Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: calfzilla on May 24, 2015, 03:09:52 PM
-
Discuss.
-
Reality has a liberal basis. Discuss.
-
Discuss.
Let the liberals discuss it with each other. They're lost.
-
Let the liberals discuss it with each other. They're lost.
yep. Lost in 2008, lost in 2012...
-
yep. Lost in 2008, lost in 2012...
And devastated in 2014 because of blatant incompetence. Just because you fraud an election doesn't mean you can do the job. Out of the million times I've stated this what part of that are you not comprehending? It's not an accomplishment. Thinking like this just one reason why liberalism is a mental sickness. I mean for fucks sake, "climate change is our biggest National threat"? Who the fuck thinks this way??
-
And devastated in 2014 because of blatant incompetence. Just because you fraud an election doesn't mean you can do the job. Out of the million times I've stated this what part of that are you not comprehending? It's not an accomplishment. Thinking like this just one reason why liberalism is a mental sickness. I mean for fucks sake, "climate change is our biggest National threat"? Who the fuck thinks this way??
People who want to collect carbon taxes.
-
People who want to collect carbon taxes.
Yup
-
And devastated in 2014 because of blatant incompetence.
And nothing has changed with Repubs owning the Senate. Obama just using exec order for the past 5 years anyway, remember?
Just because you fraud an election
Which election did obama "fraud"? Which of the 2 landslide presidential wins was actually a Republican win, stolen away?
-
And devastated in 2014 because of blatant incompetence. Just because you fraud an election doesn't mean you can do the job. Out of the million times I've stated this what part of that are you not comprehending? It's not an accomplishment. Thinking like this just one reason why liberalism is a mental sickness. I mean for fucks sake, "climate change is our biggest National threat"? Who the fuck thinks this way??
No one thinks that way
It's a phony quote that right wing idiots like yourself pass around and believe to be true
This is an example of why your guys suck and no one takes you seriously (other than yourselves of course)
You lie to each other and then expect the rest of us to believe the lies you tell each other
Here's the Headline on Breitibart: Obama to coast guard grads climate change the biggest threat to national security
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/20/obama-to-coast-guard-grads-climate-change-the-biggest-threat-to-national-security/
then in the article they include a link to the text of his speech and here is what he actually said and you can't find that statement anywhere in the text of the speech.
http://wtnh.com/2015/05/20/president-obamas-speech-to-the-coast-guard-academy-graduates/
Here at the Academy, climate change — understanding the science and the consequences — is part of the curriculum, and rightly so, because it will affect everything that you do in your careers. Some of you have already served in Alaska and aboard icebreakers, and you know the effects. As America’s Maritime Guardian, you’ve pledged to remain always ready — Semper Paratus — ready for all threats. And climate change is one of those most severe threats.
Here are two paragraphs where he mentions national security and again no quote stating that climate change is the " biggest or most most severe threat to national security"
And this is not just a problem for countries on the coasts, or for certain regions of the world. Climate change will impact every country on the planet. No nation is immune. So I’m here today to say that climate change constitutes a serious threat to global security, an immediate risk to our national security. And make no mistake, it will impact how our military defends our country. And so we need to act — and we need to act now.
After all, isn’t that the true hallmark of leadership? When you’re on deck, standing your watch, you stay vigilant. You plan for every contingency. And if you see storm clouds gathering, or dangerous shoals ahead, you don’t sit back and do nothing. You take action — to protect your ship, to keep your crew safe. Anything less is negligence. It is a dereliction of duty. And so, too, with climate change. Denying it, or refusing to deal with it endangers our national security. It undermines the readiness of our forces.
-
People feel better even though they know what they believe isn't true.
-
No one thinks that way
It's a phony quote that right wing idiots like yourself pass around and believe to be true
This is an example of why your guys suck and no one takes you seriously (other than yourselves of course)
You lie to each other and then expect the rest of us to believe the lies you tell each other
Here's the Headline on Breitibart: Obama to coast guard grads climate change the biggest threat to national security
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/20/obama-to-coast-guard-grads-climate-change-the-biggest-threat-to-national-security/
then in the article they include a link to the text of his speech and here is what he actually said and you can't find that statement anywhere in the text of the speech.
http://wtnh.com/2015/05/20/president-obamas-speech-to-the-coast-guard-academy-graduates/
Here are two paragraphs where he mentions national security and again no quote stating that climate change is the " biggest or most most severe threat to national security"
Jesus Christ Strawman, fucking split hairs much? To even suggest that it even in the same category is delusional and warrants medical attention. Are you kidding me?
-
Jesus Christ Strawman, fucking split hairs much? To even suggest that it even in the same category is delusional and warrants medical attention. Are you kidding me?
i don't believe in global warming being man-made.... even if Newt, palin, Obama and Hilary believe it.
HOWEVER, IF it is real, then yes, it will effect much bigger problems than terrorists will. How many people starve or don't get water if the global temp goes up 5 or 10 degrees?
I don't blame man for it. But if it does happen, for whatever reason, it's MUCH more impactful than terrorists. I don't think some of the uneducated people on getbig will see the effects of it on a macro leve, but that's okay.
-
Sorry, but don't you folks ever get tired of arguing about who is right and who is wrong? Not everyone is so polar opposite.
I'd venture there are a whole lot of people who see themselves as being neither liberal or conservative at least to the extent some of you do. There are a whole lot of folks who take the middle ground and come to a decision about something based on it's merits or lack there of.
-
Sorry, but don't you folks ever get tired of arguing about who is right and who is wrong? Not everyone is so polar opposite.
I'd venture there are a whole lot of people who see themselves as being neither liberal or conservative at least to the extent some of you do. There are a whole lot of folks who take the middle ground and come to a decision about something based on it's merits or lack there of.
many of the people hating on liberals are the same ones taht support a shitload of liberal positions.
They hate libs... but they're okay with *some* of their positions.
-
Jesus Christ Strawman, fucking split hairs much? To even suggest that it even in the same category is delusional and warrants medical attention. Are you kidding me?
splitting hairs
are you fucking kidding me?
why didn't you simply take Obama's statement rather than change it
If you have a problem with the veracity of his actual statement then why don't you ask the question why the US Military takes this topic so seriously ?
-
And devastated in 2014 because of blatant incompetence. Just because you fraud an election doesn't mean you can do the job. Out of the million times I've stated this what part of that are you not comprehending? It's not an accomplishment. Thinking like this just one reason why liberalism is a mental sickness. I mean for fucks sake, "climate change is our biggest National threat"? Who the fuck thinks this way??
Why is it the losers always claim fraud? Is the reality that their party just wasn't what America wanted at the time to harsh for them? Kinda weird
-
Why is it the losers always claim fraud? Is the reality that their party just wasn't what America wanted at the time to harsh for them? Kinda weird
The reality was/is that the left can't run on policy because they cannot coherently defend it. Proven voter intimidation, winning 100% of the precincts, acorn, etc
-
The reality was/is that the left can't run on policy because they cannot coherently defend it. Proven voter intimidation, winning 100% of the precincts, acorn, etc
Here's the actual reality dipshit
Obama was talking at a military graduation about threats identified by military leaders
The right wing can't deal with reality so they would rather make up lies and pretend those lies are reality instead
here's the funny part - dipshits like yourself would turn on a dime if Faux News and Rush started telling you to take climate change seriously
If you have a problem with the statements of fact (i.e the fact the the US Military see climate change as a long term threat to national security) they start criticizing the military
fucking moron
-
The reality was/is that the left can't run on policy because they cannot coherently defend it. Proven voter intimidation, winning 100% of the precincts, acorn, etc
Don't know what to say... it's like arguing whether the earth is 6000 yrs old or not..
-
Sorry, but don't you folks ever get tired of arguing about who is right and who is wrong? Not everyone is so polar opposite.
I'd venture there are a whole lot of people who see themselves as being neither liberal or conservative at least to the extent some of you do. There are a whole lot of folks who take the middle ground and come to a decision about something based on it's merits or lack there of.
we can hope that's true..
-
Discuss.
Nothing to discuss. It's a statement of fact. Like a law physics.
But, I'll applaud your courage in making such a statement.
-
The reality was/is that the left can't run on policy because they cannot coherently defend it. Proven voter intimidation, winning 100% of the precincts, acorn, etc
So in your opinion - Did the Repubs win the presidency in 2008 and 2012?
-
Let's keep in mind that our phony coach truly believes he is more successful than the POTUS
mental illness much?
-
Sorry, but don't you folks ever get tired of arguing about who is right and who is wrong? Not everyone is so polar opposite.
I'd venture there are a whole lot of people who see themselves as being neither liberal or conservative at least to the extent some of you do. There are a whole lot of folks who take the middle ground and come to a decision about something based on it's merits or lack there of.
I agree there is a lot of common ground with reasonable people.
I also agree that some people don't perceive themselves as being liberal or conservative, although their words and actions say something quite different. Those folks may have trouble doing a reasonable self assessment.
-
I also agree that some people don't perceive themselves as being liberal or conservative, although their words and actions say something quite different. Those folks may have trouble doing a reasonable self assessment.
agreed. When the majory claims to be conservative, and the majority keeps electing Obama...
-
The reality was/is that the left can't run on policy because they cannot coherently defend it.
Are you opposed to gay marriage?
Proven voter intimidation, winning 100% of the precincts, acorn, etc
Joe: "Wah, my opppents are bad people. Wah. Wah. And poor little me, I'm honest. WAH! WAH!"
-
Define 'liberalism.'
-
Jesus Christ Strawman, fucking split hairs much? To even suggest that it even in the same category is delusional and warrants medical attention. Are you kidding me?
Haha. Our little short fat Mexican friend has perfected the art of writing many paragraphs without saying anything but he in fact has nothing to say. :-X
-
Haha. Our little short fat Mexican friend has perfected the art of writing many paragraphs without saying anything but he in fact has nothing to say. :-X
"You just don't get it do you?"
-
:-\
MSNBC's Reid Claims Clinton as Qualified to be President as the Founding Fathers
By Kristine Marsh | April 8, 2016
On MSNBC’s The Place for Politics April 8, a panel discussion about Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton’s fighting devolved into one MSNBC journalist praising Hillary Clinton as “qualified” as Thomas Jefferson to run for President.
Host Andrea Mitchell asked MSNBC correspondent Joy Reid what she thought about Bernie Sanders’ shot that Hillary Clinton wasn’t “qualified” to be President of the United States.
Expressing surprise that anyone would doubt Clinton’s credibility, Reid stated:
If you look at Hillary Clinton's qualifications, I mean, my God, since the Founding Fathers, has anyone tried run for president with more on their resume?
Host Andrea Mitchell offered, “John Quincy Adams, maybe.” Reid conceded:
Maybe John Quincy Adams, True, true, true, Jefferson, Adams, I mean you have to go back literally to the 18th century to find somebody with a more packed resume than Hillary Clinton.
Reid’s comment hearkens back to actress Ashley Judd’s statement in 2015 than Clinton was the most “overqualified candidate we've had since Thomas Jefferson or George Washington.”
Reid later qualified that Sanders most likely meant that Clinton’s financial ties made her “morally” unqualified.
See the full transcript from MSNBC’s The Place for Politics April 8 below:
ANDREA MITCHELL: And joining me now for our daily fix, Chris Cillizza, MSNBC contributor, founder of The Washington Post ‘Fix’ blog; Joy Reid, MSNBC national correspondent and Politico's Glenn Thrush. Welcome all.
MITCHELL: So this is a lot of what's in the eye of the beholder. A number of women, Claire McCaskill, memorably on the program yesterday said it really hit her hard. Bill Clinton just saying that he didn't mean to be, but that it does seem to be a double standard for women. Joy, what is your takeaway?
JOY REID: If you look at Hillary Clinton's qualifications, I mean, my God, since the founding fathers, has anyone tried run for president with more on their resume?
MITCHELL: John Quincy Adams maybe
REID: Maybe John Quincy Adams, True, true, true, Jefferson, Adams, I mean you have to go back literally to the 18th century to find somebody with a more packed resume than Hillary Clinton. And I think that you did have shades of that when she first ran because of this idea that a former first lady is sort of, de facto not as qualified to be president but I don’t think that is what is in play now, I think that this is more of Bernie Sanders tripling down on the idea that her connection to big money, the fact that she's connected to any kind of big money or big business makes her morally unqualified and corrupt. And that's a different problematic argument.Because it draws in people like, I don’t know, Barack Obama? So I think that is the real problem and also just on its face, absurd to say she's not qualified. I think those are the two problems for Bernie Sanders.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kristine-marsh/2016/04/08/msnbcs-reid-claims-clinton-qualified-president-founding-fathers
-
And nothing has changed with Repubs owning the Senate. Obama just using exec order for the past 5 years anyway, remember?
Which election did obama "fraud"? Which of the 2 landslide presidential wins was actually a Republican win, stolen away?
Guess you've never heard of ACORN