 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: 1 [2]
|
|
27
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Shawn Ray + MD vs Palumbo + Rx
|
on: November 22, 2009, 07:04:20 PM
|
|
Dave has a much more likable personality than Shawn. Dave cares about other people and it show. Shawn's personality seems to polarize people. Either you hate him or you dislike him.
Blechman also needs some public relations help. To the fans he comes across as a rich cheapskate who hires and fires people at will. Trey Brewer does an in the trenches on RX, so Blechman hires him to put an end to that. IMO this was a childish move and not very bright considering Trey's placing at the Nats.
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
Getbig Alternative Boards / V Board - General Random Threads / Re: RX muscle > MD
|
on: November 02, 2009, 07:50:43 PM
|
I have to give props to Huge 285 these days, I think Rx muscle is probably better than MD right now in terms of BB websites.
They have tons of free videos which are uploaded almost every second day.
Even though they have less profile people than MD they actually have meaningful conversations with Palumbo. They go to every show and give pretty insightful commentary on the shows rather than just plugging MD "athletes". It's hillarious that
Ray and Flex can't even come close to DP.
I can't believe how important he actually was for MD's website. The videos are on MD are so boring they are unwatchable. Basically just Branch warren doing chest or legs for the hundredth time with Brian Dobson thanking god over and over again.
Flex and BB.com are not even on the radar.
Getbig is still the best forum though by a long shot.
As far as I'm concerned, Dave Palumbo was the old MD. |
|
|
|
|
34
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Mentzer owning Schwarzenigger?
|
on: October 29, 2009, 07:02:11 PM
|
Mentzer was right about a lot. His philosophy of HIT helped me when I was making no gains. Classic case of over training and under eating. At one point I was training legs and back three times a week. now I train them only once a week and am able to constantly progress. I do two working sets per exercise, similar to Yates. What he said about less training, but more intensity was right on the money; especially for a natural like myself. |
|
|
|
|
38
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Zane VS Putnam
|
on: October 24, 2009, 06:18:00 AM
|
Zane is a twink compared to the muscle men of today, he could never turn pro and would be laughed at the amatuer level haha fuckin twink
If Putnam can turn pro than Zane surely could turn pro. If Zane wanted to put on more muscle he could. In fact he had much bigger legs earlier in his career, but decided they were overpowering his upper body. I once read a leg workout he had with Arnold where he out-squated Arnold with 400 lbs. So, the guy was strong and could have easily converted that strength to mass. He was striving for a look. Forget how much you weigh. What do you look like in the mirror.  I wish my gym had people that look like this. Talk about motivation.  Twink? I think not. Check out his wife below.  |
|
|
|
|
39
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Zane VS Putnam
|
on: October 23, 2009, 06:41:36 PM
|
Zane is a twink compared to the muscle men of today, he could never turn pro and would be laughed at the amatuer level haha fuckin twink
Some people just can't recognize quality. Is this more to your liking?  |
|
|
|
|
40
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Zane VS Putnam
|
on: October 23, 2009, 06:30:22 PM
|
Noob. At least you are appealing to the jerkoff's of the iron era. Why chose Putnam to compare to Zane anyway, that makes no sense.
I saw an earlier post which compared the two and people actually thought Putnam was better. They claimed that today Putnam would be judged better than Zane. To me that just indicates how misguided the judging is today. For example Branch beating Dexter. Do I need to say more.  |
|
|
|
|
41
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Zane VS Putnam
|
on: October 23, 2009, 06:13:39 PM
|
  Anyone who thinks Peter Putnam is a better bodybuilder than Frank Zane needs to get their eyes checked. These two aren't even in the same league. To quote Lee Labrada "The bodies have gotten bigger, they have not gotten better." No I am not Frank Zane. |
|
|
|
|
42
|
Getbig Main Boards / Gossip & Opinions / Re: Stallone on the Today Show
|
on: October 22, 2009, 07:21:26 PM
|
GH is NOT a Steroid... Stallone is right...
True, GH is not a steroid, but it is used for building muscle and burning fat. The point of this post was to let the viewer decide if they believe he is telling the truth. In my opinion, he is implying that GH is not used for bodybuilding and most of us know that's not true. |
|
|
|
|
