Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: IceCold on October 03, 2006, 11:52:18 AM

Title: For Hulkster
Post by: IceCold on October 03, 2006, 11:52:18 AM
(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/dy71.jpg)


Dorian: " dont you feel stupid now, hulkster".
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: freespirit on October 03, 2006, 12:53:06 PM
Ha ha.  ;D
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on October 03, 2006, 02:19:46 PM
nice arms :P
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: phyxsius on October 03, 2006, 03:34:49 PM
OWNED
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on October 03, 2006, 04:01:28 PM
What's worse: what just happened or Yates intimidated into retiring? ;D
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: WOOO on October 03, 2006, 04:05:22 PM
loser.

tadpole
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: Shockwave on October 03, 2006, 04:29:24 PM
What's worse: what just happened or Yates intimidated into retiring? ;D
What just happened.
Yates common sense > Ronnie's
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on October 03, 2006, 04:35:03 PM
What just happened.
Yates common sense > Ronnie's

no, and here is why:

Nasser at his best would have pushed Yates over the limit if they competed in 1998.

At that point, Dorian was so torn up it would have been hard to win even if he was in shape.

Here is the difference with Ronnie:

all he had to do was show up in his 2005 shape and he would have won.

Plain and simple.

Jay won because ronnie was off.

not because Ronnie was so badly injured that he could not possibly win anymore.

dorian at the end of his career had a torn bi, torn tri and torn quads.

pretty tough to compete with nasser like that.

 In 2006, l ronnie had to do was drop some water:

(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/photos/655/Men/IMG_8426.jpg)
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/photos/655/Men/IMG_8391.jpg)
and Jay, in shape or not, would have been negated to second. fair and square.
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on October 03, 2006, 04:38:32 PM
To Yates nuthuggers, your wakeup call...
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=98084.0
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: Shockwave on October 03, 2006, 04:57:06 PM
To Yates nuthuggers, your wakeup call...
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=98084.0
Hahaha.
Desperate.
Ronnie looked like shit. He lost. End of story.
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: bailey on October 03, 2006, 05:09:02 PM
Yea, he did look amazing in 2005. Jay would not have beatin that package.
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: Hulkster on October 03, 2006, 05:11:58 PM
that it was is somewhat sad about Jay being the champion -

I am sure he would have liked to have beaten Ronnie fair and square when they were both in shape.

but the fact is, Jay only won because Ronnie was way off, even compared to 2005.

i am sure Jay would have wanted it to have been different.

after all, how would you feel as a champion who everyone knows only won because your opponent screwed up, not necessarily because you are better?
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 03, 2006, 05:36:13 PM
that it was is somewhat sad about Jay being the champion -

I am sure he would have liked to have beaten Ronnie fair and square when they were both in shape.

but the fact is, Jay only won because Ronnie was way off, even compared to 2005.

i am sure Jay would have wanted it to have been different.

after all, how would you feel as a champion who everyone knows only won because your opponent screwed up, not necessarily because you are better?

Like Ronnie in 98/99? lol
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: bailey on October 03, 2006, 05:37:52 PM
2001 Arnold !! Ronnies best condition ever !!!
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: body88 on October 03, 2006, 08:33:11 PM
that it was is somewhat sad about Jay being the champion -

I am sure he would have liked to have beaten Ronnie fair and square when they were both in shape.

but the fact is, Jay only won because Ronnie was way off, even compared to 2005.

i am sure Jay would have wanted it to have been different.

after all, how would you feel as a champion who everyone knows only won because your opponent screwed up, not necessarily because you are better?


You would think with only eating, sleeping,lifting and shitting for a whole year of his life to get ready for one contest Ronnie could have put it together to beat Cutler. Weird? One would think he would want to bring his A game to a contest like that. He was only going for the all time record! Does the old man not have it anymore? I mean was he to busy to train like he normally would? What is the deal?Hell theres always next year!

Why did you not chim in my threads qouting all the pros stating Coleman lost fair and square? I only see you in the threads the Ronnie riders are congregating in.
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: pumpster on October 03, 2006, 08:35:16 PM
Jay is the Yates & Columbu of the new millenium; he'll have to do until someone great comes along. 
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: IceCold on October 03, 2006, 08:44:47 PM
no, and here is why:

Nasser at his best would have pushed Yates over the limit if they competed in 1998.

At that point, Dorian was so torn up it would have been hard to win even if he was in shape.

Here is the difference with Ronnie:

all he had to do was show up in his 2005 shape and he would have won.

Plain and simple.

Jay won because ronnie was off.

not because Ronnie was so badly injured that he could not possibly win anymore.

dorian at the end of his career had a torn bi, torn tri and torn quads.

pretty tough to compete with nasser like that.

 In 2006, l ronnie had to do was drop some water:




dorian actually wanted to retire in 96, but wanted to one more year to proove his was the best.

the main reason dorian retired was that his tricep tear left him unable to train the way he liked.

i would find it hard to see dorian loose.  he always managed a way to win, even in the event of injuries, but in 98 he seemed to have amassed too many.  hence, he retired. 
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: IceCold on October 03, 2006, 08:46:00 PM
that it was is somewhat sad about Jay being the champion -

I am sure he would have liked to have beaten Ronnie fair and square when they were both in shape.

but the fact is, Jay only won because Ronnie was way off, even compared to 2005.

i am sure Jay would have wanted it to have been different.

after all, how would you feel as a champion who everyone knows only won because your opponent screwed up, not necessarily because you are better?

jay of 2006 vs. ronnie in 05.  i think jay would have won.  he still had the edge on hardness.  you can see coleman getting worse.

however, it would have been VERY close and controversial no matter who won. 
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: Yorkie T on October 04, 2006, 02:11:36 AM
no, and here is why:

Nasser at his best would have pushed Yates over the limit if they competed in 1998.

At that point, Dorian was so torn up it would have been hard to win even if he was in shape.

Here is the difference with Ronnie:

all he had to do was show up in his 2005 shape and he would have won.

Plain and simple.

Jay won because ronnie was off.

not because Ronnie was so badly injured that he could not possibly win anymore.

dorian at the end of his career had a torn bi, torn tri and torn quads.

pretty tough to compete with nasser like that.

 In 2006, l ronnie had to do was drop some water:

(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/photos/655/Men/IMG_8426.jpg)
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/photos/655/Men/IMG_8391.jpg)
and Jay, in shape or not, would have been negated to second. fair and square.


Ronnies right delt looks ok there, so i suppose it shows that in those other pictures he really must not have been fully flexing them.
Title: Re: For Hulkster
Post by: phyxsius on October 04, 2006, 02:30:09 AM
Look at how "off" Ronnie is here.  ::)

Weird right delts