Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Alternative Boards => Relationship Talk, Questions, Pictures & More! (18+) => Topic started by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 06:27:00 AM



Title: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 06:27:00 AM
It doesn't look gay, at all.  There's nothing gay about a guy holding tires.  Now, if it was two guys each holding a tire while kissing.......That's gay.

::)

I always have a laugh when you guys call pics like this "gay". The dude is holding tires and sitting down in these pics. He doesn't have his cock out with a sign that says "come get it boys"

I always laugh when guys look at pix like the ones below and say “I don’t see anything gay about it” because, in effect, what you are really saying is that you are not very bright.  A picture does not have to consist of two guys having sex in order for it to be gay.

Many (most) of the editors, writers, photographers, and stylists (people who set up and manage these photo shoots) are gay. This is not conjecture on my part; several of them are publicly out on gay message boards.  Who do you think they are styling and framing these photos for? Women?  Um, no.  They know who their audience is, and they know the kinds of images that generate publicity and profits.  Bodybuilding is funded by male schmoes—many of them gay, bi, or closeted.  

Learning how to weight train is something everyone can legitimately be interested in, but let’s be honest, you can learn all there is to know in a couple months (a week or two if you are serious).  Weight training for yourself is also a legitimate undertaking, but spending money to attend show after show, collecting years worth of magazines, and a library of muscle videos crosses into the gay zone.  I’m willing to bet that by the time you have made your way to getbig you already know how to train biceps, abs, legs, chest, etc.  So why would you continue to spend money on this stuff?

If you honestly think ogling heavily muscled men in thongs over and over for years on end (as so many bb fans do) is an interest of heterosexual men you are dim indeed.  As I have said in other posts connecting...the...dots. .. is not something everyone can do.  So be it.

There are plenty of heterosexual men and women who will look at these Wolf pix and espy the gay aesthetic.  (The original Herb Ritts photo that inspired all the Wolf copycat pics is below; and yes, Ritts was a gay photographer).



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 06:29:37 AM
Another example:  When this pic of Doz was posted a few months ago, TrueGrit smartly observed:

That's by far the most gay Dorian image I've ever seen. The look, the way the sword is placed..that's nearly as gay as Bob in chainmail underwear, blindfolded, and on the cross. Actually, no it isn't, it's nowhere near as Gay as Bob in chainmail.

The duller knives in the drawer chimed in with "I don’t see anything gay about it."  Then I pointed out that the pic shows "a long, straight, hard, weapon placed obliquely between his legs.  Do you get it now?  It's a phallic symbol.  Only a .44 Magnum (or a dildo) in place of the sword could be more obvious."  To be explicit: Dorian the muscleman is ready to fuck you now.

These kinds of images are all over bodybuilding (Wolf above looking into the camera with torn jeans and his legs spread).  Good lord! Does this really need to be broken down and explained?  Sigh.  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 06:34:35 AM
>true dat! and he's even in a bent-over postion ready to fuck somebody doggy-style


Exactly!  Yet some here are still clueless.  As I said before, one does not take a pic like that in order to promote fitness.

Here's another example.  When this pic was posted, I suggested it was a little too pregnant with meaning; another dim bulb jumped in with the infamous line "I don’t see anything gay about it."  If one can't see what's gay about this picture it just goes to show that some jobs are just too big for some people.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jon cole on November 21, 2008, 08:05:05 AM
looks like the g4p equivalent of a tupperware reunion...


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 08:12:30 AM
I'm pretty sure this pic was first published in FLEX magazine.  What were they thinking?  ::)   

If I was Kevin or Porter I would not have posed for this picture.  I guess when you're under contract you have to do as you are told.  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: gordiano on November 21, 2008, 08:34:43 AM
The truth is there, some choose to see it and accept it, others do not. It's almost as if they don't want to admit that their little pageant is gay, in every way. Cause if they do, it makes them gay (which isn't necessarily the case).

Some choose to participate in it (competitive bbing), for the challenge it brings. Bbing IS NOT EASY. But please, there are so many reasons (which Bay, myself and others have brought up) why this whole pageant is gay. You want to turn your head away, and cover your ears while doing the "I'm not listening" routine, go for it.

Just because you choose not to accept it, does not make it ANY less gay. I give people the benefit of doubt, as I myself didn't fully see the big picture at first, and certainly not for a while. Call me naive....that was me. I can understand why some folks here get butt hurt, when the truth is brought up. Hell, years ago, I would have probably defended comp. bbing from the Bay's and Gordiano's of the world.

Let me tell you something I've learned in this life.......REALITY IS A BITCH!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: dj181 on November 21, 2008, 09:03:44 AM
yes, that office pic is defiantly reeking of gayness and it's also quite creepy :-[ and yes, Dorian's pic is reeking of gayness as well, but at least it is somewhat "artistic".... and i'm using the term "artistic" rather loosely ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: dj181 on November 21, 2008, 09:06:29 AM
and on the "gayness" of bb on shall we say "muscle sculpting", well, that's certainly a big part of it, but there's also this "insecurity issue" and it's not just limited to teenagers... just today, in fact i saw this fella with a round muscular ass and i was quite jealous ;D no, i didn't want to fuck his ass, i just realized it was better than mime and it pissed me off coz that's the first bodypart the ladies check out when they size up some fella for mating purposes 8) but, thank god, i had a prettier face than him and better arms ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: hapamuscle on November 21, 2008, 09:25:21 AM
Interesting Topic.  I guess the question where is that fine line between being a fan of bodybuilding and being attracted to men?  I applaud any hetero guy that can look at a guy and say "he's hot" or "he looks good" because they are not worried about being labeled anything and are confident in their own sexuality.  If other men couldn't tell if a another man is attractive, there would be no trends among men.

I think from a marketing perspective, they are trying to appeal many different niches.  The obvious ones are the bodybuilders and the gay muscle worshipers, but most of all they appeal to men's insecurities.  The huge ass guy holding the tires.  Hes buff, confident, sexy and strong.  People love him, idol him, and some men get into their head that that is what they need to look like to be a true man in this world. Believe it or not, the same insecurities that are flooded on women through all these images also affect men.

In most Bodybuilding/Muscle magazines, they really don't have any substance and are loaded with ads.  All the ads contain huge guys, looking tough, veins bulging out or the muscle guy with the hot woman on his side.  They are promoting a product that they probably only used for a short time and if they told you how they really got that big, your opinion of them would change.  But skinny boys like I was in my teens ran to the local GNC, buying this product, hoping that it was a miracle juice that would make me look like the huge bodybuilder. I spent hundreds of dollars on supplements.  If I would have spent the money getting big like all these guys truly did, I would have become much more bigger than I am.

Is it gay? More than likley has it gay fans.  Is it marketing? yes. Think about it, would these images be out there if they had no market value? It can't be only gay men buying into it. I do believe it is possible to be muscle obsessed without being gay because in your head, those bodybuilders are your ideal image and are what you believe will get you laid. Its like superheros and they look like superheros.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on November 21, 2008, 09:57:29 AM
I'm pretty sure this pic was first published in FLEX magazine.  What were they thinking?  ::)   

If I was Kevin or Porter I would not have posed for this picture.  I guess when you're under contract you have to do as you are told.  ;D

Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 10:04:01 AM
Muscle men in daisy dukes!  Another common (and hopelessly gay) image in this sport.

Nothing says “I’m a fvck hole for your pleasure” like daisy dukes.  Do you really think heterosexual women want to see men wearing this crap?  No.  These images are produced for gay-closeted, bi, and bicurious men. I say that because a real gay guy would not waste time with this kind of titillation; he would just cut to the chase and go straight to muscle porn (of which there is plenty to be had).


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: hapamuscle on November 21, 2008, 10:10:37 AM
Muscle men in daisy dukes!  Another common (and hopelessly gay) image in this sport.

Nothing says “I’m a fvck hole for your pleasure” like daisy dukes.  Do you really think heterosexual women want to see men wearing this crap?  No.  These images are produced for gay-closeted, bi, and bicurious men. I say that because a real gay guy would not waste time with this kind of titillation; he would just cut to the chase and go straight to muscle porn (of which there is plenty to be had).

Daisy dukes should be banned in any sport.  The only people I see wearing them anymore are old gay men who had their prime time in the 70's. 


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 21, 2008, 10:13:36 AM
Muscle men in daisy dukes!  Another common (and hopelessly gay) image in this sport.

Nothing says “I’m a fvck hole for your pleasure” like daisy dukes.  Do you really think heterosexual women want to see men wearing this crap?  No.  These images are produced for gay-closeted, bi, and bicurious men. I say that because a real gay guy would not waste time with this kind of titillation; he would just cut to the chase and go straight to muscle porn (of which there is plenty to be had).

I gotta get a pair of those to strute around in, bring them back in fashion or maybe they never wear fashionable :|


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 10:16:25 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHdxiENitfk

"I don’t see anything gay about it."  ha ha ha ha ha 



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 21, 2008, 10:16:34 AM
I'm pretty sure this pic was first published in FLEX magazine.  What were they thinking?  ::)   

If I was Kevin or Porter I would not have posed for this picture.  I guess when you're under contract you have to do as you are told.  ;D

Lol at the kevin pic, it looks like he is looking for approval to his muscle dad above.  Any the Wolf pic HAHAH the torn jeans, I only see girls wear them, that is so gay.  Total denial if people say its not.  Bay is spot on as always.

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 10:21:46 AM
"I don’t see anything gay about it."  ha ha ha ha ha   ;D



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: hapamuscle on November 21, 2008, 11:02:19 AM
"I don’t see anything gay about it."  ha ha ha ha ha   ;D



Where are you getting these pictures?  Playgirl Circa 1980?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 11:11:54 AM
Where are you getting these pictures?  Playgirl Circa 1980?

If only.  They all come from the world of bodybuilding... in other words, these images are being made and promoted for male consumption.   ::)

btw, if there is a heterosexual guy that buys videos from usamuscle.com I'd like to know who he is. 

http://www.usamuscle.com/vidclips/detail.asp?VidClipID=9718&Size=hd720&pok=1


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 21, 2008, 11:50:01 AM
wow such nice skin I wish I could like him  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 12:01:35 PM
wow such nice skin I wish I could like him  :D

Whoa there tiger.  Remember, it's all an illusion: lighting, oil, etc.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 12:03:28 PM

None of those except the Lee Haney one has been in a big mag (Ironman, Flex, MD, M&F) and I don't see what's gay about the Haney picture anyways.

what on earth is gay about these pics? 

E


Dumb and dumber!  ha ha ha ha    ;D  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 01:25:20 PM
  Bodybuilding started in Ancient Greece, where mature men over 50 would go to the gymnasiums and masturbate while watching 17 year-old youths, called ephebes at that time, wrestling naked. That's where the fetichisation of the male physique started. Wealthy, powerful Greek aristocrats would even give vases and other expensive gifts to the most good-looking boys, and make them their "bitch". There are vases from Greek art that show good-looking youth half-naked flexing their muscles to the lusting eyes of an older man. Bobybuilding is gay. Gay. Gay. Gay.

Mature men in the audience??  “Admiring” the scantily clad muscle men on stage??  While they pose and flex for your benefit??  Hmm, that sounds awfully familiar!

I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: _bruce_ on November 21, 2008, 02:22:05 PM
The gayness in BB is pretty amusing.
Those pics are heftily obvious, but it also depends on whom is looking at them.
Only thing that shocked me alittle bit, was Cutler showing his disgusting arse in his newest vid - though I doubt he was doing it to arouse other men.
On the other hand... Levrone with that Earl-stare....  watch out :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 02:29:09 PM
that pic [of Brad being felt up] is absolutely f'n disgusting. >:(

Hit a nerve did I?  The reality is, the audience is essentially the same in both pix.  :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 21, 2008, 02:34:16 PM
Why is it disgusting, looks like brad is enjoying it  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 02:52:55 PM
It's only "disgusting" if one has been in denial about who the real bodybuilding fans are.  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: gordiano on November 21, 2008, 05:37:55 PM
Mature men in the audience??  “Admiring” the scantily clad muscle men on stage??  While they pose and flex for your benefit??  Hmm, that sounds awfully familiar!

I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.  :D


 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 05:51:33 PM
Why is it disgusting, looks like brad is enjoying it  ;)

It must hurt to have your bubble burst.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 21, 2008, 08:35:09 PM
Nothing gay here  ::)

Forget that woman it's me and you daddy! :D
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/6432/0/d/img_62981223574153.jpg)

Meeting for the first time, so cute
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/6432/0/d/img_63101223574154.jpg)

Show em the goods Toney, so GAY  :)
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/6432/0/d/img_63341223574156.jpg)

And finally Chic the master of gayness, wearing a salor outfit to the Olympia Finals  ;D
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/contest_media/6432/0/d/img_63161223574155.jpg)

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 08:46:24 PM
There's nothing gay about it...  Every heterosexual guy should have this video in his library.  ::)

http://www.usamuscle.com/vidclips/detail.asp?VidClipID=537&Size=lg&pok=1


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 21, 2008, 09:04:51 PM
WOW his pecs are so thick, and love the music!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: gordiano on November 21, 2008, 09:21:53 PM
There's nothing gay about it...  Every heterosexual guy should have this video in his library.  ::)

http://www.usamuscle.com/vidclips/detail.asp?VidClipID=537&Size=lg&pok=1


Oh brother, I only watched halfway.....geez, if that's not jerk off material for gay men, I don't know what is.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 21, 2008, 11:06:09 PM
Oh brother, I only watched halfway.....geez, if that's not jerk off material for gay men, I don't know what is.


Aaron Maddron seems like a nice enough guy, but why would a self respecting straight bodybuilder make a video like that?  I think this question gets to the core of professional bodybuilding.  Assuming we can agree that these usamuscle.com type videos are being produced for men, why pump and pump yourself up--just so you can show it off to other men (male schmoes)?  This is one of the reasons why I say bodybuilding is gay: because you (the huge male bodybuilder) are deliberately cultivating the attention of other men--and not in, what most people would consider, a wholesome way.  You sculpt yourself into a piece of meat (granted an attractive piece of meat) but a piece of meat nevertheless and you do this so that other men can 'feast' on you.

This dynamic is underscored by the fact that, most often, the male fans who are paying to come see you, paying to watch your videos, buy your photos, etc. are men who are themselves not in good shape--many do not work out at all!

Something more than ego, vanity, or a desire to make money is at work here.  I have my own theory about what is going on, but it would be interesting to see some interviews or read responses from pro bodybuilders reflecting on this question—particularly since videos like that Maddron one are so common in this sport.  Since I don't expect any actual pros to respond let's hear from you getbiggers...

As always, anyone who wishes to respond anonymously may send me a private message or email; my email address is in my getbig profile.



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on November 22, 2008, 07:51:20 AM
One day in the Sex forum generated more views and responses than in week in the Z forum.  Moving this thread from Z to Sex was an upgrade. Bah ha ha ha ha ha

Doom approves.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 22, 2008, 11:21:18 AM
Gee Bay, you see gayness in everything. I suppose you think this hardcore wrestling pic looks gay too, huh? What a sick mind you've got.

Not everything.  But when I see a man shoot up with supplements in order to parade around in a thong (to music no less) while oiled up to the applause and appreciation of other men then, yes, I do see gayness.  And when these same bodybuilders make "lifestyle videos", engage in posing sessions (in private or public), sell "personal training sessions" to "clients" who do not even workout, or work as escorts on the side then, yes, I do see gayness.  I have posted images (and video) that represent all this.  You are welcome to do the same.

If you really believe I have tunnel vision, show this entire thread to your mom, dad, brother, sister, girlfriend, or boyfriend (or anyone at random) and ask them what they think.  But be warned: they may think very differently of you after you do so.  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: The ChemistV2 on November 22, 2008, 03:36:10 PM
Not everything.  But when I see a man shoot up with supplements in order to parade around in a thong (to music no less) while oiled up to the applause and appreciation of other men then, yes, I do see gayness.  And when these same bodybuilders make "lifestyle videos", engage in posing sessions (in private or public), sell "personal training sessions" to "clients" who do not even workout, or work as escorts on the side then, yes, I do see gayness.  I have posted images (and video) that represent all this.  You are welcome to do the same.

If you really believe I have tunnel vision, show this entire thread to your mom, dad, brother, sister, girlfriend, or boyfriend (or anyone at random) and ask them what they think.  But be warned: they may think very differently of you after you do so.  ::)
Well I was joking about the wrestling shot! But in all honesty, I think classifying certain imagery as gay or not depends a lot on your reference point. My father started me working out when I was 10 years old (I'm 45 now). He had stacks of all the muscle magazines and I never once had any gay thoughts looking at them. If a person isn't gay, those ideas don't generally cross their mind. For example, the Lee Haney photo you have of him in the streets of New York posing in the jeans. I remember that shot from 1984. I don't see anything gay about it.    Now, if I were a gay man, maybe I'd see it in a different light. And yes, obviously the guys that pose in those little clubs for the gay men and the gay for pay are all a reality of the sport. But there were a lot of young guys such as myself that read those magazines growing up who were inspired by the imagery and saw something powerful and heroic, and didn't envision having sex with these guys. Yes, the magazines don't want to alienate their gay audience, but their core target market has been generally straight, young males who they want to peddle their supplements to. I have been to the Mr. Olympia over 9 times since 1977, personally know Joe Weider and many of the bodybuilding hierarchy. Are there quite a few gays in the audience? Sure, but there's far more straight people.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 22, 2008, 04:09:55 PM
At 10 years old, you were probably too clueless to realize what happens behind the glossy photos.  Even many adults today, aren’t subtle enough to connect the dots in some rather pregnant images.  Just because you don’t recognize what is happening in a given photo doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.

Gordiano sums it up best.

I hear ya. For the longest time, I had no idea. There were signs, odds things. I have nothing against gays.....my issue is with this whole shit industry as a whole. It's starts with the lying magazines, then it goes to the supplement companies, and then to the competitor's themselves. It's a huge bag of shit. Everyone within it, just winks their eye at each other, and pretend nothing is going on.

You've got the competitors prostituting themselves for drugs, money, and who know what else (drug abusers, and not just anabolics, mind you). You've got crooked judges, fucking and abusing the competitors. You've got the Snake Oil salesmen, who use the huge drug abusers to sell their shit products (all the while, we're being told product X is responsible for their gains and low bf levels). The magazines who seem to always forget to mention that drugs are the BIGGEST ingredient in the bbing cocktail. Then you've got the Feds themselves, the best man in the pageant doesn't always win.

Again, for a while, I was blind to all this. I didn't believe it at first.....but now I know better. It's funny to me how in denial people can be.

That Haney picture (like the Dorian picture) is another example of the (not so) coded images in pro bodybuilding.  When that pic was posted here a couple years ago several members slammed it as being way too gay, but many clueless people had no idea what they were talking about.  Again, not everyone is equally perceptive.  So be it.  I have every reason to believe that the people who slammed that Haney photo were straight—but they were not stupid and they got the message of that photo loud and clear.

The question I posed earlier stands: why would a self respecting straight bodybuilder make a video like the one above?  And why do you think those videos are so common in this sport?  You’re not 10 years old anymore; do you really believe the answer to my question depends on your frame of reference?

If you wish to remain in a denial bubble that is your choice, but you shouldn't expect the rest of us to play along--especially when many of us know what your BB heroes are doing when they are not on stage: private posing, gay porn, etc.  If you limit yourself to magazines, you will not appreciate the irony of this photo.



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: The ChemistV2 on November 22, 2008, 04:47:00 PM
At 10 years old, you were probably too clueless to realize what happens behind the glossy photos.  Even many adults today, aren’t subtle enough to connect the dots in some rather pregnant images.  Just because you don’t recognize what is happening in a given photo doesn’t mean it isn’t happening.

Gordiano sums it up best.

That Haney picture (like the Dorian picture) is another example of the (no so) coded images in pro bodybuilding.  When that pic was posted here a couple years ago several members slammed it as being way too gay, but many clueless people had no idea what they were talking about.  Again, not everyone is equally perceptive.  So be it.  I have every reason to believe that the people who slammed that Haney photo were straight—but they were not stupid and they got the message of that photo loud and clear.

The question I posed earlier stands: why would a self respecting straight bodybuilder make a video like the one above?  And why do you think those videos are so common in this sport?  You’re not 10 years old anymore; do you really believe the answer to my question depends on your frame of reference?

If you wish to remain in a denial bubble that is your choice, but you shouldn't expect the rest of us to play along--especially when many of us know what your BB heroes are doing when they are not on stage: private posing, gay porn, etc.  If you limit yourself to magazines, you will not appreciate the irony of this photo.



Believe me, I know all about the Bruce Pattersons, the Chris Duffys, the Bob Birdsongs of the bodybuilding world. I know basically every aspect of the sport..how many drugs are used, G4p. I'm hardly Naive. All I'm saying is that when I look at a creative, artistic bodybuilding photo, I don't, neither do the majority of true bodybuilding fans who appreciate a symmetrical, scuplted, perfectly proportioned physique, see something gay about it. I'm talking about the photographic image and what it means to me and others like me. I can admire a Bob Paris photo and be inspired by it and not dwell on the reality that he's gay. Do you get what I'm saying? However, if I see a suggestive photo of a scantily clad woman, I may get sexual thoughts. That's what I mean by point of reference.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 24, 2008, 09:12:26 AM
Of course I get what your saying.  Now get what I’m saying: many of the images/videos I’ve been talking about are inherently gay—no matter what perspective one is coming from.  This is underscored by the fact that many people—straight and gay—have been taken aback by how obviously gay some of these images are.

One does not have to be sexually interested in these images to see that they are crafted to be titillating to a schmoe.  I can readily see that many of the T&A pictures of women used in film, TV, and publishing are used to titillate straight guys; you should be able to see the same thing in all these bodybuilding photos and videos ostensibly produced to “inspire” the viewer.  Any guy who can sit through more than a couple seconds of these videos (never mind buying them) is probably looking for "inspiration" of a different sort.  Speaking of which… here’s another one…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up553w7uiCY

 ::)



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 26, 2008, 11:32:39 AM
"Take it all off!!!" :D

"Oh, man!  Dreams really do come true!"  :P :P

"I'll never wash this shirt again."   ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on November 26, 2008, 01:32:12 PM
"Take it all off!!!" :D

"Oh, man!  Dreams really do come true!"  :P :P

"I'll never wash this shirt again."   ;D

did that schmoe really say all that while on the microphone?!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on November 26, 2008, 01:39:03 PM
"Take it all off!!!" :D

"Oh, man!  Dreams really do come true!"  :P :P

"I'll never wash this shirt again."   ;D


Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Doom is amused.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Earl1972 on November 26, 2008, 09:39:27 PM
I always laugh when guys look at pix like the ones below and say “I don’t see anything gay about it” because, in effect, what you are really saying is that you are not very bright.  A picture does not have to consist of two guys having sex in order for it to be gay.

Many (most) of the editors, writers, photographers, and stylists (people who set up and manage these photo shoots) are gay. This is not conjecture on my part; several of them are publicly out on gay message boards.  Who do you think they are styling and framing these photos for? Women?  Um, no.  They know who their audience is, and they know the kinds of images that generate publicity and profits.  Bodybuilding is funded by male schmoes—many of them gay, bi, or closeted. 

Learning how to weight train is something everyone can legitimately be interested in, but let’s be honest, you can learn all there is to know in a couple months (a week or two if you are serious).  Weight training for yourself is also a legitimate undertaking, but spending money to attend show after show, collecting years worth of magazines, and a library of muscle videos crosses into the gay zone.  I’m willing to bet that by the time you have made your way to getbig you already know how to train biceps, abs, legs, chest, etc.  So why would you continue to spend money on this stuff?

If you honestly think ogling heavily muscled men in thongs over and over for years on end (as so many bb fans do) is an interest of heterosexual men you are dim indeed.  As I have said in other posts connecting-the-dots is not something everyone can do.  So be it.

There are plenty of heterosexual men and women who will look at these Wolf pix and espy the gay aesthetic.  (The original Herb Ritts photo that inspired all the Wolf copycat pics is below; and yes, Ritts was a gay photographer).



you're still going on about this?  i thought "nycbull" put you in your place, and he's a gay man just like you

keep telling yourself that we all have the same sick perverted thoughts as you, if that helps you sleep better at night ::)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 27, 2008, 06:22:08 AM
you're still going on about this?  i thought "nycbull" put you in your place, and he's a gay man just like you

keep telling yourself that we all have the same sick perverted thoughts as you, if that helps you sleep better at night ::)

E

Earl in a gay thread?  What a surprise.  What kept you?   ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Earl1972 on November 27, 2008, 09:01:39 AM
Earl in a gay thread?  What a surprise.  What kept you?   ;D

here we go, anybody that disagrees with you is a gay in denial ::)


E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on December 10, 2008, 08:45:33 AM
did that schmoe really say all that while on the microphone?!

LOL  No, but I'll bet he was thinking it.  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmotel room)
Post by: BayGBM on December 10, 2008, 05:52:19 PM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on December 10, 2008, 06:00:18 PM
LOL  No, but I'll bet he was thinking it.  ;D

bwhahahah x2 that also would have been great if he said it out loud, the crowd would have loved it too!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on December 13, 2008, 05:17:06 PM
bwhahahah x2 that also would have been great if he said it out loud, the crowd would have loved it too!

Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Doom is amused.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on December 13, 2008, 05:25:37 PM
:D

Not many dots to connect there!  Bah ha ha ha ha ha


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: gordiano on December 14, 2008, 01:00:11 AM
"Take it all off!!!" :D

"Oh, man!  Dreams really do come true!"  :P :P

"I'll never wash this shirt again."   ;D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

So wrong, so true....


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on December 17, 2008, 07:24:55 PM
Muscle man in thong + walking through puffs of smoke = schmoe city.   ::)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUY_LRNL3Jo


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on December 17, 2008, 07:34:16 PM
Muscle man in thong + walking through puffs of smoke = schmoe city.   ::)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUY_LRNL3Jo

LOL love your saying schmoe city :)!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on December 17, 2008, 08:18:19 PM
Perhaps I should stop using the word “gay” and start using the word “schmoe” instead.  Within the context of bodybuilding there is very little difference between these two words, but so many here seem to fear being tagged with the gay label; schmoe somehow seems to make them feel better because they can at least admit to being a schmoe.

Bodybuilding is truly a funny sport: even the people who patronize it (attend shows/expos, buy magazines & videos, post on bb message boards, etc.) are afraid to identify themselves as “fans.”  One doesn't have to connect too many dots to see why that is.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (gay)
Post by: jtsunami on December 17, 2008, 08:32:44 PM
Perhaps I should stop using the word “gay” and start using the word “schmoe” instead.  Within the context of bodybuilding there is very little difference between these two words, but so many here seem to fear being tagged with the gay label; schmoe somehow seems to make them feel better because they can at least admit to being a schmoe.

Bodybuilding is truly a funny sport: even the people who patronize it (attend shows/expos, buy magazines & videos, post on bb message boards, etc.) are afraid to identify themselves as “fans.”  One doesn't have to connect too many dots to see why that is.  :D


agree


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Tre on December 29, 2008, 12:13:24 PM
Perhaps I should stop using the word “gay” and start using the word “schmoe” instead.  Within the context of bodybuilding there is very little difference between these two words, but so many here seem to fear being tagged with the gay label; schmoe somehow seems to make them feel better because they can at least admit to being a schmoe.

Bodybuilding is truly a funny sport: even the people who patronize it (attend shows/expos, buy magazines & videos, post on bb message boards, etc.) are afraid to identify themselves as “fans.”  One doesn't have to connect too many dots to see why that is.  :D


QFT.



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 04, 2009, 06:45:25 PM
Public Schmoe-tastic muscle worship! :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 09, 2009, 09:23:45 AM
Another Herb Ritts inspired photo.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on January 09, 2009, 01:10:45 PM
Another Herb Ritts inspired photo.  :D
Bob Chick could argue that is aimed at a heterosexual audience  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on January 09, 2009, 01:19:40 PM
Bob Chick could argue that is aimed at a heterosexual audience  :D

x2


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 09, 2009, 02:26:43 PM
Bob Chick could argue that is aimed at a heterosexual audience  :D

LOL this pic is even more schmoe centric than the other ones because the tire holding bodybuilder (Jeff Schwartzer) is not wearing jeans or shorts but posing trunks!  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on January 10, 2009, 08:46:45 AM
Now that BEEFYHEAVYWEIGHT has spilled the beans on so many of your bodybuilding heroes who have done G4P or escorted; and now that we know our inked friend is doing (gay) porn http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=102189.msg3383209#msg3383209 does anyone still want to challenge my assertion that it is not a big leap to go from the BB stage to porn/escorting? 


No. 

Compete in bodybuilding shows...  Check
Rent yourself out to dudes on rentboy.com...  Check
Appear in gay porn films...  Check
Get engaged to your girlfriend...  Check

Describe your sexual orientation as “straight but with a curve.”

Bah ha ha ha ha ha  Doom is amused.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on January 10, 2009, 10:52:53 AM
lol yea that guy is gay or something weird is going on.

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on January 10, 2009, 11:17:49 AM
Bah ha ha ha ha

http://queerpornnation.com/archives/2008/11/13/the-real-titus/


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: gordiano on January 11, 2009, 07:58:05 PM
Bay, someone just posted this shot on the G & O......thought you'd get a kick out of it:


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=257507.0;attach=298439;image)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 12, 2009, 03:43:33 AM
Bay, someone just posted this shot on the G & O......thought you'd get a kick out of it:


Ha ha ha  that pic is schmoe-tastic!  This is probably the real pose they wanted to strike (below) but doing so would have been too obvious!  ;D

You can bet there are other photos of Chris from that photo shoot with the snake that were not published or circulated.  Just remember "it's only gay if you want it to be gay."  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 17, 2009, 06:26:45 PM
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on January 17, 2009, 08:31:34 PM
;D

very hot pic


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 20, 2009, 01:44:33 AM
"It's only gay if you want it to be gay" . . . right?  Wrong!  It's gay! ;D

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=259471.0


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on January 20, 2009, 01:44:34 PM
"It's only gay if you want it to be gay" . . . right?  Wrong!  It's gay! ;D

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=259471.0


LOL so true bay so true...


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 20, 2009, 02:59:19 PM
"It's only gay if you want it to be gay" . . . right?  Wrong!  It's gay! ;D

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=259471.0



these pics are definitely gay

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: parsnip1965 on January 20, 2009, 03:45:39 PM
Point well made.  Thanks for all the great pictures :-)

Seriously, a lot of guys, me included, are basically straight but have some sort of a curve.  Nothing wrong with that.  Bodybuilding magazines are a legit-looking way to indulge the curved part.

Of course, I'm old enough and smart enough to know who I am.  Try that idea out on some young meathead, and you may get an argument or a fight, but not from me.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 20, 2009, 09:08:50 PM
Point well made.  Thanks for all the great pictures :-)

Seriously, a lot of guys, me included, are basically straight but have some sort of a curve.  Nothing wrong with that.  Bodybuilding magazines are a legit-looking way to indulge the curved part.

Of course, I'm old enough and smart enough to know who I am.  Try that idea out on some young meathead, and you may get an argument or a fight, but not from me.

That's as good a way to put it as any other; I'll buy that.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Tombo on January 24, 2009, 04:34:12 AM
i troll this shit cos im curious, not gay, but i do wonder why you like to point the finger so much, i opened a bodybuilding mag 4 years ago and thought 'whoa' those guys are fucking huge and i want to aspire somewhere along that spectrum and off i went, but no, i come onto getbig.com after 6 months and ive got people trying to convince me im gay. fuck you baygbm.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 24, 2009, 08:39:52 AM
Let me put it this way, when a big guy calls me a “fag” in public (or online) then comes begging to suck my dick in private something is not right.  And, yes, this has happened to me more than once.

If you want to work out and get huge then, by all means, hit the gym and do so.  More power to you.  But does one need to ogle huge muscle men oiled up in thongs (in magazines, on stage, on video) and pay for the privilege of doing so—for years on end in order to get in shape?  Let’s be real:  if you are serious about it, you can learn everything there is to know about training in one week. You can learn everything there is to know about nutrition in two or three weeks.  Many fans who patronize the sport of bodybuilding are not doing it because they want to get in shape.  Just look at the audience at any BB show; as Gordiano has pointed out, “you ALWAYS have men there who DO NOT EVEN WORK OUT! (wtf do you think they are there for?)”

Many of the ostensibly straight muscle men you admire are engaged in some rather questionable behaviors; and some will even tell you they are “forced” to do it. ::)

Buying a magazine, for example, once or twice = curious.  Coming back 10, 20, or 30, times = more than curious.  It equals schmoe.  Tim C described his sexual orientation as “straight… but with a curve.”  That description would seem to apply to a lot of BB fans.

If you are not attracted to men then you have no cause to worry about what some anonymous guy on the internet is pointing fingers at.  By the way, I’m not pointing fingers at any individual; I’m pointing it at behavior.  If your behavior is not consistent with what I’m pointing at, then my comments needn’t concern you.  If you do see yourself in the behaviors I describe, am I really the one you have a problem with?



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Tombo on January 24, 2009, 03:31:47 PM
at least you explained yourself.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 26, 2009, 05:29:20 PM
When is the last time you touched another man's bare butt cheek in public?  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on January 26, 2009, 05:33:07 PM
wbahhahaha I haven't but would like to :)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on February 10, 2009, 01:14:28 PM
Jay can grope my pecs anyday! :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 03, 2009, 09:54:05 AM
I have never really liked pictures of the bodies of older men even though I am over 60 myself now. Mind you I have never worked out in my life as my involvement in bodybuilding has been restricted to photography.  I much prefer the aesthetics of a younger man.
So to ask me which is better, Youngblood or Cicherillo, is just like asking me if I prefer dogshite or pigshite on my shoe. I prefer neither dear boys.  ;)


Remember this post?  Even I thought it was extremely bizarre.  A 60 year old man (I assume) who has never been interested in working out, but likes to take photos of “younger” men and specifically rejects 40 something guys as too old.  Huh?  If you are over 60 how can you consider someone who is twenty years younger than you to be too old?  And what does that make you? ???

It seems as if there are A LOT of people like this “involved” in bodybuilding.  Even kiwiol here has said that he is not interested in sports or his own athleticism/physique.  These people spend their time and money for the chance to look at/be around these guys yet have no interest in working out themselves...?

This is beyone schmoe; this is downright creepy.  :-\



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 04, 2009, 08:00:02 AM
The schmoeness never ends!

http://www.cafepress.com/musclephotos.51764465

Remember, he wouldn't be selling if there wasn't an audience for it.  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Hulkster on March 07, 2009, 09:25:47 AM
Jay can grope my pecs anyday! :D

hahaha that pic is hilarious


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: gordiano on March 07, 2009, 11:21:00 PM

Remember this post?  Even I thought it was extremely bizarre.  A 60 year old man (I assume) who has never been interested in working out, but likes to take photos of “younger” men and specifically rejects 40 something guys as too old.  Huh?  If you are over 60 how can you consider someone who is twenty years younger than you to be too old?  And what does that make you? ???

It seems as if there are A LOT of people like this “involved” in bodybuilding.  Even kiwiol here has said that he is not interested in sports or his own athleticism/physique.  These people spend their time and money for the chance to look at/be around these guys yet have no interest in working out themselves...?

This is beyone schmoe; this is downright creepy.  :-\



You're right...it is.  :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 06, 2009, 07:04:47 PM
"Make me an offer..."   ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 11, 2009, 09:50:21 PM
Jason gets a blow job :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: bodybuildermdpitt on April 17, 2009, 04:43:53 AM
BayGBM you make a lot of good points, but who really cares?? Bodybuilding has a large gay following, there is no denying that. As a result, as a pro, you have to cultivate to that crowd. In fact, it is probably safe to say that there are more gay bodybuilders than straight ones. But who really cares??? I can't believe that people are so homophobic that this actually bothers them. The part of this that really bothers me, is this overt sexualization of this sport. If you are a professional athlete, you should not be participating in prostitution and porn, regardless of the gender you are trying to appeal to. Just my two cents. 


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 17, 2009, 06:15:18 AM
You ask the question “who cares?”  Apparently a lot of the participants (pros and casual gymrats) care.  Despite all the evidence, they bend over backwards to deny that there is anything gay about bodybuilding, some are even aggressively homophobic, still others insist they are pumping up in order to attract women.  Some here have even claimed that all the gayness around this sport is simply a figment of my imagination.  “I’ve been involved in BB or 25 years and have never seen anything like you describe...”

I find all of this very amusing.

Some studies have suggested that on average men (unlike women) have a sexual thought at least once every two minutes.  I initially balked when I first heard this claim, but I have come to accept it as true.  With all these sexual currents running through our thoughts those of us in this sport are ogling huge muscle men in thongs posing to music for our benefit.  Many of the pros and gymrats are risking their health—not for a huge paycheck, not to support a family.  They are doing it simply to “look good” (to other men).

On the fan side, you have guys (often who do not even work out) spending money to fly across the country to attend BB shows, buying a library of muscle videos, magazines, and autographed photos of their muscle heroes yet many will insist that there is nothing gay about it.  These are not the undertakings of rational heterosexual men, they are the undertakings of a schmoe.  And as we all know "schmoe" is just a euphemism for...

Do I even have to finish that sentence?  Again, as an out gay man, I find this all very amusing.  :D



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: bodybuildermdpitt on April 17, 2009, 07:39:04 AM
On a side note, this concept of gay and straight actually is a mute point, since people's sexual preference is note nearly as black and white as people portray it to be. When I was in medical school, I completed a psych rotation, and I worked with an addiction specialist, who also handled sexual addiction. Hey actually gave a lecture entitled "Everyone is a Fag," obviously a tongue in cheek title to rile up emotions and to provoke thoughts. If you were to randomly test people on sexual preference, just about every individual has some preference for the same sex. And these preferences can be graded. So nobody is actually gay or straight, they would prefer one sex, but are also undeniably somewhat aroused by the other. This level of arousal is low enough that individuals will not act out on it, unless circumstances change (jail etc).



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 17, 2009, 09:56:46 AM
On a side note, this concept of gay and straight actually is a mute point, since people's sexual preference is note nearly as black and white as people portray it to be. When I was in medical school, I completed a psych rotation, and I worked with an addiction specialist, who also handled sexual addiction. Hey actually gave a lecture entitled "Everyone is a Fag," obviously a tongue in cheek title to rile up emotions and to provoke thoughts. If you were to randomly test people on sexual preference, just about every individual has some preference for the same sex. And these preferences can be graded. So nobody is actually gay or straight, they would prefer one sex, but are also undeniably somewhat aroused by the other. This level of arousal is low enough that individuals will not act out on it, unless circumstances change (jail etc).

Yes.  We discussed this sexual continuum previously in the homo thread http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=20939.0


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 22, 2009, 05:44:58 AM
I get the feeling he is available or private posing.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on April 22, 2009, 12:16:19 PM
I get the feeling his is available or private posing.  :D

yummy, what a mountain of muscle just love his tie ins to his big cannon I can image licking from his pecs all the way down to taking that slong in my mouth.

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: gordiano on April 24, 2009, 12:53:55 AM
Seriously.....what's the deal with this shot? Is he not aware he's showing? Was he called to this event last minute, thus didn't have time to shave? Perhaps he was asked to pose, last second and borrowed someone else's x-small thong?

I mean really....what's going on here? I'm not privy to these things....is he just advertising for the schmoes? Bay, is this some kind of "secret" code?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=248135.0;attach=316057;image)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 24, 2009, 05:47:09 AM
We've all been had.  It was an internet hoax.  Apparently, this is the real photo.  :-*


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 24, 2009, 05:47:51 AM
haha, thanks fo clearing that up, but the photoshop still shows that we have a problem here....

No one even considered it to be fake, everyone would think it could happen.

So true.  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: gordiano on April 24, 2009, 12:43:08 PM
We've all been had.  It was an internet hoax.  Apparently, this is the real photo.  :-*

Not much of a difference anyways..... :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 24, 2009, 01:35:45 PM
Not much of a difference anyways..... :-\

LOL Right again.  :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on April 30, 2009, 07:10:09 PM

Remember this post?  Even I thought it was extremely bizarre.  A 60 year old man (I assume) who has never been interested in working out, but likes to take photos of “younger” men and specifically rejects 40 something guys as too old.  Huh?  If you are over 60 how can you consider someone who is twenty years younger than you to be too old?  And what does that make you? ???

It seems as if there are A LOT of people like this “involved” in bodybuilding.  Even kiwiol here has said that he is not interested in sports or his own athleticism/physique.  These people spend their time and money for the chance to look at/be around these guys yet have no interest in working out themselves...?

This is beyone schmoe; this is downright creepy.  :-\



Makes you wonder who else is trolling this site... reading but almost never posting.  Ba ha ha ha ah ha


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 02, 2009, 08:18:15 AM
Need I say more? ???

ha ha ha ha ha ha


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on May 03, 2009, 01:11:09 AM
Need I say more? ???

ha ha ha ha ha ha
Its only gay if you want it to be


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on May 03, 2009, 04:36:14 PM
Need I say more? ???

ha ha ha ha ha ha

wowow is that craig?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Ex Coelis on May 09, 2009, 05:56:19 PM
The schmoeness never ends!

http://www.cafepress.com/musclephotos.51764465

Remember, he wouldn't be selling if there wasn't an audience for it.  ::)

"Perfect for dressing up any wall, this is the perfect size for maximum visual impact, or instantly creating a theme for a room. Images look great on this high-quality poster, printed on heavyweight 7 mil semi-gloss paper using superior dye inks. Treat yourself or give as a gift"

 ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Patricku9 on May 09, 2009, 06:32:52 PM
that looks like a prison strip search. :'(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on May 10, 2009, 07:27:53 PM
that looks like a prison strip search. :'(
it's bring back memories for you? ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 25, 2009, 02:18:58 PM
Wonder Twin powers... Activate!  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Beefjake on May 26, 2009, 11:36:50 AM
That pic of Haney with the steam.

It doesn't look gay to my eye.
It looks 1980's. Maybe the biggest difference is that his fly is zipped and belt isn't hanging? And that he is doing a basic BB pose and only that.

Good thread, glad that I finally cheked it.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 26, 2009, 05:24:19 PM
That pic of Haney with the steam.

It doesn't look gay to my eye.
It looks 1980's. Maybe the biggest difference is that his fly is zipped and belt isn't hanging? And that he is doing a basic BB pose and only that.

Good thread, glad that I finally cheked it.

Fair enough.  As I said before, not every one is equally perceptive, but when that Haney pic was first posted here (not by me) several years ago it was roundly attacked by many people as being way too gay . . . those of you who were around back then will remember that episode.  It was very amusing.  :D

I'm not going to break down the Haney pic as I did the Wolf and Yates pix, but consider my posts on the latter two lessons in exegesis.  If you learn that lesson and and apply it to the Haney pic, it will be painfully obvious why that pic is hopelessly gay. ::)




Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 26, 2009, 05:26:21 PM
lol! how could md possibly deny this is blatant homosexual photography....has nothing to do with bodybuilding at all...

Ha ha ha ha ;D



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Beefjake on May 27, 2009, 12:40:53 PM
Fair enough. 
...

Ok.
Still I'd say that time does that to some pictures. Somethings that were totally cool in the '80s ( or '70s, '60s ) look totally gay now.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 27, 2009, 05:01:37 PM
Ok.
Still I'd say that time does that to some pictures. Somethings that were totally cool in the '80s ( or '70s, '60s ) look totally gay now.

If you say so...  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: gordiano on May 28, 2009, 01:24:26 AM
If you say so...  :D

Oh yeah.....I can totally see how that would only be gay NOW......
















 ::) ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on May 28, 2009, 01:29:27 AM
If you say so...  :D
hahaha his cock and balls are pretty much on his head  :D


and thats not gay! LOL how does one even get up there without "contact"


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 29, 2009, 06:26:35 AM
It's only gay if you want it to be gay, right? :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on May 29, 2009, 07:07:46 PM
It's only gay if you want it to be gay, right? :D

lol I wouldn't even want to stand next to that guy if I didn't know him well completely naked like that, that is so gay.

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on June 28, 2009, 12:07:56 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=287654.0;attach=327674;image)

"We just ended up like this"


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on June 28, 2009, 02:10:10 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=287654.0;attach=327674;image)

"We just ended up like this"

i wonder if they work out like that regularly in gym, no shirts, touching each other in between sets, I would join that gym ASAP!   :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on June 28, 2009, 06:26:24 PM
i wonder if they work out like that regularly in gym, no shirts, touching each other in between sets, I would join that gym ASAP!   :D
i bet you would :-X


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 30, 2009, 11:59:08 AM
Bay,

You were right, I was wrong and sincerely apologize for doubting that bodybuilding attracts a lot of closet homosexuals. After reading the Kevin Levrone does triceps thread it's clear you were speaking from expertise and wisdom and I was speaking from ignorance and denial. It was just hard accepting that an activity/lifestyle which has turned my life around so much could be trivialized to nothing more than sexual fantasies by gays. It pretty much makes sense as I find fitness chicks hot and don't typically consider how much work they put in to maintain their bodies.

I shouldn't have doubted your wisdom, honesty and experience on this matter and apologize once again.

Jake

Apology accepted. ;D

For future reference, the next time you see heavily muscled men in thongs posing and prancing for an audience of cheering men who pay $$ for the privilege of watching--it's gay.  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 01, 2009, 09:30:08 AM
Slow motion... cheesy porn music... repetitious, angled shots... Connect the dots, my friends.  The comments attached to this video are so funny!  :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyfLpVw-Hm0

"I went from unzipping to blowing in 52 sec. And I'm veeeery picky." --mrkmuscle

"I nutted all over the place when he hit that most muscular shot....replayed 20 minutes later, nutted again." --muslador21


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on July 01, 2009, 05:41:18 PM
Slow motion... cheesy porn music... repetitious, angled shots... Connect the dots, my friends.  The comments attached to this video are so funny!  :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyfLpVw-Hm0

"I went from unzipping to blowing in 52 sec. And I'm veeeery picky." --mrkmuscle

"I nutted all over the place when he hit that most muscular shot....replayed 20 minutes later, nutted again." --muslador21



god that is pure comedy!!!!!!!!!! LOL great phrases  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 01, 2009, 06:11:18 PM
It's only gay if you want it to be gay, right? :D
i think it is only gay if you get a boner  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on July 01, 2009, 11:28:10 PM
i think it is only gay if you get a boner  ;D

or if you watch the whole clip... ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on July 02, 2009, 07:59:03 AM
Slow motion... cheesy porn music... repetitious, angled shots... Connect the dots, my friends.  The comments attached to this video are so funny!  :D

"I went from unzipping to blowing in 52 sec. And I'm veeeery picky." --mrkmuscle

"I nutted all over the place when he hit that most muscular shot....replayed 20 minutes later, nutted again." --muslador21



Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha  Doom is amused.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on July 02, 2009, 08:21:01 AM
Slow motion... cheesy porn music... repetitious, angled shots... Connect the dots, my friends.  The comments attached to this video are so funny!  :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyfLpVw-Hm0

"I went from unzipping to blowing in 52 sec. And I'm veeeery picky." --mrkmuscle

"I nutted all over the place when he hit that most muscular shot....replayed 20 minutes later, nutted again." --muslador21


One of my all-time favourites, no doubt.  :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 17, 2009, 06:49:45 AM
Bodybuilding?  Gay?  Who knew? ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Ex Coelis on July 17, 2009, 07:33:37 AM
(http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo324/Tyrol3/fotos_aaron_baker_131.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 17, 2009, 12:40:37 PM
Bodybuilding?  Gay?  Who knew? ;D
angels are gay now? ???


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 17, 2009, 01:01:29 PM
angels are gay now? ???

I am no expert on heavenly hosts, but I am on expert on all things gay and this image is gay!  But you do not have to take my word for it.  Print out this image,  show it to your friends, family, or coworkers and ask them what words come to mind when they look at it.  Better yet, tell them you admire this image and see how they react.  Angels are things to be admired, right?  If that is true, your friends and family should be happy to know you identify with what this image represents.

Maybe you cannot connect the dots . . . but I bet your friends and family could.  Of course, you would never engage in the exercise I propose because you know how your friends, family, and coworkers would react.  All of which suggest that you can connect the dots . . . you simply choose not to.  Behold the power of denial. ::)

btw, did you know that according to tradition angels are neither male nor female?  They are genderless!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Ex Coelis on July 17, 2009, 02:32:57 PM
I am no expert on heavenly hosts, but I am on expert on all things gay and this image is gay!  But you do not have to take my word for it.  Print out this image,  show it to your friends, family, or coworkers and ask them what words come to mind when they look at it.  Better yet, tell them you admire this image and see how they react.  Angels are things to be admired, right?  If that is true, your friends and family should be happy to know you identify with what this image represents.

Maybe you cannot connect the dots . . . but I bet your friends and family could.  Of course, you would never engage in the exercise I propose because you know how your friends, family, and coworkers would react.  All of which suggest that you can connect the dots . . . you simply choose not to.  Behold the power of denial. ::)

that's not the white party


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Parker on July 17, 2009, 03:23:12 PM
I am no expert on heavenly hosts, but I am on expert on all things gay and this image is gay!  But you do not have to take my word for it.  Print out this image,  show it to your friends, family, or coworkers and ask them what words come to mind when they look at it.  Better yet, tell them you admire this image and see how they react.  Angels are things to be admired, right?  If that is true, your friends and family should be happy to know you identify with what this image represents.

Maybe you cannot connect the dots . . . but I bet your friends and family could.  Of course, you would never engage in the exercise I propose because you know how your friends, family, and coworkers would react.  All of which suggest that you can connect the dots . . . you simply choose not to.  Behold the power of denial. ::)

He has a thing for comicbook heros..that image I can only explain him as being the Arch-Angel...But it is odd   


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 17, 2009, 03:39:46 PM
He has a thing for comicbook heros..that image I can only explain him as being the Arch-Angel...But it is odd   

"Odd" as in "queer"?  Ok. I'll buy that.  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Ex Coelis on July 17, 2009, 04:28:51 PM
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2007/drobson304h.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 17, 2009, 05:46:03 PM
What the hell kind of work out is this?  ???


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Ex Coelis on July 17, 2009, 08:26:14 PM
What the hell kind of work out is this?  ???

LOL wtf  ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 17, 2009, 10:43:18 PM
I am no expert on heavenly hosts, but I am on expert on all things gay and this image is gay!  But you do not have to take my word for it.  Print out this image,  show it to your friends, family, or coworkers and ask them what words come to mind when they look at it.  Better yet, tell them you admire this image and see how they react.  Angels are things to be admired, right?  If that is true, your friends and family should be happy to know you identify with what this image represents.

Maybe you cannot connect the dots . . . but I bet your friends and family could.  Of course, you would never engage in the exercise I propose because you know how your friends, family, and coworkers would react.  All of which suggest that you can connect the dots . . . you simply choose not to.  Behold the power of denial. ::)

btw, did you know that according to tradition angels are neither male nor female?  They are genderless!
point is, i see that pic and see a built guy in a horrific Halloween costume. You see that pic and want the dude to fuck you. different perceptions. anyway, angel are not to be "admired". That's what got the devil a do-not-pass-go card. ;D
FYI, i have no problem with gay people. I even have some gay friends :o. 


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 18, 2009, 06:38:05 AM
point is, i see that pic and see a built guy in a horrific Halloween costume. You see that pic and want the dude to fuck you. different perceptions. anyway, angel are not to be "admired". That's what got the devil a do-not-pass-go card. ;D
FYI, i have no problem with gay people. I even have some gay friends :o. 

I'm willing to bet this pic was not taken on Halloween. ::)

As I said, you don't have to take my word for it that the pic is gay.  Show it to your friends & family and see how they react... if you dare.  When they tell you it's gay you can tell them they only see it that way because they want the dude to fuck them.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 18, 2009, 02:55:07 PM
I'm willing to bet this pic was not taken on Halloween. ::)

As I said, you don't have to take my word for it that the pic is gay.  Show it to your friends & family and see how they react... if you dare.  When they tell you it's gay you can tell them they only see it that way because they want the dude to fuck them.
Why are you insisting that i show that pic to my family and friends? I'm man enough to make up my own mind.  ::) ::)
True, that some of these pics do have an erotic or/and gay theme to them. IMO this one doesn't. Even tho i did LOL when you first posted it.
anyway,stop denying that you want that dude in the pic to top you, bay.  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 18, 2009, 05:04:44 PM
Why are you insisting that i show that pic to my family and friends? I'm man enough to make up my own mind.  ::) ::)
True, that some of these pics do have an erotic or/and gay theme to them. IMO this one doesn't. Even tho i did LOL when you first posted it.
anyway,stop denying that you want that dude in the pic to top you, bay.  ;D

This thread is about coded, and not so coded, gay images in bodybuilding.  I never said anything about wanting or not wanting that guy to top me.  You are the one who is apparently fantasizing about that.  Everyone here can draw their own conclusions as to why that is. ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on July 18, 2009, 08:11:43 PM
This thread is about coded, and not so coded, gay images in bodybuilding.  I never said anything about wanting or not wanting that guy top me.  You are the one who is apparently fantasizing about that.  Everyone here can draw their own conclusions as to why that is. ::)

Bah ha ha ha ha ha


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on July 18, 2009, 08:52:24 PM
lol that pic of ronnie is about as gay as it gets, a man with wings?  Maybe I am wrong but I always have thought of angels as woman not men :) 

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 18, 2009, 11:35:49 PM
This thread is about coded, and not so coded, gay images in bodybuilding.  I never said anything about wanting or not wanting that guy top me.  You are the one who is apparently fantasizing about that.  Everyone here can draw their own conclusions as to why that is. ::)
so you're gay but don't have gay sex? isn't that a given. ::) poor little guy. so confused. :-\
BTW, i love me some bitches and i am man enough to said i fantasize about them all the time.  ;)hell, i just got back from a date, and i was fantasizing about her and other chicks though out the date. You're the one that is afraid to said that you fantasize about men.  :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on July 19, 2009, 12:02:04 AM
lol that pic of ronnie is about as gay as it gets, a man with wings?  Maybe I am wrong but I always have thought of angels as woman not men :) 

jt
not in Htexan's non-gay dreams  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 19, 2009, 12:05:37 AM
not in Htexan's non-gay dreams  :D
lol


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on October 01, 2009, 06:27:19 PM
Behold the pageantry! ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on October 03, 2009, 03:22:39 PM
Music + muscle men + thongs + posing for other men + confetti = gay.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on December 20, 2009, 06:52:18 AM
Variations on a theme...  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 20, 2009, 08:21:07 AM
Variations on a theme...  :D

Tony is one of my favourites!  :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on December 21, 2009, 01:41:38 AM
Variations on a theme...  :D
i agree, those are some really gay rims. ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: rockyfortune on December 23, 2009, 04:31:28 AM
this is the funniest fucking thread...if there is an expert on what is gay...it's Bay---i wonder how bob defends his fruity chainmail pic!?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on December 23, 2009, 08:54:48 AM
this is the funniest fucking thread...if there is an expert on what is gay...it's Bay---i wonder how bob defends his fruity chainmail pic!?



;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 23, 2009, 09:41:33 AM
 :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 23, 2009, 12:47:05 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LGOG3suSwg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NENku49pxeQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5CdKt1tMy8

Daniele Seccarecci, schmoe-tastic!  :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 23, 2009, 12:52:24 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg7m7qmeXCo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tStiQwa8EFc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytIjOKEYh4I

 :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 23, 2009, 01:07:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snlT5YDLx8o

Thomas Benagli has been of my favourites for a long time.  :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 25, 2009, 09:41:35 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPES0n4u1Rk

Mike Lackner, 1998 NPC Collegiate National Championships, Heavyweight winner   


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on December 30, 2009, 07:12:09 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiNed7EItD0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92l2l8Wm57c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBIUhqQPXs4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep3XtOXwIW0


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 01, 2010, 05:12:52 AM
Sir:

Remember, this thread is about coded, and not so coded, gay images in bodybuilding; it is not a gratuitous musclefest.  ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3zeLJuuCQM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmFwXaylOdY



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 26, 2010, 05:05:50 PM
…but admiring men's physique is gay, no matter how hard you try to make it hetero, sorry.
 


the amount of repressed homosexual tendencies in this thread is baffling….

And just to make it clear, anyone on here who posts pics of himself and want his "physique" and "lines" to be "judged" by other men, or who starts threads about how "amazing" a bodybuilder from 40 years ago was in his posing routine, is a fag in denial, period. You do not admire other men bodies without being a fag. 



You guys are finally connecting the dots . . .  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 26, 2010, 06:03:25 PM
so when a guy looks at brad pitt in "fight club" and wished he looked that way, he's gay?

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 28, 2010, 10:30:10 PM
The famous Bill Grant "Hands" video. Unusual and unique. Bill is a mass of hard muscles, cuts, and veins as he ripples and flexes under the oiling and massaging hands . . .  (of anonymous men)!    :D

http://www.gmv.com.au/default.asp?pageid=products&template=PRODUCTCAT&catid=30&prodid=1535&site=1


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 29, 2010, 12:32:22 PM
so when a guy looks at brad pitt in "fight club" and wished he looked that way, he's gay?

E

no response

maybe bay realizes how ridiculous his logic is :D

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on January 29, 2010, 03:34:41 PM
no response

maybe bay realizes how ridiculous his logic is :D

E

You just can't tear yourself away from this thread, can you?  :P

Here you go.  :P :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on January 29, 2010, 03:39:24 PM
no response

maybe bay realizes how ridiculous his logic is :D

E

Earl in a gay thread?  What a surprise.  What kept you?   ;D

 :P :P :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Sir Humphrey on January 29, 2010, 03:57:44 PM
no response

maybe bay realizes how ridiculous his logic is :D

E

Tell us how "un-gay" this guest posing routine is.  :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCIB1R-Ziss

Some comments on Youtube:

He's so beautiful and sexy. Thanks for posting.

Damn I wish I had been the cameraman. I would have used the zoom.

 


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 29, 2010, 04:27:07 PM
You just can't tear yourself away from this thread, can you?  :P

Here you go.  :P :P


predictable response

i've been subscribed to it since it started, it's interesting :)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 29, 2010, 04:30:43 PM
Tell us how "un-gay" this guest posing routine is.  :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCIB1R-Ziss

Some comments on Youtube:

He's so beautiful and sexy. Thanks for posting.

Damn I wish I had been the cameraman. I would have used the zoom.

 

just because something can attract a gay audience doesn't make it gay

read the comments here, I guess baywatch is gay

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0Z_kCTZ4iA

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 29, 2010, 04:37:26 PM
is football gay?

(http://rodonline.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c6d4753ef0120a5054262970b-400wi)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: UPINTHEMGUTS on January 29, 2010, 04:56:56 PM
i'm defintely guilty of entering this thread. But before I did, I noticed, 'Earl1972' had entered into the homo discussion(you can't not notice this on Getbig..... So I ask myself, " What in the world did Earl have to possibly debate in a homo-only(schome)thread.


I am shocked at the fact that Earl has even had the inclination to want to debate a schome on homo turf. Fuckin' fag alert!!!!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 29, 2010, 05:04:35 PM
i'm defintely guilty of entering this thread. But before I did, I noticed, 'Earl1972' had entered into the homo discussion. So I ask myself, " What in the world did Earl have to possibly debate in a homo-only(schome thread).


I am shocked at the fact that Earl has even had the inclination to want to debate a schome on homo turf.

did you read my posts?

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 29, 2010, 05:40:31 PM
i'm defintely guilty of entering this thread. But before I did, I noticed, 'Earl1972' had entered into the homo discussion(you can't not notice this on Getbig..... So I ask myself, " What in the world did Earl have to possibly debate in a homo-only(schome)thread.


I am shocked at the fact that Earl has even had the inclination to want to debate a schome on homo turf. Fuckin' fag alert!!!!

 ;)



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on January 29, 2010, 05:55:27 PM

 ;)



"uminthemguts" is slang for plowing another man, along with being my long time nemesis on getbig, of course he will be against me

now why don't you answer my questions? 

E



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on February 09, 2010, 11:46:20 AM
You dont spend hours a day "admiring", "detailing" pictures of other tong wearing muscle men  without being a fag. And if you werent one in the first place, this kind of "hobby" will get you there eventually.


uberman connecting the dots!  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on February 11, 2010, 08:38:27 PM
(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kxm525HRD41qa49tx.jpg)
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on February 15, 2010, 07:42:18 AM
Because the majority of older men who "love" the sport are gay schmoes. :-\

Face it, bodybuilding is gay. :-X

PS:  Bodybuilding isnt a sport.

QFT


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on February 24, 2010, 12:34:59 PM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on February 24, 2010, 12:46:29 PM
 :D

(http://s11.allstarpics.net/images/orig/y/n/ynyz8s4q37k6736s.jpg)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 14, 2010, 07:56:17 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on March 14, 2010, 09:37:22 AM
Here's one of the newer ones, started last year with Kai awe inspiring the governor and making Lonnie speechless after his routine and it continued this year, who only knows what happens behind closed doors for some $$ while the governor is getting some extra entertainment. 


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 19, 2010, 07:30:52 AM
Nothing gay to see here... move along.  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on April 20, 2010, 11:12:22 AM
boxing gay?  who knew ::)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_lLsdaCVk3Kk/R-r0ZvrQ8aI/AAAAAAAAOv8/N6BtZzL0L4M/WladimirVitaliKlitschko05.jpg)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 21, 2010, 06:47:21 AM
Nothing gay to see here... move along. ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on April 21, 2010, 04:37:24 PM
lol good ole trey, gotta wonder what he is doing behind the scenes now that his contract was taken away.



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 22, 2010, 04:08:15 PM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 06, 2010, 03:50:10 PM
Let's see: a ring on each hand, a watch, a bracelet and an earring, bulging muscles and tight shirt, looks like he got his nails done too.  Connect the dots . . .  ::)

Not that there is anything wrong with that.  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on June 06, 2010, 04:03:28 PM
Let's see: a ring on each hand, a watch, a bracelet and an earring, bulging muscles and tight shirt, looks like he got his nails done too.  Connect the dots . . .  ::)

Not that there is anything wrong with that.  ;)
louis vuitton man purse too


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 06, 2010, 04:26:10 PM
louis vuitton man purse too

OMG!  LOL! He is definitely being kept!  It's good to have a schmoe/daddy!  ;D


Bah ha ha ha ha ha ha


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on June 06, 2010, 05:43:36 PM
Let's see: a ring on each hand, a watch, a bracelet and an earring, bulging muscles and tight shirt, looks like he got his nails done too.  Connect the dots . . .  ::)

Not that there is anything wrong with that.  ;)

louis vuitton man purse too

It's true what they say, "A picture is worth a thousand words..."  Bah ha ha ha ha ha

Doom is amused.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on June 06, 2010, 06:59:04 PM
OMG!  LOL! He is definitely being kept!  It's good to have a schmoe/daddy!  ;D

HAHAHA I never even saw that stuff the first time I looked at that picture, great find Bay!!!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 06, 2010, 07:46:19 PM
HAHAHA I never even saw that stuff the first time I looked at that picture, great find Bay!!!

You, my friend, are not connecting... the... dots...!  Such pregnant photos are very common in the world of bodybuilding.  Do not just "look" at the photos.  "See" them.  Here is your homework assignment: start back on page 1 of this thread and "see" the photos--don't just look at them.  ;)

Props to io856.  I should have noticed the LV manpurse but didn't; that alone is the dead giveaway! A picture really can say so much!  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: dj181 on June 07, 2010, 01:03:50 AM
Wait a minute! I have a man purse, but since I'm living over here in Europe, I guess that there isn't anything gay about it, right? ;-)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on June 07, 2010, 03:37:10 PM
You, my friend, are not connecting... the... dots...!  Such pregnant photos are very common in the world of bodybuilding.  Do not just "look" at the photos.  "See" them.  Here is your homework assignment: start back on page 1 of this thread and "see" the photos--don't just look at them.  ;)

Props to io856.  I should have noticed the LV manpurse but didn't; that alone is the dead giveaway! A picture really can say so much!  ;D

I'm sorry  :-[  Was just looking at the smoking hot bodies, will do Bay.

jt


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 19, 2010, 03:43:00 PM
The picture does not lie.  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on June 19, 2010, 05:03:37 PM
Ronnie knows who he appeals to by now and he is sure to exploit it.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 19, 2010, 05:24:43 PM
Ronnie knows who he appeals to by now and he is sure to exploit it.

Not every schmoe can say he has a picture with the most muscular BB in the world holding his hand  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on June 19, 2010, 05:42:00 PM
Not every schmoe can say he has a picture with the most muscular BB in the world holding his hand  ;)

that picture is so gay, and what is with the camera in the guys hand unless their is a mirror in front of them and he is taking a picture of himself and Ronnie, but someone is already taking a picture of two together.  Either way that is one lucky man!



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 20, 2010, 07:10:11 PM
Does anyone else think this looks creepy?  ???


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on June 20, 2010, 10:43:33 PM
louis vuitton man purse too
WTF? :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on June 21, 2010, 09:52:35 AM
Does anyone else think this looks creepy?  ???

LOL


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 21, 2010, 11:01:19 AM
WTF? :-\

The manpurse alone is suspect, but a designer one by Louis Vuitton?  Dude, how much more evidence do you need?  The photo does not lie.

Did you even know Louis Vuitton made a manpuse?  Phil did—and he wanted it.  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on June 21, 2010, 12:02:04 PM
The manpurse alone is suspect, but a designer one by Louis Vuitton?  Dude, how much more evidence do you need?  The photo does not lie.

Did you even know Louis Vuitton made a manpuse?  Phil did—and it wanted it.  ;D

bwhahwhahhahahah Bay is on a role  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 25, 2010, 07:49:59 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=341053.0;attach=374715;image)

Posting up a shot on a forum full of men.. in bed.. dopey look on your face, attempting to look pretty. That’s not gay at all.


 ;D

btw this guy is kinda cute.  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on June 25, 2010, 08:53:21 PM
The manpurse alone is suspect, but a designer one by Louis Vuitton?  Dude, how much more evidence do you need?  The photo does not lie.

Did you even know Louis Vuitton made a manpuse?  Phil did—and it wanted it.  ;D
Ok you win about manpurses being gay.
(http://thesatchelpages.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/hotornot-kanye-west.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 03, 2010, 08:40:48 AM
Daddy schmoe likes having muscleboys around his office.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 03, 2010, 09:28:47 AM
Daddy schmoe likes having muscleboys around his office.
Watch it bay. Ron doesn't  like it when you call weider a schome.  :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on July 03, 2010, 06:06:19 PM
Daddy schmoe likes having muscleboys around his office.

wow that is like a muscle sandwich minus any muscle in the middle


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 07, 2010, 05:05:28 AM
funny thing is im a big guy.. when me and my friends get drunk they all want to "grapple me" or "wrestle me"... i just laugh at their insecurities..... its almost faggish in my eyes


 ::)



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on July 07, 2010, 05:35:47 PM

 ::)



x2


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: maxbenner on July 07, 2010, 09:00:28 PM
louis vuitton man purse too


LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on July 07, 2010, 11:58:20 PM

 ::)


those seem like schmoes to me

I wonder if he ever wonders why they are buying all the drinks


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 08, 2010, 06:01:11 PM

 ::)


nothing wrong with male bonding, didn't you see wild hogs?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 15, 2010, 04:35:49 AM
that picture is the greatest EVER.......like, why would people need him to help them do that................why would a bodybuilder ever need to do that.........its just so blatantly homosexual

Why would anyone want to take or be in a photo like that?  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: MMA animal on July 15, 2010, 08:39:51 AM
bodybuilding is such a gay fuckin sport, grown men standing in there half naked all oiled up posing for one another, nevr met a bodybuilder who didnt pose for gay dudes, stripped for dudes or other things, its all part of the lifstyle


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 15, 2010, 04:57:29 PM
bodybuilding is such a gay fuckin sport, grown men standing in there half naked all oiled up posing for one another, nevr met a bodybuilder who didnt pose for gay dudes, stripped for dudes or other things, its all part of the lifstyle
ronnie coleman


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: jtsunami on July 15, 2010, 06:55:17 PM
ronnie coleman

r u sure about that?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 16, 2010, 06:29:28 AM
ronnie coleman

 ::)





Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 16, 2010, 07:39:47 AM
::)




That's just an euro thing. Two straight guys share beds over there too.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: MMA animal on July 16, 2010, 08:12:31 AM
i bet you even ronnie coleman sucked a few dicks in his day


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 16, 2010, 08:13:49 AM
i bet you even ronnie coleman sucked a few dicks in his day
STFU gimmick ::) ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 29, 2010, 01:18:40 PM
Rockel and Ruhl play "cock and balls"  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 30, 2010, 09:13:30 PM
Rockel and Ruhl play practice "cock and balls"  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: maxbenner on August 04, 2010, 02:11:40 AM
Rockel and Ruhl play "cock and balls"  ;D



it looks like he knows exactly what to do with it.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 15, 2010, 03:59:17 PM
It doesn't look gay, at all.  There's nothing gay about a guy holding tires.  Now, if it was two guys each holding a tire while kissing.......That's gay.

Is there anyone left who still things "the guy holding the tires" is a straight photo?  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on August 16, 2010, 12:07:03 PM
Is there anyone left who still things "the guy holding the tires" is a straight photo?  ::)

Bah!  Only a fool would think that.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on August 16, 2010, 02:25:24 PM
what about an nfl qb holding a goat?

(http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0WTefRsumlMIzEAo9ujzbkF/SIG=14e18ki8s/EXP=1282083820/**http%3a//www.yardbarker.com/media/2/8/285c6a4b70b1ab7df694dc91d3e903df7362869c/related/tom-brady-goat.jpg%3fstamp=1246122416)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on August 17, 2010, 07:48:48 AM
what about an nfl qb holding a goat?

(http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0WTefRsumlMIzEAo9ujzbkF/SIG=14e18ki8s/EXP=1282083820/**http%3a//www.yardbarker.com/media/2/8/285c6a4b70b1ab7df694dc91d3e903df7362869c/related/tom-brady-goat.jpg%3fstamp=1246122416)

E
That's not Vince.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 03, 2010, 11:57:05 AM
Ha ha ha  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: MindSpin on November 03, 2010, 12:03:46 PM
"I don’t see anything gay about it."  ha ha ha ha ha   ;D


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=248135.0;attach=287460;image)


LMAO!  What were you thinking Bob!?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 03, 2010, 12:08:23 PM
LMAO!  What were you thinking Bob!?

He did it "for the ladies"  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: MindSpin on November 03, 2010, 12:10:50 PM
This thread is hilarious!

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/donkeycalf.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on November 03, 2010, 02:27:47 PM
how about this one, bay ;D

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=29547.0;attach=26858;image)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on November 03, 2010, 06:05:27 PM
He did it "for the ladies"  ::)
hey, there are some kinky bitches out there man. ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 04, 2010, 05:28:07 AM
This thread is hilarious!

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/donkeycalf.jpg)

Truth is funnier than fiction!  :)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 06, 2010, 09:11:54 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 09, 2010, 06:08:37 AM
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 18, 2010, 12:55:33 PM
Is that Weider running up on stage to embrace his favorite muscleman?  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on November 18, 2010, 02:48:13 PM
Is that Weider running up on stage to embrace his favorite muscleman?  :D
How dare you sir!
 :P



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on November 19, 2010, 10:09:03 AM
wow; some of the gayest pics posted in this entire site!  its a hoot!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 25, 2011, 07:03:01 AM
 :)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on February 11, 2011, 06:52:45 AM
 ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on February 15, 2011, 04:08:15 PM
::)
that's not g...
damn.... i guess it is.  :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 14, 2011, 06:18:13 AM
Does anyone think Gunter made this video for women?  If so you need to connect... the... dots...  ::)

Notice the daisy dukes!  ha ha ha ha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftmSatljz0Q


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 18, 2011, 07:24:18 AM
 :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Victor VonDoom on March 18, 2011, 02:16:29 PM
We recognize both of them don't we?

Bah ha ha ha ha ha!  Doom is amused!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on March 21, 2011, 07:24:22 PM
:-\
caption
weider: once I finish tattooing my name on your dick, you will be a full pledge weider sponsoree.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 05, 2011, 05:05:57 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 12, 2011, 07:36:25 AM
A little help here...


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 14, 2011, 05:36:13 AM
"I'm your biggest fan!"


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on April 15, 2011, 01:53:25 PM
"I'm your biggest fan!"
I didnt know dudes did the white face tan?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on April 15, 2011, 09:42:40 PM
That one looks photoshopped.

Bay, it looks like you got owned in this thread by Earl1972.

Earl - one of the greatest fans of male physiques, all while not being gay.  While spending years ogling men he has not had one sexual thought and not one drop of saliva has escaped his lips.  A true aficionado.

haha sounds a bit tongue in cheek, but this is true 8)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 16, 2011, 06:33:57 AM
lol! how could md possibly deny this is blatant homosexual photography....has nothing to do with bodybuilding at all...

;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on April 16, 2011, 06:16:15 PM
Maybe the sexual thought has not broke the barrier out of the subconscious.

i think it would've happened by now

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on April 19, 2011, 03:56:21 PM
basketball is gay, and they can't claim they needed the money

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XLbLBmVtTNI/S8z-Aa-KAvI/AAAAAAAAAeA/3jPsLB_uuuU/s400/kobe-bryant-nude-232x300.jpg)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on April 19, 2011, 06:16:03 PM
basketball is gay, and they can't claim they needed the money

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XLbLBmVtTNI/S8z-Aa-KAvI/AAAAAAAAAeA/3jPsLB_uuuU/s400/kobe-bryant-nude-232x300.jpg)

E
and he likes to call people F@g. Kobe is a joke.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 20, 2011, 07:05:10 AM
 ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: j33ptj on April 25, 2011, 05:01:04 AM
Fuck, only now I find out I am gay...

thanks...


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 25, 2011, 05:09:05 AM
Fuck, only now I find out I am gay...

thanks...

It's only gay if you choose to pose for photo like these.  ;)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: j33ptj on April 25, 2011, 05:26:54 AM
phew!!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 25, 2011, 06:13:30 AM
phew!!

Or routinely choose to look at photos like these!  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on April 25, 2011, 12:16:02 PM
Or routinely choose to look at photos like these!  ;D
i choose to view.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 29, 2011, 11:36:24 AM
The last time I saw a shirt like this was at a gay bar . . .  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on April 29, 2011, 11:40:41 AM
International Male catalogue....lol


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 29, 2011, 12:31:07 PM
International Male catalogue....lol

Very!  :-[


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 16, 2011, 05:12:20 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 17, 2011, 04:56:43 AM
Would you wear a top like this?  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on May 17, 2011, 05:15:29 AM
if I looked like that i sure would!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 17, 2011, 05:35:39 AM
if I looked like that i sure would!

harlot!  :D

Seriously, where would you wear a garment like that?  At a bar/club?  In the gym?  At a gay pride event?  To the supermarket?  ???


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Fallsview on May 17, 2011, 06:31:19 AM
harlot!  :D

Seriously, where would you wear a garment like that?  At a bar/club?  In the gym?  At a gay pride event?  To the supermarket?  ???

If I exclusively shopped with International Male and Undergear!



STAY POSITIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 17, 2011, 07:09:58 AM
Any man who wore that at my gym would be laughed at. :-[


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 18, 2011, 06:10:45 AM
ring around the rosie
a pocket full of posies...


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on May 22, 2011, 04:18:06 PM
i haven't seen bodybuilding pics more gay than this, and they can't claim they needed the money

(http://www.famousplastic.com/images/oscardelahoya.jpg)

(http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/8594/pk8lm7.bmp)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on May 22, 2011, 07:23:16 PM
i haven't seen bodybuilding pics more gay than this, and they can't claim they needed the money

(http://www.famousplastic.com/images/oscardelahoya.jpg)

(http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/8594/pk8lm7.bmp)

E
he was on drugs and in a hotel room full of only bitches that he fucked tho.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on May 22, 2011, 08:30:12 PM
ok it's not gay if women are there ::)

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 07, 2011, 05:38:00 AM
I think I saw this scene in a gay porno once.  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 17, 2011, 04:54:33 AM
Oh, the irony!  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on June 28, 2011, 07:07:38 PM
Nothing gay to see here... move along.  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 02, 2011, 10:20:33 AM
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on July 07, 2011, 03:21:56 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL41GI7RdJs
"...every bodybuilder is a product that must be bought and sold to the marketplace"

"...present himself to be bought and sold..."

"if you don't know about a product you are not going to buy it... very simple thing"


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 07, 2011, 04:24:13 AM
The person narrating that video is gay as hell

Tom Platz.

;D


"...every bodybuilder is a product that must be bought and sold to the marketplace"

"...present himself to be bought and sold..."

"if you don't know about a product you are not going to buy it... very simple thing"

Touché!  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 27, 2011, 05:28:41 AM
Touch me...
Touch me...
Touch me now...



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 16, 2011, 05:12:45 AM
Anyone got a fire hose?  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on August 16, 2011, 01:06:15 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL41GI7RdJs
"...every bodybuilder is a product that must be bought and sold to the marketplace"

"...present himself to be bought and sold..."

"if you don't know about a product you are not going to buy it... very simple thing"
damn, lol


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 21, 2011, 09:18:26 AM
damn, lol

;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 21, 2011, 09:27:54 AM
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 22, 2011, 12:41:23 PM
This has gotta be a fun job!  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 25, 2011, 05:07:56 AM
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 18, 2012, 05:38:06 PM
Sigh!  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on January 30, 2012, 07:09:25 AM
nah fuck it, this is Gay without a shadow of a doubt!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISx8CYGV3SE

:'(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on February 12, 2012, 09:01:27 PM
 :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 05, 2012, 04:51:26 PM
 :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 12, 2012, 06:58:42 AM
Forget connecting... the... dots... Here are your heoric musclemen from yesteryear in straight out gay porn.  And, no, they weren't "tricked" into making such videos and they didn't do it "for the ladies."  :-*

Now, do you believe me?


I wish I could erase all this shit from my memory and go back to the weider healthy lifestyle days portrayed by the "champions" blissful ignorance...

Damn you beefy

I see bay has achieved redemption and gloating...you were right all along bay

;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on March 12, 2012, 03:14:33 PM
:-\
not chris... :(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 15, 2012, 10:12:02 AM
not chris... :(

Yep.  Chris!  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: MMA animal on March 15, 2012, 10:40:07 AM
bodybuilding is so gay, i mean how do u justify a sport where to compete u have to get lubed up and wear a banana hamock, shave your whole body and almost all your fans are dudes


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Earl1972 on March 15, 2012, 02:51:58 PM
bodybuilding is so gay, i mean how do u justify a sport where to compete u have to get lubed up and wear a banana hamock, shave your whole body and almost all your fans are dudes

name a sport where almost all the fans aren't dudes

E


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on March 15, 2012, 04:11:26 PM
Yep.  Chris!  ;D
take it back bay!!! take it back!! :(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: MMA animal on March 16, 2012, 09:08:37 AM
ya but bodybuilding specially, because it attracts mainly gay men, chicks dont dig that jacked up juice monkey look, its usually gay dudes, and most bodybuilders at some point have done some gay for hire type of shit or are themselves gay, how many dicks do u honestly think ronnie coleman or jay cutler have jerked off before they became mr olympia , iam pretty sure alot


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 16, 2012, 09:11:52 PM
take it back bay!!! take it back!! :(

you can't handle the truth!  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 16, 2012, 09:13:46 PM
ya but bodybuilding specially, because it attracts mainly gay men, chicks dont dig that jacked up juice monkey look, its usually gay dudes, and most bodybuilders at some point have done some gay for hire type of shit or are themselves gay, how many dicks do u honestly think ronnie coleman or jay cutler have jerked off before they became mr olympia , iam pretty sure alot

Now, what makes you say that?  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on March 16, 2012, 09:37:18 PM
theres really no need to connect any more dots this sums it up nicely

 
ya but bodybuilding specially, because it attracts mainly gay men, chicks dont dig that jacked up juice monkey look, its usually gay dudes, and most bodybuilders at some point have done some gay for hire type of shit or are themselves gay, how many dicks do u honestly think ronnie coleman or jay cutler have jerked off before they became mr olympia , iam pretty sure alot


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 17, 2012, 08:17:16 AM
Sigh!  Does it ever end...? :-[


"Married guy here who has been closeted my whole life. Not sure I can do that much longer.   

Me: Good looking, super nice, kind, sensitive and romantic, muscular, workout daily,very little m2m experience, football player type body (musclebear?),very attracted to muscle, flexing, touching, etc. Not sure what I am looking for... Friendship, romance, and whatever else might develope. I could use a buddy... Not sure if I'm a top or bottom cause I never did either. Think I'm a bottom. 

You: Won't judge me or the life I am leading; muscular (from thin/slim to super huge BBer); into flexing, touching, kissing, etc. Sensitive and kind and romantic. Can see through the baggage I am carrying and see the great guy that is me. Willing to be patient with me as I transform my life. Willing to be patient with me in sexual matters (hey- I'm new to this!) More to come as I think about things... 

Please at least say "hi" even if you don't want to meet. 

Thanks!"


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on March 18, 2012, 07:57:04 AM
Sigh!  Does it ever end...? :-[


"Married guy here who has been closeted my whole life. Not sure I can do that much longer.   

Me: Good looking, super nice, kind, sensitive and romantic, muscular, workout daily,very little m2m experience, football player type body (musclebear?),very attracted to muscle, flexing, touching, etc. Not sure what I am looking for... Friendship, romance, and whatever else might develope. I could use a buddy... Not sure if I'm a top or bottom cause I never did either. Think I'm a bottom. 

You: Won't judge me or the life I am leading; muscular (from thin/slim to super huge BBer); into flexing, touching, kissing, etc. Sensitive and kind and romantic. Can see through the baggage I am carrying and see the great guy that is me. Willing to be patient with me as I transform my life. Willing to be patient with me in sexual matters (hey- I'm new to this!) More to come as I think about things... 

Please at least say "hi" even if you don't want to meet. 

Thanks!"

Was this a PM you got?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on March 23, 2012, 11:20:09 PM
how about you bend over and i fuck you in the your ass? no condom

gh15 approved


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 24, 2012, 06:46:04 AM
I might otherwise scold you for posting that here as inappropriate, but I think you are onto something.  The (bi)curious guys on this board seem obsessed with man on man anal sex.  Often bringing it up out of the blue or imagining fanciful scenarios where it is taking place, about to take place, or could be taking place.  It is strange to see ostensibly straight men who are more preoccupied with anal sex than the majority of gay men I know.  Then again, on a bodybuilding board . . . perhaps this shouldn't be surprising at all . . . ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on March 24, 2012, 07:36:35 PM
I might otherwise scold you for posting that here as inappropriate, but I think you are onto something.  The (bi)curious guys on this board seem obsessed with man on man anal sex.  Often bringing it up out of the blue or imagining fanciful scenarios where it is taking place, about to take place, or could be taking place.  It is strange to see ostensibly straight men who are more preoccupied with anal sex than the majority of gay men I know.  Then again, on a bodybuilding board . . . perhaps this shouldn't be surprising at all . . . ::)
....so you're saying you wouldn't have sex with Nasser? ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 25, 2012, 07:43:59 AM
....so you're saying you wouldn't have sex with Nasser? ;D

Outed. ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 30, 2012, 01:23:30 PM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on March 30, 2012, 07:27:56 PM
Outed. ::)
You wish my gay little friend.  :-* and you didn't answer the question.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on March 31, 2012, 06:52:29 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 05, 2012, 06:07:54 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 12, 2012, 08:07:33 PM
Trying too hard.  :(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 13, 2012, 05:56:04 AM
"you have men doing the splits"  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 14, 2012, 07:16:14 AM
 ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 19, 2012, 06:14:15 AM
He did it... "for the ladies"


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on April 20, 2012, 05:29:09 AM
then call me ma'am !


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 29, 2012, 08:24:44 PM
"you have men doing the splits"  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on April 30, 2012, 04:33:10 AM
which means they can do wonderful things with their legs over my shoulders, back, etc. Or, over their head !


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on April 30, 2012, 07:20:11 AM
which means they can do wonderful things with their legs over my shoulders, back, etc. Or, over their head !

;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on May 01, 2012, 06:27:10 AM
:D
Not gay. Just a black angel of death.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 01, 2012, 03:26:33 PM
Not gay. Just a black angel of death.

Wrong.  It's gay!  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on May 01, 2012, 07:10:28 PM
Wrong.  It's gay!  ::)
wrong. not gay. >:(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: io856 on May 01, 2012, 11:28:04 PM
wrong. not gay. >:(
connect... the... dots...

he is a homoerotic angel sent from heaven to fulfill all your desires


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on May 02, 2012, 09:29:00 AM
connect... the... dots...

he is a homoerotic angel sent from heaven to fulfill all your desires
i'll add that to my nightly prayer request !


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on May 02, 2012, 11:30:57 AM
i'll add that to my nightly prayer request !
Bay thinks everyone is gay. No one cares that bay loves to slurp and suck on dicks and hairy balls. But saying everyone he wants to sleep with is gay, just shows how disturbed and self centered he is.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 21, 2012, 07:05:54 AM
Behold my sword!


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 26, 2012, 05:11:16 AM
Remember when a few of our friends here kept saying they didn't see anything gay about a guy holding tires?  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on May 27, 2012, 08:40:05 AM
They're not even pretending anymore.....just straight "gayness for sale".  :-\

 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 05, 2012, 09:24:41 PM
They're not even pretending anymore.....just straight "gayness for sale".  :-\

 ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: YellaDawg on July 06, 2012, 08:43:04 AM
I am seriously thinking about starting a thread discussing / detailing my true-life 20 + years experiences as a bodybuilding g4p / gay sponsor / schmoe  / muscle worship client, but more of an interactive Q&A thing. For maximum viewage and responses, which forum would be the best to start this thread: Relationship Talk, More Explicit Sex Talk or Gossip & Opinions?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 06, 2012, 09:04:05 AM
Is there a reason you think such a discussion shouldn't continue in the Escorting thread?

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=36549.0


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: YellaDawg on July 06, 2012, 09:14:32 AM
Is there a reason you think such a discussion shouldn't continue in the Escorting thread?

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=36549.0

Yes, my experiences involve more than just what is defined as "escorting". Also, this would be more of my own personal experiences and knowledge. I want to call the thread something like "Ask A Schmoe Anything".

Which forum would be best?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 06, 2012, 09:30:55 AM
Yes, my experiences involve more than just what is defined as "escorting". Also, this would be more of my own personal experiences and knowledge. I want to call the thread something like "Ask A Schmoe Anything".

Which forum would be best?

I read your post and think it belongs in Muscle Escorting--a widely read thread. Virtually every post on this board is based on the poster's personal experience, knowledge, perspective, or opinion.  Do as you will.

Explicit queer postings on the main Gossip board will be deleted in short order.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: YellaDawg on July 06, 2012, 09:38:17 AM
I read your post and think it belongs in Muscle Escorting--a widely read thread. Virtually every post on this board is based on the poster's personal experience, knowledge, perspective, or opinion.  Do as you will.

Explicit queer postings on the main Gossip board will be deleted in short order.

We'll split the baby then. I will put it in the same forum as your long-standing Muscle Escorting thread (the More Explicit Sex Board), but I'll start my own thread. We'll see how it does.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 06, 2012, 09:48:40 AM
Why are you asking for advice if you are not going to take it?  Obviously, you could have posted where ever you wanted without asking for input.  Are you only willing to hear what you want to hear?  ???


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: YellaDawg on July 06, 2012, 09:57:28 AM
Why are you asking for advice if you are not going to take it?  Obviously, you could have posted where ever you wanted without asking for input.  Are you only willing to hear what you want to hear?  ???

Advice is meant to be heard and carefully evaluated, not to be taken absolutely.

If it helps, I originally was going to post in the Gossip & Opinions forum, but your advice did get me to change that.



Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on July 07, 2012, 10:53:58 AM
Advice is meant to be heard and carefully evaluated, not to be taken absolutely.

If it helps, I originally was going to post in the Gossip & Opinions forum, but your advice did get me to change that.


I for one, and I'm unanimous in this, will be looking forward to all your posts.
just give us a heads up when you start and where it is.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on July 07, 2012, 10:55:30 AM
I am seriously thinking about starting a thread discussing / detailing my true-life 20 + years experiences as a bodybuilding g4p / gay sponsor / schmoe  / muscle worship client, but more of an interactive Q&A thing. For maximum viewage and responses, which forum would be the best to start this thread: Relationship Talk, More Explicit Sex Talk or Gossip & Opinions?
way to go!
I'll be looking forward to this.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: YellaDawg on July 08, 2012, 06:18:27 AM
I for one, and I'm unanimous in this, will be looking forward to all your posts.
just give us a heads up when you start and where it is.


Chad:

I started a new thread in the More Explicit Sex Board called "Ask A 'Schmoe' Anything (g4p / gay)!". Here is the link:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=430425.0

However, I feel comfortable in the Q&A format only, not just volunteering info. So, feel free to post there and ask me questions and I'll try to answer as comfortably as I can. I've been at Getbig since 1995 under this same user name, as anyone can see in my profile, so this certainly is no gimmick.

My first post there should give some idea of my background in "schmoeing." But I need group / audience participation to really make that thread work. If not, I'll probably just delete it. So, by all means, contribute.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 11, 2012, 07:10:32 AM
 ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: chadstallion on July 11, 2012, 01:42:21 PM
lol
Sam Dukes
wearing Daisy Dukes.
priceless


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 11, 2012, 04:55:21 PM
But... but...

It doesn't look gay, at all.  There's nothing gay about a guy holding tires.  

::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 21, 2012, 05:32:50 AM
 :)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 27, 2012, 06:23:28 AM
 :(


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: YellaDawg on July 27, 2012, 07:07:08 AM
:(

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=248135.0;attach=478460;image)

=

(http://static.thehollywoodgossip.com/images/gallery/jessica-simpson-as-daisy-duke.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on July 27, 2012, 09:50:41 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=248135.0;attach=478460;image)

=

(http://static.thehollywoodgossip.com/images/gallery/jessica-simpson-as-daisy-duke.jpg)

(http://i46.tinypic.com/5mg0ft.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on July 29, 2012, 06:56:26 AM
I could do without the pink tank top.. but those legs more than make up for it!  :P


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on August 01, 2012, 07:22:19 PM
It's just a man with a tire... and there is nothing gay about it. Right?  ::)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on October 19, 2012, 06:56:41 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on October 21, 2012, 09:07:29 AM
 :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Moen on October 21, 2012, 10:06:28 AM
:(

Hahaha some of these are SO over-gay it actually becomes pure comedy  :D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on October 22, 2012, 06:36:19 PM
Gay... but not in a good way.  :-\


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: BayGBM on November 10, 2012, 07:23:16 AM
"gayness for sale"  ;D


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on December 19, 2012, 10:07:25 AM
"gayness for sale"  ;D
have you hit that bay?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: anabolichalo on December 19, 2012, 10:38:36 AM
for a decade i tried to be blind to the gayness

thinking only the tier10 bodybuilders did it

now after this thread i wonder

are they all fags after all

a guy like branch warren.... how is that even possible


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on December 19, 2012, 11:19:44 AM
for a decade i tried to be blind to the gayness

thinking only the tier10 bodybuilders did it

now after this thread i wonder

are they all fags after all

a guy like branch warren.... how is that even possible
Branch did gay shit?


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: anabolichalo on December 19, 2012, 01:02:08 PM
Branch did gay shit?
i surely hope not!

i wanted to mention him to say that i still want to believe there are bodybuilders among the pros who never did no gay shit


branch comes to mind since he's some sort of business man who doesnt need sugar daddy


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: HTexan on December 22, 2012, 04:47:05 PM
i surely hope not!

i wanted to mention him to say that i still want to believe there are bodybuilders among the pros who never did no gay shit


branch comes to mind since he's some sort of business man who doesnt need sugar daddy
The bber that did "Schmoe" shit that really let me down was chris cormier.


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Bosch on December 22, 2012, 09:22:24 PM
team Hardcore
(http://s48.radikal.ru/i119/1210/58/88153d970008.jpg)
(http://cdn103.iofferphoto.com/img/item/102/326/917/zWPgv9jYGG8eJNC.jpg)


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: usmcdevildoc on December 24, 2012, 02:14:17 AM
The bber that did "Schmoe" shit that really let me down was chris cormier.

He still does, doesn't he? The Heidi Fleiss of Gold's Venice-- not all women either.
NO HOMO


Title: Re: Connecting . . . the . . . dots . . . (schmoe)
Post by: Kwon_2 on June 30, 2015, 05:02:09 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=248135.0;attach=461130;image)

Bob Birdsong was great in that movie.