then we can play the hypocrisy game as well here on the EIB Network.
I would respect him greatly if he called for a full investigation and was upset about haskert forgetting he was ever told about it.
Isn't that what Rush is known for... playing the hypocrisy game? ::)
Bottom line is the perv was sexually harassing and preying on underage school boys and the GOP were covering it up for over 5 years!
For 5 years? The kid was 16, are you trying to tell he that he started as a page when he was 11?
Considering what he does for a living, why would he call for that? He's not in the House. You do realize that he and Hannity have the biggest listening audiance in radio and that said, they have the power to help move votes to the Right.
Is he condoning the coverup in order to keep votes?
What is Rush's goal?
Is he a voice of the people, eager to do the right thing and make the world a better place?
Or is his purpose to convert people to the republican party?
I was under the impression that Rush (who I used to listen to a lot) was all about making the US a better country.
Is he condoning the coverup in order to keep votes?
of course he doesn't condone it, he's pointing out the hipocracy of the democratic party. They didn't distance themselves from Barney Frank and the other guys when he had his prostitution ring but they want Foleys head and job on a silver platter for hitting on a 16 year (and he should be shot, but it's like the kid didn't know better, he's 16 not 6). I seriously don't think this would be as big of an issue if it wasn't so close to the elections, but we had Republican who screwed up and it's going to cost us a seat!
Look at the mental giant known as Mr. Intenseone try and deflect attention away from his beloved party and direct it onto his hated enemy the "Liberals". ::)
You seriously need a new hobby because bashing liberals while your party flops, flounders and fails miserably isn't helping your cause.
Nothing in the world worse than a zealot and right wing zealots are as bad as it gets.
I'm curious, when you're pounding your wife/girlfriend/hooker from behind do you fantasize that it's actually some perverse amalgamation of Limbaugh/Bush that you're pushing your seed into? Or are you so wrapped up in hating liberals that sex would take too much of your focus away from your true purpose in life, namely being a moronic right wing zealot?
Nice Liberal spin.....now leave before I call security!
Too bad I'm not a liberal, genius. Tragically left wing liberals are almost as bad as you are, almost but not quite.
Why is it when someone calls someone else a Liberal they're offended?
Did anyone try to cover it up?
Haskert may now have to resign.
I heard that this morning the Dems are calling for his resignation and I almost threw up......gimme a freaking break!!
I'm up early and feel like arguing today :)
Anyone wanna defend Hastert?
RUSH: I have to admit, my friends, I'm a little confused about certain aspects of the situation here involving Mark Foley and the page. Now, the school system, the public school system has since the late eighties been teaching us that kids are going to have sex, we can't stop 'em, it's not our business to stop 'em. I mean, we've gone so far as teaching them to use condoms with bananas, or in some cases peanuts, cucumbers, but peanuts, too. You have to give them all life possibilities out there. And we had parents out on Long Island who are inviting their kids to have their boyfriend or girlfriend spend the night at the house because it would be cleaner and safer than if they were conjugating in the back seat of the family sedan. They went so far as to say we might even put a pack of cigarettes on the nightstand so that you can have a smoke after you have sex. Now I realize that that's sex among teenagers, but the public education sex ed. program does not say that it's wrong. You start talking abstinence to them, and they go nuts. Yeah, easy for you to say. We can't stop these kids, so we gave 'em condoms to encourage the risky behavior.
Now, the liberals also tell us that sex and gender issues are just lifestyles, not choices. Maybe choices in the case of sex changes like the chopadickoffame and the adadictomy, but these are just lifestyle things, gender and so forth, we're not to condemn. Any two people can love each other, any four people can love each other. You can define your family however you want, including your animal or animals. This we have been taught by the tolerant left among us. Kids can have sex, too. Not with somebody just in their age-group, alternative lifestyles, but not if the person is sexually active but younger, apparently. So we find here that there are limits. There are things that will offend liberals. Or are there? Because I continue to ask, are they really offended by this? How many of them wish they were in on the action?
Gary Studds's person was 17 years old, Barney Frank, Stephen Gobie was running a little male prostitution ring out of Barney's basement, and Barney didn't know about it, he said. He arranged, I think he got 33 parking tickets fixed so that the visitors could park right there in front of Barney's pad. But I don't believe that they find what Foley did repugnant. They have defended it too often when it has been discovered to have taken place amongst their ranks. Look it, if they want to play the hypocrisy game, which they are doing, and that's what they think is the strong suit that they have, sort of like the ace-in-the-hole, then we can play the hypocrisy game as well here on the EIB Network.