Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Roger Bacon on June 13, 2013, 11:06:39 AM
-
CALIFORNIA VOTES To Allow BOYS TO SHOWER WITH GIRLS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
http://ctnbreakingnews.blogspot.com/2013/06/california-votes-to-allow-boys-to.html
AB 1266 states that public schools cannot discriminate in any way concerning the sex of the student. Both sexes are to have equal access to all offered courses, counseling and athletics. Any student can try out for any sport, regardless of their sex.
But the kicker is this statement contained in the bill:
“SECTION 1. Section 221.5 of the Education Code is amended to read:”
“(f) A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and facilities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”
In other words, any boy who claims he is a girl, even though he is anatomically still a boy, would be allowed to use the same locker rooms and showers that the girls use. On the opposite side, a girl claiming to be a boy but is still anatomically a girl would be allowed to shower with all the boys. They don’t even have to be undergoing any form of sex change therapy, just say they are the opposite sex from what they really are and they can parade around in all their glory in either locker room or shower.
;D ;D ;D
-
i call dibs on the porn site that will video these!
-
DID I NOT MOTHER FUCKING CALL THIS?????
-
CALIFORNIA VOTES To Allow BOYS TO SHOWER WITH GIRLS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
http://ctnbreakingnews.blogspot.com/2013/06/california-votes-to-allow-boys-to.html
AB 1266 states that public schools cannot discriminate in any way concerning the sex of the student. Both sexes are to have equal access to all offered courses, counseling and athletics. Any student can try out for any sport, regardless of their sex.
But the kicker is this statement contained in the bill:
“SECTION 1. Section 221.5 of the Education Code is amended to read:”
“(f) A pupil shall be permitted to participate in sex-segregated school programs and facilities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”
In other words, any boy who claims he is a girl, even though he is anatomically still a boy, would be allowed to use the same locker rooms and showers that the girls use. On the opposite side, a girl claiming to be a boy but is still anatomically a girl would be allowed to shower with all the boys. They don’t even have to be undergoing any form of sex change therapy, just say they are the opposite sex from what they really are and they can parade around in all their glory in either locker room or shower.
;D ;D ;D
I think it's a little more complicated than what you make it out to be. Still, I'm not sure what to think of this to be honest. Even if it was good idea for the transgender kid, what about the non-transgender kids?
I guess it's an "issue" that must be solved in some way, but I don't know that there's really a best way.
California is just weird...
-
DID I NOT MOTHER FUCKING CALL THIS?????
You did
-
I wish my gym would vote in a similar manner.
-
I think it's a little more complicated than what you make it out to be. Still, I'm not sure what to think of this to be honest. Even if it was good idea for the transgender kid, what about the non-transgender kids?
I guess it's an "issue" that must be solved in some way, but I don't know that there's really a best way.
California is just weird...
They did a story on this a few weeks ago on the radio. Apparently one of the things that the California assembly took into account was that this policy had already been in place in several California school districts for the past 10 years and it didn't result in any confusion. I didn't really find that surprising.
-
They did a story on this a few weeks ago on the radio. Apparently one of the things that the California assembly took into account was that this policy had already been in place in several California school districts for the past 10 years and it didn't result in any confusion. I didn't really find that surprising.
Hard hitting analysis as usual. ::)
-
Hard hitting analysis as usual. ::)
My analysis IS usually hard-hitting and insightful. But this wasn't meant to be analysis. This was just additional info that put this nontroversy into perspective.
-
My analysis IS usually hard-hitting and insightful. But this wasn't meant to be analysis. This was just additional info that put this nontroversy into perspective.
Thank you for the clarification. Now, the healing process can begin for the getbig.com community.
-
Thank you for the clarification. Now, the healing process can begin for the getbig.com community.
hahaha!!! ;D
Over his head
-
hahaha!!! ;D
Over his head
::) No, not at all.
-
DID I NOT MOTHER FUCKING CALL THIS?????
You didn't call it, ...you just prayed your little heart out for it. lol
...and as soon as you realize you're both out of school, and NOT in California,
...you're gonna cry your little eyes out! ;D. ( ps: I almost feel sorry for you it didn't happen in time.) ;)
-
If you cut off your dick or get one put on you are still what your dna says you are and thats where you should shower.
-
America forgets that its people aren't as "progressive" as the law makers are. You get a girl going in the boys room, or vis-versa, all you'll get is rape, brutal bully beatings, and ridicule.
Maybe this would work in one of Europe's ultra nanny feminist countries, for sure not in Murica.
-
You didn't call it, ...you just prayed your little heart out for it. lol
...and as soon as you realize you're both out of school, and NOT in California,
...you're gonna cry your little eyes out! ;D. ( ps: I almost feel sorry for you it didn't happen in time.) ;)
thanks for the sympathy and the acknowledgment that I did indeed call this.