| There has been no global warming since 1998 |
The Telegraph ^ | 7/6/11 | James Delingpole [/b]
There has been no global warming since 1998
________________________ ________________________ _____________
The headline of this post really shouldn’t be controversial. It chimes perfectly with what Kevin “null hypothesis” Trenberth wrote in that notorious 2009 Climategate email to Michael Mann:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
And it’s what Phil Jones admitted in a BBC interview when he said that there had been no “statistically significant” warming since 1995.
Why then am I mentioning it now? W-e-l-l, because just as ze war is to the Germans, Chappaquiddick is to the Kennedy family and that Portland masseuse incident to Al Gore, so the recent lack of warming is to the, er, Warmists. They hate it. It’s an affront to everything they believe in. Damn it, if the world isn’t warming with the alacrity they’d prefer, how are they going to keep the funding gravy train going, and how are they going to persuade an increasingly sceptical populace that the “science” is “settled”, the debate over and the time for action is now? That’s why they can’t reminded of the truth often enough. It’s like salting the slugs that are ruining your garden: necessary, but also kind of fun too.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
The Telegraph ^ | 7/6/11 | James Delingpole [/b]
There has been no global warming since 1998
________________________ ________________________ _____________
The headline of this post really shouldn’t be controversial. It chimes perfectly with what Kevin “null hypothesis” Trenberth wrote in that notorious 2009 Climategate email to Michael Mann:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
And it’s what Phil Jones admitted in a BBC interview when he said that there had been no “statistically significant” warming since 1995.
Why then am I mentioning it now? W-e-l-l, because just as ze war is to the Germans, Chappaquiddick is to the Kennedy family and that Portland masseuse incident to Al Gore, so the recent lack of warming is to the, er, Warmists. They hate it. It’s an affront to everything they believe in. Damn it, if the world isn’t warming with the alacrity they’d prefer, how are they going to keep the funding gravy train going, and how are they going to persuade an increasingly sceptical populace that the “science” is “settled”, the debate over and the time for action is now? That’s why they can’t reminded of the truth often enough. It’s like salting the slugs that are ruining your garden: necessary, but also kind of fun too.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
The Telegraph ^ | 7/6/11 | James Delingpole [/b]
There has been no global warming since 1998
________________________ ________________________ _____________
The headline of this post really shouldn’t be controversial. It chimes perfectly with what Kevin “null hypothesis” Trenberth wrote in that notorious 2009 Climategate email to Michael Mann:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
And it’s what Phil Jones admitted in a BBC interview when he said that there had been no “statistically significant” warming since 1995.
Why then am I mentioning it now? W-e-l-l, because just as ze war is to the Germans, Chappaquiddick is to the Kennedy family and that Portland masseuse incident to Al Gore, so the recent lack of warming is to the, er, Warmists. They hate it. It’s an affront to everything they believe in. Damn it, if the world isn’t warming with the alacrity they’d prefer, how are they going to keep the funding gravy train going, and how are they going to persuade an increasingly sceptical populace that the “science” is “settled”, the debate over and the time for action is now? That’s why they can’t reminded of the truth often enough. It’s like salting the slugs that are ruining your garden: necessary, but also kind of fun too.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
Getbig is a bastion of scientific stupidity.
Getbig is a bastion of scientific stupidity.And chronic masturbators.
The Telegraph ^ | 7/6/11 | James Delingpole [/b]
There has been no global warming since 1998
________________________ ________________________ _____________
The headline of this post really shouldn’t be controversial. It chimes perfectly with what Kevin “null hypothesis” Trenberth wrote in that notorious 2009 Climategate email to Michael Mann:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
And it’s what Phil Jones admitted in a BBC interview when he said that there had been no “statistically significant” warming since 1995.
Why then am I mentioning it now? W-e-l-l, because just as ze war is to the Germans, Chappaquiddick is to the Kennedy family and that Portland masseuse incident to Al Gore, so the recent lack of warming is to the, er, Warmists. They hate it. It’s an affront to everything they believe in. Damn it, if the world isn’t warming with the alacrity they’d prefer, how are they going to keep the funding gravy train going, and how are they going to persuade an increasingly sceptical populace that the “science” is “settled”, the debate over and the time for action is now? That’s why they can’t reminded of the truth often enough. It’s like salting the slugs that are ruining your garden: necessary, but also kind of fun too.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
Considering you voted for obama thinking he would improve the economy, you really are not in a position to throw stones.i dont think anyone voted for obama because they thought hed improve the economy. everyone voted for him because they thought hed give us universal healthcare, increase the taxes on the rich, stop the iraq war, increase funding for stem cell research, protect abortion rights, and increase personal freedoms like the right to marry and ending the drug prohibition.
The Telegraph ^ | 7/6/11 | James Delingpole [/b]
There has been no global warming since 1998
________________________ ________________________ _____________
The headline of this post really shouldn’t be controversial. It chimes perfectly with what Kevin “null hypothesis” Trenberth wrote in that notorious 2009 Climategate email to Michael Mann:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
And it’s what Phil Jones admitted in a BBC interview when he said that there had been no “statistically significant” warming since 1995.
Why then am I mentioning it now? W-e-l-l, because just as ze war is to the Germans, Chappaquiddick is to the Kennedy family and that Portland masseuse incident to Al Gore, so the recent lack of warming is to the, er, Warmists. They hate it. It’s an affront to everything they believe in. Damn it, if the world isn’t warming with the alacrity they’d prefer, how are they going to keep the funding gravy train going, and how are they going to persuade an increasingly sceptical populace that the “science” is “settled”, the debate over and the time for action is now? That’s why they can’t reminded of the truth often enough. It’s like salting the slugs that are ruining your garden: necessary, but also kind of fun too.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
Mmm, take a look at most of the scientists, they are the Government scientists who are writing most of these reports...liberal minions!
Dude, its no secret its a liberal agenda why do you think they battle this in DC?
i dont think anyone voted for obama because they thought hed improve the economy. everyone voted for him because they thought hed give us universal healthcare, increase the taxes on the rich, stop the iraq war, increase funding for stem cell research, protect abortion rights, and increase personal freedoms like the right to marry and ending the drug prohibition.
he hasnt done most of those because people are sheep and the republicans have taken advantage of the sour economy and turned everyone against obama, as if its his fault that we are in this recession.
I agree with you 99%. I disagree about the economy improving. I think most did vote for him because of the policies he championed which if followed through with would have improved the economy rather than rescuing it from the brink of a depression. The supposed trillion dollar stimulus which was only 787 billion which was really only about half that because roughly half went to tax breaks including for the rich which reduces its effectiveness even more.
Yeah instead of pissing away 278k for every phony job created or saved, it would have been far better had we spent 600k for every bogus job alleged to have been saved.
Fail.
Tell 3.5 million people who are still working or found work that their jobs and paychecks are phony. Your sadly just not very bright.
Getbig is a bastion ofCorrected above quote for greater accuracy. :)scientificstupidity.
Dude, its no secret its a liberal agenda why do you think they battle this in DC?
(http://moondogsports.com/wp-content/gallery/wendy-combattente-hand-bra/wendy-combattente-hand-bra-7.jpg)
Dude, its no secret its a liberal agenda why do you think they battle this in DC?paranoia ?
Wanna start with the scientists that proved Algores movie to be a complete farce. BTW, who the hell removed you from my lawn?
post the studies and evidence then.
"the scientists that proved al gore wrong" lol. Its funny that you believe the other party has an agenda yet you are fine with conservative scientists taking the other position. The funny thing is science doesn't work like that, the vast majority >95% agree the climate is trending towards warming, are they all liberal? this is all across the world by the way, no country disagrees.
Trending? Ha Ha Ha
Every year when the seasons change, the climage trends warmer and cooler no?
Yes, I can't believe how hot it is...............in July.
are you a troll?
what does climate change refer to?
seriously, would you admit you are not well informed on specific scientific matters such as evolution and climate change?
Imbeciles believe that there is no global warming....
Imbecils believe that giving al gore, Goldman Sachs, GE, Obama, Pelosi, and the criminal conspiracy known as the CME trillions of taxpayer dollars to gamble on this hokus pokus crap will result in anything other than more debt, corruption, fraud, waste, and abuse.
Personally, I do believe in curbing carbon emissions and stuff like that... However, if I keep the lights off during the day, and I save energy in other places... such as like walking to work (which I do) then I can drive my fuel inefficient car ALL DAY LONG on the weekends if I want to.
I believe in trying to curb them, but taxing people on them is just fucked up.
And taking away some of my freedoms to save the planet is retarded... There is no correlation at all.
what if persons who had eco friendly cars received a tax deduction ? with a plan to abolish gas cars slowly by 2020 ?
Considering you voted for obama thinking he would improve the economy, you really are not in a position to throw stones.
As is evolution vs. Creation? Let's put it this way, if it were as clear cut as people think it is (Evolutionists) there would be no need for debate. Yet its debated everyday. Climate change happens daily as well, never mind the earths temp has risen a degree or two in the last 100-150 years.
its debated by those who know nothing of evolution, the bachmanns, the hovinds etc.. The scientific consensus is 99% in agreement of those in biology. You realize that biology would fail without evolution, that numerous applications have been made based on evolution including medcine and bioinformatics for example. Its debated because of the ramifications of evolution as seen in the eyes of religious which is not so. The vatican even stated it as a fact.
also, mathematics as in nested hierarchy's point out evolutions truth, it follows the pattern predicted to a tee.
you must realize creation is not science right?
do you know much about evolution? please answer, what would you say your understanding on genomics, ecology etc are. good? poor? do you think you could adequetely define what evolution encompasses and provide valid criticism?
As is evolution vs. Creation? Let's put it this way, if it were as clear cut as people think it is (Evolutionists) there would be no need for debate. Yet its debated everyday. Climate change happens daily as well, never mind the earths temp has risen a degree or two in the last 100-150 years.
LOL...this is why I don't bother anymore. LOL
lmao!!!!!!!!!! hella weak bro..
16% AND/OR 15 MILLION who cant find work in Obama's economy agree w me.yeah it was awesome when he took over right
The Telegraph ^ | 7/6/11 | James Delingpole [/b]
There has been no global warming since 1998
________________________ ________________________ _____________
The headline of this post really shouldn’t be controversial. It chimes perfectly with what Kevin “null hypothesis” Trenberth wrote in that notorious 2009 Climategate email to Michael Mann:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
And it’s what Phil Jones admitted in a BBC interview when he said that there had been no “statistically significant” warming since 1995.
Why then am I mentioning it now? W-e-l-l, because just as ze war is to the Germans, Chappaquiddick is to the Kennedy family and that Portland masseuse incident to Al Gore, so the recent lack of warming is to the, er, Warmists. They hate it. It’s an affront to everything they believe in. Damn it, if the world isn’t warming with the alacrity they’d prefer, how are they going to keep the funding gravy train going, and how are they going to persuade an increasingly sceptical populace that the “science” is “settled”, the debate over and the time for action is now? That’s why they can’t reminded of the truth often enough. It’s like salting the slugs that are ruining your garden: necessary, but also kind of fun too.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...