Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: affeman on July 31, 2012, 03:42:19 PM

Title: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: affeman on July 31, 2012, 03:42:19 PM
Sure, ugly as hell. But dude had serious size and conditioning.

(http://www.bodybuildingfanatic.com/heiko-kallbach.jpg)
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Parker on July 31, 2012, 03:51:18 PM
He was like if someone spliced Roland Cziorlock and That other German (I forgot his name, the one wh worked for Audi and had flat top---damn, I forgot), and left a huge gut on the result.

I thought he would do better.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Schmoff on July 31, 2012, 03:54:38 PM
you mean ugliness?

yes, he is

 :-X
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: michael arvilla on July 31, 2012, 04:19:03 PM
                                  Heiko!!!!
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Moen on July 31, 2012, 05:38:52 PM
Wat happened to the Berlin Wall anyway  ???
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: d0nny2600 on July 31, 2012, 06:00:51 PM
He was an avid fan of synthol
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: jaejonna on July 31, 2012, 06:32:09 PM
No

Huge gut, oil, a symmetrical as a Picasso but worth 5 bucks..
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: BayGBM on July 31, 2012, 09:34:04 PM
Back in the day he was freaky and schmoetastic!
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on July 31, 2012, 09:37:31 PM
The oil turned on him
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Megalodon on July 31, 2012, 10:14:03 PM
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Dr Kincaid on July 31, 2012, 11:31:15 PM
A good easy to achieve everyday look.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Tito24 on July 31, 2012, 11:34:26 PM
im pretty sure he injected steroids at some stage in life
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Anglo on August 01, 2012, 02:07:20 AM
.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Mitch on August 01, 2012, 02:12:56 AM
Back in the day he was freaky and schmoetastic!
I saw dead beefs which were looking more healthy :-\

Quote
He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.
This. All veins, no muscle separation.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Dr Dutch on August 01, 2012, 02:33:14 AM

(http://www.bodybuildingfanatic.com/heiko-kallbach.jpg)
Is he participating in this year's Olympics ?
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Super Natural on August 01, 2012, 02:58:33 AM
Sure, ugly as hell. But dude had serious size and conditioning.

(http://www.bodybuildingfanatic.com/heiko-kallbach.jpg)

Looks good for a natural.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: bic_staedtler on August 01, 2012, 03:18:30 AM
I remember this fucking nightmare monstrosity of a human being.  Ugly that goes right down to the bone. 
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: _bruce_ on August 01, 2012, 04:02:02 AM
Looks good for a natural.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: falco on August 01, 2012, 08:13:05 AM
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.

Munzer looked "healthy" (lol) but that didn't stoped him to die from steroid abuse.
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Megalodon on August 01, 2012, 09:07:09 AM
Munzer looked "healthy" (lol) but that didn't stoped him to die from steroid abuse.

Munzer didn't die of steroid abuse.

Take Arnold, for example, but there are thousands of bodybuilders with visible pectoral/deltoid muscle fibers/striations. Munzer is the most extreme, but yeah, his death clouds the issue. ;D








Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Moen on August 01, 2012, 09:34:35 AM
We need pics of Heiko wearing high heels! Don't even try and convince me he never did!
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: BayGBM on August 01, 2012, 09:38:00 AM
I saw dead beefs which were looking more healthy :-\
This. All veins, no muscle separation.

Tier 2 at his peak!  ;D
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: affeman on August 01, 2012, 02:30:03 PM
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.

What about this guy??

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/littlearm/2009%20Ironman/ironman09_faour1.jpg)
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Moen on August 01, 2012, 02:38:29 PM
What about this guy??

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/littlearm/2009%20Ironman/ironman09_faour1.jpg)

Would look great wearing high heels as well  :P
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: Megalodon on August 01, 2012, 03:05:21 PM
What about this guy??

He'd be unbeatable if his circulatory system were a little more obstructed. ;D
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: BayGBM on August 01, 2012, 03:46:38 PM
What about this guy??

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v35/littlearm/2009%20Ironman/ironman09_faour1.jpg)

He is available . . . but he is tier 5.  :-\
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: bigjim on August 01, 2012, 03:54:28 PM
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.

An unhealthy look? Are you fucking kidding Munzer is dead. Real healthy look that causes death  ::)
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: BIG DUB on August 01, 2012, 11:17:19 PM
He was like if someone spliced Roland Cziorlock and That other German (I forgot his name, the one wh worked for Audi and had flat top---damn, I forgot), and left a huge gut on the result.

I thought he would do better.

0:21 in..

Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: OneManGang on August 02, 2012, 01:19:28 AM
He'd be unbeatable if his circulatory system were a little more obstructed. ;D

LOL!!!  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
Post by: falco on August 02, 2012, 02:29:44 AM
Munzer didn't die of steroid abuse.

Take Arnold, for example, but there are thousands of bodybuilders with visible pectoral/deltoid muscle fibers/striations. Munzer is the most extreme, but yeah, his death clouds the issue. ;D


Sure dehydration was the culprit ::)

The authopsy revealed that he had several tumors in his liver, organ that melted during the procedure.
I don't believe that diuretics and to much chicken breasts was the cause.