Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The True Adonis on May 23, 2006, 07:42:20 PM

Title: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: The True Adonis on May 23, 2006, 07:42:20 PM
http://www.larryscott.com/bio/forum/read_thread.cfm?ForumID=2&ThreadID=926&Thread=345



Larry Scott 5/2/06 @ 12:46 PM Reply  |  Email This Topic  |  Print  |  Top
 

It was only Dianabol and max 10 mg which was such a low dose no one ever experienced Gyno.
Larry
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: The True Adonis on May 23, 2006, 08:01:47 PM
This is kind of interesting....

Larry Scott on his arm size:

larryscott 5/13/05 @ 10:39 AM Reply  |  Email This Topic  |  Print  |  Top
 

At my best my arms were 20.25 inches and it took me about 10 years to reach this goal. I used all kinds of strategies to do this for biceps, triceps and forearms. My Loaded Guns book has most of the secrets.
Your friend,
Larry Scott
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: alexxx on May 23, 2006, 08:06:34 PM
Sounds like Shawn Ray.. I'll tell you my secrets.. when you buy my DVD.



Good point! But we know better. ;D
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on May 23, 2006, 08:07:28 PM
Back then you could get gear with just a script from your Doctor. Even when I was a teen it was still easy to get a script!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Dan-O on May 23, 2006, 08:15:03 PM
Larry said somewhere (don't quote me on this) that his arms were maybe around the 18.5" mark before he discovered the magic of D-bol, and they blew up to over 20" with even just that low dosage.

I should also add, Scott was and is a genius when it comes to bodybuilding training and coaxing the most gains possible out of your body.  Don't think for a second that he sat around on his ass and expected drugs to build his body for him!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Bast175 on May 23, 2006, 08:15:19 PM
hmm how much could 10mg of dianabol help a bodybuilder?
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Bast175 on May 23, 2006, 08:19:48 PM
what is a normal dose of dbol now?  30mg?
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: sugarbear on May 23, 2006, 08:24:32 PM
arnold said larry scott did preacher curls and that's how he got started but said he never liked them but there necessary hahaha larry your secrets out now no ane has to buy our book! :D
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on May 23, 2006, 08:49:09 PM
One thing you have to realize is that because steroids were not banned, they were a lot stronger back then than they are today because they were made in the proper facilities instead of in someones basement.  Arnold & Mentzer quoted the same amounts of Dbol as well to what they used.


The difference is really from the additions of IGF-1, Insulin, Growth Hormone, etc and the newer cutting drugs as well.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on May 23, 2006, 08:52:18 PM
they were a lot stronger back then than they are today because they were made in the proper facilities instead of in someones basement. 
 

Huh???

Dude, sorry to inform you on this but they were far from being as strong then as they are now!!

Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: pumpster on May 23, 2006, 08:54:17 PM
Quote
One thing you have to realize is that because steroids were not banned, they were a lot stronger back then than they are today because they were made in the proper facilities instead of in someones basement.
Crap; if anything they're made more carefully now, and are obtained from modern factories. Nothing to do with illegal recreational drugs.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Triple-H_2005 on May 23, 2006, 09:06:17 PM
"Cutting drugs"

I never realized there were drugs that helped you magically lose bodyfat.  :-*
Neither did Vince.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: The True Adonis on May 23, 2006, 09:09:20 PM
Interesting stuff you guys know.  Check out his forum. He seems to answer every question.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: ManBearPig... on May 23, 2006, 09:17:41 PM
Interesting stuff you guys know.  Check out his forum. He seems to answer every question.

what do you think's better for adding mass?

30 mg dbol a day, or....lipstick?
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: youandme on May 23, 2006, 09:18:29 PM
His Hyper Growth protein powder is pretty good alot of sugar but good when your gaining weight,has a very different taste to it.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: onlyme on May 23, 2006, 09:34:53 PM
CIBA D-bol was $25 for 100 little blue pills back in the late 70's early 80's.  We could get $6 for a pre-loaded dart of Primobolan Depot that cost us $1.20 in Tijuana. 
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: HowieW on May 23, 2006, 09:40:05 PM
CIBA D-bol was $25 for 100 little blue pills back in the late 70's early 80's.  We could get $6 for a pre-loaded dart of Primobolan Depot that cost us $1.20 in Tijuana. 

Those were the days...legit stuff cheap with few legal hassles ;D
yes I used some back in the mid 80s as well, what can I say :D

Larry's book, "Loaded Guns" is a fantastic read about a legend
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: LuciusFox on May 23, 2006, 10:30:29 PM
Those were the days...legit stuff cheap with few legal hassles ;D
yes I used some back in the mid 80s as well, what can I say :D

Larry's book, "Loaded Guns" is a fantastic read about a legend

 Would you have used a touch of synthol ::) if it had been available? ;D
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: IFBBwannaB on May 23, 2006, 11:03:04 PM
Larry took 10mg just like Lee uses Deca for contest prep ... ::)
You really dont need mad dosages to grow but 10mg is streching it.

Larry had a choice...deny using..and look like a liar/saying he used quite alot and look like a junky/admiting he used very litle and be looked upon like a freak...gosh wonder why he said that... ::)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Wombat on May 23, 2006, 11:12:19 PM
Larry took 10mg just like Lee uses Deca for contest prep ... ::)
You really dont need mad dosages to grow but 10mg is streching it.

Larry had a choice...deny using..and look like a liar/saying he used quite alot and look like a junky/admiting he used very litle and be looked upon like a freak...gosh wonder why he said that... ::)

yeah Lee's statements are pretty funny considering Lee's fingers are getting thicker every year...And what does that tell ya???Massive amounts of growth hormone/anabolics
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Max_Rep on May 23, 2006, 11:39:03 PM
Back then you could get gear with just a script from your Doctor. Even when I was a teen it was still easy to get a script!

Still is if you're over 40.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: honest on May 23, 2006, 11:50:59 PM
Larrys autistic and he thought they were 1mg pills so he took 10 per day, please bodybuilders have been extremists always, your telling me he knew he was growing on two pills, and didnt think man i should take three, plus the man had a great physique but held more water than the hoover dam in comparison to todays stripped bodys , so two tabs to hold all that water, bitch please  :)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: LuciusFox on May 23, 2006, 11:52:53 PM
yeah Lee's statements are pretty funny considering Lee's fingers are getting thicker every year...And what does that tell ya???Massive amounts of growth hormone/anabolics

 Do you really notice that about Lee's fingers? ::)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on May 24, 2006, 12:07:01 AM
Larrys autistic and he thought they were 1mg pills so he took 10 per day, please bodybuilders have been extremists always, your telling me he knew he was growing on two pills, and didnt think man i should take three, plus the man had a great physique but held more water than the hoover dam in comparison to todays stripped bodys , so two tabs to hold all that water, bitch please  :)

I agree, 10mg of dbol  would not make you hold water, that would just give you a light pump.. nothing special

Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Sir William Idol on May 24, 2006, 12:10:36 AM
CIBA D-bol was $25 for 100 little blue pills back in the late 70's early 80's.  We could get $6 for a pre-loaded dart of Primobolan Depot that cost us $1.20 in Tijuana. 

you were a steroid dealer?
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: 240 is Back on May 24, 2006, 12:27:28 AM
"Cutting drugs"

I never realized there were drugs that helped you magically lose bodyfat.  :-*

LOL...they work... ask "T3rvilla"!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: onlyme on May 24, 2006, 12:37:15 AM
In the early 80's it was an easy way to make money.  I went to Tijuana 2 times a month sometimes but always in a different car.  The pharmacy I went to the guy was really cool.  After about a year or so and seeingthis guy all the time we became friends.  He finally told me that his brother was a pharmacist in Inglewood, CA.  Gave me his number and ended getting stuff from him.  The markup we had was unreal.  I mean primobolan depot was $1.20 and we sold it all the time for as high as $6.  Equipose was just coming into its own too.  When I was around it all day I was there.  It was being sold and used like nothing big.  I saw allot of stuff happening.  And I did by one bottle from uor resident gym pharmacist (which most people know on here).  It was $25.  He would open his trunk and would have two big boxes filled with anything you wanted. Not sure why I bought it.  It wasn't enough to do anything.  But the one thing I remember happening is when I was with a girl, my volume of "love juice" was really high.  I wasn't sure if the D-bol did it or not but that was the only thing I changed or added.  I told a friend and so he had me buy him a bottle.  We went to Palm Springs for the weekend and he literally took the entire bottle at one time.  I swear to god he did.  He thought it would make him cum more.  I can't rmemeber if it did or not.

By the way I wasn't a dealer but we did sell allot to some very well known guys for about a year or so. 
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: marcie999 on May 24, 2006, 12:40:06 AM

By the way I wasn't a dealer but we did sell allot to some very well known guys for about a year or so. 

Sounds like a dealer to me.

Hmmmmm
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gtbro1 on May 24, 2006, 01:00:26 AM
By the way I wasn't a dealer but we did sell allot to some very well known guys for about a year or so. 

  NOT DEALING like that now  will still land you in prison.  :)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: onlyme on May 24, 2006, 01:19:09 AM
  NOT DEALING like that now  will still land you in prison.  :)

Yea it sure would.  Back then it wasn't that bad.  We used to empty out our windsheiled washer container, overflow and even cut out the bottom of our spare tire and hide all the stuff.  Later on many of the pharmacist were following guys out to their cars and getting the license plate number.  They would call it in to the border and when you got there they would take you off to the side and find your shit either take you in for however long or let you go.  They would then take the stuff back to the pharamcist so he could resell it and then do it all over again.  It got kind of hairy at times.  But, we were noting compared to others.  We had less than 10 steady guys.  I know a guy who easily made thousands of dollars a week doing this.  And this was back more than 25 years ago. 
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: brianX on May 24, 2006, 02:06:07 AM
Larry said somewhere (don't quote me on this) that his arms were maybe around the 18.5" mark before he discovered the magic of D-bol, and they blew up to over 20" with even just that low dosage.

That's about what I would expect. Most of the idiots on this site think they could build 20" arms with enough drugs. In reality, your arms would have to be well over 18" naturally to even approach that kind of size with drugs.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Naked4Jesus on May 24, 2006, 03:07:14 AM
"Cutting drugs"

I never realized there were drugs that helped you magically lose bodyfat.  :-*

Clen, T3, DNP....
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: fearANDloathing on May 24, 2006, 04:26:22 AM
"Cutting drugs"

I never realized there were drugs that helped you magically lose bodyfat.  :-*
Vince is right on this one. Increased testosterone( from any anabolic steroid) increases muscle mass, raises your BMR and thus you do lose bodyfat. Nothing exotic is needed either, if your working out hard plain ole suspension will do it
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gh15 on May 24, 2006, 04:51:44 AM
10 facts about gear. (excluding gh/slin)

1.gear is NOT magic.
2.gear will work on ANY ONE
3.gear will work better on the bodybuilder who train smarter while on it.
4.being on gear does NOT mean you can go crazy on the weights
5.gear will only recover you better, help you get the calories you need for growth by keeping you hungry, and direct those calories to  the right "place"; gear will not build your muscle by itself! YOU build your muscles by training them and gear make the process 2times faster due to faster recovery and complete 100% recovery and growth between training sessions of the body part trained.
6.gear must be legit to work! i would not touch anything beside american or europian pharm products. mexico is dirty but is ok but it out of luck now days.
7.being on gear DOES NOT mean you can train 7 days a week 2 hours each session.
8. the most progress on gear will be made by the bodybuilder who sticks to the same routine he does when he was natural,, only try to increase weight poundage by as much as possible as long as FORM IS ON SPOT!
9.any bodybuilder can grow from any type of gear. you dont have to take test in addition to deca and you dont have to take something else with dianabol for growth. this is common mistake of most local gym rats that they never learn from.
10. your main mission is to chose the drug you want,, take it,, and concentrate more on the dose of the drug taken and on the form and training session insted of doing stupid combos of stuff and wait for miricales. the more advanced you will become the more stuff you will combine for a better effect. test is not a MUST! it is good for aggressiveness and sex drive but many MANY GUYS do not need it and it only gives them sides.

 
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: WOOO on May 24, 2006, 05:10:21 AM
what is a normal dose of dbol now?  30mg?
at least
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: sculpture on May 24, 2006, 05:29:21 AM
10 facts about gear. (excluding gh/slin)

1.gear is NOT magic.
2.gear will work on ANY ONE
3.gear will work better on the bodybuilder who train smarter while on it.
4.being on gear does NOT mean you can go crazy on the weights
5.gear will only recover you better, help you get the calories you need for growth by keeping you hungry, and direct those calories to  the right "place"; gear will not build your muscle by itself! YOU build your muscles by training them and gear make the process 2times faster due to faster recovery and complete 100% recovery and growth between training sessions of the body part trained.
6.gear must be legit to work! i would not touch anything beside american or europian pharm products. mexico is dirty but is ok but it out of luck now days.
7.being on gear DOES NOT mean you can train 7 days a week 2 hours each session.
8. the most progress on gear will be made by the bodybuilder who sticks to the same routine he does when he was natural,, only try to increase weight poundage by as much as possible as long as FORM IS ON SPOT!
9.any bodybuilder can grow from any type of gear. you dont have to take test in addition to deca and you dont have to take something else with dianabol for growth. this is common mistake of most local gym rats that they never learn from.
10. your main mission is to chose the drug you want,, take it,, and concentrate more on the dose of the drug taken and on the form and training session insted of doing stupid combos of stuff and wait for miricales. the more advanced you will become the more stuff you will combine for a better effect. test is not a MUST! it is good for aggressiveness and sex drive but many MANY GUYS do not need it and it only gives them sides.

 

What about products from thailand. Theres quie a few factories over there. Quality?
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gh15 on May 24, 2006, 05:39:10 AM
when i say europe i consider thailand in ;) goood stuff
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gracie bjj on May 24, 2006, 06:30:43 AM
hmm how much could 10mg of dianabol help a bodybuilder?

more than you could imagine ;)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: The Luke on May 24, 2006, 06:50:43 AM
10 facts about gear. (excluding gh/slin)

1.gear is NOT magic.
2.gear will work on ANY ONE
3.gear will work better on the bodybuilder who train smarter while on it.
4.being on gear does NOT mean you can go crazy on the weights
5.gear will only recover you better, help you get the calories you need for growth by keeping you hungry, and direct those calories to  the right "place"; gear will not build your muscle by itself! YOU build your muscles by training them and gear make the process 2times faster due to faster recovery and complete 100% recovery and growth between training sessions of the body part trained.
6.gear must be legit to work! i would not touch anything beside american or europian pharm products. mexico is dirty but is ok but it out of luck now days.
7.being on gear DOES NOT mean you can train 7 days a week 2 hours each session.
8. the most progress on gear will be made by the bodybuilder who sticks to the same routine he does when he was natural,, only try to increase weight poundage by as much as possible as long as FORM IS ON SPOT!
9.any bodybuilder can grow from any type of gear. you dont have to take test in addition to deca and you dont have to take something else with dianabol for growth. this is common mistake of most local gym rats that they never learn from.
10. your main mission is to chose the drug you want,, take it,, and concentrate more on the dose of the drug taken and on the form and training session insted of doing stupid combos of stuff and wait for miricales. the more advanced you will become the more stuff you will combine for a better effect. test is not a MUST! it is good for aggressiveness and sex drive but many MANY GUYS do not need it and it only gives them sides.

 

This should be a sticky on the Steroid Info Board!!
Big BUMP!!

The Luke
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on May 24, 2006, 06:54:16 AM
Still is if you're over 40.

Thank goodness I'm over 40 huh ;D!!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: pumpster on May 24, 2006, 06:56:47 AM
Quote
1.gear is NOT magic.
2.gear will work on ANY ONE
3.gear will work better on the bodybuilder who train smarter while on it.
4.being on gear does NOT mean you can go crazy on the weights
5.gear will only recover you better, help you get the calories you need for growth by keeping you hungry, and direct those calories to  the right "place"; gear will not build your muscle by itself! YOU build your muscles by training them and gear make the process 2times faster due to faster recovery and complete 100% recovery and growth between training sessions of the body part trained.
6.gear must be legit to work! i would not touch anything beside american or europian pharm products. mexico is dirty but is ok but it out of luck now days.
7.being on gear DOES NOT mean you can train 7 days a week 2 hours each session.
8. the most progress on gear will be made by the bodybuilder who sticks to the same routine he does when he was natural,, only try to increase weight poundage by as much as possible as long as FORM IS ON SPOT!
9.any bodybuilder can grow from any type of gear. you dont have to take test in addition to deca and you dont have to take something else with dianabol for growth. this is common mistake of most local gym rats that they never learn from.
10. your main mission is to chose the drug you want,, take it,, and concentrate more on the dose of the drug taken and on the form and training session insted of doing stupid combos of stuff and wait for miricales. the more advanced you will become the more stuff you will combine for a better effect. test is not a MUST! it is good for aggressiveness and sex drive but many MANY GUYS do not need it and it only gives them sides.

Someone who seemed equally knowledgable posted something a while ago specifically saying that an oral without an accompanying injectable's far less effective. BBs who followed Scott in the early-mid 70s seemed to agree.

Individual reactions vary-for some like Scott there's a difference, for others like Schwarzenegger there's a huge difference.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: The Luke on May 24, 2006, 07:09:49 AM
Funny story,

I knew a girl in college who was doing a post doctoral research project on androgenic and anabolic hormones... testosterone analogs and isoforms etc etc which required her to chemically fraction novel testosterone-like molecules from large quantities of androgen base.... anyway, she was telling me all about these pharmaceutical company profit margins.

Then she let slip something that literallly freaked me out....

Excluding lab costs (her lab was provided by the college), her time (working on a research project earning $400 a week) and equipment overheads.... she could make a batch of testosterone (and most other anabolic steroids) from $30 of base chamicals in a little less than a week.

The batch size?.... one kilo.... that's 2.2lbs weight of testosterone... or 1,000,000 milligrams, that's twenty years worth of gear... for thirty bucks.

A (naive) friend of mine had just paid $300 (200 Irish punts) for an eight week cycle of test. I never could bring myself to tell him.


The Luke 
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gracie bjj on May 24, 2006, 07:28:23 AM
years back i used to take one dbol(ciba geigy)the really good ones,they dont make those anymore,anyway 1 year i just took one 5mg pill every morning an hour before i trained,it could have been placebo but ill tell ya i got the best pumps and made some decent gains,nothing dramatic,the gains were very minimal but nonetheless it was progeress and the best part was i knew i wouldnt have any side effects from such a small dose.one thing i know that was not placebo though was my aggression in the weight room,i really didnt get any stronger but my intensity was alittle higher then usuall on the one dbol.i felt the one pill for about 3 hours and that was it
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on May 24, 2006, 08:12:37 AM
I snort a gram of coke a week and it's not doing shit for me
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gracie bjj on May 24, 2006, 09:15:49 AM
I snort a gram of coke a week and it's not doing shit for me

lol,i been good for the last month with that crap,i still get urges but im fighting them real hard
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: pumpster on May 24, 2006, 09:20:05 AM
Quote
I snort a gram of coke a week and it's not doing shit for me
Wise investment. Try glue it's cheaper.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on May 24, 2006, 09:36:43 AM
I snort a gram of coke a week and it's not doing shit for me

It's time to up the dosage ;)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on May 24, 2006, 09:48:09 AM
I'm huffing some Carbona tonight...I'll KEEP YOU BRO'S POSTED!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Bast175 on May 24, 2006, 10:10:45 AM
If I take 10mg of dbol starting today will I look like Larry Scott by this Saturday?

thanks
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Dan-O on May 24, 2006, 10:19:06 AM
If I take 10mg of dbol starting today will I look like Larry Scott by this Saturday?

thanks

It might take you until the next Saturday.  You'll just have to be patient.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gracie bjj on May 24, 2006, 01:52:54 PM
all this dbol talk now im getting excited,i got afew hundred of those little pink ones with the snake on one side from thailand,maybe ill chew on one in the morning before i cream my delts and forearms ;)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: sarcasm on May 24, 2006, 01:53:48 PM
all this dbol talk now im getting excited,i got afew hundred of those little pink ones with the snake on one side from thailand,maybe ill chew on one in the morning before i cream my delts and forearms ;)
you must be a monster.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: gracie bjj on May 24, 2006, 01:56:40 PM
you must be a monster.

far from it,just a smooth 41 yr old driving a sports car trying to relive his younger years
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: pumpster on May 24, 2006, 02:05:00 PM
Quote
you must be a monster.

far from it,just a smooth 41 yr old driving a sports car trying to relive his younger years
EXCELLENT; the distinguished "older" BB look.  ;)
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Bast175 on May 24, 2006, 02:48:44 PM
wouldn't taking too low a dosage of juice actually lower your testosterone?  or would your natural testosterone not be shut down like with a regular dose and just be heighted by the low dosage?
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Captain Equipoise on May 24, 2006, 03:35:47 PM
wouldn't taking too low a dosage of juice actually lower your testosterone?  or would your natural testosterone not be shut down like with a regular dose and just be heighted by the low dosage?

dbol shuts off your natural test VERY QUICKLY.  A low dosage of juice (aside from a few) also shuts down your natural test production.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: LuciusFox on May 24, 2006, 06:29:44 PM
Funny story,

I knew a girl in college who was doing a post doctoral research project on androgenic and anabolic hormones... testosterone analogs and isoforms etc etc which required her to chemically fraction novel testosterone-like molecules from large quantities of androgen base.... anyway, she was telling me all about these pharmaceutical company profit margins.

Then she let slip something that literallly freaked me out....

Excluding lab costs (her lab was provided by the college), her time (working on a research project earning $400 a week) and equipment overheads.... she could make a batch of testosterone (and most other anabolic steroids) from $30 of base chamicals in a little less than a week.

The batch size?.... one kilo.... that's 2.2lbs weight of testosterone... or 1,000,000 milligrams, that's twenty years worth of gear... for thirty bucks.

A (naive) friend of mine had just paid $300 (200 Irish punts) for an eight week cycle of test. I never could bring myself to tell him.


The Luke 

  Very interesting post!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on May 24, 2006, 10:01:00 PM
all this dbol talk now im getting excited,i got afew hundred of those little pink ones with the snake on one side from thailand,maybe ill chew on one in the morning before i cream my delts and forearms ;)

I haven't taken D-bol in years. I remember I used to use the little blue 5mg pills.........AAhhhhh, the memories!!
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: suckmymuscle on May 24, 2006, 10:12:09 PM
Larrys autistic and he thought they were 1mg pills so he took 10 per day, please bodybuilders have been extremists always, your telling me he knew he was growing on two pills, and didnt think man i should take three, plus the man had a great physique but held more water than the hoover dam in comparison to todays stripped bodys , so two tabs to hold all that water, bitch please  :)

  Larry Scott has autism ???

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: IFBBwannaB on May 24, 2006, 10:34:29 PM
  Very interesting post!


Thats news ? You can order powders and make juice at home at about the same costs.

Not to mention that many times students of chemiestry were caught making drugs in universities labs.Most dont even think about roids since they are less profitable.Usualy they make X and such.

Universities got good equipment and full acsess to research substances that most companies will have problem to get.So I fail to see why you are so shocked.
Title: Re: Larry Scott on STEROID USE in the 60s.
Post by: DarthNemesis21 on May 25, 2006, 03:08:30 PM
far from it,just a smooth 41 yr old driving a sports car trying to relive his younger years
LOL Damn bro.I respect your honesty