Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:40:56 AM

Title: Ronnie Lost! Bull! No Way!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:40:56 AM
Now there is nobody to take the throne from what I've seen onstage that night. They are all big but all proportions are bad! I don't see anyone deserving of the Olympia throne. Jay doesn't know what a cut is dammit!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Stavios on October 01, 2006, 08:42:35 AM
Jay was the best man alexxx

get over it, he had plenty of cuts at the night show with the better lightning
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:43:28 AM
Jay was the best man alexxx

get over it, he had plenty of cuts at the night show with the better lightning

Jay doesn't have a cut on him or striation dammit!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 08:45:05 AM
Now there is nobody to take the throne from what I've seen onstage that night. They are all big but all proportions are bad! I don't see anyone deserving of the Olympia throne. Jay doesn't know what a cut is dammit!

I thought it was "internet protocal" to NOT put the winners name in a title...i got my ass chewed from "icecold" last week >:(

Lisa

PS. HA! HA! I said Jay would win ;D
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 08:45:41 AM
Jay was the best man alexxx

get over it, he had plenty of cuts at the night show with the better lightning

(http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/lightning_kpno.jpg)
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:45:58 AM
Jay shape is remnificent of a bull with a tan on thats all!

I think if Melvin stops screwing around in the gym and starts working chest, quads, and calves he could win it!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 08:46:57 AM
I thought it was "internet protocal" to NOT put the winners name in a title...i got my ass chewed from "icecold" last week >:(

Lisa

PS. HA! HA! I said Jay would win ;D

Thats because you spoiled the outcome of a sport.

The outcome that would be televised after.

Nobody should need to explain this to you because the difference between pageantry and a popular sport is blatantly obvious.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Stavios on October 01, 2006, 08:47:27 AM
why do you keep arguing and make me find a picture to own you once again alexxx..  :-\
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:47:52 AM
(http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0007/lightning_kpno.jpg)

hahahaha
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Marty Champions on October 01, 2006, 08:48:30 AM
i think i shouldve won it (http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/honigga/getbig2007.jpg)
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Weightpit on October 01, 2006, 08:49:41 AM
Jay doesn't have a cut on him or striation dammit!

Yep....no cuts on Cuts!!   ::)


 
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:49:41 AM
why do you keep arguing and make me find a picture to own you once again alexxx..  :-\

Ok so he has cuts on his legs... big deal I have those too! He should have cuts and striations on that chest and arms and everything else which he seems to be lagging. Arnold woould win against this Jay's conditition.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Marty Champions on October 01, 2006, 08:50:10 AM
why do you keep arguing and make me find a picture to own you once again alexxx..  :-\

i would dwarf jay he would look up at me like a small child, and say "daddy waddy you are huuuuuyyuuuuuuuuuuge"
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Stavios on October 01, 2006, 08:51:10 AM
whatever
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:51:47 AM
i think i shouldve won it (http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/honigga/getbig2007.jpg)

Everybody take note... this is what cuts and striations look like!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Hulkster on October 01, 2006, 08:52:12 AM
I have said it before and I will say it again:

jay looks much better in transition than he does in any mandatory pose.

all those great shots from the 2001 Ironman?

Notice none of them are mandatories.

Just an observation that I have stated before and is worth repeating.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:52:58 AM
whatever

You want a tissue?
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Stavios on October 01, 2006, 08:53:37 AM
I have said it before and I will say it again:

jay looks much better in transition than he does in any mandatory pose.

all those great shots from the 2001 Ironman?

Notice none of them are mandatories.

Just an observation that I have stated before and is worth repeating.

actually hulkster, I am a big Ronnie fan but I never thought he would came in looking as shitty as this year

he could have been third behind Victor, damn it !

he is finished
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Marty Champions on October 01, 2006, 08:54:12 AM
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/honigga/getbig20072.jpg)

note the middle ab sepereration, and im not fully dieted down either i couldve been a walk on champ , and jogged all the way from NC to the contest if i could afford some decent running shoes.

when i win the sandow i am going to donate it to getbig.com and have my gold medal melted down into little coins to give too all of you, my friends to the end!!!!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: HERACLES on October 01, 2006, 08:54:17 AM
Now there is nobody to take the throne from what I've seen onstage that night. They are all big but all proportions are bad! I don't see anyone deserving of the Olympia throne. Jay doesn't know what a cut is dammit!

Jay is the best example of the physique everyone was hating ronnie year after year about....so everyone should  STFU, bc you have the new mr O with great prportions, midsection, and balance.

The mass monster Ronnie COleman was beaten yeaturday, so  this should make many people happy....

I bet you he will compete next year, after he realises he could of won #8 yesturday if he was 15-20lbs lighter.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Marty Champions on October 01, 2006, 08:56:23 AM
jay had huge wiiiiiiiiiiiiide lats from the front, pretty impressive how he got so wide i wonder if he is shooting up right under the arm pits?
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 01, 2006, 08:57:25 AM
Jay is the best example of the physique everyone was hating ronnie year after year about....so everyone should  STFU, bc you have the new mr O with great prportions, midsection, and balance.

The mass monster Ronnie COleman was beaten yeaturday, so  this should make many people happy....

I bet you he will compete next year, after he realises he could of won #8 yesturday if he was 15-20lbs lighter.

I take offence to the following. All Jay has is size. Nothing else.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: SteelePegasus on October 01, 2006, 08:59:57 AM
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/honigga/getbig20072.jpg)

note the middle ab sepereration, and im not fully dieted down either i couldve been a walk on champ , and jogged all the way from NC to the contest if i could afford some decent running shoes.

when i win the sandow i am going to donate it to getbig.com and have my gold medal melted down into little coins to give too all of you, my friends to the end!!!!

LOL, you are amusing I will give you that much credit
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: delta9mda on October 01, 2006, 09:02:37 AM
I have said it before and I will say it again:

jay looks much better in transition than he does in any mandatory pose.

all those great shots from the 2001 Ironman?

Notice none of them are mandatories.

Just an observation that I have stated before and is worth repeating.
kleenex?
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Hulkster on October 01, 2006, 09:08:25 AM
actually hulkster, I am a big Ronnie fan but I never thought he would came in looking as shitty as this year

he could have been third behind Victor, damn it !

he is finished

vic looked very good.

His style of physique is the future of the sport

shapely and detailed, like the Ronnie of old.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Stavios on October 01, 2006, 09:09:32 AM
vic looked very good.

His style of physique is the future of the sport

shapely and detailed, like the Ronnie of old.

Yes, Victor with 10-15 more pounds with the same condition and waist size would be scary !
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 10:49:41 AM
Thats because you spoiled the outcome of a sport.

The outcome that would be televised after.

Nobody should need to explain this to you because the difference between pageantry and a popular sport is blatantly obvious.

Shut-up "rocket", and don't be such a  :'( baby.

Lisa
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 06:19:07 PM
Shut-up "rocket", and don't be such a  :'( baby.

Lisa

I'm just responding to your inane whining about non existant double standards, you illogical gimp :)
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 06:26:54 PM
I'm just responding to your inane whining about non existant double standards, you illogical gimp :)


I'm so sorry about my "inane? whining"...and do tell about my "double standards", though...

love from,
the "illogical gimp" Lisa (by the way, that's a good one!!! HAR! HAR! HARRRR!!!!)
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: 240 is Back on October 01, 2006, 06:29:31 PM
dadddywaddy, did your most muscular check arrive yet? 

monster deserving. you look better now than on contest day!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 08:12:36 PM
I'm so sorry about my "inane? whining"...and do tell about my "double standards", though...

love from,
the "illogical gimp" Lisa (by the way, that's a good one!!! HAR! HAR! HARRRR!!!!)

I already explained this to you.  Look at what you wrote.

I thought it was "internet protocal" to NOT put the winners name in a title...i got my ass chewed from "icecold" last week >:(

Yes, thats right.  Its inane.  Its whining.  Its a non existent double standard.  All in all, illogical nonsense from a board halfwit.

::)

Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 08:17:05 PM
I already explained this to you.  Look at what you wrote.

Yes, thats right.  Its inane.  Its whining.  Its a non existent double standard.  All in all, illogical nonsense from a board halfwit.

::)



Because i made a mistake and didn't know what the so called "internet protocal" was? You call that whining? Please. Come on over to my house and i'll show you "whining".

halfwit
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: gtbro1 on October 01, 2006, 08:37:50 PM
Because i made a mistake and didn't know what the so called "internet protocal" was? You call that whining? Please. Come on over to my house and i'll show you "whining".

halfwit

   I think before they were just upset because you gave the name of the winner of a fight.It isn't the same as knowing who won a bodybuilding show. In a fight the excitement comes from Not knowing what will happen next,and If a certain fighter will "pull it off" or "get out of this hold" or whatever.No such anticipation when you are only awaiting a judges decision...and of coarse they had planned on watching that fight later.





     at least that is my opinion . :-\
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 09:35:48 PM
Because i made a mistake and didn't know what the so called "internet protocal" was? You call that whining? Please. Come on over to my house and i'll show you "whining".

halfwit

No not because you made a mistake

Because you reference the 10,000th thread on the olympia outcome as a "spoiler" thread when in reality there is no telecast of the olympia to be spoiled for someone anyway.

You made a honest (but poor) mistake by posting the outcome of that fight but it has nothing to do with the olympia results threads.

Cut your losses rather than choosing some random to whine at. 

There's no excuses for idiocy here and you can invite me to your house as many times as you like, you'll get called on bullshit every time.  I hope you'd do the same for me if I post shit (baha unlikely).

Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 09:57:21 PM
No not because you made a mistake

Because you reference the 10,000th thread on the olympia outcome as a "spoiler" thread when in reality there is no telecast of the olympia to be spoiled for someone anyway.


What? You are crazy...please tell me all.

Lisa
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 10:03:45 PM
You compained earlier on in this thread that you were criticised for mentioning the name of a winner in a thread title like alexxx was violating the same "silent" rule that exists for outcomes of sport. 

Aside from the obvious fact that there is no spoiling something that will not be replayed anywhere (unlike that fight) you chose literally about the 100th thread saying the same thing (or variation thereof).



Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: gtbro1 on October 01, 2006, 10:25:54 PM
You compained earlier on in this thread that you were criticised for mentioning the name of a winner in a thread title like alexxx was violating the same "silent" rule that exists for outcomes of sport. 

Aside from the obvious fact that there is no spoiling something that will not be replayed anywhere (unlike that fight) you chose literally about the 100th thread saying the same thing (or variation thereof).





   this is not my quarrel but....I agree.



 
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 10:30:53 PM
You compained earlier on in this thread that you were criticised for mentioning the name of a winner in a thread title like alexxx was violating the same "silent" rule that exists for outcomes of sport. 

Aside from the obvious fact that there is no spoiling something that will not be replayed anywhere (unlike that fight) you chose literally about the 100th thread saying the same thing (or variation thereof).





Show me where i've said it more than 2 times.

Lisa
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 10:31:48 PM
   this is not my quarrel but....I agree.



 

Oh, ok, gtbro...i can only imagine everything you know about this sport ::)

Lisa
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 10:33:55 PM
Show me where i've said it more than 2 times.

Lisa

Hah no I mean alexxx's thread is about the 100th on the same topic saying virtually the same thing, not that you've said it numerous times.

Gtbro is right, because he agrees with me.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 01, 2006, 10:36:05 PM
Gtbro is right, because he agrees with me.

 ::)

Lisa

PS. night night
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: gtbro1 on October 01, 2006, 10:36:45 PM
Oh, ok, gtbro...i can only imagine everything you know about this sport ::)

Lisa

  I only ment I agree with what he said about the fight and this being about the 100th thread to "give away" the winner of the Olympia.It wasn't a slam toward you.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: rocket on October 01, 2006, 11:08:46 PM
  I only ment I agree with what he said about the fight and this being about the 100th thread to "give away" the winner of the Olympia.It wasn't a slam toward you.

She knows that, she's just interesting in mud slinging anybody who disagrees with her, despite the fact she now knows that she was wrong.  (It took a while)
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: ramazon on October 01, 2006, 11:23:31 PM
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/honigga/getbig20072.jpg)

note the middle ab sepereration, and im not fully dieted down either i couldve been a walk on champ , and jogged all the way from NC to the contest if i could afford some decent running shoes.

when i win the sandow i am going to donate it to getbig.com and have my gold medal melted down into little coins to give too all of you, my friends to the end!!!!
Wow, Daddy.  WHOA, Daddy!  You say you want some running shoes?  What
size, Pappa?  Want some socks, too?  Heck, I'll throw in a whole jogging SUIT for
another shot, say, a side chest of ya.  And do the lips again, please.  Too much!
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: ToxicAvenger on October 01, 2006, 11:25:27 PM
Now there is nobody to take the throne from what I've seen onstage that night. They are all big but all proportions are bad! I don't see anyone deserving of the Olympia throne. Jay doesn't know what a cut is dammit!


alex you dont know JACK shit about BBing...you shound like a fucking NOOB tryi...wait you r a fucking noob trying to get attention..... :-\


Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Fatpanda on October 02, 2006, 03:28:53 AM
toxic i think you know jack shit about bodybuilding if you honestly think jay beat ronnie. look at the comparision pics 240 made up, jay has a layer of water and fat all over him, his gut was as big as ronnies, the only thing he had over ronnie was an extra tri and lat. ronnie dominated him in every pose bar the rear shots.

as far as who should have been mr o, dex was the best man to fit the criteria. 
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Samourai Pizzacat on October 02, 2006, 03:48:13 AM
toxic i think you know jack shit about bodybuilding if you honestly think jay beat ronnie. look at the comparision pics 240 made up, jay has a layer of water and fat all over him, his gut was as big as ronnies, the only thing he had over ronnie was an extra tri and lat. ronnie dominated him in every pose bar the rear shots.

I hink it's funny how people have been saying for over ten years (dorian/Ronnie reign) that the back would make or break a mr olympia. Now that Cutler had Ronnie on back all the Ronnie nuthuggers are screaming ' but he had him on the front'. 
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Fatpanda on October 02, 2006, 04:53:30 AM
no pizzacat, every year we have been saying ronnie dominated him in EVERY pose, the only difference is this year it was he lost the rear poses, add it all up, ronnie should have still won.

he won via politics pure and simple. i'd love ronnie to take time off heal, come back bigger than ever win the mr o next year then announce at the victory speach he's leaving for the PDI, ben would have a heart attack !
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 07:09:15 AM

alex you dont know JACK shit about BBing...you shound like a fucking NOOB tryi...wait you r a fucking noob trying to get attention..... :-\




lol this coming from a guy who presses the 90s all juiced up!!! LOL
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Mydavid on October 02, 2006, 12:28:09 PM
She knows that, she's just interesting in mud slinging anybody who disagrees with her, despite the fact she now knows that she was wrong.  (It took a while)

You are CRAZYYYYYY!!! That statement is horrible...go pick on someone your own size dummy >:(

Lisa
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Option D on October 02, 2006, 12:39:46 PM
Jay shape is remnificent of a bull with a tan on thats all!

I think if Melvin stops screwing around in the gym and starts working chest, quads, and calves he could win it!
I agree 100% Jay was nothing but shoulders and calves. Vic came in better than jay. I actually think they fucked Gunter out of some placings also. Jay was off. I have seen better.
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Weightpit on October 02, 2006, 12:53:48 PM
LOL, you are amusing I will give you that much credit

Jeeze...you can tell this dude loves himself......he even puckers up at the camera!!

Yikes.........
Title: Re: Ronnie Lost! Bull! No Way!!!
Post by: Marty Champions on December 22, 2014, 08:02:14 PM
 8)
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: Marty Champions on December 22, 2014, 08:50:47 PM
i think i shouldve won it (http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y256/honigga/getbig2007.jpg)
almost had it!!!!!!
Title: Re: Ronnie Lost! Bull! No Way!!!
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on December 22, 2014, 09:00:41 PM
Legendary Master of Time, Space, and every Goddamn thing in between.
Title: Re: Ronnie Lost! Bull! No Way!!!
Post by: AbrahamG on December 23, 2014, 12:26:25 AM
Sure if he could suck his own cock, he would.
Title: Re: Ronnie Lost! Bull! No Way!!!
Post by: Kim Jong Bob on December 23, 2014, 12:46:40 AM
Sure if he could suck his own cock, he would.
falcons dick is long, if he loose some of the fat and stretch im sure he can do k
Title: Re: GUYS RONNIE LOST!±!!!!!!!!!????????????!!!!!!!!?????!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!!!
Post by: d0nny2600 on December 23, 2014, 01:08:30 AM
almost had it!!!!!!
You looked great here Falcon.