Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: NeoSeminole on June 22, 2012, 03:51:07 PM
-
no other bodybuilder in history can beat this :)
-
:)
-
best bber EVER right there
-
that Id-City guy seems like a jackass shouldve let the photos be
-
Big dude, all the way big dude.
Cool pics.
-
that Id-City guy seems like a jackass shouldve let the photos be
it actually says "Mid-City Photo" over the pics. I found them yesterday on eBay. You can buy the print without the watermark, lol
here is what they look like
-
1, 3, 2 :P
-
Sick from the back, stupid looking midsection ruins the front.
-
King of the Mr. O
-
Ronnie in 99 was The Man.
-
it actually says "Mid-City Photo" over the pics. I found them yesterday on eBay. You can buy the print without the watermark, lol
here is what they look like
Anything gayer than scouring ebay for pictures of oiled up muscle studs ???
-
great shots.
the stage shots were printed in ironman in their olympia 99 review.
I used to have the mag but the pages got all stuck together for some reason. ??? :-*
there was also a sick front double bi shot that I would be cool to find again.
99 was the best ronnie ever.
-
great shots.
the stage shots were printed in ironman in their olympia 99 review.
I used to have the mag but the pages got all stuck together for some reason. ??? :-*
there was also a sick front double bi shot that I would be cool to find again.
99 was the best ronnie ever.
:D All stuck together ???? A mag full of muscle men ????? lol .
-
Looks inhuman!
I sometimes wonder though,
Who, was better,
Ronnie,
Dorian,
Nasser,
Its something I've often pondered.
-
Looks inhuman!
I sometimes wonder though,
Who, was better,
Ronnie,
Dorian,
Nasser,
Its something I've often pondered.
odd that that debate has never been on this site ??? ;D
-
With over 19500 sales it looks this guy has made quite a lot of money from copying other peoples work and selling it on Ebay.
-
The standards this man has set 15 yrs ago are still unmatched today.
-
The standards this man has set 15 yrs ago are still unmatched today.
yup.
ronnie was bone dry in 99.
flex was an oil bag.
-
yup.
ronnie was bone dry in 99.
flex was an oil bag.
Haha! Look at Flex's pathetic oil bag delts getting smoked by Big Ron
-
look how crap GUtler looks
amazing gifts from the judges he's received
-
no other bodybuilder in history can beat this :)
opinion's vairy..
-
opinion's vairy..
Are you saying that some argue Dorian was better ?
-
Are you saying that some argue Dorian was better ?
In a nutshell alot would say a Prime Yates was better, alot would say a Prime Coleman was Better, in this Particular Comparison Opinions will again vairy on who is better.
-
Looks inhuman!
I sometimes wonder though,
Who, was better,
Ronnie,
Dorian,
Nasser,
Its something I've often pondered.
I have in more quiet moments, gazing out at the vastness of space and trying to imbue life with any greater meaning, often thought the same things.
Who was the greatest sportsman between the two titans otherwise known as Ronnie and Dorian? a challenger appears, Nasser...oh how could i forget, surely all three are so great it is hard to form distinctions between them.
I really wish there were a place were i could express my opinions on the subject and vent some of my more complex thoughts. After all it is a subject of such great import all other philosophical musings become meaningless. The meaning of life, the greater mechanisms of the universe, higher cosmic powers, Meh.....Who waddled about with more mass and achieved the most glute striations, is the only pertinant question.
;D
On reflection Hulkster and Nd need to die for the greater good of the universe, such weirdness should not be allowed to persist.
-
I have in more quiet moments, gazing out at the vastness of space and trying to imbue life with any greater meaning, often thought the same things.
Who was the greatest sportsman between the two titans otherwise known as Ronnie and Dorian? a challenger appears, Nasser...oh how could i forget, surely all three are so great it is hard to form distinctions between them.
I really wish there were a place were i could express my opinions on the subject and vent some of my more complex thoughts. After all it is a subject of such great import all other philosophical musings become meaningless. The meaning of life, the greater mechanisms of the universe, higher cosmic powers, Meh.....Who waddled about with more mass and achieved the most glute striations, is the only pertinant question.
;D
On reflection Hulkster and Nd need to die for the greater good of the universe, such weirdness should not be allowed to persist.
Ok...
You've definitely given it more tought than me...
-
In a nutshell alot would say a Prime Yates was better, alot would say a Prime Coleman was Better, in this Particular Comparison Opinions will again vairy on who is better.
Yates does look phenomenal in that pic
But where would you place nasser in the grand scheme of things?
-
Yates does look phenomenal in that pic
But where would you place nasser in the grand scheme of things?
if you are making Reference to where would i place Nasser @ his best vs a Prime Coleman and Prime Yates... behind them both.... Due to Structural issues and the Obvious from the back, Great Bber @ his Best Massive, huge, etc, just not on Coleman's or Yates level keeping in mind we are talking about there Primes.
-
another insane shot from 99: :o
-
Ronnie, Dorian, Phil, Jay, all have huge structural flaws.
I'm trying to think who the most structurally sound Mr.O was, maybe Oliva or Zane.
-
Ronnie, Dorian, Phil, Jay, all have huge structural flaws.
I'm trying to think who the most structurally sound Mr.O was, maybe Oliva or Zane.
for pure symmetry it may be Samir.
-
Ronnie, Dorian, Phil, Jay, all have huge structural flaws.
I'm trying to think who the most structurally sound Mr.O was, maybe Oliva or Zane.
Oliva? No chance.
-
Sergio some 41 years ago !!!
WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
-
Rockell !
WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH
-
another insane shot from 99: :o
Yip one of the all time best right there, 98 imo just edges this shot due to paper thin skin that year
-
Yip one of the all time best right there, 98 imo just edges this shot due to paper thin skin that year
the thing when comparing ronnie 98 to 99 was that ronnie's quads were 10x better in 99.
bigger, fuller with way more sweep and most importantly, cuts:
his quads never looked this good in 98, which is why I think 99 has a big advantage:
he had the best quads onstage in 99.
probably not in 98
-
No he did have the Best Quads onstage @ the 98 Olympia, his Quad flare when FULLY flexed was Exceptional, dry, conditioned, paperthin skin etc his OVERALL Condition was Sharper than 99....imo he was @ his absolute best in 98, his Quads were exceptional That year as in they didnt over power the balance with calves as much as they did from 99 onwards, imo he was @ his Best that year and carried that amount of BW better than any other year under 250lbs, Massive, Conditioned and more importantly @ that stage as BALANCED as he ever was that day, that night in 1998 he was as good as it got before he went Mad with "size" if you want a Legit argument against Yates...1998 would be the year imo simply because he was still @ that point BALANCED with the outrageous OVERALL Condition needed to topple a Prime Yates.
-
the thing when comparing ronnie 98 to 99 was that ronnie's quads were 10x better in 99.
bigger, fuller with way more sweep and most importantly, cuts:
his quads never looked this good in 98, which is why I think 99 has a big advantage:
he had the best quads onstage in 99.
probably not in 98
Bigger sweep doesnt help Ronnie, it kills his balance even more so.
Why cant you understand that the whole point of having bigger quads is worthless if the calves dont grow to match?
-
Bigger sweep doesnt help Ronnie, it kills his balance even more so.
Why cant you understand that the whole point of having bigger quads is worthless if the calves dont grow to match?
I agree
Ronnie quads were horrible.
(http://www.teambodypro.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ronniecoleman2_lrg.jpg)
(http://bodybuildingnhealth.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/ronnie1.jpg)
(http://www.bigroncoleman.com/photos/2002olympia11.jpg)
-
Bigger sweep doesnt help Ronnie, it kills his balance even more so.
Why cant you understand that the whole point of having bigger quads is worthless if the calves dont grow to match?
why can't you understand that at 257 pounds his calves were in very good proportion to his quads:
::)
this isn't 300 pound ronnie
-
Ronnie quads were horrible.
(http://www.teambodypro.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ronniecoleman2_lrg.jpg)
I agree, horrible physique
-
that was the year he lost
compare to when he was actually good:
-
No he did have the Best Quads onstage @ the 98 Olympia, his Quad flare when FULLY flexed was Exceptional, dry, conditioned, paperthin skin etc his OVERALL Condition was Sharper than 99....imo he was @ his absolute best in 98, his Quads were exceptional That year as in they didnt over power the balance with calves as much as they did from 99 onwards, imo he was @ his Best that year and carried that amount of BW better than any other year under 250lbs, Massive, Conditioned and more importantly @ that stage as BALANCED as he ever was that day, that night in 1998 he was as good as it got before he went Mad with "size" if you want a Legit argument against Yates...1998 would be the year imo simply because he was still @ that point BALANCED with the outrageous OVERALL Condition needed to topple a Prime Yates.
I think he looked better at the 01 ASC than the 98 Mr. Olympia. He was the same weight and had the same conditioning, but his muscles looked fuller.
-
that was the year he lost
compare to when he was actually good:
Still look like shit ,him and Yates ruined bodybuilding.
(http://runkz.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/olympia.jpg)
(http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m1hardgP331qk5bhro1_500.jpg)
-
ronnie looks better than paris here:
-
I think he looked better at the 01 ASC than the 98 Mr. Olympia. He was the same weight and had the same conditioning, but his muscles looked fuller.
Maybe its a close thing those 2 years very close, i go with 98 due to his bf levels/dry/shredded everywhere and from the side, back he was as full as his frame could carry in terms of supporting that sort of weight and keeping his physique in check balance wise, there r u number of contests where he looked bigger or more impressive with very good conditioning, however again imo he was near untouchable in 1998 due to his total conditioning from the front, side and back and his waist was still small and taper spot-on, gyno aside perhaps one of the best physiques ever that year, a 1991 Haney, 1993 Yates and 1998 Coleman on the same stage would be the best of the best too close too call imo and all of them under 260lbs with waists in tact too boot.
-
why can't you understand that at 257 pounds his calves were in very good proportion to his quads:
::)
this isn't 300 pound ronnie
Uh... what?
He calves are fucking terrible. Just... terrible. The bigger his quads got, the more pronounced his failed calves were. You cant compare his 300 lb self to his 257 lb self and say "Well its better here so its ok", it was still terrible.
Look I think Ronnie is awesome dude but you need to face reality. 99 (as you admitted yourself, his quads blew up) made his imbalance issues 10x worse. There's a reason most people at those shows thought that 98 was his best showing. Youre literally trying to say his bigger quads in 99 are somehow more important than the dryness and balance that he lost. And you also seem to forget that BB shows are judged on a "part by part" basis.
-
ronnie looks better than paris here:
Ronnie never looked better than Paris you retard. He had way too many structural flaws and zero flow.
-
I agree
Ronnie quads were horrible.
(http://www.teambodypro.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ronniecoleman2_lrg.jpg)
(http://bodybuildingnhealth.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/ronnie1.jpg)
(http://www.bigroncoleman.com/photos/2002olympia11.jpg)
Pointless picture to use, he's clearly on the wrong end of some heinous nerve damage!
-
Ronnie never looked better than Paris you retard. He had way too many structural flaws and zero flow.
you must be gay
outed.