Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ksa_triceps on March 16, 2012, 02:50:05 PM

Title: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: ksa_triceps on March 16, 2012, 02:50:05 PM: The "world gym championship (fitness)" was held in Kuwait. Instead of worrying about the color or the thong, and if it's glittery or not, competitors here worry about the color and cut of their jeans.

Was the Olympia physique/fitness or whatever it was called (the one they wear shorts) inspired by these competitions??

With no regard for legs, I might have a chance of trying this shit out!

Here are some pics of the final 8)

(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/422572_10150681720941684_77941031683_9348928_105246374_n.jpg)

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/422973_10150681721411684_77941031683_9348929_312403686_n.jpg)

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/419608_10150681734406684_77941031683_9348963_1469806345_n.jpg)

How the judging crew should look like, big and mean! :D

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/416998_10150681777336684_77941031683_9349110_1600821248_n.jpg)
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: dr.chimps on March 16, 2012, 02:57:13 PM: Brutal. Now, where's that old pic of Uncle Joe Weider with his pants on. ;)
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Hulkotron on March 16, 2012, 03:00:32 PM: Peel for Lonnie
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: biff on March 16, 2012, 03:04:23 PM: somehow seems more gay
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: bradistani on March 16, 2012, 03:06:47 PM: (http://imgbox.com/aaucilrg.gif)
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: DroppingPlates on March 16, 2012, 04:40:16 PM: Skinny jeans are as gay as men in thongs
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: hench on March 16, 2012, 05:23:37 PM: yes!
you can see they all have virtually no legs, bet their upper and lower halves would look like 2 different physiques
Quote from: DroppingPlates on March 16, 2012, 04:40:16 PM
Skinny jeans are as gay as men in thongs
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: DroppingPlates on March 16, 2012, 10:15:04 PM: Notice the box of tissues :-X

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/416998_10150681777336684_77941031683_9349110_1600821248_n.jpg)
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: the trainer on March 16, 2012, 10:18:31 PM: I am one of the few guys who love training legs so fuck that competition.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Max B on March 16, 2012, 11:11:00 PM: the guys who "love" training legs to have huge quads and dont compete do not understand the concept of illusion or they dont fuck women at all.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: the trainer on March 16, 2012, 11:38:39 PM: Quote from: Max B on March 16, 2012, 11:11:00 PM
the guys who "love" training legs to have huge quads and dont compete do not understand the concept of illusion or they dont fuck women at all.

Fuck that i am obsessed with keeping my quads huge and wearing tight jeans to show them off.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: DK II on March 16, 2012, 11:51:57 PM: f@ggots
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 17, 2012, 12:42:04 AM: Legs are to be muscular and defined...but they shouldn't so so big as you can't fit into normal clothes.

Arnold had the perfect legs to aspire to IMO, and as far as who had the "best" legs ever in a bodybuilding sense...Paul Dillet hands down

Long legs.... HUGE, perfectly shaped, no weak points and tiny knees
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: DK II on March 17, 2012, 12:51:41 AM: Quote from: Groink on March 17, 2012, 12:42:04 AM
Legs are to be muscular and defined...but they shouldn't so so big as you can't fit into normal clothes.

Arnold had the perfect legs to aspire to IMO, and as far as who had the "best" legs ever in a bodybuilding sense...Paul Dillet hands down

Long legs.... HUGE, perfectly shaped, no weak points and tiny knees

Everyone I know who trains legs has problems fitting into a pair of jeans from the shelf.

I wouldn't say my legs are huge, but I have trouble finding "normal" clothes.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: bigmc on March 17, 2012, 04:02:41 AM: Quote from: DK II on March 17, 2012, 12:51:41 AM
Everyone I know who trains legs has problems fitting into a pair of jeans from the shelf.

I wouldn't say my legs are huge, but I have trouble finding "normal" clothes.

sure you do
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: DK II on March 17, 2012, 04:52:23 AM: Quote from: bigmc on March 17, 2012, 04:02:41 AM
sure you do

Jealous?

What's up, do I have a new stalker now?

Sorry that I have hurt your feelings, fuckwit. Now crawl back into your basement and STFU.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: deceiver on March 17, 2012, 05:06:32 AM: Quote from: Groink on March 17, 2012, 12:42:04 AM
Legs are to be muscular and defined...but they shouldn't so so big as you can't fit into normal clothes.

Arnold had the perfect legs to aspire to IMO, and as far as who had the "best" legs ever in a bodybuilding sense...Paul Dillet hands down

Long legs.... HUGE, perfectly shaped, no weak points and tiny knees

Is this your official excuse for not doing squats, ass to grass?
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Papper on March 17, 2012, 05:24:31 AM: (http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/419608_10150681734406684_77941031683_9348963_1469806345_n.jpg)

That guy have stilts for legs. Just because they can wear jeans shouldnt mean a withered down toothpick of a leg can be accepted.

Quote from: bigmc on March 17, 2012, 04:02:41 AM
sure you do

lol'd
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: ksa_triceps on March 18, 2012, 03:26:16 PM: It seems that even the bigger studs are no big fans of huge legs.

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/424450_10150685374516684_77941031683_9362336_1016052092_n.jpg)
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: viking1 on March 18, 2012, 03:47:03 PM: Quote from: ksa_triceps on March 18, 2012, 03:26:16 PM
It seems that even the bigger studs are no big fans of huge legs.

(http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/424450_10150685374516684_77941031683_9362336_1016052092_n.jpg)

:o lol
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Voland on March 18, 2012, 04:12:46 PM: big legs like kai, branch, jay etc look retarded built, well detailed and separated legs looks much better. No need to walk like you have a sore anus.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: deceiver on March 18, 2012, 05:06:44 PM: Quote from: Voland on March 18, 2012, 04:12:46 PM
big legs like kai, branch, jay etc look retarded built, well detailed and separated legs looks much better. No need to walk like you have a sore anus.

yeah and having upper body of their size is perfectly normal?

wtf.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Voland on March 18, 2012, 05:12:58 PM: Quote from: deceiver on March 18, 2012, 05:06:44 PM
yeah and having upper body of their size is perfectly normal?

wtf.

upper body, if symmetrical and proportioned is never too big.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Your Average GymRat on March 18, 2012, 08:50:47 PM: Quote from: Groink on March 17, 2012, 12:42:04 AM
Legs are to be muscular and defined...but they shouldn't so so big as you can't fit into normal clothes.

Arnold had the perfect legs to aspire to IMO, and as far as who had the "best" legs ever in a bodybuilding sense...Paul Dillet hands down

Long legs.... HUGE, perfectly shaped, no weak points and tiny knees

No one wants your opinion. Die now.
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: MAXX on March 18, 2012, 09:27:49 PM: Quote from: DK II on March 17, 2012, 12:51:41 AM
Everyone I know who trains legs has problems fitting into a pair of jeans from the shelf.

I wouldn't say my legs are huge, but I have trouble finding "normal" clothes.
okay whatever you say "big guy"

:D j/k
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Cleanest Natural on March 18, 2012, 10:03:06 PM: Quote from: Groink on March 17, 2012, 12:42:04 AM
Legs are to be muscular and defined...but they shouldn't so so big as you can't fit into normal clothes.

Arnold had the perfect legs to aspire to IMO, and as far as who had the "best" legs ever in a bodybuilding sense...Paul Dillet hands down

Long legs.... HUGE, perfectly shaped, no weak points and tiny knees

:D
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 18, 2012, 10:09:57 PM: Quote from: Your Average GymRat on March 18, 2012, 08:50:47 PM
No one wants your opinion. Die now.

Eat a cock you filthy paki scum, or should i say eat another cock
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Palpatine Q on March 18, 2012, 10:12:59 PM: Quote from: Cleanest Natural on March 18, 2012, 10:03:06 PM
:D

another one who's mind i own.

"Hi, I'm sebastian...i've been taking two grams of steroids a week for the last three months, spending money i don't have..so i can hopefully be bigger than some guy on the other side of the world that is more popular than me on a BBing forum"
Title: Re: You don't train legs? You're in luck!
Post by: Primemuscle on March 18, 2012, 10:14:35 PM: Wearing jeans to compete in a bodybuilding contest seems ridiculous. Anyone who thinks all they need train is their upper body is delusional.