Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:58:08 AM



Title: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:58:08 AM
put him beside nasser :o ;D

seriously nasser in 96 carried huge amounts of hard muscles,.. may be the biggest in the history of the sport, even bigger than markus in 2002 and of course much better in shape.. also bigger than ronnie in 2003 who was at nearly 300 pounds not as dry and hard as nasser in 96..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:59:51 AM
flat from the side hahahhahhahhaaaa...


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 02:04:12 AM
from the front it was not even close between him and the others..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 02:05:18 AM
 8)


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 02:06:55 AM
and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: cephissus on November 14, 2012, 02:12:28 AM
uncrowned mr. o, no doubt


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 02:35:49 AM
uncrowned mr. o, no doubt

X2222222222222



Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Bam-bam on November 14, 2012, 03:40:02 AM
nasser 96 was peak nasser for sure


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Parker on November 14, 2012, 04:37:37 AM
Thing is Nasser and Dillet weighed roughly the same. And Dillet had a better shape-more aesthetically balanced. Nasser just looked like a big mound of muscle.
Also, compared to a 96 Ronnie yes he was bigger---but with the back shots, you can see that Nasser's detail stopped at mid back---and wasn't as deep as Dorian's or Ronnie's.

Also, that video has a different contrast than real life. Due to this, it makes any detail stand out and look more impressive than it is. When the reality is, the detail is not as impressive. It's an illusion.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 04:55:19 AM
Thing is Nasser and Dillet weighed roughly the same. And Dillet had a better shape-more aesthetically balanced. Nasser just looked like a big mound of muscle.
Also, compared to a 96 Ronnie yes he was bigger---but with the back shots, you can see that Nasser's detail stopped at mid back---and wasn't as deep as Dorian's or Ronnie's.

Also, that video has a different contrast than real life. Due to this, it makes any detail stand out and look more impressive than it is. When the reality is, the detail is not as impressive. It's an illusion.

lol at saying dillet had a better shape than nasser..

and i didn't say his back was better here than dorian or ronnie,.. i said he held his own against the 2 best backs ever..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: steamboatwillie on November 14, 2012, 05:11:19 AM
Anyone in those pics would run away with the Olympia crown right now...not hating on Phil or Kai, but those guys looked a million times better back then.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Frank Clairmonte on November 14, 2012, 05:49:23 AM
Nasser el Sonbaty at his BEST - German GP 1996.

Amazing bodybuilder.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: gracie bjj on November 14, 2012, 05:49:55 AM
 i saw nasser back in 96 guest posing in jersey n he was prolly the most massive bodybuilder i ever seen. he was offseason weighing about 320 or so


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Mr Anabolic on November 14, 2012, 05:52:14 AM
To the OP:  Does Nasser shave his balls, or do you prefer to suck on them when hairy?




Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Parker on November 14, 2012, 06:29:50 AM
lol at saying dillet had a better shape than nasser..

and i didn't say his back was better here than dorian or ronnie,.. i said he held his own against the 2 best backs ever..
Everybody knows that Dillet had a better shape than Nasser. Small waist, rounder, fuller muscles.
Nasser was just a big dude, even Milos commented on him, saying that bodybuilding was about the biggest, just weigh the person and the biggest slab of meat would win. But, it ain't all about that.

Nasser was good, but his best wasn't enough to win at Dorian's or Ronnie's best...not even Flex's best.
And that is telling.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 06:40:39 AM
why not post the video, instead of carefully selected pics, and let us see for ourselves.  ;)


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Figo on November 14, 2012, 08:40:36 AM
Nasser does look huge, freaky huge

Dillet looks better except from the back

Nassers back looks better there, but not close to Yates or prime Ronnie



Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: mass243 on November 14, 2012, 08:44:46 AM


Now that's big.

Monstah.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 08:45:38 AM
Everybody knows that Dillet had a better shape than Nasser. Small waist, rounder, fuller muscles.
Nasser was just a big dude, even Milos commented on him, saying that bodybuilding was about the biggest, just weigh the person and the biggest slab of meat would win. But, it ain't all about that.

Nasser was good, but his best wasn't enough to win at Dorian's or Ronnie's best...not even Flex's best.
And that is telling.

as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 08:48:05 AM
why not post the video, instead of carefully selected pics, and let us see for ourselves.  ;)

i really didnt do any selection and you can post any pic. you want from the GP 96.. nasser was really phenomenal.. as for the videos share whatever you want.. i will try to find that one of him with ronnie and levrone..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 08:54:24 AM
here is the video gronk..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uK4RZLk_qA


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:12:39 AM
paul dillet is with no doubt at all the guy who put on the most muscle at this leanness level on a human frame ever.

dillet is a tiny tiny boned man,tiny waist nasser is blocky.

dillet is a true monstrosity

had some "flaws", but definitely deserved mr olympia title more than some yates with teared of arm muscles.

to be fair the biggest i saw dillett was in 1994 and he was in a good condition.. in 96 he presented one of his best shapes but i think was a little smaller than in 94.. but nasser in 96 was CLEARLY bigger and thicker than paul from all angles and in all parts.. as for muscles shape and proportions between different parts i really see no comparison.. dillet had monstrous shoulders and arms and very good legs and calves but his torso was not the same level as his limbs.. it was not thick or wide enough to go with them..  


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:20:13 AM
gronk has vanished after the video lol..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:25:26 AM
and here we are talking about one of dillett's best but when he was not at his best like at the AC 97 he looked very flat and small beside nasser although nasser here was not as big as in 96..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 09:27:57 AM
gronk has vanished after the video lol..

The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:33:08 AM
The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.

against yates or who??.. ::)

also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:40:31 AM
same tour the english round..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duJqGYf77pc


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 09:41:21 AM
against yates or who??.. ::)

also didnt you see before levrone a better bb than nasser??..


Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:47:05 AM

Overall, no doubt. One contest doesn't make a career.

Nasser looked great there, best he's ever looked. That is a weird video though, and that's probably the only contest I've ever seen where the lighting makes the white guys look better than the black guys

so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird ::).. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: ARNIE1947 on November 14, 2012, 09:49:04 AM
 :)


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 09:50:33 AM
so firstly i was posting selected pics and no videos and now the videos are weird ::).. what is your next excuse gronk??..

no one contest can make a great career but anyway this has nothing to do with nasser who was always on at his best for more than 5 years..

I just said he looks great, his best ever.

But that is a weird video, the contrast and aspect is all jacked up.

relax tiny


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: El Diablo Blanco on November 14, 2012, 10:18:16 AM
and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

No he doesn't


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 10:23:44 AM
No he doesn't5

Sherief has been pushing that bullshit for 5 years, trying to get some traction.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Parker on November 14, 2012, 10:37:18 AM
as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 10:43:38 AM
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

I think Nasser beats him, best to best.

Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.

But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.

and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: disco_stu on November 14, 2012, 11:30:38 AM
just like branch is massive...nasser was too.

both a steaming pile of turd.

lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.

there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.

the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...



Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Jaime on November 14, 2012, 11:38:55 AM
Did someone use a microwave to take these pictures? Great picture quality.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: cephissus on November 14, 2012, 11:45:27 AM
just like branch is massive...nasser was too.

both a steaming pile of turd.

lumps of muscle stacked on top of itself.

there were and have been, since, better BODYBUILDERS.

the key to both not winning is a massive midsection...



does anyone care what this guy says ???


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Shockwave on November 14, 2012, 11:49:14 AM
I think Nasser beats him, best to best.

Dillet was a freak of nature, probably the most impressive specimen ever, just looking at him standing there.

But he never came in in the type of conditon needed to win shows, Nasser was always in shape.

and his flaws were atrocious...he looked like a fucking retard onstage and his back was worse than nassers
I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 11:51:43 AM
I'd say Nasser USUALLY came in shape. Later in his career it was a crapshoot.

I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination  ;D


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Shockwave on November 14, 2012, 11:53:24 AM
I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination  ;D
Ah, roger that.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 12:40:21 PM
what i mean is this.

if they both died and some butcher would peel their muscles off the bones, muscle for muscle, thered be more meat in size and weight from dillets corpse.

nasser would be all stomach weight.

nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..

as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better ;D


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Jaime on November 14, 2012, 12:42:08 PM
nasser was bigger in all parts even arms and shoulders which were paul's best and biggest parts.. check the pic. well..

as for the butcher thing i think nasser would taste better ;D


No he wasn't, that's one pic, Dillet had bigger arms and shoulders than Nasser, Nasser had to abuse SEO to get his arms over 19 inches.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 12:43:54 PM
Because Paul couldn't pose worth shit and had a shitty back.

Paul had a better structure, and shape...Hell, he had a better shape than Dorian, but Dorian blew him away in terms of back detail, conditioning, etc.

Shape and structure are only part of the equation, only Flex or Cormier could really get away with being a tad soft...and really, it was Flex out of the two  whose shape carried him to more wins.

Dillet at his best vs Nasser at his best would be a good comparison. It could go either way.

no because it was always going to nasser's way 8).. in 96 both were at their best or very close and nasser beat him 7 times, 6 if you dont want to count the olympia..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: cephissus on November 14, 2012, 12:47:45 PM
why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 12:50:03 PM
and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

No he's not lol


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 12:52:36 PM
why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?

because he failed a diuretic test.. the same test jay cutler failed in 2001 but was not dq'd :-\

this is why team nasser doesnt accept this disqualification 8) ;D


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 12:54:31 PM
No he's not lol

in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: the_swami on November 14, 2012, 12:54:48 PM
Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 12:57:23 PM
Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back

Nasser admitted he had a weak back , it's blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't purchase his underwear. His back sucked

Great bodybuilder from the front though


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: TrueGrit on November 14, 2012, 12:57:38 PM
Cartoon character. That's a true freak.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=108131.0;attach=129286;image)


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 12:58:50 PM
because he failed a diuretic test.. the same test jay cutler failed in 2001 but was not dq'd :-\

this is why team nasser doesnt accept this disqualification 8) ;D

The difference being Jay fought it and had an angle to work with , Nasser didn't.

Even if you don't accept it he was still behind Yates and Ray  8)


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:00:21 PM
in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..

Ronnie even in 96 was awesome , he didn't beat Ronnie in any back pose nevermind held his own with Dorian

You can make a case from the front in certain poses , but ain't happening from the back


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 01:01:10 PM
Nasser admitted he had a weak back , it's blatantly obvious to anyone who doesn't purchase his underwear. His back sucked

Great bodybuilder from the front though




LOL, so true ....but here we go again with team Nasser trying to get one fucking person to agree that Nasser's back "wasn't that bad"  ;D


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: the_swami on November 14, 2012, 01:01:28 PM
why did nasser get dq'd anyway?

so yates could win again?

There was no actual diuretics testing in the 96 O

Matarazzo snitched to De milia that Nasser had used some diuretic. De milia wanted to make an example out of someone after the death of Munzer to show the public the IFBB was "testing". Unfortunately because of Snitch Matarazzo .Nasser was the victim.
repeat, there was NO testing for any drugs @ teh 96 O

Levrone alludes to the whole situation in Nasser on the Way Part 7- he states "Nasser,you still have the 3rd place trophy! i would have done excatly the same thing as you if they had done that to me, i would have kept the trophy!"


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Jaime on November 14, 2012, 01:01:38 PM
Nasser did not have a great v taper. His back was terrible and 3 inches of his upper arm size was oil.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: the_swami on November 14, 2012, 01:02:52 PM
Nasser 95-98 was an amazing BB, one of the greatest ever

never has there been such a combination of massive size, tiny waist, ripped conditioning and hardness, shape and symmetry.

Nasser was not blocky, he had an incredible V taper and aesthetic shape.

Nasser's back in those years was as thick and wide as Yates but just not as dry hence looked slightly less detailed.

It is erroneous to say nasser had a weak back, Paul Dillet had a weak back

x2!


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:03:06 PM
There was no actual diuretics testing in the 96 O

Matarazzo snitched to De milia that Nasser had used some diuretic. De milia wanted to make an example out of someone after the death of Munzer to show the public the IFBB was "testing". Unfortunately because of Snitch Matarazzo .Nasser was the victim.
repeat, there was NO testing for any drugs @ teh 96 O

Levrone alludes to the whole situation in Nasser on the Way Part 7- he states "Nasser,you still have the 3rd place trophy! i would have done excatly the same thing as you if they had done waht they did that to me, i would have kept the trophy!"

Prove there was no test , don't type there was no test.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Shockwave on November 14, 2012, 01:04:34 PM



LOL, so true ....but here we go again with team Nasser trying to get one fucking person to agree that Nasser's back "wasn't that bad"  ;D
Absurd as defending Ronnies calves or Dorians torn up arm.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Jaime on November 14, 2012, 01:07:03 PM
Absurd as defending Ronnies calves or Dorians torn up arm.

Or Kevin's ever changing luggage size.

Or Jay's jaw.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:15:45 PM
Absurd as defending Ronnies calves or Dorians torn up arm.

Well in both cases these flaws were less of a liability than having one of the biggest and complex muscle groups being missing in action

They say ' Hey his back is wide it's just not as detailed ' when in reality it's lacking some much more

Nasser was an outstanding bodybuilder from the front , he will get credit for that. Guy was a monster and competing near 300 in contest condition before anyone


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:17:11 PM
Ronnie even in 96 was awesome , he didn't beat Ronnie in any back pose nevermind held his own with Dorian

You can make a case from the front in certain poses , but ain't happening from the back

yes ronnie was very good in 96 but his back at this point was still not one of the best ever.. not only nasser but also kevin was better than ronnie in the RLS.. check the comparison again..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: arce1988 on November 14, 2012, 01:17:48 PM
  nasser was good... but not Mr. O


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:18:07 PM
put him beside nasser :o ;D

seriously nasser in 96 carried huge amounts of hard muscles,.. may be the biggest in the history of the sport, even bigger than markus in 2002 and of course much better in shape.. also bigger than ronnie in 2003 who was at nearly 300 pounds not as dry and hard as nasser in 96..

You're missing the whole point as well , Nasser made Yates and Ray look small but still consistently lost to them. congrats he was bigger lol here's a bronze medal for your effort



Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:19:49 PM
Well in both cases these flaws were less of a liability than having one of the biggest and complex muscle groups being missing in action

They say ' Hey his back is wide it's just not as detailed ' when in reality it's lacking some much more

Nasser was an outstanding bodybuilder from the front , he will get credit for that. Guy was a monster and competing near 300 in contest condition before anyone

but this contradicts your previous claim that his built was not made to compete at over 260 pounds hahaha..

typical ND,.. changing his opinions according to each thread..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:20:06 PM
yes ronnie was very good in 96 but his back at this point was still not one of the best ever.. not only nasser but also kevin was better than ronnie in the RLS.. check the comparison again..

Ronnie's back 1996 infinitely better than Nasser , Nasser does NOT hold his own with this he just doesn't


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: the_swami on November 14, 2012, 01:23:15 PM
prove that anything written in Flex mag, which you accept as gospel truth, is true.

when you have met with BB's and people on the inside, in the industry, you know the truth

when you havent ,you are jsut another one of the ignorant blind sheep


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:25:01 PM
but this contradicts your previous claim that his built was not made to compete at over 260 pounds hahaha..

typical ND,.. changing his opinions according to each thread..

Typical Sherief can NOT remember what I typed. I NEVER claimed he was not made to compete over 260 , just like I NEVER typed he didn't have the structure to be a mass monster. You can't back up these erroneous claims when I pushed you on proving I said them , nothings changed.

I've ALWAYS maintained Nasser carried his size very well , one of the few who could. I said PLAYING mass monster never worked out for him ultimately because his back suffered for it. He thought all I have to do is be bigger than Dorian and I would beat him , which shows where his mentality was and it's exactly why he lost to Yates and to a 205lb Shawn Ray



Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:26:59 PM
prove that anything written in Flex mag, which you accept as gospel truth, is true.

when you have met with BB's and people on the inside, in the industry, you know the truth

when you havent ,you are jsut another one of the ignorant blind sheep

Again , prove there was no test , don't type there was no test.

And my ' Cousins , Uncle's , sister's , aunt , told a dear friend of mine ' is NOT proof.

You have your excuses for Nasser's failures , keep clinging to them it's all you have.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Jadeveon Clowney on November 14, 2012, 01:29:06 PM
in the RLS he did.. actually imo he beat ronnie in this pose in 96.. check the comparison video again..

why so agitated, tiny?


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:33:55 PM
Ronnie's back 1996 infinitely better than Nasser , Nasser does NOT hold his own with this he just doesn't

sure ronnie's RDB was great but his RLS was not the same level at all.. nasser and levrone both beat him in this pose in this year..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on November 14, 2012, 01:35:15 PM
sure ronnie's RDB was great but his RLS was not the same level at all.. nasser and levrone both beat him in this pose in this year..

We'll agree to disagree



Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:37:42 PM
We'll agree to disagree



plz take the RLS comparison shots from that video and post here.. if this is possible for you..


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 01:39:37 PM
why so agitated, tiny?

go and wash  your ass well then be ready to take this :-X


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Jadeveon Clowney on November 14, 2012, 02:21:41 PM
go and wash  your ass well then be ready to take this :-X

are you going to destroy the sphinx like your mullah asked you to, tiny?


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Parker on November 14, 2012, 02:28:32 PM
go and wash  your ass well then be ready to take this :-X
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uldt6Y-CE3s


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: mdn250 on November 14, 2012, 03:15:41 PM
I'm talking about his prime years. Nasser from 98 on completely fell apart, palumboism and synthol are a bad combination  ;D

Agree on that. I believe he might have been the first pro to showcase 4 deltoids. I know Kevin English pulled that off a few times before his popular 202lbs showings. I guess they confused side delts with biceps.

MDN


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Nirvana on November 14, 2012, 03:27:53 PM
There was no actual diuretics testing in the 96 O

Matarazzo snitched to De milia that Nasser had used some diuretic. De milia wanted to make an example out of someone after the death of Munzer to show the public the IFBB was "testing". Unfortunately because of Snitch Matarazzo .Nasser was the victim.
repeat, there was NO testing for any drugs @ teh 96 O

Levrone alludes to the whole situation in Nasser on the Way Part 7- he states "Nasser,you still have the 3rd place trophy! i would have done excatly the same thing as you if they had done that to me, i would have kept the trophy!"
are you implying that everyone onstage was using diuretics?  :o   wow i thought nasser was the only one.  ::)


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Kwon_2 on November 14, 2012, 04:00:56 PM
Sure Sheriff Salami, but you will never look like your idol Nascar El Somebody.

He is/was massive, you're not.


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 14, 2012, 04:10:59 PM
Sure Sheriff Salami, but you will never look like your idol Nascar El Somebody.

He is/was massive, you're not.

"Nascar El Somebody"..LOL

that and "Time Westcock" are the best getbig names ever


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 07:50:13 PM
Sure Sheriff Salami, but you will never look like your idol Nascar El Somebody.

He is/was massive, you're not.

nasser is not my idol and i dont want to look like him or like any pro...


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: BayGBM on November 14, 2012, 07:55:03 PM
uncrowned mr. o, no doubt

Tier 1 for sure!  :P


Title: Re: How to see Paul Dillett small??..
Post by: Kwon_2 on November 14, 2012, 09:30:41 PM
"Nascar El Somebody"..LOL

that and "Time Westcock" are the best getbig names ever

 ;D