Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Coach is Back! on October 06, 2017, 07:20:16 AM
-
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/631-participation-rate-reaches-trump-era-high-record-number-emp
:) :)
-
https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/631-participation-rate-reaches-trump-era-high-record-number-emp
:) :)
Hey phony coach
Do you think this is a big deal?
-
Hey phony coach
Do you think this is a big deal?
Compared to your Russian collusion theories it's huge.
-
Compared to your Russian collusion theories it's huge.
that makes no sense
what's the big deal about this number to you
you're the one that brought it up ...remember
-
I told you guys to jump into the market when he got sworn in.
Trump is a winner, plain and simple.
I guess some people on here just like to bitch and complain rather than make money.
Too bad!
-
I told you guys to jump into the market when he got sworn in.
Trump is a winner, plain and simple.
I guess some people on here just like to bitch and complain rather than make money.
Too bad!
are you talking about the stock market ?
why?
this has nothing to do with that
-
Hey phony coach
Do you think this is a big deal?
Is it not good to have more employed
And less unemployed.?
-
Is it not good to have more employed
And less unemployed.?
sure, I suppose
just trying to figure out why phony coach thinks this number is so signficant
he made a thread about it so he must think it's important
-
The numbers are still fake/revised from old standards so no reason to tout them IMO.
-
The numbers are still fake/revised from old standards so no reason to tout them IMO.
really, you have some proof that this figures are fake?
I'm just trying to understand why our phony coach started this thread
what does this number mean so much to him that he chose to start a thread about it?
-
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
Changed in 1994.
-
IMO you don't need "numbers". Just drive around town and see all the Now Hiring signs that weren't there a couple years ago. And check the job ads online like cragslist. More jobs now. Lots more.
Speaking of jobs, I remember back around 08-09 I was unemployed (aside from a of security gig) it was hard as fuck finding a job. The are on Craigslist and the employment office were sparse and shit. I was one of the lucky ones to land a job in 2009. One of my friends was also unemployed and had to move back to Utah to live with his mom.
-
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
Changed in 1994.
did they go back and change all the charts prior to 1994 (including the labor participation charts) and purge all old charts?
I'm also skeptical as to how one accurately measures "short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers" or if it even matters. Even if you could accurately define and count them I don't see why they should be considered as "unemployed"
Still waiting for Joe to explain why he started this thread
why the big celebration over the 63.1% number?
-
IMO you don't need "numbers". Just drive around town and see all the Now Hiring signs that weren't there a couple years ago. And check the job ads online like cragslist. More jobs now. Lots more.
Speaking of jobs, I remember back around 08-09 I was unemployed (aside from a of security gig) it was hard as fuck finding a job. The are on Craigslist and the employment office were sparse and shit. I was one of the lucky ones to land a job in 2009. One of my friends was also unemployed and had to move back to Utah to live with his mom.
yep, the job market is much better now than it was in 2009
seemed to have gotten continuously better during 2009 to 2016
-
yep, the job market is much better now than it was in 2009
seemed to have gotten continuously better during 2009 to 2016
Yes but it was so bad it really had nowhere else to go. It's good now and I predict it will get even better. Sad there are so many able bodied people who don't want to work but that's another issue.
-
Yes but it was so bad it really had nowhere else to go. It's good now and I predict it will get even better. Sad there are so many able bodied people who don't want to work but that's another issue.
you don't think it could have gotten worse
its only peaked at 9.9%
-
you don't think it could have gotten worse
its only peaked at 9.9%
Obviously it could have gotten worse, but man those times were tough!
-
Obviously it could have gotten worse, but man those times were tough!
yep
-
you don't think it could have gotten worse
its only peaked at 9.9%
Once GOP took back congress and stopped ofagget from new laws after the disastrous Obamacare fiasco that chart looks better
-
Once GOP took back congress and stopped ofagget from new laws after the disastrous Obamacare fiasco that chart looks better
LOL
-
So no explanation from our phony coach on why he thinks this number so significant that he started a thread about it
-
sure, I suppose
just trying to figure out why phony coach thinks this number is so signficant
he made a thread about it so he must think it's important
You "suppose"? Why else wouldn't it be a good thing? But then again I "suppose" you want most government stepping in and taking over people's lives by being more dependent on it. Don't show me bullshit graphs either.
-
You "suppose"? Why else wouldn't it be a good thing? But then again I "suppose" you want most government stepping in and taking over people's lives by being more dependent on it. Don't show me bullshit graphs either.
still haven't explained why think this 63.1% number is so significant?
Is this some kind of big accomplishment for Trump?
-
still haven't explained why think this 63.1% number is so significant?
Is this some kind of big accomplishment for Trump?
Hahahah, things have changed after that stupid comment. Balls in my court by default of stupidity. Explain the "I suppose" part....lol.
-
Hahahah, things have changed after that stupid comment. Balls in my court by default of stupidity. Explain the "I suppose" part....lol.
I "suppose" it's good that people are employed. What's the downside to that? lol
-
I "suppose" it's good that people are employed. What's the downside to that? lol
again, why did you think this was so significant to make a thread about it?
just trying to understand wtf was going through you mind when you decided to make this post
-
again, why did you think this was so significant to make a thread about it?
just trying to understand wtf was going through you mind when you decided to make this post
I know you're trying to understand. Maybe you can think about it or even figure it out. Because, you know, it sucks to be employed which leads too......_____
-
I know you're trying to understand. Maybe you can think about it or even figure it out. Because, you know, it sucks to be employed which leads too......_____
I can't figure it out
it's not a big deal
tell us why you think it's a big deal
-
did they go back and change all the charts prior to 1994 (including the labor participation charts) and purge all old charts?
I'm also skeptical as to how one accurately measures "short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers" or if it even matters. Even if you could accurately define and count them I don't see why they should be considered as "unemployed"
Still waiting for Joe to explain why he started this thread
why the big celebration over the 63.1% number?
Read the chart. A liberal skeptical of accepted accounting practices...go figure. It was changed to make the charade go on.
-
Read the chart. A liberal skeptical of accepted accounting practices...go figure. It was changed to make the charade go on.
obviously you're an expert on this subject so please tell me how they accurately count "short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers"
BTW - our moronic phony coach is all worked up about 63.1% as if it's some major accomplishment when in fact Obama has higher numbers during his tenure (of course the numbers were fake then and now they're 100% genuine)
This retard can't even win a negotiation with his own team and he's about to try to "fix" NAFTA
-
I heard that Rex Tillerson thinks Trump is a moron. :)
-
I heard that Rex Tillerson thinks Trump is a moron. :)
That's FAKE NEWS
what he actually said was Fucking Moron