:07 PM
i cant believe im actually reading this, someone actually thinks Ruhl is gonna challenge Jay for 2nd? Not a fuckin chance, when was the last time he was even close to Jay in a contest?  ::) He doesnt dwarf Jay, not even close. Lb for lb Jay has way more mass than Ruhl

(http://www.markus-ruehl.de/uploads/pics/2003a_arnolds4.jpg)   (http://www.markus-ruehl.de/uploads/pics/2003a_arnolds3.jpg)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: TrapsMcLats on September 22, 2006, 03:29:24 PM
well... those pics are from the 2004 ASC when cutler was wAYYY over dieted and flat as all hell, but i think even if cutler is as big as he can be with conditioning... a spot on ruhl can be VERY VERY dangerous.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Royalty on September 22, 2006, 03:37:26 PM
well... those pics are from the 2004 ASC when cutler was wAYYY over dieted and flat as all hell, but i think even if cutler is as big as he can be with conditioning... a spot on ruhl can be VERY VERY dangerous.


no the pics are from the 2003 ASC.


Ruhl utterly crushed Jay at the 2004. Ruhl looked to be 40lbs heavier (285 vs 245)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: quadzilla456 on September 22, 2006, 03:42:22 PM
(http://www.markus-ruehl.de/uploads/pics/2003a_arnolds4.jpg)   (http://www.markus-ruehl.de/uploads/pics/2003a_arnolds3.jpg)

Ruhl is taller than I thought. He looks to be one or two inches taller than Ronnie as well.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Royalty on September 22, 2006, 03:50:09 PM
Ronnie and Markus are about even in height

(http://www.bbszene.de/html/mro2004_finals/PA314116.JPG)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Hulkster on September 22, 2006, 03:54:56 PM
ruhl's back will always keep him down.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Royalty on September 22, 2006, 04:03:56 PM
ruhl's back will always keep him down.


his back is very big and wide. his detail is s l o w l y comming in


but lets see another pic from the front!  2000 mr o

(http://www.getbig.com/pics/olympia/2000/pre/markus01.jpg)(http://www.getbig.com/pics/olympia/2000/pre/ronnie01.jpg)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Scimowser on September 23, 2006, 02:10:00 AM
thats the thing about Ruhl, he looks like hes 320 but weighs 280. However i stand by what i said, Jay is 270 and is a good 3-4" shorter  so he has more muscle lb for lb.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Sir William Idol on September 23, 2006, 02:23:16 AM
(http://www.ruhl-movie.com/galerie/2002noc.jpg)
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: stomper on September 23, 2006, 02:49:42 AM
branch warren will place 2nd
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: phyxsius on September 23, 2006, 04:43:03 AM
branch warren will place 2nd

why not first?
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: nukkaready on September 23, 2006, 07:16:14 AM
thats the thing about Ruhl, he looks like hes 320 but weighs 280. However i stand by what i said, Jay is 270 and is a good 3-4" shorter  so he has more muscle lb for lb.

You really need to get away from making weight references. Neither you nor I know how much those guys really weigh off season or come contest day. There is no official weigh in as in boxing for instance. Bodybuilders are known to blow everything out of proportion especially when it comes to weight and measurments. Fact is on any comparison pic you can find between Markus and Jay, be it old or recent, Markus is wider, thicker and bigger. The comparison photos posted in this thread make it painfully obvious. Unfortunately, we do have a close minded judging panel so nothing will change...
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: richbmraz03 on September 23, 2006, 07:45:56 AM
Agree w/ Royality, if Ruhl come's in to the O looking like he did at 03 ASC, or 02NOC , Will give Cutler & Ronnie a run ;D
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Option D on September 23, 2006, 07:47:54 AM
Ruhls genetics wont allow him to beat cutler...i actually dont think he has triceps. like at all
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: nukkaready on September 23, 2006, 07:51:29 AM
Ruhls genetics wont allow him to beat cutler...i actually dont think he has triceps. like at all

Ruhl already beat Cutler... so much for his genetics won't allow it ;D... the judges won't allow it to happen again.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: MikeThaMachine on September 23, 2006, 08:07:54 AM
An argument can be made that Ruhl should have beaten Cutler at the AC in 2003 when they were compared. Ruhl definitely has a bigger frame than Cutler and certainly has more mass than him lb for lb. Anyway... as always IFBB judges will be too close-minded to look past previous placings and the top names... just as you are.


Let's see...............

(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_084.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_085.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_086.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_087.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_088.jpg)

Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: willie mosconi on September 23, 2006, 08:32:04 AM
nobody has mentioned the blatant synthol abuse yet  :-\
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: the shadow on September 23, 2006, 09:36:56 AM

Let's see...............

(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_084.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_085.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_086.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_087.jpg)
(http://www.fitnesspont.hu/mass-shop/picture_gallery/Arnold_Classic/2003/Arnold_Classic_2003_088.jpg)


ruhl wins hands down.no contest.it sucks they gave it to gutler
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: wannahit2 on September 23, 2006, 10:18:37 AM
Insane, Ruhl couldn't touch Cutler. Jay looks awesome 1 week out.  Secondly, I will say that Jay doesn't finish second, and is  beat by Victor Martinez.  Victor looks unreal, saw him last week. 

The top 6 is going to be a fight and a half. Can't wait

Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: willie mosconi on September 23, 2006, 01:05:08 PM
Ruhl is so structurally flawed that Cutler could never lose to him unless he is really out of shape
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: Matt C on September 23, 2006, 01:39:03 PM
Ruhl is so structurally flawed that Cutler could never lose to him unless he is really out of shape

Jay has the same structural flaws only to a lesser extent.  It mainly stems from both having a wide waist which detracts from their respective tapers.  That having been said, Ruhl's muscle density and hardness trumps Jay's.  Jay is superior in many ways though.  All in all, I would say they are closer than usually recognized to be.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: nukkaready on September 23, 2006, 01:45:46 PM
Ruhl is so structurally flawed that Cutler could never lose to him unless he is really out of shape

RIGHT :P ... and Cutler is the epitomy of symetrie and a flowing physique... ;D
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: willie mosconi on September 23, 2006, 06:12:39 PM
RIGHT :P ... and Cutler is the epitomy of symetrie and a flowing physique... ;D

Yeah, Cutler is no Flex Wheeler, but he definitely more structurally sound than Ruhl
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: body88 on September 23, 2006, 06:31:08 PM
RIGHT :P ... and Cutler is the epitomy of symetrie and a flowing physique... ;D

Ruhl makes cutler look like robbie robinson.
Title: Re: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place?
Post by: rccs on October 25, 2006, 08:44:32 AM
Jay has the same structural flaws only to a lesser extent.  It mainly stems from both having a wide waist which detracts from their respective tapers.  That having been said, Ruhl's muscle density and hardness trumps Jay's.  Jay is superior in many ways though.  All in all, I would say they are closer than usually recognized to be.
Well, I don't think that Jay and Rhul are closer. As far as Rhul physic's flaws is concerned, I think that people are confusing freaky big muscles with flaws. There are no flaws on Rhul's physic! I honestly think that this year he would be a serious candidate for mr. O's numero uno!!!