Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on May 23, 2014, 11:43:58 AM
-
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/23/obama-blames-structural-design-congress-gridlock
LOL
-
This clown has to be the biggest fucktard the world has seen. His ability to get things done is 1. His plans never work and 2. He doesn't work. He's like most of his constituents....lazy. Just imagine if this clown actually knew what he was doing.
-
This clown has to be the biggest fucktard the world has seen. His ability to get things done is 1. His plans never work and 2. He doesn't work. He's like most of his constituents....lazy. Just imagine if this clown actually knew what he was doing.
The constitution was made for exactly people like o-fag being elected to public office.
-
Good thing he's a constitutional scholar ::)
-
That darned pesky Constitution ruined everything! :'(
-
TIL, ya know. Turns out that Obama makes a good point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_United_States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_United_States)
...
The most contentious disputes revolved around the composition and election of the Senate, how "proportional representation" was to be defined (whether to include slaves or other property), ...
Much more at the link in case anyone here really wants to know what they're talking about...
-
Obama has the least amount...as in zero...executive experience of any President this century ( if not ever). His inability to work within a structured enviroment and manage conflicts towards compromise is hardly surprising.
-
The USC was drafted and aopted because of shit heads like obama being elected by the idiots of society.
TIL, ya know. Turns out that Obama makes a good point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_United_States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_United_States)
...
The most contentious disputes revolved around the composition and election of the Senate, how "proportional representation" was to be defined (whether to include slaves or other property), ...
Much more at the link in case anyone here really wants to know what they're talking about...
-
The USC was drafted and aopted because of shit heads like obama being elected by the idiots of society.
this statement makes no sense, just like virtually all of your posts
also, you didn't vote for Obama so how can the idiots of society be blamed for him being elected
-
this statement makes no sense, just like virtually all of your posts
also, you didn't vote for Obama so how can the idiots of society be blamed for him being elected
There is a thing called checks and balances for a veru good reason. Psychotic freaks like are obama are imtemtionally limited so that they cant do too much damage.
-
TIL, ya know. Turns out that Obama makes a good point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_United_States (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention_United_States)
...
The most contentious disputes revolved around the composition and election of the Senate, how "proportional representation" was to be defined (whether to include slaves or other property), ...
Much more at the link in case anyone here really wants to know what they're talking about...
They dont. They posters above are sad stupid fools with a combined intellect that doesnt match the earlier primates.
Of course they all vote republican.
-
They dont. They posters above are sad stupid fools with a combined intellect that doesnt match the earlier primates.
Of course they all vote republican.
Poor ofag. Cant be a kenyan king as he wanted
-
Bwahaha. Guess I'm late to the party but I finally realize why the right is having this particular hissy fit. Seem Obama had some pointed things to say about Republicans and their contribution to congressional gridlock:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/23/morning-plum-obama-slams-both-sides-to-blame-media/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/23/morning-plum-obama-slams-both-sides-to-blame-media/)
...
“You’ll hear if you watch the nightly news or you read the newspapers that, well, there’s gridlock, Congress is broken, approval ratings for Congress are terrible. And there’s a tendency to say, a plague on both your houses. But the truth of the matter is that the problem in Congress is very specific. We have a group of folks in the Republican Party who have taken over who are so ideologically rigid, who are so committed to an economic theory that says if folks at the top do very well then everybody else is somehow going to do well; who deny the science of climate change; who don’t think making investments in early childhood education makes sense; who have repeatedly blocked raising a minimum wage so if you work full-time in this country you’re not living in poverty; who scoff at the notion that we might have a problem with women not getting paid for doing the same work that men are doing.
“They, so far, at least, have refused to budge on bipartisan legislation to fix our immigration system, despite the fact that every economist who’s looked at it says it’s going to improve our economy, cut our deficits, help spawn entrepreneurship, and alleviate great pain from millions of families all across the country.
“So the problem…is not that the Democrats are overly ideological — because the truth of the matter is, is that the Democrats in Congress have consistently been willing to compromise and reach out to the other side. There are no radical proposals coming out from the left. When we talk about climate change, we talk about how do we incentivize through the market greater investment in clean energy. When we talk about immigration reform there’s no wild-eyed romanticism. We say we’re going to be tough on the borders, but let’s also make sure that the system works to allow families to stay together…
“When we talk about taxes we don’t say we’re going to have rates in the 70 percent or 90 percent when it comes to income like existed here 50, 60 years ago. We say let’s just make sure that those of us who have been incredibly blessed by this country are giving back to kids so that they’re getting a good start in life, so that they get early childhood education…Health care — we didn’t suddenly impose some wild, crazy system. All we said was let’s make sure everybody has insurance. And this made the other side go nuts — the simple idea that in the wealthiest nation on Earth, nobody should go bankrupt because somebody in their family gets sick, working within a private system.
“So when you hear a false equivalence that somehow, well, Congress is just broken, it’s not true. What’s broken right now is a Republican Party that repeatedly says no to proven, time-tested strategies to grow the economy, create more jobs, ensure fairness, open up opportunity to all people.”
...
Too true to be funny but I'm laughing anyway.
-
and I really thought Bush was the worst it could get... how foolish of me :-X :-X
-
Yeah , obama has nothing to do w anything. ::)
Bwahaha. Guess I'm late to the party but I finally realize why the right is having this particular hissy fit. Seem Obama had some pointed things to say about Republicans and their contribution to congressional gridlock:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/23/morning-plum-obama-slams-both-sides-to-blame-media/ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/05/23/morning-plum-obama-slams-both-sides-to-blame-media/)
...
“You’ll hear if you watch the nightly news or you read the newspapers that, well, there’s gridlock, Congress is broken, approval ratings for Congress are terrible. And there’s a tendency to say, a plague on both your houses. But the truth of the matter is that the problem in Congress is very specific. We have a group of folks in the Republican Party who have taken over who are so ideologically rigid, who are so committed to an economic theory that says if folks at the top do very well then everybody else is somehow going to do well; who deny the science of climate change; who don’t think making investments in early childhood education makes sense; who have repeatedly blocked raising a minimum wage so if you work full-time in this country you’re not living in poverty; who scoff at the notion that we might have a problem with women not getting paid for doing the same work that men are doing.
“They, so far, at least, have refused to budge on bipartisan legislation to fix our immigration system, despite the fact that every economist who’s looked at it says it’s going to improve our economy, cut our deficits, help spawn entrepreneurship, and alleviate great pain from millions of families all across the country.
“So the problem…is not that the Democrats are overly ideological — because the truth of the matter is, is that the Democrats in Congress have consistently been willing to compromise and reach out to the other side. There are no radical proposals coming out from the left. When we talk about climate change, we talk about how do we incentivize through the market greater investment in clean energy. When we talk about immigration reform there’s no wild-eyed romanticism. We say we’re going to be tough on the borders, but let’s also make sure that the system works to allow families to stay together…
“When we talk about taxes we don’t say we’re going to have rates in the 70 percent or 90 percent when it comes to income like existed here 50, 60 years ago. We say let’s just make sure that those of us who have been incredibly blessed by this country are giving back to kids so that they’re getting a good start in life, so that they get early childhood education…Health care — we didn’t suddenly impose some wild, crazy system. All we said was let’s make sure everybody has insurance. And this made the other side go nuts — the simple idea that in the wealthiest nation on Earth, nobody should go bankrupt because somebody in their family gets sick, working within a private system.
“So when you hear a false equivalence that somehow, well, Congress is just broken, it’s not true. What’s broken right now is a Republican Party that repeatedly says no to proven, time-tested strategies to grow the economy, create more jobs, ensure fairness, open up opportunity to all people.”
...
Too true to be funny but I'm laughing anyway.
-
Out of 42 presidents, only 20 had more experience as an elected public official than Obama does now. Only 20 presidents had more experience than Obama as an elected official in Washington, D.C. In terms of his experience, Obama would be a typical president.
These are facts... Not really kneepadding if the info is actually true. Obama's a shitty prez, but his years of experience is right down the middle of where presidents have when they enter office.
-
Out of 42 presidents, only 20 had more experience as an elected public official than Obama does now. Only 20 presidents had more experience than Obama as an elected official in Washington, D.C. In terms of his experience, Obama would be a typical president.
These are facts... Not really kneepadding if the info is actually true. Obama's a shitty prez, but his years of experience is right down the middle of where presidents have when they enter office.
LOL - funny - this pos was claiming he was the 4th best prez in his first term - no resigned to complasining and blaming for his failed presidency
-
LOL - funny - this pos was claiming he was the 4th best prez in his first term - no resigned to complasining and blaming for his failed presidency
LMAO... Dude! I think you missed the [sarcasm] in the original joke I posted, 333386.
YOU CAN NOT ARGUE WITH THE RESEARCH NUMBERS
Obama Rated As The 4th Best President Ever
...Hard to dispute unbiased research A study group recently released its findings as to the best presidents of the United States of America. Obama has been rated as the 4th best president ever of 44 presidents:
Reagan was first, 24 presidents tied for second, 18 tied for third, and Obama came in fourth.
-
;D
LMAO... Dude! I think you missed the [sarcasm] in the original joke I posted, 333386.
YOU CAN NOT ARGUE WITH THE RESEARCH NUMBERS
Obama Rated As The 4th Best President Ever
...Hard to dispute unbiased research A study group recently released its findings as to the best presidents of the United States of America. Obama has been rated as the 4th best president ever of 44 presidents:
Reagan was first, 24 presidents tied for second, 18 tied for third, and Obama came in fourth.
-
They dont. They posters above are sad stupid fools with a combined intellect that doesnt match the earlier primates.
Of course they all vote republican.
Haha! Ok "whork". Oh Brother. ::)
-
LMAO... Dude! I think you missed the [sarcasm] in the original joke I posted, 333386.
YOU CAN NOT ARGUE WITH THE RESEARCH NUMBERS
Obama Rated As The 4th Best President Ever
...Hard to dispute unbiased research A study group recently released its findings as to the best presidents of the United States of America. Obama has been rated as the 4th best president ever of 44 presidents:
Reagan was first, 24 presidents tied for second, 18 tied for third, and Obama came in fourth.
What unbiased research study group, you didn't link one. He's by far the worst (whatever the fuck he does) of our time. The local Cal Trans worker has more experience and of course, commonsense than this clown.
-
Haha! Ok "whork". Oh Brother. ::)
Prove him wrong, then.
Give us a civics lesson, money-man.
-
...
He's by far the worst (whatever the fuck he does) of our time.
...
This could be true but I'm wondering how YOU would know this, Coach. Did you major in history or political science, maybe?
-
Prove him wrong, then.
Give us a civics lesson, money-man.
THE USC is specifically intended to foil and check radical communist zealots like Obama. O-homo and his communist cultists would like for us to believe that only but for a few more ACA, Stim Bill, etc we would be in bliss. Fuck that, we have checks and balances for a reason.
If that ghetto smelly twink does not like it - well fuck him - let him go to Kenya where he belongs where he can be King of Zamunda and rule over those people.
-
Prove him wrong, then.
Give us a civics lesson, money-man.
I don't waste time trying to "prove wrong" someone who calls all who vote Republican "idiots". How many times has your hero's admin wiped its ass with our Constitution? You're wrong if you say "none".
-
I don't waste time trying to "prove wrong" someone who calls all who vote Republican "idiots". How many times has your hero's admin wiped its ass with our Constitution? You're wrong if you say "none".
"My hero?" Shaddup with that clueless shit, kid. Your lack of reading comprehension seems to be an issue.
FWIW, I do have a problem with much of the government's rights abuses under Obama. Probably slightly different complaints than yours, but righties are seriously out to lunch with all that "most liberal pres ever" BS. In many ways, Obama is a right-tard.
-
What unbiased research study group, you didn't link one. He's by far the worst (whatever the fuck he does) of our time. The local Cal Trans worker has more experience and of course, commonsense than this clown.
??? LOL please, read it again. The poll has him dead last... they have a bunch tied at 2nd, and a bunch tied at 3rd lol.
Reagan was first, 24 presidents tied for second, 18 tied for third, and Obama came in fourth.
-
The Constitution was designed and put into place for exactly that purpose-to restrain radicals like obama.
-
??? LOL please, read it again. The poll has him dead last... they have a bunch tied at 2nd, and a bunch tied at 3rd lol.
Reagan was first, 24 presidents tied for second, 18 tied for third, and Obama came in fourth.
Nevermind...I forgot I posted this a couple of months ago on the G&O...lol.
-
"My hero?" Shaddup with that clueless shit, kid. Your lack of reading comprehension seems to be an issue.
FWIW, I do have a problem with much of the government's rights abuses under Obama. Probably slightly different complaints than yours, but righties are seriously out to lunch with all that "most liberal pres ever" BS. In many ways, Obama is a right-tard.
OK "pops". I actually have other things in my life besides "getbig", so excuse me for not being on here posting endless links and arguing with you guys several hours a day. It's not that serious, and it won't change a thing for me to spend 12 hours a day online arguing with liberal college kids - even IF I had the time.
I put more time and effort into contacting my elected officials, writing letters to reputable publications and other media, contributing to political campaigns, etc.
You actually think he's not enough of a radical leftist?
-
OK "pops". I actually have other things in my life besides "getbig", so excuse me for not being on here posting endless links and arguing with you guys several hours a day. It's not that serious, and it won't change a thing for me to spend 12 hours a day online arguing with liberal college kids - even IF I had the time.
I put more time and effort into contacting my elected officials, writing letters to reputable publications and other media, contributing to political campaigns, etc.
You actually think he's not enough of a radical leftist?
Fine, you get a pass to just say whatever comes to mind, then. lol
BTW, 12 hours to find links to sources that believe that the Chinese wouldn't respect taking measures to address man-made climate change? Seems like an exaggeration to me but whateva.
And what's this arguing with liberal college kids shit? Where do you get such pre-conceived notions? I'm 50 years old and finished school a long time ago.
I'll answer your last question with my own question: Do you know of a lot of radical leftists who favor international killing via unmanned drones? Wait, don't bother answering -- you're too busy contacting elected officials, lol.
-
I don't waste time trying to "prove wrong" someone who calls all who vote Republican "idiots". How many times has your hero's admin wiped its ass with our Constitution? You're wrong if you say "none".
So you have time to comment but not time to prove anything?
Like i said you are an idiot.
-
So you have time to comment but not time to prove anything?
Like i said you are an idiot.
What was it I was supposed to prove?
The other clown asked for a link from a site that was not "right wing leaning".
I guess he'd be fine with a link from one that is "left wing leaning"?
Why would I bother with some libtard fratboy such as yourself who starts threads like "all Republican voters are idiots!"?...
Are you bored now that the semester is over?
Wanna compare personal financial statements?
Someday you may have to move out of Mom's basement and get a job, and you'll learn that such REAL idiocy won't get you very far.
-
I really feel bad for you if you're 50. :'(
Fine, you get a pass to just say whatever comes to mind, then. lol
BTW, 12 hours to find links to sources that believe that the Chinese wouldn't respect taking measures to address man-made climate change? Seems like an exaggeration to me but whateva.
And what's this arguing with liberal college kids shit? Where do you get such pre-conceived notions? I'm 50 years old and finished school a long time ago.
I'll answer your last question with my own question: Do you know of a lot of radical leftists who favor international killing via unmanned drones? Wait, don't bother answering -- you're too busy contacting elected officials, lol.
-
What was it I was supposed to prove?
The other clown asked for a link from a site that was not "right wing leaning".
I guess he'd be fine with a link from one that is "left wing leaning"?
Why would I bother with some libtard fratboy such as yourself who starts threads like "all Republican voters are idiots!"?...
Are you bored now that the semester is over?
Wanna compare personal financial statements?
Someday you may have to move out of Mom's basement and get a job, and you'll learn that such REAL idiocy won't get you very far.
Compare personal financial statements ???
Sounds like fun please post yours.
-
What was it I was supposed to prove?
The other clown asked for a link from a site that was not "right wing leaning".
....
Well, what a lying sack o' shit you are. Either that or you really do have issues with your reading comprehension (which is maybe to be expected from a guy who calls himself "2Thick", lol.)
I did not write "left-leaning". I wrote "strongly associated with the the right-wing agenda".
Big difference there, don't ya think?
Fuck, dude. Telling easily disprovable lies to try to "win" an argument with anonymous folks on the internet? Weak shit.
-
Well, what a lying sack o' shit you are. Either that or you really do have issues with your reading comprehension (which is maybe to be expected from a guy who calls himself "2Thick", lol.)
I did not write "left-leaning". I wrote "strongly associated with the the right-wing agenda".
Big difference there, don't ya think?
Fuck, dude. Telling easily disprovable lies to try to "win" an argument with anonymous folks on the internet? Weak shit.
You specified that it should not be .... "right-wing agenda"... sorry if I got the exact wording wrong. The point is that you DIDN'T specify "left-wing agenda" as well. Do you not believe in such a thing as "left-wing agenda"?
Again, I'm usually pressed for time... sorry if the quotation was a little off. But you get my point...
-
Compare personal financial statements ???
Sounds like fun please post yours.
Not gonna post it here out in the open. PM me your details - name, address, phone & fax #s, and e-mail addy. I'll have my attorney overnight you a confidentiality agreement Monday that you'll get Tuesday. Sign it and send it back to him, then I'll have my CPA send you a copy of my business and personal financial statements from FY '13 and Q1 '14 once he gets the agreement back.
-
Out of 42 presidents, only 20 had more experience as an elected public official than Obama does now. Only 20 presidents had more experience than Obama as an elected official in Washington, D.C. In terms of his experience, Obama would be a typical president.
These are facts... Not really kneepadding if the info is actually true. Obama's a shitty prez, but his years of experience is right down the middle of where presidents have when they enter office.
Political experience? That's not as relevant as executive experience...experience actually running something. Obama had a partial term on the Senate and some tome as s state Rep in Illinois. He was a Community Organizer...but I've yet to see a clear description of what he did during that time period. Until 2009, Obama never held a job where he was the man...the shot caller...the guy who pulls everylne together for the common good. He's never shown he can lead....and that is particularly true re his time as President.
-
"My hero?" Shaddup with that clueless shit, kid. Your lack of reading comprehension seems to be an issue.
FWIW, I do have a problem with much of the government's rights abuses under Obama. Probably slightly different complaints than yours, but righties are seriously out to lunch with all that "most liberal pres ever" BS. In many ways, Obama is a right-tard.
You didn't answer the question.
How many times did your lord and savior barack the idiot obama violate the constitution?
-
I really feel bad for you if you're 50. :'(
Honestly? Why?
-
You specified that it should not be .... "right-wing agenda"... sorry if I got the exact wording wrong. The point is that you DIDN'T specify "left-wing agenda" as well. Do you not believe in such a thing as "left-wing agenda"?
Again, I'm usually pressed for time... sorry if the quotation was a little off. But you get my point...
"Exact wording" wrong? No, you got the meaning of what was written wrong.
Like I said, you may have some issues with your reading comprehension skills.
Though that's maybe to be expected if you really are reading and posting very quickly, I guess.
-
You didn't answer the question.
How many times did your lord and savior barack the idiot obama violate the constitution?
Yo, Retardio, 3 things:
1st, Obama is not my lord and savior. (No one is -- All religion is make-believe poppycock.)
2nd, why would I answer the question of someone who only posed the question as a way to dodge the request that he drop some civics knowledge on us by way of proving that he wasn't a member of the a group of, as Whork put it, "sad stupid fools with a combined intellect that doesnt match the earlier primates." (I'll admit that it's fairly unreasonable to expect anyone would want to waste time trying to disprove a contention like that, lol.)
3rd, "Violate the constitution"? That wasn't the question. Maybe you want to read back a bit.
-
bump