Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: emerald37 on October 16, 2012, 05:00:23 PM
-
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh3070esatamMh4A1b
-
I am guessing the guys were the ones wearing hot pink and yoga pants.
Funny what the world has come to...
-
I am guessing the guys were the ones wearing hot pink and yoga pants.
Funny what the world has come to...
Yes!
-
Gay of peace
-
One thing I gotta commend east European countries and Russia is that they are anti-gay propaganda. They are not letting that filth sprout in their countries..
-
One thing I gotta commend east European countries and Russia is that they are anti-gay propaganda. They are not letting that filth sprout in their countries..
Federal city of St. Petersburg, Rossiya banned gay-propaganda few months ago.
That's only one city though.... republics often enjoy wide autonomy on these things and can do this kind of decisions independently.
Hard-line citizens even sued Madonna after she made "pro-gay statements" at his concert in St. Peterburg ;D ;D
Beautiful city full of history and astonishing czarist-era architecure btw
(http://0.tqn.com/d/cruises/1/0/J/u/3/City_Hall2.JPG)
-
i've had 5 different polish f@gs try to pick me up here in poland over the past few years, and none of these incidents took place in gay bars :-X
-
i've had 5 different polish f@gs try to pick me up here in poland over the past few years, and none of these incidents took place in gay bars :-X
You should be just happy my friend - at least you appear attractive to someone :D
Just kiddin' just kiddin' ;D
-
You should be just happy my friend - at least you appear attractive to someone :D
Just kiddin' just kiddin' ;D
i hear ya man, and when a girl tells me that she finds me attractive i usually ask her "so did you forget to wear your glasses today?" ;D ;D ;D
-
I never understand what the hell they are saying in these vids!
-
god damnit i'm so sick of external links. the last four fucking threads i've clicked have been that.
-
Mass, are you Russian or Fin?
-
I am guessing the guys were the ones wearing hot pink and yoga pants.
Funny what the world has come to...
Which is why Muslims like you want to take world back to the 12th century, when women were property and every good Muslim owned at least one slave. In accordance to the will of allah, of course.
-
Which is why Muslims like you want to take world back to the 12th century, when women were property and every good Muslim owned at least one slave. In accordance to the will of allah, of course.
lol i don't know where you clowns get your information from but Islam came in the 7th century. And women are able to own their property, run their own businesses, men cannot take their wealth that they earn. We don't own slaves lol, and Islam came to encourage people to abandon slavery as it was so widespread. Over and over again freeing slaves was emphasized. Muhammad's family alone freed 35000 slaves approximately. Their 'masters' who owned them, Muhammad, his famly, etc... they would pay their freedom so they would be free.
The first caller to prayer, was Bilal, an ethiopian slave who was freed and he became one of the strongest and most well known Muslim personalities who became above his 'master'.
Anyways :) You just make yourself sound foolish. Islam is growing and spreading, 1/4 of the 4 million american muslims are converts. The fastest rate of conversion is amongst white university educated women.
Do you think that if what you are saying is true that these women would not be converting to islam, yet they are the ones leading the conversion numbers.
I guess you prefer living in the so called 'modern' way where homosexuals 'marry' and 'adopt' children. A bunch of men who use their tool in each other's shit holes. Women who use dildos instead of being with a man. Yeah. Modern ::)
Funny, such logic. They must force legal laws to 'allow them' to 'marry'.. and they must 'adopt' since DUH they can't have children it's not the way life is suppose to be. It's merely perversion and people who arrogantly obey their sick misguided desires.
-
One thing I gotta commend east European countries and Russia is that they are anti-gay propaganda. They are not letting that filth sprout in their countries..
SO.....is it the religion of peace or the religion of intolerance. I'll go with intolerance for 500 alex
-
;D were these the guys?
-
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19999222
::)
Defense of Marriage Act struck down by New York court
A US law defining marriage as being only between one man and one woman has been struck down by a second appeal court, this time in New York.
The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2 to 1 that the Defense of Marriage Act (Doma) is unconstitutional.
The act denies legally married gay couples federal benefits including the ability to file joint tax returns.
A Boston court unanimously ruled against Doma in May. The Supreme Court is expected to consider it next year.
Only it can issue final rulings on whether laws passed by the US Congress are constitutional or not.
In 2011, President Barack Obama instructed the Department of Justice not to defend the law, and earlier this year he announced that he supported the right of gays to marry.
Equal protection clause
The New York ruling came in a case brought by Edith Windsor, who sued the government in 2010 after being told to pay $363,053 (£224,940) in federal estate tax after her wife died.
The couple had been partners for 44 years and had married in Canada in 2007.
The majority opinion, written by Judge Dennis Jacobs, said that Doma's "classification of same-sex spouses was not substantially related to an important government interest" and therefore violated the equal protection clause of the US Constitution.
Doma touches more than 1,000 federal laws, Judge Jacobs said, arguing that "homosexuals are not in a position to adequately protect themselves from the discriminatory wishes of the majoritarian public".
He also rejected arguments that the definition of marriage was traditional.
"Even if preserving tradition were in itself an important goal, Doma is not a means to achieve it."
In his dissent, Judge Chester Straub said that the government could only change its understanding of marriage if the American people instructed them to do so through legislation.
"Courts should not intervene where there is a robust political debate because doing so poisons the political well, imposing a destructive anti-majoritarian constitutional ruling on a vigorous debate," he said.
The decision came less than a month after the court heard arguments on 27 September.
The Supreme Court is expected to take up a case on Doma as well as an ongoing legal wrangle over a gay marriage ban in the state of California, a law known as Proposition 8.
Disgusting. Western society regressing not progressing.
-
::) ::) ::) ::)
-
fat slob deserved a beating
if guys can beat you up, you're a homo
-
Which is why Muslims like you want to take world back to the 12th century, when women were property and every good Muslim owned at least one slave. In accordance to the will of allah, of course.
I don't have any use for those towel headed camel jockeys, but they do have the right attitude about ankle grabbers.
-
lol
lol
they shoulda taken him back to the rainbow castle for a gang bang!
-
They even slap like faggs
-
I guess you prefer living in the so called 'modern' way where homosexuals 'marry' and 'adopt' children. A bunch of men who use their tool in each other's shit holes. Women who use dildos instead of being with a man. Yeah. Modern ::)
How does a gay man's lifestyle affect you?
What is wrong with two men marrying and settling down in a monogamous loving relationship?
I'd rather see a gay man marry another man and be true to who he is than have him pretend to be something he is not, marry a woman and ruin both their lives.
As for what two men do in the privacy of their bedrooms (no matter how distasteful to me) is none of my business. As for women using dildos... I think you may be watching too much porn. ;) I don't personally know what lesbians are into, ...but common sense and logic tells me it is not dildos. if they wanted to be penetrated, I doubt they'd be lesbians.
Funny, such logic. They must force legal laws to 'allow them' to 'marry'.. and they must 'adopt' since DUH they can't have children it's not the way life is suppose to be.
The reason laws are in place to 'allow them' to 'marry' is because of intolerant bigoted people who cannot simply allow people to live their lives even though these people are having no negative impact on them.
It's merely perversion and people who arrogantly obey their sick misguided desires.
Let us look at the word "desire". It stem from two words: de meaning OF, and sire meaning FATHER. Therefore the word desire means of the father. A man would not desire (want) another man, unless that desire was placed there of the father. Meaning God made them Gay, for whatever reason or purpose, is not for you or I, or anyone else to judge. True their coupling cannot produce offspring, ...but then again, alot of heterosexual couplings can't produce offspring either. I don't think it is for you or I to judge. Their desires may not be our own, ...but they are no less worthy of respect, common courtesy, dignity and equality. In a messed up world where many children don't have loving families or parents, the idea that they'd be better off stuck in some cold institution, rather than be raised in a loving home by a caring dedicated same sex couple who wants to take care of them is the real perversion imo
-
What is wrong with two men marrying and settling down in a monogamous loving relationship?
The fact that it's not a marriage, a marriage constitutes a male and female that can produce a child. When has a male and male produced a child?
Some plain common sense. Just another example of western society on the mental and moral decline.
After all there are people who aplaud this as a great way for 'population control' ::)
And whether it's a dildo or a finger doing the action, it's all the same.
Women with two holes doing each other or men with two sticks doing each other in the wrong holes.
No matter which way you spin it, it's an action, no one is born doing this just as no one is born a killer, or a thief, or a rapist, etc... people are shaped into these things. On the other hand male and female gender exist for a reason.
It's a mental sickness that has lead people to accept this mental sickness of homosexuality.
-
Let us look at the word "desire". It stem from two words: de meaning OF, and sire meaning FATHER. Therefore the word desire means of the father.
Not choosing sides, but the etymology above is a bit forced, if not contentious. 'Desire' is a Romantic term, since it derives from the Romans via Latin. 'Desire' conveys the sense of a volitional wish:
from the Online Etymological Dictionary: desire (v.) early 13c., from O.Fr. desirrer (12c.) "wish, desire, long for," from L. desiderare "long for, wish for; demand, expect," original sense perhaps "await what the stars will bring," from the phrase de sidere "from the stars," from sidus (gen. sideris) "heavenly body, star, constellation" [as in, wishing on a star] (but see consider). Related: Desired; desiring. The noun is attested from c.1300, from O.Fr. desir, from desirer; sense of "lust" is first recorded mid-14c.
The Greek sense of 'desire' is more complicated (it's tied to erotic love, i.e., the objectification of what one wishes to possess), but I believe the term you have in mind is 'thelo,' i.e., "to desire, to will, to wish."
Although 'thelo' is referenced in theological studies of Biblical Greek, any subsequent connection or application of 'desire' to the Father or the Lord, as in the case of the Will of God (to make manifest what He desires), might well be an example of eisegesis. If our understanding of 'desire' appeals to its Western etymology, we have to note that the ancient Greeks and Romans were not Christians, and that the sense of the term was tweaked to suit medieval meditations of theological problems (as well as modern appropriations and distortions, whether Liberal, Progressive, Conservative, or what have you).
-
The fact that it's not a marriage, a marriage constitutes a male and female that can produce a child. When has a male and male produced a child?
Some plain common sense. Just another example of western society on the mental and moral decline.
After all there are people who aplaud this as a great way for 'population control' ::)
And whether it's a dildo or a finger doing the action, it's all the same.
Women with two holes doing each other or men with two sticks doing each other in the wrong holes.
No matter which way you spin it, it's an action, no one is born doing this just as no one is born a killer, or a thief, or a rapist, etc... people are shaped into these things. On the other hand male and female gender exist for a reason.
It's a mental sickness that has lead people to accept this mental sickness of homosexuality.
i will never, ever ever in my life understand why anybody gives a hot fuck about what other consenting adults do in the bedroom
-
i will never, ever ever in my life understand why anybody gives a hot fuck about what other consenting adults do in the bedroom
I will never understand why people choose to be queers...or think that those sick fucks should have rights.
-
No matter which way you spin it, it's an action, no one is born doing this just as no one is born a killer, or a thief, or a rapist, etc... people are shaped into these things. On the other hand male and female gender exist for a reason.
And in the case of infertility of a heterosexual couple or one using contraceptives, ...no one is born of those couplings either. Or are you of the school of thought that says sex is for procreation only?
It's a mental sickness that has lead people to accept this mental sickness of homosexuality.
If it is a mental sickness that has led to my acceptance of homosexuals, then guilty as charged.
In a world gone mad and rampant with mental illness, I prefer to have a mental illness that is tolerant & accepting of human being who simply want to express their love for each other, than succumb to the mental illness of intolerant bigotry and discrimination against human beings who are simply different.
How on earth can I fault a MAN for being attracted to the same thing that I am attracted to?
That in itself is the height of hypocrisy. That's like YOU saying their are certain things and qualities about your wife that you find / found appealing, ...but Ellen Degeneres is not allowed to find those very same things / qualities appealing? Gimme a break! If I prefer my partner / companion to be strong & manly, I can't fault someone for prefering that as well.
-
Not choosing sides, but the etymology above is a bit forced, if not contentious. 'Desire' is a Romantic term, since it derives from the Romans via Latin. 'Desire' conveys the sense of a volitional wish:
from the Online Etymological Dictionary: desire (v.) early 13c., from O.Fr. desirrer (12c.) "wish, desire, long for," from L. desiderare "long for, wish for; demand, expect," original sense perhaps "await what the stars will bring," from the phrase de sidere "from the stars," from sidus (gen. sideris) "heavenly body, star, constellation" [as in, wishing on a star] (but see consider). Related: Desired; desiring. The noun is attested from c.1300, from O.Fr. desir, from desirer; sense of "lust" is first recorded mid-14c.
The Greek sense of 'desire' is more complicated (it's tied to erotic love, i.e., the objectification of what one wishes to possess), but I believe the term you have in mind is 'thelo,' i.e., "to desire, to will, to wish."
Although 'thelo' is referenced in theological studies of Biblical Greek, any subsequent connection or application of 'desire' to the Father or the Lord, as in the case of the Will of God (to make manifest what He desires), might well be an example of eisegesis. If our understanding of 'desire' appeals to its Western etymology, we have to note that the ancient Greeks and Romans were not Christians, and that the sense of the term was tweaked to suit medieval meditations of theological problems (as well as modern appropriations and distortions, whether Liberal, Progressive, Conservative, or what have you).
shhh.... perhaps, ...but stop making me have to use a dictionary to figure out what you're saying. :P
-
I will never understand why people choose to be queers...or think that those sick fucks should have rights.
Because they're masochists who love being physically & verbally abused, as well as being discriminated against by self-righteous bigots who are not content to live & let live. ::)
-
The fact that it's not a marriage, a marriage constitutes a male and female that can produce a child. When has a male and male produced a child?
Actually, the concept of marriage originally had nothing to do with romantic love but was merely contractural in nature. A way to establish ownership & inheritance rights. It was a merging of wealth between families, nothing more, ...nothing less. This clear cut definition of contractural obligations & rights is something not enjoyed by all. What you propose is simply legislated discrimination plain & simple, ...and that is WRONG!
-
And in the case of infertility of a heterosexual couple or one using contraceptives, ...no one is born of those couplings either. Or are you of the school of thought that says sex is for procreation only?
Yes we can use our knowledge of science to fix what is not working in an actual male and a female.
On the other hand using a 'donor' of ANOTHER woman and using that woman as a 'surrogate mother' still does not change the fact that a male and male will NEVER produce a child.
No matter how you look at it, what you are doing is FORCING this. They want to fuck each other's holes period and they want justification for it, tax deductions, etc...
If a man gets 'srs' sexual reassignment surgery and gets his dick chopped off and takes all the estrogens and anti testosterones, and all the sexy makeup to make themselves look like a woman, they will still be a farce, they will never be a woman because they are BORN A MAN and THEY ARE A MAN. The end.
They will never grow a uterus because they are a male.
If it is a mental sickness that has led to my acceptance of homosexuals, then guilty as charged.
In a world gone mad and rampant with mental illness, I prefer to have a mental illness that is tolerant & accepting of human being who simply want to express their love for each other, than succumb to the mental illness of intolerant bigotry and discrimination against human beings who are simply different.
How on earth can I fault a MAN for being attracted to the same thing that I am attracted to?
That in itself is the height of hypocrisy. That's like YOU saying their are certain things and qualities about your wife that you find / found appealing, ...but Ellen Degeneres is not allowed to find those very same things / qualities appealing? Gimme a break! If I prefer my partner / companion to be strong & manly, I can't fault someone for prefering that as well.
Oh come on now. "Discrimination". Because they cry a river over their act and have militarized and mobilized themselves in politics to push for homosexuality in public life?
There's a difference in discrimination of say race, what you are, and what you DO such as an act be it theft, homosexuality, corruption, cheating, etc... These are ACTS that you CHOOSE.
They are being discriminated for their action not for who they are and rightly so. It is a demented action and it is only OKAY because western society has endorsed man made laws that make it so even if it goes against common sense.
The same arguments some day could be used for beastiality, necrophilia and all other sorts of perverse desires some humans can develop.
It degenerates to philospohical debate but does not change the facts that it is indeed misguided perversion. A living man and a living woman are the only ones capable of forming a healthy family and producing children that won't be confused when they grow up saying wait you guys used another woman to give birth to me but you are both men? Big wtf.
Just for a moment think of what impact it'll have on a child seeing two men kissing and fondling each other? Or two women kissing and fondling each other? You think for a moment it will not have an effect on the child?
-
And just to add one more thing, the so called arguments of 'born this way' is bs as part of gay propaganda is also saying this is a 'life style choice'. A contradiction. It is a CHOSEN act.
The whole 'born gay' is the same bs as believing in God or disbelieving in God is in our dna. How is it that atheists then become believers or vice versa? It is the same guy (I forget his name) who came up with these claims of it being in dna hence 'born this way'.
Imagine then, that people are literally 'born' criminals, or 'born' thieves, or 'born' killers, therefore it's justifable because they were oh.. born this way. No one is BORN into these things, they are RAISED, developed, shaped into these things.
If you ask most transgender people about their 'journey' you will find out most of them started crossdressing from a young age, secretly or even encouraged by their care takers (parents, grandparents, whoevers).
In contrast to crossdressers of the past who kept it 'in the closet' now there are venues where they take it a step further with parades, get togethers, the internet, etc... Society ENCOURAGES it, so it further shapes these people.
Even television, media, movies, almost every tv series now a days HAS to have a gay in it. Movies have normalized the act/behaviours through commedy movies making it 'funny' and 'enjoyable', hence acceptable through humor.
Hence this whole pro-gay epidemic is an invested effort of the past two three decades of subliminal programming, propaganda and political endorsment.
The original DSM (manual of psychiatry) indeed dubbed it a mental disease but for political reasons it was REMOVED and renamed as a 'life style choice'. Yet alot of people WERE 'cured' from it by psychiatrists, but no one talks about that.
-
Just for a moment think of what impact it'll have on a child seeing two men kissing and fondling each other? Or two women kissing and fondling each other? You think for a moment it will not have an effect on the child?
I'd rather not thankyouverymuch. And while I'm at it, I will say that I don't think it is appropriate for a child to be seeing a heterosexual couple kissing & fondling each other either. Sexual acts between adults should remain between adults, ...and behind closed doors. Children should have nothing to do with it.
By your line of reasoning a healthy heterosexual couple who chooses never to have children should not be allowed to marry because they too will not reproduce. It is pure nonsense.
-
Ahmed, you have your prejudices towards homosexuality. That is clear.
I have my own feeling & thoughts on the issue. I am not going to get you to change your mind on this, ...and you sure as heck will not be changing mine. The best we can say is we agree to disagree. I don't think any further discussion on the subject is merited.
-
I'd rather not thankyouverymuch. And while I'm at it, I will say that I don't think it is appropriate for a child to be seeing a heterosexual couple kissing & fondling each other either. Sexual acts between adults should remain between adults, ...and behind closed doors. Children should have nothing to do with it.
Oh come on now, your parents never hugged, kissed in front of you? Please... I wasn't saying 'fuck in front of them'.
By your line of reasoning a healthy heterosexual couple who chooses never to have children should not be allowed to marry because they too will not reproduce. It is pure nonsense.
lol, nope that's maybe your understanding and line of thought.
My wife and I cannot have children but I will not use another 'surrogate' woman or donor to have a child. I still remain with my wife. However it is incomparable. I am with a WOMAN as meant to be. God created man and woman. Not fag and fag.
I am avoiding turning it into religious discussion but most religious scripts frown upon homosexuality as an ill of society just as theft, murder, etc... it is an action, a chosen act, performed by the will of a person. As far as abrahamic religions go Sodom and Gomorah was destroyed by God for this very act they were famous for. It's not like it's something new. We are not progressing in western society but regressing.
On the other hand even if you look at it from an atheistic evolutionary argument, humanity would seize to exist. If you jam packed all gay guys on an island they would die off. The end.
It is therefore a forced ACT, hence perverse desires being forced to be allowed and permitted in society by man made laws.
-
Oh come on now, your parents never hugged, kissed in front of you? Please... I wasn't saying 'fuck in front of them'.
lol, nope that's maybe your understanding and line of thought.
My wife and I cannot have children but I will not use another 'surrogate' woman or donor to have a child. I still remain with my wife. However it is incomparable. I am with a WOMAN as meant to be. God created man and woman. Not fag and fag.
I am avoiding turning it into religious discussion but most religious scripts frown upon homosexuality as an ill of society just as theft, murder, etc... it is an action, a chosen act, performed by the will of a person. As far as abrahamic religions go Sodom and Gomorah was destroyed by God for this very act.
On the other hand even if you look at it from an atheistic evolutionary argument, humanity would seize to exist. If you jam packed all gay guys on an island they would die off. The end.
It is therefore a forced ACT, hence perverse desires being forced to be allowed and permitted in society by man made laws.
Like I said, ...we have our positions. I will respect your right to whatever conclusion you come to, ...regardless of how assinine, or bigoted it is. You will not persuade me to your reasoning, so let's simply choose to respect each other's right to our own opinions, and agree to disagree.
-
Ahmed, you have your prejudices towards homosexuality. That is clear.
I have my own feeling & thoughts on the issue. I am not going to get you to change your mind on this, ...and you sure as heck will not be changing mine. The best we can say is we agree to disagree. I don't think any further discussion on the subject is merited.
I am using intellect and not having 'prejudice' but rational facts. I have been surrounded by gays, transgenders, etc... at college and I used to debate their 'arguments' for why they do what they do in many of the social and political classes.
It boils down to them heading head first through the wall in wanting to do this and wanting to do it period. It has nothing to do with being born that way or this way. They are born a man, or they are born a woman. They want the whole world to accept their action, that's all it is.
No one is born with the desire for the same gender. It goes against our programming and forget religion, goes against science if you simply look at it from a procreative perspective.
Since we have God given intellect, we can do pretty retarded things or we can do pretty smart things but it is OUR choices. They happen to make pretty retarded choices, based on their desires and nothing else.
They are just heading head first through the wall hard with their desire to this act and have mobilized to endorse it.
It is no different than certain groups of people mobilizing to do a certain act such as war, weapons of mass destruction, iraq, etc... and no matter how stupid, how demented, how full of lies and deception it is, they keep heading head first through the wall to do it and they will do it.
These are actions that are shaped over time.
-
I am using intellect and not having 'prejudice' but rational facts. I have been surrounded by gays, transgenders, etc... at college and I used to debate their 'arguments' for why they do what they do in many of the social and political classes.
It boils down to them heading head first through the wall in wanting to do this and wanting to do it period. It has nothing to do with being born that way or this way. They are born a man, or they are born a woman. They want the whole world to accept their action, that's all it is.
You're really beginning to annoy me. >:(
Did you know you're displaying some classical sign of mental illness yourself?
-
You're really beginning to annoy me. >:(
Did you know you're displaying some classical sign of mental illness yourself?
So that's your argument because I reject the act/action of homosexuality ::)
Maybe if homosexuals are 'born this way' they shouldn't have testicles either. Why produce sperm?
The bottom line is, homosexuality is something that is being forced up on society. You have fallen victim to the decades of subliminal programming, propaganda, and political activism of homosexual groups. In the UK a priest was jailed and fined for saying homosexuality is a sin. Ironically he had to go to the european court of human rights.
-
You're really beginning to annoy me. >:(
Did you know you're displaying some classical sign of mental illness yourself?
pot meet kettle
-
Because they're masochists who love being physically & verbally abused, as well as being discriminated against by self-righteous bigots who are not content to live & let live. ::)
shut up bitch i'm content to let all queers die of AIDS
-
So that's your argument because I reject the act/action of homosexuality ::)
No that is not my argument. You don't seem to understand, ...I have stopped arguing.
You've made your point, and stated your beliefs. I have stated mine.
Any further attempts to re-state your position, do not serve to convince me, or sway me to your position. They simply serve to annoy, and are made in vain. THAT is why I'm finding you to be annoying (on THIS particular subject)
-
i've had 5 different polish f@gs try to pick me up here in poland over the past few years, and none of these incidents took place in gay bars :-X
you gota stop parading around in that pink thong by the pool, its like honey to those beez
-
you gota stop parading around in that pink thong by the pool, its like honey to those beez
;D ;D ;D
-
I will never understand why people choose to be queers...or think that those sick fucks should have rights.
this is why america can't have nice things
and also if you bite i'll blow your brains out
stay thirsty my friend
-
shut up bitch i'm content to let all queers die of AIDS
http://www.theonion.com/articles/why-do-all-these-homosexuals-keep-sucking-my-cock,11150/
-
this is why america can't have nice things
and also if you bite i'll blow your brains out
stay thirsty my friend
stfu you queer retarded savage
-
stfu you queer retarded savage
that's hardly fair. i'm not retarded.