Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Religious Debates & Threads => Topic started by: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 04:43:30 PM
-
Lol, this is hilarious...
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
How can a evolutionist be an authority on religion?
They are not mutually exclusive.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. His thoughts do not personally affect me or my life.
-
How can a evolutionist be an authority on religion?
Your mistake is in assuming that religion is a proper field of study...
They are not mutually exclusive.
What? This works against your argument since if they are not mutually exclusive then Dawkins can speak on it since they overlap(according to your line of reasoning). If they were mutually exclusive, then Dawkins couldn't speak on it since they would be different fiields of expertise. But this is besides the point, since religion is make-believe nonsense.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Your mistake is in assuming that religion is a proper field of study...
What? This works against your argument since if they are not mutually exclusive then Dawkins can speak on it since they overlap(according to your line of reasoning). If they were mutually exclusive, then Dawkins couldn't speak on it since they would be different fiields of expertise. But this is besides the point, since religion is make-believe nonsense.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Theology is a field of study.
Yes but Dawkins asserts that religion is nonsense. Both can co-exist
-
They all sound like 15-year-olds wrote them.
-
Yea those 'burn in hell' religious people are the idiots that make the rest of us look bad.
Extremism and fundamentalism in any form is bad IMO
-
Theology is a field of study.
No, it isn't. It is made up nonsense. I could create a field of study on fairies and proclaim it to be a proper field of study and it would be as legitimate as religion.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
English literature is a field of study. Lots of that is made up also.
I don't care if you believe or not fact remains it is a field of study regardless if you believe it.
-
English literature is a field of study. Lots of that is made up also.
Wrong. Literature studies something that exists - literary works. Theology supposedly studies something that doesen't exist or at least for which there is no evidence that He exists - God and His nature. Big difference.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Richard Dawson host the worlds dumbest family
-
Wrong. Literature studies something that exists - literary works. Theology supposedly studies something that doesen't exist or at least for which there is no evidence that He exists - God and His nature. Big difference.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
The bible is arguably a work of literature
-
The bible is arguably a work of literature
Apples and oranges. Studying the bible as a literary work constitutes literature, but studying the nature of the God it claims to exist does not constitute theology but simply crookery.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Wrong. Literature studies something that exists - literary works. Theology supposedly studies something that doesen't exist or at least for which there is no evidence that He exists - God and His nature. Big difference.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
from dictionary.com:
–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of god and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. a particular form, system, branch, or course of this study.
so, dickface, are you saying that religion doesn't exist? just stop being a fucking idiot.
-
from dictionary.com:
–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of god and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. a particular form, system, branch, or course of this study.
so, dickface, are you saying that religion doesn't exist? just stop being a fucking idiot.
Religion exists but doesen't constitute theology, you fucking moron. Theology is the study of God's nature. Theology is a fraud because what it proposes to study(God) is something for which there is no evidence that it exists.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
(http://home.comcast.net/~matchgame/3x5pictures/RD3.jpg)
-
Religion exists but doesen't constitute theology, you fucking moron. Theology is the study of God's nature. Theology is a fraud because what it proposes to study(God) is something for which there is no evidence that it exists.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
stupid argument. most things we accept as granted because at some point we as a society agreed on its validity. such as "liberal arts". my degree says "liberal arts". what the fuck's a liberal art? on some level, it's just as crazy to believe in existence of something as abstract as a "liberal art" as it is to believe in a god.
-
stupid argument. most things we accept as granted because at some point we as a society agreed on its validity. such as "liberal arts". my degree says "liberal arts". what the fuck's a liberal art? on some level, it's just as crazy to believe in existence of something as abstract as a "liberal art" as it is to believe in a god.
You are truly an imbecile of gargantuan proportions. Nothing further to add.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
What is the difference in studing the books and plays of Shakespeare and that of The Bible?
-
Why is he so bitter......he seemed like such a pleasant guy on "Hogan's Heroes"
-
anyone notice that at 2:42 someone in the room is heard saying "oh jesus"
-
Fuck Dawkins , he talks like he knows something that we don't know,he doesn't know shit ,fuck him.
-
Religion of peace.
-
Your mistake is in assuming that religion is a proper field of study...
SUCKMYMUSCLE
We'll leave it to you to decide for others what is proper to study.
You are such an arrogant, self-absorb, full of yourself ass clown.
-
from dictionary.com:
–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of god and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. a particular form, system, branch, or course of this study.
so, dickface, are you saying that religion doesn't exist? just stop being a fucking idiot.
He can't stop being an idiot because it is simply who and what he is. He can't change his nature.
-
You are truly an imbecile of gargantuan proportions. Nothing further to add.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
The irony.
-
Theology = a joke.
-
The irony.
The irony of someone who believes in something for which there is no evidence saying "the irony" to me for calling someone who believes in that for which there is no evidence an imbecile.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Theology = a joke.
You truly got the gist of it.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
-
Dawkins rules. He got a pile of bibles in the bathroom to whipe his ass with. At least it makes them useful just for once!
Dr. Dutch, orthodox atheist.
-
Dawkins is a genius!! Not because of intelligence or adding anything noteworthy to the "debate", no
he is a genius because he got rich and famous by making fun of religion and its followers
-
The irony of someone who believes in something for which there is no evidence saying "the irony" to me for calling someone who believes in that for which there is no evidence an imbecile.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Wow! That 160 IQ is really showing.
Claiming to know that God exist is just as fallacious as claiming to know he doesn't exist. Believing that the universe always existed or that it was created are both matters of faith.
You have no evidence that you will be around 15 years from this exact day but I assume you believe that you will be.
It is not uncommon to believe in something that you have no concrete evidence to back up. Many, many people believe that Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks, the moon landing was faked, bin Laden has been dead for years and JNN is straight.
But there are reptilian hybrids, dummy. And in both cases we have an abundance of examples and concrete evidence.