yeah and when they can't do it and this nutbag has a successful terrorist attack on US soil or against US soldiers or assets abroad you'd be the first one to bitch about it

you just love defending terrorists

notice that he still needed Pickering to agree which he could have chosen not to do

the subpoena would have required him to testify before a congressional committee ....not in private and even then Pickering could have invoked his 5th amendment if he wanted to

Pickering agreed to the private meeting to avoid the subpoena but he could have chosen that option and avoided a private meeting

totally agree

Al-Awlaki could have voluntarily made himself available to talk with US authorities and could have avoided being killed and his son would still be alive today today.   Bad choices on his part.  He was a member of al-Qaeda and called for jihad agains the US
He was involved with the Fort Hood shooter and the underwear bomber and was The Yemeni government began trying him in absentia in November 2010, for plotting to kill foreigners and being a member of al-Qaeda. A Yemeni judge ordered that he be captured "dead or alive.    What are we supposed to do.  Sit around and wait for this guy to have a successful terrorist attack (and he actually did given the Fort Hood shooting).   This guy got exactly what was coming to him and how 333 or anyone can defend this guy is beyond me.

Tough shit for Issa (and OF COURSE Issa can't force them to do it privately moron)

Tough shit for you too

I don't know what you do nor do I give a shit

Why would you give a rats ass what I do

Does anyone here want to offer an opinion on what laws were broken (if any)

I think it's even simpler than that

333 hates this country so when someone is a terrorist and seek to do violence to this country or it's citizens then 333 supports that person

It's pretty obvious from 333's posts that he hates the United State and hates his fellow citizens (he has wished many times for mass death of his fellow citizens) but for some reason as soon as a citizen turns into a terrorist 333 suddenly cares about that person

I don't see it

post is again

make sure it's the one where they say Obama is acting like a tyrant

just post the link where they say he is acting like a tyrant

I have an issue with the fact that you love terrorists and are constantly apologizing and defending them

too bad that an innocent kid was killed but then I never heard a peep out of you when the US was responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths of innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan so I'm having a hard time believing you suddenly give a shit

can you post a link where they say he is acting like a tyrant

watch out

you're probably next

I have no idea if the comparison is valid or not

can you post a link to the study

As I've already said a couple of times in this thread and many many times before, I think that certain people in many different religions sometimes let their religious beliefs drive them to the point of committing violence.   It seems that those people often believe they are more devout or that their deeper beliefs drive and justify their actions.    These people might have already been nuts or been on the cusp or perhaps something in their learned beliefs have triggered it. 

LOL @ Tyrant

you must be scared of your own shadow if you think Obama is a tyrant

right, because both of those guys would allow an opposing party in their country, much less an opposing party that can hold hearings, etc..

that makes perfect sense

you don't know who did the study but you're offering it up as some sort of conclusive proof that Christians become less violent as they become more devout.  That claim seem to contradict reality of the christian fundies who commit acts of violence.

when is Obama going to start acting like a Dictator and not a democratically elected POTUS

what kind of dictator would tolerate this kind of thing

Hey Loco - a couple of quick questions

who did this so called study and do you think christians who commit acts of violence (such as bombing abortion clinics, killing doctors, etc..) would be surprised to find out they are less devout than their non-violent brethren ?

Republican Darrell Issa must be in on the scam since he let Lerner get away without forcing her to testify

BTW - what's up with Dictator Obama even letting Issa hold these phony hearings

We elected Obama to be our dictator so when is he going to start acting like one.   How about throwing some of these Republican Senators in jail (or even worse).  That's what a real dictator would do

yeah, that make a lot of sense

I don't disagree with that point of view

Most people who choose to follow a certain religion find a way to navigate around the bullshit and obviously there are many who don't do that

great job not being able to even have one cogent response to anything I wrote

then again, you are a profoundly stupid person who in all likelihood has some true mental and emotional challenges

yes, I don't think religion is inherently dangerous

some people let their religious beliefs drive them insane (or they were already insane before)

For example, some christians believe it's perfectly acceptable to blow up abortion clinic, murder doctors. etc.. and in fact they HAVE to do it due to their religious beliefs.   I think they are nuts and possibly were even nuts before they became Christians or just coincidental to being christian

I definitely think religious fundamentalism leads to some people going nuts

pick any religion and you can find examples of this

when your religious belief leads you believe you need to commit acts of violence then your religion has driven you nuts (and for some people I suspect it's a very short drive)

you're asking if I agree with myself?