Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Fortress on November 05, 2017, 06:18:29 PM

Title: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 05, 2017, 06:18:29 PM
What's with this homo rubbish on The Walking Dead?

Episode's just started and buddy's smooching his dying butt buddy. The bleeding dong drainer is particularly offensive. It's tough to imagine his breath doesn't smell like a Slurpee-sized load of jizz.

One more thing. Where's all this fuckin' ammo coming from?

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 05, 2017, 06:45:11 PM
I bailed on TWD when right when they introduced Negan.  Show sucked even a little before that but it took me a while to stop watching. 

I liked the show when it started but it got queer.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Nails on November 05, 2017, 06:57:24 PM
Its shitty, why are there still fat bitches on the show.

Female fighters  ::)  all those cuunt whores would be either dead, fucking for food, or in a river washing cloths.

Doesnt gasoline go bad after 6 months to a year?
How are they still driving around?
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: judochoke on November 05, 2017, 07:45:36 PM
how come nobody Ever reloads???????????
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: sync pulse on November 05, 2017, 11:52:11 PM
Doesnt gasoline go bad after 6 months to a year?
How are they still driving around?

Yes, when you store a car long term you must drain all fluids.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 06, 2017, 01:16:04 AM
how come nobody Ever reloads???????????

Ask legendary film maker Sergio Leoni  ;D

He invented no-loading guns  :D
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: hench on November 06, 2017, 01:36:46 AM
I used to tell everyone to watch this show, now avoid! Pacing, stories not developing, shit music, shit acting,  slashed budget resulting in shit fx and sets all have brought a once great show crashing down. The entire last season went nowhere, Rick etc where in the same position as the start of the season.  Loada bollocks it has become.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 06, 2017, 01:56:12 AM
What's with this homo rubbish on The Walking Dead?

Episode's just started and buddy's smooching his dying butt buddy. The bleeding dong drainer is particularly offensive. It's tough to imagine his breath doesn't smell like a Slurpee-sized load of jizz.

One more thing. Where's all this fuckin' ammo coming from?



when the TWD was good...

 (https://i.pinimg.com/originals/aa/76/45/aa7645a940593a09925891644811bf8f.jpg)
(http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Laurie+Holden+AMC+Walking+Dead+Comic+Con+RXtnR-dUhTyl.jpg)
(https://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/tvdatabase/images/c/cc/Walking_Dead_3x09_004.jpg)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: phreak on November 06, 2017, 02:33:28 AM
I am stunned so many people still watch this. It was shite after 4 episodes (at which point I stopped watching), it should have died after season 1.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: a_pupil on November 06, 2017, 03:02:08 AM
a lot of gay agenda shit in tv shows these days
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SuperTed on November 06, 2017, 03:21:16 AM
Why do you guys bother with these TV shows? They almost all turn to shit eventually and become stale.
They all also seem to have a politically progressive agenda to them.
There will always be a gay character, a character who's gender appears ambiguous, an empowered and independent woman who is tougher and more alpha then the men...etc. You can think of almost every show and all will have at least one such character within it. I would have less problem with this if these characters were thoughtfully created but it usually just seems to be box ticking.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: robcguns on November 06, 2017, 03:26:47 AM
First few seasons were good.I haven’t watched last season or this as I got bored with it.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 06, 2017, 08:18:19 AM
I like that Daryl's just blasting everyone.

Morgan is (and has always) pissing me off. Total chump. Someone should jam that staff up his ass.

Surprised that anal invader spoken of in my initial post wasn't slurping off another zombie's decaying dong in that final scene in which he'd turned.

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Hulkotron on November 06, 2017, 08:20:11 AM
I am stunned so many people still watch this. It was shite after 4 episodes (at which point I stopped watching), it should have died after season 1.

Show it below the intellect level of most getbiggers.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: rangerwil on November 06, 2017, 08:25:53 AM
a lot of gay agenda shit in tv shows these days

oh boy...
The gay agenda isn't real. No such thing.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Grape Ape on November 06, 2017, 08:30:25 AM
Gay or not, I doubt anyone was invested in these two to actually give a shit what happened.

I watched about 5 min of the post show with them on it, and they were trying to describe how impactful the scene was, and was I like "nobody cared".

I will admit, when the gay guys' zombie version started feasting on the ass of the victim at the end, I thought it was hilarious and wondered if it was intentional or not.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Griffith on November 06, 2017, 08:51:16 AM
I haven't watched, but the ones offended probably have their own 'issues' to deal with...
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Tennisballz on November 06, 2017, 09:32:28 AM
Who cares about the walking dead?  It's a stupid tv show.  Want to watch a zombie movie, fine, go for it.  But why are any of you tuning in every week to watch this garbage.  You are part of the problem.  Treat this like the NFL.  Go do something productive with your time that will enrich YOUR life.  Learn German, take a science class, learn a trade, get an extra gym session in, learn how to cook....the list goes on.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 06, 2017, 09:35:50 AM
TV is just reflecting the world around us. They realized that people are tried of the white washing and all WASP cast.
I actually appreciate that fact the gay characters on the show aren’t the typical stereotypical lisping fairy hyper feminine gays, like Melvin goodrum, of the 90s tv shows. Or the creepy molesting gays of the 80s, like coach.  ;D
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 06, 2017, 10:07:52 AM
the most insulting part of the scene was a straight black man consoling a weeping white f a g.  NO STRAIGHT BLACK MAN GIVES A FUCK ABOUT A CRYING FAIRY WHO LOST HIS F A G!  >:(
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Grape Ape on November 06, 2017, 10:08:50 AM
Who cares about the walking dead?  It's a stupid tv show.  Want to watch a zombie movie, fine, go for it.  But why are any of you tuning in every week to watch this garbage.  You are part of the problem.  Treat this like the NFL.  Go do something productive with your time that will enrich YOUR life.  Learn German, take a science class, learn a trade, get an extra gym session in, learn how to cook....the list goes on.

The 48 min I spend on Sunday nights watching this 12-14x a year really hasn't limited me in other capacities.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 06, 2017, 10:11:12 AM
Who cares about the walking dead?  It's a stupid tv show.  Want to watch a zombie movie, fine, go for it.  But why are any of you tuning in every week to watch this garbage.  You are part of the problem.  Treat this like the NFL.  Go do something productive with your time that will enrich YOUR life.  Learn German, take a science class, learn a trade, get an extra gym session in, learn how to cook....the list goes on.

I NEVER watch shows when they are on television. I hate following the show every week. I wait until a show comes out on Netflix or Amazon Prime so I could watch it at my own pace. I dislike the fact that I have to tune in every week just to stay afloat. It just makes it easier to do whatever else I want to do and watch the show when I choose.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 06, 2017, 10:12:45 AM
The 48 min I spend on Sunday nights watching this 12-14x a year really hasn't limited me in other capacities.

While he did not say this, I think he is referring to people who spend WAY too much time in front of the television. I know people who follow like 10+ shows at any given time--or at least try. Besides going to work, their lives are spent in front of the television. Like all things in life, its about moderation.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 06, 2017, 11:59:07 AM
Vikings, Vikings season 5 will start soon ................. :D :D :D

Great new promo, Loki on Iceland & dead of Lagatta ...................
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 06, 2017, 12:03:56 PM
I NEVER watch shows when they are on television. I hate following the show every week. I wait until a show comes out on Netflix or Amazon Prime so I could watch it at my own pace. I dislike the fact that I have to tune in every week just to stay afloat. It just makes it easier to do whatever else I want to do and watch the show when I choose.

I buy DVD & watch all at once ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 06, 2017, 12:15:45 PM
Vikings, Vikings season 5 will start soon ................. :D :D :D

Great promo, Loki on Iceland & dead of Lagatta ...................

Lagertha.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: stuntmovie on November 06, 2017, 12:25:21 PM
LOKI and all, Here in Las Vegas the public libraries have a great selection of most of these up to date TV series.

I recently completed the first five seasons of Homeland and have been waiting for the library to get season 6.

Homeland has turned out to be one of my favorite TV series as well as Game of Thrones.

Years ago I watched the first season of Spartacus which starred the young  actor who died from cancer which required a new actor to fill in as Spartacus in season two which I'm just now starting to take a look at.

I assume that all public libraries in the US offer a similar opportunity to check out and watch some damn good TV series.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 06, 2017, 01:05:50 PM
Team Cuckold

(https://scontent.farn2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/23316824_1613361655389504_4279467261431845096_n.jpg?oh=35f57fd92fef4ad8e44d4f1c6c3de836&oe=5A9F9C11)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Desolate on November 06, 2017, 03:28:51 PM
I bailed on TWD when right when they introduced Negan.

Really?

Jeffrey Dean Morgan is the only reason to watch.

When he is not on, one automatically knows it will be a terrible episode.

There is supposedly a prequel-type episode for him this season where we'll get to see how he became the villain we know.

Only thing to look forward to now as the show does seem to be pushing some homo agenda.

Even Jesus the homo pretty much kicked the black guys ass on last night's episode.

All three episodes this season have been downright awful.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Desolate on November 06, 2017, 03:32:44 PM
Its shitty, why are there still fat bitches on the show.

Female fighters  ::)  all those cuunt whores would be either dead, fucking for food, or in a river washing cloths.

Doesnt gasoline go bad after 6 months to a year?
How are they still driving around?

It is ridiculously fake, especially with these women super soldiers. An old chick. A pathetic fat dyke. Only Maggie is fuckable.

Suspension of disbelief must be set to high just to get through an episode without laughing oneself to death ;D

I will admit, when the gay guys' zombie version started feasting on the ass of the victim at the end, I thought it was hilarious and wondered if it was intentional or not.

Did I miss this part? I didn't think we saw blonde homo as an actually zombie? ???

I thought homo one looked out across the field and assumed that he was out there zombiefied?

???
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Nails on November 06, 2017, 04:05:25 PM
Season 1 they had a little bit of racism in it.

now its all over the place with male faggs, female dikes, fag adopting a orphan baby, a metrosexual jesus , Interracial couples 



 Woman leaders in 3 groups  come the fuck on , world is ending and you are a man waiting on orders from a woman get the fuck out of here, not on this blue planet , not ever.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Grape Ape on November 06, 2017, 04:56:51 PM


Did I miss this part? I didn't think we saw blonde homo as an actually zombie? ???

I thought homo one looked out across the field and assumed that he was out there zombiefied?

???

Blonde homo zombie was shown crossing the street gravitating towards the herd.

Ass eating part I may have embellished a tad.....
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Megalodon on November 06, 2017, 05:04:00 PM
LOKI and all, Here in Las Vegas the public libraries have a great selection of most of these up to date TV series.

I recently completed the first five seasons of Homeland and have been waiting for the library to get season 6.

Homeland has turned out to be one of my favorite TV series as well as Game of Thrones.

Years ago I watched the first season of Spartacus which starred the young  actor who died from cancer which required a new actor to fill in as Spartacus in season two which I'm just now starting to take a look at.

I assume that all public libraries in the US offer a similar opportunity to check out and watch some damn good TV series.

Good advice for people that disdain Hollywood's cultural grip but fund Netflix and their cable company every month of their lives. 
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Nails on November 06, 2017, 05:10:04 PM
fagggots would die within 4 days without starbucks or hang themselves without their apple devices
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 06, 2017, 05:14:00 PM
fagggots would die within 4 days without starbucks or hang themselves without their apple devices

Most getbiggers would die without being able to post on getbig.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 06, 2017, 05:49:00 PM
Season 1 they had a little bit of racism in it.

now its all over the place with male faggs, female dikes, fag adopting a orphan baby, a metrosexual jesus , Interracial couples 



 Woman leaders in 3 groups  come the fuck on , world is ending and you are a man waiting on orders from a woman get the fuck out of here, not on this blue planet , not ever.
The guy nicknamed Jesus is gay, they just haven’t explored it on the tv show. He is gay in the comics.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 07, 2017, 12:40:42 AM
LOKI and all, Here in Las Vegas the public libraries have a great selection of most of these up to date TV series.

I recently completed the first five seasons of Homeland and have been waiting for the library to get season 6.

Homeland has turned out to be one of my favorite TV series as well as Game of Thrones.

Years ago I watched the first season of Spartacus which starred the young  actor who died from cancer which required a new actor to fill in as Spartacus in season two which I'm just now starting to take a look at.

I assume that all public libraries in the US offer a similar opportunity to check out and watch some damn good TV series.


Original Israeli made 'Homeland' is far more interesting & tons of banging , US version (copy) is just too soft !.

Regarding Spartacus, just too many New Zealand Maoris in that TV show  ::)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 07, 2017, 08:13:46 AM
The dark-haired lez has jumbotron tits. Check her out when she runs. They're hopping around like baby kangaroos.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Desolate on November 07, 2017, 08:31:03 AM
The guy nicknamed Jesus is gay, they just haven’t explored it on the tv show. He is gay in the comics.

Yeah, he told Maggie. Basically, he outed himself but they have done nothing with it since.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 07, 2017, 08:37:27 AM
Yeah, he told Maggie. Basically, he outed himself but they have done nothing with it since.

I just can't respect a male as a man when he's a f aggot.

Don't care if he's 300 pounds of muscle, a champion fighter and wealthy. If he's a homo, he's laughable.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: deadz on November 07, 2017, 08:39:43 AM
What's with this homo rubbish on The Walking Dead?

Episode's just started and buddy's smooching his dying butt buddy. The bleeding dong drainer is particularly offensive. It's tough to imagine his breath doesn't smell like a Slurpee-sized load of jizz.

One more thing. Where's all this fuckin' ammo coming from?


Ammo, yes where’s all this ammo coming from. Show has gone to shit.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 07, 2017, 10:12:53 AM
I just can't respect a male as a man when he's a f aggot.

Don't care if he's 300 pounds of muscle, a champion fighter and wealthy. If he's a homo, he's laughable.
Why do you care so much about who another man fucks? You sound really gay.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 07, 2017, 10:14:32 AM
Why do you care so much about who another man fucks? You sound really gay.


Fortress once stated that he has a difficult time finding a women. I guess when you're angry about one thing in life, it transfers over to other areas of life.

But, yes, it is strange why he Fortress cares. Fortress tries WAY TOO HARD to come off as a manly, tough guy.  :-\ :-\

#notfakenews
#sadfortress
#drainthegetbigswamp
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 07, 2017, 11:57:08 AM
Vikings, Vikings season 5 will start soon ................. :D :D :D

Great new promo, Loki on Iceland & dead of Lagatta ...................


I highly doubt any army on that show can defeat the...



 
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Rambone on November 07, 2017, 12:09:31 PM
I bailed on TWD when right when they introduced Negan.  Show sucked even a little before that but it took me a while to stop watching. 

I liked the show when it started but it got queer.

I stopped at the exact same time. The show got pretty boring. I tuned into the premiere just to see Glenn get his brains bashed in.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 07, 2017, 12:19:18 PM
I bailed on TWD when right when they introduced Negan.  Show sucked even a little before that but it took me a while to stop watching.  

I liked the show when it started but it got queer.

Same here, so i started following the series "The L Word" and "Queer as Folk" instead.  All Homer
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 08, 2017, 05:27:29 AM
Really?

Jeffrey Dean Morgan is the only reason to watch.

When he is not on, one automatically knows it will be a terrible episode.

There is supposedly a prequel-type episode for him this season where we'll get to see how he became the villain we know.


I found his character very off-putting.  I don't enjoy that kind of thing.  It's a step too far.

Also, there wasn't enough attractive women and I was annoyed by the geek with the mullet and I didn't find him very believable.  Dumb character, bad acting.

I didn't love the lesbians and homos crawling out of the woodwork either.  It got to a point where it was simultaneously grim, and corny.





Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 08, 2017, 05:41:01 AM

I highly doubt any army on that show can defeat the...



 

Yes, this is the kind of thing that appeals to me.

(https://68.media.tumblr.com/dfa7161b728a1e96ca1219e953100bcc/tumblr_ol2e3nxWqs1qgnqg7o3_r1_400.gif)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SquatsRule on November 08, 2017, 09:32:52 AM
I haven't watched any of the new season yet. I have the episodes on my dvr, but haven't really felt like watching it anymore. I do like Negan's sense of humor but the rest of the cast just annoy the hell out of me now.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 08, 2017, 09:47:57 AM
I haven't watched any of the new season yet. I have the episodes on my dvr, but haven't really felt like watching it anymore. I do like Negan's sense of humor but the rest of the cast just annoy the hell out of me now.

Too much PC-content these days. Everyone seems to be either GAY , someone of color or an Empowered Woman. (or all of the above!)

Gregory should bitchslap Maggie and take back that Hilltop of Peace.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 08, 2017, 09:56:48 AM
Too much PC-content these days. Everyone seems to be either GAY , someone of color or an Empowered Woman. (or all if the above!)


This is pretty much all movies and television shows now.  The agenda trumps the art.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Rambone on November 08, 2017, 09:59:29 AM
Too much PC-content these days. Everyone seems to be either GAY , someone of color or an Empowered Woman. (or all if the above!)

Gregory should bitchslap Maggie and take back that Hilltop of Peace.
Stayed tuned on ABC for a new episode of....

(http://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_limit,w_680/fl_lossy,pg_1,q_auto/rdrctqpcvl9jhkrxvwnn/the-mayor)

Followed by......

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjI3NTY2NTM0MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjE3MzgwMzI@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg)

And don’t forget to tune in tomorrow for the season finale of.....

(http://is2.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Video122/v4/eb/f5/ca/ebf5cae0-7b9e-adc1-5c9d-a78441f42103/mzl.jaxoyzdp.lsr/600x600bb-85.jpg)

We don’t have an agenda or anything. We just turned into the WB
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 08, 2017, 10:55:40 AM
I like a few of the characters, but I'll tell you this. If this scenario happened, and I existed in that world in Georgia, I wouldn't be a regular hang with any of those groups.

I'd likely take my chances roaming free.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 08, 2017, 12:29:30 PM
Stayed tuned on ABC for a new episode of....

(http://images.complex.com/complex/images/c_limit,w_680/fl_lossy,pg_1,q_auto/rdrctqpcvl9jhkrxvwnn/the-mayor)

Followed by......

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjI3NTY2NTM0MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMjE3MzgwMzI@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg)

And don’t forget to tune in tomorrow for the season finale of.....

(http://is2.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Video122/v4/eb/f5/ca/ebf5cae0-7b9e-adc1-5c9d-a78441f42103/mzl.jaxoyzdp.lsr/600x600bb-85.jpg)

We don’t have an agenda or anything. We just turned into the WB

You sure know how to get me Triggered! :D

(https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/k9RGuFo1_dddqlsuTGLBL1s6s1EJ_igGEmt65jMIYE0H3eEGuXWWt1VtmjsgvjBOVoDGfa5D7Bq6B2pk3r_kf5xp0mwcaeJhd7wk47jjDhSl2u7htOnItbGBXUlP40J7XlsAkvw5857CBbfyAK4EFig=w364-h200-nc)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 08, 2017, 12:30:43 PM
I like a few of the characters, but I'll tell you this. If this scenario happened, and I existed in that world in Georgia, I wouldn't be a regular hang with any of those groups.

I'd likely take my chances roaming free.

Yeah, in real life you'd get annoyed fairly quick on those people, would probably be arrogant and a bully to them before leaving.

Too PC and too diverse for my taste.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 08, 2017, 12:34:34 PM
Yeah, in real life you'd get annoyed fairly quick on those people, would probably be arrogant and a bully to them before leaving.

Too PC and too diverse for my taste.

But in the real world, if there was ever a zombie apocalypse, there is a good chance that a diverse range of people would be left. It's not like only straight, white people would be the only survivors. I am sure there would be a mixture of races, cultures, and sexual orientations, just by the sheer amount of people in this world. As such, is it really realistic to only have straight white people on a zombie apocalypse show? Although shows like this often require the suspension of reality, it makes sense that there has to be a modicum of some reality to the show. Hence, the diverse range of actors/actresses.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Grape Ape on November 08, 2017, 01:09:57 PM
I like a few of the characters, but I'll tell you this. If this scenario happened, and I existed in that world in Georgia, I wouldn't be a regular hang with any of those groups.

I'd likely take my chances roaming free.

I would search for a Bass Pro shop, stock up, then move up to a cabin with Maggie.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 08, 2017, 09:03:38 PM
Too much PC-content these days. Everyone seems to be either GAY , someone of color or an Empowered Woman. (or all of the above!)

Gregory should bitchslap Maggie and take back that Hilltop of Peace.

You seem to be obsessed with matters in the USA while Arabs and Africans are pillaging your viking villages. I can't figure out if you are a lonely idiot in a land of ice princesses or a troll?   
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: phreak on November 09, 2017, 12:48:26 AM
But in the real world, if there was ever a zombie apocalypse, there is a good chance that a diverse range of people would be left. It's not like only straight, white people would be the only survivors. I am sure there would be a mixture of races, cultures, and sexual orientations, just by the sheer amount of people in this world. As such, is it really realistic to only have straight white people on a zombie apocalypse show? Although shows like this often require the suspension of reality, it makes sense that there has to be a modicum of some reality to the show. Hence, the diverse range of actors/actresses.
Diverse, as in skin colour and sexual orientation? Sure. But proportionally it would be what it is supposed to be in the natural state: rare. Based on which numbers you take, having a single gay guy in a group of 20 would be unusual. Having multiple gay couples is technically possible but statistically extremely unlikely.

Also, there would be diversity as mentioned earlier, but not nearly as much diversity of personality. It only makes sense that the mentally weak get weeded out first, so having a score of lazy and whiny bitches (both genders) is also extremely unlikely. Those people do not survive a common cold, let alone an apocalypse.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: werewolf operative on November 09, 2017, 01:33:57 AM
But in the real world, if there was ever a zombie apocalypse, there is a good chance that a diverse range of people would be left. It's not like only straight, white people would be the only survivors. I am sure there would be a mixture of races, cultures, and sexual orientations, just by the sheer amount of people in this world. As such, is it really realistic to only have straight white people on a zombie apocalypse show? Although shows like this often require the suspension of reality, it makes sense that there has to be a modicum of some reality to the show. Hence, the diverse range of actors/actresses.

(http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/nazi-gif-16-1.gif)

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 09, 2017, 06:56:20 AM
(http://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/nazi-gif-16-1.gif)



 ;D
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 09, 2017, 07:03:48 AM
Diverse, as in skin colour and sexual orientation? Sure. But proportionally it would be what it is supposed to be in the natural state: rare. Based on which numbers you take, having a single gay guy in a group of 20 would be unusual. Having multiple gay couples is technically possible but statistically extremely unlikely.

Also, there would be diversity as mentioned earlier, but not nearly as much diversity of personality. It only makes sense that the mentally weak get weeded out first, so having a score of lazy and whiny bitches (both genders) is also extremely unlikely. Those people do not survive a common cold, let alone an apocalypse.

I stopped after season 2, so don't know how much diversity was included in later seasons.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 09, 2017, 09:01:37 AM
Diverse, as in skin colour and sexual orientation? Sure. But proportionally it would be what it is supposed to be in the natural state: rare. Based on which numbers you take, having a single gay guy in a group of 20 would be unusual. Having multiple gay couples is technically possible but statistically extremely unlikely.

Also, there would be diversity as mentioned earlier, but not nearly as much diversity of personality. It only makes sense that the mentally weak get weeded out first, so having a score of lazy and whiny bitches (both genders) is also extremely unlikely. Those people do not survive a common cold, let alone an apocalypse.
20? Rick’s group is 20 least by itself. Add the hilltop, saviors, the “all women place” and those junk hipsters and you got over 300 people easy. Statically 3 gay dudes and a lesbian isn’t far off. The show also take place in Georgia. The atl is always rank as one the top gayest cities. So you need to factor that in as well.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 09, 2017, 11:24:27 AM
20? Rick’s group is 20 least by itself. Add the hilltop, saviors, the “all women place” and those junk hipsters and you got over 300 people easy. Statically 3 gay dudes and a lesbian isn’t far off. The show also take place in Georgia. The atl is always rank as one the top gayest cities. So you need to factor that in as well.

"U.S. Homosexuality - Statistics & Facts: Approximately one in 100 American women and two in 100 American men identify as homosexual, with another four percent of Americans identifying as bisexual."

According to sources, 347 characters have been introduced on The Walking Dead. So, there are 300+ in the Walking Dead. 1 in 100 and 2 in 100 American women and men identify as gay. Thus, having 3-4 gay people in the show is not that unlikely. Not to mention, that percentage wise, Atlanta has a bigger percentage of gay people than NYC. Further, there are way more Black people than gays, which obviously increases the chances that they would be among the 347 characters.

I guess the issue was that I didn't know how many people there were in the show and whether the gay people all belonged to the same group or were spread out. Further, how many people are considered main characters vs. fillers.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Beefjake on November 09, 2017, 12:01:24 PM

I highly doubt any army on  :'(that show can defeat the...
Lol, super soldier who tried to use 9 feet spears in close quaters combat...
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 09, 2017, 12:27:48 PM
But in the real world, if there was ever a zombie apocalypse, there is a good chance that a diverse range of people would be left. It's not like only straight, white people would be the only survivors. I am sure there would be a mixture of races, cultures, and sexual orientations, just by the sheer amount of people in this world. As such, is it really realistic to only have straight white people on a zombie apocalypse show? Although shows like this often require the suspension of reality, it makes sense that there has to be a modicum of some reality to the show. Hence, the diverse range of actors/actresses.

Uh no, in the event of a zombie apocalypse, you'd rather gather all your mates, arm yourself to the teeth and bunker up in the closest safehouse and avoid other groups.

You'd avoid colored groups at all cost since they can't be trusted and they'd only want your stuff.

Even if it turned out all the friends and close ones had turned to zomboids, i'd rather go solo than group up with some liberal pc-girls or coloreds.

Less chance of survival solo than in a group? Usually yes, but it all depends on the group.

Teamwork is key.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 09, 2017, 12:32:05 PM
Uh no, in the event of a zombie apocalypse, you'd rather gather all your mates, arm yourself to the teeth and bunker up in the closest safehouse and avoid other groups.

You'd avoid colored groups at all cost since they can't be trusted and they'd only want your stuff.

Even if it turned out all the friends and close ones had turned to zomboids, i'd rather go solo than group up with some liberal pc-girls or coloreds.

Less chance of survival solo than in a group? Usually yes, but it all depends on the group.

Teamwork is key.

It depends on how many people are left. You really cannot say unless you were in such dire consequences. There are too many factors to consider to determine whether you would stay within your own group or not, especially if all of your mates/friends/family are dead. You may have no other option but to join an out-group. People do dire things in the face of extreme circumstances.  Going solo, you would almost inevitably die.

However, the reality is that in the face of a zombie apocalypse, many people would take the chance of joining an out-group in order to survive--not many would choose to go solo. Obviously, you're no different.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 09, 2017, 12:38:28 PM
It depends on how many people are left. You really cannot say unless you were in such dire consequences. There are too many factors to consider to determine whether you would stay within your own group or not, especially if all of your mates/friends/family are dead. You may have no other option but to join an out-group. People do dire things in the face of extreme circumstances.  Going solo, you would almost inevitably die.

However, the reality is that in the face of a zombie apocalypse, many people would take the chance of joining an out-group in order to survive--not many would choose to go solo. Obviously, you're no different. Of course, you want to appear manly on getbig. However, in such extreme circumstances, you would surely join a group, especially if you needed food, water, shelter, or guns/ammo.

Nah, i don't care about that at all (appear manly lol), i'm too old and been through too much to care about appearance these days. (not in my 30s anymore)
Couldn't care less on how i appear these days.

I'd rather take my chances solo and probably die due to zombies than group up with some liberals or coloreds. Listening to that mumbo jumbo is prolonged torture.

I am not afraid of death, i've seen too much death in my life already and endured enough loss.

But if there is something i cannot stand , that's liberals cunnts and coloreds. Grouping with those would sooner or later push me over the edge and do a "Falling Down" on them.

Better to try stay alive as long as you can until you find some like-minded groups/individuals. If that doesn't work, so be it.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 09, 2017, 12:41:56 PM
Nah, i don't care about that at all (appear manly lol), i'm too old and been through too much to care about appearance these days. (not in my 30s anymore)
Couldn't care less on how i appear these days.

I'd rather take my chances solo and probably die due to zombies than group up with some liberals or coloreds. Listening to that mumbo jumbo is prolonged torture.

I am not afraid of death, i've seen too much death in my life already and endured enough loss.

But if there is something i cannot stand , that's liberals cunnts and coloreds. Grouping with those would sooner or later push me over the edge and do a "Falling Down" on them.

Better to try stay alive as long as you can until you find some like-minded groups/individuals. If that doesn't work, so be it.

I seriously doubt during life and death, liberals would stop in the middle of being chased by zombies to preach (mumbo jumbo) about anything.

The fact is, people need others to survive. You would be surprised how many solo people eventually join a group, especially for long-term survival.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Powerlift66 on November 09, 2017, 12:44:41 PM
I watch merely because wife and I are huge horror fans,and there's really nothing on to watch right now.
So it takes up very little time, 1 hour per night as we do each weekday to unwind before bed. (When nothing else is on, we watch "Cops" or ID Channel or Family Guy).

On weekends we'll watch movies that I download from usenet, or from our Amazon Prime account.
We usually stop the movies because we are too buzzed up to watch and end up getting her clothes off of her and make the most of our time. :o
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Moontrane on November 09, 2017, 12:50:10 PM
I stopped at the exact same time. The show got pretty boring. I tuned into the premiere just to see Glenn get his brains bashed in.

Negan's like a malevolent game show host.  His schtick grew old quickly: "Shall we cut of you son's hand, bash in your friend's skull, or see what's behind curtain number 3?"
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 09, 2017, 12:53:45 PM
I seriously doubt during life and death, liberals would stop in the middle of being chased by zombies to preach (mumbo jumbo) about anything.

The fact is, people need others to survive. You would be surprised how many solo people eventually join a group, especially for long-term survival.
They say beggars can't be choosy, but even in a Zombie Apocalypse, i will be choosy, and choose those i prefer to group with.

It's a matter of just trying to stay alive until you find what you look for. If you don't , then so be it.
I can embrace that.

In a Zombie Apocalypse, i will admit that i would probably shoot coloreds and swarthy looking mussies on sight before they get close.

Eventually ammo will run out or i would be shot first.

I know you are trying SF1900, and i commend your persistence, but i am sorry, i just don't like em.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 09, 2017, 12:57:05 PM
They say beggars can't be choosy, but even in a Zombie Apocalypse, i will be choosy, and choose those i prefer to group with.

It's a matter of just trying to stay alive until you find what you look for. If you don't , then so be it.
I can embrace that.

In a Zombie Apocalypse, i will admit that i would probably shoot coloreds and swarthy looking mussies on sight before they get close.

Eventually ammo will run out or i would be shot first.

I know you are trying SF1900, and i commend your persistence, but i am sorry, i just don't like em.

This has nothing to do with "liking." I really don't care who you like or don't like. I am not trying to make you like anyone.

I am saying that personal feelings would often get put aside in life and death situations. Many people who dislike X would quickly join their side if their life depended on it. The "game" changes during extreme circumstances. I am debating from that perspective, not whether or not you simply like them.

But, of course, we will never know how you would truly behave in that situation until you are put in that situation. So, I really can't say one way or another.

Question: If you saw Parker or Drkage wondering alone during a zombie apocalypse, would you join their side?
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 09, 2017, 01:00:33 PM
You seem to be obsessed with matters in the USA while Arabs and Africans are pillaging your viking villages. I can't figure out if you are a lonely idiot in a land of ice princesses or a troll?    

I don't mind them staying in Africa or the Middle-East.

It's when they encroach on western and northern territories i take affront, regardless if they have encroached USA, UK, France or Scandinavia.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 09, 2017, 01:19:19 PM
I’d be like Daryl is now, just gunning down anyone who isn’t someone I’ve already come to trust. And without question I wouldn’t partner, even temporarily, with a darkie or Moozie. Or any woman who would think she had a say in anything.

You’re washing t-shirts and whipping up critter hot dogs, sugar tits.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 09, 2017, 02:04:03 PM
"U.S. Homosexuality - Statistics & Facts: Approximately one in 100 American women and two in 100 American men identify as homosexual, with another four percent of Americans identifying as bisexual."

According to sources, 347 characters have been introduced on The Walking Dead. So, there are 300+ in the Walking Dead. 1 in 100 and 2 in 100 American women and men identify as gay. Thus, having 3-4 gay people in the show is not that unlikely. Not to mention, that percentage wise, Atlanta has a bigger percentage of gay people than NYC. Further, there are way more Black people than gays, which obviously increases the chances that they would be among the 347 characters.

I guess the issue was that I didn't know how many people there were in the show and whether the gay people all belonged to the same group or were spread out. Further, how many people are considered main characters vs. fillers.
There are men that have sex with men, that identify as straight or bi and not gay. If you google it 6.2% men have had a same sex experience. That is a lot of people in the closet, you would think that the end of the world would cause some people to get out of the closet.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: NelsonMuntz on November 09, 2017, 02:17:47 PM
20? Rick’s group is 20 least by itself. Add the hilltop, saviors, the “all women place” and those junk hipsters and you got over 300 people easy. Statically 3 gay dudes and a lesbian isn’t far off. The show also take place in Georgia. The atl is always rank as one the top gayest cities. So you need to factor that in as well.

so with the geography and grooviness it would be entirely plausible that Goodrum and Vissy would be reunited on the show?
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 09, 2017, 02:27:35 PM
so with the geography and grooviness it would be entirely plausible that Goodrum and Vissy would be reunited on the show?
Naw, no survivor skills. vissy would be eating by goodrum as soon as he runs out of royal jelly, and goodrum would be filming a YouTube video bitching about the whole thing.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: NelsonMuntz on November 09, 2017, 02:41:32 PM
Naw, no survivor skills. vissy would be eating by goodrum as soon as he runs out of royal jelly, and goodrum would be filming a YouTube video bitching about the whole thing.

haha true


the only women getbiggers would get stuck with during a zombie apocalypse would probably be Cailynn Jenner and Rosie O'Donnel
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 09, 2017, 03:08:12 PM
The walking dead sucks anyway. You guys should be watching mr Robot or at least watching fear the walking dead
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 09, 2017, 06:57:46 PM
Crossbow Daryl is my favourite character 8)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 10, 2017, 03:11:24 PM
Crossbow Daryl is my favourite character 8)
Only good character
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 10, 2017, 03:27:43 PM
Only good character

I don't know about that.   I kind of like Carol.  She is a cold hearted bad ass who will kill anyone and not blink.   When she gunned down that little girl the other season, you kept expecting her to change her mind.  Instead was "look at the flowers..."  BANG!!

Morgan was kind of ok until he went overboard with that Thou Shall Not Kill bullshit

I'm kind of thinking that if Shane had lived for another two seasons the entire zombie apocalypse would be over by now.  He would have killed everyone (dead or alive) he came across.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 10, 2017, 06:27:05 PM
I don't know about that.   I kind of like Carol.  She is a cold hearted bad ass who will kill anyone and not blink.   When she gunned down that little girl the other season, you kept expecting her to change her mind.  Instead was "look at the flowers..."  BANG!!

Morgan was kind of ok until he went overboard with that Thou Shall Not Kill bullshit

I'm kind of thinking that if Shane had lived for another two seasons the entire zombie apocalypse would be over by now.  He would have killed everyone (dead or alive) he came across.
Morgan walks like he is wearing lifts, I think he is.  He can’t pass for a badass with that funny walk.
Carol is ok, her character has really been under used. Michonne was good until they clipped her wings.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 11, 2017, 01:34:06 AM
Only good character

Crossbow & bike man  ;)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 13, 2017, 12:08:17 AM
LOL, they just killed off the tiger to cut the SFX budget. Even GOT isn't stupid enough to kill off all the dragons. What a crap show!  If I was a core actor I'd go to the producers and asked to be killed off b/f I'm 100% typecast. Jon Bernthal, Shane, looks like a genius now.  Oh, and they still found time to have two dudes hug before the big battle.  ::)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: phreak on November 13, 2017, 12:57:59 AM
20? Rick’s group is 20 least by itself. Add the hilltop, saviors, the “all women place” and those junk hipsters and you got over 300 people easy. Statically 3 gay dudes and a lesbian isn’t far off. The show also take place in Georgia. The atl is always rank as one the top gayest cities. So you need to factor that in as well.
As I said, I haven't watched more than 3-4 episodes before it got boring, so I don't know the specifics.

Statistically speaking: Even if 3 gay dudes is likely, then it is fairly crass to assume they would be each other's type. Quite sure not all men on the show would want to pork every available woman.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Simple Simon on November 13, 2017, 01:17:33 AM
never watched an episode....never will.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: residue on November 13, 2017, 07:12:18 AM
LOL, they just killed off the tiger to cut the SFX budget. Even GOT isn't stupid enough to kill off all the dragons. What a crap show!  If I was a core actor I'd go to the producers and asked to be killed off b/f I'm 100% typecast. Jon Bernthal, Shane, looks like a genius now.  Oh, and they still found time to have two dudes hug before the big battle.  ::)

The tiger dies in the comics, they have a source material to work off of.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: residue on November 13, 2017, 07:13:05 AM
As I said, I haven't watched more than 3-4 episodes before it got boring, so I don't know the specifics.

Statistically speaking: Even if 3 gay dudes is likely, then it is fairly crass to assume they would be each other's type. Quite sure not all men on the show would want to pork every available woman.

gay for the stay
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Pray_4_War on November 13, 2017, 07:25:16 AM
"U.S. Homosexuality - Statistics & Facts: Approximately one in 100 American women and two in 100 American men identify as homosexual, with another four percent of Americans identifying as bisexual."

According to sources, 347 characters have been introduced on The Walking Dead. So, there are 300+ in the Walking Dead. 1 in 100 and 2 in 100 American women and men identify as gay. Thus, having 3-4 gay people in the show is not that unlikely. Not to mention, that percentage wise, Atlanta has a bigger percentage of gay people than NYC. Further, there are way more Black people than gays, which obviously increases the chances that they would be among the 347 characters.

I guess the issue was that I didn't know how many people there were in the show and whether the gay people all belonged to the same group or were spread out. Further, how many people are considered main characters vs. fillers.

Something tells me that homos are less likely to posses the skills to survive in a zombie apocalypse than heterosexual men but who knows I could be wrong.

(http://watchmanscry.com/watch/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Richard-Simmons.jpg)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Nails on November 13, 2017, 07:58:31 AM
guy zig zagging around walkers while speeding down the high way in a army hummer  ......  ::)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 13, 2017, 08:24:16 AM
guy zig zagging around walkers while speeding down the high way in a army hummer  ......  ::)

Maybe zombies have acid blood like Aliens. I'm just saying.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Slik on November 13, 2017, 08:30:21 AM
Was looking for 9 of my getbig brothers to go to the zoo with me to beat up a tiger. Who’s in?
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 13, 2017, 08:40:59 AM
Was looking for 9 of my getbig brothers to go to the zoo with me to beat up a tiger. Who’s in?

Find SuckMyMuscle and you won't need the other eight
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 13, 2017, 02:46:55 PM
Morgan walks like he is wearing lifts, I think he is.  He can’t pass for a badass with that funny walk.
Carol is ok, her character has really been under used. Michonne was good until they clipped her wings.


Morgan has loose bolts in his melon. Way too wishy-washy. Plus, yes, he’s a gimp. Dude’s walk is ridiculous. An inferior physical entity. Plus he’s black.

Carol is OK. She just cruises around offing folks. I can dig that. (I wonder if her bush is grey.)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Bindare_Dundat on November 13, 2017, 02:49:25 PM
I bailed on TWD when right when they introduced Negan.  Show sucked even a little before that but it took me a while to stop watching.  

I liked the show when it started but it got queer.

exactly. it's total rubbish. the speeches these idiots give are embarrassing as fuck
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 13, 2017, 03:20:54 PM
Something tells me that homos are less likely to posses the skills to survive in a zombie apocalypse than heterosexual men but who knows I could be wrong.

(http://watchmanscry.com/watch/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Richard-Simmons.jpg)

You're basing it on the assumption that people react the same in extreme circumstances.

Under extreme pressures, people react much differently--social psychology has demonstrated this across different experiments. Put people under specific conditions and they do horrific things. The Prison Experiment (Zimbardo), where individuals who were assigned the role of guards, actually started to exhibit horrific treatment toward "prisoners." Or, Milgram's experiment, where people started to "shock" other people when certain environmental variables were changed. And, these were just made up scenarios--yet, people displayed horrific behavior toward their fellow human. Another analogy is when the 85 year old grandmother lifts the car off her grandchild--again, a person is put in an extreme situation and reacts differently than what would be expected.

Under extreme circumstances, you would be surprised what sort of skills people possess. I simply don't have the answer because we have nothing to compare a zombie apocalypse to (obviously). All we have are contrived situations that have demonstrated that people drastically change their behavior under certain conditions.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 13, 2017, 03:24:20 PM
As I said, I haven't watched more than 3-4 episodes before it got boring, so I don't know the specifics.

Statistically speaking: Even if 3 gay dudes is likely, then it is fairly crass to assume they would be each other's type. Quite sure not all men on the show would want to pork every available woman.

No, it's not. In real life, if you you have a few hundred people left in a population, it wouldn't matter if X is your type. Selection pressures would dictate who you can mate with and have a relationship with. People wouldn't be so choosy with such as small population left. You think if there are 500 hundred people left in a population, person X is going to say, "Nope, I don't want to date/mate person Y because they have blond hair. I only prefer brunettes."  Um, no. So, its totally plausible that in such a small population, people would be mating/entering into a relationship with people who are not exactly their type.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: NelsonMuntz on November 13, 2017, 03:27:51 PM
Something tells me that homos are less likely to posses the skills to survive in a zombie apocalypse than heterosexual men but who knows I could be wrong.

(http://watchmanscry.com/watch/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Richard-Simmons.jpg)



On a sidenote, you guys realize they are setting Crossbow Daryl to be an upcoming homo on the show...

think about it
-only original character not to get laid
-women have come on to him etc many times, he does not go for the pussy
-was doing those missions with the other gay before the Negan stuff showed up
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 13, 2017, 03:31:06 PM
No, it's not. In real life, if you you have a few hundred people left in a population, it wouldn't matter if X is your type. Selection pressures would dictate who you can mate with and have a relationship with. People wouldn't be so choosy with such as small population left. You think if there are 500 hundred people left in a population, person X is going to say, "Nope, I don't want to date/mate person Y because they have blond hair. I only prefer brunettes."  Um, no. So, its totally plausible that in such a small population, people would be mating/entering into a relationship with people who are not exactly their type.
Yup, In the end of the world, I think hair color is the last thing you look at when looking for pussy.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Kwon on November 13, 2017, 03:37:00 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/WgzYjNcfhQpmU/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 13, 2017, 03:39:21 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/WgzYjNcfhQpmU/giphy.gif)

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: seCrawler on November 13, 2017, 11:46:01 PM
in a life and death battle on star trek discovery, he took time to tell the doc (black guy) he loved him  ::)

 (https://i1.wp.com/www.tor.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/st-chooseyourpain2.png?type=vertical&ssl=1)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: phreak on November 13, 2017, 11:56:47 PM
No, it's not. In real life, if you you have a few hundred people left in a population, it wouldn't matter if X is your type. Selection pressures would dictate who you can mate with and have a relationship with. People wouldn't be so choosy with such as small population left. You think if there are 500 hundred people left in a population, person X is going to say, "Nope, I don't want to date/mate person Y because they have blond hair. I only prefer brunettes."  Um, no. So, its totally plausible that in such a small population, people would be mating/entering into a relationship with people who are not exactly their type.
You have a very limited view of sexual attraction, if you assume it is just hair colour differences. Many gays find the big, hairy musclebear look sexy, and simply will not fuck anyone else, no matter how traditionally attractive. Or put it in more practical terms: You would happily bang geriatric fat women, if no hot whores were available?

Also, how would they even know who was gay or not? Would the gays just make a move on every available and armed man, running the distinct risk of getting beaten up or killed? Makes no sense.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Griffith on November 14, 2017, 01:37:01 PM
No, it's not. In real life, if you you have a few hundred people left in a population, it wouldn't matter if X is your type. Selection pressures would dictate who you can mate with and have a relationship with. People wouldn't be so choosy with such as small population left. You think if there are 500 hundred people left in a population, person X is going to say, "Nope, I don't want to date/mate person Y because they have blond hair. I only prefer brunettes."  Um, no. So, its totally plausible that in such a small population, people would be mating/entering into a relationship with people who are not exactly their type.

Correct.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 14, 2017, 01:59:14 PM
You have a very limited view of sexual attraction, if you assume it is just hair colour differences. Many gays find the big, hairy musclebear look sexy, and simply will not fuck anyone else, no matter how traditionally attractive. Or put it in more practical terms: You would happily bang geriatric fat women, if no hot whores were available?

Also, how would they even know who was gay or not? Would the gays just make a move on every available and armed man, running the distinct risk of getting beaten up or killed? Makes no sense.

You keep failing to take into consideration that we are talking about an extreme circumstance.

Social Psychology has already demonstrated that under EXTREME conditions, people's preferences, behaviors, and choices, become drastically modified. Zimbardo, a Social Psychologist, conducted a prison study and assigned people to either a guard or prisoner. Study subjects, who were assigned the role as guard, began to exhibit extreme forms of physical punishment toward the prisoners; and these were people with no history of aggressive behavior. The Milgram experiment also demonstrated that people would routinely shock another person under specific environmental conditions. Further, research has also shown that men who are in prison will have sex with other men; however, once they leave prison, they never have relations with men.

So, yes, if a Zombie apocalypse (ZA) occurred, you would find men and women sleeping together who would normally not be attracted to each other. Further, you are using an extreme example to try and prove your point. While some men would not have sex with an elderly geriatric patient, most men in a zombie apocalypse would have sex with a women who was not exactly his type (if he preferred a women who was tall and slender, but the women was short and chunky). Not many men are going to say, "Sorry, you're 5'4" with black hair, not 5'9" with blonde hair, therefore I cannot have sex with you, despite the fact that there are only 500 people left in the world). And, for what it's worth, yes, you would likely have some men, if not, a lot of men, having sex with elderly overweight people. And, where did I state that they would HAPPILY have sex with an elderly geriatric patient? Please, point that out to me. I never stated what the emotional content surrounding sex during a ZA would be. However, with a dwindling population, you would likely not be happy having sex with an elderly geriatric population; however, despite not being happy about this, you may still have sex with an elderly geriatric patient due to extreme circumstances (ZA).

As for your statement, "Many gays find the big, hairy musclebear look sexy, and simply will not fuck anyone else, no matter how traditionally attractive." Well, this is true with a population of 7 billion people (less so, obviously, if you are specifically talking about gay people). This would drastically change if the population dwindled to 500 after a ZA. But, your statement shows that you're still operating under the assumption that there is not a ZA, and thus, people still had a variety of options. They don't.

"Also, how would they even know who was gay or not? Would the gays just make a move on every available and armed man, running the distinct risk of getting beaten up or killed?" Probably not, but they could easily just say, "Hey, I'm gay."

Really, there is no way to demonstrate who is right, since a ZA has never occurred. However, there is ample evidence that under extreme circumstances, peoples behaviors, preferences, and choices, do change. Thus, I think I have more than enough evidence to suggest that people's sexual preferences would be set aside during a ZA. I obviously cannot assert that EVERY person would operate under my assumption; but, yeah, I think in a population of 500 (or however many are left: 5000, 10000), there is an extremely good chance that 3 gay guys (or straight) would likely have sex with each other, despite that person not being their type.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 14, 2017, 02:34:43 PM
If greasy Daryl gets outed as homo, I am out.

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: phreak on November 15, 2017, 01:00:08 AM
You keep failing to take into consideration that we are talking about an extreme circumstance.

Social Psychology has already demonstrated that under EXTREME conditions, people's preferences, behaviors, and choices, become drastically modified. Zimbardo, a Social Psychologist, conducted a prison study and assigned people to either a guard or prisoner. Study subjects, who were assigned the role as guard, began to exhibit extreme forms of physical punishment toward the prisoners; and these were people with no history of aggressive behavior. The Milgram experiment also demonstrated that people would routinely shock another person under specific environmental conditions. Further, research has also shown that men who are in prison will have sex with other men; however, once they leave prison, they never have relations with men.
Good for you, you read up on psych 101. Just a complete non sequitur. You claim that under extreme conditions people's preferences change (implying but not stating sexual preferences, which would be germane to the topic at hand), yet neither of these experiments proves that in the slightest. Romantic and/or sexual attraction was part of neither of these studies. Try again.

Quote
So, yes, if a Zombie apocalypse (ZA) occurred, you would find men and women sleeping together who would normally not be attracted to each other. Further, you are using an extreme example to try and prove your point. While some men would not have sex with an elderly geriatric patient, most men in a zombie apocalypse would have sex with a women who was not exactly his type (if he preferred a women who was tall and slender, but the women was short and chunky).
You accuse me of using extremes to use my point, yet you are at least as guilty of doing so. Your premise is based on two pillars: All men have little or no self respect, and implicitly assuming all available options would be different yet still attractive. Both are patently ludicrous. You may have so little self respect that you would fuck any ugly hag, but not all men have such low standards. The MGTOW movement and Japan's sexlessness proves that even with availability of women, men frequently opt out.

That all available options would be acceptable, just different types of nice... I'm not even going into that in detail, it is such a ridiculous assumption. I invite you to look around you on the street. All those mingers you see, that is the population that would get sampled randomly. Extreme fatties likely excluded due to them being killed off. There'd be plenty of 200-Lb, pockmarked heavy smokers left alive, very few that would even qualify as good enough for a girl-next-door look.

Quote
Not many men are going to say, "Sorry, you're 5'4" with black hair, not 5'9" with blonde hair, therefore I cannot have sex with you, despite the fact that there are only 500 people left in the world). And, for what it's worth, yes, you would likely have some men, if not, a lot of men, having sex with elderly overweight people.
Moving the goal posts, unfounded assertions... where to start?

To expand on your example to make it realistic:
"Sorry, you're 5'4", 180 Lbs, with black hair, an average if not downright ugly face and an average personality, not 5'9" with blonde hair, therefore I cannot have sex with you, despite the fact that there are only 500 people left in the world". Is the point starting to sink in?

And to your assertion about men (even a lot of men now?) having sex with elderly overweight people: I can see women and gay men doing that in case those people have resources. Simply and purely out of sexual needs? I still have not seen any proof for that. Then again: Possibly this depends on self respect, I cannot envision such a scenario for myself. Porn would be preferable to that.

Quote
And, where did I state that they would HAPPILY have sex with an elderly geriatric patient? Please, point that out to me.
So you would have sex against your will, and not just jerk off instead? In the normal world choosing to have sex with someone does imply some form of happiness. Unless one is a rape victim perhaps.

Quote
I never stated what the emotional content surrounding sex during a ZA would be. However, with a dwindling population, you would likely not be happy having sex with an elderly geriatric population; however, despite not being happy about this, you may still have sex with an elderly geriatric patient due to extreme circumstances (ZA).
May, may, may... surely with a large enough population anything can and will happen. Is it likely though? Still no proof for any of it.

Quote
As for your statement, "Many gays find the big, hairy musclebear look sexy, and simply will not fuck anyone else, no matter how traditionally attractive." Well, this is true with a population of 7 billion people (less so, obviously, if you are specifically talking about gay people). This would drastically change if the population dwindled to 500 after a ZA. But, your statement shows that you're still operating under the assumption that there is not a ZA, and thus, people still had a variety of options. They don't.
Of course I bow to your utterly unfounded certainty on how people behave during such an event. It is clear to me now that you do not need facts or logic, you have in fact lived it, to speak with such absolute certainty! I will throw my opini ons on an utterly fictitious scenario overboard and blindly follow your assertions instead.

[/quote]"Also, how would they even know who was gay or not? Would the gays just make a move on every available and armed man, running the distinct risk of getting beaten up or killed?" Probably not, but they could easily just say, "Hey, I'm gay."

Really, there is no way to demonstrate who is right, since a ZA has never occurred. However, there is ample evidence that under extreme circumstances, peoples behaviors, preferences, and choices, do change. Thus, I think I have more than enough evidence to suggest that people's sexual preferences would be set aside during a ZA. I obviously cannot assert that EVERY person would operate under my assumption; but, yeah, I think in a population of 500 (or however many are left: 5000, 10000), there is an extremely good chance that 3 gay guys (or straight) would likely have sex with each other, despite that person not being their type.
[/quote]You can be as convinced of your own assertions as you like, knock yourself out. Taking proof for some behavioural changes as proof for a complete throwing overboard of sexual preferences ("people's sexual preferences would be set aside during a ZA") which were not covered in the few things you do cite is an interesting scientific strategy. I'd call it fraudulent, if it wasn't simply based on a lack of understanding of the scientific method.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Simple Simon on November 15, 2017, 01:04:55 AM
You keep failing to take into consideration that we are talking about an extreme circumstance.

Social Psychology has already demonstrated that under EXTREME conditions, people's preferences, behaviors, and choices, become drastically modified. Zimbardo, a Social Psychologist, conducted a prison study and assigned people to either a guard or prisoner. Study subjects, who were assigned the role as guard, began to exhibit extreme forms of physical punishment toward the prisoners; and these were people with no history of aggressive behavior. The Milgram experiment also demonstrated that people would routinely shock another person under specific environmental conditions. Further, research has also shown that men who are in prison will have sex with other men; however, once they leave prison, they never have relations with men.

So, yes, if a Zombie apocalypse (ZA) occurred, you would find men and women sleeping together who would normally not be attracted to each other. Further, you are using an extreme example to try and prove your point. While some men would not have sex with an elderly geriatric patient, most men in a zombie apocalypse would have sex with a women who was not exactly his type (if he preferred a women who was tall and slender, but the women was short and chunky). Not many men are going to say, "Sorry, you're 5'4" with black hair, not 5'9" with blonde hair, therefore I cannot have sex with you, despite the fact that there are only 500 people left in the world). And, for what it's worth, yes, you would likely have some men, if not, a lot of men, having sex with elderly overweight people. And, where did I state that they would HAPPILY have sex with an elderly geriatric patient? Please, point that out to me. I never stated what the emotional content surrounding sex during a ZA would be. However, with a dwindling population, you would likely not be happy having sex with an elderly geriatric population; however, despite not being happy about this, you may still have sex with an elderly geriatric patient due to extreme circumstances (ZA).

As for your statement, "Many gays find the big, hairy musclebear look sexy, and simply will not fuck anyone else, no matter how traditionally attractive." Well, this is true with a population of 7 billion people (less so, obviously, if you are specifically talking about gay people). This would drastically change if the population dwindled to 500 after a ZA. But, your statement shows that you're still operating under the assumption that there is not a ZA, and thus, people still had a variety of options. They don't.

"Also, how would they even know who was gay or not? Would the gays just make a move on every available and armed man, running the distinct risk of getting beaten up or killed?" Probably not, but they could easily just say, "Hey, I'm gay."

Really, there is no way to demonstrate who is right, since a ZA has never occurred. However, there is ample evidence that under extreme circumstances, peoples behaviors, preferences, and choices, do change. Thus, I think I have more than enough evidence to suggest that people's sexual preferences would be set aside during a ZA. I obviously cannot assert that EVERY person would operate under my assumption; but, yeah, I think in a population of 500 (or however many are left: 5000, 10000), there is an extremely good chance that 3 gay guys (or straight) would likely have sex with each other, despite that person not being their type.

Fuck me , its a fictional TV show, zombies are not and will never be real.

What a colossal waste of time that post was...
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 15, 2017, 01:14:25 AM
Fuck me , its a fictional TV show, zombies are not and will never be real.

What a colossal waste of time that post was...

It's still real to me.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Parker on November 15, 2017, 01:49:56 AM
Fuck me , its a fictional TV show, zombies are not and will never be real.

What a colossal waste of time that post was...
Zombies are real


http://www.newsweek.com/parasite-zombie-ants-hijacks-bodies-not-brains-707816  (http://www.newsweek.com/parasite-zombie-ants-hijacks-bodies-not-brains-707816)
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 15, 2017, 07:05:48 AM
If greasy Daryl gets outer as homo, I am out.



Man that dude has only had one shower in those eight years the show stretches it seems...  Every time you see him it he has that drippy greasy hair in his face.  Cut that shit dude!! 

I like Daryl but it is getting hard to continue to watch him squint his eyes to peer out from behind of those greasy cracker version dread locks.

And that fucking Carl has long hair now, but half the time it seems like one of the fags has taken a blow dryer to it and teased out the ends to give it layers.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Beefjake on November 15, 2017, 09:18:24 AM
Yes, nor once has Darryl swiped the hair from his face 😀
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 15, 2017, 09:21:34 AM
Yes, nor once has Darryl swiped the hair from his face 😀

+1000

Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 15, 2017, 09:28:04 AM
Man that dude has only had one shower in those eight years the show stretches it seems...  Every time you see him it he has that drippy greasy hair in his face.  Cut that shit dude!!  

I like Daryl but it is getting hard to continue to watch him squint his eyes to peer out from behind of those greasy cracker version dread locks.

And that fucking Carl has long hair now, but half the time it seems like one of the fags has taken a blow dryer to it and teased out the ends to give it layers.


Yeah, Daryl is seriously grimy, yet that pole rider Jesus has Pantene hair, all nicely dried and combed.

Come to think of it, Rick is looking like a walking bacteria and germ factory, too. As well, he’s sporting a wicked case of trucker ass (no homo).

These folks need to hop in a friggin’ lake with a bar of soap.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 15, 2017, 09:48:13 AM
Yeah, Daryl is seriously grimy, yet that pole rider Jesus has Pantene hair, all nicely dried and combed.

Come to think of it, Rick is looking like a walking bacteria and germ factory, too. As well, he’s sporting a wicked case of trucker ass (no homo).

These folks need to hop in a friggin’ lake with a bar of soap.

Yeah.  Jesus looks like someone combined a Summer's Eve and Pantene commercial together. 

Carol got the best 'do on the show so far... nicely cut and expertly teased with gray highlights. 

Rick, Daryl, Morgan, Michonne, and Negan have been looking like walking petri dishes for a while. 
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Beefjake on November 15, 2017, 09:53:30 AM
That machine gun at least left empty shells.

Didn't even notice it before but those assaut rifles they have don't spit any shells out.
Hard not to notice when they have a close up shot of someone firing 100bullets without even reloading.

Would it really be that groundbreaking to shoot at someone underneath the car? When all those Fords seem to be armour plated...

That big machine gun. Dismantled and placed in a box was really put together fast...
But, even if it did blow holes to people, it just couldn't penetrate regular army jeep wind shield?

The driver had pistol put draw it only after Rick jumped the car.

The whole pursuit scene was totally out of any walking dead scenes before.

And, shit, that was at least the fifth time they had that same patch of road in this season.
Right hand shallowed curve. Only the surrounding CGI differ...

Oh sigh.

I know it is zombies. But after that defining fact other things should be realistic.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 15, 2017, 10:21:41 AM
On the shooting issues.....   

Ever notice Rick can fire the revolver, like...  82 times with never reloading. 
Daryl never runs out of arrows.
People run, fall down, get tossed off things where their rifles get banged around and trampled upon and the scopes are still zero'd in perfectly.
Shooting one zombie in the head will alert all other zombies in the vicinity...   but a group of humans having an all out firefight?  No zombies around.

A good slingshot and a bag of marbles would be more effect against the walkers than axes and knives.  Their heads are rotten so the marble would just tear right through.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: HTexan on November 15, 2017, 10:58:55 AM
On the shooting issues.....   

Ever notice Rick can fire the revolver, like...  82 times with never reloading. 
Daryl never runs out of arrows.
People run, fall down, get tossed off things where their rifles get banged around and trampled upon and the scopes are still zero'd in perfectly.
Shooting one zombie in the head will alert all other zombies in the vicinity...   but a group of humans having an all out firefight?  No zombies around.

A good slingshot and a bag of marbles would be more effect against the walkers than axes and knives.  Their heads are rotten so the marble would just tear right through.
Dude it is a fake Tv show.... you're over thinking it. If it was real, Rick would be dead before the show even started. People in comas don't do will without constant medical supervision, and don't start walking normally, if ever, right away.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 15, 2017, 12:28:15 PM
Walking dead Vikings would be cute TV  :D
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 15, 2017, 12:36:05 PM
Quote from: Be There link=
Fuck me , its a fictional TV show, zombies are not and will never be real.

What a colossal waste of time that post was...
[/quote

100% real,  >:(

Zombies exist  :P
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: SF1900 on November 15, 2017, 12:57:17 PM
On the shooting issues.....   

Ever notice Rick can fire the revolver, like...  82 times with never reloading. 
Daryl never runs out of arrows.
People run, fall down, get tossed off things where their rifles get banged around and trampled upon and the scopes are still zero'd in perfectly.
Shooting one zombie in the head will alert all other zombies in the vicinity...   but a group of humans having an all out firefight?  No zombies around.

A good slingshot and a bag of marbles would be more effect against the walkers than axes and knives.  Their heads are rotten so the marble would just tear right through.

Lurkernomore, how do you think a group of getbiggers would respond in the face of a Zombie Apocalypse?
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: LurkerNoMore on November 15, 2017, 02:36:06 PM
Lurkernomore, how do you think a group of getbiggers would respond in the face of a Zombie Apocalypse?

Like Danny Trejo at a Shizzo family reunion.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: Fortress on November 15, 2017, 03:22:09 PM
Rick must be hard-up to brave Michonne’s dank and likely fungi-infected Negroid clam.
Title: Re: The Walking ... Fag?
Post by: IRON CROSS on November 17, 2017, 12:47:58 AM
Rick must be hard-up to brave Michonne’s dank and likely fungi-infected Negroid clam.

Fuck,yesterday at 5pm  bumped into that skinny/ugly Jadis  (no idea what's her name)........... :P