Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 29, 2012, 09:38:33 AM
-
R - 50%
O - 48%
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/ohio/election_2012_ohio_president
Seems like people won't go for an accomplice to murder.
-
Too bad thats about as credible as Fox News
-
wtf is o-i-h-o?
-
Too bad thats about as credible as Fox News
::)
Just a poll, man. Rass. has been pretty accurate in the past.
-
Too bad thats about as credible as Fox News
Maybe you should buy Fox and show em' how to do it. Hahaha
-
wtf is o-i-h-o?
It's how Obama spelled it during one of his campaign stops. Seriously.
-
Why is Ras not credible? What can yo point to specifically to discredit their work?
-
High IQ's in action, LOL...
-
I'm in manufacturing Coach. I guarantee you have items in your home from factories I am invested in.
Maybe you should buy Fox and show em' how to do it. Hahaha
-
High IQ's in action, LOL...
And, if that weren't bad enough, Rasmussen has Romney up two (50-48). A Cincinnati Enquirer poll has it tied at 49.
-
::)
Just a poll, man. Rass. has been pretty accurate in the past.
not really Rasmussen Poll 11/3/08 - McCain and Obama Tied in Ohio obama won by 51 to 46 that blows that theory out of the water
-
I'm in manufacturing Coach. I guarantee you have items in your home from factories I am invested in.
And??
-
not really Rasmussen Poll 11/3/08 - McCain and Obama Tied in Ohio obama won by 51 to 46 that blows that theory out of the water
That's not even relevant in this race. Obama didn't have a record (he didn't have much of anything but people still bought into it) now he has a record. (it should be a police record)
-
Hes a paid commentator on Fox News. Need i say more? 15% of Fox news watchers think Mitt Romney killed Osama bin Laden (im not kidding either)
Why is Ras not credible? What can yo point to specifically to discredit their work?
-
How is it not relevant, they were off by 5 points. You seriously are retarded too aint ya?
That's not even relevant in this race. Obama didn't have a record (he didn't have much of anything but people still bought into it) now he has a record. (it should be a police record)
-
That's not even relevant in this race. Obama didn't have a record (he didn't have much of anything but people still bought into it) now he has a record. (it should be a police record)
are you retarded,what does that have to do with rass having it tied :D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Hes a paid commentator on Fox News. Need i say more? 15% of Fox news watchers think Mitt Romney killed Osama bin Laden (im not kidding either)
You and alike need to get off the Fox news bullshit. It's as bad as blaming Bush. Every cable and network news are liberal mainstream and the one's who get it right are the ones you blame. One right of center network out of everyone else and FOX are the ones you trash....I wonder why.
-
Polls are commissioned by a number of media outlets...should I reflexively ignore polls commissioned by the sources I don't like? Or should I look at the internals...methodology, sample size, MOE, party affiliation of respondents...before passig judgement?
-
::)
Just a poll, man. Rass. has been pretty accurate in the past.
not really Rasmussen Poll 11/3/08 - McCain and Obama Tied in Ohio obama won by 51 to 46 that blows that theory out of the water
-
High IQ's in action, LOL...
my fucking god you are a simpleton.
-
You and alike need to get off the Fox news bullshit. It's as bad as blaming Bush. Every cable and network news are liberal mainstream and the one's who get it right are the ones you blame. One right of center network out of everyone else and FOX are the ones you trash....I wonder why.
Romney killed bin Laden?
-
not really Rasmussen Poll 11/3/08 - McCain and Obama Tied in Ohio obama won by 51 to 46 that blows that theory out of the water
Yes, really.
-
How is it not relevant, they were off by 5 points. You seriously are retarded too aint ya?
So was PPP in the Wisconsin recall. They had Walker up 2; he won by 7.
Going into the weekend, PPP and others had the race "too close to call".
-
Polls are commissioned by a number of media outlets...should I reflexively ignore polls commissioned by the sources I don't like? Or should I look at the internals...methodology, sample size, MOE, party affiliation of respondents...before passig judgement?
No poll gets it exactly right. Each organization's predictions will be off by a certain amount which we in turn can use as a metric for that organization's 'accuracy.' Because they'll all be off, it is helpful to smooth out the bumps in the data and do a 'metapoll' that pools all of the results together rather than take the result of any one organization as sancrosanct. That's what our friends at RCP do on a regular basis.
1. RCP's data still indicate an Obama victory is in the works, and has indicated as much for over a year. I hate to be overly deterministic about this but the data is clear. RCP's 'No Toss-up States' map has had the same outcome -- with minor variations in electoral college vote distribution -- since before Romney was the nominee. This state of affairs hasn't changed. Romney's rise in the polls means either there has been regression toward the mean or his debate performance really did have an impact, but, in any case, neither has been enough to change the fundamentals.
2. If we were to take the results from a single organization as sancrosanct -- something I just said we shouldn't do -- we would presumably want to look at the accuracy of such organizations and carefully make a choice. And this in turn implies that we would avoid selecting an organization that consistently oversamples one of the parties and which had virtually the least accurate results of all polling organizations during the last election cycle (i.e., Rasmussen).
-
Hes a paid commentator on Fox News. Need i say more? 15% of Fox news watchers think Mitt Romney killed Osama bin Laden (im not kidding either)
99% of democrats think that Al Gore invented the internet.
-
No poll gets it exactly right. Each organization's predictions will be off by a certain amount which we in turn can use as a metric for that organization's 'accuracy.' Because they'll all be off, it is helpful to smooth out the bumps in the data and do a 'metapoll' that pools all of the results together rather than take the result of any one organization as sancrosanct. That's what our friends at RCP do on a regular basis.
1. RCP's data still indicate an Obama victory is in the works, and has indicated as much for over a year. I hate to be overly deterministic about this but the data is clear. RCP's 'No Toss-up States' map has had the same outcome -- with minor variations in electoral college vote distribution -- since before Romney was the nominee. This state of affairs hasn't changed. Romney's rise in the polls means either there has been regression toward the mean or his debate performance really did have an impact, but, in any case, neither has been enough to change the fundamentals.
2. If we were to take the results from a single organization as sancrosanct -- something I just said we shouldn't do -- we would presumably want to look at the accuracy of such organizations and carefully make a choice. And this in turn implies that we would avoid selecting an organization that consistently oversamples one of the parties and which had virtually the least accurate results of all polling organizations during the last election cycle (i.e., Rasmussen).
So Rasmussen was the least accurate pool last election?
Thats a leftwing pool right?;)
-
Amazing
-
Amazing
fox news poll ??? :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Amazing
Funny how the navy seals, CIA, joint terrorist task force, W, etc were not included in that.
Obama had nothing to do w bin laden raid wahtsoever
-
Funny how the navy seals, CIA, joint terrorist task force, W, etc were not included in that.
Obama had nothing to do w bin laden raid wahtsoever
he's the pres the buck stops with him,or for the repubs is that only when it;s something bad :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
-
Joe... Spell the state properly!!!!
>:(
-
he's the pres the buck stops with him,or for the repubs is that only when it;s something bad :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Except not on lybia, egypt, solyndra, the billions in fraud in the stim bill, the more deathas in 3 years in afghanistan than 8 under W, etc etc right?
-
Except not on lybia, egypt, solyndra, the billions in fraud in the stim bill, the more deathas in 3 years in afghanistan than 8 under W, etc etc right?
Blacken getting the spit slapped out of him.
-
So Rasmussen was the least accurate pool last election?
Thats a leftwing pool right?;)
It was near the very bottom of the list but wasn't the single worst.
-
Blacken getting the spit slapped out of him.
-
Amazing
Ridiculous, it was the bush policies + the seals that led to his killing. People seem.to forget that Obama wanted to repeal those policies.
-
Ridiculous, it was the bush policies + the seals that led to his killing. People seem.to forget that Obama wanted to repeal those policies.
hahahahahhaha bish tried for seven years and failed just like your last post
-
hahahahahhaha bish tried for seven years and failed just like your last post
Who is "bish"?
-
Except not on lybia, egypt, solyndra, the billions in fraud in the stim bill, the more deathas in 3 years in afghanistan than 8 under W, etc etc right?
Months have passed and you STILL cannot spell L-I-B-Y-A correctly. ::)
dunce
-
Who is "bish"?
The man from "Lybia", lol ;)